Intercomparison of European Fog Forecast Models - Cosmo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lindenberg Area Observatory <strong>of</strong> DWD supplies: • Visibility 2m • Cloud cover • Radiative fluxes (SW, LW, Latent and Sensible) • 10m-Mast: T, RH, Wind • 100m-Mast: T, RH, Wind • Radiosounding (00, 06, 12 and 18 UTC) • Soil temperature • Soil moisture
Participants Statistical Model: MOS-ARPEGE France: H. Petithomme MOS statistics using linear discriminant analysis Uses model output <strong>of</strong> the hydrostatic global model ARPEGE Predictand: Predictor: visibility with different thresholds pressure at the ground, cloud cover, 10m wind speed, RH2m, T2m
Page 1 and 2: COSMO User’s Seminar Langen, Marc
Page 3 and 4: Fog: A visibility reduction 1.4km 1
Page 5: Comparison Campaign on the Lindenbe
Page 9 and 10: Turbulence: Visibility: Non-operati
Page 11 and 12: Ensemble Forecast To analyse the ba
Page 13 and 14: False Alarm Rate What fraction of t
Page 15 and 16: Equitable Threat Score How well did
Page 17 and 18: Visibility 2m: case I Legend: Vis 1
Page 19 and 20: Case I: Vertical profile at Lindenb
Page 21 and 22: Case I: Close to the ground
Page 23 and 24: Visibility 2m: case II Legend: Vis
Page 25 and 26: Case II: Vertical profile at Linden
Page 27 and 28: Case II: Close to the ground
Page 29: Outlooks • Adapted turbulent sche
Page 32 and 33: What is FOG ? WMO definition “Sus
Page 34 and 35: Visibility 2m: case III Legend: Vis
Page 36 and 37: Case III: Vertical profile at Linde
Page 38: Case III: Close to the ground

Intercomparison of European Fog Forecast Models - Cosmo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?