Agenda reports pack PDF 347 KB - Meetings, agendas, and minutes
Agenda reports pack PDF 347 KB - Meetings, agendas, and minutes
Agenda reports pack PDF 347 KB - Meetings, agendas, and minutes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Proposals for 2013/14 included inspecting all Social Care Organisations <strong>and</strong><br />
most Independent Health Care Organisations; dentists who had not already been<br />
inspected; pilot inspections of GP practices had started <strong>and</strong> these would be rolled out<br />
once methodology had been confirmed; making major changes to the way the NHS<br />
was inspected including actions arising from the Francis report; taking action where<br />
services were not good enough; <strong>and</strong> working with partner agencies. Reference was<br />
made to the significant organisational change for the CQC over the next 18 months.<br />
The CQC’s intentions to work with the Board were highlighted, the key being to<br />
have effective communication links <strong>and</strong> periodic updates. They would keep the Board<br />
up to date with their activity <strong>and</strong> wanted the Board to share any key themes or<br />
concerns with them. The goal was to share <strong>and</strong> use information/intelligence for the<br />
benefit of people who used the services.<br />
The Board questioned Ms Ward on a number of issues <strong>and</strong> responses were<br />
provided. Matters raised included:<br />
• The prioritisation of services to be inspected<br />
• The potential for raising concerns elsewhere e.g. the General Medical<br />
Council<br />
• The availability of information for Board members from the Warwickshire<br />
Inspection Team<br />
• The implications of the £20b savings to be made by NHS hospitals<br />
• The payment of fees <strong>and</strong> the scale for these charges<br />
• The considerations given to the views of patients/residents <strong>and</strong> staff<br />
• Links between Healthwatch <strong>and</strong> the CQC<br />
• Protection for whistle blowers<br />
• How the CQC raise issues where an organisation is compliant but the<br />
inspector still has concerns<br />
• How evidence is gathered<br />
• Further information about inspections involving patients/residents with mental<br />
health <strong>and</strong> physical needs<br />
• Joint inspections for cross boundary organisations<br />
• Further details about inspections at hospitals<br />
• The availability of information for members of the public.<br />
Councillor Townshend referred to CQC inspections at University Hospital<br />
Coventry <strong>and</strong> Warwickshire.<br />
RESOLVED that:<br />
(i) The intention to develop stronger links between the Scrutiny Board <strong>and</strong><br />
the CQC be noted.<br />
(ii) An update report be submitted to a future meeting of the Board in<br />
approximately six months to include the following:<br />
a) Any areas of concern for the CQC in Coventry<br />
b) Further details about the outcomes of the pilot inspections of GPs<br />
Page 6