05.07.2015 Views

The Stieltjes convolution and a functional calculus for non-negative ...

The Stieltjes convolution and a functional calculus for non-negative ...

The Stieltjes convolution and a functional calculus for non-negative ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This shows that the distribution in the following Definition 8 is well-defined<br />

<strong>and</strong> in D S (R + ) ′ .<br />

Definition 8 For two distributions S,T ∈ D S (R + ) ′ we define the <strong>convolution</strong><br />

S ∗ T ∈ D S (R + ) ′ by<br />

(S ∗ T)(ϕ) := ( (S ◦ τ) ∗ (T ◦ τ) ) (τ −1 ϕ) ∀ϕ ∈ D(R).<br />

Lemma 5 (i) <strong>The</strong> extended <strong>Stieltjes</strong> <strong>convolution</strong> in Definition 8 is commutative,<br />

associative.<br />

(ii) ∀S,T ∈ D S (R + ) ′ : S(S ∗ T) = S(S) · S(T)<br />

Proof: Commutativity follows directly from the definition <strong>and</strong> the commutativity<br />

of the <strong>convolution</strong> on D S ∗(R + ) ′ . For the last property we use representation<br />

(20) <strong>for</strong> the <strong>convolution</strong> on D S ∗(R + ) ′ <strong>and</strong> derive easily the analogous<br />

relation <strong>for</strong> all functions ϕ ∈ G(R + ) <strong>and</strong> distributions S,T ∈ D S (R + ) ′ with<br />

measures µ i k i<br />

from <strong>The</strong>orem 2. Following the lines of the proof in Lemma 4 we<br />

see that also in this general case we have S(S ∗T) = S(S)·S(T) <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

associativity. ✷<br />

<strong>The</strong> representation <strong>for</strong>mula (20) <strong>for</strong> the <strong>convolution</strong> on D S (R + ) ′ also shows<br />

that the <strong>convolution</strong> defined in Definition 8 coincides with the one from Definition<br />

7 in the case that both distributions S <strong>and</strong> T are in D S ∗(R + ) ′ .<br />

We now give a brief counterexample similar to the one mentioned in the introduction<br />

that shows that there are measures so that the product of their<br />

<strong>Stieltjes</strong> trans<strong>for</strong>ms is not the <strong>Stieltjes</strong> trans<strong>for</strong>m of any other measure.<br />

Example 1 δ 0 ∗ δ 0 = Dδ 0 .<br />

Proof: One can see that δ 0 is in D S (R + ) ′ but not in D S ∗(R + ) ′ . Its <strong>Stieltjes</strong><br />

trans<strong>for</strong>m is<br />

∫<br />

1<br />

S(δ 0 )(a) = dδ 0 (λ)<br />

R + λ + a = 1 a<br />

<strong>for</strong> ∀a > 0. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e we find that<br />

∫<br />

S(δ 0 ∗ δ 0 )(a) = S(δ 0 )(a) · S(δ 0 )(a) = 1 = 1! dδ<br />

a 2 0 (λ) ( ) 1+1<br />

1<br />

λ+a = S(Dδ0 )(a)<br />

R +<br />

<strong>for</strong> ∀a > 0, which shows that δ 0 ∗ δ 0 = Dδ 0 .<br />

✷<br />

Finally, we want to state that the <strong>convolution</strong> algebra does not have a neutral<br />

element I since this would need to fulfill S ∗ I = S <strong>for</strong> ∀S ∈ D S ∗(R n +) ′ <strong>and</strong><br />

there<strong>for</strong>e S(S) = S(S) · S(I) ⇒ S(I) ≡ 1. This is not possible because every<br />

<strong>Stieltjes</strong> trans<strong>for</strong>m tends to 0 with ⃗a → ∞.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!