10.07.2015 Views

Alameda County Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice and ...

Alameda County Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice and ...

Alameda County Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

defendant). For the <strong>for</strong>egoing reasons, <strong>County</strong> <strong>Defendants'</strong> joinder in this action is improper<strong>and</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Defendants'</strong> demurrer should be sustained under C.C.P. § 430.10(d).4. Assuming Plaintiffs seek to establish taxpayer st<strong>and</strong>ing under C.C.P. 5526(a), they fail to allege facts sufficient to meet the taxpayer st<strong>and</strong>ingrequirements under C.C.P. 5 430.10(e).If, in fact, the bare allegations of the Complaint are read to assert st<strong>and</strong>ing as a taxpayerunder C.C.P. § 526(a), Plaintiffs have failed to state facts sufficient to meet the taxpayerst<strong>and</strong>ing requirements.The Complaint states only that, "Plaintiff Cliff Gardner lives in <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>County</strong>,Cali<strong>for</strong>nia," <strong>and</strong> "pays taxes to the State of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia <strong>and</strong> the <strong>County</strong> of <strong>Alameda</strong>." (Complaint,p. 1:17-19) The Complaint makes no factual allegations regarding the payment of taxes byPlaintiff Drug Policy Alliance or Plaintiff Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Society of Addiction Medicine. As to PlaintiffDrug Policy Alliance, the Complaint merely stets that Drug Policy Alliance "has an office in the<strong>County</strong> of <strong>Alameda</strong>;" <strong>and</strong> as to Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Society of Addiction, the Complaint makes noreference to any connection between it <strong>and</strong> the <strong>County</strong> of <strong>Alameda</strong>. (Complaint, p. 1:22-27, p.IISection 526(a) allows certain lawsuits against cities <strong>and</strong> counties "either by a citizenresident therein, or by a corporation, who is assessed <strong>for</strong> <strong>and</strong> is liable to pay, or, within one yearbe<strong>for</strong>e the commencement of the action, has paid, a tax there." (C.C.P. § 526(a)) In Torres v.Yorba Linda (1993) 13 Ca1.App.4'~ 1035, 1048, the court held that payment of sales tax alonedoes not suffice to meet the taxpayer st<strong>and</strong>ing requirements of section 526(a). Here, Plaintiff11 Cliff Garner merely alleges he 'pays taxes to the State of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia <strong>and</strong> the <strong>County</strong> of<strong>Alameda</strong>." The Complaint does not allege that Cliff Garner has paid or been "assessed <strong>for</strong>"property taxes or other local taxes, as required by section 526(a). And it is entirely unclear fromthe Complaint which kind of taxes -sales, property, or other local taxes -Cliff Gardnerallegedly has paid. As to the other Plaintiffs, the Complaint makes no allegations with regard totheir payment of taxes to the <strong>County</strong> of <strong>Alameda</strong> whatsoever. There<strong>for</strong>e, assuming Plaintiffsseek to establish taxpayer st<strong>and</strong>ing under section 526(a), they have failed to allege necessary11 facts to establish st<strong>and</strong>ing in that regard(1 <strong>County</strong> <strong>Defendants'</strong> Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Complaint / Case No. RG06-278911 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!