10.07.2015 Views

Redefining the built environment and industry Annual Report 2012

Redefining the built environment and industry Annual Report 2012

Redefining the built environment and industry Annual Report 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Content02 Mission <strong>and</strong> Vision • 03 Strategic Thrusts & Core Values • 04 BCA’s Corporate Social Responsibility Statement• 05 Corporate Governance • 06 Chairman’s Message • 08 Board Members• 10 Senior Management • 12 BCA’s Organisation Structure • 14 Stats at a Glance18 Re: Think • 24 Re: Shape • 36 Re: Invent • 44 Re: Vitalise • 51 Acknowledgements


Theconstruction<strong>industry</strong> is at <strong>the</strong>crossroads.With an ageing working population, it is vital that we attractnew blood into <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> <strong>industry</strong> for future growth.It is time we reinvent our br<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> how we appeal to <strong>the</strong>young. We have conducted aggressive marketing <strong>and</strong> introducedmany new initiatives such as scholarship, sponsorship <strong>and</strong>apprenticeship programmes to make <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> more attractiveto new entrants, <strong>the</strong>reby attracting new blood into <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.We will continue to do so by taking on a thorough approachto reshape, rethink, reinvent <strong>and</strong> revitalise <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.| 01 |


StrategicThrustsWe aim to be a caring <strong>and</strong> progressive organisationthat values its people, <strong>the</strong> innovative spirit, integrity,<strong>and</strong> service excellence.We ensure high safety st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> promote qualityexcellence in <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>.We champion barrier-free accessibility <strong>and</strong>sustainability of <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>.We lead <strong>and</strong> transform <strong>the</strong> building <strong>and</strong> construction<strong>industry</strong> by:• enhancing skills <strong>and</strong> professionalism• improving design <strong>and</strong> construction capabilities• developing niche expertise• promoting export of construction-related servicesWe forge effective partnerships with <strong>the</strong> stakeholders<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> community to achieve our vision.We CareWe care for <strong>the</strong> well-being of our staff,<strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>environment</strong>.We serve our customers with respect <strong>and</strong>integrity.CoreValuesWe Dare to DreamWe dare to be innovative <strong>and</strong> seekopportunities to transform BCA <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>industry</strong>.We Can DoWe are a resilient organisation with <strong>the</strong>confidence, courage <strong>and</strong> ability toovercome challenges.| 03 |


BCA’s CorporateSocial ResponsibilityStatementBCA is dedicated to contributing to <strong>the</strong> well-being of <strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>environment</strong> through our efforts in shaping a sustainable <strong>and</strong> friendly <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>.Serving The CommunityTo us, serving <strong>the</strong> community is a privilege. Embedded in our core value, We care, wetake pride in each <strong>and</strong> every contribution as we serve with our hearts for <strong>the</strong> good of<strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> to promote an inclusive society.To achieve this, BCA will:• shape a friendly <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> for Singapore through improving accessibility<strong>and</strong> promoting Universal Design;• inculcate a spirit of volunteerism among staff;• organise purposeful programmes that help to bring about a better <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>for all; <strong>and</strong>• raise public awareness of <strong>the</strong> importance of a friendly <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> throughdialogues, public education <strong>and</strong> collaborative projects.Greening The Built Environment (BCA's Environment Policy)BCA takes pride as <strong>the</strong> Green Leader for Singapore's <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>. Carefor <strong>the</strong> <strong>environment</strong> is embedded strongly in our core values, <strong>and</strong> we arecommitted to championing this worthy cause toge<strong>the</strong>r with our stakeholdersto help promote <strong>environment</strong>ally sustainable developments.To achieve this, BCA will:• spearhead green strategies <strong>and</strong> initiatives towards sustainabilityin <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>;• champion <strong>and</strong> lead <strong>the</strong> building <strong>and</strong> construction <strong>industry</strong> in<strong>the</strong> development of sustainable building <strong>and</strong> sustainableconstruction;• actively engage stakeholders through dialogues, public education<strong>and</strong> collaborative projects; <strong>and</strong>• inculcate <strong>environment</strong>al awareness <strong>and</strong> commitment amongstour staff through educational <strong>and</strong> actionable programmes.| 04 |


CorporateGovernanceBCA is committed to good corporate governance. We have put in place a Codeof Corporate Governance to formalise <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>and</strong> practices of governancewithin BCA to ensure accountability, responsibility <strong>and</strong> transparency.Board MembersThe Board currently comprises 13 members. All are non-executive members, exceptDr John Keung who is BCA’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The Board comprisesrepresentatives from <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>, academia <strong>and</strong> ministries. The diverse representationof <strong>the</strong> Board provides an appropriate range of experience, skills, knowledge <strong>and</strong>perspectives to enable it to play an active role in guiding BCA to achieve its mission<strong>and</strong> vision.The Chairman provides strategic leadership <strong>and</strong> guidance to <strong>the</strong> Management ofBCA, <strong>and</strong> ensures that discussions are fairly, objectively <strong>and</strong> independentlyconducted.The Board meets at least six times a year to evaluate, approve <strong>and</strong> monitor <strong>the</strong>plans <strong>and</strong> budgets of BCA. It also oversees <strong>the</strong> work <strong>and</strong> performance of <strong>the</strong>Management <strong>and</strong> assesses <strong>the</strong> financial health of BCA. The BCA Act empowers<strong>the</strong> Board to form committees from among its members to support <strong>the</strong> work of<strong>the</strong> Board.Finance <strong>and</strong> AuditInternal ControlsThe Board ensures that <strong>the</strong> Management maintains a sound system of internalcontrols to safeguard <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>and</strong> assets of BCA. It also ensures that a reviewof BCA’s material internal controls, including financial, operational <strong>and</strong> complianceas well as risk management, is conducted annually through internal <strong>and</strong>/or externalaudits according to <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> Audit Committee.Finance <strong>and</strong> Audit CommitteeThe Finance <strong>and</strong> Audit Committee reviews <strong>the</strong> audited financial statements wi<strong>the</strong>xternal auditors, as well as reviews audit plans <strong>and</strong> observations of <strong>the</strong> external<strong>and</strong> internal auditors. It also ensures that <strong>the</strong> Management takes appropriateaction for audit observations <strong>and</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> Audit Committee’s recommendations.All members in <strong>the</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> Audit Committee are non-executive members.| 05 |


Chairman’s MessageChartingMilestonesRecognition as encouragement2011 was a watershed year for us, having achieved manyfirsts in key areas of our responsibility.Our leadership role in driving <strong>the</strong> greening of buildingsthrough <strong>the</strong> Green Building Masterplan was validated whenwe were conferred <strong>the</strong> first-ever Regional Leadership Awardby <strong>the</strong> World Green Building Council in December 2011.In September 2011, we formally established <strong>the</strong> BCA Centrefor Sustainability, one of <strong>the</strong> few collaborating centres with<strong>the</strong> United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> first in Asia.We scored a first in <strong>the</strong> world for allowing architectural,structural <strong>and</strong> M&E submission for regulatory approval inBuilding Information Modelling (BIM) format, thusstreamlining <strong>the</strong> regulatory submission process. Lookingahead, we will progressively introduce m<strong>and</strong>atory BIM e-submissions over <strong>the</strong> next few years.Greening <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>As a small city-state with an open economy, Singapore isparticularly vulnerable to <strong>the</strong> consequences of climate change.Hence, we have been using different approaches to pushfor sustainable development in Singapore. Key levers are ourGreen Building Masterplan <strong>and</strong> Green Mark Scheme.More <strong>and</strong> more countriesare approaching us to workwith <strong>the</strong>m to developgreen building capabilitiesin <strong>the</strong>ir countries. Thescheme has now beenused or adapted for use inmore than 10 countries.We’ll be rolling out morenew BCA Green Markschemes this year toinfluence businesses <strong>and</strong>communities to adoptsustainable practices <strong>and</strong>play a greater role in <strong>the</strong>green building movement.| 06 |Mapletree Business City- Zhang Qi, 2011


Encouraging <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> on <strong>the</strong>ir productivity journeysConstruction dem<strong>and</strong> is expected to stay at a healthy levelof between $22 billion <strong>and</strong> $28 billion a year for <strong>2012</strong> <strong>and</strong>2013. Against this backdrop, it is essential that <strong>industry</strong>growth is achieved through productivity <strong>and</strong> innovationpractices.To fur<strong>the</strong>r build momentum in <strong>the</strong> productivity drive, weheld <strong>the</strong> inaugural Singapore Construction Productivity Weekin April 2011. The Build Smart Conference <strong>and</strong> BuildTechAsia exhibition were excellent opportunities for <strong>industry</strong>stakeholders to engage one ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> embrace skillsimprovement, innovation <strong>and</strong> productivity gains in order toachieve sustainable growth in <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>industry</strong>.We have seen success in engaging bigger firms to come onboard <strong>the</strong> productivity journey. Moving forward, we’ll havemore outreach activities to rope in <strong>the</strong> smaller firms, throughcollaborating with <strong>the</strong> Singapore Contractors’ AssociationLtd. (SCAL) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association of Small <strong>and</strong> MediumEnterprises (ASME).An inclusive <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> for allWhile we focus on improving <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> tocreate a world-class city, we must not forget <strong>the</strong> needs of<strong>the</strong> elderly or those with physical limitations. Our AccessibilityMasterplan has guided us well. We worked with variouspublic agencies to take <strong>the</strong> lead in improving <strong>the</strong> accessibilityof <strong>the</strong>ir buildings. Close to 100% of <strong>the</strong>se buildingsfrequented by members of <strong>the</strong> public had achieved at leastbasic barrier-free accessibility, a great improvement from<strong>the</strong> 50% recorded in 2007.In an effort to bring on board more building owners, we’veenhanced <strong>the</strong> Accessibility Fund <strong>and</strong> extended <strong>the</strong> fundingtimeframe till end 2016.We are currently reviewing <strong>the</strong> Accessibility Code to havemore m<strong>and</strong>atory elderly <strong>and</strong> family-centric provisions incertain categories of buildings.Safety first, alwaysAt BCA, safety is mission critical. In fulfilling this mission,we regularly review our regulatory framework <strong>and</strong> legislationsto ensure our buildings remain safe for <strong>the</strong> public. Forexample, we worked with SPRING to formulate a roadmap<strong>and</strong> embarked on initiatives to ensure a smooth transitionfrom <strong>the</strong> British St<strong>and</strong>ards to Eurocodes for structural buildingdesigns in Singapore.Meanwhile, we also took on a new role as regulator foramusement ride safety on 1 July 2011. To this end, we workclosely with ride owners to ensure safety, so that <strong>the</strong> publiccan enjoy <strong>the</strong> rides with peace of mind.Moving forward, we will continue to build up <strong>and</strong> groomteams of technical experts within BCA.Quality, our hallmarkThe BCA Quality Mark (QM) for Good Workmanship hasbeen gaining traction as a mark of assurance with a takeuprate of almost 50% of private residential units launched.Additionally, we are constantly looking for ways to fur<strong>the</strong>renhance our customer service. One such initiative was <strong>the</strong>launch of an online system in August 2011 for applications ofquality assessments, bringing much convenience to our users.The road aheadAs you can see, we have implemented a multi-prongedapproach to create a better <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> for all to live,work <strong>and</strong> play. While a lot has been done, we will continueto explore o<strong>the</strong>r approaches. Concerted engagement of allstakeholders is key to ensuring that <strong>the</strong> formulation of plansfor <strong>the</strong> way forward gives due consideration to differentconcerns <strong>and</strong> needs, so let’s continue to work toge<strong>the</strong>r tocreate <strong>the</strong> best <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> possible for Singapore.Quek See TiatChairman| 07 |


BoardMembers030405060102[From left to right]01. Mr Quek See Tiat(Chairman)[From April 2001, appointedChairman since April 2007]Ex-Partner <strong>and</strong> ex-Deputy ChairmanPricewaterhouseCoopers,Singapore02. Mr Lee Chuan Seng(Deputy Chairman)[From April 2003, appointedDeputy Chairman since April 2011]ChairmanBeca Carter Hollings <strong>and</strong> Ferner(SEA) Pte Ltd03. Dr John Keung[From June 2006]Chief Executive OfficerBuilding <strong>and</strong> ConstructionAuthority04. Prof Bertil Andersson[From April 2011]PresidentNanyang Technological University05. Mr Federic Perez[From April 2007]Construction DirectorDragages Singapore Pte Ltd06. Mr Ho Tong Yen[From April 2011]Chief Executive OfficerSino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-CityInvestment <strong>and</strong> Development Co.Ltd| 08 |


07080910 111213[From left to right]07. Mr John Lim[From April 2009]DirectorHigher Education DivisionMinistry of Education08. Mr Kevin Wong[From April 2009]Group Chief Executive OfficerKeppel L<strong>and</strong> Limited09. Mr Lai Huen Poh[From April 2011]Managing DirectorRSP Architects Planners & Engineers (Pte) Ltd10. Mr Lee Fook Sun[From April 2011]PresidentSingapore Technologies Electronics Ltd11. Mr Norman Ip[From April 2009]AdvisorThe Straits Trading Company Limited12. Mr Pek Lian Guan[From April 2007]Managing DirectorTiong Seng Contractors (Pte) Ltd13. Mr Richard Hassell[From April 2009]Founding DirectorWOHA Architects Pte Ltd| 09 |


10. Mr Cheng Tai FattDeputy Managing Director, BCAAcademy11. Mr Chew Keat ChuanGroup Director, Building Engineering12. Mr Ang Kian SengGroup Director, Research13. Mr Neo Choon KeongGroup Director, Manpower & StrategicPolicy14. Mr Koh Lin JiGroup Director, InternationalDevelopment15. Mr Ang Lian AikActing Group Director,Construction Productivity Centre16. Ms Jeanna DasActing Group Director,Corporate Development10111213 141516| 11 |


BCA’s OrganisationStructure(With effect from 15 August <strong>2012</strong>)CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERDR JOHN KEUNGSENIORADVISORMR BENEDICT TANDEPUTY CEOINDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTMR LAM SIEW WAHDEPUTY CEOBUILDING CONTROLMR ONG SEE HOConstructionProductivityCentreAg Grp DirectorMr Ang Lian AikTechnologyDevelopmentGroupGrp DirectorMr Tan Tian ChongManpower &StrategicPolicy GroupGrp DirectorMr Neo Choon KeongBusinessDevelopmentGroupGrp DirectorMr William TanBuilding Plan& ManagementGroupGrp DirectorMr Chin Chi LeongBuildingEngineeringGroupGrp DirectorMr Chew Keat ChuanProductivityDevelopment(Industry)DirectorDarren LimQuality &CertificationDirectorMr Ding Hock HuiDy DirectorMr Tan Boon KeeManpowerPlanningDirectorMs Grace MuiProcurementPoliciesDirectorVacantDy DirectorMs Hor Wai YeeUniversal DesignDirectorMs Goh Siam ImmStrategicEngineeringProjectsDirectorMr Lim Beng KweePractices &ResearchDirectorDarren LimGreenBuilding PolicyDirectorMr Ang Kian Seng (cov)Dy DirectorMs Serene PehManpowerDevelopmentDirectorMs Tan Lay TwanEconomicsResearchDirectorMs Lo Yen LeeBuilding Plan <strong>and</strong>AdvertisementLicensingDirectorMr Teo Orh HaiPolicy &RegulationsDirectorMs Andris LeongProductivityDevelopment(Mechanisation)DirectorMr Tan Chee KiatDy DirectorMs Rose NguanGreen Mark(Existing Buildings)DirectorMr Toh Eng ShyanManaging forExcellence OfficeDirectorVacantDy DirectorMs Phua Hui ChunStrategicMaterialsDirectorMs Ng Siew KuanBuildingControl PoliciesDirectorMs Meet KaurDy DirectorMr Choong Teck MinConstruction &EnforcementDirectorMs Chan Bee BeeBuildabilityDevelopmentDirectorVacantDy DirectorMs Foo-Leoh Chay HongGreen Mark(New Development)DirectorMr Jeffery NengDy DirectorDr Gao Chun PingStrategic PolicyDirectorVacantDy Director (Planning)VacantDy Director (Policy)Ms Pauline GohHuman CapitalDevelopmentDirectorMr Gary ChangConstructionEngineeringCapabilityDevelopmentDirectorVacantDy DirectorMr Tan Wee KwangBuilding Plan &EnforcementDirectorMr Raymond TayBuildingManagementDirectorMr Lim Chong YongDy DirectorMr Jeremy TanBridges &Structural SteelDirectorMr Thanabal KaliannanDy Director(Innovative Materials& Solutions)Mr Lung Hian HaoDeep Excavation &GeotechnicalDirectorMr Yang Kin SengDy Director(Geological Office)Mr Kiefer ChiamAmusementRides SafetyAg DirectorMr Hashim Bin Mansoor| 12 |


MANAGING DIRECTORBCA ACADEMYMR WILLIAM TANEXECUTIVE DIRECTORSERVICESMR CHOO WHATT BINSpecialFunctionsGroupGrp DirectorMr Ong Chan LengRegistrarProfessionalEngineers BoardMr Chin Jen ChyiBCAAcademyDy MDMr Cheng Tai FattResearchGroupGrp DirectorMr Ang Kian SengInternationalDevelopmentGroupGrp DirectorMr Koh Lin JiCorporateDevelopmentGroupAg Grp DirectorMs Jeanna DasTransit ShelterEngineeringDirectorMr Lee Chee KeongSchool of Graduate& ManagementDevelopmentDirectorMrs Leong-Kok Su MingDy DirectorMs May SiuCentre forSustainableBuilding &ConstructionCentre DirectorVacantDy DirectorDr Edward AnggadjajaAsia PacificDirectorVacantDy DirectorDr Gao Chun PingInformationTechnologyDirectorDr Tan Kee WeeCivil DefenceShelter EngineeringDirectorMs Chua Bee TeeEnforcement& StructuralInspectionDirectorMr Clement TsengSchool of Building &DevelopmentAg DirectorDr Keow Yeong MingCorporateServices OfficeDirectorVacantDy DirectorMs Jaime LoongR&DProgrammesDirectorMr Ang Kian Seng (cov)South Asia& Middle EastDirectorVacantDy DirectorMr Goh Wee HongCommunicationsDirectorMs Jeanna Das (Cov)Dy Director(3P Relations)Ms Stella WongDy Director(CorporateCommunications)Ms Leong Ee LengDy Director(Customer Services)Ms Lam Fei YenCoastal & ProjectManagementDirectorMr Chua Lian ChyeDy Director(Coastal Protection)Mr Ho Chai TeckMarketing &Business DevtDirectorMrs Leong-Kok Su Ming(cov)LegalGeneral CounselMs Meet KaurCentre forConstruction ITCentre DirectorDr Tan Kee WeeDy DirectorMs Soon Lay KuanFinanceDirectorMrs Yeo-Lau Hui TiangDy Director(Procurement)Ms Rachel ChuaCorporateAdminDirectorMs Jeanna Das (Cov)| 13 |


