Weapons of Mass Coercion - Freedom From Covert Harassment ...

driven computer could not only emulate psychic energies, but could also transmit themto a discrete individual, and do so much more efficiently than the genuine psychicattacks he had intercepted for previous clients. Attacks on us, he reported, were highlycontrolled; they varied in intensity, form, and energetic frequency; and all wereobviously generated by remote operators working with a bank of machines of some sortthat sent out electromagnetic beams. We therefore came to call the phenomenon “EMattacks.”“When I first detected this,” P.G. told me, “I said to myself, ‘This just can’t beright—I must be mistaken—it can’t be a machine!’ I could not accept it emotionally atfirst. I was beside myself. It is just so scandalous . . . It had an entirely indifferent energysignature; you can sense it having no feeling.”Some activists stayed apart entirely, in disbelief, even though P.G. could detectattacks against them using his own advanced “remote viewing” skills; but these folksrefused to believe it.One targeted activist went it alone. A member of the Buddhist Peace Fellowshipand a hardware engineer in Silicon Valley, he took it upon himself to come up with ahardware solution to the bombardment against him. He built an enclosed space formedby conducting material that he believed would protect a section of his home. (Known asa Faraday cage, such enclosures are routinely used to protect electronic equipmentfrom lightning strikes and electromagnetic radiation.) But this approach simply did notwork. This middle-aged man soon became sick and distraught; his girlfriend left him; hislandlord evicted him because of his claims to be under attack by some invisible force.And then this man, a beloved, intelligent, well-educated, and gentle activist, disappearedentirely, moving to a mountainous area to escape attack.Because of this episode, the targeted individuals in the group were severely setback for a time. I myself suffered over 20 episodes of attack, with most events closelywitnessed by others, including an MD physician who came to fully believe my claims.Now ill and distraught, I quit the 9/11 movement and entirely closed my bookpublishing business. My one full-time employee had also been attacked and knew it; shehad quickly left the company with my approval earlier on.Finally, I put an entire house-full of furniture in storage and left the country forsix weeks, sojourning in Cyprus, Greece. I did indeed shake off the attacks through thisdrastic action, but upon my return, I needed extensive medical treatment for a severeimmune system collapse and multiple related problems, such as months of fatigue, lossof libido, numerous allergies I had never before experienced, and entrenched viral andbacterial infections.During the entire process, P.G. and I also became convinced that cultivation ofa spiritual consciousness, devoted prayer, and cultivation of an energetically healthy bodyor “biofield” all offer effective ways to interdict at least some EM attacks.On the other hand, the attacks we witnessed varied in kind and intensity inalmost every case; one could not necessarily be prepared for every form of energy thatthe perpetrators had to throw at you. And some attacks were “diabolical”; attempts todisable or dislodge them with healing or loving energy (a well-known shamanictechnique when faced with a hostile psychic attack) actually empowered the attack; everyand any kind of interdiction energy actually fed these attacks. That’s another reason whyP.G. early on decided to wait for the energy zapping to cease before he performed the“clearing.”But five years of hindsight have convinced me of an additional, crucial insight:The perpetrators of covert energy attacks and those carrying out mind control of the4

population will one day be rehabilitated with compassion once they are brought tojustice; hating, attacking, or even torturing them in kind would be the height of folly.And, forgiveness of such evil acts is inevitably a “transpersonal process”—that is, onlydivine love and mercy is able to overcome and heal such monstrous darkness.Fortunately, divine love and mercy is abundantly (infinitely) available and can be invokedin all times and places, and you and I can be its conduit. The circuit of the divinepresence overcomes all things, and provides the assurance that there is ultimatelynothing to fear. The “worldly” pursuit of justice according to the rule of law should bepursued with this theological principle in mind.Before this macabre episode came to an end, P.G. had cleared nearly ten victimsfrom attack in many more than 50 incidents. And in his estimation, our group was nothingless than a beta test-site for new variants of EM weapon attacks—unique softwarealgorithms under study, as it were—because of the astonishing variety of energies used ineach case.It is hard to imagine what might have happened to many of us without P.G.’sheroic assistance. And to this day, we are all unsure of how perpetrators are able to singleout individuals, hold them under surveillance, and pinpoint them from a remote locationfor a particular attack, although this essay offers some ideas based on preliminary research.Unprecedented dangers for activists posed by EM weapons“EMF, used in nefarious ways, can destabilize the brain,and potentially generate feelings of violence or apathy.”—Dr. Dean Radin, Institute of Noetic SciencesThe above instances are vivid illustrations of a widespread threat. Increasing evidencepoints to the likelihood that hundreds and perhaps thousands of Americans and overseasvictims are now, this very moment, being targeted by such EM weapons—just one classof the nonlethal tools of control that are being deployed in a brave new world of covertand overt warfare. They are designed not necessarily to kill, but to neutralize, sicken,and maim psychologically.Just as disturbing, such electronic harassment is increasingly being deployed inrandom criminal actions against innocents—not only activists or “enemies of the state.” Ibelieve that, like the 9/11 truth case cited above, these folks may also be test subjects forthe next generation of devices, now targeted worldwide (as we will see). Their dilemmamay constitute a dress rehearsal for the futuristic crowd control that many believe may berequired in the coming years and decades of domestic and global unrest.Meanwhile, less threatening forms of DEW technology—that is, EM weapons ofthe overt variety—are now mature and are poised for use on overseas battlefields.Although this article is focused on the covert uses of more advanced weapons, the“above-ground” use of DEWs is becoming better known and is occasionally covered bythe mainstream press. But again, these weapons are just the tip of the iceberg; for, whenunderstood in connection with massive energy-related projects like HAARP (see below)as well as the aerosol spraying of earth’s atmosphere (known colloquially as“chemtrails”)—which turn the entire planet into a site for “Star-Wars” energy warfare—the covert aspect of the phenomenon truly constitutes a secret holocaust.5

The accounts above and the data from other cases in my possession illustrate, Ibelieve, at least four areas of vulnerability faced by activists or others in the line of fire.Especially at risk are those whose work touches a nerve in one of the many criminalizeddomains of “deep politics,” or whose concerns may perhaps cross over into classifiedresearch of some covert operation:• The first area of vulnerability is the basic fact that this is an era of everadvancing“neuroweapons” and, at the same time, these are dangerous times ofhigh conflict. Mind control research is now far advanced and the tools of politicalcontrol are global in scope; but the political, social, and economic problemshumanity faces today guarantee that the turmoil in the streets will also be globalin scope.• Unfortunately, another area in which we are vulnerable is that most of us arefar too unaware of the nature of the tools being deployed. We need to geteducated about technologies that are the result of decades of classified research,but this effort is not easy as there are numerous categories of political controltechnology (PCT). This article shows that the arsenal even includesenvironmental weapons such as HAARP and “aerosol operations.”• Much of the risk faced by potentially targeted individuals arises from thedifficulty of tracing the source of most energy attacks; the invisible perpetratorsand their weapons are virtually untraceable. The “evidence” in a case of EMattack can therefore appear (at least to the uninformed) to be entirely subjective.• Fourth, too many of us are naïve about the willingness of our powerful, wellfunded,Machiavellian opponents to use exotic weapons. Few of us can fathomthat experiments similar to those that took place in the MK-ULTRA era (seebelow) still take place—likely on an even wider scale.These vulnerabilities, and the undeniable reality of these unseen tools of covert attack,make our long-past innocence about inviolability of personal sovereignty seem outdatedand primitive by contrast: For there was once a time when the human brain—and theprecious human mind that houses it and the “bio-field” that envelops both—belonged ina domain of privacy protected in the U.S. Constitution. In classic notions of Westernculture, human consciousness was once thought to represent the sacrosanct site ofthought and choice. The brain/mind was the inviolable domain reserved for thepersonal discovery of truth, the site of the private pursuit of happiness, the oncesovereigninner world of human free will.But today, our bodies and inner world are increasingly fair game for government“mind control” and political-control technologies wielded by rogue groups, and thisrepresents a leap that goes far beyond the more familiar world of manipulative corporatePR and advertising. Destructive and deceptive means of controlling and terrifyingcitizens—tools that are not even acknowledged to exist—are wielded by an undergroundworld of compartmentalized contractors who actually do deploy electromagneticweapons on targets selected by their superiors. And these DEWs are just one category oftool in the current mind-control apparatus, just one division of the armamentarium nowtechnically classed as “nonlethal weapons.”6

Such electromagnetic weapons—also known as “new weapons,” exotic weapons,EM weapons, MC (“mind control”) weapons, political control technology (PCT), orpsychotronics—are available in an incredible range of uses in the electromagneticspectrum and beyond. Such “neuroweapons” are targeted at the human nervous systemand the brain itself; they come in many varieties, and are used worldwide against activistsand “enemies of the state.”“The weapons operate at the speed of light; they can kill, torture and enslave; butthe public are largely unaware that they exist, because these weapons operate by stealthand leave no physical evidence,” writes Harlan Girard of the Institute of Science inSociety in London. “By widely dispersing the involuntary human test-subjects, andvehemently attacking their credibility, it has been possible for the United States toproceed with these human experiments unhindered by discussions or criticisms, letalone opposition.” 2Yet, at just the same time, and virtually to the same extent, neuroscientists arediscovering unknown and unacknowledged powers and properties resident in this verysame nexus of biological function, thought, feeling, and reflection. There is, indeed,an upside of the “neurotechnology” that too often translates into weaponry. Researchersare in possession of fantastic new scientific knowledge of higher human capacities ofthe brain and nervous system, not to mention the psyche and “higher mind.” To itscredit, current science has shown that the pineal gland probably produces DMT, achemical agent linked to mystical states. A division of neuroscience research hasaccumulated evidence that the brain is somehow “wired” for “God experience.” Brainscientists have done illuminating research into the Tantric Yoga teaching that thenervous system contains the potential of kundalini, said to be the seed and secret of theevolution of higher consciousness.Indeed, we might say that just to the extent that we have the ability to use newtechnology and science to enhance consciousness, to the very same extent we nowhave the ability to use the same tools to destroy the mind and psyche as weapons. Andthe use of these weapons on unsuspecting victims is no doubt soul-destroying for theperpetrators.The early days of political control technologyRadio frequency and microwave broadcasts designed to produce specific thoughtsor moods, such as compliance and complacency, promise a method of mind controlthat poses immense danger to all societies – tyranny without terror.—Dr. Robert O. Becker, author of The Body ElectricThe U.S. government first woke up to the threat of energy weapons when, in the early1960s, it made the sensational discovery that the Soviets had been directingelectromagnetic and microwave emissions at the U.S embassy in Moscow. This covertbeaming caused a wide range of documented physical and mental illness among U.S.personnel and very likely led to the eventual death of the U.S. Ambassador himself.(Ambassador Walter Stoessel died of a rare blood disease similar to leukemia.)The reality of these attacks was first detected in 1960. According to at least someaccounts, this discovery—among other challenges of the Cold War—led to the initiationof a large and complex research project funded by the CIA and code-named “Project7

