10.07.2015 Views

Smoking and Nurses in NEW ZEALAND - ASH

Smoking and Nurses in NEW ZEALAND - ASH

Smoking and Nurses in NEW ZEALAND - ASH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foreword<strong>Nurses</strong> make an essential contribution to the health of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> public. We are well-respected <strong>and</strong>trusted health professionals. New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s greatest preventable public health problem is death <strong>and</strong> diseasecaused by smok<strong>in</strong>g. Many nurses promote smokefree lifestyles <strong>and</strong> help clients quit. However, the <strong>in</strong>clusionof this <strong>in</strong> all nurses’ skill sets <strong>and</strong> practice presents a challenge.<strong>Nurses</strong> have the largest reach of any group of health professionals. We work <strong>in</strong> public health <strong>and</strong> primary,secondary <strong>and</strong> tertiary sett<strong>in</strong>gs. We work with healthy families <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals from every sector of society,as well as with those who are unwell. We support <strong>and</strong> work alongside other nurses <strong>and</strong> health professionals.Evidence-based <strong>in</strong>terventions, health promotion, client education <strong>and</strong> professional development are vitalelements of nurs<strong>in</strong>g. The evidence base for nurse delivery of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments is sound. Despitethis, it seems that the potential of nurses to deliver effective smokefree <strong>in</strong>terventions has not been realised.We recognise <strong>in</strong> the health sector that action encourag<strong>in</strong>g nurses to promote a smokefree approach <strong>in</strong> theirwork requires underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of their needs <strong>and</strong> barriers to practice. This report helps to beg<strong>in</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g thatknowledge gap. It presents a positive picture of an enthusiastic committed workforce eager to support clients<strong>and</strong> for more education <strong>and</strong> time to deliver smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions. However, few nurses reportedreceiv<strong>in</strong>g education about smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> their <strong>in</strong>itial or post-graduate study. This is ofconcern because providers of nurse education have a major impact on the attitudes <strong>and</strong> expectations ofnurses <strong>and</strong> their practice.The further challenge for our profession is to support nurses who smoke <strong>in</strong> their efforts to quit, <strong>and</strong> to buildon the enthusiasm of the nurses <strong>in</strong> this national study for more education <strong>and</strong> for <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g smokefree work <strong>in</strong>their practice. This will resonate with the work of others <strong>in</strong> the health care sector, <strong>and</strong> should result <strong>in</strong> positivepopulation health outcomes.Mark JonesChief Advisor Nurs<strong>in</strong>gSector Capability & Innovation DirectorateM<strong>in</strong>istry of HealthNew Zeal<strong>and</strong>


AppendicesAppendix A: Nurse advocacy groups; <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cessation guidel<strong>in</strong>es; <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cessation 35tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for nurses; National smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation service providersAppendix B: <strong>ASH</strong>-KAN questionnaire 36Appendix C: <strong>Nurses</strong>’ knowledge of smok<strong>in</strong>g related issues 42Appendix D: Attitudes <strong>and</strong> beliefs about smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> nurse practice 43Appendix E: Likelihood of nurse referrals to smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation services 44Appendix F: Prevalence of nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g by gender <strong>and</strong> area of work, 2006 Census 45TablesTable 1: Socio-demographic <strong>and</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g characteristics of respondents 17Table 2: Percentage of nurses who have received smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 19Table 3: Nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation practice 20Table 4: Percentage of nurses who believe <strong>in</strong> the effectiveness of proven <strong>and</strong> unproven 21smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationTable 5: Nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g status by gender, 2006 census 22FiguresFigure 1: Nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g status by gender, 2006 census 23Figure 2: Census trends, prevalence of nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g by gender 23Figure 3: Prevalence of nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g by area of work, 2006 census 24


Summary✜ BackgroundCigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g is the lead<strong>in</strong>g cause of preventable death <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2004). Nurseled smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions are congruent with an evidence-based approach to nurs<strong>in</strong>g care, <strong>and</strong>with the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council’s scopes of practice for nurses (The Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>,2004). Because nurses work <strong>in</strong> a wide range of sett<strong>in</strong>gs they are well-placed to provide support for smokefreeenvironments. Little is known about the knowledge, attitudes <strong>and</strong> practices of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> nurses towardsprovid<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice <strong>and</strong> support for smokefree environments.✜ Aims• To assess the knowledge of cessation, attitudes towards smok<strong>in</strong>g, the provision of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationadvice <strong>and</strong> treatment, <strong>and</strong> attitudes to <strong>and</strong> management of smokefree workplaces <strong>in</strong> a sample ofnurses with practis<strong>in</strong>g certificates <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.• To describe the prevalence of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nurses us<strong>in</strong>g the 2006 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> census.✜ MethodsOne thous<strong>and</strong> questionnaires were posted to a r<strong>and</strong>om sample of 1000 nurses (500 community-basednurses, <strong>and</strong> 500 hospital-based) from the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council register of nurses with currentpractis<strong>in</strong>g certificates.Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong> provided results from the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Census of Population <strong>and</strong> Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs, 2006,for nurses by gender, practice area <strong>and</strong> cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g status (Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2007a)✜ ResultsSurvey results: Responses were received from 371 (37%) of the nurses. They were enthusiastic about<strong>and</strong> committed to <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong> their practice, <strong>and</strong> to learn<strong>in</strong>g more about help<strong>in</strong>g clientswho smoke. N<strong>in</strong>e out of ten felt that it was part of their responsibility to advise clients to stop smok<strong>in</strong>g. Nearlyn<strong>in</strong>e out of ten said they would be happy to spend an extra five m<strong>in</strong>utes with each patient who smoked if theycould effectively <strong>in</strong>tervene. Over half had not received tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for effective evidence-based smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation<strong>in</strong>terventions but three quarters were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g more about how to help people stop smok<strong>in</strong>g.The respondents’ knowledge of the health effects of smok<strong>in</strong>g was high, but there were gaps <strong>in</strong> knowledge<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 7


of effective smok<strong>in</strong>g treatments <strong>and</strong> a wide misunderst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that nicot<strong>in</strong>e causes cancer <strong>and</strong> heart disease.These gaps may limit nurses’ ability to <strong>in</strong>tervene effectively. <strong>Nurses</strong> supported their smokefree work policiesalthough a fifth did not report support with enforc<strong>in</strong>g these.Census 2006 results: Results from the 2006 census showed that smok<strong>in</strong>g prevalence among nurseshas decl<strong>in</strong>ed from 18% <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 14% <strong>in</strong> 2006. <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> rates <strong>in</strong> mental health nurses (29%) rema<strong>in</strong> higherthan the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> general population (21%, census data).8<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


Recommendations✜ Recommendations for nurses• Support nurses who wish to stop smok<strong>in</strong>g• Integrate ask<strong>in</strong>g about smok<strong>in</strong>g, provid<strong>in</strong>g brief advice to stop smok<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g an offer ofsmok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatment <strong>in</strong>to nurse practice [New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Guidel<strong>in</strong>es(http://www.moh.govt.nz)]• Include promotion of smokefree workplaces <strong>and</strong> client environments <strong>in</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g practice• Advocate for tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to use the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Guidel<strong>in</strong>es (http://www.moh.govt.nz)<strong>in</strong> nurse practice• Advocate for advanced smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for nurses• Monitor <strong>and</strong> evaluate nurse practice with regard to smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> smokefree environments• Advocate for direct fund<strong>in</strong>g of nurses for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> for nurse delivery of smok<strong>in</strong>gcessation advice <strong>and</strong> treatments• Acknowledge smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> tobacco control as a specialty nurse area of practice• Form a nurses’ smokefree advocacy group• Advocate for nurse representation on tobacco control action groups✜ Recommendations for employers• Support nurses who smoke to stop• Expect nurs<strong>in</strong>g staff to be able to ask about smok<strong>in</strong>g, provide brief advice to stop smok<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> makean offer of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatment• Articulate the need for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nurse education to Schools of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g,the Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Tertiary Education Commission• Allow time for nurses to deliver <strong>and</strong> follow up smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions• Provide smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g• Support smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions with nationally consistent systems that record the smok<strong>in</strong>gstatus of clients <strong>and</strong> monitor <strong>and</strong> evaluate progress• Support nurses with promot<strong>in</strong>g smokefree work environments<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 9