Stats at aGlance364BIM projects1597 BIM submissionsBIM amount awarded:$4.44 million168firms applied forBIM FundMore than 11,000 CoreTrade personnel registered with BCA600 More than projects withtotal contract value of over $60 billiondeployed CoreTrade personnel9,410private residential units in Singaporecommitted to Quality Mark in FY201124,656household shelters <strong>and</strong> 1,216 storey shelters in public <strong>and</strong>private residential buildings were commissioned in FY20115 transit shelters were tested <strong>and</strong> commissioned in FY2011102 buildings supported byAccessibility Fund52 Universal Design Awardsconferred since 20076,387Servednotices on building owners to carry out Periodic StructuralInspection in FY2011More than 2,400buildings rated for userfriendlinessServed 56 orders to ownersto carry out rectification toreinstate structural integrity<strong>and</strong> safety of <strong>the</strong>ir buildingsin FY2011Investigated 300cases of unauthorisedstructures in FY2011Completed upgrading works in 29private estates| 14 |


67active amusement rides42 active permanent rides25 active relocatable ridesplanned rides at12 design review stage8rides under constructionBCA Construction Excellence Award (CEA) is in its 27 thyear of competition187 Construction Excellence Awards <strong>and</strong> 180Certificates of Merit given out from 1986 to 201117Awards <strong>and</strong> 11Certificates of Merit given out in 20113,393advertisement licencesissued in FY20116,228building plans submitted inFY20112,997 TemporaryOccupation Permits(TOP) issued in FY 201114,885structural plans submittedas of end FY20114,959 Certificatesof Statutory Completionissued in FY20117,089constructionpermitsissued as of endFY2011Average CONQUAS score inFY2011 is85.7Top three CONQUAS scores are97.3, 96.5<strong>and</strong> 96.3CONQUAS penetration rate in8Singapore for private residential 95<strong>and</strong> commercial projectsCONQUAS is registered or used incountries <strong>and</strong> counting (Malaysia,Thail<strong>and</strong>,China, Hong Kong, Australia, India, South Africa& United Kingdom)| 15 |


CONSTRUCTION DEMAND(EXCLUDING RECLAMATION PROJECTS)$Billion35.735.227.624.520.222.520.0TotalPrivate SectorPublic Sector14.54.89.710.04.65.410.35.74.611.57.54.016.813.13.718.85.715.58.613.919.08.615.22002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011CONSTRUCTION OUTPUT$Billion26.230.927.4 27.713.312.2 11.612.2 12.917.918.420.816.4 16.36.27.15.3 5.2 6.0 7.612.46.9 6.4 6.2 5.3 5.57.810.1 11.0 11.4TotalPrivate SectorPublic Sector2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011| 16 |


CONSTRUCTION GDP (AT 2005 MARKET PRICES)$Billion10.510.911.29.07.27.56.66.2 6.36.42002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Source: Singapore Department of StatisticsNO. OF BCA GREEN MARK BUILDING PROJECTS IN SINGAPORENo. of building projects4277361,18023917 33127FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011| 17 |


Re:Think| 18 |


Building safety is something that most of us take forgranted. At BCA, we are constantly refining ourbuilding control system to ensure <strong>the</strong> safety of buildingusers, so you can be assured anytime, anywhere.| 19 |


Our engineers check <strong>the</strong> construction sites for compliance with <strong>the</strong> Building Control Act <strong>and</strong> RegulationsMigration from British St<strong>and</strong>ards to EurocodesHistorically, <strong>the</strong> building codes in Singapore are based onBritish St<strong>and</strong>ards. However, <strong>the</strong>se st<strong>and</strong>ards have now beenwithdrawn as <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom (UK) has migrated to anew suite of British St<strong>and</strong>ards based on <strong>the</strong> Eurocodes.Therefore, Singapore would also be migrating to <strong>the</strong> Eurocodesto align our building codes with <strong>the</strong> practices in <strong>the</strong> UK asour construction <strong>industry</strong> <strong>and</strong> design practices are similar.To ensure a smooth transition to <strong>the</strong> Eurocodes in Singapore,<strong>the</strong>se new st<strong>and</strong>ards would co-exist with <strong>the</strong> current designst<strong>and</strong>ards for a period of two years starting from end <strong>2012</strong>or early 2013.During <strong>the</strong> two-year period, we will work with professionalassociations <strong>and</strong> local experts to develop <strong>and</strong> conducttraining programmes to equip our <strong>industry</strong> for a smoothtransition to Eurocodes.Taking steps to ensure safe constructionThe Builder Licensing Scheme, introduced in 2009 sets minimumst<strong>and</strong>ards of professionalism for builders, to ensure that <strong>the</strong>yare professionally qualified <strong>and</strong> competent. In FY2011, <strong>the</strong>rewere 934 Class 1 <strong>and</strong> 2,473 Class 2 General Builders, as wellas 658 Specialist Builders in six categories of specialist works.BCA also worked with <strong>the</strong> Singapore Structural Steel Society(SSSS) to develop a quality assurance system for “re-used”struts <strong>and</strong> sheet piles used in bracing of earth-retainingstructure for excavation works. This is in accordance with <strong>the</strong>Eurocodes construction execution st<strong>and</strong>ards.The Flower Dome at Gardens by <strong>the</strong> Bay| 20 |


International Cruise TerminalEnsuring quality of materialsConcrete is widely used in Singapore for building works. Tomaintain a safe <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>, it is essential to ensure that<strong>the</strong> concrete used is of good quality. BCA has worked with<strong>the</strong> Singapore Accreditation Council (SAC) to implement <strong>the</strong>Certification Scheme for Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) suppliers.Since April 2011, RMC that is used for structural elementswould have to be supplied by accredited RMC producers.Major projects completed in 2011 include:• MRT Circle Line• Gardens by <strong>the</strong> Bay• Punggol Waterway• NUS University Town• International Cruise TerminalThe Punggol WaterwayIACCThe Inter-Agency Coordinating Committee (IACC) was officially established in July 2011. The committee chaired by <strong>the</strong>Commissioner of Building Control looks into conflicting regulatory requirements imposed by different agencies that areencountered in projects, as well as conflicting policies implemented by agencies, which impact construction productivity.The IACC consists of members from various regulatory agencies <strong>and</strong> associations which are representative of key stakeholdersin <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>. Any project team encountering conflicting policies <strong>and</strong> regulatory requirements that impede constructionactivities can present <strong>the</strong>m to IACC for speedy resolution.| 21 |


The new Amusement Rides SafetyFramework ensures that rides aredesigned, maintained <strong>and</strong> operatedaccording to recognised internationalsafety codes <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardsProtecting amusement ride patronsThe new Amusement Rides Safety Act came into effect on1 July 2011. The new regulatory framework ensures thatrides are designed, maintained <strong>and</strong> operated according torecognised international safety codes <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards. Fourclosure orders <strong>and</strong> notices to cease operations were servedin FY2011.As Singapore’s amusement rides <strong>industry</strong> is still in <strong>the</strong> infancystage, <strong>the</strong>re is a need to build up <strong>the</strong> competency of bothour staff <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>. To date, 16 Specialist ProfessionalEngineers in Amusement Rides Engineering are registeredwith <strong>the</strong> Professional Engineers Board.Communicating to <strong>the</strong> public on window safetyEfforts in public education continue with <strong>the</strong> bi-annual “6/6<strong>and</strong> 12/12” windows campaign to reinforce <strong>the</strong> importanceof window safety. Four roving exhibitions to teachhomeowners simple window maintenance tips have beenheld to date. Since 2005, <strong>the</strong> number of fallen windows hasdropped from 125 to 57 in 2011 - a 55% decrease.Four roving exhibitions to teach homeowners simplewindow maintenance tips have been held to date| 22 |


Our engineers conduct audit exercises at MRT stations to ensure public safetySlope safetyTo ensure slope stability, BCA implemented severalpro-active measures including yearly distribution ofpublic education leaflets <strong>and</strong> advisory letters toowners of buildings near slope areas, as well asformulated a three-stage slope managementframework for 22 government agencies to protect<strong>the</strong>ir slopes. So far, <strong>the</strong>se protective measures havebeen effective <strong>and</strong> no slope failure incident occurredin 2011.Moving forward, neighbourhood focus groupsessions would be held to reinforce <strong>the</strong> messageon preventive measures to ensure slope safety.Coastal protection <strong>and</strong> maintenance of foreshore structures• Lead agency for coastal protectionAs <strong>the</strong> lead agency for coastal protection against a rise in sealevel, we work with o<strong>the</strong>r government agencies to develop arobust coastline protection regulatory system <strong>and</strong> build upexpertise on coastal protection in Singapore. To facilitate <strong>the</strong>development of a protective regulatory system, we initiated<strong>the</strong> Risk Map Study to assess <strong>the</strong> impact of climate change onSingapore’s coastline <strong>and</strong> potential coastal inundation risks.We have also <strong>built</strong> up a strong network of establishedinternational experts on coastal protection.• Maintenance of foreshore structuresWe currently maintain 11km of Singapore’s foreshore structures.A regular inspection, repair <strong>and</strong> maintenance schedule is inplace to ensure <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>and</strong> structural safety of <strong>the</strong>seforeshore structures.Estate Upgrading Programmes44 private estates were selected for upgrading under <strong>the</strong> EstateUpgrading Programme (EUP). The programme aims to enhance<strong>the</strong> common living <strong>environment</strong> of private estate dwellers byproviding upgrades to <strong>the</strong> public areas in <strong>the</strong> estates. As of March<strong>2012</strong>, upgrading works in 29 private estates had been completed.More accessible features willbe available at estates that haveundergone <strong>the</strong> EstateUpgrading Programme| 23 |


Re:Shape| 24 |


We need to take bold steps toreshape <strong>the</strong> way our construction<strong>industry</strong> works <strong>and</strong> enhance <strong>the</strong><strong>industry</strong>’s image.| 25 |


The inaugural Singapore Construction Productivity Week included events such as <strong>the</strong> Build Smart Conference <strong>and</strong> BuildTech AsiaExhibition, to share <strong>the</strong> latest developments on <strong>the</strong> productivity frontShaping <strong>the</strong> future - The ConstructionProductivity RoadmapProductivity is <strong>the</strong> hottest buzzword inSingapore in recent years. For <strong>the</strong>construction <strong>industry</strong>, <strong>the</strong> ConstructionProductivity Roadmap lights <strong>the</strong> wayforward for <strong>the</strong> construction sector’sproductivity movement.“There are many initiatives in place to provideassistance to firms. We’d like to urge firmswho have yet to embark on <strong>the</strong>ir productivitydrive to come forward <strong>and</strong> begin <strong>the</strong>irproductivity journey with us to staycompetitive <strong>and</strong> profitable. We’ll do our bestto help <strong>the</strong>m move ahead.”Dr John Keung, Chief Executive Officer, Building <strong>and</strong>Construction AuthorityAs of 31 March <strong>2012</strong>, through <strong>the</strong> strong accountmanagement <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>holding efforts of <strong>the</strong> BCA’sConstruction Productivity Centre <strong>and</strong> Centre forConstruction Information Technology, more than1,100 companies have benefited from <strong>the</strong>Construction Productivity <strong>and</strong> Capability Fund(CPCF) with committed amount of more than $44million. Among <strong>the</strong>se, about 68% were small tomedium-sized companies.Participants of <strong>the</strong> Skilled Builder Competition hard at work during <strong>the</strong>Singapore Construction Productivity Week| 26 |


The first nationwide BIM Competition was organised during<strong>the</strong> Singapore Construction Productivity WeekCreating awareness <strong>and</strong> ownershipBCA held <strong>the</strong> inaugural Singapore Construction ProductivityWeek (SCPW) in April 2011 to increase <strong>the</strong> awareness ofproductivity improvement among <strong>the</strong> huge number ofcompanies in <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> through a week-long campaign.More than 6,000 visitors <strong>and</strong> 257 exhibitors participated in<strong>the</strong> inaugural SCPW.BCA also introduced a string of national-level productivityawards to recognise <strong>the</strong> productivity efforts of stakeholdersin 2011. The inaugural Construction Productivity Awards(CPA) was given out at <strong>the</strong> annual BCA Awards in May 2011.A total of 31 awards were conferred under <strong>the</strong> threecategories of CPA, namely CPA – Projects, CPA – Best Practices<strong>and</strong> Innovations; <strong>and</strong> CPA – Value-Added Productivity.Measuring progressBCA has been monitoring <strong>the</strong> productivity of buildingprojects to establish annual benchmark indicators for projectproductivity. In September 2011, <strong>the</strong> Electronic ProductivitySubmission System (ePSS) was launched <strong>and</strong> deployed asan <strong>industry</strong>-wide infrastructure for <strong>the</strong> submission ofconstruction productivity data. It is <strong>the</strong> first of its kind in<strong>the</strong> world that uses a common platform to submit <strong>the</strong> data.The Construction Productivity Centre (CPC) has been carryingout h<strong>and</strong>s-on training for <strong>industry</strong> firms so as to familiarise<strong>the</strong>m with <strong>the</strong> system.“The construction productivity award received strong support from <strong>the</strong><strong>industry</strong> with 85 nominations in its inauguration launch. Consideringthat <strong>the</strong> productivity movement just started about a year ago, this is anencouraging sign that <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> is making some headway inproductivity improvements.”Kevin Wong, Chairman of <strong>the</strong> CPA Assessment CommitteeFacilitating <strong>the</strong> way forward - Building Innovation PanelNew construction methods or products often take time toobtain regulatory clearance from various agencies before<strong>the</strong>y gain <strong>industry</strong> acceptance. To facilitate <strong>the</strong> introductionof productive construction methods <strong>and</strong> products to localconstruction <strong>industry</strong>, <strong>the</strong> inter-agency Buildings InnovationPanel (BIP) was set up in April 2011 to assist firms in receivingfast multiple agency evaluation.Former Senior Minister of State for National Development,Ms Grace Fu, tried her skills at <strong>the</strong> Crane Simulator System| 27 |


BIM, <strong>the</strong> 3D revolutionImagine a world where complex buildings areconstructed quickly, efficiently <strong>and</strong> cost effectively<strong>and</strong> where aes<strong>the</strong>tics <strong>and</strong> construction integrationcome toge<strong>the</strong>r to result in greater productivity gainson-site. These are no longer pipe dreams with <strong>the</strong>use of Building Information Modelling (BIM).BIM has been identified as a key driver to improve <strong>the</strong> levelof integration <strong>and</strong> collaboration across <strong>the</strong> various disciplinesin <strong>the</strong> construction value chain under <strong>the</strong> technologyadoption thrust of <strong>the</strong> Construction Productivity Roadmap.BCA formulated a BIM Roadmap to help steer <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>towards achieving higher productivity <strong>and</strong> more integratedbuilding process. The Roadmap, driven by BCA’s Centre forConstruction IT (CCIT), included strategies to address <strong>the</strong>various challenges faced by <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> in adopting BIM.Lack of dem<strong>and</strong> for BIMPublic sector taking <strong>the</strong> leadRegulatory approvalsChallengesEntrenched in <strong>the</strong> current2D drafting practicesLack of ready pool ofskilled BIM manpowerRemoving impediments(St<strong>and</strong>ards)Building BIMcapability & capacityStrategiesAdditional resources neededto build up BIM expertiseIncentivising BIMadoptersThe International Panel of Experts for BuildingInformation Modelling convened from 31 October to3 November 2011 to deliberate on <strong>the</strong> BIM roadmapA. BIM AdoptionPublic Sector Projects• 6 Government Procurement Entities (GPEs)rolled-out 41 BIM projectsPrivate Sector Projects• Four developers embarked on 6 BIM projectsB. BIM e-submission• Official acceptance of structural, mechanical,electrical <strong>and</strong> plumbing (MEP) BIM e-submissionsfor regulatory approval in April 2011• Published structural <strong>and</strong> MEP BIM e-submissionguidelines <strong>and</strong> templates in April 2011• More than 300 projects submitted in BIMfor regulatory approval| 28 |


D. BIM Outreach• 47 <strong>and</strong> 35 teams took part in <strong>the</strong> inauguralnationwide BIM competition <strong>and</strong> international BIMBuzz@Singapore competition respectively in 2011• More than 925 people participated in <strong>the</strong> variousBIM workshops, conferences <strong>and</strong> seminarsC. BIM Capability& Capacity BuildingBuilding capability• Signed MOU with buildingSMART Korea,buildingSMART Singapore, OpenBIM.info <strong>and</strong> BCAAcademy to promote collaboration on developingBIM training <strong>and</strong> educational programmes• BCA Academy launched <strong>the</strong> Specialist Diploma inBIM in May 2011• BCA Academy launched certification courses in BIMModelling <strong>and</strong> BIM Management in September2011• Provided goodwill chaperon services to more than100 firms in implementing BIMImparting knowledge• BIM workshops <strong>and</strong> BIM e-submission training wereheld for 975 students <strong>and</strong> lecturers from Institutesof Higher Learning (IHL). These included <strong>the</strong> NationalUniversity of Singapore, National Technical University,Temasek Polytechnic <strong>and</strong> Ngee Ann Polytechnic.E. BIM Fund• Launched enhanced BIM Funding in May 2011• Since <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> Fund, more than $4.44million had been awarded to 168 firms tohelp <strong>the</strong>m adopt <strong>the</strong> use of BIM (as of end 2011)F. BIM Steering Committee• Set up <strong>the</strong> BIM Steering Committeeto develop Singapore BIM Guide<strong>and</strong> Legal & Contractual Framework| 29 |


