19.11.2012 Views

Rheopheresis for Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD ...

Rheopheresis for Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD ...

Rheopheresis for Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26th Annual Meeting<br />

April 27 - 30, 2005<br />

Chicago, IL<br />

<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dry</strong><br />

<strong>Age</strong>-<strong>Related</strong><br />

<strong>Age</strong> <strong>Age</strong>-<strong>Related</strong> <strong>Related</strong> <strong>Macular</strong><br />

<strong>Degeneration</strong> (<strong>AMD</strong>)- (<strong>AMD</strong>) (<strong>AMD</strong>)-<br />

Reference Controlled<br />

RheoNet-Registry<br />

RheoNet RheoNet-Registry Registry<br />

Analysis of Safety and<br />

Efficacy<br />

R. Klingel1 , D. Wong2 , C. Fassbender1 , I. Siegel3 , B. Erdtracht4 R. Klingel ,<br />

<strong>for</strong> the International <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Excellence Centers<br />

1 , D. Wong 2 , C. Fassbender 1 , I. Siegel 3 , B. Erdtracht 4 ,<br />

<strong>for</strong> the International <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Excellence Centers<br />

1 Apheresis Research Institute, Cologne, Germany<br />

2 Dept. Ophthalmol. Ophthalmol<br />

Ophthalmol. . Vis. Sci., Sci Sci., ., Univ. of Toronto, Canada<br />

3 RheoClinic Toronto, Canada<br />

4 <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Teaching Center, Cologne, Germany


Definition of <strong>Rheopheresis</strong><br />

<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> from a general methodological point of view is an<br />

application of membrane differential filtration (MDF), synonymous with<br />

double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP).<br />

However, <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> was specifically designed to treat<br />

microcirculatory disorders like the microcirculatory impairment of the<br />

macula associated with dry age-related macular degeneration using an<br />

polyethylene membrane plasmaseparator and the Rheofilter in<br />

combination with an appropriate controlled pump technology.<br />

The single <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment simultaneously eliminates an<br />

exactly defined spectrum of high-molecular weight rheologically<br />

relevant plasma proteins (i.e. α2-macroglobulin, fibrinogen, LDLcholesterol,<br />

Lp(a), von Willebrand factor [vWF], IgM, fibronectin, and<br />

putatively multimeric vitronectin). This results in the immediate pulsed<br />

reduction of plasma viscosity as well whole blood viscosity, which can<br />

lead to sustained microcirculatory recovery.


heopheresis<br />

Blood<br />

Plasmaseparation<br />

Plasma after <strong>Rheopheresis</strong><br />

native Plasma<br />

Plasmafiltration<br />

Immediate effect:<br />

pulsed reduction of<br />

plasma viscosity<br />

(blood flow, shear stress,<br />

transmural plasma flux)<br />

Filtration of rheologically active<br />

high-molecular-weight plasmaproteins<br />

-59%<br />

-51%<br />

-50%<br />

-43%<br />

-59%<br />

-55%<br />

LDL-cholesterol 2.500.000 D<br />

21 nm<br />

IgM app. 1.000.000 D<br />

α2-Macroglobulin 725.000 D<br />

Fibronectin 450.000 D<br />

Fibrinogen 340.000 D<br />

von Willebrand factor 250.000 D<br />

(monomer)<br />

-15% - -18%


<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> in in Clinical Clinical Practice<br />

Practice<br />

out-patient treatment<br />

app. 3 hrs


<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>AMD</strong><br />

Mechanism of Action - Hypothesis<br />

Repetitive pulses of simultaneous plasma protein elimination with<br />

a decrease of blood and plasma viscosity by <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> result<br />

in a sustained change in the natural course of <strong>AMD</strong> development<br />

and progression. <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment seems to restore and<br />

activate or stabilize the functional reserve of the retina at<br />

microcirculatory levels.<br />

Results from clinical trials with patients suffering from <strong>AMD</strong> and<br />

microcirculatory disorders of other tissue beds (e.g. critical limb<br />

ischemia, ischemic diabetic foot, diabetic retinopathy, and sudden<br />

sensorineural hearing loss, as well as basic research in the field of<br />

<strong>AMD</strong> pathogenesis, describing structural and functional features of<br />

impaired microcirculation in <strong>AMD</strong> can be referenced as proof of<br />

principle.