PANDORA,” which was initially tasked with the study of the effects of the Sovietmicrowaves on both animals and humans, while it secretly studied the “bio-effects” ofthe secret beams on personnel and even monkeys that were placed in the embassy.(Typically, the CIA did not inform embassy personnel of the Soviet’s energy attack onthem for many years, while they observed the effects.) PANDORA scientists later carriedout classified studies on monkeys in laboratories, with significant results. Researcherssoon discovered that animal brain waves could be altered directly by electrical fields; likea tuning fork, their brains would fall in phase with electromagnetic waves directed atthem if modulated at the right frequency. These waves could easily pass through theskull, which normally protected the central nervous system from outside influence.Many of us don’t understand that electromagnetism is intrinsic to human anatomyand, along with biochemical changes, actually controls human physiology. For example,any time a muscle moves there are electrical discharges. Brain waves are themselveselectrical; indeed, the data and information that is detected by the human senses, movesinward to the central nervous system and then on to the brain—is comprised ofelectrical signals. Enzymes are electrically influenced, cell division has electricalfeatures, wound healing is electrical, and the heartbeat itself is an electrical impulse.Finally, in April 1976, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger sent the followingtelegram to the U.S. Embassy in Moscow that summarized the conclusions of theagency’s covert study of the Moscow signal.Subject: Radiation and UHF and Electromagnetic DangersBeginning in 1960 the Soviet Union directed the high frequency beams of radiation at theU.S. Embassy in Moscow which were calculated not to pick up intelligence but causephysiological effects on personnel. The effects the Soviets calculated to achieve in thepersonnel serving (at least as early as 1960) included (A) Malaise (B) Irritability, (C)Extreme fatigue. At this time the Soviets believed that the induced effects were temporary.Subsequently, it has been verified that the effects are not temporary. Definitely tied to suchradiation and the UHF/VHF electromagnetic waves are: (A) Cataracts, (B) Bloodchanges that induce heart attacks, (C) Malignancies, (D) Circulatory problems, and(E) Permanent deterioration of the nervous system. In most cases the after-effects do notbecome evident until long after exposure—a decade or more. 3Such was the first known formal high-level report on what are the now-familiarsymptoms of EM attack being reported all over the globe.But even by the late 1960s, according to the History Channel and many othersources, U.S. government-funded scientists like Dr. Robert Becker and independentscientists such as Dr. Andrija Puharich had discovered monumental facts aboutelectromagnetic frequencies and human consciousness. Puharich showed, for example,that ELF electromagnetic fields (i.e., extremely low frequencies that are measured inHertz, or “Hz”), if delivered to subjects under controlled conditions, had specific andpredictable neurological effects if calibrated to very specific frequencies to the nearesthundredth of a Hertz:• 6.6 Hz could predictably cause depression in a normal subject• 7.83 Hz led to an altered state associated with a pleasant feeling• 10.80 Hz led to “riotous behavior” 48

Normal brain waves naturally occur in a band between 1 and 20 Hz. (See Appendix A fora quick primer on types of brain waves.) Interestingly, typical brain waves happen to fallinto the same range as the so-called “earth” frequencies—notably, the 7.83 Hertz-earthresonance frequency known as the Schumann Resonance—the Earth’s own natural“brain rhythm.”Perhaps even more interesting is the fact that the earth’s atmosphere, like thehuman brain, is in part regulated both by magnetism and electromagnetism; and thisshould not be surprising since we humans and all living things are born, live, grow, andresonate within it’s canopy—or “cavity,” as independent researcher Nicholas Jonesdescribes it:The Earth is wrapped in a donut-shaped magnetic field. Circular [magnetic]lines of flux continuously descend into the North Pole and emerge from theSouth Pole. The ionosphere, an electromagnetic-wave conductor, 100 kmsabove the earth, consists of a layer of electrically charged particles acting as ashield from solar winds. Naturally occurring electromagnetic waves arerelated to the electrical activity in the atmosphere and are thought to becaused by multiple lightning storms. Collectively, these waves (i.e., theSchumann Resonance) are strongest at 7.8 Hz. These are “quasi-standingextremely low frequency (ELF) waves that naturally exist in the earth’s‘electromagnetic’ cavity, the space between the ground and the ionosphere.And these ‘earth brainwaves’ are identical to the spectrum of our brainwaves.The Creator designed living beings to resonate to this natural frequencypulsation in order to evolve harmoniously. 5In other words, the Earth’s overarching magnetic field, or magnetosphere, encompassesnatural forces that condition life on earth; these forces include the ionosphere, lightningactivity, and other ambient electrical forces—and these energies of nature blend andcombine so as to generate a naturally occurring electromagnetic frequency in the ELFrange, concentrating around 7.8 Hz. Such “Earth-vibes” are by definition healthy andharmonious—both for the planet, and for living things. It’s no surprise that thesenaturally occurring EM waves happen to match our internal brainwaves, as the Earthitself and life on the Earth have arisen and evolved together over eons. Thesefrequencies are homeostatic—they serve to stabilize and nurture living existence in the60-mile space between the upper atmosphere and the Earth’s surface, and in the oceansbelow.All well and good, but how does one deal with these energies if you are in chargeof Project PANDORA and your goal is the weaponization of space usingelectromagnetic energy?The proximity of ambient earth-frequency waves makes it difficult to directartificial EM waves that, for example, might be aimed at a specific person, piece ofequipment, or group in a clearly defined area, such as in a battlefield situation. Theproblem is that a weaponized signal that is able to resonate with (and disturb) humanbrain waves would largely disappear against the background of the ambient frequenciesof nature and living things.Well, apparently, nothing’s too diabolical for a scientist working on acompartmentalized project under a classified defense contract. Researchers learnedearly on that they can overcome the background frequencies of the planet by creatingextremely high-frequency microwave beams that are then “amplitude modulated” atexactly the same rate as the desired brain wave. Later, Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald,9

presidential board of science advisor under President Johnson, extended this thinking,and theorized that one could modulate a signal in the ionosphere that would rebounddownward toward targets on the ground, or in the air. 6 The quest to turn the atmosphereitself into a plasma state to facilitate EM transmissions, as we show later, is a logicalextension of this concept.Decades ago, presidential policy advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote the followingabout MacDonald’s work: “Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on thebrain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a specialist inproblems of warfare, says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes couldlead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certainregions of the earth . . . in this way one could develop a system that would seriouslyimpair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over anextended period . . . No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using theenvironment to manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some, the technologypermitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades.” 7Brzezinksi was right, of course. Such capabilities have been developed, much ofit under cover of “Star Wars” funding as well as in dozens of other classified defense andintelligence programs.According to Dr. Armen Victorian and many other sources, PANDORA was astepping stone to a massive expansion of research and extensive testing of these findings,research that has been conducted ever since by the Army, Navy, Air Force and CIA,often with “non-volunteer human test-beds.” Years later, even in the face of a flood ofcourt cases brought by unwitting victims, “no liability has ever been admitted by theestablishments or their contractors,” writes Victorian. “The situation remains the sametoday . . . U.S. military interest in electromagnetics is now well established.” 8A few scientists have been open about the capabilities of controlling humanconsciousness and behavior with EM technology. One such researcher is Dr. ElizabethRauscher-Bise, who has worked at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and StanfordResearch Institute, and as a research consultant to NASA and the U.S. Navy. In 2003,Rauscher-Bise told independent journalist Joe Vialls that she had identified the specificfrequency effects needed to induce nausea, happiness, and many other behavioral statesdecades ago. “Give me the money and three months,” she boasted to Vialls, “and I'll beable to affect the behavior of 80 per cent of the people in this town without theirknowing it. Make them happy—or at least they'll think they're happy. Or aggressive.”Elizabeth Rauscher-Bise is reportedly above board with her work, havingdemonstrated the effects of various frequencies quasi-public forums. Vialls tells the storyabout “one memorable demonstration in California, [when] she turned a specific brainwave on all students in the left-side of her auditorium, whereupon their teeth startedchattering collectively and uncontrollably. When the unaffected students on the rightsideof the auditorium suggested this might be some sort of trick, Elizabeth Rauscher-Bise calmly turned the specific brain wave on them instead. The right-side now sufferedexactly the same fate, watched by the stunned, but no longer affected students on theleft-side.” 9The militarization of American neuroscienceWhile developments in brain research are touted for their amazingtherapeutic advances in the medical field, they primarily serve the purposesof the U.S. military. Americans have little idea about the research10

