Alameda County Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF AUTHORITIESSTATE CASES'978 Corporation v . Pitchess (1 974) 41 Cal.App.3d 42 ............................................................ 5llfaro v . Terhune (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 492 ................ ......................................................... 7ltlantic Richfield Co . v . Superior Court (1 975) 51 Cal.App.3d 168 ............................................ 10:ity of Santa Monica v . Superior Court (1964) 231 Cal.App.2d 223 ............................................ 6.,ohen v . Board of Supervisors (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 447 .................................................... 5. 7>aar v . Yellow Cab Co . (1967) 67 Cal.2d 695 ............................................................................ 5IeHaviland v . Warner Brothers Pictures (1 944) 67 Cai.App.2d 225 ........................................ 6IeMoff v . Board of Police Commissioners (1 981) 122 Cal.App.3d 296 ....................................... 6- .-rske v . Gillespie (1 988) 200 Cal.App.3d 1243 ........................................................................... 8Solden Gate Sightseeing Tours v . City and County of San Francisco(1937) 21 Cal.App.2d 582 ............................................................................................... 5{art v . County ofAlameda (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 766 ................................................................ 5ioag v . Superior Court (1962) 207 Cal.App.2d 61 1 .................................................................. 10.each v . City of San Marcos (1 989) 213 Cal.App.3d 648 ............................................................ 4. evy v . City of Santa Monica (2004) 114 Cal.App.4th 1252 ........................................................ 4Manchel v . County of Los Angeles (1966) 245 Cal.App.2d 501 .................................................. 6Varin v . Jacuzzi (1 964) 224 Cal.App.2d 549 ............................................................................... 5bcific Legal Foundation v . Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 ........................................................ 8. 9#chess v . Superior Court (1 969) 2 Cal.App.3d 644 ................................................................... 7robe v . City of Santa Ana (1 995) 9 Cal.4th 1069 .................................................................... 7, 8rorres v . Yorba Linda (1993) 13 caL~pp.4'~ I 035 .................................................................... I1STATESTATUTES:ivil CodeSection 3423(d) ................................................................................................................ 6, 7Section 3423(f) ........................... ..................................................................................... 1:ode of Civil ProcedureSection 379(a) ..................................................................................................................... 10Section 389(a) ..................................................................................................................... 10Section 389(a)(l)(ii) ............................................................................................................. I0:ounty Defendants' Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Complaint I Case No . RG06-276911ii
Section 430.1 O(d) .......................................................................................................... 10, 11Section 430.10(e) ................................................................................................... I , 4, 6, I Section 526(a) ........................................................................................................ I, 4, 8, I Section 526(b) ................................................................................................................... 6, 7Section 526(b)(4) ................................................................................................................... IGovernment CodeSection 26500 ....................................................................................................................... 2Section 26605 ........................ ................................................................................................2County Defendants' Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Complaint I Case No. RGO6-278911iii
Page 1: I1I II IRICHARD E. WlNNlE [68048]Co
Page 4 and 5: I RICHARD E. WlNNlE [68048]Countv C
Page 8 and 9: I. INTRODUCTIONThis demurrer is bro
Page 10 and 11: 219-21). The Plaintiffs continue by
Page 12 and 13: Indeed, Plaintiffs' Complaint and M
Page 14 and 15: unconstitutional, as of this point
Page 16 and 17: in favor of the Legislature's actio
Page 18 and 19: defendant). For the foregoing reaso
Page 20: I II IDECLARATION OF SERVICEGardner

Alameda County Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?