<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>AMD</strong><br />

Mechanism of Action<br />

Further Reading<br />

Jose Pulido, Pulido Pulido, , Donald Sanders, Jeffrey Winters, Reinhard Klingel<br />

Clinical Outcomes and Mechanism of Action <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Treatment of <strong>Age</strong>-<strong>Related</strong> <strong>Age</strong> <strong>Age</strong>-<strong>Related</strong> <strong>Related</strong> <strong>Macular</strong><br />

<strong>Degeneration</strong><br />

J Clin Apheresis 2005; in press


<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> Microcirculatory Disorders<br />

Level of Evidence <strong>for</strong> Efficacy<br />

<strong>Age</strong>-<strong>Related</strong> <strong>Macular</strong> <strong>Degeneration</strong><br />

MAC I: randomized controlled clinical trial at the University of Cologne, Germany<br />

[Brunner et al., Retina 2000]<br />

Utah-Trial: randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial at the University of Salt Lake City, USA<br />

[Swartz et al., Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999]<br />

MIRA-1: randomized sham-controlled double blinded multicenter trial in the USA<br />

[Pulido et al., Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2002 (interim analysis)]<br />

Sudden Deafness (Acute Sensorineural Hearing Loss)<br />

Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial in Germany (interim analysis [unpublished])<br />

Ischemic Diabetic Foot Syndrome<br />

1 pilot trial [Klingel et al., Ther Apheresis Dial 2003; 7: 444-455]<br />

Critical Limb Ischemia with PAOD<br />

1 pilot trial [Ther Apheresis Dial 2005; in press]


First experience:<br />

Brunner 1995<br />

<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>AMD</strong><br />

<strong>AMD</strong><br />

Current schedules <strong>for</strong> the initial treatment series:<br />

MAC I<br />

MAC II/III<br />

Utah<br />

MIRA-1<br />

week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21<br />

Target <strong>for</strong> the single <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment:<br />

100% of the individual plasma volume (minimum 70%)


<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>AMD</strong><br />

www.rheo.com<br />

MIRA-1 Trial<br />

+ LEARN 1 & 2 Trials<br />

MIRA-1:<br />

Dec 2004 185 patients enrolled<br />

Feb 2005 treatments completed<br />

Dec 2005 12 mo follow-up compl.<br />

LEARN 1 & 2:<br />

March 2005 initiation<br />

LEARN 1 booster treatments<br />

LEARN 2 cross-over of sham-pts.<br />

www.amdstudy.com<br />

w.apheresis-research.org<br />

www.rheopherese-zentrum.de<br />

Hamburg<br />

Hannover<br />

Detmold<br />

Münster<br />

Marl<br />

Oberhausen<br />

Essen Lüdenscheid<br />

Wuppertal<br />

DürenKöln<br />

Langenfeld<br />

Bonn Remscheid<br />

Aachen<br />

Bad Hersfeld<br />

Limburg<br />

Koblenz Frankfurt Bad Neustadt<br />

Wiesbaden<br />

Coburg<br />

Ingelheim<br />

Mainz<br />

Mannheim<br />

Homburg/Saar<br />

Neunkirchen<br />

Karlsbad<br />

Tübingen<br />

Friedrichshafen<br />

Gifhorn<br />

Rostock<br />

Greifswald<br />

München<br />

Germering<br />

Neuruppin<br />

Berlin<br />

Potsdam<br />

Plauen<br />

Dresden


Lines of EDTRS BSCVA Change from Baseline<br />

Primary Eyes (<strong>Dry</strong> <strong>AMD</strong>/Soft Drusen) Drusen)<br />

Worse than 20/40 @ Baseline<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

-0.5 0.5<br />

-1.0 1.0<br />

-1.5 1.5<br />

-2.0 2.0<br />

RHEO<br />

1.0 Lines<br />

Tx<br />

PLACEBO<br />

Mean Line Change Over Time<br />

2.7 Lines<br />

Post-baseline Interval<br />

2.2 Lines 3.0 Line<br />

1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1<br />

-0.1<br />

-1.5<br />

Baseline 3 Month 6 Month 9 Month 12 Month<br />

(n=19/9) (n=19/9) (n=19/7) (n=16/8) (n=19/7)<br />

Lines of EDTRS BSCVA Change from Baseline Primary Eyes (<strong>Dry</strong> <strong>AMD</strong>/Soft<br />

p=0.0014<br />

repeated measures<br />

-1.1<br />

-1.9<br />

Pulido et al., Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2002 (interim analysis


<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>AMD</strong><br />

Regulatory Status<br />

Germany (European Community)<br />

Approved by Medical Device Regulations (CE-mark)<br />

No regular reimbursement by statutory health insurances<br />

Reimbursement by several private health insurances<br />

Canada<br />

USA<br />

Approved by Health Canada medical device regulations<br />

No reimbursement<br />

Investigational device<br />

No FDA approval


<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dry</strong> <strong>AMD</strong> –<br />

