Modern surgical treatment of otosclerosis - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Modern surgical treatment of otosclerosis - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Modern surgical treatment of otosclerosis - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology<br />
University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Helsinki</strong>, Finland<br />
and<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology<br />
Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Finland<br />
<strong>Modern</strong> <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
Juuso Kujala<br />
ACADEMIC DISSERTATION<br />
To be publicly discussed, with the permission <strong>of</strong> the Medical Faculty <strong>of</strong> the University<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Helsinki</strong>, in the Seminar room 3 <strong>of</strong> Biomedicum <strong>Helsinki</strong>, Haartmaninkatu 8, on 12<br />
July 2009, at 12 noon.<br />
<strong>Helsinki</strong> 2009
Supervised by:<br />
Docent Timo P. Hirvonen<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology<br />
University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Helsinki</strong><br />
<strong>Helsinki</strong>, Finland<br />
Reviewed by:<br />
Docent Kyösti Laitakari<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oulu<br />
Oulu, Finland<br />
and<br />
Docent Jaakko Pulkkinen<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Turku<br />
Turku, Finland<br />
Dissertation opponent:<br />
Docent Hannu Valtonen<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology<br />
University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Helsinki</strong><br />
<strong>Helsinki</strong>, Finland<br />
and<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Kuopio<br />
Kuopio, Finland<br />
ISBN 978-952-92-5480-4 (paperback)<br />
ISBN 978-952-10-5487-7 (PDF)<br />
http://ethesis.helsinki.<strong>fi</strong><br />
<strong>Helsinki</strong> University Printing House<br />
<strong>Helsinki</strong> 2009
To my Family
Contents<br />
LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS 7<br />
ABBREVIATIONS 8<br />
ABSTRACT 9<br />
TIIVISTELMÄ (FINNISH SUMMARY) 11<br />
1 INTRODUCTION 13<br />
2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 15<br />
2.1 De<strong>fi</strong>nition <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> 15<br />
2.2 Histology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> 15<br />
2.4 Epidemiology 16<br />
Histological <strong>otosclerosis</strong> 16<br />
Clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> 17<br />
2.3 Aetiology 17<br />
Genetic inheritance 18<br />
Viral aetiology 18<br />
Endocrinological factors 19<br />
Immunological factors 19<br />
2.5 Clinical <strong>fi</strong>ndings and pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> 20<br />
Conductive hearing loss 20<br />
Sensorineural hearing loss 21<br />
Vestibular symptoms 22<br />
Tinnitus 22<br />
Otosclerosis and Meniere’s disease 23<br />
2.6 Diagnosis 23<br />
Audiological evaluations 23<br />
Radiological evaluations 24<br />
2.7 Surgical <strong>treatment</strong> 25<br />
Stapedectomy versus stapedotomy 26<br />
Prosthesis 26<br />
Sealing 28<br />
Lasers in primary surgery 28<br />
4
Stapedius tendon preservation 29<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> primary and revision surgery 30<br />
Surgical <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong> 31<br />
Cochlear implantation 33<br />
2.8 Complications 33<br />
Perioperative complications 33<br />
Sensorineural hearing loss 34<br />
Perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stula 35<br />
Reparative granuloma 36<br />
Vertigo 36<br />
Taste disturbance 37<br />
Facial paresis 37<br />
Suppurative labyrinthitis and meningitis 38<br />
Radiological evaluation <strong>of</strong> postoperative SNHL 38<br />
2.9 Conservative <strong>treatment</strong> 39<br />
Hearing aid 39<br />
Medical <strong>treatment</strong> 39<br />
3 AIMS OF THE STUDY 41<br />
4 MATERIALS AND METHODS 42<br />
4.1 Study design 42<br />
Study I 42<br />
Study II 42<br />
Studies III and IV 43<br />
4.2 Surgery 43<br />
4.3 Objective measurements and analysis 44<br />
Video-oculography 44<br />
Visual feedback posturography 45<br />
Audiogram 45<br />
Statistical analysis 45<br />
4.4 Ethical aspects 46<br />
5 RESULTS AND COMMENTS 48<br />
5.1 Simultaneous bilateral surgery (I) 48<br />
5.2 Outpatient surgery (II) 50<br />
5
5.3 Video-oculography studies (III, IV) 52<br />
Long-term evaluation (III) 52<br />
Short-term evaluation (IV) 54<br />
6 DISCUSSION 56<br />
6.1 Simultaneous bilateral surgery (I) 56<br />
6.2 Outpatient surgery (II) 58<br />
6.3 Video-oculography studies (III, IV) 60<br />
7 CONCLUSIONS 63<br />
8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 64<br />
9 REFERENCES 66<br />
APPENDIX 83<br />
ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS 84<br />
6
List <strong>of</strong> original publications<br />
The thesis is based on the following original publications referred to in the text by their<br />
Roman numerals.<br />
I. Kujala J, Aalto H, Ramsay H, Hirvonen TP. Simultaneous bilateral stapes surgery.<br />
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 128(4): 347-51, 2008.<br />
II. Vasama J-P, Kujala J, Hirvonen TP. Is small-fenestra stapedotomy a safer outpatient<br />
procedure than total Stapedectomy? ORL 68(2): 99-102, 2006.<br />
III. Kujala J, Aalto H, Hirvonen TP. Video-oculography <strong>fi</strong>ndings in patients with<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otology&Neurotology 26(6): 1134-7, 2005.<br />
IV. Kujala J, Aalto H, Hirvonen TP. Video-oculography <strong>fi</strong>ndings and vestibular<br />
symptoms on the day <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery. Submitted.<br />
These articles have been reprinted with the kind permission <strong>of</strong> their copyright holders.<br />
7
Abbreviations<br />
AB-GAP air-bone gap<br />
AC air conduction<br />
BC bone conduction<br />
BHI binaural hearing impairment<br />
BI balance index<br />
CO2 carbon dioxide<br />
COG center <strong>of</strong> gravity<br />
CT computed tomography<br />
CTN chorda tympani nerve<br />
ENG electronystagmography<br />
Er:YAG erbium yttrium aluminum garnet<br />
GBP Glasgow bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot<br />
HLA human leucocyte antigen<br />
HSN head-shaking nystagmus<br />
IWP impairment <strong>of</strong> whole person<br />
KTP potassium-titanyl-phosphate<br />
LDV laser-Doppler vibrometry<br />
LWS loose-wire syndrome<br />
MHC major histocompatibility complex<br />
MRI magnetic resonance imaging<br />
PLF perilymphatic <strong>fi</strong>stula<br />
PTA four-tone pure-tone average<br />
QBP quartile bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot<br />
RF resonance frequency<br />
RNA ribonucleic acid<br />
SD standard deviation<br />
SDT severe disabling tinnitus<br />
SDS speech discrimination score<br />
SNHL sensorineural hearing loss<br />
SPV slow phase velocity<br />
STAMP stapedotomy minus prosthesis<br />
UCL uncomfortable level<br />
VAS visual analogue scale<br />
VEMP vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials<br />
VFP visual feedback posturography<br />
VOG video-oculography<br />
8
Abstract<br />
Abstract<br />
The era <strong>of</strong> modern <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> started in 1956, when Shea<br />
successfully removed stapes and reconstructed the ossicular chain with a Teflon prosthesis<br />
after sealing the oval window with a thin skin graft. Total stapedectomy is still used<br />
successfully, but more commonly today only a small opening is made in the stapes<br />
footplate with a micro-drill or laser. Through the small stapedotomy opening a piston<br />
prosthesis attached to the long process <strong>of</strong> the incus can be introduced into the vestibulum<br />
and only the stapes superstructure is removed. Both techniques are effective in long-term<br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> hearing. Surgical <strong>treatment</strong> still contains the risk <strong>of</strong> inner ear damage, but<br />
with in last few decades the risk <strong>of</strong> sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has decreased<br />
signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly. This could be due to technical evolution in equipment (laser, microscope,<br />
instruments, prosthesis) used in surgery, but also the trend favouring stapedotomy might<br />
have some effect. In the early stages <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery, only one ear was operated on<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the fear <strong>of</strong> SNHL. Nowadays, more surgeons are willing to operate on both<br />
sides since the safety <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery has increased markedly. Simultaneous bilateral<br />
surgery has not been reported in stapes surgery, but has been introduced with success in<br />
ophthalmology and orthopaedic surgery. Simultaneous surgery would give the patient the<br />
opportunity to gain advantages <strong>of</strong> bilateral hearing within one session, with less time spent<br />
in hospital and on sick leave. Although SNHL after surgery is rare, vestibular symptoms<br />
are common. Fortunately, vestibular symptoms are usually mild and short lasting, but in<br />
some cases they can prevent the patient to be treated as outpatient. The mechanism for<br />
vestibular symptoms and the exact end organ affected is still unveiled. This thesis presents<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> experimental simultaneous bilateral stapes surgery, and vestibular symptoms<br />
and <strong>fi</strong>ndings before and after unilateral stapes surgery. In addition, we explore reasons for<br />
outpatient failures in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> surgery.<br />
Study I examines the outcome <strong>of</strong> simultaneous bilateral surgery. Both ears <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
suffering from bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong> were operated on in a single session. Hearing and<br />
balance <strong>of</strong> patients were objectively measured during the one-year follow-up. Hearing was<br />
evaluated with standard pure tone and speech audiograms and vestibular apparatus with<br />
visual feedback posturography (VFP). Subjective estimation <strong>of</strong> hearing, vestibular<br />
symptoms and quality <strong>of</strong> life were assessed with questionnaires. In study II, reasons for<br />
outpatient failures in stapes surgery were explored. Forty-seven consecutive stapedotomies<br />
and stapedectomies performed by the same surgeon as outpatient surgeries were included.<br />
Applicability <strong>of</strong> these two operative methods for outpatient surgery was examined and the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> failures on hearing results were analysed. Postoperative vestibular symptoms and<br />
the end organ(s) affected were investigated in studies III and IV. With video-oculography<br />
(VOG), eye movements were measured preoperatively and at one week, one month and 3<br />
months postoperatively in the <strong>fi</strong>rst phase (III). In the second phase (IV), recordings were<br />
obtained at a mean <strong>of</strong> four hours postoperatively.<br />
9
Abstract<br />
The hearing results <strong>of</strong> the simultaneous bilateral surgery were comparable with those <strong>of</strong><br />
the unilateral surgeries reported in the literature. No signi<strong>fi</strong>cant or bilateral complications<br />
occurred. Recovery from the operation was fast, and all patients were discharged from<br />
hospital on the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative day, as planned. Half <strong>of</strong> the patients had vestibular<br />
symptoms within the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative week, but no one estimated these as having more<br />
than a mild to moderate influence on their daily activities. All vestibular symptoms<br />
resolved and VFP results returned to normal levels in all patients. Signi<strong>fi</strong>cant<br />
improvement in performance and quality <strong>of</strong> life was noted already month after operation<br />
in subjective evaluations provided in the questionnaires, and the effect persisted<br />
throughout the study period. In evaluation <strong>of</strong> unplanned admissions in Study II,<br />
signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly more outpatient failures occurred for medical reasons in the stapedectomy<br />
group (13%) than in the stapedotomy group (2%). All <strong>of</strong> these patients suffered from<br />
vestibular symptoms, but in every case patients were discharged from hospital on the <strong>fi</strong>rst<br />
postoperative day in good health. Patients with unplanned admission had similar<br />
postoperative hearing results as the rest <strong>of</strong> the study group. VOG measurements in Study<br />
III did not present any speci<strong>fi</strong>c type <strong>of</strong> nystagmus in patients having vestibular symptoms<br />
postoperatively. However, VOG measurements immediately after surgery (IV) revealed<br />
nystagmus consistent with a minor disturbance <strong>of</strong> the semicircular canals in 33% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients. Subjectively, half <strong>of</strong> the patients reported vestibular symptoms that could have<br />
originated from both otolith and semicircular canal parts <strong>of</strong> the vestibular organ.<br />
Based on the results <strong>of</strong> Study I, simultaneous bilateral surgery is a suitable approach in<br />
bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. But at an early stage <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> a new <strong>treatment</strong> protocol, one<br />
should remain conservative and advocate this <strong>treatment</strong> only to voluntary patients with<br />
primary operations and normal anatomical conditions. Because there were signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly<br />
more unplanned admissions with stapedectomy in Study II, stapedotomy should be<br />
favoured if outpatient surgery is planned. Signs <strong>of</strong> semicircular canal disturbance were<br />
present in Study IV, but no speci<strong>fi</strong>c nystagmus pattern could be detected in patients with<br />
vestibular symptoms after the surgery in Studies III and IV. This leads to the conclusion<br />
that vestibular symptoms probably have diverse origins.<br />
10
Tiivistelmä (Finnish summary)<br />
Tiivistelmä (Finnish summary)<br />
<strong>Modern</strong>i otoskleroosikirurgian aikakausi alkoi 1956, jolloin Shea poisti ensimmäistä<br />
kertaa onnistuneesti jalustimen ja korvasi sen keinotekoisella proteesilla. Syntyneen<br />
sisäkorva-avanteen hän sulki ohuella ihosiirteellä. Täydellinen jalustimen poisto<br />
(stapedektomia) on edelleen kliinisessä käytössä, mutta nykyisin useammin jalustimen<br />
levyyn tehdään pieni reikä (stapedotomia) laseria tai poraa käyttäen. Jalustimessa olevan<br />
reiän läpi alasimeen toisesta päästä kiinnitetty mäntämäinen proteesi ulottuu sisäkorvaan<br />
ja ainoastaan jalustimen haarakkeet poistetaan. Kuulonparannus saavutetaan hyvin<br />
molemmilla tekniikoilla ja tulokset ovat pitkäaikaisseurannoissa olleet pysyviä.<br />
Kirurgiseen hoitoon liittyy edelleenkin pysyvän sisäkorvavaurion riski, mutta vuosien<br />
saatossa riski sisäkorvakuulon heikkenemiselle vaikuttaa selvästi pienentyneen. Tämä<br />
positiivinen muutos voi johtua kehityksestä välineistössä (laser, mikroskooppi, kirurgiset<br />
instrumentit, proteesit), mutta myös stapedotomian yleistyminen saattaa vaikuttaa asiaan.<br />
Alkuvaiheessa ainoastaan potilaan toinen korva leikattiin koska pelättiin mahdollista<br />
sisäkorvakuulon heikkenemistä. Nykyisin yhä useammat korvakirurgit leikkaavat<br />
molemmat korvat, koska myöhemmin julkaistuissa seurannoissa riski sisäkorvakuulon<br />
heikkenemiselle on pienentynyt verrattuna alkuvaiheen tuloksiin. Samanaikaista<br />
molemminpuolista leikkausta ei otoskleroosikirurgiassa ole aiemmin kuvattu, vaikka esim.<br />
silmäkirurgiassa ja ortopediassa samanaikainen molemminpuolinen kirurgia on<br />
osoittautunut käyttökelpoiseksi. Samanaikainen molempien korvien leikkaaminen<br />
mahdollistaisi potilaalla stereokuulon hyödyt heti yhden leikkauksen jälkeen ja vähemmän<br />
aikaa kuluisi sairaalassa ja sairaslomalla. Vaikka sisäkorvakuulon heikkeneminen<br />
leikkauksen jälkeen on harvinaista, tasapainoelinoireet leikkauksen jälkeen ovat yleisiä.<br />
Useimmiten nämä kuitenkin ovat lieviä ja lyhytkestoisia, mutta joskus kotiutus lykkäytyy<br />
seuraavaan päivään päiväkirurgiseksi suunnitellulla potilaalla huimauksen takia.<br />
Huimauksen syntymekanismi ja siihen liittyvät tasapainoelimen osa(t) ovat selvittämättä.<br />
Tässä väitöskirjassa esitetään tulokset kokeellisesta samanaikaisesta molemminpuolisesta<br />
otoskleroosikirurgiasta. Lisäksi esitetään minkälaisia tasapainoelinoireita ja löydöksiä<br />
liittyy perinteiseen yhden korvan leikkaamiseen sekä syitä, jotka johtavat päiväkirurgisen<br />
hoidon epäonnistumiseen.<br />
Ensimmäinen tutkimus (I) keskittyy samanaikaiseen molemminpuoliseen leikkaukseen.<br />
Molemminpuolista otoskleroosia sairastavien potilaiden korvat leikattiin peräkkäin<br />
samana päivänä. Potilaiden kuulotuloksia ja tasapainoelimen toimintaa seurattiin<br />
objektiivisin mittarein vuoden ajan. Kuulontutkimuksina tehtiin standardoidut äänes- ja<br />
puhekuulonmittaukset ja tasapainoelimen toimintaa seurattiin tasapainolevyn avulla.<br />
Potilaat antoivat omat subjektiiviset arviot kuulostaan, huimausoireistaan ja<br />
elämänlaadusta kyselykaavakkeiden avulla. Toinen tutkimus (II) selvittää syitä, jotka<br />
johtavat päiväkirurgisen hoidon epäonnistumiseen. Neljäkymmentäseitsemän peräkkäistä<br />
päiväkirurgiseksi suunniteltua saman kirurgin leikkaamaa stapedotomia ja stapedektomia<br />
potilasta otettiin mukaan tutkimukseen. Selvitimme, miten eri leikkaustekniikat soveltuvat<br />
päiväkirurgisesti tehtäviksi sekä sairaalaan jäännin syitä ja näiden vaikutusta<br />
kuulotuloksiin. Tutkimuksissa III ja IV selvitetään leikkauksen jälkeisen huimauksen<br />
11
Tiivistelmä (Finnish summary)<br />
luonnetta ja määrää sekä mahdollista tasapainoelimen osaa oireiden takana. Videookulogra<strong>fi</strong>an<br />
(VOG) avulla mitattiin nystagmusta ennen ja jälkeen leikkauksen.<br />
Ensimmäisessä vaiheessa (III) tehtiin mittauksia ennen leikkausta sekä viikko, kuukausi ja<br />
3 kuukautta leikkauksen jälkeen. Seuraavassa vaiheessa (IV) mittaukset tehtiin potilaille<br />
noin neljä tuntia leikkauksen jälkeen.<br />
Samanaikaisen molemminpuolisen leikkauksen tulokset kuulon osalta ovat samanlaiset<br />
kuin kirjallisuudessa raportoidut toispuolisen leikkauksen tulokset. Tutkimussarjassa ei<br />
esiintynyt molemminpuolisia komplikaatioita. Potilaat palautuivat leikkauksesta nopeasti<br />
ja kaikki kotiutettiin leikkausta seuraavana päivänä kuten oli suunniteltu. Puolella<br />
potilaista oli tasapainoelinoireita ensimmäisen viikon aikana, mutta oireilla ei ollut<br />
merkitsevää vaikutusta potilaiden päivittäiseen elämiseen. Kaikilla potilailla<br />
tasapainoelinoireet hävisivät ja tasapainolevytulokset palautuivat normaalille tasolle. Jo<br />
kuukausi leikkauksen jälkeen potilaat ilmoittivat elämänlaadun parantuneen merkitsevästi<br />
ja tämä vaikutus säilyi tutkimuksen loppuun saakka. Päiväkirurgiaa selvittävässä<br />
tutkimuksessa (II) potilailla, joille tehtiin stapedektomia, oli merkitsevästi enemmän<br />
lääketieteellisistä syistä johtuvia sairaalaan jäämisiä kuin potilailla, joille tehtiin<br />
stapedotomia (13% vs. 2%). Kaikilla näillä potilailla oli sairaalaan jäämisen syynä<br />
tasapainoelinoireet. Kuitenkin kaikki potilaat voitiin kotiuttaa leikkausta seuraavana<br />
päivänä hyväkuntoisina. Kuulotuloksissa ei ollut eroa päiväkirurgisesti hoidettujen ja<br />
sairaalaan jääneiden välillä. VOG-mittaukset tutkimuksessa III eivät paljastaneet tietyn<br />
tyyppistä nystagmuslöydöstä tasapainoelinoireisilla potilailla. VOG-mittaukset<br />
välittömästi leikkauksen jälkeen osoittivat kuitenkin merkkejä kaarikäytävien ärsytyksestä<br />
33 % potilaista. Puolella potilaista oli subjektiivisesti tasapainoelinoireita, jotka kliinisesti<br />
voitiin arvioida syntyneiksi joko kaarikäytävä- tai otoliittielinärsytyksen takia.<br />
Tutkimuksen I tulosten perusteella voi päätellä, että samanaikainen molemminpuolinen<br />
leikkaaminen on sovellettavissa otoskleroosikirurgiaan. Kuitenkin koska kokemuksia on<br />
kertynyt vasta vähän, tulee samanaikaista molempien korvien leikkaamista tarjota vain<br />
vapaaehtoisille potilaille, joilla korvia ei ole aiemmin leikattu ja anatomia on normaali.<br />
Koska stapedektomia johti merkitsevästi useammin potilaan suunnittelemattoman<br />
jäämisen sairaalaan, on suositeltavaa valita stapedotomia leikkaustekniikaksi<br />
päiväkirurgisiksi suunnitelluilla potilailla. Vaikka välittömästi leikkauksen jälkeisissä<br />
mittauksissa oli löydöksiä kaarikäytävä-ärsytyksestä, tutkimuksissa III tai IV ei löytynyt<br />
tasapainoelinoireisilta potilailta erityistä yhteistä nystagmustyyppiä. Tästä voi päätellä,<br />
että tasapainoelinoireilla on monitahoinen syntymekanismi.<br />
12
1 Introduction<br />
Introduction<br />
Otosclerosis is a disease <strong>of</strong> the otic capsule and middle ear ossicles. It is more common in<br />
Caucasian populations. Histological incidence in Caucasians varies between studies from<br />
3.4% to 13% (Guild 1944, Schuknecht and Kirchner 1975, Hueb et al. 1991, Declau et al.<br />
2007). Histologically, alternating phases <strong>of</strong> bone formation and resorption occur. After<br />
repeated cycles <strong>of</strong> remodelling, highly mineralized sclerotic bone is created. If a<br />
stapediovestibular joint is invaded by the disease, a clinical picture <strong>of</strong> conductive hearing<br />
loss is formed. Only about 10% <strong>of</strong> patients develop clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> with conductive<br />
hearing loss with or without a sensorineural component (Menger and Tange 2003).<br />
Valsalva was the <strong>fi</strong>rst to describe hearing loss due to stapes ankylosis in 1704 (Politzer<br />
1981, Hausler 2007). About 140 years later, Meniere described a patient whose hearing<br />
was temporarily improved by tapping on the stapes with a small gold rod. In the late 19th<br />
century, many surgeons have performed stapes mobilization. However, in 1899, at the 6th<br />
international otology congress, leading otologists <strong>of</strong> the time proclaimed stapes surgery<br />
useless, dangerous and unethical and banned the procedure (Shambaugh and Glasscock<br />
1980, Hausler 2007). Thus, the development <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery halted for 50 years. During<br />
these <strong>fi</strong>ve decades, a fenestration operation for <strong>otosclerosis</strong> was performed. Passow<br />
presented the idea <strong>of</strong> a third window that could be created in the promontory and covered<br />
with tympanic membrane in 1897. It did not become common practise, but did evolve to<br />
the one stage operation <strong>of</strong> semicircular canal fenestration described by Lembert in 1932.<br />
In 1952, while performing Lembert's fenestration operation, Rosen accidentally mobilized<br />
the stapes and rediscovered its positive effect on hearing. The advantages <strong>of</strong> stapes<br />
surgery, as compared with fenestration, were a reduction in the time needed for immediate<br />
recovery and the absence <strong>of</strong> a large postoperative cavity. Stapes surgery once again<br />
became acceptable (Shambaugh and Glasscock 1980, Hausler 2007).<br />
In addition to Rosen’s discovery, innovations in the early 20th century improved operative<br />
results and made more advanced procedures possible. An important technical step forward<br />
was the introduction <strong>of</strong> the electric head light and the <strong>surgical</strong> microscope (Shambaugh<br />
and Glasscock 1980). Another large advance in medicine was the beginning <strong>of</strong> the clinical<br />
use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics in the 1930s' (Huovinen and Vaara 2005).<br />
The era <strong>of</strong> modern stapes surgery began in 1956, when Shea successfully removed stapes<br />
and reconstructed the ossicular chain with a Teflon prosthesis after sealing the oval<br />
window with a thin skin graft (Shea 1956). In 1958, Shea presented a technical note <strong>of</strong><br />
stapedectomy, where the oval window was sealed with vein graft and reconstruction was<br />
performed with the posterior crus <strong>of</strong> stapes or with a polyethylene tube. This new state-<strong>of</strong>the-art<br />
reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the ossicular chain was found to be far superior to the former<br />
mobilization operations, and thus, became the standard. Many modi<strong>fi</strong>cations <strong>of</strong><br />
stapedectomy have been developed using different sealing materials such as fat, fascia,<br />
gelatin foam and perichondrium, and the prosthesis has been constructed with such<br />
material as steel, tantalum, platinum and bone. Some methods were more prone to<br />
13
Introduction<br />
complications, for example the use <strong>of</strong> a polyethylene tube prosthesis and gelatin foam as a<br />
sealing material (Shambaugh and Glasscock 1980, Shea 1988, Hausler 2007). The<br />
fenestration <strong>of</strong> the oval window had also evolved. Partial stapedectomy was suggested by<br />
Plester to diminish inner ear irritation, and by the 1960s small-opening stapedotomy was<br />
also introduced for the same reason (Shea 1988, Hausler 2007). Both techniques, total<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> the footplate (stapedectomy) and small-opening stapedotomy, are still in use<br />
and have proven successful in the long-term restoration <strong>of</strong> hearing (House et al. 2002,<br />
Aarnisalo et al. 2003).<br />
Unfortunately, stapes surgery has a risk <strong>of</strong> inner ear damage, leading to SNHL or balance<br />
problems. Studies presented during the last decades have shown a signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly lower risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> inner ear damage than earlier studies (Ludman and Grant 1973, Daniels et al. 2001,<br />
Vincent et al. 2006). This could be due to technical advancements (laser, microscope,<br />
instruments, prosthesis) in surgery, but the trend favouring stapedotomy may also have an<br />
effect. Formerly, surgery was performed on only one <strong>of</strong> the patient’s ears. This was due to<br />
the risk <strong>of</strong> SNHL which could occur even years after surgery (Ludman and Grant 1973,<br />
Hammond 1976, Smyth et al. 1975). Nowadays, more surgeons are willing to operate on<br />
both sides, probably because <strong>of</strong> the improved safety record <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery (Raut et al.<br />
2002). Simultaneous bilateral surgery has not been reported in stapes surgery, even though<br />
simultaneous surgery in ophthalmology has been performed for decades (Guo et al. 1990,<br />
Beatty et al. 1995, Arshin<strong>of</strong>f et al. 2003, Sarikkola et al. 2004). Both types <strong>of</strong> surgeries<br />
involve major sensory organs and, as such, have a similar pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> complications. If<br />
bilateral complications were to occur for either sense, the result would be a major<br />
deterioration in perception, the only difference being that in the case <strong>of</strong> blindness there are<br />
markedly less opportunities for rehabilitation.<br />
Although sensorineural hearing loss after surgery is unusual, vestibular symptoms after<br />
surgery are very common. Fortunately, vestibular symptoms are usually mild and short<br />
lasting (Aantaa and Virolainen 1978, Birch and Elbrond 1985, Wang et al. 2005). The<br />
