10.07.2015 Views

Effects of homogeneity in wort boiling

Effects of homogeneity in wort boiling

Effects of homogeneity in wort boiling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>homogeneity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>wort</strong> boil<strong>in</strong>gThomas Buehler*(1), Marc Schreder(1), Dietmar Kaltner(2), Willi Mitter(2), (1) Huppmann,Kitz<strong>in</strong>gen, Germany, (2) Hopste<strong>in</strong>er, Ma<strong>in</strong>burg, GermanyAbstractHomogeneity is one <strong>of</strong> the key aspects with regard to quality and efficiency not only <strong>in</strong> <strong>wort</strong> boil<strong>in</strong>g.Evenly distributed reaction rates throughout the content <strong>of</strong> large volume vessels are a majorchallenge <strong>in</strong> all batch processes. Better <strong>homogeneity</strong> leads to improved product conversion, thustotal reaction times, (i.e. <strong>wort</strong> boil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals), can be reduced. This results <strong>in</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs not only <strong>in</strong>time but also <strong>in</strong> fuel energy.The work presented here is based on <strong>in</strong>stallations <strong>of</strong> the Jetstar ® , the new <strong>in</strong>ternal boilersystem from Huppmann. This boiler design is the first to apply a submerged jet stream tocirculate the <strong>wort</strong> <strong>in</strong> the kettle.While the effect <strong>of</strong> a submerged jet for improved <strong>wort</strong> <strong>homogeneity</strong> has been <strong>in</strong>vestigated byDelgado et al. <strong>in</strong> great detail on a pilot scale basis us<strong>in</strong>g tracers, temperature measurement andflow simulation modell<strong>in</strong>g, the work presented here <strong>in</strong>vestigates technological evidence <strong>of</strong> thesubjet improvements.The paper shows results based on DMS-P degradation that <strong>in</strong>dicates faster reaction rates.DMS-P breakdown has been studied <strong>in</strong> great detail. The first order reaction is ma<strong>in</strong>lytemperature dependent and thus changes <strong>in</strong> reaction rate can be put down to temperaturevariation, if all other conditions such as brew length, malt batch or water quality rema<strong>in</strong> constant.In addition, this paper presents technological and energy aspects associated with improved<strong>homogeneity</strong>. In cooperation with Hopste<strong>in</strong>er the effects <strong>of</strong> a system upgrade from an exist<strong>in</strong>g<strong>wort</strong> kettle with external calandria to the Jetstar <strong>in</strong>ternal boiler system were <strong>in</strong>vestigated from ahop utilisation and beer quality po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view.Key words: <strong>wort</strong> boil<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>homogeneity</strong>, hop utilisation, DMS-P degradation, subjet flowpatternIntroductionAccord<strong>in</strong>g to Schwill-Miedaner and Miedaner [7] , “a basic requirement for constant <strong>wort</strong> quality is akettle <strong>in</strong> which the contents are homogenously distributed dur<strong>in</strong>g the boil<strong>in</strong>g process“. To meet thisrequirement, the equipment manufacturers have cont<strong>in</strong>ually optimised their boiler systems. Withsystems rely<strong>in</strong>g on natural circulation especially the heat<strong>in</strong>g phase from lauter<strong>in</strong>g to boil<strong>in</strong>g,temperature is critical. Long dwell times associated with <strong>in</strong>creased thermal load <strong>in</strong> the boiler tubescan occur when the <strong>wort</strong> is distributed unevenly <strong>in</strong> the kettle and are thus detrimental for <strong>wort</strong>quality. In plants with an energy storage system, <strong>wort</strong> can be pre-heated rapidly and gently toboil<strong>in</strong>g temperature through the use <strong>of</strong> an external plate heat exchanger, so that the critical phase<strong>of</strong> heat<strong>in</strong>g-up <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternal boiler is completely elim<strong>in</strong>ated.Other suppliers opted for systems that are pump-assisted <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with <strong>in</strong>ternal or externalboilers. While this improved residence time <strong>in</strong> the boiler tube primarily dur<strong>in</strong>g heat<strong>in</strong>g-up, this doesnot solve the <strong>homogeneity</strong> problem <strong>in</strong> the kettle. As Delgado and Baars [1-3, 5] have shown, circulation<strong>of</strong> <strong>wort</strong> by means <strong>of</strong> a deflector can generate short-circuit flows which are an obstacle to uniformtreatment. To achieve uniform distribution, dead zones andFormatted: Font: 10 ptFormatted: Font: 11 pt