German Practice Guideline<br />

Non-exudative (dry) <strong>AMD</strong>, soft<br />

drusen, or/and initial atrophy and<br />

pigmentary abnormalities,<br />

visual acuity 20/32-20/200 (0.1-0.63)<br />

Not with exsudation, hemorrhage,<br />

advanced atrophy or fibrosis<br />

Late <strong>AMD</strong> of the partner eye is no<br />

contraindication<br />

Indication is not defined by levels of<br />

individual plasma parameters<br />

versity of Cologne University of<br />

Frankfurt<br />

.Dr.med. B. Kirchhof, Prof.Dr.med. R. Brunner Prof. Dr.med. F. Koch


Adverse events/side effects:<br />

Adverse events during <strong>Rheopheresis</strong>:<br />

Defined as any unexpected or symptomatic event, which has a possible, probable or definite causa<br />

relationship with the <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment. If events are reported after the treatment, specific<br />

time intervals have to be defined <strong>for</strong> particular events/problems be<strong>for</strong>e such events are shown in<br />

the classified RheoNet report. If there is more than one adverse event/side effect at the same time<br />

leading to a discontinuation of the treatment, the discontinuation shall be only accounted to the<br />

adverse event of highest clinical relevance.<br />

Adverse events after <strong>Rheopheresis</strong>:<br />

- severe hypotension/syncope within 24 hrs after <strong>Rheopheresis</strong>,<br />

- retinal bleeding withn 14 days after <strong>Rheopheresis</strong><br />

Vascular access problem:<br />

Any problem occurring with the vascular access <strong>for</strong> <strong>Rheopheresis</strong>, if a treatment is really<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med (e.g. difficult needle insertion, flow problem, dislocation of needle, several attempts of<br />

needle insertion, collapsed vein etc.). Hematoma/bleeding at the needle insertion is accounted as<br />

adverse event/side effect.<br />

Technical problem:<br />

Reporting to RheoNet – SOP<br />

Categories of Adverse Events / Side Effects / Problems<br />

Defined as reports on malfunction of the therapy machine or material (filters, tubes etc.) including<br />

also handling problems of personnel.


Reporting to RheoNet – SOP<br />

lasses of adverse events/side effects, vascular access problems, technical problems<br />

Centers only report / only ARI classifies!<br />

Class I All side effects/ problems, which were reported with the single <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment.<br />

Class II All reported side effects/problems of class I, which were followed by an intervention (e.g. infusion o<br />

saline etc.) and/or temporary break and/or discontinuation of the <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment.<br />

Class III All reported side effects/problems of class II, which necessitated discontinuation of the<br />

<strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment (no multiple references, discontinuation was assigned to one side<br />

effect/problem).<br />

Discontinuation of <strong>Rheopheresis</strong><br />

Discontinuation of <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> is registered, if the treated plasma volume was 70% or lower of the<br />

100% plasma volume target.<br />

Discontinuation due to side effects is always registered as discontinuation, if the extracorporeal<br />

circuit had started independent of the treated plasma volume.<br />

Discontinuation due to problems with venous access or technical problems is registered as<br />

discontinuation, if the treated plasma volume was already 500 ml or more. If the treated plasma<br />

volume was below 500 ml, the report must be evaluated with the individual case including<br />

discussion with the therapy center.


heopherese-zentrum.de<br />

o<br />

heo.com<br />

he International<br />

pheresis Competence<br />

ers<br />

pheresis-research.org<br />

- Registry Report<br />

Update March, March,<br />

2005<br />

4379 recorded <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> treatment<br />

717 treated patients (all indications)<br />

mean age 66 years<br />

476 pts. with <strong>AMD</strong> 66%<br />

mean age 74 years<br />

241 pts. with other indications 34%<br />

mean age 55 years


Number of patients<br />

oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

<strong>Age</strong> Distribution of Patients<br />

All indications <strong>AMD</strong><br />

240<br />

210<br />

180<br />

150<br />

120<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

0<br />

n = 714<br />

0-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100<br />

Years<br />

SSHL, tinnitus<br />

Number of patients<br />

Number of patients<br />

210<br />

180<br />

150<br />

120<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

n = 474<br />

0-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100<br />

Years<br />

n = 172<br />

0-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100<br />

Years<br />

21% of <strong>AMD</strong><br />

patients were<br />

≥ 80 years


oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

dverse Events / Side Effects (AE) and Vascular Access Problems (VAP<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Patients with <strong>AMD</strong>, all age groups<br />