An eye on qualityQuality can be an elusive element. When you feelcomfortable stepping into a building, when yousee that <strong>the</strong> details have been taken care of, whenyou trust implicitly that it is safe <strong>and</strong> well-<strong>built</strong>,those are signs that someone has been watchingout for you.Woh Hup Building received a CONQUAS score of 97.3, <strong>the</strong> highestscore in FY2011Construction Quality Assessment System (CONQUAS ® )BCA introduced CONQUAS ® in 1989 with <strong>the</strong> aim of helping<strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> benchmark <strong>and</strong> improve construction quality.Since <strong>the</strong>n, more than 3,000 projects with a cumulativecontract value exceeding $120 billion have been assessed.This has led to better quality buildings in Singapore <strong>and</strong> over<strong>the</strong> years, <strong>the</strong> average CONQUAS ® scores have rose to apeak of 85.7 <strong>and</strong> an all-time high score of 97.3 for acommercial project in FY2011. BCA has trained more than500 managers <strong>and</strong> supervisors under <strong>the</strong> certifiedCONQUAS/QM (Quality Mark) Managers course. This is partof <strong>the</strong> Quality Masterplan to build up expertise in <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.Going forward, more will be done to recognise <strong>the</strong> role ofsuch individuals in contributing to quality st<strong>and</strong>ards.Despite not being a m<strong>and</strong>atory requirement, CONQUAS ®continued to enjoy high dem<strong>and</strong> with developers <strong>and</strong>builders. In FY2011, 95% (by contract value) of privateresidential <strong>and</strong> commercial projects in Singapore werecommitted for CONQUAS ® assessment.It is <strong>the</strong>refore not surprising that CONQUAS ® is very muchsought after internationally as a benchmarking tool forquality. Although Malaysia, Hong Kong SAR <strong>and</strong> SouthKorea have also adopted quality assessment systems basedon CONQUAS ® , overseas dem<strong>and</strong> for CONQUAS ® , especiallyfrom Malaysia, continue to be strong. It is often promotedby Singaporean developers, contractors <strong>and</strong> consultantsventuring overseas as it comm<strong>and</strong>s a premium due to thisbr<strong>and</strong>ing.“CONQUAS ® is unique. In this vein, itdoesn’t have its equivalent elsewherein international construction, promotednationwide.”Oliver-Marie Racine, Chief Executive Officer,Bouygues Batiment InternationalWith CONQUAS, our<strong>industry</strong> is able tobenchmark <strong>and</strong> improve onconstruction quality| 30 |


Shelford Suites, a QM-certified project, received a CONQUAS score of 96.5, <strong>the</strong> highest for residential buildings in FY2011Feel assured - Quality Mark for Good WorkmanshipSchemeWe introduced <strong>the</strong> BCA Quality Mark (QM) for GoodWorkmanship scheme in 2002 to help meet <strong>the</strong> risingexpectations of homeowners for high quality homes.Over <strong>the</strong> last few years, <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> voluntary QMscheme has been rising. A record 9,410 private residentialunits launched in Singapore were committed to <strong>the</strong> QMscheme in FY2011. This is about one in two units of privateresidential units launched for sale.Leveraging on IT, one key initiative was <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong>CQM On-Line system on 1 August 2011. Builders can nowrequest for CONQUAS ® /QM assessments online anytimewith instant confirmation <strong>and</strong> are kept updated on anychanges. Building on <strong>the</strong> success of this system, <strong>the</strong>CONQUAS ® e-Application system was successfully launchedon 1 February <strong>2012</strong> to enable applications to be madeelectronically, 24/7.Over <strong>the</strong> years, <strong>the</strong> BCA Quality Mark has been gainingground as a mark of assurance. As dem<strong>and</strong> increases, wewill continue to build on <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>’s feedback to innovate,improve our accessibility <strong>and</strong> raise <strong>the</strong> level of service to ourcustomers.“CapitaL<strong>and</strong> firmly believes that <strong>the</strong> Quality Mark Scheme will set a highst<strong>and</strong>ard of quality workmanship for residential developments in Singapore.We share a similar vision with BCA towards building premier homes forSingapore’s sophisticated homebuyers. We <strong>the</strong>refore strongly welcome <strong>the</strong>scheme <strong>and</strong> we will give it our full support.”Wong Heang Fine, Chief Executive Officer, CapitaL<strong>and</strong> Residential Singapore Private Limited| 31 |


Laying <strong>the</strong>groundworkStrategic construction materials,foreign workers’ dormitories,market monitoring, procurementframework. These are necessaryfunctions to ensure <strong>the</strong> cogs canturn smoothly for <strong>the</strong> constructionsector to thrive.To ensure a resilient supply of quality aggregates to <strong>the</strong> construction<strong>industry</strong>, we implemented <strong>the</strong> Importers’ Licensing Scheme in April2011, requiring all aggregates importers to be licensedForeign workers’ dormitoriesTo ease <strong>the</strong> tight supply of bed spaces for <strong>the</strong> housing offoreign construction workers, 10 new dormitories overseenby us were completed <strong>and</strong> opened for occupation in FY2011,which added 27,930 new beds. In total, we oversee 26dormitories (102,628 beds).Monitoring <strong>the</strong> marketTo facilitate resource planning, we have been providingtimely <strong>and</strong> relevant construction information to <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.Since 2011, we enhanced <strong>the</strong> provision of information byproviding a three-year precast construction dem<strong>and</strong> forecaston a rolling basis in view that <strong>the</strong> use of precast concreteis one of <strong>the</strong> key means to raise constructionproductivity. 2011 also saw <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> Census of <strong>the</strong>Construction Industry, which covered about 19,000construction enterprises <strong>and</strong> aimed to obtain morecomprehensive data to monitor <strong>the</strong> performance of <strong>the</strong>construction sector.Ano<strong>the</strong>r milestone in 2011 was <strong>the</strong> completion of <strong>the</strong>st<strong>and</strong>ardisation of M&E phraseology cum development ofst<strong>and</strong>ard tender schedules for M&E works. This initiativewas a joint-<strong>industry</strong> effort which entailed significantcontributions from key <strong>industry</strong> players, including Langdon& Seah Singapore Pte Ltd <strong>and</strong> key M&E consultants.Procurement framework improvementsIn order to incentivise companies for <strong>the</strong>ir efforts in improvingproductivity, <strong>the</strong> tender evaluation framework used by <strong>the</strong>government - namely <strong>the</strong> Quality-Fee-Method (QFM) <strong>and</strong>Price-Quality-Method (PQM) - will introduce a newquality attribute that measures productivityimprovements. Consultants achieving higher Buildable DesignScores in <strong>the</strong>ir past projects will be given higher qualitypoints during tender evaluations. Similarly, contractors willbe given higher quality points if <strong>the</strong>y can achieve higherConstructability Scores in <strong>the</strong>ir past projects.The registration systems under <strong>the</strong> procurement frameworkfor public construction projects have also been enhancedto build up <strong>the</strong> capability of <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.| 32 |


SAVING GAIAAs part of <strong>the</strong> global community, Singapore mustplay its role to reduce <strong>the</strong> overall carbon footprint.This is also in line with our national objective toachieve a 35% improvement in energy intensityfrom 2005 levels by 2030. To this end, we aim toachieve a sustainable <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> by workingclosely with <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> to incorporate bestpractices in <strong>environment</strong>al design <strong>and</strong> construction,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> adoption of green building technologies.The signing of <strong>the</strong> MOU between BCA <strong>and</strong> UNEP formalises <strong>the</strong>cooperation to provide policy advice <strong>and</strong> outreach activities relatedto sustainable resource management in <strong>the</strong> building sectorBuilding expertiseThe national target to “green” at least 80% of all buildingsin Singapore by 2030 was set in 2008. The green buildingmovement has come a long way since its inception, with1,181 green buildings as of 31 March <strong>2012</strong>. This translatesto about 36.6 million m 2 of Gross Floor Area (or 15.9% of<strong>the</strong> total Gross Floor Area) in Singapore. Legislation was putin place in 2008 for new buildings to meet <strong>the</strong> minimum<strong>environment</strong>al sustainability st<strong>and</strong>ard, <strong>and</strong> our focus nowis to green <strong>the</strong> existing building stock.On <strong>the</strong> international front, we have also joined forces with<strong>the</strong> United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) to setup <strong>the</strong> BCA Centre for Sustainability in <strong>the</strong> fight againstclimate change. A first in Asia <strong>and</strong> one of <strong>the</strong> few collaboratingcentres with UNEP, <strong>the</strong> centre’s aim is to develop tools <strong>and</strong>approaches, as well as provide support to regional countriesin a coordinated effort to elevate sustainable solutions in<strong>the</strong> building sector.“We are very pleased to formallyestablish BCA's Centre forSustainable Buildings as a centrecollaborating with UNEP. Access toBCA's expertise <strong>and</strong> regionalnetwork will broaden our collectiveability to not only widen adoptionof sustainable building policies in<strong>the</strong> region through outreach <strong>and</strong>awareness, but will also exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>research <strong>and</strong> analysis needed toestablish baselines, facilitate bestpractices <strong>and</strong> look more specificallyat <strong>the</strong> unique aspects of sustainablebuilding in tropical countries.”Dr Arab Hoballah, Chief of UNEP's SustainableConsumption <strong>and</strong> Production Branch| 33 |


“We believe that <strong>the</strong> approachwe have taken to shape asustainable <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>in Singapore is one that canbe reproduced around <strong>the</strong>globe. That is why we arealways pleased to share <strong>the</strong>Singapore formula withgovernment authorities <strong>and</strong>non-governmentalorganisations that are keen toaccelerate <strong>the</strong> green buildingmovement in <strong>the</strong>ir cities.”Dr John Keung, Chief Executive Officer,Building <strong>and</strong> Construction AuthorityPasir Ris residents celebrated Singapore's 1000 th Green Mark building projectduring a 'Walk <strong>the</strong> Green Talk' eventInternational recognitionIn December 2011, we were conferred <strong>the</strong> inaugural RegionalLeadership Awards, one of <strong>the</strong> six World Green BuildingCouncil Government Leadership Awards. This recognised ourefforts in showing <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> <strong>the</strong> way forward by not justunderst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> private sector conditions, but also takingon <strong>the</strong> leadership role to get <strong>the</strong> public sector to go green.Making <strong>the</strong> markSince <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> BCA Green Mark scheme in 2005,we have been working with countries such as China <strong>and</strong>Bahrain to develop local green building capabilities in <strong>the</strong>irrespective countries. The BCA Green Mark scheme has nowbeen used or adapted for use in more than 10 countriesincluding China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Brunei, India, Thail<strong>and</strong>,Indonesia, <strong>the</strong> Philippines <strong>and</strong> Tanzania.“The World Green Building Council’s ‘Regional Leadership Award’ recognises<strong>the</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing vision <strong>and</strong> commitment of Singapore’s Building <strong>and</strong> ConstructionAuthority. We congratulate <strong>the</strong> Singapore Government for developing aMasterplan that sets minimum <strong>environment</strong>al st<strong>and</strong>ards for building codes,provides incentives for <strong>the</strong> private sector <strong>and</strong> promotes research, development<strong>and</strong> capacity building. Singapore’s achievements clearly demonstrate that greenbuildings are not only achievable, but also affordable <strong>and</strong> practical.”Jane Henley, Chief Executive Officer, World Green Building Council Quote from WGBC for <strong>the</strong> award| 34 |


At <strong>the</strong> BCA breakfast talk for CEOs,eight leading developers <strong>and</strong> buildingowners signed <strong>the</strong> Green Pledge toshow <strong>the</strong>ir commitment to attainhigher energy efficiency for <strong>the</strong>irexisting buildings through <strong>the</strong> BCAGreen Mark certification by 2020Build Green. Act Now.The third Singapore Green Building Week was organised inSeptember 2011.During <strong>the</strong> week, we also held a breakfast talk for morethan 180 influencers <strong>and</strong> decision-makers <strong>and</strong> announced<strong>the</strong> results of a joint study with NUS which showed thatretrofitting commercial buildings can lead to an increase in<strong>the</strong>ir property values. The study found that with an averageexpected savings in operating expenses of 10% as a resultof green building retrofits, commercial buildings could reapan increase in capital value of about 2%.Cultivating consciousnessWe champion <strong>the</strong> development of a holistic <strong>and</strong> integratedapproach to sustainable building through various incentives<strong>and</strong> educational programmes. We held eight rovingexhibitions to-date, which reached out to 81,000 heartl<strong>and</strong>ersalong <strong>the</strong> way. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> “Build it Green” (or BiGClub) was launched in 2011 with <strong>the</strong> aim of nurturing greenbuilding youth ambassadors.Senior Parliamentary Secretary for National Development,Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman, officially opened <strong>the</strong> SingaporeGreen Building Week 2011 in SeptemberA youth ambassador from <strong>the</strong> BiG Club spread <strong>the</strong> green messageat BCA’s Green Building Roving Exhibition| 35 |


We can do anything ifwe put our minds <strong>and</strong>hearts toge<strong>the</strong>r. Byforging partnerships,investing in research<strong>and</strong> raising awareness,we can re-invent <strong>the</strong><strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> intoone that is sustainable<strong>and</strong> inclusive – one thatwe can be proud tocall home.Re:Invent| 36 |


| 37 |


“A transition to a Green Economywill partly depend on sectors likebuilding <strong>and</strong> construction investingin innovation that catalyses lowcarbon technologies <strong>and</strong> practices,as well as contributing to moresustainable working. I congratulate<strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> ConstructionAuthority of Singapore on itsforesight in taking a leading role,<strong>and</strong> UNEP looks forward to workingtoge<strong>the</strong>r.”UNEP’s Executive Director <strong>and</strong> United NationsUnder-Secretary-General Dr Achim SteinerGuiding <strong>the</strong> way forward with <strong>the</strong> Green BuildingResearch & Development (R&D) FrameworkBCA leads an inter-agency Green Building R&D Workgroup,comprising key agencies such as MND, HDB, URA, A*STAR,EDB, JTC, EMA, NEA, NParks, IDA <strong>and</strong> SPRING, to champion<strong>and</strong> coordinate green building R&D. The Workgroupdeveloped <strong>the</strong> Green Building R&D Framework to determine<strong>the</strong> scope of green building R&D. It serves as a guide forR&D grant calls on green buildings, focusing on developinghigh-impact <strong>and</strong> cost-effective solutions for green buildingsin <strong>the</strong> tropics.Establishing <strong>the</strong> A*STAR-MND grant callIn addition, we established a Public Private Partnership (PPP)model for R&D collaboration. We worked closely with MND<strong>and</strong> A*STAR to roll out a pilot joint grant call for greenbuildings in April 2011. The PPP approach encouraged<strong>industry</strong> <strong>and</strong> research institutes to collaborate <strong>and</strong> submitjoint R&D proposals <strong>and</strong> such collaborations ensured that<strong>the</strong> solutions developed also addressed challenges faced by<strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>. A total of $9 million was awarded to nineresearch projects in <strong>the</strong> areas of energy efficiency <strong>and</strong>building facade materials.The R&D Congress held in June 2011 promotes greater awareness<strong>and</strong> encourage fur<strong>the</strong>r collaboration between researchers, agencies<strong>and</strong> <strong>industry</strong> on Green Building R&DEncouraging greater energy efficiency with <strong>the</strong> GreenMark Incentive SchemeThe Green Mark Incentive Scheme - Design Prototype (GMIS- DP) was launched in December 2010 to encouragedevelopers <strong>and</strong> building owners to strive for greater energyefficiency in buildings by taking an integrated designapproach early at <strong>the</strong> planning stage. So far, two projects– JEM at Jurong Gateway <strong>and</strong> JTC’s Clean Tech Park Two– had been awarded funding support of about $1millionunder <strong>the</strong> GMIS – DP scheme.| 38 |


BCA’s Zero Energy Building has achieved netzero status for more than two <strong>and</strong> a halfyears since operationZero Energy BuildingA new testbed at BCA’s Zero Energy Building won <strong>the</strong> AseanEnergy Award recently <strong>and</strong> generated interests for possibleadoption at a new NTU facility. The Passive DisplacementVentilation system presents an innovative technology tocool buildings at substantially reduced electricity consumptionwithout <strong>the</strong> hefty re-construction <strong>and</strong> capital costs.ZEB continues to attract interest from SMEs <strong>and</strong> largecompanies who want to collaborate <strong>and</strong> work on research<strong>and</strong> testbedding projects. Technology test beds in <strong>the</strong> pipelineinclude <strong>the</strong> ‘Inflector’ which is a material developed byNASA for space travel <strong>and</strong> is now incorporated in windowblinds to shield <strong>the</strong> building from solar heat gain.Reaching out to moreBCA’s 2nd International Green Building Conference (IGBC)took place from 13–16 September 2011 during <strong>the</strong> SingaporeGreen Building Week (SGBW). It saw <strong>the</strong> participation ofclose to 1,000 delegates from over 32 countries. IGBC 2011was a unique 7-in-1 event with symposiums by local <strong>and</strong>international partners such as <strong>the</strong> United Nations EnvironmentProgramme (UNEP), World Green Building Council (WGBC),China Green Building Council (China GBC), <strong>and</strong> SingaporeGreen Building Council (SGBC).ZEB has also achieved <strong>the</strong> net zero status for more than 2.5years <strong>and</strong> has to-date attracted about 15,000 visitorsincluding Ministers from Brunei, Jamaica, Malaysia <strong>and</strong>many o<strong>the</strong>r dignitaries.Financing capability developmentAs of end FY2011, 44 projects had been awarded with atotal committed funding of $4 million under <strong>the</strong> $15 millionSustainable Construction Fund. One such project was <strong>the</strong>Tiong Seng Prefab Hub where <strong>the</strong> Fund was used to upgrade<strong>the</strong> concrete batching facilities in Tiong Seng’s Prefab Hubto produce more green concrete.Senior Minister of State for National Development launched <strong>the</strong>International Green Building Conference in September 2011BCA held eight Green BuildingRoving Exhibitions to creategreater awareness of <strong>the</strong> greenbuilding movement| 39 |


The Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Cooperation Agreements signing ceremony to jointly develop <strong>the</strong> Low Carbon Living LabSpreading our wingsWe could all use a little help, especially whennavigating in unfamiliar territories. To this end,BCA actively promotes <strong>and</strong> supports our localconstruction-related firms so that <strong>the</strong>y can ventureoverseas.Going globalBCA, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>, participated in overseasexhibitions to raise our international profile <strong>and</strong> showcaseour local companies’ products <strong>and</strong> services. We also marketedBCA’s services overseas, such as <strong>the</strong> Green Building TrainingProgramme <strong>and</strong> Green Mark certification, as well as facilitated<strong>the</strong> 3rd run of green building training for Tianjin Eco-city.BCA fur<strong>the</strong>r extended <strong>the</strong> programme <strong>and</strong> introduced it to<strong>the</strong> Qinhuangdao government.The International Green Building Conference was one platformthat encouraged fur<strong>the</strong>r collaboration between local <strong>and</strong>international stakeholders including researchers, governmentagencies <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> on green building R&DBCA also took <strong>the</strong> lead in developing green building <strong>and</strong>green district st<strong>and</strong>ards for <strong>the</strong> Sino-Singapore GuangzhouKnowledge City.Forging partnershipsFour Memor<strong>and</strong>ums of Underst<strong>and</strong>ing (MOUs) <strong>and</strong> serviceagreements were signed with five cities in China in FY2011.These paved <strong>the</strong> way for our companies to venture into<strong>the</strong>se emerging markets. Local firms are following up with<strong>the</strong> project leads derived from <strong>the</strong> MOUs.| 40 |


