The Maryland Preservation Plan - 2005 - Maryland Historical Trust

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Maryland Preservation Plan, 2005The town of Emmitsburg, FrederickCounty, sponsored a community day tocelebrate the grand opening of "New MainStreet," the culmination of a five yearmain street rehabilitation project.Historic markers, like this one in RolandPark, Baltimore City, identify historic sitesand events.BOOKS, ARTICLES, ETC.Bartlett, Rebecca Leigh. The Implementation of Archaeological Resource ProtectionOrdinances in Urban Areas. Master thesis, George Washington University, 1986.Easily, V. Gail. Staying Inside the Line: Urban Growth Boundaries. PASS Report No. 440.Chicago, Ill.: American Planning Association, November 1992.Gagliardi, Neil and Stephen Morris. Local Historic Preservation Plans: A SelectedAnnotated Bibliography. Washington, D.C.: NPS, 1993.Lawson, Barry R., Ellen P. Ryan, and Rebecca Bartlett Hutchison. Reaching Out, ReachingIn: A Guide to Creating Effective Public Participation for State HistoricPreservation Programs. Sue L. Henry, ed. Washington ,D.C.: U.S. Department of thelnterior, National Park Service, 1993.Maryland Association of Historic District Commissions. “How Will Historic DistrictCommissions Affect My Community?” 1979-80, unpub.Maryland Historical Trust. “Major Preservation Issues and Related Solutions/StrategiesIdentified by Participants at The Maryland Preservation Plan, 2005 Workshops.”Crownsville, MD: Department of Housing and Community Development, MarylandHistorical Trust, June 1993. Photocopied.Maryland Office of Planning. Achieving “Consistency” Under The Planning Act of 1992.Managing Maryland’s Growth: Models and Guidelines Series No. 5. Baltimore, April 1994.Michigan Department of State. Michigan Historical Center. Preservation Shore to Shore:Michigan’s Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan. Lansing, MI, 1996.Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. Preserving Minnesota: A Plan for HistoricProperties in the New Century. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society, 1995.Pencek, William J. “State Targets Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas for EconomicDevelopment.” In Context. Maryland Historical Trust: Crownsville, Summer 1996.Ridout, Orlando, IV. “Historic Preservation in Maryland, 1894-1986.” Ph.D. diss. proposal,1986.White, Bradford J. And Richard J. Roddewig. Preparing a Historic Preservation Plan,Washington, D.C.: American Planning Association and the National Trust for HistoricPreservation, 1994.APPENDIX ISTATEWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXTSI. Geographic Organization:1. Eastern Shore (all Eastern Shore counties, and Cecil County)2. Western Shore (Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, St. Mary’s and PrinceGeorge’s counties)3. Piedmont (Harford, Baltimore, Carroll, Frederick, Howard and Montgomerycounties, Baltimore City)4. Western Maryland (Washington, Allegany, and Garrett counties)II. Chronological/Development Periods:1. Paleo-Indian 10000-7500 B.C.2. Early Archaic 7500-6000 B.C.3. Middle Archaic 6000-4000 B.C.4. Late Archaic 4000-2000 B.C.5. Early Woodland/Archaic 2000-500 B.C.6. Middle Woodland 500 B.C.-A.D. 9007. Late Woodland A.D. 900-16008. Contact and Settlement Period A.D. 1570-17509. Rural Agrarian Intensification A.D. 1680-181510. Agricultural/Industrial Transition A.D. 1815-187011. Industrial/Urban Dominance A.D. 1870-193012. Modern Period A.D. 1930-Present28
Suggestions for Implementing Statewide GoalsIII. Prehistoric Period Themes:1. Subsistence2. Settlement3. Political4. Demographic5. Religion6. Technology7. Environmental AdaptationIV. Historic Period Themes1. Agriculture2. Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Community Planning3. Economic (Commercial and Industrial)4. Government/Law5. Military6. Religion7. Social/Education/Cultural8. TransportationHISTORIC CONTEXT ORGANIZATIONHistoric contexts in The Maryland Preservation Plan, 2005: The Maryland Planare organized first by geographic region, then by time/developmental period, and then bytheme (field of activity or area of significance) and the types of cultural resources associatedwith each theme. This organizational system provides a necessary framework for thedescription and analysis of all known or expected cultural resource types, and the basisfor evaluating the significance of those resources.The four geographic regions of the State are generally recognized physiographicprovinces which also have distinctive cultural histories. The four regions are as follows:Building Doctor workshops were held inEaston, Talbot County, during Maryland's1994 Preservation and RevitalizationConference.I. EASTERN SHORE (Eastern Shore, including Cecil County)II. WESTERN SHORE, (Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, St. Mary’s,and PrinceGeorge’s counties)III. PIEDMONT (Harford, Baltimore, Carroll, Frederick, Howard, Montgomerycounties andBaltimore City)IV. WESTERN MARYLAND (Washington, Allegany, and Garrett counties)Each of the above geographic regions will then be divided into the following time/developmental periods:A. PALEO-INDIAN 10000-7500 B.C.Evidence indicates that territorial semi-nomadic bands, dependent primarily on huntingbut also utilizing a variety of other resources, exploited a much colder, late glacial environmentin which big game animals such as mastodon and mammoth roamed extensivegrasslands.B. EARLY ARCHAIC 7500-6000 B.C.General social organization remained much the same as the band-level societies of thePaleo-Indian period. However, a warming climate with an attendant replacement ofgrassland areas and associated big game animals with boreal forests and smaller animalssuch as deer, resulted in gradual cultural change.C. MIDDLE ARCHAIC 6000-4000 B.C.More modern environmental conditions led to a probable rise in population due to moreavailable food resources. Increasing emphasis was placed on exploiting a diversity ofvaried resources.CLG workshop participants take awalking tour of Brookeville, MontgomeryCounty.29
Page 1 and 2: THE MARYLANDPRESERVATION PLAN2005
Page 3 and 4: THE MARYLAND HISTORICPRESERVATION P
Page 6 and 7: The Maryland Preservation Plan, 200
Page 24: The Maryland Preservation Plan, 200
Page 27 and 28: The Status of Heritage ResourcesGOA
Page 29 and 30: The Status of Heritage Resources•
Page 31: Suggestions for Implementing Statew
Page 35 and 36: Selected Bibliographyagricultural a
Page 37 and 38: Statewide Historic Contextszoos, an
Page 39 and 40: Statewide Historic ContextsAmerican
Page 41 and 42: Partners in Statewide Heritage Cons
Page 43 and 44: Cover photo is courtesy of Tom Dard

The Maryland Preservation Plan - 2005 - Maryland Historical Trust

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?