scarcely any social intercourse between <strong>the</strong> men <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> women; <strong>the</strong>sexes lived <strong>the</strong>ir lives separately” (Briffault, I: 510).In <strong>the</strong> earliest forms of human society, marriage was muchdifferent from what it is today. When a man married a woman, he oftenmarried all her sisters as well, <strong>and</strong> she, all his bro<strong>the</strong>rs (Briffault,I: 629ff). “However rare collective sexual organizations may be at <strong>the</strong>present day, <strong>the</strong>y are by no means so rare as might be supposed . . .. <strong>the</strong>re is scarcely a portion of <strong>the</strong> habitable globe where those formsof sexual association or <strong>the</strong> evidence of <strong>the</strong>ir recent existence are notto be found” (Briffault, I: 765).Women had a high status in <strong>the</strong> oldest societies. In caseswhere men <strong>and</strong> women did live toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> often left hispeople <strong>and</strong> went to live as a stranger in his wife’s household (matrilocalmarriage). Thus <strong>the</strong> wife was in a relatively secure position. ‘Thepractice of matrilocal marriage was <strong>the</strong> original form of marriageunion, <strong>and</strong> is coeval with <strong>the</strong> origin of humanity” (Briffault, I: 307).Inheritance rights passed from <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r, not <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r (matrilinealdescent). Consequently, “in <strong>the</strong> great majority of uncultured [sic]societies women enjoy a position of independence <strong>and</strong> of equalitywith <strong>the</strong> men <strong>and</strong> exercise an influence which would appear startlingin <strong>the</strong> most feministic modern civilized society” (Briffault, I: 311).Sexist white observers have misunderstood <strong>the</strong> role of women’s laborin early societies. For example, Native American women were viewedas oppressed because of <strong>the</strong>ir lives of hard work, which ran counterto European notions of femininity. But <strong>the</strong>ir right of access to essentiallabor was <strong>the</strong> very basis of <strong>the</strong>ir independence (Briffault, I: 317,328).Taboos <strong>and</strong> ceremonies around menstruation have also beenmisunderstood. These taboos are simply an extension from <strong>the</strong> animalworld, where all species limit access to females when <strong>the</strong>y aremenstruating, giving birth, or nursing. Menstruating taboos wereoriginally invented by women <strong>and</strong> were used as vetoes against maleadvances during <strong>the</strong>se times. In fact, <strong>the</strong> most severe taboos arefound in those societies where “<strong>the</strong> women exercise an almost despoticpower over <strong>the</strong> men” (Briffault, II: 400, 404).White male observers usually misinterpret <strong>the</strong> role of malesin nature societies. While talking to leaders of <strong>the</strong> men’s groups <strong>and</strong>ignoring <strong>the</strong> women, <strong>the</strong>y reach <strong>the</strong> false conclusion that <strong>the</strong> societyas a whole is organized by males. The chief, who is only <strong>the</strong> leaderof hunters <strong>and</strong> warriors, is interpreted as being a king or president(Briffault, I: 492). But male activities like hunting <strong>and</strong> warfare areonly a part of tribal life. The labor <strong>and</strong> activities of women are atleast as important as that of men. True, among nature societies wefind examples where women are treated harshly, even brutally. Butwhere such brutality exists, as among certain tribes in Australia <strong>and</strong>Melanesia, <strong>the</strong>re is evidence of a previous matrilocal system that hassince broken down (Briffault, I: 334).28revolutionaries take power.I believe it is necessary to develop a new socialism, one thattakes into account <strong>the</strong> failures of industrial socialism <strong>and</strong> that makesroom for <strong>the</strong> special contributions of <strong>Gay</strong> people, women, <strong>and</strong> ancientThird World cultures. In <strong>the</strong> remaining part of this chapter, Iwill try to outline <strong>the</strong> main features, as I see <strong>the</strong>m, of