An MOU was signed between BCA <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> Zhaoqing Municipal People’sGovernment to collaborate on areas suchas eco-district conceptualisation, sharingof experience <strong>and</strong> expertise, <strong>and</strong> green<strong>industry</strong> capability developmentMemor<strong>and</strong>ums of Underst<strong>and</strong>ing (MOUs) signed with Chinese cities in FY2011• Beijing Construction Decoration Association Collaboration Projects MOU• Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Investment & Development Co. Ltd. <strong>and</strong> International Entreprise SingaporeTianjin Eco-city Low Carbon Living Lab MOU• Changzhi Municipal People’s Government Collaboration Projects MOU• Zhaoqing Municipal People’s Government Collaboration Framework MOUWe also actively sourced for project leads <strong>and</strong> assisted localfirms in clinching projects in China, India <strong>and</strong> Indonesia lastyear. In 2011, <strong>the</strong> local construction consulting firms wona total of 201 projects overseas.Our building <strong>and</strong> infrastructure contractors were alsosuccessful in l<strong>and</strong>ing projects overseas in spite of <strong>the</strong> strongconstruction dem<strong>and</strong> in Singapore. In 2011 <strong>the</strong>y clincheda total of $1.2 billion worth of construction projects spanningover 23 countries.Sharing knowledgeApart from project sourcing <strong>and</strong> facilitation, we also sharedwith our local firms <strong>the</strong> intricacies of doing business invarious countries. In July 2011, we held a seminar on doingbusiness in <strong>the</strong> Middle East. We also worked with Singaporeplanning firms, green consultants <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r service providersto bring <strong>the</strong> Sino-Singapore Green Building Forum Seriesto three cities in China – Taiyuan, Kunming <strong>and</strong> Zhaoqing.Singapore – a green building technology hubTo raise awareness <strong>and</strong> profile Singapore as a regional hubfor green building technologies (GBT), we worked with <strong>the</strong>Singapore Green Building Council (SGBC) to set up aSingapore Pavilion at <strong>the</strong> International Green <strong>and</strong> EnergyefficientBuilding Conference (IGEBC) in March <strong>2012</strong> inBeijing. Additionally, we also organised a forum to shareour green journey, Green Mark scheme <strong>and</strong> best practiceswith attendees.In FY2011, a total of 238 high profile foreign delegationsvisited BCA <strong>and</strong> were hosted <strong>and</strong> briefed on BCA’s variousinitiatives. They also went on guided tours of BCA’s ZeroEnergy Building (ZEB) <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r BCA-certified green buildings.The Singapore Green Pavilionat <strong>the</strong> International Green <strong>and</strong>Energy-efficient BuildingConference| 41 |


Lush gardens with greenery, play areas for kids, spacious courtyards <strong>and</strong> serene eco ponds provide a conducive <strong>environment</strong> for groupsof all ages to enjoy <strong>and</strong> relaxCreating an inclusive <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>At BCA, we do our best to create a city for all ages, because everyone has a right tocomfortable surroundings. To this end, we continuously seek improvements to enhance <strong>the</strong><strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> to make it a great place for you to live, work <strong>and</strong> play in.We introduced a five-year Accessibility Masterplan in 2006to support an inclusive society <strong>and</strong> “ageing-in-place” in aholistic manner through collaboration with different publicagencies <strong>and</strong> stakeholders.By end of March <strong>2012</strong>, <strong>the</strong>se are <strong>the</strong> achievements:• close to 100% of <strong>the</strong> public sector buildings frequentedby members of <strong>the</strong> public had achieved at least basicbarrier-free accessibility• The Orchard Road shopping belt has also achieved atleast basic barrier-free accessibility for 88% of <strong>the</strong>buildings• 102 applicants had benefitted from <strong>the</strong> AccessibilityFund which helped to defray <strong>the</strong> cost of barrier-freeaccessibility upgradingBCA also cultivated <strong>the</strong> younger generation to appreciate<strong>the</strong> concept of UD <strong>and</strong> barrier-free accessibility, under <strong>the</strong>‘nurturing <strong>the</strong> young’ programme. Since 2007, 71 internsin 30 batches from Institutes of Higher Learning have joinedBCA to participate in accessibility audits on buildings.To encourage <strong>and</strong> recognise building owners <strong>and</strong> designersfor adopting UD concepts in <strong>the</strong>ir buildings, BCA has conferreda total of 52 Universal Design Awards since its conception.Outreach <strong>and</strong> capability buildingWe put up comprehensive promotional <strong>and</strong> educationalprogrammes to reach out to <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> <strong>and</strong> stakeholders.Roving exhibitions, dialogues <strong>and</strong> community outreachsessions were carried out at a total of 43 venues such aslibraries, schools <strong>and</strong> community centres over <strong>the</strong> past fiveyears. The BCA Friendly Built Environment Portal(www.friendlybuildings.sg) currently features over 2,400buildings rated with different levels of accessibility underour Accessibility Rating System (ARS).About 88% of <strong>the</strong> buildings along Orchard Road have achievedat least basic barrier-free accessibility| 42 |


From 28-30 March <strong>2012</strong>, an International Panel of Experts(IPE) on UD convened in Singapore for <strong>the</strong> second time toreview <strong>the</strong> progress of our Accessibility Masterplan <strong>and</strong>challenges faced in driving <strong>the</strong> adoption of UD. Theirrecommendations are currently being considered for in <strong>the</strong>review of <strong>the</strong> Accessibility Masterplan.Key recommendations from <strong>the</strong> InternationalPanel of Experts on UD• Making business sense of UD, to helpenterprises look beyond upfront costs <strong>and</strong>underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> value of UD. This is in view of arapidly ageing global population, where UD canenable greater inclusiveness in <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong><strong>environment</strong>.• Taking a multi-pronged approach in tacklingexisting buildings, which uses capital incentives,education <strong>and</strong> possibly legislation as <strong>the</strong> lastoption. The urgency arises from <strong>the</strong> expectationthat <strong>the</strong> number of elderly above 65 in Singaporeis expected to reach 20% in 2030.• Raising awareness <strong>and</strong> building capabilitiesthrough education <strong>and</strong> public outreachefforts to achieve buy-in from <strong>the</strong> community.The Panel recommended various targeted trainingefforts for young children, tertiary students,design professionals, developers <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rrelevant stakeholders. Social media can alsocomplement existing public outreach efforts toachieve buy-in from <strong>the</strong> community.• Consulting users in <strong>the</strong> application of UDsince UD concerns users. Both users <strong>and</strong> expertsshould be consulted to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fullspectrum of users’ needs <strong>and</strong> preferences. Forexisting developments, <strong>the</strong> Panel endorsed <strong>the</strong>methodology of conducting audits of existingfacilities <strong>and</strong> soliciting user feedback to identifyneeds <strong>and</strong> suggest improvements.“BCA is making excellent progress in<strong>the</strong> promotion <strong>and</strong> delivery of UniversalDesign in Singapore. The level ofimprovements that have been made todate in providing lift accessibility <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r improvements to high riseresidential accommodation is a clear<strong>and</strong> significant testament to <strong>the</strong>seriousness of BCA’s commitment toproviding residential places <strong>and</strong> spacesthat enhance <strong>the</strong> quality of life <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>opportunities available to <strong>the</strong> peopleof Singapore.”Prof Keith Bright, Director, Keith Bright Consultants,United Kingdom| 43 |


Re:Vitalise| 44 |


We need to take boldsteps to start reshaping<strong>the</strong> construction <strong>industry</strong>fundamentally, <strong>and</strong>through <strong>the</strong>se efforts,enhance <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>’simage.| 45 |


The <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> <strong>industry</strong> has ushered in anexciting <strong>and</strong> transformative era. As we push forincreasingly sustainable <strong>and</strong> productive design<strong>and</strong> construction practices, as well as a morecompetent, innovative <strong>and</strong> skilled workforce, wealso need to ensure that <strong>the</strong>se advancements <strong>and</strong>breakthroughs portray <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> in its best light.Three new manpower development programmes – DiplomaScholarship, Diploma Sponsorship <strong>and</strong> Apprenticeship - werelaunched in <strong>the</strong> second half of 2011To enhance <strong>the</strong> appeal of our <strong>industry</strong>, particularly to <strong>the</strong>younger generation, we progressively stepped up our effortsby leveraging on opportunities offered by emergingdevelopments such as <strong>the</strong> green building movement <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> push for Building Information Modelling technology.• BCA conducted a pilot run of <strong>the</strong> Job ShadowingProgramme in November 2011 to fur<strong>the</strong>r engage <strong>and</strong>inspire Junior College students in pursuing <strong>built</strong><strong>environment</strong> courses <strong>and</strong> subsequently careers in <strong>the</strong><strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>.• To fur<strong>the</strong>r boost our ongoing endeavours in attractingmore young talents <strong>and</strong> new entrants at <strong>the</strong> technical,supervisory <strong>and</strong> foreman level, we launched three newmanpower development programmes – DiplomaScholarship, Diploma Sponsorship <strong>and</strong> Apprenticeshipin <strong>the</strong> second half of 2011.The 2011 BCA-Industry Built Environment undergraduate scholars| 46 |


Multi-skilled workers offer greater flexibility in deployment on site <strong>and</strong> help to enhance productivity by reducing productivity downtimeRaising workforce skills <strong>and</strong> qualityAgainst a backdrop of strong construction dem<strong>and</strong>, a keyingredient to raise construction productivity is to continuallyimprove <strong>the</strong> quality of our workforce.We introduced a new Multi-skilling scheme, which registersworkers who are skilled in more than one constructiontrades. Such multi-skilled workers would offer greaterflexibility in deployment on site <strong>and</strong> help to enhanceproductivity by reducing downtime.Onwards <strong>and</strong> upwards - Enhancing CoreTradeIn addition, <strong>the</strong> enhanced CoreTrade scheme was launched.It allows more skilled <strong>and</strong> experienced construction workersto progress from general workers to registered tradesmenspecialising in specific trades, to registered foremen <strong>and</strong>eventually registered construction supervisors.“By mapping out a clear career progression path for <strong>the</strong> students, <strong>the</strong> programmesgive an extra nudge for students to seriously consider pursuing a career in <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong><strong>environment</strong>. These manpower development programmes will also certainly benefitprogressive firms that take a long-term view on <strong>the</strong> value of a quality <strong>and</strong> competentworkforce, which is <strong>the</strong> cornerstone of a technologically advanced sector.”Er. Ho Siong Hin (Immediate Past President of <strong>the</strong> Institution of Engineers Singapore)| 47 |


Students <strong>and</strong> working professionalsalike have gained <strong>the</strong> skill sets <strong>the</strong>yneed to carve out a niche in <strong>the</strong><strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> <strong>industry</strong> withBCA AcademyBCA AcademyGrooming <strong>the</strong> talents of tomorrowOur training arm, <strong>the</strong> BCA Academy, has been grooming talent for <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>industry</strong> since itsinception in 1984. To ensure that <strong>the</strong> skills <strong>and</strong> expertise to shape a safe, high quality, sustainable <strong>and</strong>friendly <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> are always relevant, <strong>the</strong> Academy consistently rolls out new courses <strong>and</strong>programmes to cater to <strong>the</strong> changing needs of <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>. Students <strong>and</strong> working professionals alikehave gained <strong>the</strong> skill sets <strong>the</strong>y need to carve out a niche in <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.Sharpening mindsIn 2011, BCA Academy trained a pool of 11,600 PMETs through various professional <strong>and</strong> executive trainingprogrammes <strong>and</strong> 2,500 students through academic programmes ranging from Diplomas to Postgraduate Degreeprogrammes, including 1,200 full-time students. We also trained over 25,000 rank & file personnel under supervisory<strong>and</strong> craftsmen skills training programmes. A new Diploma in Geospatial Information <strong>and</strong> Technology was alsointroduced to build a pipeline of qualified l<strong>and</strong> surveyors.Building Capability to Enhance Productivity & SafetySeveral new programmes were rolled out over <strong>the</strong> yearincluding:• SMU-BCA-WDA Productivity <strong>and</strong> LeadershipDevelopment Programme• UniSIM-BCA Bachelor of Building <strong>and</strong> ProjectManagement• Specialist Diploma in Building Information Modelling(BIM)• Certificate in Construction Productivity Management(jointly with SCAL)Honing SkillsThe Centre for Construction Skills Training (CCST), locatedat <strong>the</strong> BCA Academy, offers a suite of over 40 trade skillstraining <strong>and</strong> certification courses which are well-recognised,both locally <strong>and</strong> overseas. The Crane Simulator Centre wasset up in 2011 to provide quality training courses bysimulating different scenarios that might not be possible ina real-life <strong>environment</strong>.Going regionalTo transform <strong>the</strong> BCA Academy into a premium regionaltraining institute of <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Academyruns customised training programmes for overseasgovernment officials <strong>and</strong> professionals. To date, over 1,000Cambodian government officials have been trained through<strong>the</strong>se customised programmes.| 48 |


Corporate MattersPeople are key to our successThe capability of <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> competency of staff are two key factors that are crucial to oursuccess. By developing our human capital, we ensure that our people are equipped to develop <strong>and</strong>carry out initiatives that will push <strong>the</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> sector to <strong>the</strong> next level.Our HR strategies• Build expertise in core mission areas• Develop motivated <strong>and</strong> healthy workforce• Develop staff to full potential• Develop customer-centric workforceWorking toge<strong>the</strong>rFor a plan to work, everyone has to work towards a commongoal. To this end, we equip our staff with relevant skill setsin order to meet <strong>the</strong> ever-evolving challenges. We take pridein our human capital initiatives, which comprise <strong>the</strong> TalentManagement Programme (TMP), Core CompetencyProgramme (CCP) <strong>and</strong> Staff Development Programme.The programmes are supported by five developmentalplatforms: job rotation, secondments/external attachments,scholarships/sponsorships, specialised training/milestoneprogrammes <strong>and</strong> structured exposure.Let’s talkOur senior management also regularly engages staff onissues relating to organisation excellence through variousactivities <strong>and</strong> programmes. These include annual staff events,informal engagement sessions, intranet interviews, functionaltrainings <strong>and</strong> mentorship by senior management.We careWith aspirations to be an employer of choice, we arecommitted to developing a motivated <strong>and</strong> healthy workforce.In 2011, we introduced <strong>the</strong> Blue Sky Friday initiative toencourage our officers to leave <strong>the</strong> office on time at 5.30pmon Fridays to spend time with <strong>the</strong>ir family.O<strong>the</strong>r initiatives introduced over <strong>the</strong> past year include <strong>the</strong>two-day eldercare leave, half-day childcare leave, as well as<strong>the</strong> enhancement of on-site health services under <strong>the</strong> Health& Sports Programme.Ms Tay Ah Ching, BCA’s Principal Engineer from <strong>the</strong> BuildingEngineering Group, went on a six-week sabbatical attachmentwith an <strong>industry</strong> firm to keep abreast of <strong>the</strong> latest technologiesused in <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong>| 49 |


Over <strong>the</strong> past year, we continued our efforts in hosting blood donation drives, fundraising for charity, coastal clean-ups <strong>and</strong> doing volunteer workWe also believe in doing our part for <strong>the</strong> <strong>environment</strong> <strong>and</strong> society. Over <strong>the</strong> past year, we continued our efforts in hostingblood donation drives, fundraising for charity, coastal clean-ups <strong>and</strong> doing volunteer work.Recognition of our effortsWe were rewarded for our constant efforts to push for organisational excellence last year when we received <strong>the</strong> SingaporeQuality Class (Star) <strong>and</strong> Service Class as well as renewed <strong>the</strong> Innovation Class certifications. Since <strong>the</strong>n, we have steppedup our game <strong>and</strong> are working toward attaining <strong>the</strong> prestigious Singapore Quality Award.Our key international awards <strong>and</strong> accolades over <strong>the</strong> past year include:Innovation Excellence• World Green Building Council Regional Leadership Award for Excellence in City Policy for Green Building• Asean Energy Awards 2011 (for Zero Energy Building or ZEB)• Asian Green City Index 2011 (Singapore is 1st for overall <strong>environment</strong>al performance in APEC)• Solidiance survey (Singapore is 1st for green building policies in Asia in 2011)Service Excellence• The World Bank opinion survey (Singapore is <strong>the</strong> fastest in issuing construction permits in world from 2010-12)• The World Bank opinion survey (Singapore is <strong>the</strong> most business-friendly economy in <strong>the</strong> world 2010-<strong>2012</strong>)• PS21 Service Award Winners• Singapore Service ClassOrganisational & Innovation Excellence• Singapore Quality Class Star• Singapore Innovation Class• National Innovation & Quality Circles (IQC) Star Awards 2011• Minister for National Development’s R&D Award (Distinguished) 2011 (for ZEB)People Excellence• Singapore Health Award (Platinum, 2008-<strong>2012</strong>)Looking ahead, we will continue to explore more ways to lay a strong foundation for our staff to continue <strong>the</strong>ir goodwork. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, we can create <strong>the</strong> best <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> for Singapore.| 50 |


AcknowledgementsBCA would like to thank <strong>the</strong> following organisations for <strong>the</strong>ir participation <strong>and</strong> assistance in <strong>the</strong> photoshoots:CapitaL<strong>and</strong> LimitedInternational Cruise TerminalLum Chang HoldingsPenta-Ocean Construction Co.,LtdUnited World College of South East AsiaWe would also like to thank <strong>the</strong>se BCA colleagues for <strong>the</strong>ir participation <strong>and</strong> assistance in <strong>the</strong> photoshoots:Alex TanBernard TanCharles SohChin Leong SiongDr Eric OngEzrin RaofGoh Koon YangJosephine SeetIgnatius IgnatiusLetchimi PalanisamyLim Kay BengNg Kok LamSherlyn YapWong-Ling Yuet ChunWong Siew HengYau Yen Nee| 51 |


BCA FINANCIAL REPORT2011/<strong>2012</strong>


FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARYThe GroupFINANCIAL RESULTS 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong>S$’ 000 S$’ 000 S$’ 000 S$’ 000 S$’ 000Operating income 102,011 133,182 103,763 122,495 152,946Operating expenditure 83,453 94,774 101,820 122,458 148,855Net operating surplus 18,558 38,408 1,943 37 4,091Non-operating income 5,936 2,353 1,601 1,349 1,766Surplus beforegovernment grants 24,494 40,761 3,544 1,386 5,857Government grants 25,772 30,551 34,878 41,206 43,568Surplus before contribution toconsolidated fund 50,266 71,312 38,422 42,592 49,425Donations (3) (6) (2) (3) (3)Contribution to consolidated fund (9,031) (12,798) (6,472) (7,192) (8,315)Income tax expense (8) (18) (33) (24) (57)Surplus for <strong>the</strong> year 41,224 58,490 31,915 35,373 41,0506058.4950Surplus (S$Million)40302041.2218.5638.4131.9235.3741.051001.940.044.092007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong>Surplus for <strong>the</strong> yearNet operating surplus[ 02 ]


FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY (continued)FINANCIAL POSITIONThe Group2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong>S$' 000 S$' 000 S$' 000 S$' 000 S$' 000Property, Plant <strong>and</strong> Equipment 30,009 33,424 38,707 35,003 34,910Current Assets 141,906 205,023 225,800 271,962 340,235171,915 238,447 264,507 306,965 375,145Capital <strong>and</strong> Reserves 70,932 129,423 161,338 196,711 229,824Current Liabilities 72,488 79,546 69,888 73,873 103,480Non-Current Liabilities 28,495 29,478 33,281 36,381 41,841171,915 238,447 264,507 306,965 375,14540040011%30030012%28%20091%89%20086%85%100 83%100017% 14% 15% 11% 9%017%42%41%12%33%54%13%26%61%24%64%61%2007/20082008/20092009/20102010/20112011/<strong>2012</strong>2007/20082008/20092009/20102010/20112011/<strong>2012</strong>Current AssetsProperty, Plant <strong>and</strong> EquipmentCapital <strong>and</strong> ReservesCurrent LiabilitiesNon-Current Liabilities[ 03 ]


FIVE-YEAR VALUE ADDED STATEMENTThe Group2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong>S$' 000 S$' 000 S$' 000 S$' 000 S$' 000Value Added From:Revenue earned 102,011 133,182 103,763 122,495 152,946Less bought in materials<strong>and</strong> services 29,948 43,394 48,110 52,667 77,912Value Added From Operations 72,063 89,788 55,653 69,828 75,034Government grants 25,772 30,551 34,878 41,206 43,568Interest income 1,949 2,335 1,606 1,407 1,725Reversal of impairment loss 3,974 - - - -Gain/(Loss) on disposal of property,plant <strong>and</strong> equipment 14 18 (5) (58) 41Total Value Added Available ForDistribution 103,772 122,692 92,132 112,383 120,368Distribution:To employeesSalaries <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r staff costs 48,647 46,378 49,103 64,148 64,920To GovernmentContribution to consolidated fund 9,031 12,798 6,472 7,192 8,315Income tax expense 8 18 33 24 57Retained for reinvestment <strong>and</strong>future growthDepreciation 4,862 5,008 4,609 5,646 6,026Surplus 41,224 58,490 31,915 35,373 41,050Total Value Added 103,772 122,692 92,132 112,383 120,368[ 04 ]


FINANCIAL REVIEWFINANCIAL RESULTSOperating income for 2011/<strong>2012</strong> was $30.5M higher than previous year. With higher operating lease expenses, BCA’s net operating surplusfor <strong>the</strong> financial year ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong> was $4.1M, as compared to $37K surplus in <strong>the</strong> previous year.During <strong>the</strong> year, BCA also received government grants of $43.6M. This brought <strong>the</strong> surplus for <strong>the</strong> year to $49.4M, which was $6.8M higherthan <strong>the</strong> previous year. BCA contributed $8.3M to <strong>the</strong> consolidated fund for 2011/<strong>2012</strong>’s surplus.504035.3741.05Surplus (S$Million)3020104.0900.042010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong>Net operating surplusSurplus for <strong>the</strong> year[ 05 ]


FINANCIAL REVIEW (continued)OPERATING INCOMEOperating income comprised mainly plan fees, advertisement licence fees, course fees, quality assessment <strong>and</strong> certification fees, tradetest fees <strong>and</strong> management fees. Operating income increased by $30.5M from 2010/2011 to 2011/<strong>2012</strong> mainly due to an increase inmanagement fees, course fees <strong>and</strong> trade test fees.2010/2011 Operating Income11%24%Plan fees24%3%12%4%Advertisement licence feesCourse feesQuality assessment <strong>and</strong> certification feesTrade test feesContractors registration feesManagement feesO<strong>the</strong>r income13%9%2011/<strong>2012</strong> Operating Income5%21%Plan fees32%4%13%Advertisement licence feesCourse feesQuality assessment <strong>and</strong> certification feesTrade test feesContractors registration feesManagement fees2%14%9%O<strong>the</strong>r income[ 06 ]


FINANCIAL REVIEW (continued)OPERATING EXPENDITUREOperating expenditure, which comprised mainly employee benefit costs, depreciation, operating lease expenses <strong>and</strong> course <strong>and</strong> programmeexpenses, had increased by $26.4M from 2010/2011 to 2011/<strong>2012</strong>. The increase was due to higher operating lease expenses <strong>and</strong> course<strong>and</strong> programme expenses.2010/2011 Operating Expenditure4%7%19%52%Employee benefit costsDepreciation of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipmentCourse <strong>and</strong> programmeOperating lease expensesRepairs <strong>and</strong> maintenance expenses13%O<strong>the</strong>r expenditure5%2011/<strong>2012</strong> Operating Expenditure3%7%29%44%Employee benefit costsDepreciation of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipmentCourse <strong>and</strong> programmeOperating lease expensesRepairs <strong>and</strong> maintenance expensesO<strong>the</strong>r expenditure13%4%[ 07 ]


Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority <strong>and</strong> its subsidiariesREPORT ANDFINANCIAL STATEMENTSYear ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong>


STATEMENT BY THE BOARD OF THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITYIn our opinion:(a)(b)<strong>the</strong> consolidated financial statements of <strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority (<strong>the</strong> “Authority”) <strong>and</strong> its subsidiary (<strong>the</strong> “Group”) asset out on pages 12 to 41 are drawn up so as to present fairly, in all material respects, <strong>the</strong> state of affairs of <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong>Authority as at 31 March <strong>2012</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>and</strong> changes in reserves of <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Authority <strong>and</strong> cash flows of <strong>the</strong> Groupfor <strong>the</strong> year ended on that date in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority Act, Chapter 30A <strong>and</strong>Singapore Statutory Board Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing St<strong>and</strong>ards; <strong>and</strong>at <strong>the</strong> date of this statement, <strong>the</strong>re are reasonable grounds to believe that <strong>the</strong> Authority will be able to pay its debts as <strong>and</strong> when<strong>the</strong>y fall due.The Board of <strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority has, on <strong>the</strong> date of this statement, authorised <strong>the</strong>se financial statements for issue.On behalf of <strong>the</strong> Board of Building <strong>and</strong> Construction AuthorityQuek See TiatChairmanDr John KeungChief Executive Officer26 July <strong>2012</strong>[ 09 ]


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORTMembers of <strong>the</strong> BoardBuilding <strong>and</strong> Construction AuthorityREPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSWe have audited <strong>the</strong> financial statements of <strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority (<strong>the</strong> “Authority”) <strong>and</strong> its subsidiaries (<strong>the</strong> “Group”),which comprise <strong>the</strong> balance sheets of <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Authority as at 31 March <strong>2012</strong>, <strong>the</strong> statements of comprehensive income (including<strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure accounts) <strong>and</strong> statements of changes in reserves of <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Authority <strong>and</strong> cash flow statementof <strong>the</strong> Group for <strong>the</strong> year <strong>the</strong>n ended, <strong>and</strong> a summary of significant accounting policies <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r explanatory information, as set out onpages 12 to 41.Management’s responsibility for <strong>the</strong> financial statementsManagement is responsible for <strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>and</strong> fair presentation of <strong>the</strong>se financial statements in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions of<strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority Act, Chapter 30A (<strong>the</strong> “Act”) <strong>and</strong> Statutory Board Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing St<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> for suchinternal control as management determines is necessary to enable <strong>the</strong> preparation of financial statements that are free from materialmisstatement, whe<strong>the</strong>r due to fraud or error.Auditors’ responsibilityOur responsibility is to express an opinion on <strong>the</strong>se financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance withSingapore St<strong>and</strong>ards on Auditing. Those st<strong>and</strong>ards require that we comply with ethical requirements <strong>and</strong> plan <strong>and</strong> perform <strong>the</strong> audit toobtain reasonable assurance about whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> financial statements are free of material misstatement.An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about <strong>the</strong> amounts <strong>and</strong> disclosures in <strong>the</strong> financial statements. Theprocedures selected depend on <strong>the</strong> auditor’s judgement, including <strong>the</strong> assessment of <strong>the</strong> risks of material misstatement of <strong>the</strong> financialstatements, whe<strong>the</strong>r due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, <strong>the</strong> auditor considers internal control relevant to <strong>the</strong> entity’spreparation of financial statements that give a true <strong>and</strong> fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in <strong>the</strong> circumstances,but not for <strong>the</strong> purpose of expressing an opinion on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating <strong>the</strong>appropriateness of accounting policies used <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating<strong>the</strong> overall presentation of <strong>the</strong> financial statements.We believe that <strong>the</strong> audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient <strong>and</strong> appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.OpinionIn our opinion, <strong>the</strong> consolidated financial statements of <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> balance sheet, statement of comprehensive income <strong>and</strong> statementof changes in reserves of <strong>the</strong> Authority are properly drawn up in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Act <strong>and</strong> Statutory Board Financial<strong>Report</strong>ing St<strong>and</strong>ards to present fairly, in all material respects, <strong>the</strong> state of affairs of <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Authority as at 31 March <strong>2012</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> results, changes in reserves of <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Authority <strong>and</strong> cash flows of <strong>the</strong> Group for <strong>the</strong> year ended on that date.[ 10 ]


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT (continued)REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTSManagement’s responsibility for compliance with legal <strong>and</strong> regulatory requirementsManagement is responsible for ensuring that <strong>the</strong> receipts, expenditure, investment of moneys <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> acquisition <strong>and</strong> disposal of assets,are in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Act. This responsibility includes implementing accounting <strong>and</strong> internal controls as managementdetermines are necessary to enable compliance with <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Act.Auditors’ responsibilityOur responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s compliance based on our audit of <strong>the</strong> financial statements. We conductedour audit in accordance with Singapore St<strong>and</strong>ards on Auditing. We planned <strong>and</strong> performed <strong>the</strong> compliance audit to obtain reasonableassurance about whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> receipts, expenditure, investment of moneys <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> acquisition <strong>and</strong> disposal of assets, are in accordancewith <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Act.Our compliance audit includes obtaining an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong> internal control relevant to <strong>the</strong> receipts, expenditure, investment of moneys<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> acquisition <strong>and</strong> disposal of assets; <strong>and</strong> assessing <strong>the</strong> risks of material misstatement of <strong>the</strong> financial statements from non-compliance,if any, but not for <strong>the</strong> purpose of expressing an opinion on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> entity’s internal control. Because of <strong>the</strong> inherent limitationsin any accounting <strong>and</strong> internal control system, non-compliances may never<strong>the</strong>less occur <strong>and</strong> not be detected.We believe that <strong>the</strong> audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient <strong>and</strong> appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on management’scompliance.OpinionIn our opinion:(a)(b)<strong>the</strong> receipts, expenditure, investment of moneys <strong>and</strong> acquisition <strong>and</strong> disposal of assets by <strong>the</strong> Authority during <strong>the</strong> year are, in allmaterial respects, in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Act; <strong>and</strong>proper accounting <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r records have been kept, including records of all assets of <strong>the</strong> Authority whe<strong>the</strong>r purchased, donatedor o<strong>the</strong>rwise.KPMG LLPPublic Accountants <strong>and</strong>Certified Public AccountantsSingapore26 July <strong>2012</strong>[ 11 ]


BALANCE SHEETSAs at 31 March <strong>2012</strong>GroupAuthorityNote 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Capital <strong>and</strong> reservesShare capital 4 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000Capital account 4 30,816,526 30,816,526 30,816,526 30,816,526Accumulated surplus 199,006,178 165,893,034 197,697,018 165,038,452229,823,704 196,710,560 228,514,544 195,855,978Trust <strong>and</strong> agency funds 5 24,067,170 25,374,772 24,067,170 25,374,772Non-current assetsProperty, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment 6 34,909,705 35,002,501 34,909,705 35,002,501Investment in subsidiary 7 - - 2 2Total non-current assets 34,909,705 35,002,501 34,909,707 35,002,503Current assetsTrade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables 8 17,127,573 14,760,713 16,952,585 14,737,449Cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents 9 323,107,237 257,201,325 320,702,705 255,311,608Total current assets 340,234,810 271,962,038 337,655,290 270,049,057Current LiabilitiesFees received in advance 11 56,145,830 42,835,208 54,963,125 41,807,706Trade payables 1,587,319 1,833,314 1,573,699 1,833,314O<strong>the</strong>r payables <strong>and</strong> accruals 12 35,524,726 20,086,484 35,513,959 20,079,434Provision for pension costs 13 301,792 313,146 301,792 313,146Grants received in advance 14 1,541,887 1,588,658 1,541,887 1,588,658Provision for contribution to consolidated fund 15 8,315,348 7,192,151 8,315,348 7,192,151Income tax payable 63,266 23,845 - -Total current liabilities 103,480,168 73,872,806 102,209,810 72,814,409Non-current liabilitiesFees received in advance 11 24,288,464 17,703,256 24,288,464 17,703,256Provision for pension costs 13 11,332,991 11,005,135 11,332,991 11,005,135Deferred capital grants 16 6,219,188 7,672,782 6,219,188 7,672,782Total non-current liabilities 41,840,643 36,381,173 41,840,643 36,381,173Net Assets 229,823,704 196,710,560 228,514,544 195,855,978Net Assets of trust <strong>and</strong> agency funds 5 24,067,170 25,374,772 24,067,170 25,374,772The accompanying notes form an integral part of <strong>the</strong>se financial statements.[ 12 ]


STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME(including <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure accounts)Year ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong>Operating incomeGroupAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Plan fees 32,665,445 29,812,217 32,665,445 29,812,217Advertisement licence fees 5,735,020 5,470,143 5,735,020 5,470,143Course fees 19,705,778 14,867,858 19,382,778 14,820,845Quality assessment <strong>and</strong> certification fees 12,979,059 10,389,192 11,970,659 10,134,224Trade test fees 21,724,278 15,436,430 21,724,278 15,436,430Contractors registration fees 3,744,455 3,580,695 3,744,455 3,580,695Management fees 48,708,592 29,119,569 48,708,592 29,119,569O<strong>the</strong>r income 7,683,496 13,819,495 7,683,497 13,819,497Total operating income 152,946,123 122,495,599 151,614,724 122,193,620Less: Operating expenditureEmployee benefit costs 64,920,258 64,148,429 64,430,988 64,142,429Depreciation of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment 6,026,149 5,646,226 6,026,149 5,646,226Course <strong>and</strong> programme expenses 18,813,288 15,226,548 18,745,586 15,226,548Operating lease expenses 43,694,947 23,702,337 43,694,947 23,702,337Repairs <strong>and</strong> maintenance expenses 4,718,231 4,703,421 4,718,231 4,703,421O<strong>the</strong>r expenditure 10,682,303 9,031,409 10,411,106 9,017,377Total operating expenditure 148,855,176 122,458,370 148,027,007 122,438,338Net operating surplus/(deficit) 4,090,947 37,229 3,587,717 (244,718)Non-operating income/(expenditure)Interest income 1,724,730 1,407,446 1,716,777 1,403,866Gain/(Loss) on disposal of property,plant <strong>and</strong> equipment 41,531 (58,576) 41,531 (58,576)1,766,261 1,348,870 1,758,308 1,345,290Surplus before government grants brought forward 5,857,208 1,386,099 5,346,025 1,100,572The accompanying notes form an integral part of <strong>the</strong>se financial statements.[ 13 ]


STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (continued)(including <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure accounts)Year ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong>GroupAuthorityNote 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Surplus before governmentgrants carried forward 5,857,208 1,386,099 5,346,025 1,100,572Government grantsOperating <strong>and</strong> development grants 14 42,218,511 39,926,713 42,218,511 39,926,713Deferred capital grants amortised 16 1,349,278 1,279,489 1,349,278 1,279,48943,567,789 41,206,202 43,567,789 41,206,202Surplus before contribution toconsolidated fund, donations <strong>and</strong>income tax 49,424,997 42,592,301 48,913,814 42,306,774Donations (2,900) (3,310) (2,900) (3,310)Contribution to consolidated fund 15 (8,315,348) (7,192,151) (8,315,348) (7,192,151)Income tax expense 18 (56,605) (23,864) - -Surplus for <strong>the</strong> year, representingtotal comprehensive income for<strong>the</strong> year 17 41,050,144 35,372,976 40,595,566 35,111,313The accompanying notes form an integral part of <strong>the</strong>se financial statements.[ 14 ]


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN RESERVESYear ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong>Share Capital AccumulatedGroup Note capital account surplus Total$ $ $ $At 1 April 2010 1,000 30,816,526 130,520,058 161,337,584Surplus for <strong>the</strong> year, representingtotal comprehensive incomefor <strong>the</strong> year - - 35,372,976 35,372,976At 31 March 2011 1,000 30,816,526 165,893,034 196,710,560At 1 April 2011 1,000 30,816,526 165,893,034 196,710,560Surplus for <strong>the</strong> year, representing totalcomprehensive income for <strong>the</strong> year - - 41,050,144 41,050,144Dividends paid 22 - - (7,937,000) (7,937,000)At 31 March <strong>2012</strong> 1,000 30,816,526 199,006,178 229,823,704AuthorityAt 1 April 2010 1,000 30,816,526 129,927,139 160,744,665Surplus for <strong>the</strong> year, representing totalcomprehensive income for <strong>the</strong> year - - 35,111,313 35,111,313At 31 March 2011 1,000 30,816,526 165,038,452 195,855,978At 1 April 2011 1,000 30,816,526 165,038,452 195,855,978Surplus for <strong>the</strong> year, representing totalcomprehensive income for <strong>the</strong> year - - 40,595,566 40,595,566Dividends paid 22 - - (7,937,000) (7,937,000)At 31 March <strong>2012</strong> 1,000 30,816,526 197,697,018 228,514,544The accompanying notes form an integral part of <strong>the</strong>se financial statements.[ 15 ]


CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTYear ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong>Group2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Cash flows from operating activitiesSurplus before government grants 5,857,208 1,386,099Adjustments for:Depreciation of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment 6,026,149 5,646,226Interest income (1,724,730) (1,407,446)(Gain)/Loss on disposal of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment (41,531) 58,576Provision for pension costs 629,648 554,000Surplus before movement in working capital 10,746,744 6,237,455Trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables (2,214,766) 1,706,215Fees received in advance 19,895,830 9,335,067Trade payables (245,995) 58,163O<strong>the</strong>r payables <strong>and</strong> accruals 14,796,564 (2,887,767)Cash generated from operations 42,978,377 14,449,133Payment for contribution to consolidated fund (7,192,151) (6,472,519)Payment for income tax (17,184) (33,303)Donations (2,900) (3,310)Pension paid (313,146) (90,562)Net cash from operating activities 35,452,996 7,849,439Cash flows from investing activitiesPurchase of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment (Note A) (5,263,269) (2,356,291)Proceeds from disposal of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment 50,149 953Interest received 1,572,636 1,346,304Net cash used in investing activities (3,640,484) (1,009,034)The accompanying notes form an integral part of <strong>the</strong>se financial statements.[ 16 ]