✜ Recommendations for nurs<strong>in</strong>g education <strong>and</strong> research• Ensure the Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>ates smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all under-graduateeducation programmes• Empower all nurses to provide an effective brief <strong>in</strong>tervention by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> undergraduateeducation• Include basic <strong>and</strong> advanced smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> new–graduate <strong>and</strong> post-graduate coursesfor nurses• Conduct qualitative, quantitative <strong>and</strong> evaluation research to <strong>in</strong>form nurs<strong>in</strong>g practice <strong>and</strong> tobacco control<strong>in</strong> the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> context✜ The tobacco control workforce• Partner with nurses at all levels for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> tobacco control <strong>in</strong>terventions, networks,activism, education <strong>and</strong> research✜ Recommendations for the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health• Prioritise upskill<strong>in</strong>g the nurs<strong>in</strong>g workforce with smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g• Fund nurses directly to deliver smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments• Fund smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for nurses• Monitor the number of nurses receiv<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, their level of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> the use<strong>and</strong> effect of this tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g• Consult <strong>and</strong> engage with bodies represent<strong>in</strong>g nurses such as the Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>,the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Nurses</strong> Organisation <strong>and</strong> other unions about decision mak<strong>in</strong>g concern<strong>in</strong>g upskill<strong>in</strong>gthe nurse workforce <strong>and</strong> nurse participation <strong>in</strong> tobacco control <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation work10<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


1. IntroductionThis report describes the smok<strong>in</strong>g prevalence of nurses <strong>in</strong> Aotearoa/New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>es theirsmok<strong>in</strong>g history, knowledge, attitudes, <strong>and</strong> practice related to smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> smokefree workplaces.In New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, tobacco smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> exposure to tobacco smoke cause some 5,000 deaths annually(M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2006). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contributes to health <strong>in</strong>equalities for Maori <strong>and</strong> Pacific peoples <strong>and</strong> thosewith lower <strong>in</strong>comes (Blakely et al, 2006; M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2004). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence is higher <strong>in</strong> people withmental illness than <strong>in</strong> those without mental illness (Oakley Browne et al, 2006). The New Zeal<strong>and</strong> governmenthas responded to the seriousness of the issue with a range of tobacco control programmes but not all healthprofessionals participate effectively.Stopp<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g is the best th<strong>in</strong>g a person can do to reduce their risk of cardiovascular disease <strong>and</strong> cancer.<strong>Nurses</strong> play a vital role <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the health of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> population. They have thepotential to be the largest workforce <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g effective smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions, <strong>and</strong>to be powerful advocates for tobacco free homes <strong>and</strong> communities.<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 11


2. <strong>Nurses</strong> <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g✜ 2.1 Nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> tobacco controlTobacco control means implement<strong>in</strong>g a range of supply, dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> harm reduction strategies that aimto improve the health of a population by prevent<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g uptake, promot<strong>in</strong>g quitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>gnonsmokers from exposure to secondh<strong>and</strong> tobacco smoke (World Health Organisation, 2003).<strong>Nurses</strong> form the largest health professional group <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. In March 2006 there were 44,442 nurseswith current practis<strong>in</strong>g certificates, one for every fourteen regular smokers (Clark & Ayl<strong>in</strong>g, 2006; StatisticsNew Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2007b). <strong>Nurses</strong> with practis<strong>in</strong>g certificates <strong>in</strong>clude expert nurse practitioners (0.05%), registerednurses (90%), <strong>and</strong> nurse assistants <strong>and</strong> enrolled nurses (9%) (Clark & Ayl<strong>in</strong>g, 2006). Registered nurses workwith<strong>in</strong> a competency framework that acknowledges the different health <strong>and</strong> socio-economic status of Maori<strong>and</strong> non-Maori, cultural safety, promotion of healthy environments <strong>and</strong> health education (The Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Councilof New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2005). These are all elements of tobacco control. The role of nurses <strong>and</strong> their holistic focusenable them to <strong>in</strong>clude smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> promotion of smokefree environments <strong>in</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g care at alllevels of the cont<strong>in</strong>uum of health <strong>and</strong> illness (Jones & McLachlan, 2006). Enrolled nurses <strong>and</strong> nurse assistantsassist registered nurses <strong>and</strong> work with<strong>in</strong> their own scope of practice <strong>and</strong> levels of competence (The Nurs<strong>in</strong>gCouncil of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2004). These are compatible with the professional development opportunities offeredby smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> practice.There are many nurses <strong>in</strong> the dedicated smokefree workforce <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Examples <strong>in</strong>clude nurseslead<strong>in</strong>g coord<strong>in</strong>ation of smokefree policy implementation <strong>in</strong> District Health Boards <strong>and</strong> nurses who work forsmok<strong>in</strong>g cessation providers. Other nurses <strong>in</strong>tegrate smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>to their everyday nurs<strong>in</strong>g workor have a special <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> tobacco control (Emmanuel, 2007; McLeod et al, 2005; Town et al, 2000).<strong>Nurses</strong> are well placed to promote smokefree lifestyles to youth, help clients quit <strong>and</strong> promote smokefreeenvironments (Andrews & Heath, 2003). They work <strong>in</strong> primary care sett<strong>in</strong>gs where healthy people live <strong>and</strong>work (for example schools, prisons <strong>and</strong> workplaces) as well as with people seek<strong>in</strong>g help for health relatedissues. They work with people of all ages. They visit people <strong>in</strong> their homes <strong>and</strong> also see them at times whenclients are receptive to advice to quit such as when they are hospitalized for cardiovascular disease (Rice &Stead, 2004). <strong>Nurses</strong> have opportunities to engage with family members who smoke <strong>and</strong> offer support tothem for quitt<strong>in</strong>g to improve their health as well as to protect the health of their families (Jones & McLachlan,2006). They often <strong>in</strong>teract with clients for some time, offer<strong>in</strong>g opportunities to provide follow-up support.<strong>Nurses</strong> support <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary teamwork by provid<strong>in</strong>g clients’ with smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice <strong>and</strong> treatment.In a recent survey, 65% of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> general practitioners (GPs) reported that their second choice ofreferral for cessation support for clients was to practice nurses (Glover et al, 2007).12<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


There have been calls for nurses to participate <strong>in</strong> tobacco control activities nationally <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally(Andrews & Heath, 2003; Campbell, 2005; Durk<strong>in</strong>, 2007; Jaireth et al, 2003; Malone, 2006; Percival et al,2003). There are <strong>in</strong>ternational advocacy groups for nurses aimed at support<strong>in</strong>g nurses with provid<strong>in</strong>gcessation services to clients, support<strong>in</strong>g nurses <strong>and</strong> student nurses to quit smok<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>volvementof nurses <strong>in</strong> tobacco control activism, research <strong>and</strong> education (see Appendix A).✜ 2.2 The evidence base of nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationEvidence-based action is <strong>in</strong>tegral to nurs<strong>in</strong>g care. There is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g evidence that smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> exposureto environmental tobacco smoke are related to ill health <strong>and</strong> death (Woodward & Laugesen, 2001; Peto et al,1994). Evidence about the benefits of quitt<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> the effectiveness of <strong>in</strong>terventions to quit is well established(Doll et al, 2004; M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2007; Raw et al, 1998). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cessation advice by nurses is effective.A Cochrane systematic review on nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation exam<strong>in</strong>ed the results of twentystudies <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the effect of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice from a nurse compared to no <strong>in</strong>tervention. Thisshowed that nurse advice to stop smok<strong>in</strong>g was likely to stop people from smok<strong>in</strong>g for at least six months,although more <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>terventions had the greatest effect (Rice & Stead, 2004).The recent revision of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Guidel<strong>in</strong>es makes recommendations for the useof evidence-based <strong>in</strong>terventions for all health professionals (see Appendix A). Approximately 1 <strong>in</strong> 40 peoplewho would not otherwise have stopped smok<strong>in</strong>g will do so for at least six months after receiv<strong>in</strong>g brief adviceto stop smok<strong>in</strong>g. While the r<strong>and</strong>omized trials used to determ<strong>in</strong>e this were based on physician advice, clearadvice from nurses is likely to benefit clients (M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2007).✜ 2.3 Barriers to nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions for tobacco controlThere is little debate over the key role nurses have to play <strong>in</strong> the provision of advice to quit, <strong>in</strong> addition tosmok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatment to smokers. However, like other health professionals, not all nurses providehelp (Glover et al, 2007; Pullon et al, 2004). There are a number of reasons for this.Attitudes <strong>and</strong> knowledge towards smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation have an important effect on assess<strong>in</strong>gsmok<strong>in</strong>g status, giv<strong>in</strong>g brief advice, <strong>and</strong> the provision or referral for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatment by healthprofessionals (Nagle et al, 1999; Slater et al, 2006). A survey of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> midwives found that althoughthe majority see the provision of advice as an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of their job, only half provided this advice topregnant women who smoke (Pullon et al, 2004).<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 13