concerning the capabilities of electromagnetism, directed acoustics, orcomputer-human interfacing. The majority of Americans do not know thatwe are currently using these new-concept weapons in Iraq andAfghanistan. 10—Peter Phillips et al, Project CensoredDefense planners have long known that in the battlefields of the future, neuroweaponsand mind control technology will increasingly become important. A turning point wasreached when President Bush senior declared the 1990s to be “The Decade of theBrain”—perhaps his way of alerting the covert world that much more federal fundingthan ever for neuroscience defense research would pour into the Defense AdvancedResearch Projects Agency (DARPA). With the resulting infusion, more than fourdecades of clandestine support for the weaponization of brain/mind research reached itsculmination in advanced discoveries about how to create and deploy electromagneticweapons targeted at the human nervous system or much bigger targets such as theweather, plate tectonics, or entire populations. 11By 2008, Department of Defense spending on this category of technology hadreached a half of a billion dollars a year, according to former Pentagon analyst WilliamArkin, who is now with the Washington Post. 12 (Of course, this dollar estimate does notcover “black budget” programs.) Indeed, DEWs are now a routine part of the defenseestablishment: The website for a recent trade show on energy weapons held near thePentagon in Arlington, Virginia touted the show’s “unparalleled speaker faculty,” itsdozens of displays of the newest technologies, and a recent book entitled The E-Bomb,by J. Douglas Beason, states that directed energy will “revolutionize warfare.” 13That said, it may be instructive to step back for some perspective. For millennia,the weapons of warfare have been kinetic—a brute, gross affair of simply hitting theenemy with a sword, an arrow, a bullet, or a bomb. But in the future, a completely newphysical principle of hitting an adversary will be applied: energy. As noted, most of thiscomes under the military category of “non-lethal weapons,” though the lethal potentialof some energy weapons, such as HAARP, can be immense.Above-ground versions of energy weapons now used in the battlefields of Iraq,Afganistan, Israel, and elsewhere are increasingly acknowledged to exist by militaryauthorities as war reporters begin to witness the grisly results of the revolutionary changefrom kinetic weapons to energy weapons.Among the more benign approaches is “active denial technology,” whichproduces enormous pain by allegedly boiling the molecules of water in the human skinwithout damaging the skin itself. It employs pulsed electromagnetic radiation at afrequency of 95 GHz with a range of about 600 meters. The ADS weapon’s beamcauses pain within 2 to 3 seconds and becomes “intolerable after less than 5 seconds.”By contrast with the covert use of classified EM weapons on citizens andadversaries, the cases below are typical cases of the overt military use of these newweapons:Item: Exotic weapons used in the 2006 Israeli-Lebanon warOn August 7, 2006, witnesses stated that directed-energy weapons and other exotic weapons were usedrepeatedly in the Israeli-Lebanon war. One of the researchers of this event, Italian Professor Paola Maduca,requested that a United Nations international tribunal be set up to look into the charges. Professor Maducacited “countless reports from hospitals, witnesses, armament experts, and journalists that strongly suggestthat new weapons [were] used,” and pointed to the presence of “new and strange symptoms amongst the11

wounded and the dead.” These included (warning—this description is graphic): “Bodies with dead tissuesand no apparent wounds; ‘shrunken’ corpses; descriptions of extensive internal wounds with no trace ofshrapnel, corpses blackened but not burnt, and others heavily wounded that did not bleed . . . Many ofthese descriptions,” writes Maduca, “suggest the possibility that the new weapons used include ‘directenergy’ weapons, and chemical and/or biological agents, in a sort of macabre experiment of futurewarfare.” 14Item: Clandestine EM weapons deployed in Iraq neighborhoodsAccording to reliable reports, GIs faced with restive Iraqi neighborhoods were sometimes directed to installhidden transmitters that saturate areas with “pacifying” or disorienting electromagnetic frequencies. “Theidea behind microwaving Iraq’s more restive cities,” said one on-the-ground source, “is to keep them soagitated that they cannot coalesce into a full force of resistance fighters . . . The silent frequencies dailysweeping Fallujah and other trouble spots are the same Navy ‘freqs’ [frequencies] that drove whales nutsand made them go astray onto beaches.” For more targeted crowd control, less sophisticated weaponsmounted on Humvees were used to beam microwaves that flash-burn exposed flesh. 15Item at CNN.com: “Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs” Air ForceSecretary Michael Wynne stated in 2007 that “nonlethal weapons should be tested on U.S. civiliansbefore being used on the battlefield,” referring to the use of EM weapons in crowd-control situations.“The object is basically public relations,” said Wynne. “Domestic use would make it easier to avoidquestions from others about possible safety considerations.” 16Test weapons on U.S. civilians before using them on the battlefield? If an official at thislevel is ready to admit “domestic use” for testing the safety of nonlethal weapons, thenwe can be very certain that such tests are occurring, including tests of classifiedweapons.Let’s now consider the shocking evidence for the incidence of such “tests.”Domestic victims call attention to covert uses of EM weapons“There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy,its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas ofnational interest—free from all checks and balances—and free from thelaw itself.”—Daniel K. Inouye, U.S. Senator (Iran/Contra Hearings, 1986)There can be little doubt that covert operatives in and out of government have beenactively testing these devices on unsuspecting citizens, just as Air Force Chief Wynnestated. For the most part, they appear to operate free from legal scrutiny—perhaps inways that Senator Daniel K. Inouye alludes to in the above quote.The year 1975 witnessed the greatest revelation of the fact that the governmenthas actively researched political control technologies on its own citizens as test subjects.We now know that extensive Cold War-related “mind control” research took placebetween the 1950s and 1970s—and was epitomized by the CIA’s notorious, illegal MK-ULTRA program, an early attempt to narrow the gap against the Russians’ allegedsophisticated “psychotronics” research.Hearings on Project MK-ULTRA were initiated in 1975 in the U.S. Congress bythe Church Committee, and additional inquiries took place through a presidentialcommission known as the Rockefeller Commission. Investigative efforts were hamperedby the fact that CIA Director Richard Helms illegally ordered all MK-ULTRA filesdestroyed in 1973; the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission investigations12

had no choice but to rely on the sworn testimony of direct participants and on therelatively small number of documents that survived Helms’ destruction order. Thehearings revealed that over 30 universities and institutions were involved in an“extensive testing and experimentation” program which included covert drug tests onunwitting citizens “at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign.” Alltold, the program consisted of 149 projects at 80 universities and other institutionsinvolving drug testing and a variety other studies on unwitting human subjects,including numerous studies using electromagnetic technologies.But this was just one example of the aggressive and illegal use of Americans astest-beds for new weapons. In an overview piece by journalist Amy Worthington welearn the following:By 1963, 1,200 nuclear weapons tests conducted at the Nevada test sitehad exposed every person in the U.S. to deadly radioactive fallout, causingmillions of fetal deaths, spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, and birthdefects. The U.S. government also conducted over 4,000 radiationexperiments on individual human test subjects without their informedconsent. According to some researchers, the delayed effects of decades ofradiation exposure from weapons testing are today demonstrated by a U.S.population plagued with epidemic cancer and heart disease, neurologicaldisorders, low fertility, chronic fatigue, obesity (thyroid involvement),immune system dysfunction and learning disabilities. Dr. Leonard Cole’s1994 testimony before a Senate Committee regarding 45 years of open-airbiological weapons testing revealed that military aircraft had sprayedAmerican cities with bacteria, fungus and carcinogenic chemicals. 17Worthington estimated that the toll of unwitting test subjects may now be as many ashalf a million: “The Secretary of Energy under Clinton, O’Leary, warned that over a 40year period, 500,000 had been unwitting test subjects for military research on non-lethalweapons, including MK-ULTRA, which claims among many victims Ted Kaczinky, theUnabomber. There is no way to know who these people are or how to help thembecause there is paranoia in the military and no oversight in Congress. These blackprojects probably don’t even make it to the President.” 17In 2010, such programs continue apace, despite the election of a Democrat tothe White House who campaigned on transparency in government. The discovery in2005 of the NSA’s warrantless surveillance of millions of American phone calls, e-mails,Internet activity, and text messaging certainly provoked widespread alarm at our loss ofprivacy; and this apprehension was further exacerbated by the Obama administration’sastonishing attempts to uphold this practice.Constitutional lawyer Glen Grenwald explains that, “From the start, the ObamaDOJ [Department of Justice] has engaged in one extraordinary maneuver after the nextto shield this criminal surveillance program from judicial scrutiny. Indeed, theirstonewalling at one point became so extreme that the court actually threatened theObama DOJ with sanctions . . . the Obama DOJ’s ‘Bush-mimicking state secretsdefense’ has been used by them in one case after the next to conceal and shield fromjudicial review a wide range of Bush crimes—including torture, renditions andsurveillance.” 18Any alert citizen might ask: To what end, Mr. Obama?Groups such as Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS),a human rights organization based on Cincinnati, Ohio, have one answer. They claim13

that rogue elements of the government and corporations use advanced surveillancecapabilities to support the identification, tracking, and covert stalking of thousands ofprivate citizens, toward the end of “mass control of the population,” says FFCHSpresident, Derrick Robinson. Bear in mind: A person must be efficiently tracked beforethey can be effectively targeted and controlled.FFCHS’s attorney Jonathan Wilson recently addressed the Senate JudiciaryCommittee in a letter to Senator Patrick Leahy requesting a hearing and congressionalinvestigation into FFCHS’s allegations of non-consensual experimentation on Americancitizens using directed energy weapons and organized stalking. The organization statesthat these activities are perpetrated by the US military and other intelligence agencies,corporations, and teams of private citizens. (See Appendix C)In recent years, groups like FFCHS have enabled thousands of targetedindividuals (or “TIs”) to discover one another and form citizens groups. TIs have evenjoined forces globally. For the first time, a global coalition of TI organizations met onOctober 21, 2006 in hopes of ending this egregious form of human rights violation.A notable example of a TI is African-American novelist and National Book Awardwinner Gloria Naylor, whose harrowing story began in 1996 when she moved tosecluded St. Helena Island off the coast of South Carolina. A minor run-in with acantankerous neighbor whose brother worked for the National Security Agency set intomotion a series of events that made Naylor the object of surveillance. The fictionalizedaccount of the true story of her subsequent ordeal appears in the book entitled 1996.“The intensely private Naylor soon found herself in the company of other prominentblack writers and activists targeted by the government with electronic harassment,”explains the flap of the book. “She was harassed until she feared for her sanity andconsulted a psychiatrist. When she discovered that her tormentors were using mindcontroltechniques, she fought back with the only weapon she had—her writing talent.”Naylor was among those participating in an international event co-organized byFFCHS that was known as the “World Day to End the Silent Holocaust.” In this historicgathering held in 2006, scientists, former intelligence officers, legal experts, publishedauthors, and others from eight countries launched an international coalition tostrengthen awareness about the hidden crime wave involving electronic harassment andmind control, and to press for investigations and government enquiries. The sponsors ofthe conference were (as stated) Freedom From Covert Harassment and an Australianhuman rights organization called Duprevent International.Aside from Naylor, speakers included Dr. Robert Duncan, Ph.D. (artificialintelligence expert from Harvard University and former defense scientist), who washimself once a targeted individual, and Dr. Nick Begich, author of Angels Don’t PlayThis HAARP (whose work is covered below). Representatives from Australia, Canada, theNetherlands, the United States, Belgium, Austria, England and India attended,indicating that this criminal activity is more widespread than most realize.At the event, human rights activist and event co-organizer Deborah Dupre statedthat common targets include whistleblowers and peace workers. Dupre estimated “aminimum of two million innocent citizens globally are presently tortured in-home and[in their] community” by electronic stalking and related crimes. She cited for examplethe findings of the Toronto Rape Crisis Center, which recorded numerous cases ofclients, especially single women, who are apparently being targeted. These womenpresented consistent stories and physical symptoms “attributable to microwave weaponsassaults on them.”More recently, on April 16, 2010, FFCHS—in alliance with Ms. Connie Marshall,14

