PAGE 16RHODE ISLAND TAX NEWSLEGAL CORNER: CASES (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 15)“The issue is not the location<strong>of</strong> the purchase <strong>of</strong> amotor vehicle but ratherwhether the purchaser . . .was a resident <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>at the time <strong>of</strong> purchase.”Because the <strong>tax</strong>payerin this case was a <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>resident at the time, the<strong>tax</strong>payer owes use <strong>tax</strong> to<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, plus interestand penalty, she said, citing<strong>RI</strong>GL § 44-18-20 and otherstatutes. Sullivan on October11, 2011, adopted the hearing<strong>of</strong>ficer’s decision andrecommendation.- Final Decision and OrderNo. 2011-19Historic <strong>tax</strong> creditThis complex case involved<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>’s historic <strong>tax</strong>credit under <strong>RI</strong>GL 44-22.3-4. At issue was whethercosts incurred by a relatedbusiness entity -- andmarked up to fair marketvalue in an intercompanytransaction -- were allowableas qualified rehabilitationexpense (QRE) under thelaw. If so, were there limitson how much such actualcosts can be marked up?The Tax <strong>Division</strong> arguedthat the QRE is determinedon the basis <strong>of</strong> actual costsincurred, not on fair marketvalue <strong>of</strong> the work performed.The Tax <strong>Division</strong>also argued that the projectcosts for a QRE must havesome economic substance orreality. (In this case, relatedparties were involved in thework.)The <strong>tax</strong>payer argued thatthe QRE was justified underthe law; there was no basisin law to question the transactionbecause <strong>of</strong> relatedparties; and that, anyway,the QRE in this case wasbased not on fair marketvalue but on the actual costto the <strong>tax</strong>payer.The redacted version <strong>of</strong> theAdministration Decisionsuggests the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficerrecommended that themark-up be reduced, to 10percent. (It was originallyclaimed at 29 percent.)Sullivan on December 1adopted the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer’sdecision and recommendation.- Final Decision and OrderNo. 2011-21Claim for refundAt issue was whether aclaim for refund for 2006,filed by a married couple,was timely filed under <strong>RI</strong>GL44-30-87.On December 22, 2010,the <strong>tax</strong>payers filed a nonresident2006 personal income<strong>tax</strong> return. Through the return,the <strong>tax</strong>payers sought arefund related to <strong>tax</strong> thathad been withheld on theirsales <strong>of</strong> real estate in 2006.The Tax <strong>Division</strong> said that arefund can be claimed twoyears from the date <strong>of</strong> payment,which under the statuteis deemed to be April 15following the <strong>tax</strong> year. So inthis matter, the claim wouldbe limited to two years fromApril 15, 2007. (The statutealso allows for a three-yearperiod from the point thereturn was filed -- in thiscase, December 22, 2010 --but refund would be limitedin such a situation to anypayments made within thethree-year period, and nosuch payments were made.)The wife testified that sheand her husband were bothdiagnosed with cancer in2006, were treated in 2007and 2008, and are still notcancer-free; they filed theirreturns late due to the illness,which consumed theirtime and energy and resultedin stress. The couple alsosuffered from deaths in thefamily during the time periodin question.The hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer ruledthat, “While both <strong>tax</strong>payerssuffered serious health issues,there are no provisionsin the statute that providefor any exemptions from thetime limits set by statute.”And while the <strong>tax</strong>payersargued for some human consideration,the law does notprovide for such considerationin administrative proceedings.Accordingly, therefund request was denied;Sullivan on December 16adopted the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer'srecommendation.- Final Decision and OrderNo. 2011-22(see also refund case No. 2011-20 )Tax on carAt issue is whether the <strong>tax</strong>payerowed use <strong>tax</strong> on a car.Under <strong>RI</strong>GL § 44-18-20, use<strong>tax</strong> is imposed on the<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Tax News providesonly summaries <strong>of</strong> some recent <strong>tax</strong>casedecisions, which are based onspecific facts and circumstances.Don’t rely on them for legal advice;they are merely informativeand provide general guidance.Consult your <strong>tax</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional if youhave a question or problem.