exact end organ affected is unknown. The number <strong>of</strong> studies focusing on vestibular<br />
symptoms is limited, despite there being many studies on postoperative hearing. This is<br />
probably because long-lasting symptoms are rare, and these symptoms have not been<br />
shown to be related to hearing results (Aantaa and Virolainen 1978). Naturally, hearing<br />
improvement has been the main interest <strong>of</strong> surgeons and patients. Today's trend towards<br />
outpatient surgery has however, made studies concerning vestibular symptoms more<br />
important. A patient with major postoperative vestibular symptoms cannot be treated as an<br />
outpatient.<br />
This thesis concentrates on three different areas <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery. First, the results <strong>of</strong><br />
simultaneous bilateral stapes surgery are presented and discussed. There is no current<br />
literature addressing this issue. Second the applicability <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery in an outpatient<br />
setting is evaluated, and differences between operative methods are compared. Third,<br />
video-oculography (VOG) is used to investigate the cause <strong>of</strong> vestibular symptoms.<br />
14
2 Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
2.1 De<strong>fi</strong>nition <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
Otosclerosis is a disorder <strong>of</strong> the bony labyrinth and middle ear ossicles (Schuknecht<br />
1974). A distinction should be made between histological (nonclinical) and clinical<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Patients may have histological <strong>otosclerosis</strong> without any clinical symptoms<br />
(Guil 1944). Schuknecht and Kirchner (1974) de<strong>fi</strong>ned clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> as stapes<br />
<strong>fi</strong>xation due to an otosclerotic lesion. In the literature, the term "cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong>" has<br />
an ambiguous meaning. Cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong> can mean the disease has replaced part <strong>of</strong><br />
the endosteal layer <strong>of</strong> cochlear bone (Schuknecht and Kirchner 1974) or it can be used to<br />
describe SNHL assumed to be caused by <strong>otosclerosis</strong> (Balle and Linthicum 1984).<br />
2.2 Histology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
In 1912, Siebenmann, using a microscope, found that patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> presented<br />
with spongiform foci in temporal bone. This is why the term otospongiosis is also used in<br />
literature. In these spongiform lesions, endochondral bone is resorbed by osteoclasts and<br />
osteolytic osteocytes. Lesions extend into the surrounding bone as lacunae. These lacunae<br />
contain a vascular space rich in <strong>fi</strong>broblasts and osteoblasts. Multitinuclear osteoclasts are<br />
also present in the centre and osteolytic osteocytes at the advancing edges. As a result, the<br />
bone is disorganized, containing an enlarged marrow, where new immature bone is<br />
produced and again resorbed. After many remodelling cycles, sclerotic, highly mineralized<br />
bone is created. It has a mosaic-like appearance caused by irregular patterns <strong>of</strong> resorption<br />
and subsequent deposition <strong>of</strong> fatty tissue in marrow spaces. An otosclerotic focus typically<br />
contains areas <strong>of</strong> differing activity (Linthicum 1993, Schuknecht 1974, Declau et al.<br />
2001).<br />
An otosclerotic focus is found only in the temporal bone and middle ear ossicles<br />
(Schuknecht 1974, Wang et al. 1999). Although <strong>otosclerosis</strong> may involve any area <strong>of</strong><br />
temporal bone, the place <strong>of</strong> predilection is in the oval window region. Early studies by<br />
Guil (1944) and Nylen (1949) showed that 80-90% <strong>of</strong> foci occur in this area. Multiple foci<br />
are present in 35-45% <strong>of</strong> ears, but more than three foci are rare. Another common site is<br />
the round window area, which is involved in 30-40% <strong>of</strong> patients (Guil 1944, Nylen 1949).<br />
Otosclerosis may also involve the middle ear ossicles. A solid otosclerotic focus <strong>of</strong> stapes<br />
without involvement <strong>of</strong> the stapediovestibular joint was found in 12% <strong>of</strong> patients in Guil's<br />
(1944) study. An otosclerotic focus in the incus or malleus is rare. A study <strong>of</strong> 144<br />
temporal bones described three instances <strong>of</strong> a malleolar focus and one case involving the<br />
incus (Hueb et al. 1991). Otosclerosis is usually bilateral. Hueb et al. (1991) reported a<br />
bilateral incidence <strong>of</strong> 76%, which is consistent with previous studies (Guil 1944, Nylen<br />
1949).<br />
15
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
The stapes footplate encloses the oval window. The articulation between the footplate and<br />
the oval window is a syndesmotic joint, which is held together by an annular ligament<br />
(Schuknecht 1974). An otosclerotic focus may invade this joint. The process begins with<br />
the calci<strong>fi</strong>cation <strong>of</strong> the ligament, leading to diminished mobility. If the active process<br />
continues, the ligament and joint are replaced by otosclerotic bone, completely<br />
immobilizing the joint. The entire footplate and joint may be replaced, leading to a<br />
"obliterated footplate" (Linthicum 1993). The otosclerotic process may also invade the<br />
cochlea and labyrinth. Atrophy and hyalinization <strong>of</strong> the spiral ligament are seen in areas in<br />
close contact with a lesion. But even in advanced cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, the original<br />
anatomical con<strong>fi</strong>guration <strong>of</strong> the bony labyrinth is usually preserved (Schuknecht 1974,<br />
Linthicum 1993).<br />
2.4 Epidemiology<br />
Histological <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
Otosclerosis is more common in Caucasians than in Black, Asian or Native North<br />
American populations (Guild 1944, Altmann et al. 1967). The incidence <strong>of</strong> histological<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> among Caucasian populations in different studies has varied from 3.4% to<br />
13% (Guild 1944, Schuknecht and Kirchner 1974, Hueb et al. 1991, Declau et al. 2001).<br />
Histological studies have shown a female predominance, with the highest incidence<br />
between the ages <strong>of</strong> 30 and 49 years (Guild 1944, Altmann et al. 1967). In Guilds' (1944)<br />
study, 84 Caucasians under the age <strong>of</strong> 10 years were also included, and two cases <strong>of</strong><br />
histological <strong>otosclerosis</strong> were found in this group. Bilateral involvement was present in<br />
70% <strong>of</strong> the cases, with a noticeable male predominance. Histological <strong>otosclerosis</strong> occurred<br />
bilaterally in 88% <strong>of</strong> male and 44% <strong>of</strong> female patients. This was contrary to the study by<br />
Hueb et al. (1991), who observed bilateral occurrence to be more common among women<br />
(89%) than men (65%). The total incidence <strong>of</strong> bilateral disease, 76%, was in keeping with<br />
Guild's (1944) results. Although discrepancies exist concerning the female:male ratio in<br />
histological studies, the epidemiological results are compelling. In Lithuania, 73% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
974 patients with clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> were females, yielding a ratio <strong>of</strong> 3:1 (Gapany-<br />
Gapanavicius 1975). In Norway, the overall female:male ratio was 3:2, with variation<br />
from 1:1 to 2:1 between different areas <strong>of</strong> Norway (Hall 1974). In a recent study <strong>of</strong> 64 112<br />
patients in Germany between 1993 and 2004, the overall distribution was 1.6:1<br />
(female:male) (Arnold et al. 2007).<br />
16
Clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
According to Altmann et al. (1967), 12% <strong>of</strong> temporal bones with histological <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
also have an ankylosis <strong>of</strong> the stapediovestibular joint. Histological <strong>otosclerosis</strong> was found<br />
in 8.3% <strong>of</strong> the bones. This translates into a prevalence <strong>of</strong> approximately 1% for clinical<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> in the general population. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in<br />
epidemiological studies has been signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly less. Hall (1974) reported a prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
0.3% in the Norwegian general population. Similar results <strong>of</strong> 0.2% and 0.1% have been<br />
observed by others (Pearsson et al. 1974, Gapany-Gapanavicius 1975). Declau et al.<br />
(2001) criticize earlier histological studies because extrapolated clinical prevalences were<br />
not in concordance with epidemiological studies. Declau postulated that temporal bones<br />
used in those studies might be biased, as they were collected on request by an otologist.<br />
There would probably be more otological diseases when compared to the general<br />
population. He collected 118 pairs <strong>of</strong> temporal bones from the allograft temporal bone<br />
bank. Donors ful<strong>fi</strong>lled selection criteria for donating tympano-ossicular grafts, and<br />
because <strong>of</strong> this, 46% <strong>of</strong> bones did not include the stapes footplate. The histological<br />
incidence was 3.4%, which translates into a clinical prevalence <strong>of</strong> 0.3-0.4% when the<br />
<strong>fi</strong>gures from Altmann et al. (1967) are used (Declau et al. 2001).<br />
Although epidemiological studies in Finland have not been done, during 2000-2006 an<br />
annual average <strong>of</strong> 577 patients were hospitalized due to <strong>otosclerosis</strong> (ICD10: H80.0-80.9)<br />
(STAKES 2007). This <strong>fi</strong>gure provides a mean incidence <strong>of</strong> 0.01% for this period. If one<br />
assumes that <strong>otosclerosis</strong> mostly occurs during a 50-year period <strong>of</strong> life, the computational<br />
prevalence would be 0.5%. This is close to the results <strong>of</strong> Vartiainen and Vartiainen<br />
(1997b), who reported a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 0.33% in the Finnish population (living in Kuopio)<br />
born between 1948 and 1962. The mean age at time <strong>of</strong> surgery was between 40 and 50<br />
years in Finland (Vartiainen 1999, Aarnisalo et al. 2003) as well as in Germany<br />
(Niedermeyer et al. 2001). Niedermeyer et al. (2001) also showed a decreased incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> between the ages <strong>of</strong> 20-40, which shifts the patients’ mean age closer to 50<br />
during 1978-1999. No comparable data have been gathered in Finland.<br />
2.3 Aetiology<br />
The aetiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> has not been fully unveiled despite numerous studies.<br />
Epidemiological studies have shown a genetic pattern <strong>of</strong> autosomal dominant inheritance<br />
with reduced penetrance. There are also environmental factors affecting the manifestation<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. The interaction between these factors is very poorly understood. Recent<br />
gene expression analysis <strong>of</strong> human otosclerotic stapedial footplates showed 110 genes that<br />
were expressed differently compared with controls. These genes showed multiple<br />
pathways that could lead to bone remodelling, for example interleukin signalling,<br />
inflammation, p53 signalling, apoptosis, epidermal growth factor receptor signalling and<br />
an oxidative stress response (Ealy et al. 2008). Thus, <strong>otosclerosis</strong> appears to have multiple<br />
aetiologies.<br />
17
Genetic inheritance<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
In epidemiological studies, a familial component has been well established. The majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> epidemiological studies on families with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> suggest autosomal dominant<br />
inheritance with approximately 40% reduced penetrance (Moumoulidis et al. 2007,<br />
Markou and Goudakos 2008). Fowlers’ (1966) study <strong>of</strong> 40 identical twins is considered be<br />
pivotal in demonstrating genetic aetiology. Fowlers found that in all but one case both<br />
twins suffered from clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, and in 40% <strong>of</strong> cases there was a family history <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Current genetic linkage studies have been able to map the presence <strong>of</strong> nine<br />
different loci. But the causative genes associated with these loci have not been identi<strong>fi</strong>ed,<br />
and the molecular process is unknown (Moumoulidis et al. 2007, Markou and Goudakos<br />
2008). Therefore, it is not known whether genetic factors influence the histological<br />
manifestation <strong>of</strong> the disease, the progression to clinical disease, or both. One gene<br />
associated with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is COLA1, the error <strong>of</strong> which leads to osteogenesis imperfecta<br />
(type I). Histological similarities exist between these two entities, and some authors have<br />
suggested that <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is a local manifestation <strong>of</strong> osteogenesis imperfecta (type I)<br />
(McKenna et al. 2002). Although a familial link is well established, 40-50% <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
cases are sporadic (Sabitha et al. 1997, Moumoulidis et al. 2007, Markou and Goudakos<br />
2008).<br />
Viral aetiology<br />
The best-established environmental factor connected to <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is the measles virus.<br />
Viral aetiology was <strong>fi</strong>rst associated with Paget's disease. The similarities between<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> and Paget's disease have led researchers to study the viral aetiology <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> (Mills and Singer 1976). McKenna and Mills (1986) found pleomorphic<br />
<strong>fi</strong>lamentous structures on the otosclerotic focus in an electron microscopy study. These<br />
structures resembled the nucleocapsids <strong>of</strong> subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, a variant <strong>of</strong><br />
the measles virus. Arnold and Friedmann (1987) demonstrated the antigenic expression <strong>of</strong><br />
measles and rubella at the otosclerotic focus, and these results were con<strong>fi</strong>rmed by<br />
McKenna and Mills (1989, 1990). Elevated antimeasles antibodies have been detected in<br />
perilymph samples collected during stapedectomy (Niedermeyer and Arnold 1995). On<br />
the other hand, lower levels <strong>of</strong> circulating antimeasles antibodies have been found in<br />
patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> (Lolov et al. 2001). The former is thought to demonstrate<br />
speci<strong>fi</strong>c immune reactions stemming from the endolymphatic sac, which are evoked by<br />
antigens in the otosclerotic focus near the perilymphatic space (Niedermeyer and Arnold<br />
1995). The latter may demonstrate patients' susceptibility to measles infection or<br />
activation, but whether diminished circulating humoral response is a cause or a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> local measles infection is unclear (Lolov et al. 2001). A speci<strong>fi</strong>c virus has<br />
not been isolated, but measles virus ribonucleic acid (RNA) has been detected within the<br />
otosclerotic focus <strong>of</strong> the stapes footplate. In a study <strong>of</strong> 116 patients with stapedectomy,<br />
Karosi et al. (2007) observed measles virus RNA in all footplates with a histological<br />
focus. There were also 29 stapediovestibular joint <strong>fi</strong>xations where histological<br />
18
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
examination revealed annular stapediovestibular calci<strong>fi</strong>cation or <strong>fi</strong>brosis without<br />
histological otosclerotic focus. These latter specimens and all 25 control bones lacked<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> measles RNA. Similarly, the expression <strong>of</strong> a virus binding receptor (CD46)<br />
was increased substantially in footplates with a histological focus. Measles virus RNA has<br />
been thought to be evidence <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> a vital virus because without active viral<br />
replication, RNA rapidly disintegrates.<br />
Epidemiological reports <strong>of</strong> a decreased incidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> after a measles<br />
vaccination programme also support the presence <strong>of</strong> a viral aetiology (Vrabec and Coker<br />
2004, Arnold et al. 2007). Arnold et al. (2007) presented a study <strong>of</strong> 64 112 patients with<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> in Germany in 1993-2004. He found a signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly decreased incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
hospital <strong>treatment</strong>s for <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in vaccinated patients during this time period as<br />
compared with unvaccinated individuals. The effect was more marked among men than<br />
among women. In Germany, the measles vaccine has been available since 1974 (Arnold et<br />
al. 2007). Paradoxically, there is actually a lower incidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in undeveloped<br />
countries, where measles continues to be widespread (Uzicanin et al. 2002, Tshifularo and<br />
Joseph 2005).<br />
Endocrinological factors<br />
Pregnancy has been suggested to cause onset or progression <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. The incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the disease is more common in women, and some studies have shown that pregnancy<br />
can aggravate symptoms (Precechtel 1967, Gristwood and Venables 1983). Lippy et al.<br />
(2005) criticized former studies for being uncontrolled and lacking age-adjustment. His<br />
age-adjusted study <strong>of</strong> 94 otosclerotic women revealed no negative effect on any outcome<br />
measurements (hearing levels, age at time <strong>of</strong> surgery, incidence) caused by pregnancy<br />
(Lippy et al. 2005). Abnormal parathyroid hormone function is another factor postulated<br />
to be involved in the aetiopathogenesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Grayelin et al. (1999) showed that<br />
expression and function <strong>of</strong> parathyroid hormone receptors in otosclerotic stapes footplates<br />
were lower than in bones collected from the external ear canal. However, in the same<br />
article, he concluded that this is probably not the triggering event in pathogenesis, but a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> abnormal regulation <strong>of</strong> bone matrix protein metabolism caused by another<br />
aetiological factor like measles infection. Similarly, glucocorticoids and the reninangiotensin-aldosterone<br />
system have altering effects on bone remodelling <strong>of</strong> otosclerotic<br />
bone in in vitro studies, but these are more likely to be epiphenomena <strong>of</strong> the disease<br />
(Imauchi et al. 2006, 2008).<br />
Immunological factors<br />
Otosclerosis being an autoimmune disease was suggested by Yoo (1984). He detected<br />
elevated levels <strong>of</strong> the collagen II antibody in otosclerotic patients compared with controls.<br />
In a study <strong>of</strong> rats with lesions resembling human <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, raised titres <strong>of</strong> antibody to<br />
19
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
type II collagen were present after immunization with bovine cartilage collagen (Yoo<br />
1984). Sørensen et al. (1988) found no differences in antibody titres or histological<br />
evidence in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>-like lesions with type II collagen autoimmunity. However, many<br />
researchers have since detected elevated antibody levels (Reshetnikov and Popova 1992,<br />
Bujia et al. 1994, Lolov et al. 1998). Lolov et al. (1998) postulate that the elevated<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> antibodies demonstrate a transient foreign antigen response to antigen turnover<br />
in the active otosclerotic lesion rather than an actual cause <strong>of</strong> the disease. This is supported<br />
by the histological study <strong>of</strong> Niedermeyer (2007) in which 30 footplates were collected<br />
during stapedectomy and compared with 30 control specimens obtained from autoptic<br />
temporal bones. No differences were seen in expression <strong>of</strong> type II collagen, and no<br />
inflammation was present in the cartilage tissue.<br />
Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) is an international designation for the region comprising<br />
the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). By analysing HLA antigenic determinants<br />
<strong>of</strong> the MHC, one can <strong>fi</strong>nd an association between speci<strong>fi</strong>c HLA genotypes and<br />
autoimmune diseases. Once again, there is diversity in the literature concerning<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> and the HLA system (Pedersen et al. 1983, Dahlqvist et al. 1985, Singhal et<br />
al. 1999). No consistent association between these two has been established (Moumoulidis<br />
et al. 2007).<br />
In summary, the aetiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in individual patients remains unveiled in most<br />
cases. Genetic inheritance is demonstrated in about half <strong>of</strong> the cases, but the pathological<br />
process and the influence <strong>of</strong> environmental factors probably vary in different families. The<br />
connection between measles virus and <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is well established. The low incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in undeveloped countries, where measles continues to be widespread,<br />
demonstrates the need <strong>of</strong> genetic susceptibility. At the moment, no reliable connections<br />
exist between environmental or endogenous factors – other than measles virus – and<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Pathological processes other than <strong>otosclerosis</strong> may have biased aetiological<br />
studies if the diagnosis has only been made clinically because in 25% <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />
clinically diagnosed <strong>otosclerosis</strong> treated with stapedectomy, no histological pro<strong>of</strong> for<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> was found (Karosi et al. 2007).<br />
2.5 Clinical <strong>fi</strong>ndings and pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
Conductive hearing loss<br />
In clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, there is conductive hearing loss due to stapes <strong>fi</strong>xation (Schuknecht<br />
and Kirchner 1974). Conductive hearing loss is attributable to decreased motility in the<br />
stapediovestibular joint. At early stages, only low-frequency hearing loss is noticeable.<br />
But if the disease remains active and the footplate becomes increasingly immobile,<br />
20
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
hearing loss will eventually occur across all frequencies. If there is no SNHL, the total<br />
hearing loss due to <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is limited to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 60-65 dB (Maureen 1993).<br />
Sensorineural hearing loss<br />
Otosclerotic patients may also suffer from SNHL. Whether SNHL is connected to<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> is still under debate (Nelson and Hinojosa 2004). Audiological study <strong>of</strong> 122<br />
patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> by Feldman (1960) demonstrated no connection between SNHL<br />
and duration <strong>of</strong> disease when age adjusted presbyacusis was noticed. Since the patients<br />
had no <strong>surgical</strong> interventions, patients without <strong>otosclerosis</strong> may have been included. Many<br />
authors have evaluated long-term hearing results <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> after stapes surgery. Birch<br />
et al. (1986) presented results showing that in a group <strong>of</strong> 925 patients 15 years after<br />
surgery bone conduction decrement was comparable with presbyacusis. These results have<br />
been con<strong>fi</strong>rmed by other authors (Del Bo et al. 1987, Aarnisalo et al. 2003, Vincent et al.<br />
2006). Surgery may affect the inner ear. If postoperative results show more regression<br />
than expected with presbyacusis, the question would be whether this regression is caused<br />
by surgery or by the <strong>otosclerosis</strong> itself. Shin et al. (2001) presented preoperative results <strong>of</strong><br />
437 patients and found a signi<strong>fi</strong>cant correlation between <strong>otosclerosis</strong> with endosteal<br />
involvement and SNHL. Endosteal extension <strong>of</strong> the pericochlear focus was observed by<br />
computed tomography (CT) scan, and clinical diagnosis was con<strong>fi</strong>rmed at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
surgery. Another large study by Topsakal et al. (2006) examined the preoperative hearing<br />
results <strong>of</strong> 1064 patients and found signi<strong>fi</strong>cant SNHL in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> that<br />
exceeded presbyacusis. In all cases, diagnosis was con<strong>fi</strong>rmed during surgery.<br />
Many mechanisms have been suggested to cause SNHL in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. The<br />
earliest <strong>of</strong> these, presented by Siebenmann in 1899, was the suggestion that SNHL was<br />
caused by the liberation <strong>of</strong> toxic metabolites into inner ear (Balle and Linthicum 1984).<br />
Proteolytic enzymes were later detected in inner ear fluids (Chevance et al. 1970, Causse<br />
and Chevance 1978), supporting Siebenmann’s theory. Otosclerosis with endosteal<br />
involvement in the cochlea may lead to the diffusion <strong>of</strong> metabolites harmful to hair cells<br />
into the perilymph (Causse et al. 1989). Other authors have suggested that vascular shunts<br />
between the otosclerotic focus and spiral capillaries leads to venous congestion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
modiolus and distortion <strong>of</strong> the cochlear capsule, with a relaxation <strong>of</strong> the basilar membrane<br />
might be the cause <strong>of</strong> SNHL (Ruedi 1969, Balle and Linthicum 1984). Conflicting results<br />
have emerged concerning the correlation between histological <strong>fi</strong>ndings and hair cell loss<br />
and atrophy <strong>of</strong> cochlear neurons. Histological support for the cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong> theory<br />
is <strong>of</strong>fered by Parahy and Linthicum (1983), who, after analysing 46 otosclerotic bones,<br />
found a signi<strong>fi</strong>cant correlation between active otospongiotic foci and spiral ligament<br />
hyalinization, leading to atrophy <strong>of</strong> stria vascularis. This was supported by Abd el-<br />
Rahman (1990) and Doherty and Linthicum (2004). However, many authors have found<br />
no signi<strong>fi</strong>cant correlation between cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong> and hair cell loss or cochlear<br />