There is also evidence that nurses who are current smokers are more likely to underestimate the healthconsequences of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> therefore less likely to provide clear smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice (Slater et al,2006). Nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g prevalence is highest among those work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mental health (29% <strong>in</strong> 2006) wheresmok<strong>in</strong>g prevalence is high among clients (Lawn & Pols, 2005; Oakley Browne et al, 2006; Statistics NewZeal<strong>and</strong>, 2007a).Well<strong>in</strong>gton nurses tra<strong>in</strong>ed for the Can Quit Practice general practice based smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation programmeidentified <strong>in</strong>adequate fund<strong>in</strong>g for practice nurses’ time, high workload, lack of autonomy, <strong>and</strong> limited practicewidecommitment to smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation as barriers to smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatment delivery (Pullon et al, 2005).In 2004, all District Health Boards took steps to become completely smokefree. <strong>Nurses</strong> directly <strong>in</strong>teract withpatients <strong>and</strong> visitors who wish to smoke <strong>and</strong> must manage the care of heavily addicted <strong>and</strong> very sick patientswho want to smoke. Residential mental health sett<strong>in</strong>gs are exempt (Smoke-free Environments Amendment Act,2003). District Health Board efforts to protect non-smokers from environmental tobacco smoke <strong>and</strong> supportquitt<strong>in</strong>g by staff <strong>and</strong> clients <strong>in</strong>clude work<strong>in</strong>g towards completely smokefree mental health environments by 2010<strong>and</strong> restrictions on smok<strong>in</strong>g to specific outside areas <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g rooms (Emmanuel, 2007).In view of the potential role nurses have <strong>in</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> support for smokefree environments, <strong>and</strong>the known barriers to nurses provid<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice <strong>and</strong> treatment, <strong>ASH</strong> (Action on <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> Health)collaborated with the University of Auckl<strong>and</strong>, AUT University’s School of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Nurses</strong>Organisation on research to <strong>in</strong>form the development of a nurse advocacy group. <strong>ASH</strong> sponsored a SummerStudentship Project at the University of Auckl<strong>and</strong> to ga<strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to knowledge <strong>and</strong> attitudes towardssmok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> nurses. The 2006 Census data on smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nurses wereanalysed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the national prevalence of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nurses.✜ 2.4 Aims• To assess the knowledge of the health risks of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> benefits of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation, attitudestowards smok<strong>in</strong>g, the provision of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice <strong>and</strong> treatment, <strong>and</strong> attitudes to <strong>and</strong>management of smokefree workplaces <strong>in</strong> a sample of registered nurses <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.• To describe the prevalence of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nurses us<strong>in</strong>g the 2006 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> census.14<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


3. MethodsOne thous<strong>and</strong> questionnaires were posted to a r<strong>and</strong>om sample of 1000 nurses (500 community-basednurses, <strong>and</strong> 500 hospital-based) from the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council register of nurses with currentpractis<strong>in</strong>g certificates. Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong> provided results from the 2006 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Census ofPopulations <strong>and</strong> Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs for nurses by gender, practice area <strong>and</strong> cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g status.✜ 3.1 Survey3.1.1 Questionnaire developmentA simple paper based questionnaire was developed to assess nurses’ knowledge of the health risks ofsmok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> benefits of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation, their attitudes towards smok<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> their provision of smok<strong>in</strong>gcessation advice <strong>and</strong> treatment. Other surveys were exam<strong>in</strong>ed (Glover et al, 2007), <strong>and</strong> a brief literaturesearch was undertaken to identify <strong>in</strong>ternational literature that reported on these data <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>form questionnairedevelopment. The questionnaire was comprised of items that assessed demographic data; smok<strong>in</strong>g history;knowledge of the health risks of smok<strong>in</strong>g, the benefits of quitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> evidence-based smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation<strong>in</strong>terventions; attitudes to smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation; smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation activity <strong>and</strong> if they had receivedsmok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g policies <strong>in</strong> their places of work (see Appendix B).The questionnaire items assess<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>and</strong> attitudes were generally assessed on a 5-po<strong>in</strong>t Likertscale. For example, one question asked the respondent to rate their agreement to the statement: “It is partof my responsibility to advise my patients to quit smok<strong>in</strong>g.” A rat<strong>in</strong>g of ‘1’ is that they strongly disagree withthat statement. A rat<strong>in</strong>g of ‘5’ is that they strongly agreed with that statement. If they were unsure or feltneutral with regard to a certa<strong>in</strong> question they could answer ‘3’.Approval for this project was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the University of Auckl<strong>and</strong> Human Participants Ethics Committee.3.1.2 Participants <strong>and</strong> recruitmentThe questionnaire was sent with a letter of <strong>in</strong>vitation, a consent form <strong>and</strong> a prepaid envelope. Potentialparticipants were <strong>in</strong>structed to read the <strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the letter of <strong>in</strong>vitation, complete the <strong>in</strong>formedconsent <strong>and</strong> questionnaire <strong>and</strong> return these to the study team <strong>in</strong> the prepaid envelope.One thous<strong>and</strong> questionnaire packages were sent to the Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> who posted theseto a r<strong>and</strong>om sample of 1000 nurse practitioners, registered nurses, enrolled nurses <strong>and</strong> nurse assistants (500community-based <strong>and</strong> 500 hospital-based). The Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council database was used to generate the r<strong>and</strong>om<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 15


sample from the lists of all those with practis<strong>in</strong>g certificates. <strong>Nurses</strong> who did not <strong>in</strong>dicate they worked <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ical areas of practice were excluded. Any nurse who appeared <strong>in</strong> both the community based <strong>and</strong> hospitalbased lists was r<strong>and</strong>omly replaced. For the analysis, multiple entries for ethnicity were reduced to a s<strong>in</strong>glecategory us<strong>in</strong>g Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s prioritisation st<strong>and</strong>ard (Maori, Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong>, Asian, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>European/Pakeha, other European).This was a ‘one-off’ survey with no follow-up of non-responders. An <strong>in</strong>centive was offered to encouragecompletion <strong>and</strong> return of the questionnaire. All those who responded were entered <strong>in</strong>to a draw for an AppleiPod Nano.3.1.3 Statistical considerationsData from the returned surveys were entered <strong>in</strong>to, <strong>and</strong> analysed with, SPSS version 10.✜ 3.2 CensusCensus data were used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g status. Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong> provided 2006 censusresults for nurses by gender, practice area <strong>and</strong> cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g status.The census <strong>in</strong>formation about occupation is collected for New Zeal<strong>and</strong> residents aged 15 <strong>and</strong> over. It refers tothe paid employment that people work the most hours <strong>in</strong>. The nurse practice areas provided were coded byStatistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong> to both the 1999 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard Classification of Occupations (NZSCO99)<strong>and</strong> the 2006 Australian <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) (Statistics NewZeal<strong>and</strong>, nda).The 2006 census <strong>in</strong>formation about cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g status for New Zeal<strong>and</strong> residents aged 15 <strong>and</strong> overwas collected us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g questions:1. Do you smoke cigarettes regularly (that is one or more a day?)(DON’T count pipes, cigars or cigarillos. Count only tobacco cigarettes)Response options: Yes No2. Have you ever been a regular smoker that is one or more a day?Response options: Yes No(Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, ndb).Census data were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g Microsoft Excel.16<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