candidate for mayor of Louisville, Kentucky—convened a press conference in Louisvilleto call attention to a new wave of organized stalking and electronic torture. Thepresenters charged that the perpetrators of these crimes range from rogue elements ofevery level of government to corporations and even private citizens with access to thetechnology. Speakers included a Missouri statehouse representative, a mechanicalengineer, a commercial airline pilot, and a candidate for mayor of Louisville, Kentucky.Unable to attend was Dr. John Hall, an anesthesiologist and author of an importantnew book on this phenomenon entitled A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America.According to Hall, “Our government satellite surveillance systems are a new way forcriminals to gain possession not only of our financial lives, but our most preciousresource: our minds.” Hall is planning a conference on electronic harrassment later in2010 in Oakland, California.Electronic Harassment of Activists and Dissidents“The Department of Homeland Security's surveillance apparatus is certainly aimedat prosecuting the war on terror. But it may also be aimed at us, for domesticpolitical purposes.”—Naomi Wolf, The End of America (2007)Covert use of energy and mind control weapons against activists in domestic populationsis the main focus in this essay—that is, the deployment of such weapons as “politicalcontrol technology”—and the examples are many. Here are just a few that suggest thewide range of victims and techniques of attack:Item: Zapping of UK anti-nuke activists in 1985 investigated by UK ParliamentIn late 1985, the women living in the anti-nuke peace camps at Greenham Common began to experience unusualpatterns of illness, ranging from severe headaches, drowsiness, menstrual bleeding after the onset of menopause, tobouts of temporary paralysis and faulty speech coordination. An Electronics Today (Dec.1985) report concluded:“Readings taken with a wide range of signal strength meters showed marked increases in the background signal levelnear one of the women’s camps at a time when they claimed to be experiencing ill effects.” Since then, hearingshave been held by the British and European Parliaments.Item: Renowned UFO researcher suffers repeated attacks by EM weaponsPerhaps the nation’s leading UFO disclosure advocate, emergency physician Steven Greer, MD, founderand director of the Disclosure Project, revealed that he has frequently been a victim of electronicharassment by opponents in what he calls the “Shadow Government.” In his 2006 book, Hidden Truth–Forbidden Knowledge, he writes: “Every night at 4:20am, as I was sleeping in my bedroom at home, therewould be an almost sub-audible click, and I would be hit by an electronic weapons system. I would becomeviolently ill and so sick that would get up and be nauseated, vomiting, with diarrhea, diaphoretic. Thebathroom would be literally soaked with sweat, because I had almost no blood pressure, and I wouldcollapse on the floor of the bedroom, near death. This happened to me night after night, day after day. Itwas horrifying. It lasted for only 10 to 15 minutes. I know that this rogue group was trying to make me stopwhat I was doing—but I refused to stop.” Greer claimed the ability to remote view his victimizers,witnessing a group sitting at an electronic control panel that was operating psychotronic equipment at anunderground facility. “And then I saw them seeing me. They had such a look of shame in their eyes. Theylooked away, and it all ended. After this, they stopped the nighttime attacks.” Greer also said a prayer askingGod to forgive them, sending them a blessing. 20A remarkable article in Harper’s magazine in late 2009 cites the likely reason for the15

acceleration of the use of EM weapons on activists: What is now under way, statedjournalist Ando Arike ominously, is “what appears to be the first arms race in which theopponent is the general population.”To explain the advent of “soft” weapons (today’s nonlethal arsenal that includesenergy weapons), Arike briefly cites the lessons learned by ruling elites from the modernhistory of escalating conflicts between police and demonstrators. Beginning with anumber of disturbing street clashes during the civil rights era in the fifties, the problemreached a new level of intensity with the “police riots” at the Democratic PartyConvention in Chicago in 1968 and the shootings of students and activists at Kent Stateand elsewhere in anti-Vietnam War demonstrations. After a hiatus in which each sidehoned its strategies and tools of confrontation, a major turning point was marked by thefierce and highly successful anti-globalization demonstrations that famously shut down aWorld Trade Organization ministerial meeting in Seattle in 1999.At each turn, authorities increasingly learned a hard lesson: Cops may have theirguns, truncheons, tear gas, water canons, jails, wiretaps, and they may plant spies andclever provocateurs at mass rallies, but dissidents and demonstrators also wield powerfulweapons in the form of TV cameras and public opinion—the ability of electronic mediato galvanize increased resentment and create a legitimacy crisis for rulers, especiallywhen graphic images of the cruelty of state power flash across television or computerscreens.None of this concern is completely new, of course; controlling volatile mobs hasalways been worrisome for elites throughout history, especially since those days in 1792when overwhelming crowds of enraged Parisians toppled King Louis XVI to initiate themost radical wave of the French Revolution. But Arike explains how far this concern hasevolved over two centuries: “The ultimate goal, it seems, is to fight ‘Military Operationson Urban Terrain’ (MOUT), using weapons with a rheostatic [i.e., scalable] capabilitythat, like Star Trek’s ‘phasers,’ will allow military commanders to fine-tune the amountand type of force used in a given situation, and thereby to control opponents’ behaviorwith scientific precision.”After their relative success in Seattle, protesters targeted economic summits inrapid succession, swarming meetings of the World Economic Forum, the G8, and othergatherings in a dozen major cities. But without Seattle’s advantage of surprise, they facedincreasingly elaborate MOUT tactics. The July 2001 G8 summit in Genoa was aconflagration, with 100,000 protesters confronting 15,000 police and troops on streetslocked down under a terrorism red alert, leading to one death and hundreds of injuriesin street fighting. 21The next big demonstration was planned for the September 2001 World Banksummit in Washington, D.C., but organizers wisely backed away after the attacks on theWorld Trade Center and the Pentagon.“With the launch of the Global War on Terror, ‘the gloves were off,’ as theWhite House put it: authorities had free rein to target protesters as potential terrorists,”writes Arike. Domestic “anti-terrorism” legislation would now increasingly target theAmerican population itself, not just the alleged overseas terrorists. This began with theUSA Patriot Act, and was extended by the Military Commissions Act of 2006, whichgrants the president the power to identify American citizens as “unlawful enemycombatants” and detain them indefinitely without charge, as well as permitting secrettrials for citizens. Then, in 2007, the White House quietly issued National SecurityPresidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure “continuity of government” in the event16

of what the directive vaguely calls a “catastrophic emergency.” If the presidentdetermines that such an emergency has occurred, he may cancel elections, suspendthe Constitution, and declare martial law, all without Congressional review. Note well:President Obama has not rescinded Directive 51.As deteriorating economic conditions in the United States took a sharp turn forthe worse in September 2008, the Army Times reported that the 3rd Infantry Division’s1st Brigade Combat Team was being redeployed from Iraq to the “homeland” with whatone colonel called the “first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded . . .referring to crowd and traffic control equipment and nonlethal weapons designed tosubdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.” 22An “overt” energy weapon called the LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) didget deployed in Pittsburgh during the time of the G20 summit on September 24-25th,2009, as one facet of an incredible show of police brutality. Security forces turned itspiercing sound on demonstrators causing widespread outrage—the first time the “soundcannon” had been used publicly. Close to $1 billion was used for security purposes atthe 2010 summit of the G20 in Toronto, but it is not known whether new weapons weredeployed.The Soviet Origins of PsychotronicsA psychotronic generator can influence an individual, or a wholecrowd of people. It can affect a person’s psyche mentally oremotionally. It can affect memory and attention span. Apsychotronic device can cause physical fatigue, disorientation, andalter a person's behaviour.—Professor Edward Naumov, leading Russian parapsychologistWe noted how U.S. research into political control technology was forced out into theopen for a brief and embarrassing moment in the mid-1970s, after which thegovernment evidently withdrew behind a wall of denials while it expanded its classifiedresearch programs.But the world got a much closer look at these diverse weapons systems after thecollapse of the Soviet Union. By the mid-1990s, the new Russian government wasforced to admit to the existence of advanced mind control weapons as hundreds ofvictims of experiments came forward to present cases of abuse to the Russiangovernment, the Duma, and Soviet press. For a time, prior to the rise of Putin, the mostsensitive KGB files were opened to the amazement of Western researchers. SovietCold War technology secrets were now disgorged and even offered up for sale to thehighest bidder. The story of Russian psychotronics may offer us a much better look atthe phenomenon than we might ever get from the U.S. side.The research began soon after the death of Stalin in 1953, when the Marxistmaterialisttaboo on researching the “paranormal” had began to fade. A key source onthe history of Russian mind control research since then is Tim Rifat, a leading Britishscientific expert on the paranormal and inventor in his own right of a commercialpsychotronic generator for nonmilitary uses.By the early 1960s, he states, the KGB and other Soviet agencies had launchedthe scientific exploration of the weapons potential of psychic energy. “Groups ofscientists at many research institutes,” he writes, “began to investigate and later harness17