damage (Guil 1944, Elonka and Applebaum 1981, Schuknecht and Barber 1985, Hinojosa<br />
and Marion 1987, Nelson and Hinojosa 2004).<br />
21
Vestibular symptoms<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
There are no characteristic vestibular symptoms in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Cody and Baker (1978)<br />
present an analysis <strong>of</strong> vestibular symptoms in 500 patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Of their<br />
patients, 46% suffered from vestibular symptoms. They identi<strong>fi</strong>ed six different types <strong>of</strong><br />
vertigo. The frequency and severity <strong>of</strong> these symptoms were connected to SNHL. The<br />
most common type was a recurrent attack <strong>of</strong> true vertigo or severe imbalance without a<br />
hallucination <strong>of</strong> motion followed by postural imbalance. Recurrent attacks were usually<br />
associated with nausea and vomiting, typically lasting from one or two hours to several<br />
days. Frequency varied from daily to annually. In these cases, <strong>otosclerosis</strong> was usually<br />
diagnosed with an audiological examination and a CT scan (Cody and Baker 1978). Their<br />
results may have been biased by other otological diagnoses because there were no <strong>surgical</strong><br />
con<strong>fi</strong>rmations and the incidence was higher than in later studies. Aantaa and Virolainen<br />
(1978) reported a prevalence <strong>of</strong> vestibular symptoms <strong>of</strong> only 5%, and Birch (1985) 11% in<br />
a study involving 722 patients. In both <strong>of</strong> these studies, the diagnosis was con<strong>fi</strong>rmed at<br />
surgery. The exact mechanism causing these symptoms has not been de<strong>fi</strong>ned, but Cody<br />
and Baker (1978) hypothesized that it is similar to the mechanism that causes SNHL.<br />
Tinnitus<br />
The prevalence <strong>of</strong> tinnitus in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is reported to be 65-92%<br />
(Gristwood and Venables 2003, Oliviera 2007). A clear relationship has been found<br />
between tinnitus and gender, females more <strong>of</strong>ten being affected (Gristwood and Venables<br />
2003). In addition, in their study <strong>of</strong> 1014 patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, bone conduction and<br />
air-conduction levels were paradoxically connected to tinnitus. Patients with more<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ound hearing loss had a decreased prevalence <strong>of</strong> tinnitus. Other characteristics<br />
investigated (age, duration <strong>of</strong> hearing loss, Schwartze sign, footplate macroscopic<br />
appearance) showed no association with tinnitus. Tinnitus may be present at a low<br />
intensity and with a negligible effect on daily life, but in some cases it can be severely<br />
disabling. Oliviera (2007) used a visual analogue scale (VAS) to quantify intensity.<br />
Intensity values <strong>of</strong> 7-10 demonstrate severe disabling tinnitus (SDT). The term SDT refers<br />
to symptoms suf<strong>fi</strong>ciently severe to disrupt the patient's routine and prevent them from<br />
performing their daily tasks (Shulman et al. 1995). In the study by Oliviera (2007), 40% <strong>of</strong><br />
the 48 consecutive patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> had SDT. The intensity <strong>of</strong> tinnitus was not<br />
signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly related to preoperative hearing results. Females more frequently reported<br />
SDT than males (56% vs. 16%). The mechanism <strong>of</strong> tinnitus according to the<br />
neurophysiological model <strong>of</strong> tinnitus by Jastreb<strong>of</strong>f (1990) is compensatory activity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
neuronal network induced by hearing loss.<br />
22
Otosclerosis and Meniere’s disease<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
An association exist between <strong>otosclerosis</strong> and Meniere’s disease. In histological<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> associated otopathologies in 182 otosclerotic temporal bones, there were<br />
signs <strong>of</strong> endolymphatic hydrops in 37 bones, and in six patients (8 bones) clinical<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Meniere’s disease had been made (Paparella et al. 2007) The causal<br />
relationship between these diseases is still under debate. There are histological reports<br />
showing occlusion <strong>of</strong> the endolymphatic duct due otosclerotic foci, leading to<br />
cochleosaccular hydrops and clinical Meniere’s disease (Franklin et al. 1990, Pollak<br />
2007). Johnsson et al. (1995) have presented histological signs <strong>of</strong> cochleosaccular hydrops<br />
in otosclerotic bones without clear occlusion <strong>of</strong> the vestibular aqueduct, suggesting a<br />
possible immunological or biochemical mechanism. This is supported by Klockars and<br />
Kentala (2007), who in a report <strong>of</strong> two Finnish families, found Meniere’s disease and<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> to be inherited independently. The suggestion was made that these patients<br />
represent different outcomes <strong>of</strong> the same gene mutation. Therefore, cochleovestibular<br />
symptoms <strong>of</strong> a patient with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> may be due to Meniere’s disease, which is either<br />
caused by <strong>otosclerosis</strong> or exists coincidentally.<br />
2.6 Diagnosis<br />
An <strong>of</strong><strong>fi</strong>ce-based otomicroscopic examination may reveal the reddening <strong>of</strong> the promontory,<br />
which is known as the Schwartze sign, and an otherwise normal otoscopy. If the<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> has advanced far enough, tuning fork tests will demonstrate conductive<br />
hearing loss in the affected ear. As stated previously, the patient may have vestibular<br />
symptoms or tinnitus. Most patients will present a history <strong>of</strong> slowly decreased hearing and<br />
possibly a family history (House and Cunningham 2005). A de<strong>fi</strong>nitive diagnosis <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> can only be made during surgery, which allows <strong>fi</strong>xation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stapediovestibular joint to be observed and histological samples to be taken. Karosi et al.<br />
(2007) performed histological examination after 116 stapedectomies, and in 29 cases nonotosclerotic<br />
ankylosis <strong>of</strong> stapediovestibular joint was present. These included 21 annular<br />
stapediovestibular calci<strong>fi</strong>cations and 8 polar joint <strong>fi</strong>broses with a thickened stapedial<br />
mucosal layer. However, these conditions can be successfully treated <strong>surgical</strong>ly. Clinical<br />
evaluations, which are useful and provide support for diagnosis, are discussed in detail<br />
below.<br />
Audiological evaluations<br />
A standard pure-tone audiogram demonstrates conductive hearing loss and possibly<br />
SNHL. If serial audiograms are available, a small air-bone gap is <strong>fi</strong>rst noticed at the lower<br />
frequencies, which will gradually increase and expand through all frequencies over time.<br />
A sensorineural decrease at 2 kHz, called the Carhart notch, is <strong>of</strong>ten found, but it does not<br />
23
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
represent true SNHL, instead being due to a mechanical artefact (Hannley 1993, Probst<br />
2007).<br />
A tympanogram is a graphic representation <strong>of</strong> the change in admittance <strong>of</strong> sound energy<br />
through the middle ear as a function <strong>of</strong> air pressure applied to the sealed ear canal. In most<br />
cases, patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> represent a normal Type A con<strong>fi</strong>guration, where the peak<br />
compliance is +/-100 daPa, since the middle ear aeration is unaffected. However, a<br />
lowering <strong>of</strong> the peak (Type As) as a result <strong>of</strong> stiffening <strong>of</strong> the ossicular chain may occur<br />
(Jerger 1970, Hannley 1993). Stapedius reflex measurements register how the contraction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the middle ear muscle affects transmission ef<strong>fi</strong>ciency. Since clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
partially or totally <strong>fi</strong>xates the stapes, the muscular effect is modulated. Typically, at the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> disease, patients have increased compliance at onset and <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>of</strong> response.<br />
Later, when the stapes has become totally <strong>fi</strong>xed, no change in compliance due to sound<br />
stimulus can be seen. Only <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>of</strong> compliance change is thought to be pathognomonic<br />
for early stapes <strong>fi</strong>xation, otherwise stapedius reflex changes are not distinguishable in<br />
different types <strong>of</strong> hearing loss due to middle ear pathology (Hannley 1993).<br />
During standard tympanometry and stapedius reflex measurements a probe tone frequency<br />
<strong>of</strong> 226 Hz is commonly used. In multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry, a large<br />
range <strong>of</strong> frequencies is used to evaluate the different components <strong>of</strong> middle ear<br />
admittance, especially mass and compliant susceptance. Resonance frequency (RF) is the<br />
frequency at which susceptance due to mass <strong>of</strong> the eardrum and ossicles is equal to<br />
compliant susceptance due to stiffness <strong>of</strong> ligaments and the eardrum. RF has been shown<br />
to increase in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, but results for normal and otosclerotic patients overlap<br />
considerably (Miani et al. 2000). Laser-Doppler vibrometry (LDV) is another method that<br />
uses multiple frequencies for testing middle ear dynamics. In LDV, the vibration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tympanic membrane is evaluated with the aid <strong>of</strong> a laser. This method has shown promising<br />
results for distinguishing stapes ankylosis, malleus <strong>fi</strong>xation and partial or total ossicular<br />
interruption (Huber et al. 2001b, Rososwski et al. 2003). A total <strong>of</strong> 45 patients with<br />
conductive hearing loss were evaluated in these studies. Larger studies have not yet been<br />
presented, and the high price <strong>of</strong> this equipment (70 000 USD, Rososwki et al. 2003) has<br />
probably slowed the introduction <strong>of</strong> this method. Otoacoustic emissions are usually not<br />
present in ears with clinically important conductive hearing loss, but <strong>otosclerosis</strong> cannot<br />
be distinguished from other causes (Zhao et al. 2003).<br />
Radiological evaluations<br />
Although diagnosis <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is based on clinical criteria, CT scan can be used in<br />
unclear cases. Audiometric <strong>fi</strong>ndings may be very similar in Pagets' disease, superior<br />
semicircular canal dehiscence, middle ear malformations, congenital stapes <strong>fi</strong>xation and<br />
tympanosclerosis. CT has proven valuable in differential diagnostics (Mafee et al. 1985,<br />
Belden et al. 2003). High-resolution CT can detect an otosclerotic focus in up to 85% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> (Naumann et al. 2005). The size <strong>of</strong> the otosclerotic focus<br />
24
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
is positively correlated with conductive hearing loss, but cochlear involvement and extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> SNHL do not correlate (Derks et al. 2001, Nauman et al. 2005). Although the CT is the<br />
most valuable radiological examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also<br />
effective in the detection <strong>of</strong> especially active otospongiotic lesions. Lesions in the lateral<br />
wall <strong>of</strong> the labyrinth are sometimes more visible with MRI than with CT, where a partialvolume<br />
effect can be troublesome (Ziyeh et al. 1997). In cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, a mild to<br />
moderate enhancement after gadoliniun administration is frequently seen on T1-weighted<br />
images, but an increased signal might also be seen in T2-images (Ziyeh et al. 1997, Goh et<br />
al. 2002). In a recent case report on the three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion<br />
recovery MRI <strong>of</strong> a patient with SNHL, an enhancement <strong>of</strong> the inner ear fluid after<br />
gadolinium administration was noted. This suggests a breakdown <strong>of</strong> the blood-labyrinth<br />
barrier, which is a potential reason for SNHL (Sugiura et al. 2008).<br />
2.7 Surgical <strong>treatment</strong><br />
<strong>Modern</strong> <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> began in 1956, when Shea reported the<br />
successful total removal <strong>of</strong> stapes (stapedectomy) and replacement with a Teflon<br />
prosthesis after sealing the opening with a tissue graft. In 1958, he presented a <strong>surgical</strong><br />
<strong>treatment</strong> rationale for <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, in which a polyethylene tube was placed over the vein<br />
graft and the other end was stretched to the head <strong>of</strong> the long process <strong>of</strong> the incus. He also<br />
demonstrated the possibility <strong>of</strong> using the posterior crus as a prosthesis over the vein graft.<br />
In this technique, the incudostapedial joint was left intact, but the stapedius tendon was cut<br />
and the posterior crus repositioned to the centre <strong>of</strong> the sealed oval window (Shea 1958).<br />
Schuknecht (1960) introduced a technique in which he used a wire-adipose tissue<br />
prosthesis with a shaft made <strong>of</strong> stainless steel or tantalum and adipose tissue to seal the<br />
oval window. The prosthesis was prepared during the surgery and contained a loop that<br />
attached to the long process <strong>of</strong> the incus. A wire-loop prosthesis is still in use today with a<br />
different sealing material (vein, fascia, perichondrium, fat), but polyethylene tubes are no<br />
longer used owing to the frequency <strong>of</strong> incus erosion and occasional slippage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prosthesis into the vestibule (Rizer and Lippy 1993). The operative technique has evolved<br />
during recent decades towards stapedotomy, where the piston prosthesis is inserted into<br />
the small fenestra <strong>of</strong> the stapes footplate, performed with a micro-drill or laser. This was<br />
preceded by partial stapedectomy, where only part <strong>of</strong> the stapes footplate was removed<br />
together with the superstructure. At present, all techniques (total/partial stapedectomy and<br />
stapedotomy) are used successfully (Rizer and Lippy 1993, House et al. 2002, Aarnisalo et<br />
al. 2003). The operation can be done using either local or general anaesthesia. According<br />
to the national guidelines in Finland, <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> is indicated if the patient has a<br />
mean conductive hearing loss <strong>of</strong> 15 dB (0.5-2.0 kHz) or more, and at the same frequencies<br />
the mean air conduction threshold is 30 dB or more. The Rinne test should be negative.<br />
The patient should be expected to reach a mean postoperative hearing threshold <strong>of</strong> 30 dB<br />
or better or at least a mean threshold within 15 dB <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the better hearing ear<br />
(Laitakari et al. 2005). In this section, the technical aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> and their<br />
effect on outcomes are discussed.<br />
25
Stapedectomy versus stapedotomy<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
Today, stapedotomy is favoured by most surgeons. This method is thought to reduce<br />
trauma to the inner ear and to decrease the risk <strong>of</strong> postoperative vertigo and SNHL (Fisch<br />
1982). Shea (1982) reported that the hearing results <strong>of</strong> stapedotomy were slightly better<br />
than those <strong>of</strong> stapedectomy and concluded that the former is preferable because it is easier<br />
to perform and there are no complications due to migration <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis and/or the<br />
oval window seal. Bailey showed similar results, with reduced postoperative vertigo and<br />
no SNHL with stapedotomy as compared with stapedectomy (Bailey et al. 1983). Rizer<br />
and Lippy criticized the earlier studies because the prosthesis, oval window seal, or<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> the footplate removed is <strong>of</strong>ten changed during follow-up <strong>of</strong> studies. In their<br />
study 225, patients were divided into stapedectomy, partial stapedectomy and<br />
stapedotomy groups. The sealing, prosthesis (Robinson stainless steel piston) and surgeon<br />
were the same in all operations. No signi<strong>fi</strong>cant complications or prolonged hospital stays<br />
occurred in any <strong>of</strong> the groups, but unfortunately, they do not provide details on the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> different complications (Rizer and Lippy 1993).<br />
Although hearing results are good with either technique, they have some characteristic<br />
differences in outcome. Stapedotomy has been shown to give better high-frequency gain<br />
and postoperative speech discrimination scores (Fisch 1982, Bailey et al. 1983, Cremers et<br />
al. 1991, Spandow et al. 2000, Kos et al. 2001). Stapedectomy in turn, may give better<br />
gain at the lower frequencies (Persson et al. 1997, Kos et al. 2001). Most <strong>of</strong> the studies<br />
have demonstrated good short- and/or long-term hearing results, without statistically<br />
signi<strong>fi</strong>cant differences between the techniques (Fisch 1982, Esguivel et al. 2002, House et<br />
al. 2002, Aarnisalo et al. 2003).<br />
Prosthesis<br />
Many recent studies have focused on the diameter <strong>of</strong> the piston prosthesis and hearing<br />
outcome. Diameters less then 0.4 mm are not recommended (Grolman et al. 1997,<br />
Huttenbrink 2003). At the moment, piston prostheses with diameters <strong>of</strong> up to 0.8 mm are<br />
available. Many, but not all, authors have stated that a piston prosthesis with a larger<br />
diameter provides greater hearing improvement, especially at lower frequencies (Fich<br />
1982, Grolman et al. 1997, Shabana et al. 1999, Sennaroglu et al. 2001, Marchese 2007).<br />
These results are expected because a similar suggestion has been made for stapedectomy<br />
and stapedotomy, and this is also supported by mechanical and acoustic models <strong>of</strong> the<br />
human middle ear (Rosowski and Merchant 1995). One explanation for the contradictory<br />
results concerning prosthesis diameter may be found in the effect <strong>of</strong> the tissue seal on the<br />
vibrational energy in the fenestra. The size <strong>of</strong> the fenestra and the sealing material have<br />
not been standardized in most studies (Rosowski and Merchant 1995, Huttenbrink 2003).<br />
The mass <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis has some impact on hearing outcome due to the shift in<br />
resonance frequency. Heavier prostheses (steel, gold) give better results at low frequencies<br />
26
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
and light-weight materials (Teflon) at higher frequencies, but this is <strong>of</strong> negligible<br />
importance in the overall results (Rosowski and Merchant 1995, Huttenbrink 2003).<br />
Another issue <strong>of</strong> great interest is the crimping <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis. Inaccurate crimping may<br />
lead to loose-wire syndrome (LWS). McGee (1981) presented 43 patients with one or<br />
more symptoms from the triad that is typical for LWS (hearing loss, poor speech<br />
discrimination, distortion <strong>of</strong> sound). Symptoms could be temporarily improved by middle<br />
ear inflation. At revision surgery, a loose attachment <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis at the long process<br />
<strong>of</strong> the incus was found. Fear <strong>of</strong> incus erosion or necrosis due to over-crimping is<br />
unwarranted. Lesisnki (2002) evaluated <strong>fi</strong>ndings <strong>of</strong> 260 patients with revision stapes<br />
surgery. Varying degrees <strong>of</strong> incus erosion were found in 91% <strong>of</strong> patients. He observed that<br />
the most likely mechanism for erosion is <strong>fi</strong>xation <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis to the solid otic capsule<br />
bone or residual footplate. Erosion <strong>of</strong> the incus is due to the continuous vibration <strong>of</strong><br />
biological bone against the <strong>fi</strong>xed prosthesis. The mechanism causing prosthesis migration<br />
was found to be contraction <strong>of</strong> the sealing material with a lifting <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis from<br />
fenestration, contraction from adhesions, faulty crimping <strong>of</strong> the incus or use <strong>of</strong> a<br />
prosthesis that was shorter than required (Lesinski 2002). Huber et al. (2003) reported<br />
acoustical-mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> sound transmission at the incus-prosthesis interfaces.<br />
He stated that <strong>fi</strong>rm crimping at two opposite points provided good transmission with the<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> only 3 dB at the interface, an amount similar to a healthy incudostapedial joint.<br />
However, if no <strong>fi</strong>rm crimping was done, losses <strong>of</strong> up to 23 dB in transmission occurred<br />
(Huber et al. 2003). Prostheses with elastic clips and loops with shape-memory have been<br />
developed to help <strong>fi</strong>xation. Hearing results are similar to those for a manually crimped<br />
prosthesis. A longer follow-up study is required to determine whether there is any effect<br />
on postoperative complications (Harris and Gong 2007, Tange and Grolman 2008).<br />
Shea used a Teflon prosthesis in his <strong>fi</strong>rst stapedectomy and also later in stapedotomy<br />
(Shea 1982). The shaft and crimping site were subsequently replaced with thinner<br />
materials, such as platinum and steel, to make insertion <strong>of</strong> a prosthesis possible even<br />
before the stapes arc is removed and to enable the prosthesis to be more adjustable (Fisch<br />
1982, Shea 1988). Pistons made <strong>of</strong> pure gold became available in the 1990s. Pure gold has<br />
antibacterial effects and due its malleability crimping over the incus is easy. Audiological<br />
results are comparable with those <strong>of</strong> other materials, but some reparative granulomas were<br />
seen after surgery (Tange et al. 1998, 2004). A titanium prosthesis is another full-metal<br />
prosthesis with good biocompatibility and very similar hearing results. It is not as<br />
malleable as gold, but this may be an advantage in the case <strong>of</strong> adhesion formation (Tange<br />
et al. 2004). Another bene<strong>fi</strong>t <strong>of</strong> titanium is the shape-memory that allows the use <strong>of</strong> a clip<br />
attachment to the incus (Wengen 2007). Nitinol® is an alloy <strong>of</strong> nickel and titanium.<br />
Teflon pistons with a nitinol loop can be crimped to the incus by heating the loop with<br />
bipolar current bayonet micr<strong>of</strong>orceps, a laser or a special heating device. Preliminary<br />
reports demonstrate that postoperative hearing results are similar to those <strong>of</strong> other<br />
materials (Harris and Gong 2007). No material has been shown to be superior in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
audiological measurements, which is in accordance with acoustic models (Rosowski and<br />
Merchant 1995).<br />
27
Sealing<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
Shea’s method <strong>of</strong> autologous vein graft for sealing the opening <strong>of</strong> the oval window is still<br />
commonly used by many surgeons (Shea 1998, Schmerber et al. 2004, Vincent et al.<br />
2006). Other autologous tissues successfully used for sealing include perichondrium,<br />
fascia, middle ear lining membrane, connective tissue, fat and blood (Schuknecht 1960,<br />
Perkins and Curto 1992, Shea 1998, Schmerber et al. 2004). The results with smallfenestra<br />
stapedotomy are good without any sealing (Somers et al. 1994). Some sealing<br />
materials may produce a <strong>fi</strong>brous reaction that could relocate the prosthesis. Lesinski<br />
(2002) found that thicker collagen sealing leads to greater dislocation, and a vein is the<br />
thinnest material available. Gelfoam®, introduced in the 1960s, is a gelatine sponge<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> puri<strong>fi</strong>ed peptides from porcine skin, producing <strong>fi</strong>brous reactions in a manner<br />
similar to collagenous autologous materials. Gelfoam® has been reported to produces<br />
more labyrinthine <strong>fi</strong>stulas in stapedectomies than other materials, and it is therefore no<br />
longer recommended in stapedectomies (Moon 1970, Sheehy et al. 1981, Shea 1982).<br />
Hearing results using different autologous sealing materials are very similar (Shea 1998,<br />
Schmerber et al. 2004).<br />
Lasers in primary surgery<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> an argon laser was <strong>fi</strong>rst introduced by Perkins (1980). The use <strong>of</strong> lasers in<br />
stapes surgery enables fenestration <strong>of</strong> the footplate without physical contact. This<br />
decreases the risk <strong>of</strong> subluxating the footplate or its fragments to the vestibulum.<br />
However, the inner ear may still be damaged by thermal diffusion or by mechanical<br />
energy originating from the recoil caused by a pressure-driven expulsion <strong>of</strong> the tissue<br />
matrix (Frenz 2007). Argon and potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) lasers both have<br />
wavelengths in the visual range (λ= 488 or 514 µm for argon and 532 µm for KTP) and<br />
are successfully used in stapes surgery (Palva 1987, Silverstein et al. 1989, Causse et al.<br />
1993b, Vincent et al. 2006). Both lasers can be delivered via a <strong>fi</strong>beroptic handpiece, with<br />
the advantage <strong>of</strong> reaching targets that are partially obscured by other structures. Also, with<br />
<strong>fi</strong>beroptic delivery, the power density decreases more rapidly than with a<br />
micromanipulator when the distance from target site is increased (Causse et al. 1993b).<br />
Carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers have also been used successfully in stapes surgery for many<br />
years. This type <strong>of</strong> laser is more readily absorbed by collagen, bone and perilymph,<br />
decreasing the risk <strong>of</strong> direct inner ear trauma from the laser beam because the loss <strong>of</strong><br />
energy is more rapid than with lasers employing a shorter wavelength. However, this leads<br />
to a greater risk <strong>of</strong> heating the perilymph. The risk <strong>of</strong> boiling the perilymph is decreased<br />
by pulsing the laser beam in “micropips” <strong>of</strong> energy – fractions <strong>of</strong> a millisecond in<br />
duration. In contrast to lasers in the visible range (argon and KTP), the CO2 laser needs<br />
another laser beam for targeting, and it cannot be safely delivered using a <strong>fi</strong>beroptic<br />
device. Hearing results with CO2 lasers are comparable with those <strong>of</strong> micro-drill and other<br />