4. Results✜ 4.1 Survey results4.1.1 DemographicsA total of 371 (37%) nurses responded to the postal survey. The majority was female (95%). Most nurses identifiedthemselves as New Zeal<strong>and</strong> European (83%). Only 3% identified as Maori. The age distribution is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.The respondents were almost all registered nurses (93%) <strong>and</strong> most (64%) had been practis<strong>in</strong>g for greater than 15 years.✜ Table 1: Socio-demographic <strong>and</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g characteristics of respondentsSex (N=370) % %Female 95 Male 5Ethnicity (N=368) % %New Zeal<strong>and</strong> European/Pakeha 83 Maori 3Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong> 2 Asian 4Other European 7 Other 1Age (N=368) % %16-34 19 35-54 5755 + 24Nurs<strong>in</strong>g registration (N=368) % %Registered nurse 93 Enrolled nurse or nurse assistant 6Nurse practitioner 1Years of practice (N=367) % %Less than 12 months 1 1-5 years 106-10 years 11 11-15 years 13Over 15 years 64Area of work (N=367) % %Assessment & rehabilitation 3Child health 6 Nurs<strong>in</strong>g education 2Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g care 5 Obstetrics 3District nurs<strong>in</strong>g 9 Occupational health 3Emergency 4 Palliative care 2Family plann<strong>in</strong>g 1 Peri-operative care 4Intensive care 2 Primary healthcare 30Mental health 4 Public health 4Medical 6 Surgical 7Nurs<strong>in</strong>g adm<strong>in</strong>istration 2 Other 3<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 17


A wide range of nurs<strong>in</strong>g specialties is shown, with the greatest percentage of nurses work<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> primaryhealthcare. Those that listed ‘other’ as an area of work <strong>in</strong>clude bureau nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> currently unemployed.4.1.2 <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> StatusOnly 25 (6.9%) of the respondents reported smok<strong>in</strong>g currently. Fifty eight percent reported to be neversmokers <strong>and</strong> 35% had smoked <strong>in</strong> the past (ex-smokers). The smokers had a mean cigarette consumptionof 5 cigarettes per day. However, two-fifths smoked with<strong>in</strong> 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes of wak<strong>in</strong>g show<strong>in</strong>g that these nursesare highly nicot<strong>in</strong>e dependent (Heatherton et al, 1991). The majority of smokers (88%) stated that they wantedto quit, although 68% expressed the need for help. All but one smoker had tried to quit <strong>in</strong> the past.4.1.3 Knowledge of nicot<strong>in</strong>e dependence, health risksof smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationThe summaries of responses to questions assess<strong>in</strong>g knowledge are shown <strong>in</strong> Appendix C.The majority of respondents (91%) recognised that most people cont<strong>in</strong>ue to smoke because of nicot<strong>in</strong>edependence, <strong>and</strong> that many people experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop smok<strong>in</strong>g (97% agreed).There was high level of awareness of the health risks of smok<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> all of the respondents agreed that lungcancer <strong>and</strong> heart disease were related to smok<strong>in</strong>g. The majority correctly identified the smok<strong>in</strong>g related riskof emphysema (99%) <strong>and</strong> mouth cancer (96%). A lesser number knew that smok<strong>in</strong>g was a cause ofimpotence (64%) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fertility (59%). The majority of respondents recognised the evidence l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>gto ill health <strong>and</strong> that stopp<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g is associated with health benefits.There was wide misunderst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that nicot<strong>in</strong>e caused cancer <strong>and</strong> heart disease. When asked if nicot<strong>in</strong>e wasthe ma<strong>in</strong> product <strong>in</strong> tobacco smoke that causes cancer, only 14% disagreed. Twenty three percent did notknow, <strong>and</strong> over half (63%) agreed that nicot<strong>in</strong>e was the ma<strong>in</strong> cancer caus<strong>in</strong>g agent <strong>in</strong> tobacco. Similar resultsare seen when asked if nicot<strong>in</strong>e causes heart disease (15% disagree, 85% don’t know or agree) <strong>and</strong>emphysema (16% disagree, 84% don’t know or agree).Tobacco companies typically add a number of chemicals to tobacco to alter absorption of nicot<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> taste(Layten Davis & Nielsen, 1999). Just over half of the respondents knew this (57%).18<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


4.1.4 Attitudes <strong>and</strong> beliefs about smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationThe summaries of responses to questions assess<strong>in</strong>g attitudes <strong>and</strong> beliefs about smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation are shown<strong>in</strong> Appendix D.N<strong>in</strong>ety percent of the nurses surveyed agreed that it was part of their responsibility to advise their patients tostop smok<strong>in</strong>g, although 21% stated that they do not have time to do this. The fear of harm<strong>in</strong>g the relationshipwith their patients was not a major barrier for discuss<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation, nor did most nurses believe thatpeople have enough problems without add<strong>in</strong>g to them by try<strong>in</strong>g to give up smok<strong>in</strong>g.Despite the fact that over half of respondents believed that most patients will not give up smok<strong>in</strong>g even ifadvised to do so by a nurse, almost three quarters of the nurses surveyed disagreed that their time wasbetter spent help<strong>in</strong>g patients with other th<strong>in</strong>gs rather than smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation. In fact 87% stated that if theycould effectively <strong>in</strong>tervene they would be happy to spend an extra five m<strong>in</strong>utes with each patient who smokes.Most respondents thought that they had the necessary skills to help smokers to stop. However 77% statedthat they would be <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g more about how to help people stop smok<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> 87% thought thatbe<strong>in</strong>g able to refer people who smoke to a specialist was a good idea.Most respondents (82%) agreed that nurses who smoke set a bad example to their patients Seventy twopercent thought that patients were less likely to take smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice from a nurse who smokes.4.1.5 Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationIn total, 43% of the respondents said they had received some form of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Thirty-four percent of therespondents reported they had received tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g about provid<strong>in</strong>g brief smok<strong>in</strong>g advice, 14% had receivedtra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to use the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Guidel<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>and</strong> 19% had undertaken tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forprovision of nicot<strong>in</strong>e replacement therapy (see Table 2). There were 22 (6%) registered quitcard providers.✜ Table 2: Percentage of nurses who have received smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g* (N=371)%Brief <strong>in</strong>tervention 34Use of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es 14Nicot<strong>in</strong>e replacement therapy 19*Respondents could select more than one<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 19


Respondents reported receiv<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from a wide range of providers <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the National Heart Foundation,Education for Change (Smokechange), District Health Board tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, Pegasus Health <strong>and</strong> ‘basic tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g’ (n=55).There were two written requests for special support for work<strong>in</strong>g with youth <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> schools.4.1.6 Practice <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationEighty four percent of respondents reported that they ask their patients if they smoke, <strong>and</strong> 83% stated thesmok<strong>in</strong>g status is rout<strong>in</strong>ely record <strong>in</strong> the patients’ records. When asked about advice 80% stated that theyadvised their patients about the risks of smok<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> 68% advised people who smoke to quit or cut down(71%). Thirty n<strong>in</strong>e percent of nurses said that they provided smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation counsel<strong>in</strong>g although the natureor type or counsel<strong>in</strong>g is unknown (see Table 3).✜ Table 3: Nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation practiceStrongly Agree Neutral/ Disagree Stronglyagree Don’t disagreeknow% % % % %I ask my patients if they smoke cigarettes (N=363) 27 57 4 11 1<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> status is rout<strong>in</strong>ely recorded on the patients’ 33 50 7 9 1record (N=365)I advise my patients about the health risks of smok<strong>in</strong>g (N=364) 24 56 9 10 1I advise my patients who smoke to quit (N=363) 20 48 13 18 1I advise my patients who smoke to cut down (N=363) 18 53 10 17 2I provide smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation counsell<strong>in</strong>g to patients who 11 28 19 35 8smoke (N=361)Respondents were most likely to refer smokers to the Quitl<strong>in</strong>e (78%) for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation support. This wasfollowed by referrals to practice nurses (46%). Referral to specialist smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation providers (e.g. Maori <strong>and</strong>Pacific providers, <strong>and</strong> programmes such as Smokechange 1 <strong>and</strong> that offered by the Seventh-Day AdventistChurch) was less likely <strong>and</strong> many did not know of the existence of these programmes. (see Appendix E).1Smokechange is a free, motivational <strong>in</strong>tervention provided under contract to the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health <strong>in</strong> Auckl<strong>and</strong>, Christchurch <strong>and</strong> Invercargill. It aimsto improve protection from tobacco for the develop<strong>in</strong>g child – dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> families. For further <strong>in</strong>formation see: Education for Change(http://www.efc.co.nz/).20<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


