29.06.2015 Views

dadavani - Self Realization In 2 Hours

dadavani - Self Realization In 2 Hours

dadavani - Self Realization In 2 Hours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Questioner: But enough for the hunger<br />

signal. Enough for hunger only.<br />

Dadashri: Enough for the hunger only,<br />

nothing else after that. Other item should not<br />

come in this. There is no harm if there is<br />

shrikhand-puri. There is no problem even if<br />

there is basundi (heavy creamy milk dessert)<br />

puri.<br />

Questioner: Wherever there is<br />

basundi-puri in a dinner plate and you eat<br />

just enough for the hunger signal to stop. But<br />

then one thinks that he likes basundi, and<br />

adds more basundi until the stomach is ready<br />

to burst and even then, he takes the third<br />

bowl; is that considered ornamental?<br />

Dadashri: If the hunger is still there,<br />

why not eat the puris in the ornamental<br />

category?<br />

Questioner: No. The hunger is over.<br />

This is the talk after the hunger is no longer<br />

present.<br />

Dadashri: That is all ornamental. The<br />

hunger signal should be satisfied.<br />

Questioner: Whatever comes in the<br />

plate, there is no problem. It is only to<br />

complete the hunger, are we to proceed with<br />

such understanding only?<br />

Dadashri: You eat ten-twelve dishes of<br />

ice cream; you should not believe that it is for<br />

the satisfaction of hunger. There, hunger will<br />

not quench at all. That is all shokha (fondness;<br />

ardent desire, passion). It is not for the<br />

contentment of the hunger. It is not for the<br />

allaying of the signal of hunger (bhookha).<br />

Ornamental food means that which is fleshmass<br />

building (pushtikarak); if it is of that<br />

kind, then it is a problem.<br />

Questioner: Now, that which ruins<br />

DADAVANI<br />

one’s health should not be eaten; is that<br />

so?<br />

Dadashri: <strong>In</strong> worldly life interaction,<br />

that food which affects and harms your health<br />

should not be taken. However, after attaining<br />

this Gnan (<strong>Self</strong>-realization), if there is food<br />

that may hurt your health, then you may take<br />

it if you feel fine with it. Otherwise take less.<br />

If you eat less then you will not die!<br />

Questioner: Should we take food just<br />

enough to maintain awareness (jagruti)?<br />

Dadashri: Buffaloes would take<br />

excessive food. Buffaloes are free to take it in<br />

excess. Human beings do not have this freedom.<br />

Attachment-abhorrence exist due to<br />

opinion<br />

The senses (indriya) will definitely<br />

accept a mango if it is tasty. You will<br />

immediately grab it and start eating when it<br />

comes in front of you, but why does one<br />

remember the mango even after eating? That<br />

is because one has bound an opinion that,<br />

‘The mango is very tasty.’ The senses do not<br />

make you think about it; the poor senses will<br />

eat when you bring something in front of them.<br />

It is your opinion that causes attachment<br />

(raag) and abhorrence (dwesh). You become<br />

spontaneous and natural (sahaj) when you<br />

become free of opinions.<br />

Attachment and abhorrence happens<br />

the moment you bind an opinion. There is no<br />

attachment or abhorrence where there is no<br />

opinion.<br />

Main cause of hunger is dwesh<br />

Does a human being eat because of<br />

raag or because of dwesh? When one goes<br />

to eat, does he eat because of raag or<br />

because of dwesh?<br />

22 January 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!