Group2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Cash flows from financing activitiesDividends paid (7,937,000) -Government grants received 42,067,424 40,749,623Net cash from financing activities 34,130,424 40,749,623Net increase in cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents 65,942,936 47,590,028Cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents at <strong>the</strong> beginning of year 251,907,525 204,317,497Cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents at <strong>the</strong> end of year (Note B) 317,850,461 251,907,525Note APurchase of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment:Group2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Additions of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment (Note 6) 5,941,971 2,001,467Add:Opening accruals for <strong>the</strong> purchase of plant <strong>and</strong> equipment (Note 12) 300,903 655,727Less:Closing accruals for <strong>the</strong> purchase of plant <strong>and</strong> equipment (Note 12) (979,605) (300,903)5,263,269 2,356,291Note BCash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents:Group2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Cash at bank <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Accountant-General’s Department (”AGD”) 321,607,237 256,601,325Fixed deposits 1,500,000 600,000323,107,237 257,201,325Less: Cash at bank not available for general use (Note 9) (5,256,776) (5,293,800)317,850,461 251,907,525The accompanying notes form an integral part of <strong>the</strong>se financial statements.[ 17 ]


NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThese notes form an integral part of <strong>the</strong> financial statements.The financial statements were authorised for issue by <strong>the</strong> Board of <strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority on 26 July <strong>2012</strong>.1 DOMICILE AND ACTIVITIESThe Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority (<strong>the</strong> “Authority”) is established as a statutory board in <strong>the</strong> Republic of Singapore under<strong>the</strong> Building <strong>and</strong> Construction Authority Act, Chapter 30A (<strong>the</strong> “Act”). The address of <strong>the</strong> Authority’s registered office is 5 MaxwellRoad, #16-00 Tower Block MND Complex, Singapore 069110.The consolidated financial statements of <strong>the</strong> Authority for <strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong> comprise <strong>the</strong> Authority <strong>and</strong> its subsidiaries(toge<strong>the</strong>r referred to as <strong>the</strong> “Group”).The mission of <strong>the</strong> Authority is to shape a safe, high quality, sustainable <strong>and</strong> friendly <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong>.2 BASIS OF PREPARATION(a)(b)(c)STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEThe financial statements have been prepared in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provision of <strong>the</strong> Act <strong>and</strong> Statutory Board Financial <strong>Report</strong>ingSt<strong>and</strong>ards (“SB-FRS”). SB-FRS include Statutory Board Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing St<strong>and</strong>ards, Interpretations of SB-FRS <strong>and</strong> SB-FRSGuidance Notes as promulgated by <strong>the</strong> Accountant-General.BASIS OF MEASUREMENTThe financial statements have been presented on <strong>the</strong> historical cost basis.FUNCTIONAL AND PRESENTATION CURRENCYThe financial statements are presented in Singapore dollars, which is <strong>the</strong> functional currency of <strong>the</strong> Authority.The preparation of financial statements in conformity with SB-FRS requires management to make judgements, estimates <strong>and</strong>assumptions that affect <strong>the</strong> application of accounting policies <strong>and</strong> reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income <strong>and</strong> expenses.Actual results may differ from <strong>the</strong>se estimates.(d)USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTSEstimates <strong>and</strong> underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in<strong>the</strong> period in which <strong>the</strong> estimate is revised <strong>and</strong> in any future periods affected.In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty <strong>and</strong> critical judgements in applying accounting policiesthat have <strong>the</strong> most significant effect on <strong>the</strong> amount recognised in <strong>the</strong> financial statements is included in <strong>the</strong> following notes:• Note 3(g) - provision for pension costs• Note 3(h) - revenue recognition• Note 6 - estimation of useful lives of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment• Note 8 - recoverability of trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables[ 18 ]


2 BASIS OF PREPARATION (continued)(e)Changes in accounting policiesIdentification of related party relationship <strong>and</strong> related party disclosuresFrom 1 March 2011, <strong>the</strong> Group has applied <strong>the</strong> revised SB-FRS 24 Related Party Disclosures (2010) to identify parties that arerelated to <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> to determine <strong>the</strong> disclosures to be made on transactions <strong>and</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing balances, including commitments,between <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> its related parties. SB-FRS 24 (2010) improved <strong>the</strong> definition of a related party in order to eliminateinconsistencies <strong>and</strong> ensure symmetrical identification of relationships between two parties.SB-FRS 24 (2010) provided an exemption for government-related entities from <strong>the</strong> need to provide <strong>the</strong> full disclosures as requiredunder SB-FRS 24 (2010). Government-related entities could now opt to provide disclosures only in respect of those related partytransactions which are considered to be individually or collectively significant. In this respect, <strong>the</strong> Group has elected to apply <strong>the</strong>modified disclosure exemption provided by SB-FRS 24 (2010).The adoption of SB-FRS 24 (2010) affects only <strong>the</strong> disclosures made in <strong>the</strong> financial statements. There is no financial effect on<strong>the</strong> results <strong>and</strong> financial position of <strong>the</strong> Group for <strong>the</strong> current <strong>and</strong> previous financial year. The transactions with Government-relatedentities are disclosed in Note 21.3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESThe accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in <strong>the</strong>se financial statements, <strong>and</strong>have been applied consistently by Group entities, except as explained in note 2(e), which addresses changes in accounting policies.(a)Property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipmentProperty, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation <strong>and</strong> accumulated impairment losses.When parts of an item of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment have different useful lives, <strong>the</strong>y are accounted for as separate items (majorcomponents) of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment.Gains <strong>and</strong> losses on disposal of an item of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment are determined by comparing <strong>the</strong> proceeds from disposalwith <strong>the</strong> carrying amount of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment, <strong>and</strong> are recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account.Subsequent costsThe cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment is recognised in <strong>the</strong> carrying amount of <strong>the</strong> item if it is probablethat <strong>the</strong> future economic benefits embodied within <strong>the</strong> part will flow to <strong>the</strong> Group, <strong>and</strong> its cost can be measured reliably. The carryingamount of <strong>the</strong> replaced part is derecognised. The costs of <strong>the</strong> day-to-day servicing of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment are recognisedin <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account as incurred.DepreciationDepreciation is calculated over <strong>the</strong> depreciable amount, which is <strong>the</strong> cost of an asset, or o<strong>the</strong>r amount substituted for cost, less itsresidual value.Depreciation is recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account on a straight-line basis over <strong>the</strong> estimated useful lives of eachpart of an item of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment, since this most closely reflects <strong>the</strong> expected pattern of consumption of <strong>the</strong> futureeconomic benefits embodied in <strong>the</strong> asset. Assets under construction are not depreciated until <strong>the</strong>y are ready for <strong>the</strong>ir intended use.[ 19 ]


3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)(a)Property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment (continued)Depreciation (continued)The estimated useful lives for <strong>the</strong> current <strong>and</strong> comparative periods are as follows:• Leasehold l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> office building 29 years• Site office <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> improvement 10 years• Office, photo printing <strong>and</strong> training equipment 5 to 10 years• Furniture, fittings <strong>and</strong> fixtures 8 years• Data processing equipment 3 to 5 yearsDepreciation methods, useful lives <strong>and</strong> residual values are reviewed at each financial year-end <strong>and</strong> adjusted if appropriate.(b)SubsidiariesSubsidiaries are entities controlled by <strong>the</strong> Group. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in <strong>the</strong> consolidated financialstatements from <strong>the</strong> date that control commences until <strong>the</strong> date that control ceases. The accounting policies of subsidiaries havebeen changed where necessary to align <strong>the</strong>m with <strong>the</strong> policies adopted by <strong>the</strong> Group.Transactions eliminated on consolidationIntra-group balances <strong>and</strong> transactions, <strong>and</strong> any unrealised income or expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminatedin preparing <strong>the</strong> consolidated financial statements. Unrealised losses are eliminated in <strong>the</strong> same way as unrealised gains, but onlyto <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence of impairment.Accounting for subsidiaryInvestment in subsidiary is stated in <strong>the</strong> Authority’s balance sheet at cost less accumulated impairment losses.(c)Financial instrumentsNon-derivative financial assetsThe Group initially recognises loans <strong>and</strong> receivables on <strong>the</strong> date that <strong>the</strong>y are originated. All o<strong>the</strong>r financial assets are recognisedinitially on <strong>the</strong> trade date at which <strong>the</strong> Group becomes a party to <strong>the</strong> contractual provisions of <strong>the</strong> instrument.The Group derecognises a financial asset when <strong>the</strong> contractual rights to <strong>the</strong> cash flows from <strong>the</strong> asset expire, or it transfers <strong>the</strong>rights to receive <strong>the</strong> contractual cash flows on <strong>the</strong> financial asset in a transaction in which substantially all <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>and</strong> rewardsof ownership of <strong>the</strong> financial asset are transferred. Any interest in transferred financial assets that is created or retained by <strong>the</strong>Group is recognised as a separate asset or liability.Financial assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities are offset <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> net amount presented in <strong>the</strong> balance sheet when, <strong>and</strong> only when, <strong>the</strong> Group hasa legal right to offset <strong>the</strong> amounts <strong>and</strong> intends ei<strong>the</strong>r to settle on a net basis or to realise <strong>the</strong> asset <strong>and</strong> settle <strong>the</strong> liability simultaneously.The Group has <strong>the</strong> following non-derivative financial assets: loans <strong>and</strong> receivables.Loans <strong>and</strong> receivablesLoans <strong>and</strong> receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Suchassets are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans<strong>and</strong> receivables are measured at amortised cost using <strong>the</strong> effective interest method, less any impairment losses.Loans <strong>and</strong> receivables comprise trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables, <strong>and</strong> cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents.Cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents comprise cash balances <strong>and</strong> bank deposits.[ 20 ]


3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)(c)Financial instruments (continued)Non-derivative financial liabilitiesFinancial liabilities are recognised initially on <strong>the</strong> trade date at which <strong>the</strong> Group becomes a party to <strong>the</strong> contractual provisions of<strong>the</strong> instrument.The Group derecognises a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged or cancelled or expired.Financial assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities are offset <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> net amount presented in <strong>the</strong> balance sheet when, <strong>and</strong> only when, <strong>the</strong> Group hasa legal right to offset <strong>the</strong> amounts <strong>and</strong> intends ei<strong>the</strong>r to settle on a net basis or to realise <strong>the</strong> asset <strong>and</strong> settle <strong>the</strong> liability simultaneously.The Group has <strong>the</strong> following non-derivative financial liabilities: trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r payables.Trade <strong>and</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r PayablesSuch financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initialrecognition, <strong>the</strong>se financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost using <strong>the</strong> effective interest method.Share capitalOrdinary sharesOrdinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to <strong>the</strong> issue of ordinary shares are recognised asa deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.(d)Leased assetsLeases in which <strong>the</strong> Group assumes substantially all <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>and</strong> rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Uponinitial recognition, <strong>the</strong> leased asset is measured at an amount equal to <strong>the</strong> lower of its fair value <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> present value of <strong>the</strong> minimumlease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, <strong>the</strong> asset is accounted for in accordance with <strong>the</strong> accounting policy applicableto that asset.O<strong>the</strong>r leases are operating leases <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> leased assets are not recognised in <strong>the</strong> Group’s balance sheet.(e)ImpairmentFinancial assets (including receivables)A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is objective evidence that it is impaired. A financialasset is impaired if objective evidence indicates that a loss event has occurred after <strong>the</strong> initial recognition of <strong>the</strong> asset, <strong>and</strong> that<strong>the</strong> loss event had a negative effect on <strong>the</strong> estimated future cash flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably.An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortised cost is calculated as <strong>the</strong> difference between its carryingamount <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> present value of <strong>the</strong> estimated future cash flows discounted at <strong>the</strong> asset’s original effective interest rate. Lossesare recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account <strong>and</strong> reflected in an allowance account against receivables. Interest on <strong>the</strong>impaired asset continues to be recognised through <strong>the</strong> unwinding of <strong>the</strong> discount. When a subsequent event causes <strong>the</strong> amountof impairment loss to decrease, <strong>the</strong> decrease in impairment loss is reversed through <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account.[ 21 ]


3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)(e)Impairment (continued)Non-financial assetsThe carrying amounts of <strong>the</strong> Group’s non-financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is anyindication of impairment. If any such indication exists, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> asset’s recoverable amount is estimated.The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is <strong>the</strong> greater of its value in use <strong>and</strong> its fair value less costs to sell.In assessing value in use, <strong>the</strong> estimated future cash flows are discounted to <strong>the</strong>ir present value using a pre-tax discount rate thatreflects current market assessments of <strong>the</strong> time value of money <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> risks specific to <strong>the</strong> asset. For <strong>the</strong> purpose of impairmenttesting, assets that cannot be tested individually are grouped toge<strong>the</strong>r into <strong>the</strong> smallest group of assets that generates cash inflowsfrom continuing use that are largely independent of <strong>the</strong> cash inflows of o<strong>the</strong>r assets or groups of assets (<strong>the</strong> “cash-generating unit,or CGU”).An impairment loss is recognised if <strong>the</strong> carrying amount of an asset or its CGU exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairmentlosses are recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account. Impairment losses recognised in respect of CGUs are allocated toreduce <strong>the</strong> carrying amounts of <strong>the</strong> assets in <strong>the</strong> unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that <strong>the</strong> loss has decreasedor no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if <strong>the</strong>re has been a change in <strong>the</strong> estimates used to determine <strong>the</strong> recoverableamount. An impairment loss is reversed only to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong> asset’s carrying amount does not exceed <strong>the</strong> carrying amountthat would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.(f)Employee benefitsDefined contribution plansA defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity<strong>and</strong> will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay fur<strong>the</strong>r amounts. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pensionplans are recognised as an employee benefit expense in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account in <strong>the</strong> periods during which servicesare rendered by employees.Defined benefit retirement obligationsDefined benefit retirement obligations due to pensionable officers are recognised in <strong>the</strong> balance sheet in accordance with <strong>the</strong>Pensions Act, Chapter 225. The pension amounts payable are based on <strong>the</strong> last drawn salaries of <strong>the</strong> respective officers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>officers’ cumulative service period served with <strong>the</strong> Group at <strong>the</strong> time of retirement. The Group does not need to bear any medicalliabilities for pensionable officers upon <strong>the</strong>ir retirement. The provision for pension due to pensionable officers is determined basedon <strong>the</strong> expected payouts to be made by <strong>the</strong> Group in respect of services provided by <strong>the</strong>se pensionable officers up to <strong>the</strong> balancesheet date.Short-term employee benefitsShort-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis <strong>and</strong> are expensed as <strong>the</strong> related service is provided.A liability is recognised for <strong>the</strong> amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus if <strong>the</strong> Group has a present legal orconstructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by <strong>the</strong> employee, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> obligation can be estimatedreliably.Employee leave entitlementEmployee entitlements to annual leave are recognised when <strong>the</strong>y accrue to <strong>the</strong> employees. A provision is made for <strong>the</strong> estimatedliability for annual leave as a result of services rendered by employees up to <strong>the</strong> balance sheet date.[ 22 ]


3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)(g)ProvisionsA provision is recognised if, as a result of a past event, <strong>the</strong> Group has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimatedreliably, <strong>and</strong> it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle <strong>the</strong> obligation. Provisions are determinedby discounting <strong>the</strong> expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of <strong>the</strong> time value of money<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> risks specific to <strong>the</strong> liability. The unwinding of <strong>the</strong> discount is recognised as finance cost.As described in Notes 3(f) <strong>and</strong> 13, <strong>the</strong> Group determines <strong>the</strong> provision for pension costs due to pensionable officers based on <strong>the</strong>expected payouts to be made by <strong>the</strong> Group in respect of services provided by <strong>the</strong>se pensionable officers up to <strong>the</strong> balance sheetdate.Any possible change in key assumptions, on which <strong>the</strong> provision for pension is based, will affect <strong>the</strong> amount of employee benefitcosts in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account.(h)RevenueRevenue is measured at <strong>the</strong> fair value of <strong>the</strong> consideration received or receivable, net of returns, discounts <strong>and</strong> rebates.Plan fees are recognised as income over <strong>the</strong> expected duration of individual projects.Advertisement licence fees <strong>and</strong> contractors registration fees are recognised as income over <strong>the</strong> validity periods of <strong>the</strong> licence <strong>and</strong>registration.Course fees are recognised as income over <strong>the</strong> duration of <strong>the</strong> courses.Quality assessment <strong>and</strong> certification fees are recognised as income over <strong>the</strong> assessment period.Trade test fees are recognised as income on completion of <strong>the</strong> trade tests.Management fees are recognised as income over <strong>the</strong> period of services rendered.(i)(j)Government grantsGovernment grants are recognised initially as deferred income at fair value when <strong>the</strong>re is reasonable assurance that <strong>the</strong>y will bereceived <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group will comply with <strong>the</strong> conditions associated with <strong>the</strong> grant. Grants that compensate <strong>the</strong> Group for expensesincurred are recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account as o<strong>the</strong>r income on a systematic basis in <strong>the</strong> same periods in which<strong>the</strong> expenses are recognised. Grants that compensate <strong>the</strong> Group for <strong>the</strong> cost of an asset are recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong>expenditure account on a systematic basis over <strong>the</strong> useful life of <strong>the</strong> asset.Trust <strong>and</strong> agency fundsTrust <strong>and</strong> agency funds are government grants <strong>and</strong> contributions from o<strong>the</strong>r organisations where <strong>the</strong> Authority is not <strong>the</strong> owner <strong>and</strong>beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> funds. The Authority is merely administering <strong>the</strong> funds on behalf of <strong>the</strong> holders of <strong>the</strong>se funds. Income <strong>and</strong>expenditure of <strong>the</strong>se funds are taken directly to <strong>the</strong> funds. The net assets relating to <strong>the</strong> funds are shown as a separate line itemin <strong>the</strong> balance sheet.Trust <strong>and</strong> agency funds are accounted for on a cash basis.[ 23 ]


