Response in Opposition to the Commonwealth's Motion to Vacate

More documents

Recommendations

Info

History:Com. v. Terrance WilliamsHugh.Sums to: patricia.johnsonCc: Billy-NolasThis message has been forwarded.09/28/201203:45 PM2 attachmentsWilliams, Terrance - SUP - PFR capital stay ord V2.pdfWiliiams T Order and Opinion 9 28 12.pdfMS. Johnson -- As explained when I called -- here is a pdf of the documentwe are filing in hard copy right about now, as well as of the PCRA court'sattached opinion and order of this date. Thanks, HB(See attached file: Williams, Terrance - SUP - PFR capital stay ord V2.pdf)(See attached file: Williams T Order and Opinion 9 28 12.pdf)
ATTACHMENT B
Page 1: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANI
Page 4 and 5: testimony, the parties' written sub
Page 6 and 7: alia, the original trial and capita
Page 8 and 9: inappropriate in any case, but it i
Page 10 and 11: that Mr. Draper told the prosecutin
Page 12 and 13: The Commonwealth, citing Commonweal
Page 14 and 15: 1. Government interference.Mr. Will
Page 16 and 17: knowledge ofMr. Draper's statements
Page 18 and 19: of assault with intent to murder, a
Page 20: As a prosecution witness ... , [Dra
Page 23 and 24: Judge Sarmina appropriately found t
Page 25 and 26: Norwood files Ms. Foulkes stated, "
Page 27 and 28: A. Yes.Q. How Mr. Norwood was kille
Page 29 and 30: There was additional undisclosed ev
Page 31 and 32: connect all of the dots." NT 9/2811
Page 33 and 34: e afforded relief as to the penalty
Page 35 and 36: himself would necessarily know that
Page 37 and 38: One, that all the requirements of t
Page 39 and 40: their findings and recommendations.
Page 41 and 42: Sexual Assault Resource and Counsel
Page 43 and 44: CONCLUSIONThe Commonwealth's motion
Page 45: ATTACHMENT A
Page 49 and 50: 3. Chief Justice Castille was the D
Page 51 and 52: INQUIRER (Oct. 21, 1993) (available
Page 53 and 54: allegation"); Beasley. 937 A.2d at
Page 55 and 56: was the District Attorney responsib
Page 57 and 58: Ripe for Disqualification. 52 Ariz.
Page 59 and 60: 1130,1134 (6th Cir.1969) (applying
Page 61 and 62: objective standards that govern rec
Page 63: Court's adoption of the following "

Response in Opposition to the Commonwealth's Motion to Vacate

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?