this new socialism.To begin with, I believe we must bring about a massive withdrawalof allegiance from <strong>the</strong> dominant institutions of industrialism.We have all been assaulted with incessant industrial propag<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong>lies from newspapers, magazines, television, schools, <strong>and</strong> universities.As a result, most of us still feel some sense of allegiance to suchthings as formal education, industrial medicine, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> professions.Nearly every American still has some faith in <strong>the</strong> U.S. government,<strong>the</strong> Christian religion, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> American way of life. But as we haveseen from this entire book, <strong>the</strong> dominant institutions of industrialismarose from an oppressive patriarchal culture <strong>and</strong> continue tofunction as oppressors to this day. As new socialists, we should neverfail to expose <strong>the</strong> inherent fraud of lawyers, doctors, academics, police,politicians, priests, psychiatrists, generals, <strong>and</strong> business people.We should miss no opportunity in denouncing <strong>the</strong>ir privileges <strong>and</strong>power <strong>and</strong> in undermining all vestiges of <strong>the</strong>ir moral authority. Andwe must demystify ourselves to overcome <strong>the</strong> belief instilled in usthat we can’t heal ourselves, educate ourselves, create our own religion,or wage warfare on our own behalf. We can do all <strong>the</strong>se things– <strong>and</strong> more! We must work to regain confidence in ourselves as <strong>the</strong>makers of our own culture <strong>and</strong> satisfiers of our own needs <strong>and</strong> tothrow off <strong>the</strong> yoke of <strong>the</strong> professional parasites who now live off ourlife energies.The way to do <strong>the</strong>se things is through collective work. I meanreal collective work, not <strong>the</strong> forced collectivity of industrial socialism(which is often nothing more than state control masquerading as collectivity).For example, we can form small collectives to start gettingfood for ourselves in <strong>the</strong> cities (such as <strong>the</strong> many non-profit foodco-ops on <strong>the</strong> West Coast). We can join toge<strong>the</strong>r to publish our ownmagazines <strong>and</strong> books. We can study herbs <strong>and</strong> people’s medicine toheal ourselves. We can form collectives to work on satisfying practicallyany of our needs – <strong>and</strong> we can do it better than <strong>the</strong> privilegedprofessionals can (I’ve seen it happen).In this way we begin replacing industrial technology withpeople’s technology. In place of large corporations controlled byprofiteers <strong>and</strong> staffed by an elite of experts, we create decentralizedproductive units that are integrated into <strong>the</strong> neighborhoods <strong>the</strong>yserve. We rediscover <strong>the</strong> joys of learning <strong>and</strong> sharing craft mysteries<strong>and</strong> feeling love toward <strong>the</strong> products of our labor. We encouragetechnical methods that are humane <strong>and</strong> democratic (like solar energy<strong>and</strong> wind power) <strong>and</strong> reject methods that encourage central control<strong>and</strong> regimentation (like nuclear power). Of course, some may object145
<strong>and</strong> discipline that it borrowed wholesale from earlier Christian missionaries<strong>and</strong> monastic orders (Fitzgerald, 133). It is conceivable thatcommunism in China could end up becoming just ano<strong>the</strong>r patriarchalreligion, as it already has in <strong>the</strong> U.S.S.R. Or perhaps China willcontinue to raise penetrating questions about industrialism <strong>and</strong> sotake socialism on to a new <strong>and</strong> unprecedented path.Industrial socialism of all stripes has been very uptight aboutsex . As we have seen, homosexuality is now illegal in Russia. InChina, <strong>Gay</strong> people are said not to exist <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject is not publiclymentioned. In Cuba, homosexuality was declared a “social pathology”in 1971 <strong>and</strong> many <strong>Gay</strong> people were sent to concentration camps.The nuclear family – which is <strong>the</strong> life