Financial Returns To Industry From The Federal Aid - Wildlife and ...
Financial Returns To Industry From The Federal Aid - Wildlife and ...
Financial Returns To Industry From The Federal Aid - Wildlife and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
If the <strong>Wildlife</strong> Restoration program were rescinded or reallocated, the direct annual loss<br />
of $484,765,728 in state conservation grants would have to be made up in license fees<br />
to maintain current programs. This would require an across the board increase in<br />
hunting license fees of more than 36%! Assuming that state agencies could hold off<br />
state-legislated diversions of these license dollars, which might be unlikely, this increase<br />
in license fees <strong>and</strong> in the overall cost of hunting would cause a decline in hunters. This<br />
decrease in participation would, in turn, further decrease overall sales by hunting<br />
manufacturers <strong>and</strong> other businesses. Plus, the degradation of wildlife conservation<br />
funding would seriously undermine long-term conservation efforts <strong>and</strong> likely destroy<br />
what is widely regarded as the most successful wildlife conservation program in the<br />
world!<br />
More <strong>Wildlife</strong> Translates Into More Hunting<br />
In simple terms, abundant wildlife populations equate to more hunting opportunities;<br />
more hunting opportunities equate to increased purchases of hunting <strong>and</strong> shooting<br />
equipment. For example, in 1937, 11 states had no open seasons for deer <strong>and</strong> three<br />
others had only local seasons. Virtually all of the remaining states had far more<br />
restrictive seasons than enjoyed today.<br />
When comparing “<strong>The</strong>n <strong>and</strong> Now,” an obvious question is: "How large would the hunting<br />
<strong>and</strong> shooting-sports industries be today if wildlife populations were not restored?"<br />
An exact answer to this question is not possible, but clearly, the hunting <strong>and</strong> shootingsports<br />
industries of today exist largely because wildlife populations have been restored<br />
to numbers inconceivable in the early 1900s. <strong>The</strong>se restored wildlife populations<br />
provide millions of Americans opportunities to hunt a wide array of species with a<br />
diversity of equipment that was not even dreamed about when the <strong>Wildlife</strong> Restoration<br />
Act was passed.<br />
Potential Hunting-Opportunity Days<br />
<strong>The</strong> purpose of the maps to follow <strong>and</strong> the corresponding maps <strong>and</strong> detailed table in<br />
Appendices E <strong>and</strong> F respectively is to illustrate the success of modern wildlife<br />
management that is the result of the partnership between the hunting <strong>and</strong> shootingsports<br />
industries, state <strong>and</strong> federal wildlife <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> management agencies, <strong>and</strong><br />
conservation minded non-government organizations.<br />
<strong>The</strong> precise number of hunting-opportunity days varies annually as a result of the<br />
season- setting processes used by each state, as well as calendar-day adjustments.<br />
Some seasons may be slightly inflated because Sundays may be included in the<br />
calculations. However, hunting on Sunday is not legal in all states or on all l<strong>and</strong>s within<br />
a state. Readers should consult specific hunting regulations for details on hunting<br />
opportunities available for specific species. <strong>The</strong> numbers cited are used to illustrate the<br />
relative success of our collective conservation efforts.<br />
Potential hunting-opportunity days were developed as a result of a careful review of<br />
state- agency websites <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Federal</strong> Register (for waterfowl seasons). Opportunity<br />
21