lasers (Lesinsk and Newrock 1993, Motta and Moscillo 2002, Badran et al. 2006). The<br />
erbium yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser is a laser in the infrared area, but with a<br />
28
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
shorter wavelength than a CO2 laser (2.94 µm vs. 10.6 or 9.6 µm). Erbium laser has a very<br />
restricted optical penetration depth in water and so it can be used for extremely precise<br />
ablation <strong>of</strong> tissue and bone – due their high water content – with a limited thermal effect<br />
on the surrounding tissues or liquids. However, since tissue ablation is local and<br />
explosive, it creates greater pressure waves. Because <strong>of</strong> this, stapedotomy with an Er:YAG<br />
laser has shown good long-term results, but bone conduction is depressed immediately<br />
after surgery (Häusler et al. 1999, Huber et al. 2001a). Häusler et al. (1999) reported<br />
depression <strong>of</strong> bone conduction two hours after surgery with an Er:YAG laser, but not<br />
when an argon laser or micro-drill was used. Although bone conduction did recover to the<br />
preoperative level within the <strong>fi</strong>rst six hours following surgery, this initial hearing loss<br />
indicates an increased trauma to the inner ear compared with other techniques.<br />
Laser stapedotomy minus prosthesis (STAMP) was introduced by Silverstein (1998). It is<br />
limited to cases where <strong>otosclerosis</strong> affects only to the anterior part <strong>of</strong> the stapes footplate.<br />
In principle, it is comparable with Fowler’s anterior crurotomy with mechanical footplate<br />
fracture (Fowler 1956), but in STAMP the footplate is cut with a laser. Linear<br />
stapedotomy is done across the anterior part <strong>of</strong> the footplate and the anterior crus is cut<br />
with a laser to separate the <strong>fi</strong>xed anterior section and mobile section <strong>of</strong> the ossicular chain.<br />
This technique had similar early hearing results as conventional surgery, but the incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> revision surgery was 9% during a mean follow-up <strong>of</strong> two years (Silverstein et al. 2004).<br />
Today, lasers are commonly used and give hearing results comparable with other<br />
techniques in primary stapes surgery.<br />
Stapedius tendon preservation<br />
The stapedius reflex protects the inner ear from damage due to strong acoustic stimuli, and<br />
some authors have postulated that the stapedius tendon should be preserved or<br />
reconstructed if possible. The advantage <strong>of</strong> tendon preservation is better speech<br />
discrimination in noisy environments and an increased tolerance for high-amplitude<br />
sounds (Colletti and Fiorino 1994, Causse and Vincent 1997, Silverstein et al. 1999, Gros<br />
et al. 2000). Colletti and Fiorino (1994) showed signi<strong>fi</strong>cant differences in speech<br />
audiometry, with an ipsilateral masking noise favouring tendon preservation in<br />
stapedotomy. Gros et al. (2000) demonstrated a signi<strong>fi</strong>cant 16 dB difference in the<br />
uncomfortable level (UCL) three months after surgery. The stapedius reflex was evoked in<br />
94% <strong>of</strong> patients when the tendon was preserved. An elevated UCL increased the dynamic<br />
hearing range. This makes a hearing aid easier to use if later required due to presbyacusis<br />
or <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Although an audiological bene<strong>fi</strong>t has been demonstrated, most surgeons do<br />
not preserve the stapedius tendon (Vincent et al. 2006).<br />
29
Results <strong>of</strong> primary and revision surgery<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
In stapes surgery, the success rate <strong>of</strong> achieving a postoperative air-bone gap (AB-GAP)<br />
less than 10 dB after primary surgery is close to 95% in larger series (Shea 1998, Vincent<br />
et al. 2006). Shea (1998) reported an AB-GAP <strong>of</strong> less than 10 dB in 95% <strong>of</strong> 5444<br />
stapedectomies one year after operation. The results <strong>of</strong> 3050 stapedotomies with a mean<br />
follow-up <strong>of</strong> four years were reported by Vincent et al. (2006). The overall rate <strong>of</strong> failure<br />
to achieve an AB-GAP under 10 dB was 6.6%, but this rate increased to 12% in the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> obliterative <strong>otosclerosis</strong> and to 35% if simultaneous malleus ankylosis was present. Age<br />
had no impact on outcome; the hearing results <strong>of</strong> children (28 patients under 18 years) and<br />
the elderly (302 patients over 65 years) were comparable with others (Vincent et al. 2006).<br />
Long-term operative results are well maintained. Karhuketo et al. (2007) reported an early<br />
postoperative success for 83% <strong>of</strong> patients (AB-GAP < 20 dB), and a success rate <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />
at 32 years after the operation. The study included stapes mobilizations and many<br />
modi<strong>fi</strong>cations <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery (Karhuketo et al. 2007). Similar long-term results have<br />
been reported by Aarnisalo et al. (2003) and Vincent et al. (2006) with 0.1 dB/year or less<br />
enlargement <strong>of</strong> AB-GAP as a function <strong>of</strong> time. The most common reason for conductive<br />
hearing loss leading to revision is prosthesis migration out <strong>of</strong> the oval window (Sheehy et<br />
al. 1981, Lesinski 2002). Lesinski (2002) stated that 211 (81%) <strong>of</strong> 260 patients with<br />
revision surgery had the prosthesis displaced due to contraction <strong>of</strong> the collagen sealing<br />
material, adhesions or faulty crimping. Other reasons included the prosthesis being too<br />
short (5%), incus dislocation (4%) and incus and/or malleus <strong>fi</strong>xation (6%). A <strong>fi</strong>xed<br />
residual stapes footplate was present in 13% <strong>of</strong> the patients (Lesinski 2002).<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> revision surgery are considerably inferior. Vincent et al. (2006) reported a<br />
55% success rate (AB-GAP within 10 dB) after the <strong>fi</strong>rst revision in 56 patients. Lasers<br />
have proved to be valuable in revision surgery. Lippy et al. (2003) reviewed 522 revision<br />
stapedectomies and found an increase in the success rate from 70% to 80% once an argon<br />
laser became available in their institution. The success rate for achieving an AB-GAP less<br />
than 10 dB was 91% in patients undergoing laser-assisted revision (35 patients). In a metaanalysis<br />
by Wiet (1997), a total <strong>of</strong> 1317 revision operations were evaluated, and 170 <strong>of</strong><br />
these were laser-assisted. The success rate for air-bone closure under 10 dB without a laser<br />
was 51% and with a laser 69%. This difference was signi<strong>fi</strong>cant (p=0.002). Bone<br />
conduction had deteriorated in 2.9% <strong>of</strong> patients treated with the conventional technique<br />
and in 0.5% in the laser group (Wiet et al. 1997). The less favourable outcome <strong>of</strong> revision<br />
surgery is especially related to incus necrosis, multiple revisions and indications other than<br />
conductive hearing loss (De La Cruz and Fayad 2000).<br />
The bene<strong>fi</strong>t <strong>of</strong> surgery not only depends on postoperative AB-GAB but is also affected by<br />
possible SNHL in the ear undergoing the surgery and hearing level in the other ear. Two<br />
commonly used methods to preoperatively estimate the possible outcomes and bene<strong>fi</strong>ts <strong>of</strong><br />
middle ear surgery are the "Belfast rule <strong>of</strong> thumb" and the Glasgow bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot (GBP).<br />
The Belfast rule <strong>of</strong> thumb is based on an analysis <strong>of</strong> 203 patients' personal assessments <strong>of</strong><br />
their own hearing ability compared with the audiological results <strong>of</strong> middle ear surgery.<br />
30
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
The analysis indicated that the patient was likely to report a signi<strong>fi</strong>cant bene<strong>fi</strong>t if the<br />
postoperative hearing level was 30 dB or better (0.5-4 kHz) and the interaural difference<br />
was reduced to less than 15 dB (Smyth and Patterson 1985). With GBP, a surgeon can<br />
more easily audit personal results and make comparisons between series. GBP has also<br />
been used to estimate the bene<strong>fi</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> bilateral surgery (de Bruijn et al. 1999). In GBP, the<br />
ear that has a hearing level better than 30 dB is considered normal or "socially<br />
acceptable", and an interaural difference <strong>of</strong> less then 10 dB is classi<strong>fi</strong>ed as symmetric<br />
(Browning et al. 1991). Toner and Smyth (1993) compared these two methods in<br />
agreement with patients' assessments. The Belfast rule <strong>of</strong> thumb was in agreement with<br />
patients' assessment in 78% <strong>of</strong> cases and GBP in 62% <strong>of</strong> cases. If normal hearing level<br />
with signi<strong>fi</strong>cant bene<strong>fi</strong>t was dropped to 40 dB in GBP, there was 71% agreement with<br />
patients' assessments (Toner and Smyth 1993). Recently, Schmerber et al. (2008)<br />
presented a new method for bene<strong>fi</strong>t assessment, the quartile bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot (QBP). In QBP,<br />
two additional evaluation criteria have been included in GBP, namely absence <strong>of</strong><br />
postoperative SNHL (over 10 dB at 4 kHz) and closure <strong>of</strong> AB-GAP under 10 dB. In their<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> 132 bilaterally operated patients, the estimated success rate with GBP was<br />
52% and with QBP signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly less (39%). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the agreement between QBP<br />
and patients' personal hearing assessments was not done (Schmerber et al. 2008).<br />
Some patients suffer from very disturbing tinnitus. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> tinnitus in patients<br />
with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is 65-92% (Gristwood and Venables 2003, Oliviera 2007). Causse and<br />
Vincent (1995) present a complete recovery from tinnitus in 3-78% <strong>of</strong> patients one year<br />
postoperatively, depending on the frequency <strong>of</strong> the tone, high-pitched tinnitus being more<br />
resistant. The most recent studies do not con<strong>fi</strong>rm this. Gersdorf et al. (2000) found that<br />
tinnitus ceased or improved in 80% <strong>of</strong> patients and had worsened in 6% (three patients)<br />
one year after the operation. Pitch <strong>of</strong> tinnitus did not predict outcome, but the more<br />
complete closure <strong>of</strong> AB-GAP and the use <strong>of</strong> a small-fenestra technique were factors<br />
related to good prognosis. Ayeche et al. (2003) reported similar results, with 88% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients experiencing a postoperative improvement in tinnitus. They found no factors<br />
predicting the course <strong>of</strong> tinnitus after surgery. The risk for escalation <strong>of</strong> tinnitus after<br />
surgery is reported to be 1.3-10.8% in the literature (Ayeche et al. 2003). The positive<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> surgery on tinnitus seems to be long-lasting. In a study <strong>of</strong> 246 patients’<br />
symptoms during a mean follow-up <strong>of</strong> 56 months postoperatively, an improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
tinnitus was found in 81% <strong>of</strong> the patients (Ramsay et al. 1997).<br />
Surgical <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
If a patient has hearing loss on both sides that exceeds <strong>surgical</strong> criteria, it is generally<br />
accepted that surgery should be <strong>fi</strong>rst performed on the side with experiencing the greater<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> hearing loss. Some authors have argued against performing surgery on the<br />
second ear due to the possibility <strong>of</strong> bilateral vestibular damage and the risk <strong>of</strong> SNHL,<br />
which can occur years after the surgery (Ludman and Grant 1973, Smyth et al. 1975,<br />
Hammond 1976). Nowadays, most surgeons will perform surgery on the second ear.<br />
31
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
However, there is no consensus on how long one should wait after a <strong>fi</strong>rst successful ear<br />
surgery before operating on the second ear. Raut et al. (2002) report on the management <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> in the United Kingdom, where 75% <strong>of</strong> surgeons operated on both sides, but<br />
the duration between the surgeries varied between 1 and 180 months (median 24 months).<br />
Successful surgery on both ears gives the patient binaural hearing with the ability to<br />
localize sound (Porter et al. 1995, de Bruijn et al. 1998, 1999). Furthermore, De Bruijn et<br />
al. (1998) published a disability-oriented evaluation <strong>of</strong> bilateral stapedotomy. Both<br />
binaural hearing impairment (BHI) and the percentage <strong>of</strong> impairment <strong>of</strong> the whole person<br />
(IWP) are signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly decreased after the <strong>fi</strong>rst surgery and again after surgery on the<br />
second ear, showing the importance <strong>of</strong> binaural hearing for the individual.<br />
In recent years, the number <strong>of</strong> surgeons willing to operate on both ears has increased (Raut<br />
et al. 2002). This is probably due to the positive long-term results <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery<br />
without any increase in the risk <strong>of</strong> complications after surgery on the second ear (Faye-<br />
Lund et al. 1984, Mann et al. 1996, House et al. 2002, Aarnisalo et al. 2003). The results<br />
<strong>of</strong> bilateral surgery in other areas <strong>of</strong> medicine, such as ophthalmology, orthopaedics and<br />
thorax and vascular surgery, may have encouraged otosurgeons. In those specialties,<br />
simultaneous bilateral surgery has been introduced with success. Vision and hearing are<br />
important elements <strong>of</strong> our perception, and therefore, the complication pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> eye<br />
surgery is similar to that <strong>of</strong> ear surgery. However, there is less <strong>of</strong> an opportunity for<br />
rehabilitation if vision is lost. Bilateral surgery in one session has been successfully<br />
introduced in cataract surgery. The simultaneous bilateral approach has been used in<br />
ophthalmology for two decades (Guo et al. 1990, Beatty et al. 1995, Arshin<strong>of</strong>f et al. 2003,<br />
Sarikkola et al. 2004). Simultaneous bilateral joint replacement surgery is also<br />
increasingly performed (Huotari et al. 2007). Huotari et al. (2007) evaluated the results <strong>of</strong><br />
710 simultaneous bilateral hip or knee arthroplasties and 9121 unilateral surgeries. There<br />
was no increased risk <strong>of</strong> postoperative infection when bilateral surgery was performed. In<br />
thorax and vascular surgeries, simultaneous bilateral thoracotomy has been introduced<br />
with less morbidity and shorter hospital stays than staged operations in paediatric<br />
populations (Kougias et al. 2007). Simultaneous surgeries <strong>of</strong> the major arteries and<br />
coronary arteries have been introduced successfully in vascular surgery (Zarroug et al.<br />
2006). Bilateral cochlear implantation in the case <strong>of</strong> bilateral sensorineural deafness has<br />
recently been debated. Bilateral implantation gives the advantages <strong>of</strong> bilateral hearing, but<br />
arguments against bilateral operations have included the fear <strong>of</strong> bilateral vestibular<br />
damage and the possibility <strong>of</strong> preserving the contralateral ear for future rehabilitative<br />
methods. Gantz et al. (2002) placed cochlear implants bilaterally during the same<br />
operation in outpatient settings. There was no nystagmus or complaints <strong>of</strong> vertigo after<br />
surgery. Patients recovered from the surgery similarly to those <strong>of</strong> unilateral approach, and<br />
9 out <strong>of</strong> 10 patients were treated as outpatients. A recent review article by Papsin and<br />
Gordon (2008) evaluated the current literature and recommended simultaneous bilateral<br />
implantation for children as a standard. Simultaneous bilateral mastoidectomy has had<br />
good postoperative results in selected cases (Klemens et al. 2007). However, Klemens'<br />
survey exploring the opinions <strong>of</strong> 452 otologists, members <strong>of</strong> the American Neurotology<br />
Society, revealed a strong aversion to performing bilateral, simultaneous mastoidectomy.<br />
32
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
Twenty-eight (23%) <strong>of</strong> the 121 responders replied "absolutely not" to simultaneous<br />
surgery, and only about half <strong>of</strong> the otologists found some indications for the simultaneous<br />
approach (Klemens et al. 2007). No reports <strong>of</strong> simultaneous bilateral stapes surgery exist<br />
in the literature.<br />
Cochlear implantation<br />
An indication for cochlear implantation in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is pr<strong>of</strong>ound bilateral SNHL. In<br />
very far-advanced <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, stapedotomy and rehabilitation with a hearing aid are<br />
normally the initial <strong>treatment</strong>, because these are simple, safe and low-cost procedures.<br />
Patients should be informed that there is the possibility that the surgery may not be<br />
suf<strong>fi</strong>cient to improve hearing to a level that would be effective with a hearing aid. If<br />
satisfactory hearing is not achieved, cochlear implantation is the next option (Glasscock et<br />
al. 1996, Khalifa et al. 1998, Calmels et al. 2007). Hearing results <strong>of</strong> cochlear implantation<br />
in otosclerotic patients are comparable with those for other indications (Ruckenstein et al.<br />
2001, Mosnier et al. 2007). Operative problems may be encountered due to changes in<br />
anatomical contour <strong>of</strong> the otic capsule. A relatively high number <strong>of</strong> partial insertions and<br />
misplacements <strong>of</strong> the electrode array demanded revision surgery (8% <strong>of</strong> patients) in a<br />
multicentre study by Rotteveel et al. (2004). A greater number <strong>of</strong> facial nerve stimulations<br />
were found in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> (38%) than in reports in the general literature<br />
(0.9%-14.6%). This increased incidence is thought to be due to a lowered electrical<br />
impedance <strong>of</strong> the bone caused by disease or reduced distance from the electrode to the<br />
facial nerve because <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> bone and cavity formation (Rotteveel et al. 2004).<br />
2.8 Complications<br />
Perioperative complications<br />
Perioperative complications include tympanic membrane perforation, but this does not<br />
preclude completion <strong>of</strong> the operation. A simultaneous myringoplasty with tissue graft is<br />
recommended, although some otologists leave it to heal without <strong>treatment</strong> (Causse and<br />
Causse 1980a, Wiet et al. 1993). During surgery, the ossicles may be dislocated due to<br />
manipulation. If the incus is subluxated, its anatomical position needs to be restored before<br />
completing the surgery. Some physicians prefer to wait several months to allow the<br />
incudomalleal joint to re-<strong>fi</strong>xate before prosthesis insertion. The incus can also be bypassed<br />
with malleostapedoplasty. The stapes footplate may be mobilized, leading to a "floating<br />
footplate", and attempts to remove it may submerge the footplate or its parts in the<br />
vestibulum (Causse and Causse 1980a, Wiet et al. 1993). Nowadays, with the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> lasers and small-opening stapedotomy being performed, ossicular problems are more<br />
easily avoided. A "gusher" is a situation where there is pr<strong>of</strong>use flow <strong>of</strong> perilymph and<br />
33
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
cerebrospinal fluid immediately after opening the oval window. Gushers are relatively<br />
rare, with an incidence <strong>of</strong> 0.03%, and are more common in congenital footplate <strong>fi</strong>xation.<br />
A widened cochlear aqueduct or internal auditory canal are potential connections to<br />
intracranial spaces through which fluid may emerge. The opening should be sealed with<br />
tissue graft and insertion <strong>of</strong> a prosthesis, rather than packing the middle ear without<br />
restoring the ossicular chain. Head elevation and CSF lumbar drain also relieve<br />
perilymphatic pressure (Causse and Causse 1980a, Wiet et al. 1993).<br />
Sensorineural hearing loss<br />
The most worrisome complication is SNHL. Ludman and Grant presented an evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
139 patients with bilateral stapedectomies in 1973. In this group, there was a total <strong>of</strong> 322<br />
stapes operations, 3.4% <strong>of</strong> which resulted in dead ears during the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative year,<br />
and another seven cases occurring at a later point, three occurring more than six years after<br />
the surgery. An analysis <strong>of</strong> 1681 stapes operations performed by Jean Marquet<br />
between1961 and 1991 showed a 0.9% (23 cases) rate <strong>of</strong> severe SNHL, half <strong>of</strong> these<br />
having a hearing level <strong>of</strong> less than 80 dB. Nine cases appeared during <strong>fi</strong>rst the<br />
postoperative year, and the remaining occurred up to 11 years after the surgery (Somers et<br />
al. 1994). Both <strong>of</strong> these studies included revision surgeries, and the operative protocol had<br />
evolved greatly over the years. In Vincents’ (2006) report <strong>of</strong> 3050 stapedotomies<br />
performed between 1991 and 2004, SNHL was seen in 0.5% <strong>of</strong> the patients (13/2525<br />
patients). There were two dead ears (0.07%) and the rest suffered from an SNHL <strong>of</strong> 15-55<br />
dB. The incidence <strong>of</strong> SNHL was considerably greater (4.8%) when obliterative<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> was found during surgery. Another large study reports on bilateral partial<br />
stapedectomy performed by William Lippy on 1800 patients between 1974 and 1998. No<br />
dead ears resulted, but the incidences <strong>of</strong> other SNHLs were not reported (Daniels et al.<br />
2001). Although the incidence <strong>of</strong> SNHL has been reduced in more recent studies, in which<br />
stapedotomy has usually been the preferred technique, comparative studies have shown no<br />
differences between stapedectomy and stapedotomy. Long-term reports have<br />
demonstrated that bone conduction deteriorates at a rate similar to that <strong>of</strong> presbyacusis<br />
with both stapedectomy and stapedotomy (House et al. 2002, Aarnisalo et al. 2003,<br />
Vincent et al. 2006).<br />
In histological examinations, the reactions leading to SNHL are found to be hydrops<br />
formation, atrophy <strong>of</strong> scala media due to fluid imbalance, adhesion formation in the<br />
vestibulum, perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stula, granulation formation, acoustic trauma due to extensive<br />
drilling and labyrinthitis (aseptic or suppurative). The cochlea may be traumatized as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> direct trauma from instruments or bone fragments. Also, a sudden release <strong>of</strong><br />
enzymes into the inner ear from the active otosclerotic focus is postulated to be a cause <strong>of</strong><br />
SNHL (Shucknecht 1962, Linthicum 1971, Causse 1980). In the case <strong>of</strong> postoperative<br />
SNHL, corticosteroids, vasodilatators, antibiotics, carbogen (5% carbon dioxide and 95%<br />
oxygen) and sodium fluoride have been used as conservative <strong>treatment</strong>s (Causse 1980,<br />
Mann et al. 1996). In Causse’s (1980) review <strong>of</strong> 1160 patients, slightly more than 2%<br />
34
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
demonstrated SNHL, but this was permanent in only 0.2% <strong>of</strong> cases. The most common<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> SNHL was prosthesis displacement further into the vestibulum due to negative<br />
ear pressure in the middle ear, found in 2% patients. Symptoms were similar to Meniere’s<br />
syndrome, including tinnitus, vestibular symptoms and SNHL at low frequencies. The<br />
<strong>treatment</strong> was oral corticosteroids and active aeration <strong>of</strong> the middle ear. The same triad <strong>of</strong><br />
symptoms is seen in patients with a sudden release in perilymph pressure during surgery<br />
in patients with simultaneous endolymphatic hydrops and <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. However, these<br />
patients do not respond as well to <strong>treatment</strong>. The <strong>treatment</strong> protocol for these patients<br />
includes bedrest with the head elevated to 30º for two days and corticoids and intravenous<br />
osmotic agents. Another two aetiological factors for SNHL suggested by Causse (1980)<br />
were impaired cochlear blood flow and the sudden release <strong>of</strong> enzymes into the perilymph.<br />
Surgical intervention for postoperative SNHL is recommended in the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>fi</strong>stula or<br />
granulation formation and if an excessively long prosthesis penetrates too deeply into the<br />
vestibulum (Seicshnaydre et al. 1994, Mann et al. 1996).<br />
Perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stula<br />
In a perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stula (PLF), fluid leaks from the inner ear, leading to a disturbance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cochlear and vestibular function. Some leakage always occurs during stapedectomy, and if<br />
this persists, the <strong>fi</strong>stula is referred to as a primary <strong>fi</strong>stula, but if it occurs after the window<br />
has been successfully sealed for a period <strong>of</strong> time, it is called a secondary <strong>fi</strong>stula. Moon<br />
(1970) explored 49 perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stulas after stapedectomy and the most common symptom<br />
was disequilibrium, which was present in 77% <strong>of</strong> primary and 61% <strong>of</strong> secondary <strong>fi</strong>stulas.<br />
Hearing loss was found in 71% and 77% <strong>of</strong> cases (primary/secondary), and almost half <strong>of</strong><br />
the patients suffered from tinnitus. Fistulas were more common when polyethylene tube<br />
prosthesis and gelatin foam sealant were used. Other factors contributing to <strong>fi</strong>stula, include<br />
the displacement or poor <strong>fi</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis (Moon 1970, Sheehy et al. 1981, Shea 1982).<br />
Althaus and House (1973) report a <strong>fi</strong>stula incidence <strong>of</strong> 89/15648 cases, or 0.6%, from<br />
stapes surgery. More than half <strong>of</strong> these (57%) were in ears that received a polyethylene<br />
tube prosthesis. An evaluation <strong>of</strong> 20 893 stapedectomies with a living tissue graft and a<br />