For nurses who have contact with pregnant women (up to 290 respondents answered these questions) 83%stated that they ask those who smoke if they would like to stop. However only (53%) advise pregnant womenwho smoke to stop altogether, 31% advise cutt<strong>in</strong>g down <strong>in</strong>itially with a view to stopp<strong>in</strong>g later, <strong>and</strong> 6% justadvise cutt<strong>in</strong>g down. Twenty n<strong>in</strong>e percent of nurses reported see<strong>in</strong>g women to confirm pregnancy.4.1.7 Treatments for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationForty five percent of the respondents were aware of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Guidel<strong>in</strong>es,although only 25% had ever read them.<strong>Nurses</strong> were asked to state which of a list of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments they believed were effective <strong>in</strong>aid<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation. These results are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4. The majority identified nicot<strong>in</strong>e patches <strong>and</strong>gum as effective treatments. Acupuncture, hypnosis <strong>and</strong> Nicobrev<strong>in</strong> (treatments without proven effectiveness)were the next most likely to be <strong>in</strong>dicated.✜ Table 4: Percentage of nurses who believe <strong>in</strong> the effectiveness of proven <strong>and</strong>unproven smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessationTreatments with % of respondents Treatments with % of respondentsproven efficacy who believe that unproven efficacy who believe thattreatment is effectivetreatment is effectiveNicot<strong>in</strong>e patch 79% Acupuncture 30%Nicot<strong>in</strong>e gum 56% Hypnosis 40%Nicot<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>haler 14% Nicobrev<strong>in</strong> 33%Nicot<strong>in</strong>e microtab 11% St Johns Wort 4%Nicot<strong>in</strong>e lozenge 12%Bupropion 22%Nortriptyl<strong>in</strong>e 8%1% (n=4) thought none of the above16% did not know<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 21


4.1.8 Workplace smokefree policyAlmost all nurses (98%) knew what the smokefree policy is <strong>in</strong> their workplace, with the majority of workplacesbe<strong>in</strong>g smokefree (88%). Most nurses (96%) said that they support their workplace smokefree policy. Eightpercent of current smokers (n=2) state that they did not support their policy, compared to 4% of both ex- <strong>and</strong>never-smokers. Seventy five percent said they are required to enforce their smokefree policy (for <strong>in</strong>stance askpeople not to smoke or to smoke elsewhere). They reported support from the community, hospital legislation<strong>and</strong> policy, employers <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess partners, management <strong>and</strong> other staff <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g designated smokefreestaff, nurses (senior nurses, occupational health nurses), health promoters, practice GPs, security <strong>and</strong>orderlies. Smokefree signage <strong>and</strong> a policy of employ<strong>in</strong>g non-smokers only were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> support.There were comments about the undesirability of staff <strong>and</strong> patients smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view, outside (n=2).N<strong>in</strong>eteen percent of those who reported hav<strong>in</strong>g to enforce smokefree policy <strong>in</strong>dicated that they did not havesupport to do so. There were written comments about the difficulty of manag<strong>in</strong>g stressed clients <strong>and</strong> peoplewith mental illness (n=1) <strong>and</strong> abuse when ask<strong>in</strong>g patients <strong>and</strong> visitors to smoke <strong>in</strong> designated areas (n=1)✜ 4.2 Census resultsFourteen percent of nurses identified as regular smokers <strong>in</strong> the 2006 Census. Males (19%) smoked morethan females (13%) (see Table 5; Figure1).✜ Table 5: Nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g status by gender, 2006 census*Female Male Totalsmokers smokers smokersn (%) n (%) n (%)Current smoker 4023 13.4 465 19.0 4488 13.8Ex smoker 7965 26.6 768 31.4 8733 26.9Never smoker 17976 60.0 1215 49.6 19191 59.2Total 29964 2448 32412*Excludes “other” (“other” <strong>in</strong>cludes Don't Know, Refused to Answer, Unidentifiable, Outside Scope <strong>and</strong> Not Stated).22<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


✜ Figure 1: Nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g status by gender, 2006 census706050Percent4030MenWomen20100Current Ex smoker Neversmoker smokerIn 1976, 49% <strong>and</strong> 36% of male <strong>and</strong> female nurses smoked respectively (Hay, 1984). The 1996 New Zeal<strong>and</strong>census showed that the nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g prevalence had decreased to 18% overall (27% <strong>in</strong> males <strong>and</strong> 18% <strong>in</strong>females) (Hay, 1998). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence further decl<strong>in</strong>ed to 14% <strong>in</strong> 2006 (see Figure 2).✜ Figure 2: Census trends, prevalence of nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g by gender6050Percent403020MalesFemales10019701980 1990 2000 2010Year1976, 1981, 1996 data: Hay, 1998; 2006 data: Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong><strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 23


Thirty percent of female <strong>and</strong> 26 percent of male mental health nurses smoke regularly (see Appendix F).Twenty two percent of nurses who work <strong>in</strong> aged care smoke. <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> rates are below 15% for all othernurse specialties (see Figure 3).✜ Figure 3: Prevalence of nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g by area of work, 2006 census353025Percent20151050Educator/Researcher/ManagerNurse PractitionerAged CareChild <strong>and</strong> FamilyCommunity HealthCritical Care/EmergencyDisability/RehabilitationMedical/SurgicalMedical PracticeMental HealthPerioperativeNot elsewhere classifiedNurse speciality24<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


5. LimitationsData were self-reported. The whole population non-response rate for the census questions about cigarettesmok<strong>in</strong>g behaviour was 5.2% (Statistics NZ, ndb). It is not possible to determ<strong>in</strong>e the degree of underreport<strong>in</strong>gof smok<strong>in</strong>g status <strong>in</strong> our survey, but it is likely that some smokers did not respond. Comparison ofthe nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g rate reported <strong>in</strong> the census (14%), with the survey (7%) suggests that smokers are underrepresented <strong>in</strong> the survey. Due to the small number of nurses report<strong>in</strong>g to be current smokers mean<strong>in</strong>gfulcomparison of knowledge <strong>and</strong> attitudes between smokers <strong>and</strong> non-smokers could not be undertaken.The census data under-represents the number of nurses <strong>in</strong> the population s<strong>in</strong>ce there were 33,687 nurses<strong>in</strong> the March 2006 census data provided by Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> 44, 442 with current practis<strong>in</strong>gcertificates at 31 March, 2006 (Clark & Ayl<strong>in</strong>g, 2006; Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong> 2007a). However, nurses <strong>in</strong> boththe census <strong>and</strong> our survey were likely to be practis<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce “occupation” refers to paid employment <strong>in</strong> thecensus, <strong>and</strong> we <strong>in</strong>cluded only nurses who had practis<strong>in</strong>g certificates <strong>and</strong> who nom<strong>in</strong>ated cl<strong>in</strong>ical areas ofwork <strong>in</strong> the sample r<strong>and</strong>omly selected by the Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council. Despite an effort to select 50% communitybased <strong>and</strong> 50% hospital based nurses, it was difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e place of work for all respondents fromthe data so comparisons were not undertaken.Mental health nurses were under-represented <strong>in</strong> our survey. Only four percent of respondents said theyworked <strong>in</strong> the mental health area whereas eight percent of nurses with practis<strong>in</strong>g certificates identified thisas their area of practice (Clark & Ayl<strong>in</strong>g, 2006). Maori nurses were also under-represented <strong>in</strong> our survey.Three percent identified as Maori compared with seven percent of those with practis<strong>in</strong>g certificates.<strong>Nurses</strong> were not asked how often they asked clients about smok<strong>in</strong>g status or offered advice about quitt<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 25


