Weapons of Mass Coercion - Freedom From Covert Harassment ...

Still, the weaponization of space obviously continues, and now is the time torevisit the sort of legislation pioneered by Kucinish, Webre, and Rosin.We have also come full circle with respect to the 9/11 movement. For, theoriginal 9/11 truth activists—despite all manner of suppression, harrassment, anddisinformation—have gone on to create one of the most impressive and successfulgrassroots movements in modern times.It should be pointed out that a bit of legislative progress has been made in recentyears on the issue of EM weapons. For the first time in the U.S., a sitting governmentbody has passed a law that recognizes that electromagnetic devices can be used asdestructive weapons against citizens. The state of Michigan passed such a law (MichiganPublic Law 256 2003) that went into effect in its Penal Code effective January 1, 2004. Itcriminalises such unlawful purposes as intending to actually harm or imitate suchintention in order to frighten, terrorise, intimidate, harass, injure or kill any person withsuch weapons, along with severe prison sentences.In addition, thanks in part to testimony before the European Union parliament byHAARP activist Dr. Nick Begich, the EU passed a resolution banning the use ofweapons “that can manipulate a person.” (See Parliament Resolution A4-005/99 entitled“Resolution on the Environment, Security, and Foreign Policy” passed on January 29,1999). According to Begich, during the hearings, the U.S. and NATO representatives tothe EU “sat in the back and declined to participate when asked.” 29Today, neurotechnology, psychotronics, and the impact of electromagneticenergy on consciousness and human health may appear to be the captive of today’s antidemocratic,materialistic, warlike, profit-driven culture. But the hubris of the scientistsand their secret-government sponsors who pursue this course will soon be seen tomerely represent one passing phase in the evolution of consciousness. Indeed, we canpredict that the mechanistic materialism at the heart of today’s model of neuroscience—and the value system that permits scientists to create invisible weapons based on thismodel for the purposes of secretly and silently disabling “enemies”—will soon be seen aspuerile and altogether unworthy of an advancing order of society.Wisdom and mature life experience both point to certain irreducible elements ofwhat it means to be human: These include the free-will desire to love and serve, and theexperience of the urge to evolve the soul, know the truth, and become truly free. Suchinsights will one day become lingua franca for enlightened neuroscientists who willeschew all efforts to weaponize their work.But in the final analysis, the solution requires that we resort to the rule of law; theperpetrators of human rights crimes linked to the weapons covered in this piece mustand will be prosecuted. Beyond that, citizen awareness and democratic oversight at thenational and global level will be crucial, and an understanding of the spiritual context ofall human evolution will as always remain indispensable.The Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been a guide for internationallaw for most of six decades, and as such binds the United States to its general principles.Article 5 specifically prohibits torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment. Global action on this basis may prove crucial to making a transition to aworld beyond the “covert war from within” on innocent populations.And yet ironically there’s a big “upside”—the ability of science to support theenhancement of human potentials by adapting technologies reviewed in this essay topeaceful uses. This opportunity alone contains the seeds for liberating us from very26