Teflon prosthesis revealed a PLF incidence <strong>of</strong> 0.02% (Causse and Causse 1980b). Some<br />
authors have even favoured the use <strong>of</strong> no sealing agent. Five cases <strong>of</strong> secondary <strong>fi</strong>stulas<br />
occurring with a mean delay <strong>of</strong> <strong>fi</strong>ve years were found in 1911 stapedotomies without<br />
sealing performed by Marquet (Somers et al. 1994). Clinically, inner ear hydrops present<br />
symptoms similar to PLF. In differential diagnostics, the CT can be helpful if fluid in the<br />
middle ear and/or pneumolabyrinth is shown. These are suggestive <strong>of</strong> PLF (Ayache et al.<br />
2007). The results <strong>of</strong> revision surgeries due to PLF are poor. In Moon’s (1970) study,<br />
hearing afterwards was worse or immutable in 43% <strong>of</strong> patients, 25% still suffered from<br />
tinnitus and 8% continued to have vestibular symptoms.<br />
35
Reparative granuloma<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
The incidence <strong>of</strong> reparative granuloma has been estimated to be 0.1% after stapedectomy<br />
and 0.07% after stapedotomy (Seicshnaydre et al. 1994). If a granuloma invades the<br />
vestibulum after an initial period <strong>of</strong> hearing improvement, there is either gradual or sudden<br />
deterioration 1-6 weeks postoperatively. The tympanic membrane may show a reddish<br />
discoloration in the posterosuperior quadrant. Patients present with SNHL and/or<br />
conductive hearing loss. They may have vestibular symptoms (Kaufman and Schuknect<br />
1967, Gacek 1970). The aetiology initiating granuloma formation has not been<br />
determined. It is thought that this is the tissue’s reaction to glove powder, sealing material,<br />
prosthesis, inner ear fluid leaking from the PLF or overuse <strong>of</strong> lasers (Seicshnaydre et al.<br />
1994). Delivery <strong>of</strong> gastric content into the middle ear as a result <strong>of</strong> postoperative nausea<br />
has also recently been proposed as a possible reason for granuloma formation (Batman et<br />
al. 2007). The incidence is greater if gelatin foam or fat is used as a sealant. No consensus<br />
exist on the <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> reparative granuloma. Some authors recommend conservative<br />
<strong>treatment</strong> with steroids and antibiotics (Hough and Dyer 1993), but early <strong>surgical</strong><br />
intervention combined with steroids is recommended by most otologists (Gacek 1970,<br />
Seicshnaydre et al. 1994, Fenton et al. 1996).<br />
Vertigo<br />
The early prevalence <strong>of</strong> vertigo is quite common, with an incidence <strong>of</strong> up to 45%<br />
postoperatively in earlier reports (Birch and Elbrond 1985, Wang et al. 2005).<br />
Spontaneous or positional nystagmus was measured with electronystagmography in 73%<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients one week after surgery (Fisch 1965). There is a wide range in the incidence in<br />
the literature, probably due to different grading and nomenclature <strong>of</strong> vertigo. There may<br />
also be differences in how patients are mobilized postoperatively. In objective<br />
measurements, the equipment varies and the criteria for pathological nystagmus may also<br />
differ. Long-lasting vestibular symptoms are rare, and in most cases symptoms disappear<br />
during the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative week (Birch and Elbrond 1985, Causse et al. 1988, Wang et<br />
al. 2005). In a study <strong>of</strong> 722 patients, 37% suffered from postoperative vertigo, but in only<br />
4%, did this last for more than four weeks. In the same study, after a mean follow-up <strong>of</strong> 15<br />
years, 17% (58/347) <strong>of</strong> patients showed an abnormal caloric test, and twenty-one patients<br />
had complete canal paresis (Birch and Elbrond 1985). Thus, a signi<strong>fi</strong>cant number <strong>of</strong><br />
patients developed permanent vestibular hyp<strong>of</strong>unction, which was rapidly compensated.<br />
Causse (1988) presents a number <strong>of</strong> aetiological factors that may affect the vestibular<br />
apparatus. These are similar to those thought to lead to SNHL, namely proteolytic<br />
enzymes, antigen-antibody reaction, disturbed labyrinth fluid pressure and diminished<br />
blood supply to the labyrinth. To prevent the influx <strong>of</strong> enzymes and/or antigens into the<br />
inner ear fluid, the anterior part <strong>of</strong> the footplate, which is the most common site for<br />
otosclerotic focus, should be left intact (Causse et al. 1988). Anatomically, the utricle and<br />
saccule are located close to the stapes footplate, and the prosthesis may mechanically<br />
36
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
disturb these structures. This might be due to insertion <strong>of</strong> a prosthesis that is too long or to<br />
adhesions or negative middle ear pressure forcing the prosthesis deeper into the inner ear.<br />
Membranous connections are also found between the stapes footplate and the utricle in a<br />
one-quarter <strong>of</strong> otherwise normal temporal bones, and breakage <strong>of</strong> these might be one<br />
cause for vestibular symptoms (Backous et al. 1999). In Wang’s (2005) report <strong>of</strong> the<br />
microanatomy <strong>of</strong> the vestibulum, the mean distance between the undersurface <strong>of</strong> the<br />
footplate and the saccule was 1.1 mm (SD=0.48 mm), and between the footplate and the<br />
utricle 1.67 mm (SD=0.31 mm). Previous studies <strong>of</strong> Caucasian populations have provided<br />
similar results <strong>of</strong> the microanatomy <strong>of</strong> the vestibular area (Pauw et al. 1991, Backous et al.<br />
1999). There is a cleft between the utricle and the saccule located along the vertical plane<br />
<strong>of</strong> the anterior crura, with a 45-60º angle facing the saccule. A modi<strong>fi</strong>ed piston prosthesis<br />
with a slope <strong>of</strong> 45º at its tip to adapt to the anatomical con<strong>fi</strong>guration <strong>of</strong> the vestibulum was<br />
compared with the conventional piston by Wang et al. (2005). When the modi<strong>fi</strong>ed<br />
prosthesis was used, the incidence <strong>of</strong> vertigo was signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly decreased and<br />
postoperative symptoms were milder and alleviated faster. Similarly, the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
spontaneous nystagmus and its mean slow phase velocity were reduced in the group<br />
receiving the modi<strong>fi</strong>ed piston (Wang et al. 2005). However, these results have not been<br />
con<strong>fi</strong>rmed by other authors and are not in concordance with studies on objective<br />
evaluations <strong>of</strong> the saccule after stapes surgery, in which vestibular evoked myogenic<br />
potentials (VEMP) originating from the saccule did not decrease after surgery (Singbartl et<br />
al. 2006, Stapleton et al. 2008).<br />
Taste disturbance<br />
The chorda tympani nerve (CTN) is within the operative <strong>fi</strong>eld and it is usually necessary<br />
to manipulate it in order to achieve free access to the oval window. Patients with an injury<br />
to the CTN present with symptoms <strong>of</strong> a metallic or sweet taste and numbness or tingling<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tongue (Mahendran et al. 2005). In a study <strong>of</strong> 55 stapedotomies by Mahendran et al.<br />
(2005), the CTN was transected in 22 cases and preserved in 33 cases. In patients in whom<br />
the CTN was transected, 95% complained <strong>of</strong> symptoms, and in patients in whom the nerve<br />
was preserved 52% had symptoms. If the CTN was transected, the symptoms were more<br />
severe and long-lasting. Although electrogustometry showed total loss <strong>of</strong> chorda function<br />
in almost every instance where the nerve was transected after a postoperative mean <strong>of</strong> 38<br />
months, only half <strong>of</strong> the patients had mild to moderate symptoms for more than six<br />
months (Mahendran et al. 2005).<br />
Facial paresis<br />
There are two types <strong>of</strong> facial palsy after stapes surgery: immediate, due to local<br />
anaesthetic or direct trauma to the nerve, and delayed. Local anaesthetic may produce<br />
facial palsy that resolves within hours. The risk <strong>of</strong> direct trauma increases if there is an<br />
anomalous course <strong>of</strong> the facial nerve, but normally it should be easy to avoid (Wellin et al.<br />
37
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
1992). The aetiology for delayed facial palsy is probably reactivation <strong>of</strong> the herpes<br />
simplex or varicella zoster virus. Shea and Ge (2001) found 11 cases <strong>of</strong> delayed facial<br />
palsy after 2152 stapedectomies, thus an incidence <strong>of</strong> 0.5%. Delayed facial palsy occurred<br />
anywhere from 5 to 16 days postoperatively. Serological evaluations were done in six<br />
cases and anti-varicella antibody titres were elevated in all <strong>of</strong> these. Anti-herpes antibody<br />
titres were also elevated in all but one case. A similar incidence <strong>of</strong> 0.5% was presented by<br />
Smith et al. (1990) for six cases out <strong>of</strong> more than 1300 uncomplicated stapedectomies. A<br />
bony facial canal dehiscence with bare or bulging facial nerve and chorda tympani nerve<br />
manipulation may potentially predispose to this type <strong>of</strong> complication. Because <strong>of</strong><br />
postulated viral aetiology, anti-viral medication is proposed for the <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> delayed<br />
facial palsy. Some authors have also suggested the use <strong>of</strong> prophylactic anti-viral<br />
medication for patients with a history <strong>of</strong> herpes labialis reactivation or immunodepression<br />
(Shea and Ge 2001, Salvinelli et al. 2004).<br />
Suppurative labyrinthitis and meningitis<br />
Because the inner ear is opened during surgery, there is a potential risk for microbial<br />
colonization, especially if PLF persists. Suppurative labyrinthitis leads to loss <strong>of</strong> hearing<br />
with a risk <strong>of</strong> meningitis. Fortunately, both are rare complications in the era <strong>of</strong><br />
stapedotomy with only a single report in the literature (Nielsen and Thomsen 2000).<br />
Infection commonly occurs in the early phases <strong>of</strong> healing, but delayed meningitis may also<br />
arise from secondary PLF (Snyder et al. 1979, Jablokow and Kathuria 1982, Nielsen and<br />
Thomsen 2000). Most surgeons postpone surgery if a patient has a respiratory tract<br />
infection, and some physicians recommend the use <strong>of</strong> prophylactic antibiotic for surgery<br />
(Causse et al. 1983). Studies on the use <strong>of</strong> prophylactic antibiotic in uncontaminated ear<br />
surgery have demonstrated no signi<strong>fi</strong>cant effect, and this practice is therefore not generally<br />
recommended (Govaerts et al. 1998, Verschuur et al. 2004). Animal studies have shown<br />
an increased risk <strong>of</strong> SNHL after stapedotomy in ears with otitis media by Pseudomonas<br />
aeruginosa. This effect was not seen in otitis media with Streptococcus pneumoniae.<br />
However, the risk for suppurative complications increased in all animals with otitis media<br />
(Falcone et al. 2003).<br />
Radiological evaluation <strong>of</strong> postoperative SNHL<br />
CT is the primary method for imaging after stapes surgery when aetiology for SNHL is<br />
being assessed. CT can show conditions requiring prompt <strong>surgical</strong> management, such as<br />
PLF, granuloma formation and an excessively long prosthesis penetrating too deeply into<br />
the vestibulum (Seicshnaydre et al. 1994, Mann et al. 1996, Ayache et al. 2007). If CT<br />
does not provide <strong>fi</strong>ndings that contribute to the diagnosis, MRI may give additional<br />
information. Intralabyrinthine reparative granuloma or labyrinthitis are not visible or may<br />
yield non-speci<strong>fi</strong>c <strong>fi</strong>ndings in CT. However, both are seen in MRI with extensive<br />
enhancement in post-contrast T1-weighted images and with hypointensity in T2-weighted<br />
38
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
images. Intralabyrinthine haemorrhage gives a high signal in both T1- and T2-weighted<br />
images, but is undetectable with CT (Ayache et al. 2007). Safety <strong>of</strong> MRI in patients with<br />
metallic implants has been a concern because implants may move or become heated<br />
during imaging. However, although prostheses made from low-magnetic stainless steel did<br />
move in highly magnetized <strong>fi</strong>elds, this was not clinically or statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant in in<br />
vivo measurements in cadaveric temporal bones when 4.7 T MRI was used. This is<br />
because the mass <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis is small, and it has a three-dimensional bony <strong>fi</strong>xation<br />
when placed in a small-fenestra stapedotomy (Williams et al. 2001).<br />
2.9 Conservative <strong>treatment</strong><br />
Hearing aid<br />
Most patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> can be rehabilitated with the use <strong>of</strong> a hearing aid. Simple<br />
ampli<strong>fi</strong>cation <strong>of</strong> sound produces good results in cases without SNHL because there is no<br />
regression <strong>of</strong> speech discrimination (Johnson 1993). Thus, before surgery, this possibility<br />
should also be discussed with the patient. The use <strong>of</strong> a hearing aid is preferred if the<br />
patient refuses surgery or if there is an increased risk associated with surgery. If hearing<br />
without the use <strong>of</strong> a hearing aid cannot be achieved postoperatively and patient can be<br />
rehabilitated successfully with a hearing aid, surgery should not be executed. On the other<br />
hand, if a patient has far-advanced <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, rehabilitation with a hearing aid may not<br />
be successful. The term "far-advanced <strong>otosclerosis</strong>" was introduced by House and Sheehy<br />
(1961) to describe clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> with a non-measurable bone conduction level and<br />
an air conduction level <strong>of</strong> 85 dB or greater. Most <strong>of</strong> these patients bene<strong>fi</strong>t from stapes<br />
surgery in that they are able to achieve a level <strong>of</strong> hearing that can be rehabilitated with a<br />
hearing aid (Glasscock et al. 1995, Khalifa et al. 1998, Calmels et al. 2007).<br />
Medical <strong>treatment</strong><br />
Medications that suppress bone remodelling in the temporal bone would probably have a<br />
bene<strong>fi</strong>cial effect on <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Sodium fluoride is in clinical use, but bisphosphonates<br />
and cytokine inhibitors have also been suggested to have an effect on active <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
(Chole and McKenna 2001). One two-year prospective, double-blind study with<br />
bisphosphonates found no signi<strong>fi</strong>cant effect on hearing (Kennedy et al. 1993). Brookler<br />
and Tanyeri (1997) evaluated the effect <strong>of</strong> etidronates in a retrospective case review <strong>of</strong><br />
896 otosclerotic patients with primary neurotological symptoms <strong>of</strong> dizziness, tinnitus,<br />
SNHL and/or Meniere’s syndrome. Patients were treated primarily with sodium fluoride,<br />
but if the <strong>treatment</strong> was ineffective or not tolerated by the patient, etidronate was<br />
introduced. They concluded that etidronate is more effective than sodium fluoride alone,<br />
but the study lacked a control group, was not blinded and the results did not include a<br />
39
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
statistical analysis. No clinical studies are available on the use <strong>of</strong> cytokine inhibition in<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> fluoride as a <strong>treatment</strong> for <strong>otosclerosis</strong> was <strong>fi</strong>rst suggested in 1964 by<br />
Shambaugh and Scott. Fluoride was thought to bene<strong>fi</strong>t by neutralizing proteolytic<br />
enzymes in spongiotic bone or by interfering with the calcium/phosphate ratio in bone<br />
with reduced remodelling activity (Bretlau et al. 1981, Causse et al. 1993a). In a doubleblind,<br />
placebo-controlled study, 40 mg <strong>of</strong> sodium fluoride daily signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly decreased<br />
deterioration <strong>of</strong> hearing compared with placebo. The study included 95 patients who were<br />
followed up for two years (Bretlau et al. 1981). Derks et al. (2001) found no difference<br />
between a four-year and one- to two-years <strong>treatment</strong> with fluoride, and there was<br />
signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly less deterioration in bone conduction at all frequencies compared with<br />
patients receiving no <strong>treatment</strong>. The dosage was 75 mg <strong>of</strong> sodium fluoride or 152 mg <strong>of</strong><br />
sodium mon<strong>of</strong>luorophosphate daily. Vartiainen and Vartiainen (1996, 1997a, 1997b)<br />
evaluated the effect <strong>of</strong> low-dosage sodium fluoride intake (1-3 mg/daily) from fluoridated<br />
tap water comparing patients living in areas with natural water with very low sodium<br />
fluoride content. Low-sodium fluoride intake was ineffective in preventing <strong>otosclerosis</strong>,<br />
but if patients developed <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, a low dosage <strong>of</strong> fluoride from tap water had a<br />
bene<strong>fi</strong>cial effect on hearing deterioration in non-operated ears. This bene<strong>fi</strong>t was not seen<br />
after stapedectomy (Vartiainen and Vartiainen 1996, 1997a, 1997b). Although fluoride has<br />
been shown to have bene<strong>fi</strong>cial effect on <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, the optimal dosages and <strong>treatment</strong><br />
remain to be elucidated.<br />
40
3 Aims <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
Aims <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
1. To evaluate the applicability <strong>of</strong> simultaneous bilateral surgery for patients with bilateral<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
2. To compare the suitability <strong>of</strong> stapedectomy and stapedotomy as outpatient surgeries.<br />
3. To investigate changes in vestibular function in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, especially<br />
after surgery.<br />
41
4 Materials and methods<br />
Materials and methods<br />
This thesis consists <strong>of</strong> four original studies that evaluate and discuss <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Three major aspects <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery were evaluated, namely, simultaneous<br />
bilateral surgery, outpatient surgery and vestibular effects <strong>of</strong> the surgery. In the following<br />
sections, the design and execution <strong>of</strong> each study are described. Methods are given in detail<br />
in the original papers (I-IV).<br />
4.1 Study design<br />
Study I<br />
Patients with suf<strong>fi</strong>cient bilateral conductive hearing loss were informed about the study in<br />
writing. Patients interested in participating had a preoperative appointment with the<br />
surgeon and were scheduled for either a standard unilateral or an experimental<br />
simultaneous bilateral stapes surgery according to the patient’s preferences. During the<br />
pilot stage, eight patients suffering from bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong> and one from osteogenesis<br />
imperfecta were included. After results <strong>of</strong> the pilot study were analysed, another nine<br />
patients with bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong> were included and the results <strong>of</strong> these two groups were<br />
evaluated one year postoperatively. Outcome measures included a standard audiogram and<br />
a vestibular assessment with visual feedback posturography (VFP). Patients estimated<br />
their own hearing improvement, intensity <strong>of</strong> vestibular symptoms and quality <strong>of</strong> life with a<br />
questionnaire over follow-up period (Appendix 1).<br />
Study II<br />
Ninety-four consecutive patients with outpatient stapes surgery were retrospectively<br />
analysed. All surgeries were initially scheduled as outpatient procedures. All patients were<br />
carefully assessed to rule out any cardiovascular, pulmonary or metabolic disorders,<br />
particularly severe diabetes. Mild cardiovascular problems or diabetes were not a<br />
contraindication for outpatient surgery. To be included, the patient had to live within 50<br />
kilometres <strong>of</strong> the hospital and had to have someone to escort them from the hospital and<br />
someone who to take care <strong>of</strong> them at home overnight. An equal number <strong>of</strong> patients (n=47)<br />
were included in the stapedotomy and stapedectomy groups. Total stapedectomy was done<br />
if a laser was unavailable and in two cases with an unintended fracture <strong>of</strong> the footplate. An<br />
argon laser was used in all stapedotomies. Each patient's pain and vestibular symptoms<br />
were clinically evaluated during hospitalization. The reasons for needing to spend the <strong>fi</strong>rst<br />
postoperative night in hospital were then analysed. Audiological measurements were<br />
performed three months postoperatively to evaluate the differences between these two<br />
operative methods.<br />
42
Studies III and IV<br />
Materials and methods<br />
These two studies differ from each other mainly in the timing <strong>of</strong> the VOG measurements.<br />
Study III included 33 patients scheduled for a stapedotomy due to <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, and Study<br />
IV included 21 patients scheduled for a stapedotomy or tympanoplasty with the objective<br />
<strong>of</strong> opening the oval window. In Study III, in four <strong>of</strong> the cases, the other ear had already<br />
been operated on due to <strong>otosclerosis</strong>, and in one case both ears had been operated on, but<br />
revision surgery was necessary. In Study IV, two patients had staged tympanoplasty after<br />
primary cholesteatoma surgery, and one patient had fractured stapes crura caused by head<br />
trauma. All other operations were due to <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. In all cases, the inner ear fluid<br />
compartment was opened during surgery. Five patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> had their other<br />
ear operated on previously, and for one patient the surgery was a revision <strong>of</strong> a previous<br />
procedure. Both studies were prospective, and VOG was recorded during standard pre-<br />
and postoperative visits. The patients did not have any other neurotological diseases or<br />
medications. In Study III, eye position curves were recorded with VOG preoperatively as<br />
well as at one week, one month and 3-4 months postoperatively. Data about subjective<br />
vestibular symptoms were collected during every visit using a questionnaire (Appendix 1).<br />
In Study IV, VOG was measured, on average, four hours after the surgery. VOG<br />
measurements are described later in the VOG section and in the original papers.<br />
Postoperative hearing was assessed, and the associations between vestibular symptoms,<br />
hearing results and VOG <strong>fi</strong>ndings were evaluated.<br />
4.2 Surgery<br />
In Study I, the general anaesthetic was used for all patients. The <strong>surgical</strong> approach was<br />
either transcanal (26 ears) or endaural (10 ears). Special care was taken to avoid<br />
postoperative infection. All patients had a single dose <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime 1.5 g or ceftriaxone 2<br />
g as an antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery. The same surgeon operated on both ears,<br />
and dressings and instruments were changed after surgery on the <strong>fi</strong>rst ear was concluded.<br />
The second side was then prepared for surgery. Stapedotomy was done using a laser (5<br />
ears) or a micro-drill (31 ears). In two cases, a partial stapedectomy was performed<br />
because <strong>of</strong> an unintended fracture <strong>of</strong> the footplate. Patients received prostheses selected<br />
from different manufacturers or quality lots on each side in order to minimize the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
infection or other mechanical complications due to the prosthesis. Titanium (n=30) or steel<br />
(n=6) piston prostheses with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 0.4-0.6 mm were used. All prostheses were<br />
crimped manually to the long process <strong>of</strong> the incus. After inserting the prosthesis, the<br />
opening on the footplate was sealed with small pieces <strong>of</strong> fascia or with blood. All patients<br />
were treated as inpatients.<br />
In Study II, a Schucknecht piston with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 0.6 mm was placed over the fascia<br />
after the complete removal <strong>of</strong> the footplate in the total stapedectomy group. In the<br />
stapedotomy group, the same prosthesis was inserted using an argon laser-made fenestra.<br />
43
Materials and methods<br />
A drop <strong>of</strong> blood was used as a sealing material after stapedotomy. All surgeries were<br />
performed with local anaesthesia using an endaural incision.<br />
Study III included 29 stapedotomies done with a laser (21 ears) or a micro-drill (8 ears). In<br />
four cases, a partial stapedectomy was performed due to an unintended fracture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
footplate. Piston prostheses were applied and small pieces <strong>of</strong> fascia (n=19), fat (n=3), or<br />
blood (n=11) were used as a sealant. All but one patient received local anaesthesia. In<br />
Study IV, 19 <strong>of</strong> the procedures were performed using a local anaesthetic, and in two cases<br />
a general anaesthetic was preferred by the patient. The <strong>surgical</strong> approach was either<br />
transcanal (18 ears) or endaural (3 ears). Stapedotomy was performed with a laser on four<br />
patients and with a micro-drill on 16 <strong>of</strong> the patients. A titanium piston prosthesis with a<br />
diameter <strong>of</strong> 0.4-0.6 mm was applied and small pieces <strong>of</strong> fascia or blood were used as a<br />
sealant. One patient had cholesteatoma, which had previously been operated on and the<br />
ossicular chain had been reconstructed with incus interposition. The interpositioned incus<br />
was removed and the stapes footplate was found to be mobile but fractured. A<br />
reconstruction was done using a titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis and<br />
cartilage. Three patients in Study III and one in Study IV lived alone and were scheduled<br />
as inpatients, but all other patients were scheduled as outpatients.<br />
4.3 Objective measurements and analysis<br />
Video-oculography<br />
Eye movements were recorded using a rubber mask-mounted video camera in a dimly lit<br />
room (Figure 1). The other eye was either uncovered, allowing vision, or covered. Eye<br />
position curves for horizontal and vertical planes were calculated by using s<strong>of</strong>tware (2D<br />
VOG, Version 3.0, Sensomotoric Instruments, Berlin, Germany). The recordings were<br />
also stored on a standard VHS videotape, allowing visual evaluation <strong>of</strong> the rotatory<br />
component. The nystagmus was characterized by maximal slow phase velocity (SPV) and<br />
direction.<br />
