10.07.2015 Views

alabama's working families and the broken promise of economic ...

alabama's working families and the broken promise of economic ...

alabama's working families and the broken promise of economic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POLICY AGENDABridging <strong>the</strong> gap with stronger workforce supportsChild careAlong with lack <strong>of</strong> transportation, lack <strong>of</strong> access toquality child care is consistently cited as a leadingbarrier to employment for low-income <strong>families</strong>.Alabama could improve its child care program byincreasing state funding to accommodate <strong>the</strong> waitinglist for services <strong>and</strong> by eliminating <strong>the</strong> requiredco-pay for <strong>families</strong> with incomes below <strong>the</strong> federalpoverty level. The state could greatly improve<strong>the</strong> accessibility <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> services receivedby children in child care programs by increasingprovider reimbursements to match program costsmore closely.[ Alabama should increase its investment inquality child care programs by increasing <strong>the</strong>reimbursement to a minimum <strong>of</strong> 50 percent <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> fair market rate.[ Alabama should eliminate <strong>the</strong> co-pay for<strong>families</strong> with incomes below <strong>the</strong> federal povertylevel.[ Alabama should increase its commitment <strong>of</strong>state dollars to reduce <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> eligible childrenon a waiting list for available child care.Health careMore than 63,000 low-income <strong>working</strong> <strong>families</strong>have at least one parent without health insurance.Eligibility for Medicaid for Low-Income Families(MLIF) limits monthly income to <strong>the</strong> equivalent <strong>of</strong>26 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poverty threshold. Time lost fromwork because <strong>of</strong> illness hinders both <strong>the</strong> individual’sability to meet financial responsibilities <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> employer’s ability to meet productivity st<strong>and</strong>ards.Policymakers need to take action to begin toaddress <strong>the</strong> health insurance crisis in our state.[ Alabama should implement financial incentivesthat encourage small employers to provide healthcare benefits to <strong>the</strong>ir employees <strong>and</strong> <strong>families</strong>.[ Alabama should raise <strong>the</strong> income cap forMedicaid participation by <strong>working</strong> <strong>families</strong> to130 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federal poverty level (equalto <strong>the</strong> income cap for Food Stamps).Unemployment InsuranceAlabama provides one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation’s lowestmaximum benefits to eligible workers. Loss <strong>of</strong>employment, in <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> itself, can be devastatingto an individual. The inability to meet even basicneeds can drive a family into financial ruin fromwhich <strong>the</strong>y may never recover.[ Alabama should increase <strong>the</strong> maximumweekly benefits allowed under its unemploymentcompensation program to <strong>the</strong>Sou<strong>the</strong>astern U.S. average.TaxesAlabama relies on a regressive tax system thatplaces a disproportionate burden on low-income<strong>working</strong> <strong>families</strong>.[ Alabama should remove <strong>the</strong> state sales taxfrom grocery purchases.[ Alabama should raise <strong>the</strong> threshold forstate income tax to <strong>the</strong> federal poverty levelby modifying dependent <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deductions.Those changes should be indexed toinflation to ensure ongoing tax fairness.TransportationRising energy costs hit low-income <strong>families</strong> particularlyhard, <strong>and</strong> in many areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state, <strong>the</strong>yhave no options available o<strong>the</strong>r than using <strong>the</strong>irpersonal vehicle to seek work <strong>and</strong>, once employed,get to work regularly. A comprehensive state publictransportation policy with state financialsupport to local entities would <strong>of</strong>fer low-incomeworkers both reliable transportation <strong>and</strong> a widerradius <strong>of</strong> employment opportunities. In addition,a state-supported transit system would benefit allAlabamians by reducing dem<strong>and</strong>s on <strong>the</strong> state’shighway infrastructure <strong>and</strong> improving urban <strong>and</strong>suburban air quality.[ Alabama should provide a dedicated staterevenue source for public transportation programsthroughout <strong>the</strong> state.Alabama’s Working Families 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!