Weapons of Mass Coercion - Freedom From Covert Harassment ...

wounded and the dead.” These included (warning—this description is graphic): “Bodies with dead tissuesand no apparent wounds; ‘shrunken’ corpses; descriptions of extensive internal wounds with no trace ofshrapnel, corpses blackened but not burnt, and others heavily wounded that did not bleed . . . Many ofthese descriptions,” writes Maduca, “suggest the possibility that the new weapons used include ‘directenergy’ weapons, and chemical and/or biological agents, in a sort of macabre experiment of futurewarfare.” 14Item: Clandestine EM weapons deployed in Iraq neighborhoodsAccording to reliable reports, GIs faced with restive Iraqi neighborhoods were sometimes directed to installhidden transmitters that saturate areas with “pacifying” or disorienting electromagnetic frequencies. “Theidea behind microwaving Iraq’s more restive cities,” said one on-the-ground source, “is to keep them soagitated that they cannot coalesce into a full force of resistance fighters . . . The silent frequencies dailysweeping Fallujah and other trouble spots are the same Navy ‘freqs’ [frequencies] that drove whales nutsand made them go astray onto beaches.” For more targeted crowd control, less sophisticated weaponsmounted on Humvees were used to beam microwaves that flash-burn exposed flesh. 15Item at CNN.com: “Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs” Air ForceSecretary Michael Wynne stated in 2007 that “nonlethal weapons should be tested on U.S. civiliansbefore being used on the battlefield,” referring to the use of EM weapons in crowd-control situations.“The object is basically public relations,” said Wynne. “Domestic use would make it easier to avoidquestions from others about possible safety considerations.” 16Test weapons on U.S. civilians before using them on the battlefield? If an official at thislevel is ready to admit “domestic use” for testing the safety of nonlethal weapons, thenwe can be very certain that such tests are occurring, including tests of classifiedweapons.Let’s now consider the shocking evidence for the incidence of such “tests.”Domestic victims call attention to covert uses of EM weapons“There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy,its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas ofnational interest—free from all checks and balances—and free from thelaw itself.”—Daniel K. Inouye, U.S. Senator (Iran/Contra Hearings, 1986)There can be little doubt that covert operatives in and out of government have beenactively testing these devices on unsuspecting citizens, just as Air Force Chief Wynnestated. For the most part, they appear to operate free from legal scrutiny—perhaps inways that Senator Daniel K. Inouye alludes to in the above quote.The year 1975 witnessed the greatest revelation of the fact that the governmenthas actively researched political control technologies on its own citizens as test subjects.We now know that extensive Cold War-related “mind control” research took placebetween the 1950s and 1970s—and was epitomized by the CIA’s notorious, illegal MK-ULTRA program, an early attempt to narrow the gap against the Russians’ allegedsophisticated “psychotronics” research.Hearings on Project MK-ULTRA were initiated in 1975 in the U.S. Congress bythe Church Committee, and additional inquiries took place through a presidentialcommission known as the Rockefeller Commission. Investigative efforts were hamperedby the fact that CIA Director Richard Helms illegally ordered all MK-ULTRA filesdestroyed in 1973; the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission investigations12