short-circuit flows must be prevented. It is required that the <strong>wort</strong> circulates vertically downwards <strong>in</strong>“piston flow” and is drawn-<strong>in</strong> as evenly as possible by the boiler (see Figure 2). Strong, <strong>in</strong>tensivecurrents are largely prevented by discharg<strong>in</strong>g the heated <strong>wort</strong> below the <strong>wort</strong> level through asubmerged jet orifice. Firstly, because the <strong>wort</strong> is distributed evenly <strong>in</strong> circumferential andhorizontal direction and secondly, because the steam bubbles <strong>in</strong> the <strong>wort</strong> will cause higher energydissipation and thus lower the speed <strong>of</strong> the <strong>wort</strong> current better than a free jet. The new Jetstarboil<strong>in</strong>g system from Huppmann operates accord<strong>in</strong>g to this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. Further details regard<strong>in</strong>g theoperat<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple and the process options have been published by Buehler and B<strong>in</strong>kert [4] .The two phase boil<strong>in</strong>g conceptThanks to the subjet orifice, it is possible to divide the <strong>wort</strong> boil<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>in</strong>to two phases:Phase 1 Thermal conversion (Figure 1): Dur<strong>in</strong>g this phase, <strong>wort</strong> flows out <strong>of</strong> the boiler through thesubjet orifice below the <strong>wort</strong> level. The known processes such as hop isomerisation, prote<strong>in</strong>coagulation, degradation <strong>of</strong> flavour precursors (e.g. DMS precursor), sterilisation, flavour andaroma formation take place. Homogeneous temperature distribution is achieved throughout theentire content <strong>of</strong> the kettle by gentle circulation. The boiler can be pressurised slightly dur<strong>in</strong>g thisphase so as to <strong>in</strong>crease the reaction rates at the higher temperature level. High circulation ratescomb<strong>in</strong>ed with low <strong>in</strong>terfacial temperatures at the boiler tube conserve foam-positive components.The steam bubbles produced <strong>in</strong> the boiler tube provide for a high momentum exchange below the<strong>wort</strong> surface thanks to the two-phase flow at the boiler outlet. The steam bubbles tend to collapseaga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>wort</strong>, and only very little evaporation occurs. Due to the homogeneous distribution <strong>in</strong>the kettle, the duration <strong>of</strong> this thermal conversion can be selected irrespective <strong>of</strong> the requiredevaporation. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the content <strong>of</strong> flavour precursors, thermal conversion generally lasts 50to 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The goal is to reduce the precursors <strong>of</strong> undesired flavour compounds as far asnecessary and to achieve maximum conversion <strong>of</strong> hop acids.4127


Figure 1: In phase 1, the subjet flow ensures optimum <strong>homogeneity</strong> <strong>in</strong> the kettlePhase 2 For evaporation (Figure 2), the <strong>wort</strong> is distributed across the two-level <strong>wort</strong> spreader, asthe subjet orifice is closed. The large surface created thereby enables <strong>in</strong>tensive evaporation <strong>of</strong>volatiles. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the desired f<strong>in</strong>al values and the target orig<strong>in</strong>al gravity, this evaporationphase cont<strong>in</strong>ues for 10 to 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The process can be <strong>in</strong>tensified bydynamic low-pressure boil<strong>in</strong>g. This leads to faster evaporation <strong>of</strong> undesirable flavour compoundsdue to the <strong>in</strong>tense <strong>in</strong>termittent boil<strong>in</strong>g. As soon as the predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed pressure is reached asystematic pressure reduction starts under strictly def<strong>in</strong>ed conditions. As pressure is reduced, theboil<strong>in</strong>g temperature <strong>in</strong> the vessel decreases accompanied by a rapid steam bubble formationthroughout the entire kettle. This “controlled boil<strong>in</strong>g delay” results <strong>in</strong> a very large gas/liquid contactsurface, thus ensur<strong>in</strong>g optimum stripp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> volatile odorous substances.4128Figure 2: In phase 2, discharg<strong>in</strong>g via the two-level <strong>wort</strong> spreader ensures <strong>in</strong>tensiveevaporation.Experiments: DMS-P breakdownThe effect <strong>of</strong> better <strong>homogeneity</strong> with subjet boil<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong>vestigated at a large <strong>in</strong>dustrial brewery <strong>in</strong>a conventional <strong>wort</strong> kettle with a cast <strong>wort</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> 710 hl. The DMS precursor was analysed. It isknown from literature [6] that DMS-P breakdown is <strong>in</strong> essence a temperature-dependent first orderreaction. This is shown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g equation:


c = c 0e −kt Eq. 1withk: reaction ratec: concentrationc0: <strong>in</strong>itial concentrationt: time.The reaction rate k is ma<strong>in</strong>ly affected by temperature. If all other boil<strong>in</strong>g conditions are keptconstant, reaction rate will be a function <strong>of</strong> temperature only. Figure 3 shows breakdown curves ata range <strong>of</strong> temperatures.Time [m<strong>in</strong>.]4123-e16.03.07Figure 3: DMS-P breakdown curves at different temperaturesIn the large kettle experiments, <strong>wort</strong> samples were taken, chilled immediately and later on analysedfor DMS-P. This was done for brews with conventional <strong>in</strong>ternal boiler and subjet boil<strong>in</strong>g. It can beseen <strong>in</strong> Figure 4 that <strong>in</strong> subjet operation breakdown is quicker. The effect relates to a temperature<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 1.8-2.2 K. The higher temperature can be attributed to the more even temperaturedistribution with less cold spots <strong>in</strong> the <strong>wort</strong> kettle <strong>in</strong> subjet operation. The general advantage is thehigher conversion rate <strong>in</strong>side the <strong>wort</strong> kettle which can be used for shorter conversion and reducedevaporation.1.00.90.80.7