“storage, use, or other consumptionin this state” <strong>of</strong>personal property, includingautomobiles.The <strong>tax</strong>payer said that,when he bought the car in2008, he was a resident <strong>of</strong>Maine, had a Maine homesteadexemption, and votesin Maine.The Tax <strong>Division</strong> arguedthat the <strong>tax</strong>payer was not abona fide nonresident becausehe owned <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>property in 2008, paidfor the car with <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>checks, and filed <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>resident returns for2000 through 2009.Only a bona fide <strong>Rhode</strong><strong>Island</strong> nonresident who doesnot register the vehicle instatedoes not have to pay<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>tax</strong> on a vehicle,the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficerfound, ruling that the <strong>tax</strong>payerowed use <strong>tax</strong>, interestand penalty. Sullivan on December16 adopted the recommendation.- Final Decision and OrderNo. 2011-23
A NEWSLETTER FOR TAXPAYERS AND PRACTITIONERSPAGE 17NEWSLETTER POLICY<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Tax News is a <strong>news</strong>letter from the <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Revenue’s <strong>Division</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>Taxation</strong>. It is typically published each quarter. Its purpose is to provide <strong>tax</strong>payersand <strong>tax</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals with general information regarding <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>tax</strong> laws, regulationsand procedures. It is neither designed nor intended to address complex issues in detail.Nothing contained in this <strong>news</strong>letter in any way alters or otherwise changes any provisions<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> General Laws, regulations <strong>of</strong> the Tax <strong>Division</strong>, or formal rulings. TheTax <strong>Division</strong> is at One Capitol Hill, Providence, <strong>RI</strong> 02908. Its website is www.<strong>tax</strong>.ri.<strong>gov</strong>.SUBSC<strong>RI</strong>BE<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Tax News is distributed free, by e-mail, to those who have joined our listserv. If youare not on our listserv but would like to join, send an email to Susan.Galvin@<strong>tax</strong>.ri.<strong>gov</strong> withthe word SUBSC<strong>RI</strong>BE in uppercase in the subject block.COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONSIf you have comments or suggestions for <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Tax News, please e-mail its editor, NeilDowning: Neil.Downing@<strong>tax</strong>.ri.<strong>gov</strong>BACK ISSUESBack issues <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Tax News are archived on the <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Division</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Taxation</strong>website:http://www.<strong>tax</strong>.ri.<strong>gov</strong>/<strong>news</strong>letter/index.phpContributorsThe following people associated with theTax <strong>Division</strong> contributed to this issue:Barbara BissonJames V. CambioMichael F. CanolePhil D’AmbraDonna DubeDonald W. EnglertRaymond A. FilipponeLuisa FinelliJames M. GalvinSusan M. GalvinPaul H. GuertinCharles J. LarocqueMatthew LawlorLeo LebeufBernard J. LemosGail McNameePeter McVayJacques MoreauLinda C. RiendeauDavid M. SullivanRegulatory updateThe <strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Division</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Taxation</strong> has taken a number <strong>of</strong> regulatory actions in recent months.For example, the Tax <strong>Division</strong>:Adopted a new rule, Regulation CT 11-15, “Combined Reporting (pro forma),” which essentiallyapplies to the 2010 and 2011 <strong>tax</strong> years;Filed Regulation SU 11-114, “Use Tax - Payment by Purchasers,” which took effect December1, 2011, and amends and supersedes an identically named regulation, SU 95-114;Filed Regulation SST 11-01, “Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement,” effective December1, 2011; Filed Regulation SU 11-91, “Records Requirements”, which took effect December 1, 2011,and which amends and supersedes Regulation SU 89-91, “Records”; andFiled Regulation SU 11-20, “Registration and Collection <strong>of</strong> Sales and Use Tax by Retailers,”which took effect December 1, 2011, amends and supersedes Regulation SU 90-20, “Out-<strong>of</strong>-State Retailers – Registration,” and incorporates the contents <strong>of</strong> Regulation SU 87-21,“Collection <strong>of</strong> Tax by Retailers.”All regulations are available at the Tax <strong>Division</strong>’s website.<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Division</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Taxation</strong>One Capitol HillProvidence, R.I. 02908Phone: 401-574-8829Fax: 401-574-8917www.<strong>tax</strong>.ri.<strong>gov</strong>Pay <strong>tax</strong> onlineElectronic Funds Transfer (EFT)lets business <strong>tax</strong>payers make payments<strong>of</strong> sales, withholding, andother <strong>tax</strong>es electronically, via theACH network. Click here formore information.