psychic energy. The aim of this research was to produce deadly new exotic weaponsthat could tip the balance of power during the cold war. Yuri Andropov, head of theKGB from 1967 to 1982, who later became the Premier of the USSR, issued thecommand to implement a paranormal warfare programme in order to develop a newform of strategic weapon systems that could augment nuclear weapons.”Initially, says Rifat, they researched methods of psychic spying on US militaryinstallations and even on NATO commanders themselves—what we in the West nowcall RV (remote viewing). In time, the Soviets became masters at literally scanning and“reading the minds” of their opponents in the West.Training psychics was a key activity, but in time “augmentation technology”became critical. A key inside source on this cold war activity was Dr. A.V. Kalinets-Bryukhanov (now president of the All Union Scientific Research Association) who hasrevealed how research was extended into technologies for artificially stimulating RV.States Rifat: “It was found that natural clairvoyants changed the magnetic field aroundthem and that of the Earth in their immediate vicinity. [The new research] showed tothe Russians that RV was a field phenomenon dependent on magnetic and even moreesoteric fields unknown to western science.”Working with the earlier research of Semyon Davidovich Kirlian (discoverer ofthe famous “Kirlian aura”), it wasn’t long before Soviet discovered that something moreinclusive—“biophysical energy”—was the responsible for field effect behind RV,telepathy, telekinesis, and other paranormal phenomena.It was found that the biophysical field of the remote viewer flared out whenhe or she was lowered into the theta state. At the Schumann resonance pointof 7.8 Hz, the Earth's natural frequency, the human biophysical field seemedto merge with its surroundings and vanish for a split second. When it cameback into being, it was many times larger than normal. While [in] RV, thisbiophysical field seemed to grow smaller, as if part of it was at the placebeing remotely viewed. On familiar territory, the Russians discovered thatRV was just a symptom of Out of Body Experience (OOBE) caused bybiophysical translocation. In simple language, the biophysical body movedto the distant location, picked up information, then returned to the physicalbody to transfer this information to the brain. With Kirlian-type scanners, theRussians found that RV was a biophysical phenomena. If the biophysicalfields could be controlled, not only RV was possible, but the telepathicknockout, the ability to render the person you were remotely viewingunconscious by psychic means.Thus began what Rifat calls “…the inner space arms race . . . Inner spaceweapon systems had the potential to kill or drive mad entire populations by meansof biophysical and electronic technology unknown to the West in the 1970s.”Biophysical warfare in fact became second only to nuclear warfare in the Sovietstrategic arsenal.Through a number of steps of research (some which drew from research byWilhelm Reich, a student of Freud’s, and even from ancient alchemical texts), Sovietsnext discovered that “psychotronic generators” could store biophysical energy, afterbeing charged by a number of techniques, including human touch and “gaze,” andeven animals and plants. Russian remote viewers could now link themselves to psychicamplifiers “that boosted their paranormal powers to near miraculous heights . . .Psychotronically boosted Russian remote viewers were found to be capable of18

enhancing the telepathic knockout, refined versions of which are now called remoteinfluencing.”Rihat’s reference in this passage to telepathic knockout, of course, refers tomachine-enhanced psychic attacks.An entirely new level of research led the Soviets to think much bigger. By the1980’s—long before the U.S. erected HAARP—the Soviets had build the world’s largesttransmitter (actually, seven massive transmitters assembled near Kiev), later code-named“Woodpecker” by U.S. intelligence. Why Woodpecker? Because it’s beam soundedlike a woodpecker due to loud ELF (i.e., electromagnetic low frequency) modulationsin the signal when the signal was intercepted in the West on radio receivers.Ominously, Woodpecker’s task was to beam mind control waves at the West, poweredby the Chernobyl nuclear power complex in the Ukraine!According to Rifat, the Soviets beamed Woodpecker’s emissions in the directionof Western Europe, Australia, North America and the Middle East. “These emissionspermeated all obstacles and were conducted into homes via the power lines of eachnation’s national grid.” The Soviets had discovered that ELF waves could penetrate theskull and change brain patterns when broadcast at test victims. Waves at 6.66Hz makesthe victim depressed; 11Hz can make a person manic and prone to riotous behaviour.These finding were later corroborated in the West. The KGB had studied the brainwavemaps of pathological criminals and depressed mental patients in an effort to “remapthe neural networks in the brains of the entire western population . . . Woodpecker’s10Hz ELF signal went on until the fall of the Soviet Union.” 23A Not So Heavenly HAARPThese new weapons are unlike anything ever contemplated by mankind.These are systems that pierce the very integrity of the human being.—Dr. Nick BegichBut the Soviets had no monopoly on large installations capable of emitting massive ELFmodulations into the atmosphere. The U.S. had its own grandiose plans, though wecame a bit late to the table.In 1990, the U.S. military initiated the construction of the High-frequency ActiveAuroral Research Program (HAARP), in Gakona, Alaska—originally a component ofPresident Ronald Reagan’s so-called Strategic Defense Initiative or “Star Wars,” and soldto Congress as a tool for military communications. Very little was known to the publicabout HAARP until the mid-1990s when alarmed activists based in Alaska—notably Dr.Nick Begich, the son of a U.S. Congressman—began independent research into theclassified aspects of the HAARP program.It is now known that HAARP antennas project powerful pulses that literally heat aspecific point in the Earth’s ionosphere. Generally speaking, HAARP’s effect on theionosphere causes “steerable,” controllable, electromagnetic frequencies to bounceback to earth at desired locations.The so-called HAARP antenna array is massive, much bigger than the Soviet’sWoodpecker installation; it consists of 180 antennas arrayed in a grid pattern over a 35acre area, with a total power output capability 3.6 billion watts. As the largest ionosphericheater in the world, it is capable of heating a 1000 square kilometer area of the19

ionosphere to over 50,000 degrees. In regard to weather modification, HAARP’s heatingeffect literally lifts the ionosphere (within a 30 mile diameter area), thereby changinglocalized pressure systems or even altering the route of jet streams.Other “overt” applications now admitted by the military make it easy to infer justhow versatile and powerful HAARP would be as an electromagnetic weapon. These nowinclude: improved communication with submarines using ELF waves; over-the-horizonradar communications; the ability to wipe out an enemy’s communications in a largearea; and earth-penetrating tomography which can be used to verify compliance withpeace agreements or geophysical probing to find oil or mineral deposits.The use of HAARP frequencies for black-budget applications such as generatingcatastrophic earthquakes and weather warfare applications—both with politicalobjectives—are widely discussed and reasonably well documented. 24 The covertapplications of HAARP that concern us here are its use on humans in nonlethal warfare,and research by Dr. Begich and writing partner Jean Manning uncovered sufficientevidence of such an intent to cause alarm. This typical quote is excerpted from aninternal U.S. Air Force document:The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are widerangingand can be used in many military or quasi-military situations . . .Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowdcontrol, controlling breaches of security at military installations, andantipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM(electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severephysiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. Inaddition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such apoint that they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage ofelectromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areaswith a single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may bedifficult to develop. 25This passage describes possible HAARP effects on groups in battlefield situations. Thedescriptions unearthed by Begich and others suggest that, much like a satellite systembroadcasting a TV signal to a city, the energetic “footprint” of a HAARP signal could beprogrammed so that it spreads out over and blankets a region with a disruptivefrequency—for example, in order to target a hapless enemy city such as Fallujah duringthe Iraq war.If so, how then would a HAARP transmission be discretely targeted at a singleindividual or group of individuals? An anonymous physicist who has researched thetechnology of HAARP told me: “Within a blanket HAARP transmission, specific signalscan be keyed in that interact with individual human biocrystals. In other words, somediscrete portion of a HAARP signal to a particular region of the earth can be ‘tuned’ to atargeted individual’s ‘bio-signature.’ Wherever you are within that footprint, your uniquebioenergetic signature would attract that very specific targeted signal like a tuning fork,through a ‘field resonance’ effect. That’s the frequency with your name on it.” Thephysicist compared this technique to a TV satellite carrying 500 channels beamed at alarge metropolitan area. Each of these channels, he said, is ‘individually targeted’ andwould be picked up by any receiving television within the satellite’s footprint tuned tothat discrete channel.Obviously, covert energy attacks on individuals could also be sent via actualsatellites, but the physicist considered that approach to be “old tech.” Even HAARP is20

