03.07.2015 Views

Annual Reports - Northwestern Mutual

Annual Reports - Northwestern Mutual

Annual Reports - Northwestern Mutual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Large Cap Core Stock Portfolio<br />

Objective: Portfolio Strategy: Net Assets:<br />

Long-term growth of capital and income. Invest primarily in equity securities of large U.S. companies. $311 million<br />

Portfolio Overview<br />

Mason Street Advisors acts as the investment adviser for the Large Cap Core Stock Portfolio. The Portfolio seeks long-term<br />

growth of capital and income. The Portfolio seeks to achieve these objectives primarily by investing in the equity securities of<br />

companies selected for their high quality and growth potential. The Portfolio’s holdings will consist primarily of equity<br />

securities of large companies that may include both “growth” and “value” stocks. The Portfolio’s strategy is to actively<br />

manage a portfolio of selected equity securities with a goal of outperforming the total return of the S&P 500 ® Index. The<br />

Portfolio attempts to reduce risk by investing in many different economic sectors, industries and companies. The Portfolio’s<br />

manager may underweight or overweight selected economic sectors against the sector weightings of the S&P 500 ® Index to<br />

seek to enhance the Portfolio’s total return or reduce fluctuations in market value relative to the S&P 500 ® Index.<br />

Market Overview<br />

Financial markets endured a brutal 2008, which saw the failure of a number of leading financial institutions, credit markets<br />

freeze up, and the U.S. government take a series of extraordinary steps to support the economy and financial system. The crisis<br />

was a result of the ongoing sub-prime mortgage meltdown, which spread rapidly through the domestic financial sector and into<br />

virtually every segment of global financial markets. For all of 2008, returns for large-, medium- and small-sized companies<br />

were –37.60%, –41.46% and –33.79%, as measured by the Russell 1000, Russell MidCap and Russell 2000 Stock Indices,<br />

respectively. No sector of the market had positive returns for the year, and value-oriented stocks held up modestly better than<br />

growth stocks, as measured by the Russell style indices.<br />

Portfolio Results<br />

The Large Cap Core Stock Portfolio returned –38.74% for all of 2008. By comparison, the S&P 500 ® Index returned –37.00%.<br />

(This Index is unmanaged, cannot be invested in directly, and does not include administrative expenses or sales charges.) The<br />

Portfolio’s Large-Cap Core Funds peer group average return was –38.76%, according to Lipper Analytical Services, Inc., an<br />

independent mutual fund ranking agency.<br />

The Portfolio’s absolute return reflected the unprecedented turmoil affecting the economy and financial markets in what was<br />

the worst year for stocks since the Great Depression. In that environment, no sector contributed positively to results. Relative<br />

to the benchmark, the Portfolio’s underperformance was driven by positioning in the Energy and Industrials sectors. The<br />

leading contribution to relative return by far came from positioning in the Health Care sector.<br />

Relative to the benchmark, Energy shares detracted most, behind an underweight position in the big, integrated oil companies<br />

and an overweight to the equipment and services names. We favor the long-term industry dynamics and structural position of<br />

the service companies relative to the integrateds. Unfortunately, that positioning detracted during 2008, as the diversified oil<br />

companies held up better than the oil services firms. The leading detractors in this space were an underweight position in<br />

Exxon Mobil, and an overweight to equipment and services firm National Oilwell Varco.<br />

Another source of weakness was positioning in the Industrials sector. The leading detractors were manufacturers and parts<br />

suppliers tied to the market for commercial airliners and business jets. These were Textron and Spirit AeroSystems Holdings.<br />

We liked the backlog and book of business these companies touted; nevertheless, investors worried that slower economic<br />

growth would throttle demand for commercial jets.<br />

At the other end of the spectrum, our stock selection was most effective in the Health Care sector, behind positioning in the<br />

biotechnology segment. We favor biotechnology shares over big pharmaceutical names because biotech stocks tend not to<br />

have the same worries as pharma about patent expiries, generic competition, and modest new drug pipelines. The leading<br />

contributors in biotech were Gilead Sciences and Celgene. Gilead is the dominant player in the market for AIDS drugs, while<br />

Celgene offers best-in-class cancer drugs gaining approval for new applications.<br />

However, performance in the Health Care sector would have been better but for our underweight to pharmaceutical shares.<br />

These stocks generally held up well in 2008 because many investors viewed them as large, liquid safe haven plays.<br />

Nevertheless, our stake in Teva Pharmaceutical—a leading generic provider that has the potential to benefit from the<br />

increasing importance of generics in the health care industry—was a key contributor for the year. Selection and allocation<br />

decisions also contributed to relative results in the Telecommunication Services, Utilities, and Materials sectors.<br />

8 Large Cap Core Stock Portfolio

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!