During the VOG, the patients were prone and their heads were faced straight ahead. We<br />
<strong>fi</strong>rst recorded spontaneous nystagmus with one eye uncovered. We then measured<br />
spontaneous nystagmus with the gaze forward, the gaze approximately 30 º to the left or<br />
right, and after 20 seconds <strong>of</strong> passive head shaking with the eyes covered. In Study IV, the<br />
head shaking provocation was not done. Each test condition lasted 30 seconds, and for a<br />
positive <strong>fi</strong>nding, at least <strong>fi</strong>ve nystagmus beats were required. The limit for an abnormal<br />
SPV was 1 º/s for horizontal and 2 º/s for vertical components <strong>of</strong> spontaneous nystagmus.<br />
After head shaking, the corresponding normal limits were 6.1 and 6.8 º/s. The normative<br />
values were based on a previous study <strong>of</strong> healthy persons using the same equipment (Levo<br />
et al. 2004).<br />
44
Materials and methods<br />
Study III included 33 patients. On 11 <strong>of</strong> these patients, preoperative VOG was performed.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the patients had VOG measurements taken at one week (27 patients) and one<br />
month (28 patients) after the operation. Nineteen <strong>of</strong> the patients were also measured 3-4<br />
months postoperatively. Patients in Study IV had a single recording on average four hours<br />
postoperatively.<br />
Visual feedback posturography<br />
The vestibular function <strong>of</strong> patients with bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong> was measured using visual<br />
feedback posturography (VFP) in Study I. The VFP equipment was a custom-made force<br />
platform described in detail in Hirvonen et al. (2002) (Figure 2). While standing on the<br />
platform, the patient’s center <strong>of</strong> gravity (COG) was calculated and movement <strong>of</strong> the COG<br />
marker was displayed on a computer screen. Patients were instructed to move their COG<br />
marker by leaning their body as fast and as accurately as possible to given targets shown<br />
one at a time on the computer screen. A balance index (BI) was calculated by dividing hit<br />
delay (s) to the targets with hold percentage (%) within the targets. VFP was performed<br />
preoperatively as well as at one week, three months and one year after surgery. According<br />
to our previous study, a BI ≤ 2.5 s/% is considered normal (Hirvonen et al. 2002).<br />
Audiogram<br />
The audiological examinations were carried out using a clinical audiometer, calibrated<br />
according to ISO standards. Mean thresholds at frequencies <strong>of</strong> 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz were<br />
used to calculate four-tone pure-tone average (PTA). Air conduction (PTA-AC) and bone<br />
conduction (PTA-BC) thresholds were recorded, and the air-bone gap (AB-GAP) was<br />
calculated. The postoperative AB-GAP was calculated by subtracting the postoperative<br />
BC from the corresponding AC. To analyse possible inner ear damage, mean preoperative<br />
BC at 1, 2 and 4 kHz minus postoperative BC values was used to calculate overclosure in<br />
Studies I, III and IV. Speech discrimination audiograms were performed pre- and<br />
postoperatively in Study I.<br />
Statistical analysis<br />
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 11.0 or later s<strong>of</strong>tware (SPSS Inc.,<br />
Chicago, IL, USA), and a p-value <strong>of</strong> ≤0.05 was considered statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant.<br />
Audiometric data were analysed using paired Student’s t-test (I-II) or paired Wilcoxon<br />
signed-rank test (IV) to compare results within groups. An unpaired t-test (II) or nonpaired<br />
Mann-Whitney test (IV) was used to compare differences between groups. For noncontinuous<br />
parameters, Kendall’s W-test was used in Study I and Mann-Whitney U-test in<br />
Studies II and III. In Study IV, χ2 -test was used to compare the prevalence <strong>of</strong> nystagmus<br />
45
Materials and methods<br />
between the study group and control group detailed elsewhere (Levo et al. 2004). The<br />
correlation between prevalence <strong>of</strong> nystagmus and vestibular symptoms was analysed with<br />
Spearman’s correlation test.<br />
4.4 Ethical aspects<br />
The Ethics Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Helsinki</strong> University Central Hospital approved all <strong>of</strong> study<br />
protocols, and each patient provided written consent to participate in studies where<br />
required (I, III and IV). In Study II, only patients treated as inpatients provided written<br />
informed consent.<br />
Figure 1. A rubber mask-mounted video camera used in VOG.<br />
46
Materials and methods<br />
Figure 2. Visual feedback posturography equipment.<br />
47
5 Results and comments<br />
Results and comments<br />
5.1 Simultaneous bilateral surgery (I)<br />
One year after the surgery, the mean improvement in PTA-AC was 18 dB (range 1-41<br />
dB), with a mean PTA-AC <strong>of</strong> 25 dB (range 13-46 dB). The AB-GAP was within 10 dB in<br />
81% (29/36) and PTA-AC within 30 dB in 75% (27/36) <strong>of</strong> the ears. Table 1 summarizes<br />
the hearing results <strong>of</strong> both sides, with no statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant postoperative differences<br />
between the ears. A preoperative difference between ears was present, and the worse ear<br />
was operated on <strong>fi</strong>rst, as in the unilateral standard protocol. After surgery, none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients had signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly (15%) lowered speech discrimination scores or had suffered<br />
signi<strong>fi</strong>cant (over 10 dB) sensorineural hearing impairment. Subjectively, 72% (13/18) <strong>of</strong><br />
the patients assessed their own hearing as good or excellent one year after surgery. The<br />
remaining 28% reported moderate hearing ability after one year. The mean hearing score<br />
improved signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly from a preoperative value <strong>of</strong> 2.3 to 4.1 (p
Results and comments<br />
improved signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly, from a preoperative score <strong>of</strong> 3.4 to 1.3 at the end <strong>of</strong> the study, one<br />
year after the surgery (p30 dB 6 (33) 3 (17)<br />
Postoperative SDS in % (range) 99 (92-100) 98 (84-100)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> patients with revision 0 1<br />
Table 2. Subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> general health on the quality <strong>of</strong> life on a<br />
<strong>fi</strong>ve-point qualitative scale. *Signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly different from preoperative condition<br />
(p
5.2 Outpatient surgery (II)<br />
Results and comments<br />
Eleven (12%) <strong>of</strong> 94 patients had to stay overnight at hospital. Two <strong>of</strong> the patients who had<br />
undergone stapedotomy were required to stay at hospital because they otherwise would<br />
have been alone during the night following surgery. One patient from both groups was<br />
required to stay due to surgery that had been scheduled late in the day. Only seven patients<br />
(7%) had a medical reason for inpatient <strong>treatment</strong>. These seven patients experienced<br />
vestibular symptoms and nausea; six belonged to the stapedectomy group and one to the<br />
stapedotomy group. Vestibular symptoms diminished during the night following surgery,<br />
and all patients were discharged on the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative day. The differences in<br />
outpatient failure due to vestibular symptoms were signi<strong>fi</strong>cant (p=0.05) between the two<br />
groups.<br />
Hearing results were similar in both groups, with no signi<strong>fi</strong>cant differences in mean results<br />
or in individual frequencies (Table 3). A postoperative AB-GAP <strong>of</strong> less than 10 dB was<br />
achieved in 70% (33/47) <strong>of</strong> stapedectomy patients and in 83% (39/47) <strong>of</strong> stapedotomy<br />
patients. Two patients (4%) had an AB-GAP over 20 dB in the stapedectomy group and<br />
one (2%) in the stapedotomy group. Outpatient failure had no impact on hearing results.<br />
After surgery, no patients suffered from signi<strong>fi</strong>cant (over 10 dB) SNHL. Five patients<br />
(11%) had mild SNHL (5-8 dB) in the stapedectomy group compared with only two (4%)<br />
in the stapedotomy group (6 and 7 dB). The groups did not differ signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly (p=0.24)<br />
from one another.<br />
Statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant differences were present in outpatient failures due to vestibular<br />
symptoms, but hearing results did not differ between the groups. Both techniques can be<br />
used successfully, but stapedotomy is the preferred method in an outpatient setting.<br />
50
Results and comments<br />
Table 3. Hearing thresholds (dB) for stapedectomy and stapedotomy patients. AC=air<br />
conduction, BC=bone conduction, GAB=AC-BC, GAIN=preGAP-postGAP, Mean= the<br />
mean <strong>of</strong> 0.5 - 4 kHz.<br />
Stapedectomy group<br />
Frequency Preoperative Postoperative<br />
(kHz) AC BC GAP AC BC GAP GAIN<br />
0.125 51.5 26.8<br />
0.25 53.0 6.3 46.6 26.3 7.9 18.4 28.2<br />
0.5 52.9 19.0 33.9 24.5 15.5 9.0 24.9<br />
1 53.4 26.6 26.8 27.0 19.3 7.7 19.1<br />
2 47.2 36.3 10.9 31.0 28.3 2.7 8.2<br />
4 50.2 26.6 23.3 39.7 29.1 10.6 12.7<br />
8 48.6 53.8<br />
Mean 50.9 27.1 23.8 30.6 23.1 7.5 16.3<br />
Stapedotomy group<br />
Frequency Preoperative Postoperative<br />
(kHz) AC BC GAP AC BC GAP GAIN<br />
0.125 55.7 27.3<br />
0.25 57.2 8.4 48.8 26.7 9.0 17.7 31.1<br />
0.5 56.7 21.0 35.7 25.9 18.4 7.5 28.2<br />
1 54.9 25.3 29.6 26.4 19.1 7.3 22.3<br />
2 49.0 37.6 11.4 30.0 27.9 2.1 9.3<br />
4 51.7 27.6 24.1 39.1 27.8 11.3 12.8<br />
8 51.4 54.8<br />
Mean 53.1 27.9 25.2 30.4 23.3 7.1 18.2<br />
51
Results and comments<br />
5.3 Video-oculography studies (III, IV)<br />
Long-term evaluation (III)<br />
Three (27%) <strong>of</strong> the 11 patients measured preoperatively had spontaneous nystagmus with<br />
an SPV <strong>of</strong> 1.3-3.3 º/s when the eyes were covered. There was no preoperative headshaking<br />
nystagmus (HSN) in any <strong>of</strong> the patients. After the operation, 11-15% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients had HSN (SPV 6.6-17.8 º/s), but statistically, this was not signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly different<br />
from the preoperative level (p=0.18). None <strong>of</strong> the patients had spontaneous nystagmus<br />
when <strong>fi</strong>xation was allowed. The number <strong>of</strong> patients with nystagmus and the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />
nystagmus are shown in Table 4.<br />
Nine patients (27%) experienced some vestibular symptoms, especially during rapid head<br />
or body movements during the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative week. One <strong>of</strong> these patients had nausea<br />
and vomiting during the <strong>fi</strong>rst week. Only three <strong>of</strong> these patients had pathological <strong>fi</strong>ndings<br />
in the VOG. Two patients had horizontal HSN (SPV 11.1 º/s and 8.9 º/s). One patient had<br />
horizontal nystagmus that followed Alexander’s law for peripheral nystagmus, with an<br />
increasing SPV (2.4-6.7 º/s) when the gaze was in the same direction as the nystagmus. In<br />
all <strong>of</strong> these patients, the nystagmus was directed away from the operated ear. There were<br />
also four patients with pathological horizontal spontaneous nystagmus who experienced<br />
no vestibular symptoms. Three <strong>of</strong> these patients had nystagmus directed towards the<br />
operated ear and in one patient it was directed away from the operated ear. The remaining<br />
patients who experienced HSN (SPV 13.3 º/s) towards the operated ear had no vestibular<br />
symptoms.<br />
After one month, only one patient (3%) had subjective vestibular symptoms. This patient<br />
still reported minor dizziness <strong>fi</strong>ve months after the operation, but only during rapid head<br />
movements. She had horizontal nystagmus beating away from the operated side after head<br />
shaking, with an SPV <strong>of</strong> 8.8 º/s, which appeared in the VOG recordings one month after<br />
the surgery.<br />
After one month, three patients (11%) had spontaneous horizontal nystagmus (SPV 1.3-<br />
3.8 º/s), and in all cases it was directed away from the operated ear. Two <strong>of</strong> these patients<br />
had vertically oriented nystagmus without a horizontal component one week following<br />
surgery. One <strong>of</strong> these was the patient with nystagmus that followed Alexander’s law one<br />
week after operation who now had spontaneous nystagmus with an SPV <strong>of</strong> 1.3 º/s. Two<br />
patients had HSN, but no vestibular symptoms one month after the operation. One <strong>of</strong> these<br />
had no nystagmus one week after the operation, but did experience vestibular symptoms at<br />
that time. She now had HSN with an SPV <strong>of</strong> 8.9 º/s directed away from the operated ear.<br />
The second one had HSN with an increased SPV <strong>of</strong> 17.8 º/s (13.3 º/s one week<br />
postoperatively) directed towards the operated ear.<br />
52
Results and comments<br />
A <strong>fi</strong>nal follow-up visit was held 3-4 months postoperatively. Only one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
aforementioned patients still suffered from vestibular symptoms. Two patients (11%) had<br />
spontaneous horizontal nystagmus, one beating towards the operated ear with an SPV <strong>of</strong><br />
1.3 º/s and the other beating away from the operated ear with an SPV <strong>of</strong> 2.7 º/s. The latter<br />
also had HSN directed towards the operated ear. It evolved postoperatively with an SPV<br />
<strong>of</strong> 13.3-17.8-7.3 º/s. Another patient had HSN beating away from the ear, which was<br />
operated on, diminishing SPV to 6.6 º/s. The number <strong>of</strong> patients that had vertically<br />
oriented nystagmus was equal when comparing pre- and postoperative results.<br />
Postoperatively, there was no change in the direction <strong>of</strong> the nystagmus in any patient.<br />
Torsional nystagmus was not found pre- or postoperatively.<br />
Three (33%) <strong>of</strong> the patients suffering from vestibular symptoms during the <strong>fi</strong>rst<br />
postoperative week had had previous middle ear surgery on the other ear due to<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Two <strong>of</strong> the four patients whose planned stapedotomy was converted to a<br />
stapedectomy had vestibular symptoms one week after the operation, in one case lasting<br />
throughout the study period. However, neither the second ear operation or stapedectomy<br />
for technical reasons (p=0.06) nor the use <strong>of</strong> a laser instead <strong>of</strong> a micro-drill (p=0.07)<br />
presented a statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant risk for experiencing postoperative vertigo.<br />
Audiological measurements were done 3-4 months postoperatively. The postoperative<br />
average for the AB-GAP diminished to 6 dB (range 0-31 dB) from a preoperative value <strong>of</strong><br />
25 dB (range 7-47 dB). The average overclosure was 4 dB (range -7-18 dB). A<br />
postoperative AB-GAP under 10 dB was achieved in 76% (25/33) and a AB-GAP under<br />
20 dB in 94% (31/33) <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
No signi<strong>fi</strong>cant correlation between vertigo and type <strong>of</strong> nystagmus was found. Vestibular<br />
symptoms seem to be more prevalent in a second ear operation and with stapedectomy,<br />
but the difference was not statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant. Vestibular symptoms were mild and<br />
usually short-lasting, consistent with previous reports.<br />
53
Results and comments<br />
Table 4. The number and percentage <strong>of</strong> patients with different planes <strong>of</strong> pre- and<br />
postoperative nystagmus recorded while the eyes are covered. Percentage values are<br />
calculated from all patients recorded for that time period. HSN=head-shaking nystagmus.<br />
Nystagmus Spontaneous HSN<br />
Preoperative Horizontal 1 (9%) 0<br />
Vertical 1 (9%) 0<br />
Both 1 (9%) 0<br />
One week postoperative Horizontal 4 (15%) 3 (11%)<br />
Vertical 1 (4%) 1 (4%)<br />
Both 1 (4%) 0<br />
One month postoperative Horizontal 2 (7%) 3 (11%)<br />
Vertical 1 (4%) 0<br />
Both 1 (4%) 0<br />
3-4 months postoperative Horizontal 2 (11%) 1 (5%)<br />
Vertical 1 (5%) 1 (5%)<br />
Both 0 1 (5%)<br />
Short-term evaluation (IV)<br />
In this study, VOG was measured on average four hours (range 1.5-6 hours) after the<br />
operation. No nystagmus was found when <strong>fi</strong>xation was allowed, and three patients (14%)<br />
had pathological nystagmus when the eyes were covered. Two patients had spontaneous<br />
horizontal nystagmus with an SPV <strong>of</strong> 1.9 º/s and 1.5 º/s. In both cases, the fast phase<br />
beated away from the operated ear, and with the latter patient there was also a minute<br />
torsional component. The third patient had vertical nystagmus with a maximum SPV <strong>of</strong><br />
2.2 º/s, and the fast phase beated upwards. The nystagmus was persistent when the other<br />
eye was covered. These patients did not complain <strong>of</strong> any postoperative vertigo or nausea.<br />
Seven patients had latent, spontaneous horizontal nystagmus that manifested during the<br />
lateral gaze in the direction <strong>of</strong> the fast phase only, with a gaze angle <strong>of</strong> less than 30 º. One<br />
patient had an upbeating component related to the horizontal nystagmus, and the<br />
remaining patients had primary horizontal nystagmus with an SPV between 1 and 3 º/s<br />
accompanied by a minor torsional component. The horizontal direction <strong>of</strong> nystagmus was<br />
excitatory in four patients, and inhibitory in three patients. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> latent,<br />
54
Results and comments<br />
spontaneous horizontal nystagmus <strong>of</strong> 33% was signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly higher (p=0.0001) than in<br />
healthy controls. However, the occurrence <strong>of</strong> nystagmus did not correlate with vestibular<br />
symptoms (p=0.30).<br />
Eleven patients (52%) had vestibular symptoms after the operation. Four patients had<br />
rotatory vertigo, two vomited, three had a floating sensation, one had a tilting sensation<br />
and two suffered from unspeci<strong>fi</strong>c dizziness. The vestibular symptoms were mild in seven,<br />
moderate in three, and not graded in one patient. Two <strong>of</strong> these patients stayed overnight in<br />
hospital. During the night following surgery, no medications were needed, and both<br />
patients were discharged from hospital the following day and had uneventful recoveries.<br />
At the time <strong>of</strong> VOG recordings, only one patient had a mild floating sensation; other<br />
patients were free <strong>of</strong> symptoms.<br />
Postoperative audiograms were performed 2-16 months after the operation. The<br />
postoperative AB-GAP was 8 dB (range 0-27 dB), and the mean postoperative PTA for<br />
AC was 30 dB (range 8-70 dB). No signi<strong>fi</strong>cant SNHL greater than 10 dB occurred and the<br />
average overclosure was 6 dB (range -5-25 dB). The audiological results <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />
vestibular symptoms did not differ signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly from those <strong>of</strong> the whole study group<br />
(p=0.85). The mean postoperative AB-GAP was 7 dB (range 0-16 dB) and overclosure<br />
was 8 dB (range 0-25 dB) in patients with vestibular symptoms.<br />
There were signs <strong>of</strong> semicircular canal disturbance presented as a latent, spontaneous<br />
horizontal-torsional nystagmus, but no speci<strong>fi</strong>c nystagmus pattern was detected in patients<br />
with vestibular symptoms after the surgery. In conclusion, the origin <strong>of</strong> vestibular<br />
symptoms appears to be diverse.<br />
55
6 Discussion<br />
Discussion<br />
The <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> has evolved greatly since the <strong>fi</strong>rst successful<br />
fenestration <strong>of</strong> the oval window and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the ossicular chain with an arti<strong>fi</strong>cial<br />
material at 1956 (Shea 1956). During the ensuing decades, less traumatic operative<br />
techniques have been developed to minimize the risk <strong>of</strong> inner ear trauma. Prosthesis<br />
materials that are easier to handle and that have better biocompatibility have been<br />
introduced, the latest having “memory” enabling the surgeon to crimp the prosthesis<br />
without touching it (Harris and Gong 2007, Tange and Grolman 2008). Small-opening<br />
stapedotomy using a laser or micro-drill has become more popular than stapedectomy, in<br />
which the stapes footplate is removed either partially or totally (Raut et al. 2002).<br />
Different sealants made <strong>of</strong> either autologous or arti<strong>fi</strong>cial material have been introduced.<br />
Not every new innovation has been successful. For example, the use <strong>of</strong> gelatin foam as a<br />
sealing material was later found to be related to an increased risk <strong>of</strong> postoperative <strong>fi</strong>stula<br />
(Shea 1988, Hausler 2007). Today, surgery still carries a risk <strong>of</strong> inner ear trauma, which<br />
may lead to SNHL or vestibular dysfunction. This is why continuous research into<br />
<strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong>s is needed. In this thesis, the results <strong>of</strong> simultaneous bilateral surgery,<br />
not previously reported in literature, are introduced and discussed. Two other aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
stapes surgery, the use <strong>of</strong> outpatient surgery and the vestibular effect <strong>of</strong> surgery, neither <strong>of</strong><br />
which has been widely discussed in the literature, were additional areas <strong>of</strong> interest. The<br />
results <strong>of</strong> applicability <strong>of</strong> stapedotomy and stapedectomy as an outpatient surgery are<br />
presented, as is an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the vestibular side-effects <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery.<br />
6.1 Simultaneous bilateral surgery (I)<br />
Simultaneous bilateral <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> has been introduced successfully in other <strong>fi</strong>elds<br />
<strong>of</strong> surgery. Cataract surgery in ophthalmology is a good example because it contains a<br />
similar complication pr<strong>of</strong>ile as otosurgery. In both situations, bilateral loss <strong>of</strong> function<br />
would be catastrophic, except that the loss <strong>of</strong> vision <strong>of</strong>fers fewer opportunities for<br />
rehabilitation. However, simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery has been performed<br />
successfully over the last two decades (Guo et al. 1990, Beatty et al. 1995, Arshin<strong>of</strong>f et al.<br />
2003, Sarikkola et al. 2004). Because the prevalence <strong>of</strong> bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is about 70%,<br />
bilateral surgery in either a single session or two separate sessions is needed to achieve<br />
binaural hearing in many cases (Guild 1944, Hueb et al. 1991). The bene<strong>fi</strong>t <strong>of</strong> binaural<br />
hearing includes better speech discrimination in a noisy environment and the ability to<br />
localize sound. In a report on the quality <strong>of</strong> life after sequential bilateral stapedectomy,<br />
both BHI and IWP were signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly improved after the <strong>fi</strong>rst surgery and after surgery on<br />
the second ear, showing the importance <strong>of</strong> binaural hearing for the individual (De Bruijn<br />
et al. 1998). If surgery could be successfully performed on both ears in a single session,<br />
the total time spent in the hospital, overall medical leave and the need for follow-up visits<br />
would be reduced, providing socioeconomic advantages for both the patient and society.<br />
56
Discussion<br />
The patient also would achieve the advantage <strong>of</strong> binaural hearing without a waiting time<br />
between operations.<br />
Study (I) with simultaneous bilateral surgery for <strong>otosclerosis</strong> was initiated after the careful<br />
exploration <strong>of</strong> the long-term results <strong>of</strong> a large patient population in conventional stapes<br />
surgery. In the past, some authors have discouraged bilateral surgery because <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
SNHL, which can occur years after surgery (Ludman and Grant 1973, Smyth et al. 1975,<br />
Hammond 1976). In a study by Ludman and Grant (1973) there was a high rate <strong>of</strong> dead<br />
ears (3.4%) during the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative year, with another 2.9% occurring later, half <strong>of</strong><br />
these more than six years postoperatively. However, with modern <strong>surgical</strong> methods and<br />
equipment, the risk <strong>of</strong> inner ear trauma seems to have diminished compared with older<br />
studies. In a large series <strong>of</strong> 1800 bilateral partial stapedectomies presented by Daniels et<br />
al. (2001), there were no dead ears, and in another study <strong>of</strong> 3050 stapedotomies by<br />
Vincent et al. (2006) there were only two cases (0.07%) <strong>of</strong> dead ears. Reports on longterm<br />
success and safety have also shown stability <strong>of</strong> these results (House et al. 2002,<br />
Aarnisalo et al. 2003, Vincent et al. 2006). The proportion <strong>of</strong> surgeons willing to operate<br />
on both sides has increased in recent years. However, no consensus exists regarding the<br />
optimal period between the two surgeries (Raut et al. 2002).<br />
With the encouraging results <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery today, this study was undertaken to<br />
evaluate the outcome <strong>of</strong> simultaneous bilateral stapes surgery. All patients were fully<br />
informed about the risks and experimental nature <strong>of</strong> the operative approach. The risk <strong>of</strong><br />
unilateral severe SNHL or vestibular function, based on prevailing literature and our<br />
institutions’ 20-year follow-up results <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery, was estimated to be less than 1%.<br />
This means a bilateral risk <strong>of</strong> less than 0.01% if the ears are considered to be independent<br />
<strong>of</strong> each other. The patients were informed about the actual risk <strong>of</strong> 0.01-1% for a bilateral<br />
complication. Special attention was paid to ensuring that the risk <strong>of</strong> complications<br />
remained as low as possible. Patients included in the study were otherwise healthy and had<br />
not undergone any previous otosurgeries. An experienced surgeon operated on both ears<br />
with general anaesthesia, all dressings and instruments were changed between sides and<br />
intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis was administered during the operation. To avoid<br />
problems due to the prostheses itself, prosthesis from different quality lots or<br />
manufacturers were selected for the right and left ears <strong>of</strong> the patient. If any technical<br />
problems occurred in the <strong>fi</strong>rst ear, any procedures on the second ear were delayed to a<br />
future session. The study was executed in two parts; data from the <strong>fi</strong>rst half <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