n = 3618 protocols<br />

5,4 6,2<br />

2,0 1,8<br />

0,6<br />

Class I Class II Class III<br />

Adverse events / side effects Vascular access problems<br />

0,9<br />

All class III events<br />

(AE/SE + VAP, 1.49% of treatments)<br />

Dizziness/<br />

lightheaded<br />

0.03%<br />

Chilling<br />

0.08%<br />

Fever<br />

0.03%<br />

Vascular<br />

access<br />

problem<br />

0.88%<br />

Hemolysis/ blood<br />

in plasma circuit<br />

0.14%<br />

Hypotension<br />

0.30%<br />

Nausea/<br />

vomitting<br />

0.03%


oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

dverse Events / Side Effects (AE) and Vascular Access Problems (VAP<br />

“international international comparison”<br />

comparison<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

All indications, all age groups<br />

Canada Germany<br />

n = 872 protocols<br />

5,3<br />

1,0<br />

2,4<br />

0,5 0,1 0,1<br />

Class I Class II Class III<br />

Adverse events / side effects Vascular access problems<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

n = 3507 protocols<br />

5,7<br />

8,1<br />

2,0<br />

2,5<br />

0,7<br />

Class I Class II Class III<br />

Adverse events / side effects Vascular access problems<br />

1,3


oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

dverse Events/Side Effects (AE) and Vascular Access Problems (VAP) (VAP)<br />

Stratified by Experience of <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Center (international)<br />

E/SE<br />

ll indications<br />

20,0<br />

8,3<br />

2,1<br />

10,4<br />

3,8<br />

1,3<br />

6,4<br />

2,0 0,5<br />

2,4 1,4 0,4<br />

n < 20 n = 20-100 n = 100-1000 n > 1000<br />

20 centers<br />

Ø7<br />

treatments<br />

Class I Class II Class III %<br />

9 centers<br />

Ø 44<br />

treatments<br />

8 centers<br />

Ø 267<br />

treatments<br />

1 center<br />

1579<br />

treatments<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

VAP<br />

All indications<br />

30,4<br />

17,4<br />

9,4<br />

Class I Class II Class III<br />

17,2<br />

5,8 4,0<br />

7,3<br />

1,9 1,1<br />

1,5 0,3 0,1<br />

n < 20 n = 20-100 n = 100-1000 n > 1000<br />

20 centers<br />

Ø7<br />

treatments<br />

n = number of treatments<br />

9 centers<br />

Ø 44<br />

treatments<br />

8 centers<br />

Ø 267<br />

treatments<br />

1 center<br />

1579<br />

treatments


oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

dverse Events/Side Effects (AE) and Vascular Access Problems (VAP (VAP<br />

<strong>Age</strong> <strong>Related</strong> Frequencies<br />

Class I events<br />

All indications<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

n = 3507 protocols<br />

0-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100<br />

Years<br />

Adverse events / side effects Vascular access problems<br />

Class II events<br />

All indications<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

n = 3507 protocols<br />

0-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100<br />

Years<br />

21% of <strong>AMD</strong><br />

patients were<br />

≥ 80 years<br />

Adverse events / side effects Vascular access problems


oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

Hypotensions<br />

“per patient”<br />

All indications (n = 582 patients) and <strong>AMD</strong> (n = 355 patients), all age groups<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

10,8% 12,7%<br />

At least 1<br />

therapy with<br />

class I<br />

hypotension<br />

5,9% 6,6%<br />

At least 1<br />

therapy with<br />

class II<br />

hypotension<br />

All indications <strong>AMD</strong><br />

1,9% 2,6%<br />

At least 1<br />

therapy with<br />

class III<br />

hypotension


oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

Patients<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

n = 2793 protocols<br />

87,3%<br />

Hypotension per Patient<br />

“by by total number occurring with <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> series” series (<strong>AMD</strong>)<br />

