13.06.2015 Views

1 Minutes of the County Commissioners of Worcester County ...

1 Minutes of the County Commissioners of Worcester County ...

1 Minutes of the County Commissioners of Worcester County ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oth nuisances.<br />

Pursuant to <strong>the</strong> recommendation <strong>of</strong> Mr. Tudor and upon a motion by Commissioner<br />

Purnell, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commissioners</strong> unanimously approved bid specifications for <strong>the</strong> demolition <strong>of</strong> a<br />

commercial structure located at 5313 Snow Hill Road, Snow Hill, Maryland and identified on<br />

Tax Map 63 as Parcel 9 (<strong>the</strong> old Pusey‟s Store) and which is <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> Nuisance Abatement<br />

Order No. 12-1. Mr. Tudor explained that this structure is unable to be burned due to <strong>the</strong><br />

proximity <strong>of</strong> an adjacent building less than two feet from <strong>the</strong> rear <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure. In response to<br />

a question by Commissioner Lockfaw, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commissioners</strong> agreed to consult with DPW Director<br />

John Tustin as to whe<strong>the</strong>r DPW staff could complete <strong>the</strong> abatement prior to distributing <strong>the</strong><br />

approved bid documents.<br />

The <strong>Commissioners</strong> conducted a public hearing to receive comments on six applications<br />

to sell easements to <strong>the</strong> Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) in<br />

FY13/14 as follows: a 133-acre property owned by Benjamin and Elizabeth Aydelotte and<br />

located at 3098 Brantley Road and more specifically identified on Tax Map 92 as Parcel 63; a<br />

129.99-acre property owned by Doris Virginia East and located at 1429 Holly Swamp Road and<br />

more specifically identified on Tax Map 93 as Parcel 2; a 234.6-acre property owned by Glad<br />

Mar Land Company and located on <strong>the</strong> east side <strong>of</strong> Fleming Mill Road and more specifically<br />

identified on Tax Map 69 as Parcel 40; a 160.8-acre property owned by Franklin Holland and<br />

located on <strong>the</strong> east side <strong>of</strong> MD Rt. 12 north <strong>of</strong> Girdletree and more specifically identified on Tax<br />

Map 79 as Parcel 280; a 65-acre property owned by John R. Justice and located on Cedar Hall<br />

Road and more specifically identified on Tax Map 91 as Parcel 73; and a 118.27-acre property<br />

owned by Willis Redden and located on <strong>the</strong> north and south sides <strong>of</strong> Stockton Road and more<br />

specifically identified on Tax Map 85 as Parcel 54. Mr. Tudor stated that <strong>the</strong> six easement<br />

applications have been reviewed by both <strong>the</strong> <strong>Worcester</strong> <strong>County</strong> Agricultural Land Preservation<br />

Advisory Board and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Worcester</strong> <strong>County</strong> Planning Commission; and, except for <strong>the</strong> Doris V.<br />

East property which is not currently in agricultural production and nearly completely enrolled in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP), all have been given favorable<br />

recommendations. In response to a question by Commissioner Bunting, Mr. Tudor advised <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Commissioners</strong> that <strong>the</strong> list before <strong>the</strong>m is not ranked in order <strong>of</strong> priority, but ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

alphabetically. He explained that <strong>the</strong> ranking was determined by specific criteria and could not be<br />

amended by <strong>the</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Commissioners</strong>. However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commissioners</strong> could choose <strong>the</strong> overall<br />

number <strong>of</strong> properties to be forwarded to <strong>the</strong> State for consideration. For example, <strong>the</strong>y could<br />

choose to send <strong>the</strong> top three or four properties only, if <strong>the</strong>y preferred. He fur<strong>the</strong>r stated that each<br />

property submitted will incur an appraisal fee <strong>of</strong> roughly $4,000, while in reality MALPF funding<br />

is likely available to purchase only two easements. Submitting fewer than six applications would<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore be prudent. Commissioner Shockley stated that <strong>the</strong> rankings are based on several<br />

factors, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commissioners</strong> cannot arbitrarily select applications to be submitted.<br />

Commissioner Church opened <strong>the</strong> floor to receive public comment.<br />

Virginia East opposed <strong>the</strong> <strong>County</strong> Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Board‟s<br />

recommendation to exclude her property from <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> applications to <strong>the</strong> MALPF for<br />

consideration. She stated that <strong>the</strong> primary reason given for excluding her property from<br />

2 Open Session - August 21, 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!