6. Discussion<strong>Nurses</strong> use nurs<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>and</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g judgement to provide care. This care <strong>in</strong>cludes assessment, advice<strong>and</strong> support for people to manage their health (The Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2004). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> isresponsible for some 5,000 deaths annually <strong>and</strong> stopp<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g is the best action smokers can take toreduce their risk of cardio-vascular disease <strong>and</strong> cancer (M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2006). Therefore it is essential fornurses to provide evidence-based advice <strong>and</strong> treatment for smokers, <strong>and</strong> to support smokefree environmentsfor non-smokers. Skills to deliver these <strong>in</strong>terventions are as essential as knowledge of cardio-pulmonaryresuscitation; <strong>in</strong>deed they may save more lives.The results of this research reflect the enthusiasm <strong>and</strong>commitment practis<strong>in</strong>g nurses have for <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> tobacco control <strong>in</strong> their work.Our survey shows that nurses have positive attitudes about support<strong>in</strong>g smokers with quitt<strong>in</strong>g. N<strong>in</strong>ety percentfelt that it was part of their responsibility to advise patients to quit smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> over two-thirds did so. Nearlyforty percent counselled their patients who smoke. One-fifth of nurses reported not hav<strong>in</strong>g time to adviseclients about stopp<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g, but almost all said they would be happy to spend an extra five m<strong>in</strong>utes witheach patient who smokes if they could effectively <strong>in</strong>tervene. Fortunately, provision of advice to stop smok<strong>in</strong>gdoes not require much time. It can be delivered <strong>in</strong> as little as 30 seconds (M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2007).<strong>Nurses</strong> <strong>in</strong> the survey were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> further education. Three quarters were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g more tohelp patients quit smok<strong>in</strong>g. Approximately half had not received tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for effective evidence-based smok<strong>in</strong>gcessation <strong>in</strong>terventions, <strong>and</strong> just one-fifth reported receiv<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> undergraduate education. In addition,there were gaps <strong>in</strong> knowledge which could impede the delivery of effective <strong>in</strong>terventions. These gaps <strong>in</strong>cludesound knowledge of best practice for advice to pregnant women, the role of nicot<strong>in</strong>e, knowledge of somespecialist smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation services, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete knowledge of effective smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments.The majority of nurses agreed that they asked pregnant women who smoke if they would like to stop.Pregnant women who smoke should be advised to stop completely as this is associated with the bestoutcome for the pregnancy <strong>and</strong> baby. However, only half gave this advice. A third advised cutt<strong>in</strong>g down witha view to stopp<strong>in</strong>g later, <strong>and</strong> a small proportion (6%) advised cutt<strong>in</strong>g down only. The ‘cut down then quit’method is shown to have some success <strong>in</strong> the general population of smokers but has not been exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>pregnant women (McRobbie et al, 2006). There is clearly some room for improvement <strong>in</strong> the type of adviceprovided to pregnant women who smoke.As seen <strong>in</strong> other surveys nurses had good knowledge of the risks of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g related disease,although more correctly identified illnesses such as cancer <strong>and</strong> heart disease than impotence <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fertility(McElwee et al, 2006; Nagle et al, 1999). Most still believe that nicot<strong>in</strong>e is the component of tobacco smoke26<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


that is primarily responsible for smok<strong>in</strong>g related illness. This belief could be a barrier for the use of effectivesmok<strong>in</strong>g cessation medications like nicot<strong>in</strong>e replacement therapy. In fact nicot<strong>in</strong>e is responsible for addiction<strong>and</strong> it is products of combustion that have greatest risk for disease (Royal College of Physicians of London,2000; World Health Organisation, 1986)). <strong>Nurses</strong>, as well as other healthcare professionals <strong>and</strong> smokers,would benefit from <strong>in</strong>formation about the role of nicot<strong>in</strong>e.<strong>Nurses</strong> were keen to refer to smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation specialists when needed. Of the nurses surveyed theywere most likely to refer people who smoke to the Quitl<strong>in</strong>e. This is similar to an Australian survey where thetelephone based smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation services are most widely promoted (Nagle et al, 1999). They were lesslikely to refer to some of the specialist smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation programmes, <strong>and</strong> many were not aware of theexistence of these. Knowledge of these programmes could enhance service to clients. For <strong>in</strong>stance, AukatiKai Paipa offers a kaupapa Maori service reflect<strong>in</strong>g Maori culture <strong>and</strong> identity.In addition, knowledge of effective smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments could be improved. Like most smokers,nurses were more likely to know of nicot<strong>in</strong>e patches <strong>and</strong> gum for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation than medications suchas nicot<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>haler or nortriptyl<strong>in</strong>e. Treatments such as hypnosis <strong>and</strong> acupuncture were identified as effectivetreatments by more than a quarter of nurses. These treatments are often well advertised, but there is noevidence for these treatments <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g people to stop long-term (Abbot et al, 2006; White et al, 2006).Nicobrev<strong>in</strong> was also selected by a third of nurses as be<strong>in</strong>g effective. There is currently <strong>in</strong>sufficient evidenceavailable to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effectiveness of this treatment <strong>and</strong> so it should not be recommended to smokers(Stead & Lancaster, 2006). This data confirms that further smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g should be readilyaccessible for nurses.Ideally all nurses should receive basic tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to address the gaps <strong>in</strong> knowledge described above. Basictra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g would equip them with some knowledge on tobacco dependence <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation, how toprovide brief advice, <strong>and</strong> what smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation services are available to people who want help <strong>in</strong> quitt<strong>in</strong>g.It is important that it is consistent with the evidence-based national guidel<strong>in</strong>es for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation<strong>in</strong>terventions (M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2007). Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g needs to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>formation about work with prioritypopulations – Maori, Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong> peoples, pregnant women <strong>and</strong> people who use mental health <strong>and</strong>addiction services. Brief <strong>in</strong>tervention tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is delivered <strong>in</strong> some undergraduate nurs<strong>in</strong>g courses <strong>in</strong> NewZeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> this should be exp<strong>and</strong>ed (<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Framework Advisory Group, 2007).In new-graduate <strong>and</strong> post-graduate sett<strong>in</strong>gs tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g can to be tailored to the special populations nurseswork with. Advanced tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g should also be made available for nurses so they can provide treatment.Support <strong>and</strong> education for nurse assistants <strong>and</strong> enrolled nurses is important.<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 27


<strong>Nurses</strong> need support with smokefree environments <strong>and</strong> to deliver smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation treatments. GPsreported that they refer clients who smoke to practice nurses (Glover et al, 2007). Most nurses are required topromote smokefree environments <strong>in</strong> their workplaces, but a fifth do not report support for ask<strong>in</strong>g people notto smoke or to smoke elsewherethis. Manag<strong>in</strong>g nicot<strong>in</strong>e dependence <strong>in</strong> clients may be part of nurse work <strong>and</strong>require upskill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> team work. However, Health <strong>and</strong> Safety representatives may more appropriately enforcesmokefree environments <strong>in</strong> health sett<strong>in</strong>gs. Barriers for nurses <strong>in</strong>clude difficulty with gett<strong>in</strong>g time for smok<strong>in</strong>gcessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> service delivery <strong>and</strong> failure to recognize nurses as effective autonomous practitioners(Pullon et al, 2005).Funders <strong>and</strong> employers can support the professional development of their nurs<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>and</strong> acknowledge theenthusiasm of the practis<strong>in</strong>g nurses by fund<strong>in</strong>g nurses directly for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation work; build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> time forsmok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; support<strong>in</strong>g nurses with promot<strong>in</strong>g smokefree environments; <strong>and</strong>support<strong>in</strong>g nurse led research <strong>and</strong> evaluation of <strong>in</strong>terventions.Our research shows that nurses cont<strong>in</strong>ue to protect their own health <strong>and</strong> model smokefree lifestyles to theNew Zeal<strong>and</strong> population. Over the past thirty years the prevalence of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nurses <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> hasdecreased <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the reduction <strong>in</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g rates <strong>in</strong> the general population. <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence <strong>in</strong> nursesdecl<strong>in</strong>ed from 1996 (18%) to 2006 (14%), <strong>and</strong> nurses cont<strong>in</strong>ue to smoke at a lower rate than the generalpopulation as measured <strong>in</strong> the census (21%) (Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2007b). However, there are importantdifferences <strong>in</strong> nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g rates by gender <strong>and</strong> nurse specialty. The lower overall smok<strong>in</strong>g rate ispredom<strong>in</strong>antly driven by female nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g rates. N<strong>in</strong>ety-three percent of the nurs<strong>in</strong>g workforce isfemale. Their smok<strong>in</strong>g rate (13%) is lower than the female smok<strong>in</strong>g rate for the whole population (20%).The prevalence of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> male nurses is 19%, closer to the male smok<strong>in</strong>g rate for the whole population(22%) (Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2007b).<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> rates for all specialty areas of work, apart from aged care <strong>and</strong> mental health nurs<strong>in</strong>g are below 15%.<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence for mental health nurses has decl<strong>in</strong>ed from 31% <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 29% <strong>in</strong> 2006 but rema<strong>in</strong>shigher than for other nurses <strong>and</strong> the general population (Hay, 1998). This is of concern because the smok<strong>in</strong>gstatus of nurses has been shown to affect their attitudes towards smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation, <strong>and</strong> alsohas an impact on provision of smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation advice (Becker et al, 1986; Padula, 1992). Reduc<strong>in</strong>gsmok<strong>in</strong>g among mental health service users is a priority <strong>and</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the number of mental health workerswho smoke will play a key role <strong>in</strong> the success of this strategy. The complexity of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation withmedications <strong>and</strong> psychiatric illness <strong>in</strong> clients, as well as a perception of a culture of client <strong>and</strong> staff smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>mental health sett<strong>in</strong>gs mean that staff need specialised tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> strong organizational support to reduce28<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


