26.06.2015 Views

Agenda reports pack PDF 347 KB - Meetings, agendas, and minutes

Agenda reports pack PDF 347 KB - Meetings, agendas, and minutes

Agenda reports pack PDF 347 KB - Meetings, agendas, and minutes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proposals for 2013/14 included inspecting all Social Care Organisations <strong>and</strong><br />

most Independent Health Care Organisations; dentists who had not already been<br />

inspected; pilot inspections of GP practices had started <strong>and</strong> these would be rolled out<br />

once methodology had been confirmed; making major changes to the way the NHS<br />

was inspected including actions arising from the Francis report; taking action where<br />

services were not good enough; <strong>and</strong> working with partner agencies. Reference was<br />

made to the significant organisational change for the CQC over the next 18 months.<br />

The CQC’s intentions to work with the Board were highlighted, the key being to<br />

have effective communication links <strong>and</strong> periodic updates. They would keep the Board<br />

up to date with their activity <strong>and</strong> wanted the Board to share any key themes or<br />

concerns with them. The goal was to share <strong>and</strong> use information/intelligence for the<br />

benefit of people who used the services.<br />

The Board questioned Ms Ward on a number of issues <strong>and</strong> responses were<br />

provided. Matters raised included:<br />

• The prioritisation of services to be inspected<br />

• The potential for raising concerns elsewhere e.g. the General Medical<br />

Council<br />

• The availability of information for Board members from the Warwickshire<br />

Inspection Team<br />

• The implications of the £20b savings to be made by NHS hospitals<br />

• The payment of fees <strong>and</strong> the scale for these charges<br />

• The considerations given to the views of patients/residents <strong>and</strong> staff<br />

• Links between Healthwatch <strong>and</strong> the CQC<br />

• Protection for whistle blowers<br />

• How the CQC raise issues where an organisation is compliant but the<br />

inspector still has concerns<br />

• How evidence is gathered<br />

• Further information about inspections involving patients/residents with mental<br />

health <strong>and</strong> physical needs<br />

• Joint inspections for cross boundary organisations<br />

• Further details about inspections at hospitals<br />

• The availability of information for members of the public.<br />

Councillor Townshend referred to CQC inspections at University Hospital<br />

Coventry <strong>and</strong> Warwickshire.<br />

RESOLVED that:<br />

(i) The intention to develop stronger links between the Scrutiny Board <strong>and</strong><br />

the CQC be noted.<br />

(ii) An update report be submitted to a future meeting of the Board in<br />

approximately six months to include the following:<br />

a) Any areas of concern for the CQC in Coventry<br />

b) Further details about the outcomes of the pilot inspections of GPs<br />

Page 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!