09.07.2015 Views

Victor Frederick Weisskopf, 1908-2002 - Theoretical Physics at LBNL

Victor Frederick Weisskopf, 1908-2002 - Theoretical Physics at LBNL

Victor Frederick Weisskopf, 1908-2002 - Theoretical Physics at LBNL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VICTOR FREDERICK WEISSKOPFself-energy of the electron. Kramers had pointed out th<strong>at</strong>wh<strong>at</strong> is actually observable is the energy difference betweenfree and bound st<strong>at</strong>es of electrons. Viki’s demonstr<strong>at</strong>ionth<strong>at</strong> the divergence is only logarithmic made it plausibleth<strong>at</strong> differences would be finite and meaningful. Frenchand <strong>Weisskopf</strong> had not completed their calcul<strong>at</strong>ion when,in June 1947, Willis Lamb announced the results of hismicrowave experiments on hydrogen, showing a tiny disagreementwith existing theory, with a very small energydifference between two levels supposedly degener<strong>at</strong>e. Manytheorists pounced on this result, which became known asthe “Lamb shift.” Bethe quickly showed in a nonrel<strong>at</strong>ivisticcalcul<strong>at</strong>ion with a cutoff th<strong>at</strong> Kramer’s idea led to a levelshift close to th<strong>at</strong> measured by Lamb. His work depended,however, on the plausible but unproven assumption th<strong>at</strong>the logarithmic divergences <strong>at</strong> high energy exactly canceled.By early 1948 French and <strong>Weisskopf</strong> completed the firstconsistent calcul<strong>at</strong>ion of the Lamb shift, but Viki would notpublish because they had a very small disagreement withthe independent calcul<strong>at</strong>ions of Richard Feynman and JulianSchwinger, who agreed with each other. Viki could not believeth<strong>at</strong> his work with French was correct. Surely the twoyoung geniuses who were using their new and much morepowerful techniques had not made the same mistake. Butthey had! The upshot was th<strong>at</strong> French and <strong>Weisskopf</strong> publishedtheir year-old result (1949) only after a paper by Krolland Lamb appeared with essentially the same calcul<strong>at</strong>ion. 6The Kroll-Lamb theory paper contains a succinct st<strong>at</strong>ementabout Viki’s place in the firmament of theoreticalphysics: “[Our] calcul<strong>at</strong>ion,” they wrote, “[is] based on the1927-34 formul<strong>at</strong>ion of quantum electrodynamics due toDirac, Heisenberg, Pauli, and <strong>Weisskopf</strong>.” Despite or perhapsbecause of such praise, in his autobiography Viki indulgesin self-criticism. He laments th<strong>at</strong> he had not had the15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!