8,7%<br />

3,2%<br />

0,9% 0,0% 0,0% 0,0%<br />

0,0% 0,0%<br />

93,4%<br />

4,6% 0,3% 0,0% 0,0%<br />

1,7% 0,0% 0,0% 0,0%<br />

97,4%<br />

2,0%<br />

0,0% 0,0% 0,0%<br />

0,6% 0,0% 0,0% 0,0%<br />

Class I Class II Class III<br />

Without hypotension 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 therapies with hypotension


oNet Registry Update March 2005<br />

Hypotensions<br />

35%<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

30,7%<br />

19,4%<br />

8,1%<br />

6,5%<br />

Hypotension per Protocol<br />

“occurring occurring at which treatment of a <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> series” series (<strong>AMD</strong>)<br />

n = 2365 protocols<br />

11,3%<br />

6,5%<br />

6,5%<br />

Class I (62<br />

hypotensions)<br />

11,3%<br />

Number of therapy:<br />

17,7%<br />

8,1%<br />

4,8% 4,8% 4,8%<br />

4,8% 3,2%<br />

1,6%<br />

Class II (31<br />

hypotensions)<br />

8,1%<br />

3,2%<br />

1,6% 1,6% 1,6%<br />

1,6%<br />

0,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Class III (11<br />

hypotensions)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8


isual Acuity Be<strong>for</strong>e and After Initial <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Serie<br />

VA after<br />

eopheresis<br />

of 194 eyes<br />

ETDRS)<br />

1,1<br />

1<br />

0,9<br />

0,8<br />

0,7<br />

0,6<br />

0,5<br />

0,4<br />

0,3<br />

0,2<br />

0,1<br />

0<br />

n= 194 Eyes of 135 Patients with dry <strong>AMD</strong><br />

.7 <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Treatments within ∅ 16 weeks, ∅ 23 weeks between opthalmological examinatio<br />

110 eyes<br />

(57 %)<br />

21 eyes<br />

(11%)<br />

63 eyes<br />

(32%)<br />

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 1,1<br />

VA be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>Rheopheresis</strong><br />

RheoNet-Registry, April


hange in ETDRS-Lines ETDRS ETDRS-Lines Lines after Initial <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Series<br />

ompared to Baseline after Mean Follow-Up Follow Follow-Up Up of 23 Weeks<br />

loss ≥ 3 lines<br />

0%<br />

loss ≥ 2 lines<br />

2%<br />

loss ≥ 1 line<br />

5%<br />

gain ≥ 3 lines<br />

7%<br />

n= 128 Eyes of 91 Patients with dry <strong>AMD</strong><br />

gain ≥ 2 lines<br />

12%<br />

no difference<br />

35%<br />

gain ≥ 1 line<br />

39%<br />

RheoNet-Registry, April 200


Mean Change in ETDRS-Lines after Initial <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> Series<br />

ompared to No Treatment Control and Placebo (Sham-Apheresis<br />

Mean Change in Lines<br />

1,5<br />

1<br />

0,5<br />

0<br />

-0,5<br />

-1<br />

-1,5<br />

Baseline MAC-1 (11 eyes)<br />

MIRA-1 (28 eyes)<br />

RheoNet update (128 of 194 eyes)<br />

MIRA-1 Placebo (15 eyes)<br />

MAC-1 Control (11 eyes)<br />

after <strong>Rheopheresis</strong><br />

1,22<br />

1,2<br />

0,82<br />

-0,4<br />

-1,1<br />

MAC-1<br />

(subgroup with soft drusen)<br />

MIRA-1(Interim-Analysis<br />

RheoNet-Analysis<br />

2005<br />

23 wk follow-up period (mean<br />

MIRA-1<br />

(Placebo)<br />

24 wk follow-up interval<br />

MAC-1<br />

(no treatment control)<br />

21 wk follow-up interval<br />

RheoNet-Registry, April 200


RheoNet – Registry<br />

Summary<br />

RheoNet-Registry<br />

RheoNet Registry is an integral part of interdisciplinary quality managemen<br />

of <strong>Rheopheresis</strong>.<br />

Based on interdisciplinary cooperation <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> is a safe ambulatory<br />

treatment <strong>for</strong> elderly patients with <strong>AMD</strong>.<br />

RheoNet-Registry will be continuously updated and report on data analysis<br />

<strong>Dry</strong> <strong>AMD</strong> – Indication <strong>for</strong> <strong>Rheopheresis</strong><br />

Results of the controlled randomised MAC-I Trial from Cologne,<br />

+ the controlled Utah-Trial, + MIRA-1 Interimanalysis, + experience of the<br />

Dept. Ophthalmol. at Cologne University with app. 300 Patienten including<br />

long-term treatment, + RheoNet data justify to offer <strong>Rheopheresis</strong> to highrisk<br />

patients with dry <strong>AMD</strong>, who otherwise don‘t have a therapeutic<br />

alternative (in countries with medical device approval, i.e. Europe/Germany<br />

Canada, Japan).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!