13.06.2015 Views

Quantum Gravity : Mathematical Models and Experimental Bounds

Quantum Gravity : Mathematical Models and Experimental Bounds

Quantum Gravity : Mathematical Models and Experimental Bounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 Claus Lämmerzahl<br />

The two postulates have some immediate consequences which all can be tested<br />

in experiments:<br />

• The velocity of light, c, does not depend on<br />

– the velocity of the source (what is a statement of the uniqueness of the<br />

phenomenon)<br />

– the velocity of the observer,<br />

– the direction of propagation,<br />

– the polarization or frequency of the light ray.<br />

• The relativity principle implies that<br />

– the limiting velocity of all particles is the speed of light<br />

c = c + = c − = c ν = v max<br />

p<br />

= v max<br />

e<br />

= v grav<br />

(If these velocities are not equal then this defines a preferred frame by<br />

the condition that in this frame both limiting velocities are isotropic.<br />

This is the SR aspect of the THɛµ–formalism (see, e.g., [21, 22] <strong>and</strong><br />

references therein. This is in contradiction to the second postulate, with<br />

the consequence that c is universal <strong>and</strong>, thus, can be interpreted as<br />

geometry.)<br />

– that all physics is the same in all inertial systems, that is, experimental<br />

results do not depend on the<br />

∗ orientation of the laboratory <strong>and</strong><br />

∗ on the velocity of the laboratory.<br />

Accordingly, we have the following classes of experiments:<br />

3.3.1. Constancy of c. The independence of the speed of light from the velocity of<br />

the source has been examined by astrophysical observations as well as in laboratory<br />

experiments. We mention just two of them: (i) the observation by Brecher [23] who<br />

analyzed the time of arrival of X–rays emitted from distant a bright star orbiting a<br />

dark, heavy central star. We model a hypothetical dependence of the speed of light<br />

c from the velocity of the source by c ′ = c+κv, wherev is the velocity of the source<br />

<strong>and</strong> κ some parameter which is 0 in SR <strong>and</strong> 1 in Galilean kinematics. If the star<br />

is moving away from the Earth, the emitted light is slower than the light emitted<br />

when the star is moving toward the Earth. Therefore, light emitted toward the<br />

Earth may overtake the light emitted earlier. The images of the star seen on Earth<br />

may show an achronological order. Since this has never been observed one can<br />

derive κ ≤ 10 −10 . A laboratory version of this has been carried through at CERN<br />

[24]. Protons hitting a Beryllium target created π 0 mesons possessing a velocity of<br />

v =0.99975c. Theseπ 0 mesons decay within 10 −16 s into photons which velocity<br />

has been measured <strong>and</strong> compared with the velocity of photons emitted from π 0<br />

mesons at rest. No difference in the speed of the photons has been found leading<br />

to κ ≤ 10 −6 . Though this is not as good as the Brecher result, it shows the result<br />

for a velocity of the source being almost the speed of light. The independence of<br />

the speed of light from the velocity of the source cannot be demonstrated more<br />

convincingly than by this experiment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!