smok<strong>in</strong>g (Lawn & Pols, 2005). Resources <strong>and</strong> services to support smokefree mental health sett<strong>in</strong>gs need tomatch the high levels of need <strong>in</strong> these areas. It is imperative that all nurses who smoke receive the level ofpersonal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional support they need to quit.This research supports <strong>and</strong> provides direction for the development of a nurse advocacy group for nurses.A smokefree advocacy group would provide peer leadership <strong>and</strong> support for the large number of nursescurrently engaged <strong>in</strong> tobacco control work. It could support nurses who wish to quit, promote release time fornurses to further develop their smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>tervention skills (thus address<strong>in</strong>g gaps <strong>in</strong> knowledge), <strong>and</strong>promote teach<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation skills <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of tobacco control <strong>in</strong> Schools of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g. Anadvocacy group could enhance the nurs<strong>in</strong>g profession by promot<strong>in</strong>g direct fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nurse leadership ofmembers of the profession deliver<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions. Initiatives address<strong>in</strong>g the supply sideof tobacco control could be supported by an organization speak<strong>in</strong>g on behalf of members of a large <strong>and</strong> wellrespected health profession (Malone, 2006). Examples <strong>in</strong>clude support for bann<strong>in</strong>g retail displays of tobaccoproducts <strong>in</strong> dairies, supermarkets <strong>and</strong> service stations <strong>and</strong> anti-tobacco <strong>in</strong>dustry activity.<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 29


7. Conclusion<strong>Nurses</strong> want to help smokers to stop smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> there is evidence to show that they are well-placed todo this. Fill<strong>in</strong>g gaps <strong>in</strong> their knowledge as well as support<strong>in</strong>g tobacco control as part of their nurs<strong>in</strong>g workwill further strengthen their role <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the burden of disease associated with smok<strong>in</strong>g tobacco.30<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


ReferencesAbbot, N.C., Stead, L.F., White, A.R. & Barnes, J. (2006). Hypnotherapy for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2).Andrews, J.O. & Heath, J. (2003). Women <strong>and</strong> the global tobacco epidemic: nurses call to action.International Council of <strong>Nurses</strong>. International Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Review. 50: 215-28.Becker, D.M., Myers, A.H., Sacci, M., Weida, S., Swank, R., Lev<strong>in</strong>e, D.M. & Pearson, T.A.(1986). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong>behavior <strong>and</strong> attitudes toward smok<strong>in</strong>g among hospital nurses. American Journal of Public Health.76(12):1449-51.Blakely, T., Fawcett, J., Hunt, D. & Wilson, N. (2006). What is the contribution of smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> socioeconomicstatus to ethnic <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> mortality <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>? Lancet. 368: 44-52.Campbell, T. (2005). Let’s Clear the Air. New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Review. Feb: 13.Clark, M. & Ayl<strong>in</strong>g, B. (2006). Workforce Statistics, 2006 Update. The Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Forum2006. Available at http://www.nurs<strong>in</strong>gcouncil.org.nz/forum.htmlDoll, R., Peto, R., Boreham, J., & Sutherl<strong>and</strong> I. (2004). Mortality <strong>in</strong> relation to smok<strong>in</strong>g: 50 years ofobservations on male British doctors. British Medical Journal. 328:1519.Durk<strong>in</strong>, A. (2007). Promot<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation among nurs<strong>in</strong>g students: How faculty can help.Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Education Perspectives. 28 (3): 150 -154.Emmanuel, L. (2007). Mental Health Smokefree Project – respond<strong>in</strong>g to unmet needs. Mason Cl<strong>in</strong>ic ProjectTeam, Auckl<strong>and</strong> District Health Board. Presentation at Smokefree North Regional Hui, 11.4.07 – 12.4.07.Glover, M., Paynter, J., Bullen, C. & Kristensen, K. (2007). Support<strong>in</strong>g pregnant women to quit smok<strong>in</strong>g:Postal survey of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> general practitioners <strong>and</strong> midwives’ knowledge <strong>and</strong> practices. Submitted.Hay, D.R. (1984). Intercensal trends <strong>in</strong> cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g by New Zeal<strong>and</strong> doctors <strong>and</strong> nurses.New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Journal. 77(10):7-9.Hay, D.R. (1998). Cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g by New Zeal<strong>and</strong> doctors <strong>and</strong> nurses: results from the 1996 populationcensus. New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Medical Journal. 111(1062):102-4.Heatherton, T., Kozlowski, L., Frecker, R. & Fagerström, K-O. (1991). The Fagerström test for nicot<strong>in</strong>edependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction. 86:1119-1127.Jaireth, N. (2003). Childhood smok<strong>in</strong>g: the research, cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>and</strong> theoretical imperative for nurs<strong>in</strong>g action.International Council of <strong>Nurses</strong>. International Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Review. 50: 203-14.<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 31


Pullon, S., Webster, M., McLeod, D.B. & Morgan, S. (2004). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cessation <strong>and</strong> nicot<strong>in</strong>e replacementtherapy <strong>in</strong> current primary maternity care. Australian Family Physician. 33(1/2):94-96.Pullon, S., Cornford, E., McLeod, D., de Silva, K. & Simpson, C. (2005). Workplace factors: The key tosuccessful <strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed cont<strong>in</strong>uation of a general practice-based smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation programme. AustralianJournal of Primary Health. 11 (1):55-62.Raw, M., McNeill, A. & West, R. (1998). <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cessation guidel<strong>in</strong>es for health professionals. A guide toeffective smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>in</strong>terventions for the health care system. Thorax 53:suppl 5(1):S1-19.Rice, V.H. & Stead, L.F. (2004). Nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation. Cochrane Database ofSystematic Reviews (2).Royal College of Physicians of London (2000). Nicot<strong>in</strong>e Addiction <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>. A report of the Tobacco AdvisoryGroup of the Royal College of Physicians. Available at: http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/nicot<strong>in</strong>e/Slater, P., McElwee, G., Flem<strong>in</strong>g, P. & McKenna, H. (2006). <strong>Nurses</strong>' smok<strong>in</strong>g behaviour related to cessationpractice. Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Times. 102(19):32-7.Smoke-free Environments Amendments Act. (2003). The Statutes of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2003. No. 127.<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Framework Advisory Group (2007). Scop<strong>in</strong>g paper on the Current <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong>Cessation Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (nda). Census 2006 <strong>in</strong>formation about data > <strong>in</strong>formation by variable > occupation.Available at: http://www.stats.govt.nz/census/2006-census-<strong>in</strong>formation-about-data/<strong>in</strong>formation-byvariable/occupation.htmStatistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. (ndb). Census 2006 <strong>in</strong>formation about data > <strong>in</strong>formation by variable > smok<strong>in</strong>gbehaviour. Available at: http://www.stats.govt.nz/census/2006-census-<strong>in</strong>formation-about-data/<strong>in</strong>formation-byvariable/cigarette-smok<strong>in</strong>g-behaviour.htmStatistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. (2007a). New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Census of Population <strong>and</strong> Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs, 2006. Data supplied toHayden McRobbie, Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Trials Research Unit, The University of Auckl<strong>and</strong>. Reference Number: ROM13858.Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. (2007b). New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Census of Population <strong>and</strong> Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs, 2006. Data supplied to<strong>ASH</strong>, NZ. Reference Number: TRM17108.Stead, L.F. & Lancaster T. (2006). Nicobrev<strong>in</strong> for smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2).The Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (2004). Scopes of Practice. Available athttp://www.nurs<strong>in</strong>gcouncil.org.nz/scopes.html<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 33


The Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Council of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (2005). Competencies for the registered nurse scopes of practice.Available at http://www.nurs<strong>in</strong>gcouncil.org.nz/contcomp.html#CompsTown, G.A., Fraser, P., Graham, S. McSweeney, W., Brockway, K. & Kirk, R. (2000). Establishment of a smok<strong>in</strong>gcessation programme <strong>in</strong> primary <strong>and</strong> secondary care <strong>in</strong> Canterbury. New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Medical Journal. 113: 117-9.White, A.R., Rampes, H. & Campbell, J.L. (2006). Acupuncture <strong>and</strong> related <strong>in</strong>terventions for smok<strong>in</strong>gcessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2).Woodward, A. & Laugesen, M. (2001). How many deaths are caused by second h<strong>and</strong> cigarette smoke?Tobacco Control. 10: 383-8.World Health Organisation (1986). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carc<strong>in</strong>ogenic Risk of Chemicalsto Humans Tobacco <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> 38 International Agency for Research on Cancer: Switzerl<strong>and</strong>.World Health Organisation (2003). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Available athttp://www.who.<strong>in</strong>t/tobacco/framework/en/34<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


