The Matrix Deciphered - Freedom From Covert Harassment and ...

We like to believe we are spontaneous and have “choice”, but when viewed objectively thatsubjective feeling of “choice” becomes nothing more than a low probability of neural firingevents. When people describe their decisions, they often say I had no “choice”. This is simply astrong probability of neural firing events. Logic often dictates the strongest neural firingpathways given certain possible actions. You have just learned a basic principle ofpsychophysics by mapping the subjective experience of “choice” to the objective causalities ofbrain dynamics.Politicians use the tactic of discrediting their opponent threw mudslinging. Making up or diggingup dirt that makes people question the honesty and validity of their opponent‟s statements is thegoal of many campaigns these days. The CIA and foreign intelligence agencies use skeletons ofpoliticians to control them threw blackmail. If someone gets out of line, a leak to the press is allit takes to disable them as a force of change.Lawyers use the discrediting tactic on witnesses. By trying to demonstrate to the jury a pattern oflying, misperceptions or ulterior motives, they can successfully discredit a witness.While all these traditional tactics have proven fruitful through out time without waningeffectiveness, the agencies involved in extreme cover-ups prefer another tactic that seems to havewithstood the test of time too. That is labeling someone “paranoid schizophrenic” or mentally ill.Once that label has been attached to someone, almost all testimony will be disbelieved. Themilitary has employed this tactic since the 60‟s to get rebellious soldiers and others locked up inmental hospitals. But since the weapons testing of neurological disruptor technology has begunon the general population beginning in the early 60‟s and then stepped up to full throttle in 1976,the scope of what is considered mentally ill had to be reprogrammed into a broader definition forthe general population. The movie “A beautiful Mind” was timed to program people with thenotion that even geniuses can be mentally ill. So even if a brilliant person, whose logic isimpeccable, describes hearing voices their account should be dismissed and they may be violentand dangerous if they believe their delusion. Perhaps, but if you look at the details of the way themind works, it is extremely unlikely for the majority of the brain to function perfectly especiallythe higher level cognitive functions, and the auditory and visual pathways to be severelycompromised specifically. When one delves into the details of the science of the mind andcurrent weapons capabilities, it becomes obvious that the more probable event is actually themore complicated in terms of the history of the U.S. human effects weapons testing programsand the science behind it counter intuitive to the Occam‟s razor principle at first blush.Strategic DeceptionActions must be judged in the context of all possibilities to understand their meaning, the actor'smotives, and their relevance.Another tactic that has successfully been employed by the government agents to help hide theirsecret concentration camps and human experimentation using this technology is by sendingagents to pose as victims. Their task is to be outspoken and as crazy sounding as possible. I haverun into at least two of these actors. This kind of warfare has commonly been used by the CIA to