DMS [µg/l] 89.0 70.0 79.5DMS-P [µg/l] 64 28 46Bitterness [EBC 8.8] 35.0 38.0 30.5Alpha acids [mg/l] 10.9 14.4 14.3Iso-alpha-acids [mg/l] 25.4 29.1 22.0Total soluble nitrogen [mg/l] 119.0 128.8 123.9Coag. nitrogen [g/100 ml] 2.9 2.3 2.6Hop analysisTotal alpha acids [g] 1565 1775 1670Cast-out volume hot [hl] 212.0 222.0 272.5Alpha acid dos<strong>in</strong>g [g/hl cast<strong>wort</strong>] 7.38 8.0 6.13Hop yield <strong>in</strong> <strong>wort</strong>BU <strong>in</strong> cast <strong>wort</strong> (%) 47.4 47.5 49.8Iso-alpha acid <strong>in</strong> cast <strong>wort</strong>(%)34.4 36.3 35.8A sensory evaluation by the beer tast<strong>in</strong>g panel <strong>of</strong> Hopste<strong>in</strong>er was made <strong>of</strong> the Jetstar beersfrom the optimised brew with a special focus on hop bitterness and the quality <strong>of</strong> hopflavour. The taste scores <strong>in</strong>dicate that the beer has a clear and very pleasant bitternesstaste impression. The smell <strong>of</strong> hops is weak and pleasant with typical hoppy aroma notes.Figure 5: Flavour analysis <strong>of</strong> the optimised brew with reduced evaporation


Figure 6: Flavour analysis <strong>of</strong> the optimised brew with reduced evaporationConclusionAs an overall result it can be noted that the <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>of</strong> the Jetstar resulted <strong>in</strong> slightly better hoputilisation. In addition, the cleaner character <strong>of</strong> the beer caused the bitterness to be more apparent.To allow for these effects, alpha acid dos<strong>in</strong>g was reduced. With DMS-P-breakdown, the reactionrate illustrates the effect <strong>of</strong> the Jetstar on <strong>wort</strong> <strong>homogeneity</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>wort</strong> kettle. The higher reactionrates could be realised with the same or even lower energy <strong>in</strong>put only by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g a subjet flow.The possibilities to adapt and adjust the process phases provide more flexibility. Better<strong>homogeneity</strong> made it possible to reduce total evaporation without compromis<strong>in</strong>g on beer flavourquality.Literature[1] Baars, A., Herbster, T, Schmidt, Th., Delgado, A., Realisierung e<strong>in</strong>er technologiegerechtenDurchströmung der Würzepfanne mit Innenkocher durch gezielte Modifikation der Geometrie,Brauwelt, 144 (2004), 38, 1164 – 1166[2] Baars, A., Werner, F., Delgado, A.: Untersuchung der Strömung <strong>in</strong> e<strong>in</strong>er Würzepfanne mitInnenkocher , Technologisches Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, Weihenstephan, 2000[3] Biwański, T., Baars, A., Kowalczyk, W., Delgado, A., Schmidt, Th. und Buehler, Th., Thesubjet-<strong>wort</strong> boil<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>of</strong> low expenditure and high benefit, EBC-Congress, EBC-Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs,Prag, 2005[4] Buehler, T. and B<strong>in</strong>kert, G., New flexibility <strong>in</strong> <strong>wort</strong> boil<strong>in</strong>g, Brauwelt International 24(2006), 4, 245-257[5] Delgado A., Baars, A., Kurz, T., Hartmann C.: Schaumentwicklung und Schaumzerstörungbeim Betrieb e<strong>in</strong>er Würzepfanne mit Innenkocher, Technologisches Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, Weihenstephan,2003[6] Hertel, M.; Tippmann, J.; Sommer, K.; Glas, K.: Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong> the recreat<strong>in</strong>gk<strong>in</strong>etics <strong>of</strong> flavour-components dur<strong>in</strong>g the boil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>wort</strong>, Monatsschrift für Brauwissenschaft, 60(2006), 45-55[7] Schwill-Miedaner, A. und Miedaner, H., Würzekochung – heutiger Stand der Technologie undTechnik, Brauwelt 141 (2001), 18, 670 - 673

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!