moving toward old-tech status these days, he added, for, more advanced “quantum”technologies are now being tested.This account of HAARP may sound like science fiction, but we are going to haveto stretch ourselves even more if we are to get to the bottom of the hidden new weaponsystems. Let’s now examine an allied weapon system, one closely related to HAARP—and one that’s yet another massive government project that is shrowded in even deepersecrecy. It is, of course, the strange and disturbing phenomenon known colloquially aschemtrails—and it’s all covert.Aerosol Madness Above the EarthEarly in 1999, Senator Joseph Lieberman wrote an unusual letter to EPA head CarolBrowner. He wanted her to address constituent concerns “about the possible release oftoxic chemical substances from jet contrails” and “reports of toxic spraying overpopulated areas in 41 states.” Lieberman also noted “recent outbreaks of flu-likesymptoms and other sicknesses in Connecticut and other states that may possibly belinked to jet fuel exhaust fumes.”However, the EPA did not reply to this influential U.S. Senator—thus setting thetone for the egregious cover up and systematic stonewalling of this “toxic aerial spraying”issue, now a mainstay of American underground folklore.Soon after, of the first journalists to expose the issue, William Thomas, appearedon Art Bell’s “Coast to Coast” radio show with breaking news of a new phenomenon hecalls “chemtrails.”Thomas pointed to numerous disturbing reports nationwide. For example, ThePhiladelphia Daily News stated that “a wave of respiratory illnesses [had] swept the area.”A man in Eugene reports that, “my wife and I saw some rainbow-colored cloudsyesterday. We are calling them ‘chem-clouds.’” Observers in Spokane counted 33chemtrails in two and half hours. An Arizona resident reported that after heavy aerialspraying activity, “The doctor's offices and hospitals were totally packed the next week,and one of the nurses I spoke to said they didn't know what was wrong with everyone.”Robert Page, director of a County Health Department in upstate New York, tellsreporters, “We know there's a lot of sickness, but our diagnosis shows that it’s not theflu.”Thomas soon submitted the first chemtrails story ever issued over the wireservices. The piece entitled “Mystery Contrails May Be Modifying Weather” offers thehypothesis that U.S. Air Force aerial tankers may be seeding clouds to modify theweather. He also cited reports by researchers that “angel hair” is being sprayed by themystery aircraft and is being recovered on the ground. Thomas has continued hiscourageous journalistic coverage of the issue ever since. 26Now enter Clifford Carnicom, an amateur New Mexico scientist and selfemployedprofessional computer consultant—and unsung American hero. Anotherpioneer of chemtrails investigation, today Carnicom is the arguably its most veteranresearcher. More recently he is founder of the Carnicom Institute in Santa Fe, NewMexico.After witnessing weeks of massive aerial spraying over his region in New Mexico,Carnicom was moved to initiate an independent, one-man, self-funded, part-timeresearch outfit focused on the mystery. But Carnicom is rigorous and relentless bynature. Over many years, and increasingly in collaboration with citizen-researchers all21

over the world, he has identified and pursued numerous areas of empirical research,with strong technical emphasis into what he prefers to call covert aerosol operations, oraerosol crimes.These include: environmental modification (including weather control),electromagnetic operations that include the use of HAARP and cell towers, militaryweapons, and global surveillance. More recently, he has focused on “biologicaloperations,” resulting in extremely important observations that are beyond the scope ofthis article. (In addition to the spraying of heavy metals, Carnicom and many others havedocumented the very bizarre presence in the aerosols of biological pathogens, “nanofibers,”and polymers.)Clifford Carnicom had previously worked for fifteen years with variousgovernment agencies, including the Department of Defense, the Forest Service, andthe Bureau of Land Management. Over the eleven years that he has studied thephenomenon, he has produced crucial findings that are germane to our topic of mindcontrol and EM weapons. Carnicom has produced reliable data based on careful, welldocumentscientific measurements that lead to the following set of observations:• The pervasive presence in the atmosphere of “ionizable metallic salts”(including barium, aluminum, calcium, and magnesium); thesesubstances are chosen because they are easily ionized by the sun’sultraviolet light, leading to the production of high levels of positive ions.• By virtue of this aerosol process, Carnicom has documented thegradual but radical alteration of the planet’s atmosphere to create aplasma gas or plasma state. In a plasma, a certain portion of the gaseousparticles are ionized, making it a distinct state of matter with propertiesunlike those of solids, liquids, or gases.• Because the Earth’s atmosphere is not inherently conductive ofelectromagnetic waves (i.e., it contains no electrons to carry the waves),the use of chemtrails to render it into a plasma gas was necessary toenable such activity as HAARP transmissions, as well as many otherclassified military or “star wars” applications related to the weaponizationof space.• The plasma state of the atmosphere also permits the use of HAARP inaltering the magnetic field of the earth, permitting very advancedapplications in weather control and the alteration of the tectonic activityof the earth’s crust.• Among the direct mind-control applications that may be inferred,Carnicom has documented ambient extremely low electromagneticfrequencies (ELF) waves that are pulsing as multiples of 4 Hertz (12, 16,20, 24 cycles/sec). As we have noted, these are frequencies that arewell-known to profoundly affect mental functioning (as well as humancellular and immunological function). “Large amounts of energy arebeing directed into the magnetic field of the earth by the HAARPfacility. This energy is being directed along the earth’s magnetic fieldlines to you. It surrounds you and you have no simple means (at least22

not yet) to evade it. This energy is, in part, as stated within the HAARPliterature, within the ELF portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.This ELF radiation, although innocuously claimed to servecommunication purposes and the like, DOES have an effect uponbiological systems . . . The role of a modified atmosphere (refer toprevious discussions on the plasma frequency) resulting from theintroduction of massive amounts of electrically conductive particulatematter must be considered in conjunction with these disturbingfindings.” 27Well, is Carnicom on to something? Or was he just another obscure, independent,eccentric conspiracy researcher posting bizarre findings on a forgettable internet site?I believe Carnicom’s work is now fully exonerated. Hundreds of citizenresearchers(and a growing coterie of anonymous academics, meteorologists,mainstream journalists, and whisteblowers) agree that we are now in the eleventh year ofconspicuous aerosol operations, documented by thousands of photos on the internet andhundreds of empirical observations of aerosol spraying in hundreds of locations indozens of countries. [See Thomas’s list in Appendix D.] Daily, thousands of exasperatedcitizens worldwide watch the surreal display in astonishment as unmarked militarytankers discolor the skies with chemicals that morph into synthetic clouds.Because of Carnicom’s abiding presence in this field of study, he has becomethe nexus for many other revelations that confirm the direction of his empirical work.For just one example among very many, Carnicom early on received this astonishing“Airline Manager’s Statement,” which refers to aerosol operations as “OperationCloverleaf.”“Mr. Carnicom: I read the email you received from the anonymousmechanic and felt compelled to respond to it. I, too, work for an airline,though I work in upper management levels. I will not say which airline, whatcity I am located, nor what office I work for, for obvious reasons. I wish Icould document everything I am about to relate to you, but to do so is nextto impossible and would result in possible physical harm to me. The emailfrom the anonymous mechanic rings true. Airline companies in Americahave been participating in something called Project Cloverleaf for a few yearsnow. The earliest date anyone remembers being briefed on it is 1998. I wasbriefed on it in 1999. The few airline employees who were briefed on ProjectCloverleaf were all made to undergo background checks, and before we werebriefed on it we were made to sign non-disclosure agreements, whichbasically state that if we tell anyone what we know we could be imprisoned.About twenty employees in our office were briefed along with my by twoofficials from some government agency. They didn't tell us which one. Theytold us that the government was going to pay our airline, along with others,to release special chemicals from commercial aircraft. When asked what thechemicals were and why we were going to spray them, they told us thatinformation was given on a need-to-know basis and we weren't cleared for it.They then went on to state that the chemicals were harmless, but theprogram was of such importance that it needed to be done at all costs. Whenwe asked them why didn’t they just rig military aircraft to spray thesechemicals, they stated that there weren’t enough military aircraft available torelease chemicals on such a large basis as needs to be done. That’s whyProject Cloverleaf was initiated, to allow commercial airlines to assist inreleasing these chemicals into the atmosphere. Then someone asked why all23

the secrecy was needed. The government reps then stated that if the generalpublic knew that the aircraft they were flying on were releasing chemicalsinto the air, environmentalist groups would raise hell and demand thespraying stop. Someone asked one of the G-men then if the chemicals areharmless, why not tell the public what the chemicals are and why we arespraying them? He seemed perturbed at this question and told us in a tone ofauthority that the public doesn’t need to know what's going on, but that thisprogram is in their best interests. He also stated that we should not tellanyone, nor ask any more questions about it. With that, the briefing wasover. All documents in our office pertaining to Project Cloverleaf are kept inlocked safes. Nobody is allowed to take these documents out of the office.Very few employees are allowed access to these documents, and they remaintight-lipped about what the documents say. Mr. Carnicom, I am no fool. Iknow there’s something going on. And frankly, I am scared. I feel a high levelof guilt that I have been aware of this kind of operation but unable to tellanyone. It’s been eating away at me, knowing that the company I work formay be poisoning the American people. I hope this letter will open someeyes to what’s happening. Again, I wish I could give you documentedinformation, but you have to understand why I must remain totallyanonymous.” 28Another confirmation that Carnicom was penetrating a monumental story wasthe list of visitors to his website—even in the first few years of his work. He had begunthe work in 1999, and by late 2000, these intelligence, military, and defense contractorshad visited Carnicom.com: Lockheed Martin, Los Alamos National Laboratory,Raytheon Defense Systems, Boeing Aircraft, Federal Aviation Administration, NASALangley Research Center, United States EPA, USAF Headquarters (Pentagon), U.S.Department of the Treasury, Andrews Air Force Base, U.S. Naval Research Center,Honeywell, and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. [A more complete list can be found inAppendix E.]Meanwhile, the stonewall continued, especially from agencies in charge of ouratmosphere, such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Carnicomand citizen researchers long ago learned that all chemtrail questions addressed to NOAAthe are directed to a spokesperson who simply replies that she “can't comment” onchemtrails.At some point, the U.S. Air Force—a frequent visitor to Carnicom.com—realizedit had to do something to quell the citizen outcry. On the hot seat, they issued a publicinformation paper in November, 2001. Predictably, they called chemtrails a “hoax” thatwas perpetrated by people confused over contrails. “The ‘Chemtrail’ hoax has beeninvestigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientificorganizations, and major media publications,” the statement claims.”Was this, presumably, the official answer to Senator Joseph Lieberman?Now it would take a much more courageous Congressperson with the backboneto take on all the weapons we have examined here: the shadowy world of chemtrails, thecovert applications of HAARP, and electromagnetic weapons—all under the rubric ofthe weaponization of space.Next up was Congressman Dennis Kucinich, armed with his “SpacePreservation Act of 2001,” originally introduced in the House as HR 2977.24