Appendix ANurse advocacy groups<strong>Nurses</strong> for a Smokefree Aotearoa/New Zeal<strong>and</strong><strong>ASH</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Phone 09 520 4866Action on tobacco control. Lobby kit for RNs Registered <strong>Nurses</strong> Association of Ontariohttp://www.rnao.org/Page.asp?PageID=1224&SiteNodeID=337International Network of Women Aga<strong>in</strong>st Tobaccohttp://www.<strong>in</strong>wat.org/Night<strong>in</strong>galeshttp://www.night<strong>in</strong>galesnurses.org/voices.htmlNorthern <strong>Nurses</strong> Aga<strong>in</strong>st Tobaccohttp://www.vardforbundet.se/templates/VFArticlePage4.aspx?id=434<strong>Nurses</strong>’ Network Aga<strong>in</strong>st Tobacco <strong>and</strong> Substance Abuse of Thail<strong>and</strong>http://www.tobaccofree.ns.mahidol.ac.thClear<strong>in</strong>g the air 2. <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> tobacco control – an updated guide for nurses.Royal College of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Tobacco Education Projecthttp://www.rcn.org.uk/members/downloads/clear<strong>in</strong>g-the-air_2.pdfTobacco Free <strong>Nurses</strong>http://www.tobaccofreenurses.org/about.php<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cessation guidel<strong>in</strong>esNew Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Cessation Guidel<strong>in</strong>es. Available from http://www.moh.govt.nz<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cessation tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for nursesNew Zeal<strong>and</strong> Heart FoundationEducation for ChangeTe Hotu Manawa MaoriPacific Isl<strong>and</strong>s HeartbeatCancer Society of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (Well<strong>in</strong>gton Div)http://www.nhf.org.nzhttp://www.efc.co.nzhttp://www.tehotumanawa.org.nzhttp://www.pacificheart.org.nzhttp://www.cancernz.org.nzNational smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation service providersQuitl<strong>in</strong>e Phone: 0800 778 778 www.quit.org.nzAukati Kai Paipa Phone: 09 638 5800 www.tehotumanawa.org.nz<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 35


Appendix B36<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 37


38<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 39


40<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 41


Appendix C✜ <strong>Nurses</strong>’ knowledge of smok<strong>in</strong>g related issuesStrongly Agree Neutral/ Disagree Stronglyagree Don’t disagreeknow% % % % ∞%Most people smoke because they are addicted to nicot<strong>in</strong>e 44 47 5 4 -(N=362)Withdrawal symptoms are commonly experienced by smokers 53 44 2 1 0when they stop (N=363)<strong>Smok<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is a known risk factor for:Lung cancer (N=367) 93 7 0 0 0Heart disease (N=368) 89 11 0 0 0Emphysema (N=364) 91 8 1 0 0Mouth cancer (N=367) 77 19 3 1 0Impotence (N=363) 39 25 33 4 -Infertility (N=363) 35 24 34 7 -Diabetes (N=361) 41 21 24 13 2Tobacco companies typically add chemicals (e.g. ammonia) 33 24 43 0 -to the tobacco to improve the delivery of nicot<strong>in</strong>e to thesmoker (N=364)Nicot<strong>in</strong>e is the ma<strong>in</strong> product <strong>in</strong> tobacco smoke that causes:Cancer (N=366) 35 28 23 11 3Heart Disease (N=367) 34 30 21 13 2Emphysema (N=366) 37 26 22 13 3The evidence l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g to ill health is not that strong 2 4 2 22 70(N=367)Stopp<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g can have <strong>in</strong>stant health benefits (N=368) 39 43 5 9 442<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


Appendix D✜ Attitudes <strong>and</strong> beliefs about smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>and</strong> nurse practiceBeliefs <strong>and</strong> attitudes about practiceStrongly Agree Neutral/ Disagree Stronglyagree Don’t disagreeknow% % % % ∞%It is part of my responsibility to advise my patients to quit 40 50 4 6 1smok<strong>in</strong>g (N=366)I don’t have time to advise my patients about how to quit 3 18 5 53 22smok<strong>in</strong>g (N=366)Discuss<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation harms my relationship with 1 8 10 57 24patients who smoke (N=365)People have enough problems without add<strong>in</strong>g to them by 1 7 7 56 29giv<strong>in</strong>g up smok<strong>in</strong>g (N=366)Most patients will not give up smok<strong>in</strong>g even if advised to do so 7 48 19 23 2by a nurse (N=367)A nurse’s time is better spent help<strong>in</strong>g patients with other th<strong>in</strong>gs 9 8 15 49 25rather than smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation (N=367)If I could effectively <strong>in</strong>tervene, I would be happy to spend an 39 48 9 3 1extra 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes with each patient who smokes (N=365)<strong>Nurses</strong> do not have the necessary skills to helps smokers 3 20 12 46 19to stop (N=364)I would be <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g more about how to help my 27 50 15 8 -patients quit smok<strong>in</strong>g (N=364)Be<strong>in</strong>g able to refer smokers for specialist treatment is a 39 48 9 3 1good idea (N=366)Discuss<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation is the role of primary care (N=366) 29 49 4 16 3Beliefs <strong>and</strong> attitudes about nurses’ smok<strong>in</strong>gIt is the nurse’s responsibility to set a good example by not 43 39 10 8 1smok<strong>in</strong>g (N=367)See<strong>in</strong>g a nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g is not likely to affect a smokers 3 18 9 48 22op<strong>in</strong>ion of smok<strong>in</strong>g (N=365)Whether or not a nurse smokes is entirely her/his own 8 37 13 33 8bus<strong>in</strong>ess (N=366)<strong>Nurses</strong> that smoke provide a bad example to their patients (N=366) 31 51 10 7 1Patients are less likely to take advice from a nurse who is a 29 43 18 9 1current smoker (N=365)<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 43


Appendix E✜ Likelihood of nurse referrals to smok<strong>in</strong>g cessation servicesVery Likely Unlikely Very Don’tlikely unlikely knowof it% % % % ∞%Quitl<strong>in</strong>e (N=357) 34 44 13 6 3A Maori cessation provider eg. Aukati Kai Paipa (N=347) 17 27 21 9 27Smokechange (N=335) 5 12 24 7 52A Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong> Cessation Provider (N=340) 6 17 24 11 427th Day Adventist Church Programme (N=336) 2 7 28 11 52A Practice Nurse (N=336) 14 32 32 12 1044<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong>


Appendix F✜ Prevalence of nurse smok<strong>in</strong>g by gender <strong>and</strong> area of work, 2006 CensusFemale Male Total Totalsmokers smokers smokersn % n % n % Female Male TotalManager, 516 (13.4) 69 (18.9) 585 (13.8) 3858 366 4224educator,researcherNurse practitioner 9 (8.6) 0 - 9 (7.7) 105 12 117Aged care 48 (21.1) 0 - 51 (21.8) 228 3 234Child <strong>and</strong> 63 (9.9) 3 (25.0) 66 (10.1) 639 12 651family healthCommunity health 159 (11.3) 6 (10.5) 165 (11.3) 1407 57 1464Critical care <strong>and</strong> 24 (13.8) 0 - 27 (13.8) 174 18 195emergencyDevelopmental 21 (14.0) 0 - 21 (13.5) 150 6 156disability, disability<strong>and</strong> rehabilitationMedical <strong>and</strong> surgical 2538 (13.1) 231 (18.2) 2769 (13.5) 19311 1269 20580Medical practice 168 (8.8) 3 (33.3) 168 (8.8) 1899 9 1905Mental health 342 (30.1) 135 (25.6) 480 (28.8) 1137 528 1668Perioperative 33 (14.1) 6 (22.2) 39 (14.9) 234 27 261Not elsewhere 105 (13.1) 9 (11.1) 114 (12.9) 804 81 885classifiedRound<strong>in</strong>g to three to protect privacy means totals may not agree with totals of <strong>in</strong>dividual items.<strong>ASH</strong>-KAN AOTEAROA: ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HISTORY, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES IN <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ZEALAND</strong> 45


ISBN No: 978-0-473-12559-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!