3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)(k)(l)(m)Lease paymentsPayments made under operating leases are recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account on a straight-line basis over <strong>the</strong>term of <strong>the</strong> lease. Lease incentives received are recognised as an integral part of <strong>the</strong> total lease expense, over <strong>the</strong> term of <strong>the</strong>lease.Interest incomeInterest income is recognised as it accrues in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account, using <strong>the</strong> effective interest method.Income taxIncome tax expense comprises current <strong>and</strong> deferred tax. Current tax <strong>and</strong> deferred tax are recognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditureaccount except to <strong>the</strong> extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised directly in equity or in o<strong>the</strong>r comprehensiveincome.Current tax is <strong>the</strong> expected tax payable or receivable on <strong>the</strong> taxable income or loss for <strong>the</strong> year, using tax rates enacted orsubstantively enacted at <strong>the</strong> reporting date, <strong>and</strong> any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between <strong>the</strong> carrying amounts of assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities for financialreporting purposes <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for <strong>the</strong> following temporarydifferences: <strong>the</strong> initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination <strong>and</strong> that affects nei<strong>the</strong>raccounting nor taxable income or loss, <strong>and</strong> differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to <strong>the</strong> extent that it is probable that<strong>the</strong>y will not reverse in <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future.Deferred tax is measured at <strong>the</strong> tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when <strong>the</strong>y reverse, based on<strong>the</strong> laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by <strong>the</strong> reporting date. Deferred tax assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities are offset if <strong>the</strong>reis a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities <strong>and</strong> assets, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y relate to income taxes levied by <strong>the</strong> same taxauthority on <strong>the</strong> same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but <strong>the</strong>y intend to settle current tax liabilities <strong>and</strong> assets on a netbasis or <strong>the</strong>ir tax assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities will be realised simultaneously.A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused tax losses, tax credits <strong>and</strong> deductible temporary differences, to <strong>the</strong> extent that it isprobable that future taxable profits will be available against which <strong>the</strong>y can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at eachreporting date <strong>and</strong> are reduced to <strong>the</strong> extent that it is no longer probable that <strong>the</strong> related tax benefit will be realised.(n)(o)Contribution to consolidated fundThe Authority is required to make contribution to <strong>the</strong> Consolidated Fund based on a percentage of <strong>the</strong> net surplus of <strong>the</strong> Authority(before donations) for each of financial year. The percentage of contribution is determined by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Finance.New st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> interpretations not yet adoptedA number of new st<strong>and</strong>ards, amendments to st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning after 1 April2011, <strong>and</strong> have not been applied in preparing <strong>the</strong>se financial statements. None of <strong>the</strong>se are expected to have a significant effecton <strong>the</strong> financial statements of <strong>the</strong> Group.[ 24 ]


4 CAPITAL AND RESERVESShare capitalOrdinary shares2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011No. of shares No. of sharesGroup <strong>and</strong> Authority1 April/31 March 1,000 1,000The shares are held by <strong>the</strong> Minister for Finance, a body corporate incorporated by <strong>the</strong> Minister for Finance (Incorporation) Act(Chapter 183).The holder of <strong>the</strong>se shares is entitled to receive dividends. The shares carry nei<strong>the</strong>r voting rights nor par value.Capital accountThe Capital Account comprises <strong>the</strong> carrying amount of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment transferred from <strong>the</strong> former Building ControlDivision of <strong>the</strong> Public Works Department <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> net value of assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities transferred from <strong>the</strong> former Construction IndustryDevelopment Board when <strong>the</strong> Authority was established on 1 April 1999.[ 25 ]


5 TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDSThe various trust <strong>and</strong> agency funds are:Greenmark Greenmark SustainableGreenmark Incentive Incentive ConstructionMND Incentive Scheme Scheme CapabilityResearch Accessibility Scheme (New (Existing (Design DevelopmentGroup <strong>and</strong> Authority Fund (i) Fund (ii) Buildings) (iii) Buildings) (iv ) Prototype) (v) Fund (vi)$ $ $ $ $ $Balance as at 1 April 2010 12,688,378 5,714,755 3,490,153 2,200,000 - -Add: Receipts 1,628,709 812,890 300,000 2,508,774 500,000 1,000,000Grants received 1,600,000 800,000 300,000 2,500,000 500,000 1,000,000Interest Income 28,709 12,890 - 8,774 - -Less: Disbursements (4,221,863) (2,453,377) (1,154,125) (823,999) (21,372) (178,309)Grant disbursed to- External parties (2,017,972) (1,613,421) (1,154,120) (24,000) - (78,305)- The Authority (1,953,890) - - - - -Secretariat fee to <strong>the</strong> Authority (249,995) (839,950) - (799,996) (21,367) (100,002)Amount paid as bank charges (6) (6) (5) (3) (5) (2)Balance as at 31 March 2011 10,095,224 4,074,268 2,636,028 3,884,775 478,628 821,691Balance as at 1 April 2011 10,095,224 4,074,268 2,636,028 3,884,775 478,628 821,691Add: Receipts 72,721 131,763 - 327,085 750,006 1,500,003Grants received - 100,000 - 300,000 750,006 1,500,003Interest income 72,721 31,763 - 27,085 - -Less: Disbursements (2,262,236) (1,954,526) (522,702) (815,106) (48,075) (1,276,586)Grant disbursed to- External parties (1,696,468) (1,324,559) (522,698) (215,096) - (1,127,482)- The Authority (378,267) - - - - (74,092)Secretariat fee to <strong>the</strong> Authority (187,496) (629,965) - (600,007) (48,073) (75,008)Amount paid as bank charges (5) (2) (4) (3) (2) (4)Balance as at 31 March <strong>2012</strong> 7,905,709 2,251,505 2,113,326 3,396,754 1,180,559 1,045,108WorkplaceProfessionalSMU-BCA Safety <strong>and</strong> Train-<strong>and</strong>- ConversionBuilding Construction Advanced Health Place ProgrammeRetrofit Energy Productivity Management Professionals Professional for SustainableEfficiency <strong>and</strong> Programme WSQ Conversion Design Core PlusFinancing Capability Course Fee Framework Programmes Consultants ProgrammeScheme (vii) Fund (a) Grant (1) Grant (2) Grant (3) Grant (4) Grant (5) Total$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $- - 138,550 784,173 202,256 438,820 - 25,657,085- 2,955,000 69,275 1,130,120 - - 826,667 11,731,435- 2,955,000 69,275 1,130,120 - - 826,667 11,681,062- - - - - - - 50,373- (1,365,764) (138,550) (888,991) (2,000) - (765,398) (12,013,748)- (432,449) (138,550) (888,991) (2,000) - (765,398) (7,115,206)- - - - - - - (1,953,890)- (933,296) - - - - - (2,944,606)- (19) - - - - - (46)- 1,589,236 69,275 1,025,302 200,256 438,820 61,269 25,374,772- 1,589,236 69,275 1,025,302 200,256 438,820 61,269 25,374,7725,462 7,630,158 57,925 912,223 - 27,000 317,454 11,731,8005,462 7,630,158 57,925 912,223 - 27,000 317,454 11,600,231- - - - - - - 131,569(5,462) (4,413,343) (127,200) (1,119,562) (187,416) - (307,188) (13,039,402)(5,462) (4,979,823) (127,200) (1,119,562) - - (307,188) (11,425,538)- - - - (187,416) - - (639,775)- 566,664 - - - - - (973,885)- (184) - - - - - (204)- 4,806,051 - 817,963 12,840 465,820 71,535 24,067,170[ 26 ]


5 TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS (continued)Greenmark Greenmark SustainableGreenmark Incentive Incentive ConstructionMND Incentive Scheme Scheme CapabilityResearch Accessibility Scheme (New (Existing (Design DevelopmentGroup <strong>and</strong> Authority Fund (i) Fund (ii) Buildings) (iii) Buildings) (iv ) Prototype) (v) Fund (vi)$ $ $ $ $ $Represented by:Cash at bank - - 2,636,028 - 478,628 821,691Cash with AGD 10,095,224 4,074,268 - 3,884,775 - -Total cash representing netassets as at 31 March 2011 10,095,224 4,074,268 2,636,028 3,884,775 478,628 821,691Cash at bank - - 2,113,326 - 1,180,559 1,045,108Cash with AGD 7,905,709 2,251,505 - 3,396,754 - -Total cash representing netassets as at 31 March <strong>2012</strong> 7,905,709 2,251,505 2,113,326 3,396,754 1,180,559 1,045,108WorkplaceProfessionalSMU-BCA Safety <strong>and</strong> Train-<strong>and</strong>- ConversionBuilding Construction Advanced Health Place ProgrammeRetrofit Energy Productivity Management Professionals Professional for SustainableEfficiency <strong>and</strong> Programme WSQ Conversion Design Core PlusFinancing Capability Course Fee Framework Programmes Consultants ProgrammeScheme (vii) Fund (a) Grant (1) Grant (2) Grant (3) Grant (4) Grant (5) Total$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $- 1,589,236 69,275 1,025,302 200,256 438,820 61,269 7,320,505- - - - - - - 18,054,267- 1,589,236 69,275 1,025,302 200,256 438,820 61,269 25,374,772- 4,806,051 - 817,963 12,840 465,820 71,535 10,513,202- - - - - - - 13,553,968- 4,806,051 - 817,963 12,840 465,820 71,535 24,067,170NotesThe following funds were set up using grants provided by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of National Development:i. The MND Research Fund is used for providing support for applied Research <strong>and</strong> Development projects to raise <strong>the</strong> qualityof life in Singapore. The Authority is both <strong>the</strong> administrator <strong>and</strong> a recipient of <strong>the</strong> MND Research Fund.ii. The Accessibility Fund is used for providing support to <strong>the</strong> private sector building owners for voluntary upgrading of barrierfreeaccessibility in buildings with <strong>the</strong> provision of basic accessibility features.iii. The Green Mark Incentive Scheme (New Buildings) is used for providing support to encourage developers <strong>and</strong> owners in<strong>the</strong> private sector to attain higher Green Mark ratings for <strong>the</strong>ir developments by <strong>the</strong> adoption of Green Building technologiesin new construction projects.iv. The Green Mark Incentive Scheme (Existing Buildings) is used for providing support to private developers <strong>and</strong> buildingowners to improve energy efficiency of <strong>the</strong> existing building stock.v. The Green Mark Incentive Scheme (Design Prototype) support efforts invested into <strong>the</strong> design stage of green buildings toachieve a higher energy efficient building.vi. The Sustainable Construction Capability Development Fund has been set up to develop capabilities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> indelivering sustainable materials <strong>and</strong> adopting sustainable constructions methods.vii The Building Retrofit Energy Efficiency Financing Scheme is used for providing financial assistance to <strong>the</strong> less financiallystrong building owners, MCST <strong>and</strong> energy services companies to carry out building retrofits.The following funds were granted by <strong>the</strong> Singapore Workforce Development Agency with <strong>the</strong> aim to meet <strong>the</strong> long term requirementsof <strong>the</strong> building <strong>and</strong> construction <strong>industry</strong> for different groups of professionals:1. The SMU-BCA Advanced Management Programme Course Fee Grant provides support to firms for developing <strong>the</strong> strategicmanagement capabilities of senior executives to build sustainable competitive advantages for <strong>the</strong>ir firms.2. The Workplace Safety <strong>and</strong> Health (“WSH”) Professionals Workforce Skills Qualifications (“WSQ”) Framework Grant is aimedat building <strong>the</strong> pool of skilled workers to meet <strong>the</strong> long term requirements of <strong>the</strong> WSH professionals by offering Training <strong>and</strong>Assessment <strong>and</strong> Assessment-Only-Pathway leading to qualifications under <strong>the</strong> WSQ system.3. The Train-<strong>and</strong>-Place Professional Conversion Programmes Grant provides support to skilled Professionals, Managers,Executives <strong>and</strong> Technicians from o<strong>the</strong>r industries who wish to join <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>industry</strong>.4. The Professional Conversion Programme for Sustainable Design Consultants Grant provides support to firms in buildingup <strong>the</strong>ir expertise <strong>and</strong> capabilities in <strong>the</strong> area of green building design.5. The Core Plus Programme Grant aims to train a pipeline of skilled construction tradesman who are looking to upgrade <strong>the</strong>irskills or considering a career in <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>and</strong> <strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> <strong>industry</strong>.The following fund was granted by <strong>the</strong> Productivity Fund Administration Board:a. The Construction Productivity <strong>and</strong> Capability Fund aims to steer <strong>the</strong> construction sector towards higher productivity <strong>and</strong>enhanced capability in complex civil engineering <strong>and</strong> complex building projects.[ 27 ]


6 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENTSite officeLeasehold Office <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>Group <strong>and</strong> Authority l<strong>and</strong> building improvement$ $ $Cost:At 1 April 2010 10,999,260 25,256,382 1,390,657Additions - - 5,360Reclassifications - - -Disposals - - (228,130)At 31 March 2011 10,999,260 25,256,382 1,167,887Additions - - 26,410Reclassifications - - -Disposals - - -At 31 March <strong>2012</strong> 10,999,260 25,256,382 1,194,297Accumulated depreciation:At 1 April 2010 6,447,841 14,773,523 698,626Depreciation 379,285 870,907 73,186Disposals - - (228,130)At 31 March 2011 6,827,126 15,644,430 543,682Depreciation 379,285 870,908 92,629Disposals - - -At 31 March <strong>2012</strong> 7,206,411 16,515,338 636,311Carrying amount:At 1 April 2010 4,551,419 10,482,859 692,031At 31 March 2011 4,172,134 9,611,952 624,205At 31 March <strong>2012</strong> 3,792,849 8,741,044 557,986Office, photoprinting Furniture, Data Assets<strong>and</strong> training fittings processing underequipment <strong>and</strong> fixtures equipment construction Total$ $ $ $ $7,572,690 8,395,029 31,488,261 13,556,330 98,658,609169,079 313,637 780,849 732,542 2,001,467- 11,615,945 102,952 (11,718,897) -(1,541,839) (105,842) (363,409) - (2,239,220)6,199,930 20,218,769 32,008,653 2,569,975 98,420,8561,115,748 908,729 807,205 3,083,879 5,941,971- - 1,851,318 (1,851,318) -(87,185) (26,748) (150,920) - (264,853)7,228,493 21,100,750 34,516,256 3,802,536 104,097,9745,734,839 3,358,718 28,938,273 - 59,951,820538,591 2,439,678 1,344,579 - 5,646,226(1,500,412) (87,741) (363,408) - (2,179,691)4,773,018 5,710,655 29,919,444 - 63,418,355641,788 2,498,596 1,542,943 - 6,026,149(83,973) (21,359) (150,903) - (256,235)5,330,833 8,187,892 31,311,484 - 69,188,2691,837,851 5,036,311 2,549,988 13,556,330 38,706,7891,426,912 14,508,114 2,089,209 2,569,975 35,002,5011,897,660 12,912,858 3,204,772 3,802,536 34,909,705[ 28 ]


6 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)Source of estimation uncertaintyThe costs of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over <strong>the</strong>ir useful lives. Management estimates<strong>the</strong> useful lives of <strong>the</strong>se property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment to be between 3 to 29 years. The Group reviews annually <strong>the</strong> estimateduseful lives of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment based on factors that include asset utilisation <strong>and</strong> technological changes. It is possiblethat future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in <strong>the</strong>se estimates brought about by changes in <strong>the</strong>sefactors. A reduction in <strong>the</strong> estimated useful lives of property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment would increase depreciation expense <strong>and</strong> decreasenon-current assets.7 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIESAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $1) BCA International Private LimitedUnquoted equity shares, at cost 2 22) BCA Centre for Sustainable Buildings Ltd was incorporated on 26 August 2011 as a company limited by guarantee with no equity share.Details of <strong>the</strong> subsidiaries at 31 March <strong>2012</strong> are as follows:Country ofProportion ofincorporationownershipName of subsidiary <strong>and</strong> operation Principal activity interest2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011% %BCA International Private Limited Singapore Construction related 100 100consultancy <strong>and</strong>advisory servicesBCA Centre for Sustainable Buildings Ltd Singapore Research <strong>and</strong> 100 -consultancy servicesfor sustainablebuilding policies <strong>and</strong>climate change[ 29 ]


8 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLESGroupAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Trade receivables 7,939,952 6,552,496 7,780,599 6,513,586O<strong>the</strong>r debtors 6,383,590 1,762,113 6,374,641 1,761,117Grant receivable from Ministry ofNational Development (”MND”) 1,808,175 2,734,932 1,808,175 2,734,932Grant receivable from ProductivityFund Administration Board (“PFAB”) - 2,955,000 - 2,955,000Amounts due from subsidiaries- trade - - 1,451 17,665- non-trade - - 13,562 -Deposits 15,830 27,660 15,830 27,660Loans <strong>and</strong> receivables 16,147,547 14,032,201 15,994,258 14,009,960Prepayments 980,026 728,512 958,327 727,48917,127,573 14,760,713 16,952,585 14,737,449The amounts receivable from MND, PFAB <strong>and</strong> non-trade amounts due from subsidiaries are unsecured, interest-free <strong>and</strong> repayableon dem<strong>and</strong>.The credit period on rendering of services is 30 days (2010/2011: 30 days). No interest is charged on trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables<strong>and</strong> no collateral is held by <strong>the</strong> Group over trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables.Before accepting any new customer, <strong>the</strong> Group assesses <strong>the</strong> potential customer’s credit quality <strong>and</strong> defines credit limits by customer.A majority of <strong>the</strong> Group’s receivables that are nei<strong>the</strong>r past due nor impaired are creditworthy counterparties with good track recordof credit history. Except for two of <strong>the</strong> Group’s customers with a total balance of $3,144,756 (2010/2011: $1,436,316) which makesup 32% (2010/2011: 41%) of <strong>the</strong> Group’s receivables with credit terms, <strong>the</strong>re are no o<strong>the</strong>r customers who represent more than 5%of <strong>the</strong> total balance of trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables.In determining <strong>the</strong> recoverability of a receivable, <strong>the</strong> Group considers any change in <strong>the</strong> credit quality of <strong>the</strong> receivable from <strong>the</strong>date credit was initially granted up to <strong>the</strong> reporting date. If <strong>the</strong> financial condition of <strong>the</strong> customers were to deteriorate, <strong>the</strong> Groupwould be required to record additional impairment losses. Credit risk is limited due to management’s on-going evaluation of <strong>the</strong>creditworthiness of <strong>the</strong> Group’s customers <strong>and</strong> that majority of <strong>the</strong> Group’s trade receivables are within <strong>the</strong>ir expected cash collectioncycle.[ 30 ]


8 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (continued)The table below is an analysis of <strong>the</strong> ageing of loans <strong>and</strong> receivables at <strong>the</strong> reporting date:Gross Impairment Gross Impairment2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2010/2011$ $ $ $GroupNo credit terms 6,513,412 209,995 10,739,509 201,106Not past due 9,273,024 - 3,106,992 -Past due- < 3 months 420,541 - 330,106 -- 3 months to 6 months 73,883 - 39,211 -- 6 months to 12 months 30,871 - 17,489 -- > 12 months 54,157 8,346 8,346 8,34616,365,888 218,341 14,241,653 209,452AuthorityNo credit terms 6,528,425 209,995 10,757,174 201,106Not past due 9,308,119 - 3,156,586 -Past due- < 3 months 307,741 - 268,006 -- 3 months to 6 months 30,383 - 11,811 -- 6 months to 12 months 23,871 - 17,489 -- > 12 months 14,060 8,346 8,346 8,34616,212,599 218,341 14,219,412 209,452The movement in <strong>the</strong> allowance for impairment in respect of loans <strong>and</strong> receivables during <strong>the</strong> year is as follows:Group <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $At 1 April 209,452 191,572Impairment loss recorded 8,889 17,880At 31 March 218,341 209,452[ 31 ]