Legislation to end the menace of exotic weapons, HAARP, chemtrailsThe recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of allmembers of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in theworld.— The Universal Declaration of Human RightsKucinich’s original bill included this startling language: “The term ‘exotic weaponssystems’ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as theionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with thepurpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earthor in space.”HR 2977 also listed the following technologies by name as weapons systems thatwould be prohibited or controlled by the measure:(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;(ii) chemtrails;(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;(v) laser weapons systems;(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.In one fell swoop, and by virtue of the text of this bill, controversial terms like“chemtrails,” “electromagnetic weapons,” and “psychotronics” had now gainedcurrency and official notice. HR 2977 was and is celebrated by a wide range of citizenactivists as a major breakthrough. It is also well worth noting that the bill was introducedjust a month after the events September 11, 2001.A somewhat diluted and revised version of this bill (HR 3616) was introducedearly in 2002 and excluded mention of such exotic weapons—and, of course, Congressdid not act on Kucinich’s initiative in any case. (The original bill no doubt received anunfavorable review from the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies.) Butthe issue had now received unprecedented credibility, offering new hope to victims andactivists.And with this we have now come full circle. For, one of the behind-the-scenesarchitects of the Kucinich bills was Alfred Webre, the once-insider with the CarterWhite House who appears at the top of this article as one of the first, significant, anddocumented citizen-victims of a “space weapon.” Along with Dr. Carol Rosin, Webrefounded the Institute for Cooperation in Space (ICIS) in 2001 to educate decisionmakersand the grassroots about why it is important to ban space weapons. With the helpof Congressman Dennis Kucinich, another new rendition, the Space Preservation Act(HR 3657), was later introduced to Congress on January 23, 2002.ICIS continues to lobby for a Space Preservation Treaty conference where worldleaders would gather to ban all varieties of space weapons. The ICIS board is made up ofprominent individuals such as former astronauts Edgar Mitchell and Brian O’Leary,author Arthur C. Clarke, famed Christic Institute attorney Daniel Sheehan, and JohnMcConnell, the founder of International Earth Day.25

Still, the weaponization of space obviously continues, and now is the time torevisit the sort of legislation pioneered by Kucinish, Webre, and Rosin.We have also come full circle with respect to the 9/11 movement. For, theoriginal 9/11 truth activists—despite all manner of suppression, harrassment, anddisinformation—have gone on to create one of the most impressive and successfulgrassroots movements in modern times.It should be pointed out that a bit of legislative progress has been made in recentyears on the issue of EM weapons. For the first time in the U.S., a sitting governmentbody has passed a law that recognizes that electromagnetic devices can be used asdestructive weapons against citizens. The state of Michigan passed such a law (MichiganPublic Law 256 2003) that went into effect in its Penal Code effective January 1, 2004. Itcriminalises such unlawful purposes as intending to actually harm or imitate suchintention in order to frighten, terrorise, intimidate, harass, injure or kill any person withsuch weapons, along with severe prison sentences.In addition, thanks in part to testimony before the European Union parliament byHAARP activist Dr. Nick Begich, the EU passed a resolution banning the use ofweapons “that can manipulate a person.” (See Parliament Resolution A4-005/99 entitled“Resolution on the Environment, Security, and Foreign Policy” passed on January 29,1999). According to Begich, during the hearings, the U.S. and NATO representatives tothe EU “sat in the back and declined to participate when asked.” 29Today, neurotechnology, psychotronics, and the impact of electromagneticenergy on consciousness and human health may appear to be the captive of today’s antidemocratic,materialistic, warlike, profit-driven culture. But the hubris of the scientistsand their secret-government sponsors who pursue this course will soon be seen tomerely represent one passing phase in the evolution of consciousness. Indeed, we canpredict that the mechanistic materialism at the heart of today’s model of neuroscience—and the value system that permits scientists to create invisible weapons based on thismodel for the purposes of secretly and silently disabling “enemies”—will soon be seen aspuerile and altogether unworthy of an advancing order of society.Wisdom and mature life experience both point to certain irreducible elements ofwhat it means to be human: These include the free-will desire to love and serve, and theexperience of the urge to evolve the soul, know the truth, and become truly free. Suchinsights will one day become lingua franca for enlightened neuroscientists who willeschew all efforts to weaponize their work.But in the final analysis, the solution requires that we resort to the rule of law; theperpetrators of human rights crimes linked to the weapons covered in this piece mustand will be prosecuted. Beyond that, citizen awareness and democratic oversight at thenational and global level will be crucial, and an understanding of the spiritual context ofall human evolution will as always remain indispensable.The Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been a guide for internationallaw for most of six decades, and as such binds the United States to its general principles.Article 5 specifically prohibits torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment. Global action on this basis may prove crucial to making a transition to aworld beyond the “covert war from within” on innocent populations.And yet ironically there’s a big “upside”—the ability of science to support theenhancement of human potentials by adapting technologies reviewed in this essay topeaceful uses. This opportunity alone contains the seeds for liberating us from very26

dangers we have noted in this paper.This White Paper was funded by Voice of the Environment(voiceoftheenvironment.org).The author, Byron Belitsos, is a publisher, journalist, and author. Belitsos isalso the principal author of One World Democracy: A Progressive Vision forEnforceable Global Law (Origin Press: 2005). In 2009 he coauthored andpublished A Return to Healing: Radical Health Care Reform and the Future ofMedicine, winner of the Gold Prize from the Nautilus Awards for “Best HealthBook of 2009.” His forthcoming book is Radical Wisdom: A Cheerful Guide to thePost-modern Apocalypse. See http://radwisdom.com/27

Appendix AA Quick Primer on Brain WaivesBrain waves are generated individual brain cells called neurons, which communicatewith each other by electrical changes that manifest in the form of brain waves as shownin an EEG (electroencephalogram).Brain waves are measured in cycles per second (Hertz; Hz is the short form). We alsotalk about the "frequency" of brain wave activity.The lower the number of Hz, the slower the brain activity or the slower thefrequency of the activity.Researchers in the 1930's and 40's identified several different types of brain waves.Traditionally, these fall into 4 types:- Delta waves (below 4 hz) occur during sleep- Theta waves (4-7 hz) are associated with sleep, deep relaxation (like hypnoticrelaxation), and visualization- Alpha waves (8-13 hz) occur when we are relaxed and calm- Beta waves (13-38 hz) occur when we are actively thinking, problem-solving, etc.28

Appendix BTestimony of an EM Attack on a 9/11 activistBy J.M, former executive director of 911truth.orgDate of incident: February to June 2005 / Testimony written late 2005“Usually, I could discern the general start time and stop time of an attack. Initially, thetypical attack started with a pain at the base of head, basically the brain stem. Then itwould shoot up into the head and envelope the whole head.“Then, basically, I became unable to think or even communicate. I had a case ofcomplete lethargy. I felt that I just needed to lay down. I was too tired to even hold upmy upper body from my rib cage, or even to stand up straight.“Once I was able to clear the negative energy with the help of a psychic healer, Irealized that there was a three-day cycle of attacks; later it changed to a two-day cyclewhile I was working with him. When the attacks were happening, they nearly alwaysseemed to start around 11 or 11:30 am and then, at about 3 pm, they would let up. Iwould suddenly realize that I can pay attention, my demeanor is happier—none of theutter despair. I was able breathe freely again.“At one point there was a five-day pause, and it seems as if the healer hadsomehow stopped them from hitting me. But then a really bad one of an entirely newtype hit me, after which it then went to a two-day cycle once again. Then at one point Iwent to a ‘shutting down’ and where there are no particular events—at least I could notdiscern them. I can tell you that there were a lot of times when I was working along andjust went into what I call a ‘deep freeze’—I just shut down. I would find myself bentforward, mouth open, in kind of a non-thinking stupor.“But one attack was different from the others: I definitely felt like it was a heartattack. I had heart palpitations, pounding and racing pulse, and I had difficulty breathing,as if my throat was constricting—that was the day I called the healer and said: ‘I think Iam dying’ That was a definite event. He soon called back. He said that we should waituntil the evening when the attack was over, because if he cleared me while the eventwas still happening it would still continue. Then, like the other attacks, it stopped rightabout 3:15. The energy just changed and it was over, but the symptoms were still thereand I just had to wait for the healer to call me that evening. During the attack, I was soafraid, though, with my throat closing and all the rest of it, I almost thought I should goto the hospital. You know, I have never had anxiety attacks or panic attacks and the like.I started checking in: Am I anxious, am I feeling stressed about anything? No, I wasn’t,not aside from the sense of this mysterious, extremely frightening thing that washappening to me.”29

March 31, 2008Sen. Patrick Leahy433 Russell Senate Office BldgUnited States SenateWashington, DC 20510Dear Senator:Appendix CWILSON LAW CENTER LLCJonathan O. Wilson, Attorney at LawP.O. Box 1102Morrison, Colorado 80465(720) 219-8366Fax: (303) 697-1189Jon.wilson.la w@hotmail.comw w w.WilsonLa wCenter.comI represent Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance, an organization withseveral hundred members around the country and internationally who have reason tobelieve they are targeted with various non-lethal weapons. These targeted individualssuffer physical and psychological symptoms as a result of the remote manipulation. Weseek your office’s assistance in initiating hearings and a fact-finding congressionalinquiry into the government agencies and/or private companies that are targeting citizens.Many citizens are desperate to be freed from the disturbing, intrusive and oppressivetargeting.Evidence supports the conclusion that weapons exist that could be used againstindividuals, based on U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings, public releases byagencies, and other technologies that indicate the level of technological sophistication.The weapons are believed to be based on electromagnetism, microwaves, sonic waves,lasers and other types of directed energy, and were characterized as “psychotronic” inRep. Dennis Kucinich’s draft of House Resolution 2977, the Space Preservation Act of2001. Furthermore, it is undeniable that government agencies have tested citizens withoutpermission in the past; for example, the CIA’s human experimentation discussed inOrlikow v. U.S., 682 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988), secretly administered lysergic aciddiethylamide discussed in United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987), and militarychemical experimentation as discussed in Congressional Committee Report 103-97, 103dCongress, 2d Session, S. Prt. 103-97 (Dec. 8, 1994). Lastly, the sheer numbers of peoplecomplaining of being targeted, including people with post-graduate degrees and a lifetimeof achievements, and the similarities in symptoms tend to outweigh a dismissive response30

ased on charges of anecdotal evidence or group paranoia.Several plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs have filed suits in the past levying similarcharges of directed weaponry, but, to my knowledge, all have been dismissed due toimmunity and state secret defenses, and the lack of evidence of a direct link to agenciesor companies. It is difficult to legally prove targeting by psychotronic weapons when theperpetrators operate from remote, unseen locations and therefore the targeting can bedismissed as delusional. Given the wide scope of alleged targeting, there is a certain riskof sounding too conspiratorial, however, common denominators such as physicalsymptoms and medical reports, surveillance scenarios, harassment techniques, and morecan be readily established.Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance will gladly provide your office, andany legislator and investigator, reports from targeted individuals documenting instancesof targeting, medical documentation, and recordings. This firm will provide research andinvestigation results upon request as well. We will diligently work with anyone willing tohelp. Please carefully consider convening hearings and an inquiry and collaborating withother legislators in an effort to uncover and stop this inhumane practice.Very truly yours,Jonathan WilsonAttorney for Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance31

