Weapons of Mass Coercion - Freedom From Covert Harassment ...

the secrecy was needed. The government reps then stated that if the generalpublic knew that the aircraft they were flying on were releasing chemicalsinto the air, environmentalist groups would raise hell and demand thespraying stop. Someone asked one of the G-men then if the chemicals areharmless, why not tell the public what the chemicals are and why we arespraying them? He seemed perturbed at this question and told us in a tone ofauthority that the public doesn’t need to know what's going on, but that thisprogram is in their best interests. He also stated that we should not tellanyone, nor ask any more questions about it. With that, the briefing wasover. All documents in our office pertaining to Project Cloverleaf are kept inlocked safes. Nobody is allowed to take these documents out of the office.Very few employees are allowed access to these documents, and they remaintight-lipped about what the documents say. Mr. Carnicom, I am no fool. Iknow there’s something going on. And frankly, I am scared. I feel a high levelof guilt that I have been aware of this kind of operation but unable to tellanyone. It’s been eating away at me, knowing that the company I work formay be poisoning the American people. I hope this letter will open someeyes to what’s happening. Again, I wish I could give you documentedinformation, but you have to understand why I must remain totallyanonymous.” 28Another confirmation that Carnicom was penetrating a monumental story wasthe list of visitors to his website—even in the first few years of his work. He had begunthe work in 1999, and by late 2000, these intelligence, military, and defense contractorshad visited Carnicom.com: Lockheed Martin, Los Alamos National Laboratory,Raytheon Defense Systems, Boeing Aircraft, Federal Aviation Administration, NASALangley Research Center, United States EPA, USAF Headquarters (Pentagon), U.S.Department of the Treasury, Andrews Air Force Base, U.S. Naval Research Center,Honeywell, and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. [A more complete list can be found inAppendix E.]Meanwhile, the stonewall continued, especially from agencies in charge of ouratmosphere, such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Carnicomand citizen researchers long ago learned that all chemtrail questions addressed to NOAAthe are directed to a spokesperson who simply replies that she “can't comment” onchemtrails.At some point, the U.S. Air Force—a frequent visitor to Carnicom.com—realizedit had to do something to quell the citizen outcry. On the hot seat, they issued a publicinformation paper in November, 2001. Predictably, they called chemtrails a “hoax” thatwas perpetrated by people confused over contrails. “The ‘Chemtrail’ hoax has beeninvestigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientificorganizations, and major media publications,” the statement claims.”Was this, presumably, the official answer to Senator Joseph Lieberman?Now it would take a much more courageous Congressperson with the backboneto take on all the weapons we have examined here: the shadowy world of chemtrails, thecovert applications of HAARP, and electromagnetic weapons—all under the rubric ofthe weaponization of space.Next up was Congressman Dennis Kucinich, armed with his “SpacePreservation Act of 2001,” originally introduced in the House as HR 2977.24