group were analysed before we proceeded with the remaining patients.<br />
Hearing results with mean postoperative AB-GAP <strong>of</strong> 7 dB are comparable with the 8 dB<br />
result in our institution’s previous study on unilateral stapes surgery and in the literature in<br />
general (Aarnisalo et al. 2003). The success rate <strong>of</strong> AB-GAP within 10 dB in at least one<br />
ear was 100%, and in 81% <strong>of</strong> the patients this was achieved this bilaterally. Afterwards,<br />
successful revision surgery was performed on the only patient with an unsatisfactory<br />
postoperative AB-GAP <strong>of</strong> over 15 dB. This success rate resembles those <strong>of</strong> larger studies<br />
(Daniels et al. 2001, Vincent et al. 2006).<br />
57
Discussion<br />
Vestibular symptoms after bilateral surgery were found in half <strong>of</strong> the patients, which is<br />
slightly more than that reported in the literature (Birch and Elbrond 1985, Silverstein et al.<br />
1989). This higher prevalence might be due to bilateral surgery, but accurate data<br />
collection with both a formal questionnaire and speci<strong>fi</strong>c oral questions concerning<br />
dizziness probably had an influence on the greater number <strong>of</strong> patients reporting vestibular<br />
symptoms. Actual rotatory vertigo was found in only one patient, and it subsided the same<br />
day that the surgery was performed. The BI in the VFP was followed, and in <strong>fi</strong>ve cases<br />
(28%) there was a minor regression in the results within one week, indicating some<br />
vestibular disturbance caused by the operation. This is in concordance with the patients’<br />
own estimations <strong>of</strong> symptoms being mild or moderate when rated on a <strong>fi</strong>ve-point scale. In<br />
all patients, the BI eventually recovered.<br />
When patients were asked about performance and quality <strong>of</strong> life with regard to their health<br />
after the surgery, they reported signi<strong>fi</strong>cant improvements. This result is analogous with the<br />
<strong>fi</strong>ndings <strong>of</strong> De Bruijn et al. (1998) concerning the effect <strong>of</strong> bilateral stapedectomy on<br />
patients' lives.<br />
In summary, the recovery and hearing results <strong>of</strong> simultaneous bilateral surgery were<br />
similar to those <strong>of</strong> unilateral operations previously reported in the literature. However, the<br />
patients received the advantage <strong>of</strong> bilateral hearing improvement in a single session,<br />
without an extra waiting period and with less time spent in hospital or on sick leave.<br />
Nevertheless, the number <strong>of</strong> patients in this study was quite small and the follow-up time<br />
was only one year. More studies are needed with greater patient numbers and longer<br />
follow-ups to verify the safety <strong>of</strong> the simultaneous approach. The small number <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
in this study also makes it unsuitable for making any reliable estimations <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic<br />
advantages for the patient and/or society. In the future, once the aetiology <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> is revealed, the need for <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> will likely decrease. However, the<br />
advantages <strong>of</strong> the individual should be stressed more when bilateral surgery is considered.<br />
Possible advantages for society should not be the main issue when a new <strong>surgical</strong><br />
approach is planned. These results show that simultaneous bilateral surgery is an<br />
applicable approach in bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. However, at an early stage <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
a new <strong>treatment</strong> protocol, one should remain conservative and advocate it only to<br />
voluntary patients with primary operations and normal anatomical conditions.<br />
6.2 Outpatient surgery (II)<br />
Outpatient surgery has generally become more popular with the last few decades. The<br />
main reason is probably not medical, but an increasing demand for cost-effectiveness,<br />
forcing hospitals to cut expenses. However, if there is no need for postoperative care from<br />
health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals after surgery, the advantage <strong>of</strong> an outpatient setting for the<br />
patient is a more comfortable recovery in familiar surroundings. Nevertheless, not all<br />
58
Discussion<br />
surgeries are suitable for an outpatient protocol, and the safety <strong>of</strong> different <strong>treatment</strong><br />
protocols should be evaluated before they are introduced into common practice.<br />
The traditional standard for stapes surgery has been a hospital setting with 1-2 days <strong>of</strong> bed<br />
rest. Nowadays more and more surgeries are being performed as outpatient procedures.<br />
Although the number <strong>of</strong> studies evaluating the outcome <strong>of</strong> different operative methods <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> is scarce. Dickens and Graham (1989) evaluated differences between inpatient<br />
and outpatient settings in different otological <strong>surgical</strong> procedures, including 507 outpatient<br />
stapes operations and 224 patients that were treated as inpatients. No signi<strong>fi</strong>cant<br />
differences were observed between the groups. The proportion <strong>of</strong> large versus smallfenestra<br />
operations was not reported. Another randomized study from Corvera et al.<br />
(1996), comparing outpatient stapedotomy and an inpatient protocol, found that the<br />
outpatient <strong>treatment</strong> was equally safe and effective. The total patient number was only 20.<br />
To date, no comparisons between outpatient stapedectomies and stapedotomies exist, and,<br />
if Dickens and Graham (1989) is excluded, all available reports <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery consist<br />
<strong>of</strong> only small samples.<br />
In Study II, the hypothesis was that stapedotomy would be more suitable for outpatient<br />
surgery than stapedectomy. The reasoning for this was that there would be a greater need<br />
for the manipulation <strong>of</strong> the footplate in stapedectomy, and thereby, an increased risk <strong>of</strong><br />
temporary irritation <strong>of</strong> the inner ear.<br />
Although all <strong>of</strong> the operations were initially scheduled for an outpatient setting, seven<br />
patients (7%) had to stay in hospital for one night because <strong>of</strong> vestibular symptoms and<br />
nausea. This is a large difference compared with the 0.8% (4/507) <strong>of</strong> unplanned<br />
admissions reported by Dickins and Graham (1989). One explanation might be that 357 <strong>of</strong><br />
their 507 outpatients actually stayed in a motel located in the same building, where they<br />
were transported directly from the recovery room by gurney. There might also be some<br />
cultural differences associated with the patients and health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. The<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> failures was signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly greater in the stapedectomy group than in the<br />
stapedotomy group (13% vs. 2%). This is probably due to the greater mechanical<br />
manipulation <strong>of</strong> the footplate in stapedectomy, with perilymphatic leakage leading to<br />
increased irritation <strong>of</strong> the inner ear. Although not a statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant <strong>fi</strong>nding, a<br />
greater number <strong>of</strong> patients experienced minor SNHL three months after surgery in the<br />
stapedectomy group (11% vs. 4%). This is in accordance with our results <strong>of</strong> vestibular<br />
symptoms presenting a greater risk <strong>of</strong> inner ear irritation in stapedectomy. But it should be<br />
noted that no patient suffered signi<strong>fi</strong>cant SNHL (over 10 dB). The higher number <strong>of</strong><br />
patients admitted was not reflected in the postoperative hearing results. As expected from<br />
previous reports, the hearing results <strong>of</strong> the groups were similar, with a mean postoperative<br />
AB-GAP <strong>of</strong> 8 dB (stapedectomy) and 7 dB (stapedotomy) (House et al. 2002, Aarnisalo et<br />
al. 2003). Although not signi<strong>fi</strong>cant, slightly more patients in the stapedotomy group (83%<br />
vs. 70%) achieved a postoperative AB-GAP <strong>of</strong> less than 10 dB. Overall, the hearing<br />
results were comparable with those in the general literature.<br />
59
Discussion<br />
Both techniques were deemed suitable for outpatient settings. Stapedectomy was related<br />
signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly more <strong>of</strong>ten to outpatient failures due to vestibular symptoms. Generally, the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> outpatient failures should be minimized to avoid the extra costs and stress<br />
associated with unplanned admission. Our <strong>fi</strong>ndings suggest that stapedotomy should be<br />
favoured over stapedectomy if an outpatient setting is scheduled.<br />
6.3 Video-oculography studies (III, IV)<br />
Although vestibular symptoms are the main reason for prolonged hospital stays, little is<br />
known about the mechanism causing postoperative vertigo. Many mechanisms have been<br />
proposed for postoperative vestibular symptoms, including irritation from blood or small<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the footplate entering the vestibulum, the sudden release <strong>of</strong> proteolytic enzymes<br />
from foci at the footplate and pressure changes due to surgery (Causse et al. 1988). The<br />
anatomical closeness <strong>of</strong> otolith organs has led to the suggestion that mechanical irritation<br />
<strong>of</strong> these organs could be one reason for postoperative vestibular symptoms. There are also<br />
membranous connections found between the stapes footplate and the utricle in one-quarter<br />
<strong>of</strong> otherwise normal temporal bones (Backous et al. 1999). These connections and their<br />
breakage during surgery might be responsible for utricular irritation. Wang et al. (2005)<br />
discovered that modifying the tip <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis so that it avoids contact with the<br />
saccule was effective in reducing postoperative vertigo. Overall, the number <strong>of</strong> studies<br />
concentrating on vestibular symptoms is limited, probably because the main interest is in<br />
postoperative hearing results, and vestibular symptoms are usually mild and transient.<br />
Otosclerosis is also associated with an increased incidence <strong>of</strong> vestibular disturbances prior<br />
to surgery (Aantaa and Virolainen 1978, Birch and Elbrond 1985). The aetiology and the<br />
end organ causing the preoperative vestibular symptoms have not been unveiled.<br />
VOG is modern way <strong>of</strong> measuring eye movements, <strong>of</strong>fering some advantages compared<br />
with electronystagmography (ENG). With VOG, the problems related to electrodes are<br />
fully avoided, and it allows exploration <strong>of</strong> all three components <strong>of</strong> nystagmus (Bisdorff et<br />
al. 2000, Geisler et al. 2000). ENG provides only horizontal and vertical components, but<br />
with VOG the rotatory component can also be evaluated. However, for VOG, the patients’<br />
eyes must be constantly open, enabling the s<strong>of</strong>tware to track eye movements from the<br />
video recording. This makes it prone to artefacts caused by blinking, drooping eyelids or<br />
eye lashes. The graphic presentation <strong>of</strong> the eye movements can, however, be veri<strong>fi</strong>ed<br />
manually using the recorded video format.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> Studies III and IV was to determinate reasons for vestibular symptoms after<br />
stapes surgery. Previous studies has mostly evaluated horizontal nystagmus with ENG, but<br />
no studies concentrating on the VOG <strong>fi</strong>ndings <strong>of</strong> otosclerotic patients have been presented.<br />
This is why we chose VOG as a method <strong>of</strong> measurement in these studies. The <strong>fi</strong>rst study<br />
(III) included measurements preoperatively and at one week to 3-4 months<br />
postoperatively. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> vestibular symptoms after surgery was 27%, which is<br />
in concordance with previous reports (Birch and Elbrond 1985, Koizuka et al. 1995).<br />
60
Discussion<br />
Patients with vestibular symptoms did not present a signi<strong>fi</strong>cant correlation between<br />
vestibular symptoms and type <strong>of</strong> nystagmus. Preoperatively, spontaneous horizontal<br />
nystagmus was found in 18% and postoperatively in 11-19% <strong>of</strong> patients. These results are<br />
similar to previous reports (Aantaa and Virolainen 1978, Birch and Elbrond 1985). None<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients had HSN preoperatively. The postoperative prevalence <strong>of</strong> HSN (11-15%)<br />
was not signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly different, and there was no correlation with symptoms. A tendency<br />
was found for vestibular symptoms to be more prevalent after the second ear operation and<br />
also to be more frequent in stapedectomy than in stapedotomy, but neither difference was<br />
statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant. As had been previously reported in the literature, vestibular<br />
symptoms were mild and short-lasting. Only one patient (3%) had vestibular symptoms<br />
one month postoperatively.<br />
Because Study III was not successful in showing the speci<strong>fi</strong>c end organ affected, we<br />
decided to attain VOG measurements immediately after the surgery. Again, no correlation<br />
was present between type <strong>of</strong> nystagmus and vestibular symptoms in Study IV. There were<br />
three cases with pathological nystagmus, all without vestibular symptoms. However, we<br />
were able to <strong>fi</strong>nd seven cases <strong>of</strong> latent, spontaneous horizontal nystagmus prevailing only<br />
during lateral gaze in the direction <strong>of</strong> the fast phase, with a gaze angle <strong>of</strong> less than 30 º. In<br />
one patient, this was related to the vertical component, and in all other cases a minor<br />
torsional component was visible. This prevalence <strong>of</strong> latent, spontaneous horizontal<br />
nystagmus <strong>of</strong> 33% was signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly higher (p= 0.0001) than in healthy controls. This type<br />
<strong>of</strong> nystagmus displays a weak, peripheral asymmetry between the ears, arising from the<br />
semicircular canals according to Alexander's law (Robinson et al. 1984). The type <strong>of</strong><br />
horizontal-torsional nystagmus suggests involvement <strong>of</strong> all semicircular canals analogous<br />
to that seen after acute unilateral vestibular loss (Fetter and Dichgans 1996). Both<br />
excitatory and inhibitory types <strong>of</strong> nystagmus were represented in our study. We could<br />
identify the torsional component through visual inspection, but as the VOG did not<br />
quantify the torsional component, its SPV could not be calculated. Patients received<br />
diazepam preoperatively and short-acting opioids during surgery. Opioids have been<br />
shown to induce downbeating nystagmus and to suppress the vestibulo-ocular reflex<br />
(Padoan et al. 1990, Rottach et al. 2002). Sedatives may also cause symmetric gazeevoked<br />
nystagmus (Baloh and Honrubia 2001). Downbeating nystagmus was not<br />
encountered in our study, but one patient had symmetric gaze-evoked nystagmus. Taken<br />
together, opioids may have had a minor suppressive effect on SPV <strong>of</strong> nystagmus and on<br />
clinical vestibular symptoms in this study. To avoid this confounder in future, only shortacting<br />
sedatives should be used if measurements are performed on the same day as the<br />
operation.<br />
In Study IV, eleven patients (52%) had vestibular symptoms, which is more than generally<br />
reported in the literature (Aantaa and Virolainen 1978, Birch and Elbrond 1985). The<br />
reason may simply be the strict protocol inquiring about even the mildest <strong>of</strong> symptoms.<br />
Only four patients (19%) had mild rotatory vertigo, which was temporary, and all <strong>of</strong> these<br />
patients were treated as outpatients. Three patients had a floating and one patient a tilting<br />
sensation, which imply symptoms <strong>of</strong> otolith origin. Two patients spend their <strong>fi</strong>rst<br />
61
Discussion<br />
postoperative night in hospital. They did not need medications during the night following<br />
surgery and were discharged on the <strong>fi</strong>rst postoperative day in good health. The vestibular<br />
symptoms experienced were unrelated to abnormal nystagmus <strong>fi</strong>ndings, which might be<br />
due to the subjective sensations mostly occurring immediately after the operation, and our<br />
recordings being performed later, on average four hours postoperatively, when all but one<br />
patient was free <strong>of</strong> symptoms.<br />
Audiological results were comparable with those in the literature with postoperative AB-<br />
GAPs <strong>of</strong> 6 dB (III) and 8 dB (IV). No signi<strong>fi</strong>cant SNHL occurred in either study. Similar<br />
to a study by Aantaa and Virolainen (1978), no association existed between hearing results<br />
and vestibular symptoms.<br />
The eye movements in Studies III and IV were thoroughly evaluated at multiple timepoints,<br />
but no association with type <strong>of</strong> nystagmus or vestibular symptoms was found. This<br />
suggests that vestibular symptoms have a diverse origin. Appearance <strong>of</strong> vestibular<br />
symptoms with rotatory and also with floating and tilting sensations immediately after<br />
surgery are in concordance with this suggestion. In measurements immediately after<br />
surgery, we saw signs <strong>of</strong> disturbance <strong>of</strong> the semicircular canals. However, mechanical or<br />
other stimulation <strong>of</strong> the otolith organ might be another cause <strong>of</strong> dizziness, as suggested by<br />
the symptoms <strong>of</strong> floating and tilting in some <strong>of</strong> our patients, although we observed no<br />
signs <strong>of</strong> obvious eye deviation or counter-rolling on the videotapes. Postoperatively,<br />
increased resting activities <strong>of</strong> utricular afferents without semicircular canal irritation have<br />
been suggested. This was explored by evaluating the results <strong>of</strong> subjective visual horizontal<br />
and VOG measurements after stapedotomy (Tribukait and Bergenius 1998). Those authors<br />
found no correlation between vestibular symptoms and objective measurements. This<br />
could be due to late measurements, a few days after surgery, similarly to our results. In a<br />
study by Wang et al. (2005), saccular irritation caused by the prosthesis was suggested as<br />
a reason for vestibular symptoms. In that study, an anatomically modi<strong>fi</strong>ed tip <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prosthesis to avoid contact with the saccule was found effective in preventing<br />
postoperative vestibular symptoms. This is, however, not in concordance with other<br />
studies concerning changes in saccular function after stapes surgery. VEMPs arising from<br />
the saccule are not decreased after the surgery, indicating that the function <strong>of</strong> the saccule<br />
has been maintained (Singbartl et al. 2006, Stapleton et al. 2008). In our study, VOG was<br />
found to be an effective method for evaluating vestibular organ irritation. In the future, to<br />
unveil the pathological process leading to postoperative vertigo, the gap between opening<br />
the oval window and objective measurements should be as short as possible and<br />
measurements for otolith organs should be included.<br />
62
7 Conclusions<br />
Conclusions<br />
Audiological results and recovery were comparable between simultaneous bilateral<br />
surgery and conventional unilateral surgery. Simultaneous bilateral surgery is thus suitable<br />
for treating bilateral <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. However, because this <strong>treatment</strong> is in its early stages <strong>of</strong><br />
introduction, one should remain conservative and advocate this option only to voluntary<br />
patients with primary operations and normal anatomical conditions.<br />
Although no statistically signi<strong>fi</strong>cant differences in audiological results were present<br />
between the two treatmens, stapedotomy was found to be signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly less vulnerable to<br />
outpatient failures. If an outpatient setting is scheduled, stapedotomy should be preferred.<br />
However, in experienced hands, both methods are applicable and <strong>of</strong>fer similar hearing<br />
results.<br />
Clinically, patients experienced mild to moderate vestibular symptoms likely due to<br />
irritation <strong>of</strong> the otolith organ and semicircular canals. Minor irritation <strong>of</strong> the semicircular<br />
canals could be detected after the surgery, but this was not connected to vestibular<br />
symptoms, which have probably a diverse origin. Since vestibular symptoms and signs are<br />
mild, patients may be safely discharged some hours after stapes surgery.<br />
63
8 Acknowledgements<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This study was carried out in 2003-2009 at the Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology,<br />
<strong>Helsinki</strong> University Central Hospital, and at the Department <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology,<br />
Seinäjoki Central Hospital. Pr<strong>of</strong>essors Anne Pitkäranta, Pekka Karma and Jukka Ylikoski,<br />
Docent Hans Ramsay from <strong>Helsinki</strong> University Central Hospital and Doctor Panu<br />
Kuoppala from Seinäjoki Central Hospital are thanked for providing me with the<br />
opportunity and facilities to carry out this work.<br />
My deepest gratitude is owed to my supervisor Docent Timo Hirvonen. His vast<br />
experience in clinical and scienti<strong>fi</strong>c work could always be relied on when guidance (very<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten) was needed. He also demonstrated admirable patience and understanding when my<br />
attention was directed more to other aspects <strong>of</strong> life. His encouragement was instrumental<br />
to my <strong>fi</strong>nishing this thesis.<br />
I am very grateful to Heikki Aalto, PhD, Docent Juha-Pekka Vasama and Docent Hans<br />
Ramsay, who were my co-authors in the original publications. Heikki’s contribution to the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> equipments for vestibular organ measurements and to the actual<br />
measurements was irreplaceable. His precise and pedantic attitude toward science and<br />
everyday work is admirable. Juha-Pekka and Hans were also responsible for the <strong>surgical</strong><br />
interventions in this project together with Timo Hirvonen.<br />
I am grateful to the reviewers <strong>of</strong> this thesis, Docent Kyösti Laitakari and Docent Jukka<br />
Pulkkinen, for their constructive criticism and the comments that greatly improved the<br />
<strong>fi</strong>nal product. The language content was reviewed by Carol Ann Pelli <strong>of</strong> <strong>Helsinki</strong><br />
University Language Services.<br />
I have warm memories <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> my colleagues during my residency. I especially want to<br />
thank Tuomas, Samuli, Katriina and Lauri. Tuomas, Samuli and Katriina are thanked for<br />
the good times in Kotka, where we headed after residency. During the long drives to work,<br />
all areas <strong>of</strong> life were covered in conversations, and we became close friends. Lauri is<br />
another friend I can rely on. His recent experience making a thesis and great advice made<br />
my work much easier.<br />
I am indebted to Erkki Hopsu for the many conversations that taught me to defend my<br />
position and for showing me that one can found new perspectives in almost any issue. It<br />
was privilege to start as a young specialist under his guidance. He gave me the opportunity<br />
to try my wings, but when help was needed, I could always rely on him or Juha Tasa.<br />
Thank you both.<br />
My colleagues and co-workers in Seinäjoki Central Hospital are warmly thanked for<br />
sharing the excitement <strong>of</strong> <strong>fi</strong>nishing this thesis. I especially want to thank Pauli Ritvanen at<br />
the Health library.<br />
64
Acknowledgements<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> my writing in English is not understandable; however, after Carlys’ spell check <strong>of</strong><br />
the original publications and the thesis, I could present my work without shame. I can’t<br />
<strong>fi</strong>nd words to express my gratitude so please accept the Finnish chocolate I’ve sent to you<br />
in Canada as a token <strong>of</strong> my appreciation.<br />
My heartfelt thanks go to my family: Sari, Emilia and Johannes. Children make life a bit<br />
harder, but so much sweeter. Emilia and Johannes have shown me what is truly important<br />
in life. And my dear wife Sari has selflessly and skilfully taken care <strong>of</strong> our home when my<br />
work has kept me away. I love you.<br />
This study was <strong>fi</strong>nancially supported by the Instrumentarium Science Foundation, the<br />
Otologic Research Foundation and the Finnish Medical Foundation. Special government<br />
subsidies for health sciences research were awarded by <strong>Helsinki</strong> University Central<br />
Hospital, Tampere University Central Hospital, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital and<br />
Seinäjoki Central Hospital.<br />
Seinäjoki, April 2009<br />
Juuso Kujala<br />
65
9 References<br />
References<br />
Aantaa E, Virolainen E. The pre- and postoperative ENG <strong>fi</strong>ndings in clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
and the late hearing results. Acta Otolaryngol 85: 313-7, 1978.<br />
Aarnisalo AA, Vasama J-P, Hopsu E, Ramsay H. Long-term hearing results after stapes<br />
surgery. A 20-year follow-up. Otol Neurotol 24: 567-71, 2003.<br />
Abd el-Rahman AG. Cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> relationship <strong>of</strong> spiral<br />
ligament hyalinization to hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol 104: 952-5, 1990.<br />
Althaus SR, House HP. Long term results <strong>of</strong> perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stula repair. Laryngoscope 83:<br />
1502-9, 1973.<br />
Altmann F, Glasgold A, Macduff JP. The incidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> as related to race and<br />
sex. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 76: 377-92, 1967.<br />
Arnold W, Busch R, Arnold A, Ritsher B, Neiss A, Niedermeyer HP. The influence <strong>of</strong><br />
measles vaccination on the incidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in Germany. Eur Arch<br />
Otorhinolaryngol 264: 741-8, 2007.<br />
Arnold W, Friedmann I. Detection <strong>of</strong> measles and rubella-speci<strong>fi</strong>c antigens in the<br />
endochondral ossi<strong>fi</strong>cation zone in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) 66: 167-<br />
71, 1987.<br />
Arshin<strong>of</strong>f SA, Strube YN, Yagev R. Simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery. J Cataract<br />
Refract Surg 29: 1281-91, 2003.<br />