9 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTSGroupAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Cash at bank 14,547,131 1,590,358 13,642,599 300,641Fixed deposits 1,500,000 600,000 - -Cash with <strong>the</strong> AGD 307,060,106 255,010,967 307,060,106 255,010,967Total 323,107,237 257,201,325 320,702,705 255,311,608Fixed deposits at <strong>the</strong> financial year end bear interest ranging from 0.45% to 0.60% (2010/2011: 0.60%) per annum <strong>and</strong> for tenureof 12 to 18 months (2010/2011: 18 months). These fixed deposits are readily convertible to known amount of cash.Cash at bank not available for general useThe Group acts as a collection agent for various parties on certain projects <strong>and</strong> collects payments on <strong>the</strong>ir behalf. Included in cash<strong>and</strong> cash equivalents as at <strong>the</strong> year end is an amount of $5,256,776 (2010/2011: $5,293,800) pertaining to <strong>the</strong> bank balances heldon behalf of <strong>the</strong>se parties.The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk is disclosed in Note 10(b).On 2 November 2009, <strong>the</strong> Accountant-General's Department (“AGD”) issued a circular no. 4/2009 to centrally manage <strong>the</strong> cash ofall Statutory Boards <strong>and</strong> Ministries under <strong>the</strong> Centralised Liquidity Management (“CLM”) scheme. This scheme aims to achievehigher returns <strong>and</strong> to better manage credit risk at <strong>the</strong> Whole-of-Government level. The Authority participated in <strong>the</strong> CLM schemestarting from 25 March 2010.10 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, FINANCIAL RISKS AND CAPITAL RISKS MANAGEMENT(a)Categories of financial instrumentsThe following table sets out <strong>the</strong> financial instruments as at <strong>the</strong> balance sheet date:Financial AssetsGroupAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Loans <strong>and</strong> receivables at amortised cost:Cash <strong>and</strong> bank balances 323,107,237 257,201,325 320,702,705 255,311,608Trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables (excluding prepayments) 16,147,547 14,032,201 15,994,258 14,009,960Total 339,254,784 271,233,526 336,696,963 269,321,568Financial LiabilitiesLiabilities at amortised costs:Trade payables 1,587,319 1,833,314 1,573,699 1,833,314O<strong>the</strong>r payables (excluding provision for unconsumed leave) 32,589,102 17,450,822 32,578,335 17,443,772Total 34,176,421 19,284,136 34,152,034 19,277,086[ 32 ]


10 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, FINANCIAL RISKS AND CAPITAL RISKS MANAGEMENT (continued)(b)Financial risk management policies <strong>and</strong> objectivesThe Group has documented financial risk management policies. These policies set out <strong>the</strong> Group’s overall business strategies<strong>and</strong> its risk management philosophy. The Group’s overall financial risk management programme seeks to minimise potentialadverse effects of financial performance of <strong>the</strong> Group. These programmes cover specific areas, such as market risk (includingforeign exchange risk, interest rate risk, equity price risk), credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, use of derivative financialinstruments <strong>and</strong> investing excess cash. Such written policies are reviewed annually by <strong>the</strong> management <strong>and</strong> periodic reviewsare undertaken to ensure that <strong>the</strong> Group’s policy guidelines are complied with.The Group does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.There has been no change to <strong>the</strong> Group’s exposure to <strong>the</strong>se financial risks or <strong>the</strong> manner in which it manages <strong>and</strong> measures<strong>the</strong> risk. Market risk exposures are measured using sensitivity analysis indicated below.(i)Foreign exchange risk managementThe Group has limited exposure to foreign currency exchange risk as its operations are substantially transacted in Singaporedollars, which is <strong>the</strong> functional currency of <strong>the</strong> Authority.All financial assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities reported on <strong>the</strong> balance sheet are denominated in Singapore dollars.(ii)Interest rate risk managementThe Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments mainly relate to cash <strong>and</strong> bank balances which are all short-term. Hence,management do not expect future fluctuations in interest rates to have a significant impact on <strong>the</strong> Group’s results or cash flows.The Group’s policy is to maintain cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents with reputable financial institutions. The Authority participatedin <strong>the</strong> Centralised Liquidity Management scheme starting from 25 March 2010.(iii)Credit risk managementCredit risk refers to <strong>the</strong> risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to <strong>the</strong>Group. The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties as a means of mitigating <strong>the</strong> riskof financial loss from defaults. The Group’s exposure <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> financial position of its counterparties are continuously monitored<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> aggregate value of transactions concluded is spread amongst approved counterparties.The Group does not have any significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty or any group of counterparties havingsimilar characteristics. The credit risk on liquid funds is limited because <strong>the</strong> counterparties are reputable financial institutions<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> AGD.The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in <strong>the</strong> financial statements, grossed up for any allowances for losses,represents <strong>the</strong> Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk without taking account of <strong>the</strong> value of any collateral obtained.Fur<strong>the</strong>r details of credit risks on trade <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r receivables are disclosed in Note 8 to <strong>the</strong> financial statements.[ 33 ]


10 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, FINANCIAL RISKS AND CAPITAL RISKS MANAGEMENT (continued)(iv)Liquidity <strong>and</strong> funding risk managementThe Group funds its operations through a mix of internally-generated funds <strong>and</strong> government grants. The Group reviewsregularly its liquidity reserves, comprising cash flows from its operations <strong>and</strong> government grants, to ensure sufficient liquidityis maintained at all times.Liquidity <strong>and</strong> interest risk analysisNon-derivative financial assetsThe Group’s non-derivative financial assets as disclosed in Note 10(a) above, are due within one year from <strong>the</strong> balancesheet date. Interest rates on cash <strong>and</strong> bank balances are disclosed in Note 9 to <strong>the</strong> financial statements.(v)Fair values of financial assets <strong>and</strong> financial liabilitiesThe carrying amounts of financial assets <strong>and</strong> financial liabilities reported on <strong>the</strong> balance sheet approximate <strong>the</strong>ir respectivefair values due to <strong>the</strong> relatively short-term maturity of <strong>the</strong>se financial instruments.(vi)Capital risk management policies <strong>and</strong> objectivesAs a statutory board, <strong>the</strong> Authority’s primary mission is to achieve government objectives as detailed under Note 1.The capital structure of <strong>the</strong> Group consists of share capital, capital account <strong>and</strong> accumulated surplus which are presentedin <strong>the</strong> statement of changes in reserves.The Group’s overall strategy remains unchanged from <strong>the</strong> last financial year.11 FEES RECEIVED IN ADVANCEGroupAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Balance at 1 April 60,538,464 51,203,397 59,510,962 50,668,847Add: Fees received 118,335,020 91,688,404 117,635,522 90,893,471Less: Fees recognised as revenue (98,439,190) (82,353,337) (97,894,895) (82,051,356)Balance at 31 March 80,434,294 60,538,464 79,251,589 59,510,962Represented by:Current 56,145,830 42,835,208 54,963,125 41,807,706Non-current 24,288,464 17,703,256 24,288,464 17,703,25680,434,294 60,538,464 79,251,589 59,510,962[ 34 ]


12 OTHER PAYABLES AND ACCRUALSGroupAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $ $ $Amounts due to MND 5,346,652 5,096,734 5,346,652 5,096,734Maintenance deposits 89,019 96,090 89,019 96,090Sundry creditors 2,280,866 1,610,867 2,280,866 1,610,867Provision for unconsumed leave 2,935,624 2,635,662 2,935,624 2,635,662Accruals for operating expenses 8,964,343 7,830,943 8,953,576 7,823,893Accruals for <strong>the</strong> purchase of plant <strong>and</strong> equipment 979,605 300,903 979,605 300,903Security/Tender deposits 13,263,410 1,599,706 13,263,410 1,599,706Scholarship 1,665,207 915,579 1,665,207 915,57935,524,726 20,086,484 35,513,959 20,079,434The amounts due to MND mainly pertain to <strong>the</strong> amounts collected on <strong>the</strong>ir behalf by <strong>the</strong> Authority for certain projects which <strong>the</strong>Group acts as an agent <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r non-trade payables. The balances are unsecured, interest-free <strong>and</strong> repayable on dem<strong>and</strong>.Included in Security/Tender deposits is an amount of $12,389,576 (2010/2011: Nil) collected under <strong>the</strong> Green Mark Gross FloorArea Incentive Scheme.[ 35 ]


13 PROVISION FOR PENSION COSTSGroup <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $At 1 April 11,318,281 10,854,843Add: Amount provided during <strong>the</strong> year 629,648 554,00011,947,929 11,408,843Less: Amount paid during <strong>the</strong> year (313,146) (90,562)At 31 March 11,634,783 11,318,281Represented by:Current 301,792 313,146Non-current 11,332,991 11,005,13511,634,783 11,318,281There are currently 19 (2010/2011: 20) employees of <strong>the</strong> Group who are under pension schemes o<strong>the</strong>r than CPF. The pensionamount to be paid to each employee upon retirement under this scheme is dependent on, among o<strong>the</strong>r factors, <strong>the</strong> number of yearsof service <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> last drawn salary. The total pension costs are shared between <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> AGD. The Group is only liablefor <strong>the</strong> pension costs for <strong>the</strong> period of service completed by <strong>the</strong> employee with <strong>the</strong> Group.The employees are entitled to select one of <strong>the</strong> following pension options upon retirement:(i) <strong>Annual</strong> pension payments;(ii) Reduced pension with gratuity payment; or(iii) Lump sum gratuity payment.Provision for pension costs is made using <strong>the</strong> management’s best estimate of <strong>the</strong> options that will be chosen by <strong>the</strong> employeesupon retirement, based on historical trends.[ 36 ]


14 GRANTS RECEIVED IN ADVANCEGroup <strong>and</strong> AuthorityOperating grants2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011Development grantsTotal2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011 2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011At 1 April 936,492 1,282,099Government grants received/receivable 42,322,713 39,227,173Reversal of government grants receivable (113,186) -Net reversal from/(transfer to) deferred capital grant (Note 16) 113,186 (150,753)Transfer to deferred capital grants - (150,753)Reversal of government grants receivable 113,186 -Net (transfer to)/reversal from income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account(Operating <strong>and</strong> development grant) (42,755,687) (39,422,027)Transfer to income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account (42,755,687) (39,422,027)Reversal of government grants receivable - -At 31 March 503,518 936,492Total grants received <strong>and</strong> transferred to deferred capital grants since establishmentTotal grants received <strong>and</strong> transferred to income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account since establishment652,166 1,243 1,588,658 1,283,342411,737 1,522,450 42,734,450 40,749,623(553,840) - (667,026) -(8,870) (366,841) 104,316 (517,594)(8,870) (366,841) (8,870) (517,594)- - 113,186 -537,176 (504,686) (42,218,511) (39,926,713)(16,664) (504,686) (42,772,351) (39,926,713)553,840 - 553,840 -1,038,369 652,166 1,541,887 1,588,65826,664,611 26,768,927275,163,702 232,945,191[ 37 ]


15 PROVISION FOR CONTRIBUTION TO CONSOLIDATED FUNDThe Authority is required to make contributions to <strong>the</strong> Consolidated Fund in accordance with <strong>the</strong> Statutory Corporations (Contributionsto Consolidated Fund) Act, Chapter 319A <strong>and</strong> in accordance with <strong>the</strong> Finance Circular Minute No. M5/2005 with effect from 1 April2004. The contribution is based on a percentage, as decided by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Finance, of <strong>the</strong> net surplus of <strong>the</strong> Authority (beforedonations) for <strong>the</strong> financial year.The total contribution for <strong>the</strong> year can be reconciled to <strong>the</strong> net surplus (before donations) as followsAuthority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Surplus of <strong>the</strong> Authority before donation <strong>and</strong> contribution to consolidatedfund representing surplus subject to contribution 48,913,814 42,306,774Contribution at 17% (2010/2011: 17%) 8,315,348 7,192,15116 DEFERRED CAPITAL GRANTSGroup <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $At 1 April 7,672,782 8,434,677Add: Government grants received <strong>and</strong> utilised (Note 14) (104,316) 517,594Less: Amortisation of deferred capital grants (1,349,278) (1,279,489)At 31 March 6,219,188 7,672,78217 SURPLUS FOR THE YEARThe following items have been included in arriving at surplus for <strong>the</strong> year:Group <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Contributions to defined contribution plans, included in employee benefit costs 6,586,521 6,143,400Cost of obligations in respect of defined benefit retirement plan (pension costs),included in employee benefit costs 629,648 554,000[ 38 ]


18 INCOME TAX EXPENSEThe Authority is required to make contribution to <strong>the</strong> Consolidated Fund based on a percentage of <strong>the</strong> net surplus of <strong>the</strong> Authority(before donations) for each of financial year. A subsidiary of <strong>the</strong> Authority is subject to tax under Section 13(1)(e) of <strong>the</strong> SingaporeIncome Tax Act.Group2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Current tax expenseCurrent period 63,266 23,845Adjustment for prior periods (6,661) 1956,605 23,864Reconciliation of effective tax rateProfit before tax of <strong>the</strong> subsidiary 524,651 285,527Income tax using <strong>the</strong> Singapore tax rate of 17 %(2010/2011: 17%) 89,191 48,540Tax exempt income (25,925) (24,695)Adjustment for prior periods (6,661) 1956,605 23,86419 OPERATING LEASESLeases as lesseeNon-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:Group <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Within one year 44,024,872 39,549,524Between one <strong>and</strong> five years 32,526,123 67,911,74476,550,995 107,461,268Details of <strong>the</strong> leases are as follow:(1) Foreign workers’ dormitoriesThe Group leases a number of dormitories under operating leases. The leases typically run for a period of 3 years, withan option to renew <strong>the</strong> lease after that date. The leases are sublet by <strong>the</strong> Group to external parties. The lease <strong>and</strong> subleaseexpires in 2015.(2) OfficeThe Group leases its office/storage space under operating lease for a period of 3 years, with an option to renew <strong>the</strong> leaseafter <strong>the</strong> date.[ 39 ]


19 OPERATING LEASES (continued)Leases as lessorThe Group leases out <strong>the</strong> foreign workers’ dormitories held under operating leases. The future minimum income receivables undernon-cancellable leases are as follows:Group <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Within one year 47,698,514 32,985,979Between one <strong>and</strong> five years 37,676,443 44,570,07385,374,957 77,556,052During <strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Group recognised $45,014,892 (2010/2011: $24,507,991) as income under managementfee in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account.20 CAPITAL COMMITMENTSCapital expenditure approved by <strong>the</strong> Group but not provided for in <strong>the</strong> financial statements is as follows:Group <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Amount approved <strong>and</strong> committed 5,861,386 1,624,452Amount approved but not committed 114,192 5,734,50621 RELATED PARTIESParties are considered to be related if one party has <strong>the</strong> ability to control <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r party or exercise significant influence over <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r party in making financial <strong>and</strong> operating decisions.Some of <strong>the</strong> Group’s transactions <strong>and</strong> arrangements are with related parties <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>the</strong>se on <strong>the</strong> basis determined between<strong>the</strong> parties is reflected in <strong>the</strong>se financial statements. The balances are unsecured, interest-free <strong>and</strong> repayable on dem<strong>and</strong>, unlesso<strong>the</strong>rwise stated.Transactions with government-related entitiesThe Singapore Government has control over <strong>the</strong> Authority, as well as Ministries, Organs of States <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Statutory Boards.Collectively, but not individually significant transactionsThe Authority is a Statutory Board under <strong>the</strong> Ministry of National Development (“MND”), championing <strong>the</strong> development of an excellent<strong>built</strong> <strong>environment</strong> for Singapore. “Built <strong>environment</strong>” refers to buildings, structures <strong>and</strong> infrastructure in our surroundings that provide<strong>the</strong> setting for <strong>the</strong> community’s activities.The Authority charges fees for <strong>the</strong> services provided. Collectively, income generated from <strong>the</strong> fees received from <strong>and</strong> provision oftraining <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r services to Ministries, Organs of States <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Statutory Boards constitute 8% (2010/2011: 9%) of <strong>the</strong> totaloperating income. Purchase of supplies <strong>and</strong> services from Ministries, Organs of States <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Statutory Boards constitute 37%(2010/2011: 21%) of total operating expenditure.[ 40 ]


21 RELATED PARTIES (continued)Collectively, but not individually significant transactions (continued)These transactions are conducted in <strong>the</strong> ordinary course of <strong>the</strong> Authority’s business on terms comparable to those with o<strong>the</strong>r entitiesthat are not government-related.Nature <strong>and</strong> amount of individually significant transactionsThe Authority receives operating grants from <strong>the</strong> MND, which is subject to yearly approval. Operating grants from <strong>the</strong> MNDrecognised in <strong>the</strong> income <strong>and</strong> expenditure account during <strong>the</strong> year <strong>and</strong> grants received in advance from <strong>the</strong> MND are disclosed inNote 14.Transactions with o<strong>the</strong>r related partiesDuring <strong>the</strong> financial year, <strong>the</strong> Group entered into <strong>the</strong> following transactions with related parties (i.e. entities in which <strong>the</strong> Boardmembers have control or joint control) which are not government-related entities:Group <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Advertisement licence fees 1,270 -Quality assessment <strong>and</strong> certification fees 395,169 393,224Course fees 193,824 96,801Trade test fees 200,260 -Site office <strong>and</strong> improvement expense (187,981) -Staff training expense (93) (24,374)Purchase of furniture, fixtures <strong>and</strong> fittings (5,350) (14,980)Transactions with key management personnelKey management personnel of <strong>the</strong> Group are those persons having <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>and</strong> responsibility for planning, directing <strong>and</strong>controlling <strong>the</strong> activities of <strong>the</strong> entity. The Board members <strong>and</strong> executive key management are considered as key managementpersonnel of <strong>the</strong> Group. Executive key management comprises Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Managing Director (“MD”), DeputyCEOs, Executive Director, Directors (including Acting Director) <strong>and</strong> Deputy MDs.The compensation to key management personnel is as follows:Group <strong>and</strong> Authority2011/<strong>2012</strong> 2010/2011$ $Short-term benefits 4,706,943 4,993,859Post-employment benefits 268,504 243,778Total 4,975,447 5,237,63722 DIVIDENDS PAIDIn accordance with <strong>the</strong> Capital Management Framework for Statutory Board, <strong>the</strong> Authority declared <strong>and</strong> paid a dividend of $7,937,000based on <strong>the</strong> accounting surplus in 2010/2011, to <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Finance on 30 November 2011.[ 41 ]


Printed on <strong>environment</strong>ally-friendly paper


5 Maxwell Road • #16-00 Tower Block MND Complex • Singapore 069110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!