17.06.2015 Views

need to know / leases - project update - BDO International

need to know / leases - project update - BDO International

need to know / leases - project update - BDO International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 LEASES - A PROJECT UPDATE<br />

SCOPE<br />

The proposed scope means that the new requirements would apply <strong>to</strong> all <strong>leases</strong> (including sub<strong>leases</strong>) except for:<br />

––<br />

Leases for the right <strong>to</strong> explore for or use minerals, oil, natural gas and similar non-regenerative resources<br />

––<br />

Leases of biological assets<br />

––<br />

Leases of service concession arrangements within the scope of IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements<br />

––<br />

Short term <strong>leases</strong> (these are <strong>leases</strong> with a maximum possible term, including any options <strong>to</strong> renew, of 12 months or less).<br />

This means that <strong>leases</strong> of noncore assets (that is, assets not related <strong>to</strong> an entity’s main business activities), and long term <strong>leases</strong><br />

of land, would be within the scope of the proposals. In addition, there is no scope exclusion for assets that are often treated as<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ry, such as non-depreciating spare parts, operating materials, and supplies, if these are associated with the leasing of<br />

another underlying asset. This may represent a significant further change for some entities.<br />

Although not specifically within the scope of the proposals, intangible assets are noted as not being required <strong>to</strong> be accounted<br />

for in accordance with the <strong>leases</strong> standard. This means that it would appear that an entity will have an option <strong>to</strong> apply the new<br />

requirements <strong>to</strong> <strong>leases</strong> of intangibles. It is not yet clear whether the approach adopted would <strong>need</strong> <strong>to</strong> be applied <strong>to</strong> all leased<br />

intangibles, or whether an entity would have a choice on an individual leased asset basis.<br />

CONTRACTS THAT CONTAIN LEASE AND<br />

NON-LEASE COMPONENTS<br />

For contracts that contain lease and non-lease components, the proposals would require each component <strong>to</strong> be identified<br />

and accounted for separately.<br />

A lessee would allocate payments due under the overall contract as follows:<br />

––<br />

If the purchase price of each component is observable, the lessee would allocate the payments on the basis of the relative<br />

purchase prices of individual components.<br />

––<br />

If the purchase price of one or more, but not all, of the components is observable, the lessee would allocate the payments<br />

on the basis of a residual method.<br />

––<br />

If there are no observable purchase prices, the lessee would account for all the payments required by the contract as a<br />

lease.<br />

Application guidance is <strong>to</strong> be included in the proposals, <strong>to</strong> assist lessees in determining what is meant by an ‘observable<br />

price’. This will take account of guidance that is planned <strong>to</strong> be included in other <strong>project</strong>s, in particular for revenue recognition.<br />

A lessor would allocate payments <strong>to</strong> be received in accordance with the guidance on revenue recognition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!