10.07.2015 Views

Response in Opposition to the Commonwealth's Motion to Vacate

Response in Opposition to the Commonwealth's Motion to Vacate

Response in Opposition to the Commonwealth's Motion to Vacate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and vacated a death sentence. Should <strong>the</strong> Commonwealth elect <strong>to</strong> properly appeal Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a'sorder vacat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> death sentence, an appeal it has not taken, <strong>the</strong> Court should review <strong>the</strong><strong>Commonwealth's</strong> appeal under its normal rules, with brief<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong> parties, an op<strong>in</strong>ion by <strong>the</strong>PCRA court, careful review of <strong>the</strong> PCRA court record, and, especially <strong>in</strong> this case, oral argument.From <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commonwealth's</strong> submission <strong>to</strong> this Court, one would th<strong>in</strong>k that Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>afound jurisdiction and constitutional error on a whim. Noth<strong>in</strong>g could be far<strong>the</strong>r from <strong>the</strong> truth.Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a spent many hours review<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sizable prior record <strong>in</strong> this case, from <strong>the</strong> trial andcapital sentenc<strong>in</strong>g, from earlier PCRA proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, and from federal court proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. JudgeSann<strong>in</strong>a spent many hours review<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> parties' written submissions, memoranda, plead<strong>in</strong>gs,motions and amendments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stant matter. Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a conducted an extensive <strong>in</strong> camerareview of documents created by <strong>the</strong> police and prosecu<strong>to</strong>r. Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a held several oralarguments regard<strong>in</strong>g jurisdiction, timel<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>the</strong> merits of <strong>the</strong> constitutional issues, and <strong>the</strong>appropriateness of grant<strong>in</strong>g a stay of execution. Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a held a lengthy evidentiary hear<strong>in</strong>g,at which she heard live testimony, assessed <strong>the</strong> witnesses' credibility, and received and reviewednumerous exhibits. Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a heard lengthy clos<strong>in</strong>g arguments on timel<strong>in</strong>ess, jurisdiction and<strong>the</strong> merits.Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a expressly followed this Court's precedent <strong>in</strong> cases such asCommonwealth v. Morris, 822 A.2d 684 (Pa. 2003), Commonwealth v. Morris, 771 A.2d 721 (Pa.2001), and Commonwealth v. Bennett, 930 A.2d 1264 (Pa. 2007), regard<strong>in</strong>gjurisdiction, timel<strong>in</strong>ess,stays of execution, when an evidentiary hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> assess <strong>the</strong>se procedural issues should be held, andwhat factual issues a PCRA court should address <strong>in</strong> cases such as this. Judge Sann<strong>in</strong>a also heeded<strong>the</strong> established precedent of <strong>the</strong> United States Supreme Court for cases of prose cut oria 1 misconductand governmental suppression of facts.Based upon her review of this massive record, live3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!