COLLOQUIUM FRATRUM“Through the mutual conversation and consolation of the brethren . . .”Smalcald Articles III/IVFOLLOWING DR. MARVA DAWN’S LORDIn the Reformation issue of LOGIA, Pastor Andrew Dimitreviewed two of Dr. Marva Dawn’s books. He ended with a statementthat cannot stand without contradiction. His closing statementwas: “Perhaps, after all, Ms. Dawn would like me to leavemy church and forsake my Lord, in order to join her church andfollow her Lord.”I have exchanged letters with Pastor Dimit. In my letter tohim I stated,For a book review to contain the suggestion that Marvais a non-Christian, that she follows a different “lord”other than the precious Lord Jesus who has sustainedher with so much strength during her faith and healthbattles, is completely inaccurate and inappropriate, anunloving, cruel, and sarcastic statement, in my opinion.In Pastor Dimit’s response to my letter he defended hisreview, ending with this statement: “Ms. Dawn is the one whowrote books devoid of the gospel of forgiveness, so she shouldn’ttake offense to them being named as such.”I urge the readers of LOGIA to be fair to Dr. Dawn by readingthe books that were reviewed so that they can answer for themselvesif she follows a different Lord than they follow. Permit meto share a few quotations from The Hilarity of Community.We experience glad Hilarity in the sure knowledge thatwe are loved by God, as manifested in the past by God’screation of us and in the life, death, resurrection, andascension of Jesus Christ. Our present Hilarity is madepossible by the empowering indwelling of the HolySpirit in our lives. Our Hilarity is heightened when welook forward confidently to the wild ecstasy that will beours at the end of time when all suffering is finished andwe experience the eternal, incredible Joy of face-to-facecommunion with God (Preface, p. x).Relationships that float around on the surface deny thereality of God’s gutsy love, a love so full that it compelledChrist to suffer depths of degradation and cruel crucifixionto demonstrate it to us (Preface, p. xv).Though we have blown it, we need not despair. Forgivenessgives us new hope. Though from a human perspectiveour offerings are anything but pleasing as a sacrificeand far from holy in the way we live, yet God receivesthem as such when we respond to his love in our worship.All kinds of things spoil our offering—nastywords, cruel actions, judgmental thoughts, selfish failures,manipulative insensitivities, proud stubbornnesses.What a great Hilarity it creates in our lives when,for all these errors, Christ offers forgiveness andremoves the condemnation (p. 22).In the same way, we who are God’s people are setapart as special vessels for his purposes. That does notmean, of course, that we are better than anyone else.Pride has no place when we realize how often we loseour love and the Hilarity that motivates it. However,we do understand what distinguishes us from thosewho do not believe—not our success at acting moreholy, but God’s loving forgiveness which sets us apartas holy (p. 23).Yet the Hilarity of our faith is this hope: in his perfectlove Christ forgives us. He makes our communities holyin God’s sight (p. 24).Dr. Dawn’s Lord surely sounds like my Lord. What aboutyou?The Reverend Orval MuellerNew Orleans, Louisiana49
REVIEWS“It is not many books that make men learned . . . but it is a good book frequently read.”Martin LutherReview EssayRechtfertigung und Schöpfung in der Theologie Werner Elerts. BySigurjón Arni Eyjólfsson. Hannover: Lutherisches Verlagshaus:Arbeiten zur Geschichte und Theologie des Luthertums, NF 10,1994. 267 pages.■ Werner Elert was probably the most significant Lutheran theologianof the twentieth century. His was a decidedly confessionalLutheran theology that was addressed to the problems of thetwentieth century. Although his work is of deep interest toLutherans in America, there are very few guides to his theology.Therefore, the appearance of this book as a reliable introductionto the theology of Werner Elert is an event of great importance.The purpose of this review-essay is threefold. First, it is toserve as a normal book review, which is to announce theappearance of a new book and to evaluate its contents. Second,because Elert was a very creative writer and developed his ownterminology, this essay is intended as a reference work for thosewho will read the book, by introducing some of his moreimportant concepts and supplying English equivalents for someof his German terms. Third, since many theological studentstoday cannot read scientific German, the essay aims to present abrief synopsis of Elert’s system in order to help fill an unfortunategap in the English literature.This study on justification and creation in the theology ofElert, published in 1994, is by Sigurjón Arni Eyjólfsson, aLutheran pastor from Iceland, written as a theological dissertationunder Prof. Eberhard Wölfel and submitted to the Universityof Kiel for the doctorate in 1991. It is the eighth dissertation onWerner Elert and the first one successfully to present his true system.Eyjólffson gives the reader a masterly synthesis of the theologyof the Erlangen giant.THE STRUCTURE OF EYJOLFSSON’S BOOKThe book is divided into four principal parts.(1) “The Location of Elert’s Theology” (pp. 13–43) briefly presentshis biography and “theological homeland,” his roots in theOld-Lutheran Church of Prussia and in Erlangen theology. This isfollowed by a discussion of his controversies with Karl Barth andwith the German Christians. The opening part concludes with a51critical analysis of previous interpretations of Elert (Krötke,Duensing, Owen, Wolf, Mildenberger, Joest, Langemeyer, Thiemann,Wiebering, Austad, Peters, Hauber). Of these, only Haubertried to interpret Elert’s theology in its own context rather than onthe basis of foreign contexts, such as Barthianism.(2) “The Law of God” (pp. 44–143) presents the most difficultpart of Elert’s thought. First the author presents God’s law asthe order of life that moves through creation, and then the law asGod’s order of death.(3) “The Gospel” (pp. 144–201) presents, in order, Elert’sview of Christ as Mediator, the doctrine of the atonement, andjustification.(4) “The Opening up of Creation” (pp. 202–246) discusses theimplications of redemption within the world as God’s creation.The book concludes with a diagram of Elert’s theology (p. 246).Eyjólfsson points out that Elert comprehensively covered dogmaticsand ethics three times: he gave a combined approach toboth disciplines in his outline of doctrine, 1924–26, he presenteddogmatics in the first volume and ethics in the second volume ofhis Morphologie in 1931, and then he reached his culmination in thedogmatics and ethics texts of 1940 and 1949, respectively. He developedthe same theological system in his shorter works and journalarticles. With great skill, the author gathers the leading points ofElert’s theology from all his works into a coherent unity.The Location of Elert’s TheologyElert published about four thousand pages; the authorseems to have mastered all the books as well as Elert’s two dissertations(DPhil and DTheol), his sermons, and various articlesthat appeared in journals and church papers. He describes eachof Elert’s major works, starting with Der Kampf um das Christentum,1921, a brilliant study in the theology of the nineteenth century,which won him his call to Erlangen in 1923. Next followedthe first edition of Die Lehre des Luthertums in Abriß (1924),which appeared in an enlarged edition in 1926 (the first editiontranslated into English by Charles Jacobs). His most famouswork was Morphologie des Luthertums (1931–32), 2 volumes(vol. 1 translated into English by Walter Hansen). His dogmatics,Der christliche Glaube, followed in 1940 (translated intoEnglish and partly published by Martin Bertram, WalterBouman, and Rudolph Norden), and his ethics, Das christlicheEthos, in 1949 (translated into English by Carl Schindler). After