Appendix DAreas Reporting Chemtrail ActivitySource: WillThomasOnline.comAlbuquerqueAmsterdam(Netherlands)AshevilleAspenAthens (Greece)AtlantaAustinBaltimoreBarcelona (Spain)Birmingham (England)BakersfieldBangorBelgiumBoiseBonn (Germany)BozemanBrooklynBuffaloBufordByron Bay (Australia)Calgary (Canada)Canberra (Australia)CharlotteCheyenneChicagoCincinnatiClaytonClevelandColumbusDallasDenverEspanola (Canada)Falmouth (UK)FargoFlagstaffFlintGalesburgGlasgow (Scotland)GreshamHamburg (Germany)HarrisonHeemskerk (Holland)Henån (Sweden)HoustonHundred Mile House(Canada)HuntsvilleIsle of Man (UK)Istanbul (Turkey)JonesboroKansas CityKnoxvilleLancaster (UK)LansingLas VegasLexingtonLittle RockLondon (UK)Los AngelesMallorca (Spain)Mannheim (Germany)MemphisMiamiMoabMoose Jaw (Canada)Naples (Italy)NashvilleNelson (Canada)OakvilleOmahaOrust (Croatia)ParhumpParis (France)Penticton (Canada)PeoriaPhiladelphiaPingelly (Australia)PhoenixPittsburghPortlandQuirindi (Australia)RenoRijeka (Croatia)RichmondSacramentoSalemSalt LakeSan AntonioSan FranciscoSanta FeSarasotaSeattleScotland (UK)SonoraSouth KoreaSouth Wales (UK)Spokanet. Petersburg (Russia)Stuttgart (Germany)SwitzerlandTimes SquareToronto (Canada)TucsonValdezVancouver (Canada)Venice (Italy)Versailles (France)Victoria (Canada)Walnut CreekWuerzburg (Germany)32

Appendix EIntelligence, Military, and Defense Contractorswho visited Carnicom.com (selected list)In 1999, Clifford Carnicom began to operate an independent,one-man, part-time, self-funded, research outfit focused on chemtrailsNote: website visits as of January 12, 2000 (many are multiple visits)Lockheed MartinLos Alamos National LaboratoryRaytheon Defense SystemsBoeing AircraftFederal Aviation AdministrationNASA Langley Research CenterUnited States EPAUSAF Headquarters (Pentagon)U.S. Department of the TreasuryAndrews Air Force BaseU.S. Naval Research CenterHoneywellWright-Patterson Air Force BaseAmes Research Center, NASAMerckTRWTeledyneU.S. Navy Medical DepartmentAir National GuardMonsantoDepartment of Veterans AffairsNOAAAllied Signal CorpU.S General Accounting OfficeBristol-Myers SquibbThe Mayo ClinicThe Federal JudiciaryFEMAU.S. SenateKaiser PermanenteCalifornia Pacific Medical CenterSan Francisco Dept of Public HealthNew Mexico Department of HealthMcMurdo Research Station, AntarticaAndersen Air Force Base, GuamMisawa Air Base, JapanHickam Air Force Base, HawaiiOsan Air Force Base, KoreaTinker Air Force BaseVandenberg Air Force BaseMinot Air Force BaseU.S. Department of JusticeNewsweek MagazineDARPAU.S. News and World ReportNew Zealand ParliamentNASA Goddard33

Appendix FOrganizations Concerned withIssues Covered in this White PaperFreedom From Covert Harassment andSurveillanceDerrick Robinson, Presidenthttp://www.freedomfchs.comderrickcrobinson@gmail.comCarnicom InstituteClifford Carnicom, PresidentPO Box 23721Santa Fe, NM 87502505-466-2784http://www.carnicominstitute.orgCenter for Cognitive Liberty and EthicsP.O. Box 73481Davis, CA 95617-3481 USAFax: 205. 449. 3119The Lay InstituteNick Begich, Executive DirectorDallas, Texasinfo@layinstitute.orgMind JusticeCheryl Welsh, Executive DirectorE-mail: welsh@mindjustice.org

- 2 -NOTES1. This account adapted from written testimony provided in: Steven Greer,Disclosure: Military and Government Witnesses Reveal the Greatest Secrets in ModernHistory (Crossing Point Publications, 2001), pages 441-446.2. Harlan E. Girard, “Effects of GHz radiation on the human nervous system:Recent developments in the technology of political control; analysis of mindcontrol electromagnetic weapons” (Global Research, May 6, 2006).http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23983. Dr. Armen Victorian, “The Military Use of Electromagnetic Microwave AndMind Control Technology” (February 29, 2008)http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=1202714. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2W7nGWOSu8&feature=related5. Nicholas Jones “Could The HAARP Project Be For Mind Control?”http://www.haarp.net/mindcontrol.htm6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2W7nGWOSu8&feature=related7. “The Military's Pandora's Box” by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manninghttp://www.haarp.net/8 Op cit, Dr. Armen Victorian.9 See http://educate-yourself.org/cn/americanmcinbaghdad29may03.shtml.“Operation Crimson Mist,” the most chilling case of mind control using EMweapon that I have seen, is cited in this article. According to Vialls, OperationCrimson Mist deployed energy weapons to induce the genocide in Rwanda in1994. Vialls is deceased, and the piece does not cite sources, so I have relegatedthis account to a footnote, but its implications—if true—are obviously earthshaking.“[This] lethal trick was repeated hundreds of times by the C-130 Herculesin Rwanda during April – July 1994 . . . What the C-130 crew were actuallyengaged in was ‘electromagnetically augmenting’ a pre-existing state. Remember thatthe agents and security service personnel first had to point the Hutu tribesmen inthe direction of the Tutsi [which Vialls explains earlier in the article], inducereasonable anger, and make sure they were appropriately armed. Only then couldthe C-130 go to work with the precise control brain wave of ‘rage,’ augmenting andthus upgrading crowd behavior from that of angry demonstrators to uncontrollablegenocidal maniacs. Although not ‘classic,’ this was and is unquestionably mindcontrol, for the simple reason that external means were being used to force anirresistible change in behavior.” In this same piece, Vialls also states that variousinstances of looting in Bagdad after the U.S. invasion of the city, including thefamous case of the looting of the Bagdad Museum, were “augmented” by energyweapons. Again, this cannot be confirmed given the current state of my research.10. Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, “US ElectromagneticWeapons and Human Rights: A Study of the History of US IntelligenceCommunity Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic

- 3 -Weapons,” December 2006, Sonoma State University/Project Censored/MediaFreedom Foundation, p. 26.11. Be sure to consult Dr. Nick Begich’s Controlling the Human Mind: TheTechnologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance, (Earthpulse Press,August 2006). See also: www.mindjustice.org, which documents the entire field,including Russian research and international efforts aimed at controlling oroutlawing electromagnetic weapons.12. Stated in an interview with Amy Goodman, “Star Wars in Iraq.” Radio/TVprogram broadcast by Democracy Now! on July 25th, 2006.http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/25/144225213. See Leonard David, “Beam Weapons almost ready for battle: directed energycould revolutionize warfare, expert says,” (January 14, 2006)http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10805240/14. Prof. Paola Manduca, “New and unknown deadly weapons used by Israeliforces,” Global Research (August 7, 2006).http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MAN20060807&articleId=291815. William Thomas, Convergence Weekly, January 1, 2005, “Microwaving Iraq:“Pacifying Rays Pose New Hazards to Iraqis,”http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Microwaving_Iraq.htm16. CNN.com, September 13th, 2006. See:http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=711117. Amy Worthington, “Chemtrails: Aerosol and Electromagnetic Weapons in theAge of Nuclear War” (June 1 2004)http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WOR406A.html18. Glen Grenwald, “The criminal NSA eavesdropping program” (Apr 1, 2010)http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/01/nsa20. Steven Greer, MD, Hidden Truth–Forbidden Knowledge (Crossing Point, 2006),page 134.21. Ando Arike, “The soft-kill solution: New frontiers in pain compliance,” Harper'sMagazine (March 2010) 22. http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/23. This account drawn from Remote Viewing, by Tim Rifat, available here:http://www.scribd.com/doc/20598146/Remote-Viewing-by-Tim-Rifat-Excellent-Full-Book24. This link is among many provides documentation of such uses of HAARP:http://www.evolver.net/user/sailing_beyond_knowledge/blog/play_haarp_global_increase_earthquakes

- 4 -25. Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, “HAARP: The Military'sPandora's Box: Electromagnetic Manipulation of the Earth's Climate,”http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17902 (March3, 2010). First published at HAARP.net (July 25, 2008).26. See Thomas’s complete timeline at:willthomasonline.net/.../Chemtrails_Timeline_1.html27. www.carnicom.com/mgr1.htm28. Clifford E Carnicom “ELF & the Human Antenna,” (Jan 19 2003)http://www.carnicom.com/elf9.htm, and also see at the same site, “The Earth Is theAntenna” (March 18, 2003).29. http://www.mindjustice.org/censored12-06.htm#toc