blood of patriarchal civilization– has never been questioned in any industrializing socialist society,<strong>and</strong> in fact has been greatly re-enforced.In addition, industrial socialism eagerly embraces science,views industrialism as desirable <strong>and</strong> inevitable, <strong>and</strong> ridicules <strong>the</strong> oldanimistic religions that have existed in each country in which it hascome to power (which is ironic, since <strong>the</strong>se old religions, if anything,represent <strong>the</strong> basic values of <strong>the</strong> peasant masses over <strong>the</strong> centuries).The leaders of industrial socialism have generally been masculineidentifiedmales who owe <strong>the</strong>ir initial success <strong>and</strong> power to organizedarmies.In <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gay</strong> movement, industrial socialistsoften have weak feelings of <strong>Gay</strong> identity <strong>and</strong> a shallow concept of<strong>Gay</strong> culture <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gay</strong> spirituality. Typically, <strong>the</strong>y view <strong>Gay</strong> revolutionas meaning nothing more than supporting <strong>the</strong> programs of <strong>the</strong> NewLeft, while also having <strong>Gay</strong> sex on <strong>the</strong> side. Too often, <strong>the</strong>y believethat <strong>Gay</strong> men have nothing more in common than sex (which isactually a lot!).Just like liberals, <strong>Gay</strong> industrial socialists also have been insensitiveto <strong>the</strong> true depth of corruption in Western civilization. Thisinsensitivity comes out through such slogans as, “Socialism is <strong>the</strong>answer!” This implies that all we have to do is get worker controlover <strong>the</strong> factories <strong>and</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>r means of production. As we haveseen, however, <strong>the</strong> problem is not only who controls <strong>the</strong> means ofproduction, but <strong>the</strong> means of production <strong>the</strong>mselves. Industrial socialistsstep back from <strong>the</strong> conclusion that what we need is not a newadministration in Washington or a new economic policy, but a newcivilization.In making <strong>the</strong>se criticism, I am not saying that industrialsocialism has not helped people. It certainly has, far more thanbourgeois liberalism ever did or could. But what I am saying is thatindustrial socialism is not necessarily <strong>the</strong> highest or only form ofrevolutionary socialism. Even in cases where it has been absolutelynecessary (as in China), we can view it as something to begin with,to build on, ra<strong>the</strong>r than as <strong>the</strong> absolute <strong>and</strong> final end of all humanstruggle toward liberation. The revolution shouldn’t end when <strong>the</strong>144The first shamans (or healer priests) in nature societies werewomen (Briffault, II: 518). The first male shamans imitated womenby taking on <strong>the</strong>ir roles <strong>and</strong> wearing <strong>the</strong>ir clothing. Wherever patriarchyhas overthrown matriarchy, even in nature societies, <strong>the</strong> previousreligious power of women is feared as something diabolical. Thepriestess is turned into <strong>the</strong> witch (Briffault, II: 561). Unfortunately,Robert Briffault, whose book I have been citing so far, freaks out overhomosexuality, which he dismisses as “<strong>the</strong> indulgence of unnaturalvices” (Briffault, II: 533). And so he can’t imagine <strong>the</strong>re could be alink between cross-dressing shamans <strong>and</strong> homosexuality. But we willsee later <strong>the</strong>re is such a link, <strong>and</strong> that as <strong>the</strong> priestess was turned into<strong>the</strong> witch, so <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gay</strong> male shaman was turned into <strong>the</strong> heretic.In stone age Europe, humans probably lived pretty muchlike people in surviving nature cultures. For example, archaeologysuggests that a shamanistic religion was practiced <strong>and</strong> that womenhad high status. From as early as 30,000 BC we find an abundanceof female figurines <strong>and</strong> cave drawings that show women leadingreligious ceremonies (Rawson, 13ff) . From about 5,000 BC, <strong>the</strong>heads <strong>and</strong> necks on many of <strong>the</strong>se figurines are stretched out to formsmooth dildos, so that <strong>the</strong> composite figure is that of a fat femalewith a dildo emerging from <strong>the</strong> top (Rawson, 18). We know from<strong>the</strong> practices of existing nature societies in Africa <strong>and</strong> India that suchimplements were often used in ritual Lesbian acts where an olderwoman initiated a younger (Rawson, 18 & 71). In addition, <strong>the</strong>oldest deity worshipped by <strong>the</strong> Celts, Germans, <strong>and</strong> Anglo-Saxonsof Western Europe was a Great Mo<strong>the</strong>r goddess who was associatedwith womb-like caves.Many bisexual figurines have been found from <strong>the</strong> stoneage – notably in Trasimeno, Italy; <strong>the</strong> Weinberg Caverns, Bavaria;<strong>the</strong> Jordan Valley; <strong>and</strong> Pembrokeshire, Wales (Rawson, 17). Amongsurviving nature societies, bisexual deities often indicate bisexualreligious rites (Baumann, passim). Many cave paintings show picturesof nude men with erections dancing toge<strong>the</strong>r in groups withoutwomen. Among nature people, a man’s cum is often thought toembody ancestral religious power, “<strong>and</strong> this probably explains onemale initiation ritual . . . . during which adult male initiates have analintercourse with novices” (Rawson, 48).Animals (especially horned ones) also play a large part instone-age art, <strong>and</strong> male human figures appear wearing animal skins .These figures are probably shamans, since nature societies often identify<strong>the</strong>mselves collectively with <strong>the</strong> animals <strong>the</strong>y eat (totemism) <strong>and</strong>imitate <strong>the</strong>ir behavior, including <strong>the</strong>ir sex life, in religious rites.At <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> stone age <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> bronzeage (around 4,000 BC), sacred places came to be marked by <strong>the</strong> presenceof huge stones, called megaliths. They extended from Irel<strong>and</strong>,through Brittany, to Portugal, Italy, Malta, South Arabia, India, Malaya,Sumatra, Indonesia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong>s (Rawson, 42). These29
- Page 1 and 2: 172WITCHCRAFTand the Gay Countercul
- Page 3 and 4: Scott, George, Phallic Worship, Men
- Page 5 and 6: Kieckhefer, Richard, European Witch
- Page 7 and 8: Butterworth, E.A. S. , Some Traces
- Page 9 and 10: 1780 AD An ancient dildo isstill be
- Page 11: 1440 AD Gille de Rais, a closeperso
- Page 14 and 15: A similar type of venom can be foun
- Page 16 and 17: 1173 AD Peter Waldo (orWaldes) form
- Page 18 and 19: The English drew attention to Joan
- Page 21 and 22: 152[The passion for destruction is
- Page 23 and 24: classes burn with resentment. With
- Page 25 and 26: Hence there arises the need for pol
- Page 27: that such methods are totally inapp
- Page 31 and 32: to power, he said: “Neither railw
- Page 33 and 34: Gay liberals have been indifferent
- Page 35 and 36: eration to generation through schoo
- Page 37 and 38: 136[We don’t want your reforms.We
- Page 39 and 40: esearchers are now employed by the
- Page 41 and 42: ment. This tendency for primitive m
- Page 43 and 44: existence. Consider the way we, as
- Page 45 and 46: and the CIA stated that an ex-FBI i
- Page 47 and 48: to deal with other men in an openly
- Page 49 and 50: the islands. In 1892, she was depos
- Page 51 and 52: wilderness” (Hacker, 131-2). Most
- Page 53 and 54: from 250,000 in 1700 to 1,400,000 i
- Page 55 and 56: SEX AMONG THE ZOMBIESI seeI wear th
- Page 57 and 58: In non-industrialized societies, pr
- Page 59 and 60: depart. But the wiser and honester
- Page 61 and 62: A religious attitude toward Lesbian
- Page 63 and 64: Many straight writers still insist
- Page 65 and 66: SEX MAGIC IN THEEARLY THIRD WORLDBe
- Page 67 and 68: Roman Catholicism had no monopoly o
- Page 69 and 70: Under paganism, witchcraft was thou
- Page 71 and 72: were subjected to torture, many “
- Page 73 and 74: appear in court and swear that his
- Page 75 and 76: THE MASS MURDER OFWOMEN AND GAY PEO
- Page 77 and 78: pression, self-discipline, and obed
- Page 79 and 80:
Cohn ridicules Harner because his b
- Page 81 and 82:
nected to its hatred of sex. In the
- Page 83 and 84:
en have always been excluded from t
- Page 85 and 86:
THE MEDIEVALCOUNTERCULTUREThe old r