Ayache D, Earally F, Elbaz P. Characteristic and postoperative course <strong>of</strong> tinnitus in<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otol Neurotol 24: 48-51, 2003.<br />
Ayache D, Lejeune D, Williams MT. Imaging <strong>of</strong> postoperative sensorineural<br />
complications <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65: 308-13, 2007.<br />
Backous DD, Minor LB, Aboujaoude ES, Nager GT. Relationship <strong>of</strong> the utriculus and<br />
sacculus to the stapes footplate: anatomic implications for sound-and/or pressureinduced<br />
otolith activation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108: 548-53, 1999.<br />
Badran K, Gosh S, Farag A, Timms MS. How we do it: Switching from mechanical<br />
perforation to the CO2 laser; audit results <strong>of</strong> primary small-fenestra stapedotomy in a<br />
district general hospital. Clin Otolaryngol 31: 546-9, 2006.<br />
Bailey HA Jr, Pappas JJ, Graham SS. Small fenestra stapedectomy technique: reducing<br />
risk and improving hearing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 91: 516-20, 1983.<br />
Balle V, Linthicum FH. Histologically proven cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong> with pure<br />
sensoryneural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93: 105-11, 1984.<br />
66
References<br />
Baloh RW, Honrubia. Clinical neurophysiology <strong>of</strong> the vestibular system third edition.<br />
Oxford University Press, 2001: 132-51.<br />
Batman C, Oztürk O, Ramadan SS. Postoperative granuloma after stapedectomy: is it<br />
destiny or avoidable? Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65: 285-95, 2007.<br />
Beatty S, Aggarwal RK, David DB, Guarro M, Jones H, Pearce JL. Simultaneous bilateral<br />
cataract extraction in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol 79: 1111-4, 1995.<br />
Belden CJ, Weg N, Minor LB, Zinreich SJ. CT evaluation <strong>of</strong> bone dehiscence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
superior semicircular canal as a cause <strong>of</strong> sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo.<br />
Radiology 226: 337-43, 2003.<br />
Birch L, Elbrond O. Stapedectomy and vertigo. Clin Otolaryngol 10: 217-23, 1985.<br />
Birch L, Elbrond O, Pedersen U. Hearing improvement after stapedectomy: up to 19 years'<br />
follow-up period. J Laryngol Otol 100: 1-7, 1986.<br />
Bisdorff AR, Sancovic S, Debatisse D, Bentley C, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM. Posiotional<br />
nystagmus in the dark in normal subjects. Neuro-ophthalmology 24: 283-90, 2000.<br />
Bretlau P, Causse J, Causse JB, Hansen HJ, Johnsen NJ, Salomon G. Otospongiosis and<br />
sodium fluoride. A blind experimental and clinical evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> sodium<br />
fluoride <strong>treatment</strong> in patients with otospongiosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 94: 103-7,<br />
1985.<br />
Bretlau P, Hansen HJ, Causse J, Causse JB. Otospongiosis: morphologic and<br />
microchemical investigation after NaF-<strong>treatment</strong>. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 89:<br />
646-50, 1981.<br />
Brookler KH, Tanyeri H. Etidronate for the the neurotologic symptoms <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>:<br />
preliminary study. Ear Nose Throat J 76: 371-6, 379-81, 1997.<br />
Browning GG, Gatehouse S, Swan IRC. The Glasgow bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot: a new method for<br />
reporting bene<strong>fi</strong>ts from middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope 101: 180-5, 1991.<br />
Bujía J, Alsalameh S, Jerez R, Sittinger M, Wilmes E, Burmester G. Antibodies to the<br />
minor cartilage collagen type IX in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Am J Otol 15: 222-4, 1994.<br />
Calmels MN, Viana C, Wanna G, Marx M, James C, Deguine O, Fraysse B. Very faradvanced<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>: stapedotomy or cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 127:<br />
574-8, 2007.<br />
Causse JB. Etiology and therapy <strong>of</strong> cochlear drops following stapedectomy. Am J Otol 1:<br />
221-4, 1980.<br />
67
References<br />
Causse J, Causse JB. Eighteen-year report <strong>of</strong> on stapedectomy. I: problems <strong>of</strong> stapedial<br />
<strong>fi</strong>xation. Clin Otolaryngol 5: 49-59, 1980a.<br />
Causse J, Causse JB. Eighteen-year report on stapedectomy. III. Postoperative<br />
complications. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 5: 397-402, 1980b.<br />
Causse JB, Causse JR, Cezard R, Briand C, Bretlau P, Wiet R, House JW. Vertigo in<br />
postoperative follow-up <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Am J Otol 9: 246-55, 1988.<br />
Causse JB, Causse JR, Wiet RJ, Yoo TJ. Complications <strong>of</strong> stapedectomies. Am J Otol 4:<br />
275-80, 1983.<br />
Causse JR, Causse JB, Bretlau P, Uriel J, Berges J, Chevance LG, Shambaugh GE,<br />
Bastide JM. Etiology <strong>of</strong> otospongiotic sensoryneural loss. Am J Otol 10: 99-107, 1989.<br />
Causse JR, Causse JB, Uriel J, Berges J, Shambaugh GE Jr, Bretlau P. Sodium fluoride<br />
therapy. Am J Otol 14: 482-90, 1993a.<br />
Causse JR, Chevance LG. Sensoryneural hearing loss due to cochlear otospongiosis<br />
aetiology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 11: 125-34, 1978.<br />
Causse JB, Gherini S, Horn KL. Surgical <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> stapes <strong>fi</strong>xation by <strong>fi</strong>beroptic argon<br />
laser stapedotomy with reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the annular ligament. Otolaryngol Clin North<br />
Am 26: 395-416, 1993b.<br />
Causse JB, Vincent R. Poor vibration <strong>of</strong> inner ear fluids as a cause <strong>of</strong> low tone tinnitus.<br />
Am J Otol 5: 701-2, 1995.<br />
Causse J, Vincent R, Michat M, Gherini S. Stapedius tendon reconstruction during<br />
stapedotomy: tehnique and results. Ear Nose Throat J 76: 256-9, 1997.<br />
Chevance L, Bretlau P, Jorgensen M, Causse J. Otosclerosis: an electron microscopic and<br />
cytochemical study. Acta Otolaryngol 272: 1-44, 1970.<br />
Chole RA, McKenna M. Pathophysiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otol Neurotol 22: 249-57, 2001.<br />
Colletti V, Fiorino FG. Stapedotomy with stapedius tendon preservation:technique and<br />
long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111: 181-8, 1994.<br />
Cody DTR, Baker HL. Otosclerosis: vestibular symptoms and sensorineural hearing loss.<br />
Ann Otol 87: 778-96, 1978.<br />
Corvera G, Cespedes B, Ysunza A, Arrieta J. Ambulatory vs. in-patient stapedectomy: A<br />
randomized twenty-patient pilot study. Head Neck Surg 114: 355-9, 1996.<br />
Cremers CW, Beusen JM, Huygen PL. Hearing gain after stapedotomy, partial<br />
platinectomy, or total stapedectomy for <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100:<br />
959-61, 1991.<br />
68
References<br />
Dahlqvist A, Diamant H, Dahlqvist SR, Cedergren B. HLA antigens in patients with<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Acta Otolaryngol 100: 33-5, 1985.<br />
Daniels RL, Krieger LW, Lippy WH. The other ear: <strong>fi</strong>ndings and results in 1800 bilateral<br />
stapedectomies. Otol Neurotol 22: 603-7, 2001.<br />
De Bruijn AJC, Tange RA, Dreschler WA. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> second-ear stapedotomy with the<br />
Glasgow bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot. ORL 61: 92-7, 1999.<br />
De Bruijn AJC, Tange RA, Dreschler WA, Grolman W, Shouwenburg PF. Bilateral<br />
stapedotomy in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: a disability-oriented evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bene<strong>fi</strong>t <strong>of</strong> second ear surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 23: 123-7, 1998.<br />
Declau F, van Spaendonck M, Timermans JP, Michaels L, Liang J, Qiu JP, van de<br />
Heyning P. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in an unselected series <strong>of</strong> temporal bones. Otol<br />
Neurotol 22: 596-602, 2001.<br />
De La Cruz A, Fayad JN. Revision stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123: 728-<br />
32, 2000.<br />
Del Bo M, Zaghis A, Ambrosetti U. Some observations concerning 200 stapedectomies:<br />
<strong>fi</strong>fteen eyars postoperatively. Laryngoscope 97: 1211-3, 1987.<br />
Derks W, De Groot JA, Raymakers JA, Veldman JE. Fluoride therapy for cochlear<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>? An audiometric and computerized tomography evaluation. Acta<br />
Otolaryngol 121: 174-7, 2001.<br />
Dickins JRE, Graham SS. Otologic surgery in the outpatient versus the hospital setting.<br />
Am J Otol 10: 252-5, 1989.<br />
Doherty JK, Linthicum FH Jr. Spiral ligament and stria vascularis changes in cochlear<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>: effect on hearing level. Otol Neurotol 25: 457-64, 2004.<br />
Ealy M, Chen W, Ryu GY, Yoon JG, Welling DB, Hansen M, Madan A, Smith RJ. Gene<br />
expression analysis <strong>of</strong> human otosclerotic stapedial footplates. Hear Res 240: 80-6,<br />
2008.<br />
Elonka DR, Applebaum EL. Otosclerotic involvement <strong>of</strong> the cochlea: a histologic and<br />
audiologic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 89: 343-51, 1981.<br />
Esquivel CR, Mamikoglu B, Wiet RJ. Long-term results <strong>of</strong> small fenestra stapedectomy<br />
compared with large fenestra technique. Laryngoscope 112: 1338-41, 2002.<br />
Falcone MT, Gajewski BJ, Antonelli PJ. Hearing loss with stapedotomy in otitis media.<br />
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129: 666-73, 2003.<br />
69
References<br />
Faye-Lund H, Stanngeland N, Rohrt T. Long-term results <strong>of</strong> bilateral stapedectomy. J<br />
Laryngol Otol 98: 247-54, 1984.<br />
Feldman AS. An investigation <strong>of</strong> secondary nerve degeneration in clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Arch Otolaryngol 72: 425-30, 1960.<br />
Fenton JE, Turner J, Shirazi A, Fagan PA. Post-stapedectomy reparative granuloma: a<br />
misnomer. J Laryngol Otol 110: 185-8, 1996.<br />
Fetter M, Dichgans J. Vestibular neuritis spares the inferior division <strong>of</strong> the vestibular<br />
nerve. Brain 119: 755-63 1996.<br />
Fish U. Vestibular symptoms before and after stapedectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 60: 513-<br />
30, 1965.<br />
Fisch U. Stapedectomy versus stapedectomy. Am J Otol 4: 112-7, 1982.<br />
Fowler EP. Anterior crurotomy and mobilization <strong>of</strong> the ankylosed stapes foot-plate;<br />
introduction to a motion picture demonstration. Acta Otolaryngol 46: 319-22, 1956.<br />
Fowler EP. Otosclerosis in identical twins. A study <strong>of</strong> 40 pairs. Arch Otolaryngol 83: 324-<br />
8, 1966.<br />
Franklin DJ, Pollack A, Fisch U. Meniere’s symptoms resulting from bilateral otosclerotic<br />
occlusion <strong>of</strong> the endolymphatic duct: an analysis <strong>of</strong> a causal relationship between<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> and menieres disease. Am J Otol 11: 135-40, 1990.<br />
Frenz M. Physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> various lasers used in stapes surgery. Adv<br />
Otorhinolaryngol 65: 237-49, 2007.<br />
Gacek RR. The diagnosis and <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> poststapedectomy granuloma. Ann Otol Rhinol<br />
Laryngol 79: 970-5, 1970.<br />
Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Rubinstein JT, Wolawer A, Lowder M, Abbas P, Brown C, Hughes<br />
M, Preece JP. Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol<br />
Neurotol 23: 169-80, 2002.<br />
Gapany-Gapanavicius B. The incidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in the general population. Isr J<br />
Med Sci 11: 465-8, 1975.<br />
Goh JP, Chan LL, Tan TY. MRI <strong>of</strong> cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Br J Radiol 75: 502-5, 2002.<br />
Govaerts PJ, Raemaekers J, Verlinden A, Kalai M, Somers T, Offeciers FE. Use <strong>of</strong><br />
antibiotic prophylaxis in ear surgery. Laryngoscope 108: 107-10, 1998.<br />
Geisler C, Bergenius J and Brantberg K. Nystagmus <strong>fi</strong>ndings in healthy subjects<br />
examined with infrared videonystagmoscopy. ORL 62: 266-9, 2000.<br />
70
References<br />
Gersdorff M, Nouwen J, Gilain C, Decat M, Betsch C. Tinnitus and otsclerosis. Eur Arch<br />
Otorhinolaryngol 257: 314-6, 2000.<br />
Glasscock ME, Storper IS, Haynes DS, Bohrer PS. Stapedectomy in pr<strong>of</strong>ound cochlear<br />
loss. Laryngoscope 106: 831-3, 1996.<br />
Grayeli AB, Sterkers O, Roulleau P, Elbaz P, Ferrary E, Silve C. Parathyroid hormoneparathyroid<br />
hormone-related peptide receptor expression and function in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Am J Physiol 277: 1005- 12, 1999.<br />
Gristwood RE, Venables WN. Pregnancy and <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 8:<br />
205-10, 1983.<br />
Gristwood RE, Venables WN. Otosclerosis and chronic tinnitus. Ann Otol Rhinol<br />
Laryngol 112: 398-403, 2003.<br />
Grolman W, Tange RA, de Bruijn AJ, Hart AA, Schouwenburg PF. A retrospective study<br />
<strong>of</strong> the hearing results obtained after stapedotomy by the implantation <strong>of</strong> two Teflon<br />
pistons with a different diameter. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254: 422-4, 1997.<br />
Gros A, Zargi M, Vatovec J. Does it make sense to preserve the stapesial muscle during<br />
<strong>surgical</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> for <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. J Laryngol Otol 114: 930-4, 2000.<br />
Guil SR. Histologic Otosclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 53: 246-267, 1944.<br />
Guo S, Nelson LB, Calhoun J, Levin A. Simultaneous surgery for bilateral congenital<br />
cataracts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 27: 23-5; discussion 26-7, 1990.<br />
Hall JG. Otosclerosis in Norway, a geographical and genetical study. Acta Otolaryngol<br />
Suppl 324: 1-20, 1974.<br />
Hammond V. The indications for stapedectomy. J Laryngol Otol 90: 23-9, 1976.<br />
Hannley MT. Audiological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Otolaryngologic Clinics <strong>of</strong> North America 26: 373-87, 1993.<br />
Harris JP, Gong S. Comparison <strong>of</strong> hearing results <strong>of</strong> nitinol SMART stapes piston<br />
prosthesis with conventional piston prostheses: postoperative results <strong>of</strong> nitinol stapes<br />
prosthesis. Otol Neurotol 28: 692-5, 2007.<br />
Hausler R. General history <strong>of</strong> stapedectomy. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65: 1-5, 2007.<br />
Hinojosa R, Marion M. Otosclerosis and sensuryneural hearing loss: a histopathologic<br />
study. Am J Otolaryngol 8: 296-307, 1987.<br />
Hirvonen TP, Hirvonen M, Aalto H. Postural control measured by visual feedback<br />
posturography. ORL 3: 186-90, 2002.<br />
71
References<br />
Hough JV, Dyer RK Jr. Stapedectomy. Causes <strong>of</strong> failure and revision surgery in<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 26: 453-70, 1993.<br />
House JW, Cunniningham CD. Cummings Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery 4th<br />
edition. Edited by Cummings CW et al. Mosby Inc., Philadelphia 2005: 3562-73.<br />
House HP, Hansen MR, Al Dakhail AAA, House JW. Stapedectomy versus stapedotomy:<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> results with long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 112: 2046-50, 2002.<br />
House WF, Sheehy JL. Stapes surgery: selection <strong>of</strong> the patient. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol<br />
70: 1062-8, 1961.<br />
Huber AM, Ma F, Felix H, Linder T. Stapes prosthesis attachment: the effect <strong>of</strong> crimping<br />
on sound transfer in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> surgery. Laryngoscope 113: 853-8, 2003.<br />
Huber A, Linder T, Fisch U. Is the Er:YAG laser damaging to inner ear function. Otol<br />
Neurotol 22: 311-5, 2001a.<br />
Huber AM, Schwab C, Linder T, Stoeckli SJ, Ferrazzini M, Dillier N, Fisch U. Evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> eardrum laser Doppler interferometry as a diagnostic tool. Laryngoscope 111: 501-<br />
7, 2001b.<br />
Hueb MM, Goycoolea MV, Paparella MM, Oliveira JA. Otosclerosis: The University <strong>of</strong><br />
Minnesota temporal bone collection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 105: 396-405,<br />
1991.<br />
Huovinen P, Vaara M. Mikrobiologia ja infektiosairaudet. Kustannus Oy Duodecim,<br />
<strong>Helsinki</strong> 2005; (2): 81-109.<br />
Huotari K, Lyytikäinen O, Seitsalo S. Patient outcomes after simultaneous bilateral total<br />
hip and knee joint replacements. J Hosp Infect 65: 219-25, 2007.<br />
Huttenbrink KB. Biomechanics on stapedoplasty: a reviev. Otol Neurotol 24: 548-59,<br />
2003.<br />
Häusler R. Schär PJ, Pratisto H, Weber HP, Frenz M. Advantages and dangers <strong>of</strong> erbium<br />
laser application in stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 119: 207-13, 1999.<br />
Imauchi Y, Lombès M, Lainé P, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Grayeli AB. Glucocorticoids<br />
inhibit diastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter activity in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> by interleukin-6.<br />
Laryngoscope 116: 1647-50, 2006.<br />
Imauchi Y, Jeunemaître X, Boussion M, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Grayeli AB. Relation<br />
between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: a genetic association<br />
and in vitro study. Otol Neurotol 29: 295-301, 2008.<br />
72
References<br />
Jablokow VR, Kathuria S. Fatal meningitis due to Serratia marcescens after stapedectomy.<br />
Arch Otolaryngol 108: 34-5, 1982.<br />
Jastreb<strong>of</strong>f PJ. Phantom auditory perception (Tinnitus): mechanisms <strong>of</strong> generation and<br />
perception. Neurosci Res 8: 221-254, 1990.<br />
Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 92: 311, 1970.<br />
Johnson EW. Hearing aids and <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 26: 491-502,<br />
1993.<br />
Johnsson LG, Pyykkö I, Pollak A, Gleeson M, Felix H. Cochlear vascular pathology and<br />
hydrops in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Acta Otolaryngol 115: 255-9, 1995.<br />
Karhuketo TS, Lundmark J, Vanhatalo J, Rautiainen M, Sipilä M. Stapes surgery: A 32year<br />
follow-up. ORL 69: 322-6, 2007.<br />
Karosi T, Jókay I, Kónya J, Petkó M, Szabó LZ, Sziklai I. Expression <strong>of</strong> measles virus<br />
receptors in otosclerotic, non-otosclerotic and in normal stapes footplates. Eur Arch<br />
Otorhinolaryngol 264: 607-13, 2007.<br />
Kaufman RS, Schuknecht HF. Reparative granuloma following stapedectomy: a clinical<br />
entity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 76: 1008-17, 1967.<br />
Kennedy DW, H<strong>of</strong>fer ME, Holliday M. The effects <strong>of</strong> etidronate disodium on progressive<br />
hearing loss from <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 109: 461-7, 1993.<br />
Khalifa A, el-Guindy A, Erfan F. Stapedectomy for far-advanced <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. J Laryngol<br />
Otol 112: 158-60, 1998.<br />
Klemens JJ, Mhoon E, Redleaf M. Is simultaneous bilateral mastoidectomy ever<br />
advisable? J Laryngol Otol 121: 1041-7, 2007.<br />
Klockars T, Kentala E. Case report: Meniere’s disease and <strong>otosclerosis</strong> – different<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> the same disease? Auris Nasus Larynx 34: 101-4, 2007.<br />
Kos MI, Montandon PB, Guyot JP. Short- and long-term results <strong>of</strong> stapedotomy and<br />
stapedectomy with a Teflon-wire piston prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:<br />
907-11, 2001.<br />
Koizuka I, Sakagami M, Doi K, Takeda N, Matsunaga T. Nystagmus measured by ENG<br />
after stapes surgery. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520: 258-9, 1995.<br />
Kougias P, Kappa JR, Sewell DH, Feit RA, Michalik RE, Imam M, Green<strong>fi</strong>eld TD.<br />
Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting: results in<br />
speci<strong>fi</strong>c patient groups. Ann Vasc Surg 21: 408-14, 2007.<br />
73
References<br />
Laitakari K, Löppönen H, Luotonen J. Huonokuuloisuuden kiireetön leikkaushoito.<br />
Yhtenäiset kiireettömän hoidon perusteet. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön oppaita<br />
2005(5): 163.<br />
Lesinski GS. Causes <strong>of</strong> conductive hearing loss after stapedectomy or stapedotomy: a<br />
prospective study <strong>of</strong> 279 consecutive <strong>surgical</strong> revision. Otol Neurotol 23: 281-8, 2002.<br />
Lesinski GS, Newrock R. Carbon dioxide lasers for <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otolaryngol Clin North<br />
Am 26: 417-41, 1993.<br />
Levo H, Aalto H, Hirvonen TP. Nystagmus measured with video-oculography:<br />
methodological aspects and normative data. ORL 3: 101-4, 2001.<br />
Lippy WH, Battista RA, Berenholz L, Schuring AG, Burkey JM. Twenty-year review <strong>of</strong><br />
revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 24: 560-6, 2003.<br />
Lippy WH, Berenholz LP, Schuring AG, Burkey JM. Does pregnancy affect <strong>otosclerosis</strong>?<br />
Laryngoscope 115: 1833-6, 2005.<br />
Linthicum FH. Histopathology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otolaryngologic Clinics <strong>of</strong> North America<br />
26: 335-52, 1993.<br />
Linthicum FH Jr. Histological evidence <strong>of</strong> the causes <strong>of</strong> failure in stapes surgery. Ann<br />
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 80: 67-77, 1971.<br />
Lolov SR, Edrev GE, Kyurkchiev SD, Kehayov IR. Elevated autoantibodies in sera from<br />
otosclerotic patients are related to the disease duration. Acta Otolaryngol 118: 375-80,<br />
1998.<br />
Lolov SR, Encheva VI, Kyurkchiev SD, Edrev GE, Kehayov IR. Antimeasles<br />
immunoglobulin G in sera <strong>of</strong> patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong> is lower than that in healthy<br />
people. Otol Neurotol 22: 766-70, 2001.<br />
Ludman H, Grant H. The case against bilateral stapedectomy, and problems <strong>of</strong> postoperative<br />
follow-up from the King's College Hospital series. J Laryngol Otol 87: 833-<br />
43, 1973.<br />
Mafee MF, Henrikson GC, Deitch RL, Norouzi P, Kumar A, Kris R, Valvassori GE. Use<br />
<strong>of</strong> CT in stapedial <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Radiology 156: 707-14, 1985.<br />
Mahendran S, Hogg R, Robinson JM. To divide or manipulate the chorda tympani in<br />
stapedotomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262: 482-7, 2005.<br />
Mann WJ, Amedee RG, Fuerst G, Tabb HG. Hearing loss as a complication <strong>of</strong> stapes<br />
surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115: 324-8, 1996.<br />
Marchese MR, Cianfrone F, Passali GC, Paludetti G. Hearing results after stapedotomy:<br />
role <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis diameter. Audiol Neurootol 12: 221-5, 2007.<br />
74
References<br />
Markou K, Goudakos J. An overview <strong>of</strong> the etiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Eur Arch<br />
Otorhinolaryngol 266: 25-35, 2009.<br />
Maureen TH. Audiological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Otolaryngologic Clinics <strong>of</strong> North America 26: 373-87, 1993.<br />
McGee TM. The loose wire syndrome. Laryngoscope 91: 1478-83, 1981.<br />
McKenna MJ, Kristiansen AG, Tropitzsch AS. Similar COLA1 expression in <strong>fi</strong>broblasts<br />
from some patients with clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong> and those with type I osteogenesis<br />
imperfecta. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111: 184-9, 2002.<br />
McKenna MJ, Mills BG. Immunohistochemical evidence <strong>of</strong> measles virus antigens in<br />
active <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101: 415-21, 1989.<br />
McKenna MJ, Mills BG. Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical evidence <strong>of</strong> measles<br />
virus in active <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 470: 130-40, 1990.<br />
McKenna MJ, Mills BG, Galey FR, Linthicum FH Jr. Filamentous structures<br />
morphologically similar to viral nucleocapsids in otosclerotic lesions in two patients.<br />
Am J Otol 7: 25-8, 1986.<br />
Menger DJ, Tange RA. The aetiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: a review <strong>of</strong> the literature. Clin<br />
Otolaryngol 28: 112-20, 2003.<br />
Miani C, Bergamin AM, Barotti A, Isola M. Multifrequency multicomponent<br />
tympanometry in normal and otosclerotic ears. Scand Audiol 29: 225-37, 2000.<br />
Mills BG, Singer FR. Nuclear inclusions in Paget's disease <strong>of</strong> bone. Science 194: 201-2,<br />
1976.<br />
Moon CN Jr. Perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stulas complicating the stapedectomy operation. A review <strong>of</strong><br />
forty-nine cases. Laryngoscope 80: 515-31, 1970.<br />
Mosnier I, Bouccara D, Ambert-Dahan E, Ferrary E, Sterkers O. Cochlear implantation<br />
and far-advanced <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65: 323-7, 2007.<br />
Motta G, Moscillo L. Functional results in stapedotomy with and without CO(2) laser.<br />
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 64: 307-10, 2002.<br />
Moumoulidis I, Axon P, Baguley D, Reid E. A review on the genetics <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Clin<br />
Otolaryngol 32: 239-47, 2007.<br />
Naumann IC, Porcellini B, Fisch U. Otosclerosis: incidence <strong>of</strong> positive <strong>fi</strong>ndings on highresolution<br />
computed tomography and their correlation to audiological test data. Ann<br />
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114: 709-16, 2005.<br />
75
References<br />
Nelson EG, Hinojosa R. Questioning the relationship between cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong> and<br />
sensorineural hearing loss: a quantitative evaluation <strong>of</strong> cochlear structures in cases <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> and review <strong>of</strong> the literature. Laryngoscope 114: 1214-30, 2004.<br />
Niedermeyer HP, Arnold W. Otosclerosis: a measles virus associated inflammatory<br />
disease. Acta Otolaryngol 115: 300-3, 1995.<br />
Niedermeyer HP, Arnold W, Schwub D, Busch R, Wiest I, Sedlmeier R. Shift <strong>of</strong> the<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> age in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Acta Otolaryngol 121: 197-9, 2001.<br />
Niedermeyer HP, Becker ET, Arnold W. Expression <strong>of</strong> collagens in the otosclerotic bone.<br />
Adv Otorhinollaryngol 65: 45-9, 2007.<br />
Nielsen TR, Thomsen J. Meningitis following stapedotomy: a rare and early complication.<br />
J Laryngol Otol 114: 781-3, 2000.<br />
Nylen B. Histopathological investigations on the localization, number, activity and extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> otosclerotic foci. J Laryng 63: 321-27, 1949.<br />
Oliveira CA. How does stapes surgery influence severe disabling tinnitus in <strong>otosclerosis</strong><br />
patients? Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65: 343-7, 2007.<br />
Padoan S, Korttila K, Magnusson M, Pyykkö I, Shalen L. Reduction <strong>of</strong> gain and time<br />
constant <strong>of</strong> vestibulo-ocular reflex in man induced by diazepam and thiopental. J<br />
Vestib Res 1: 97-104, 1990-1991.<br />
Palva T. Argon laser in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 104: 153-7, 1987.<br />
Paparella MM, Cureoglu S, Shao W, Schachern PA. Otosclerosis and associated<br />
otopathologic conditions. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65: 31-44, 2007.<br />
Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Bilateral cochlear implants should be the standard for children<br />
with bilateral sensorineural deafness. Curr Opin Otolaryngol head Neck Surg 16: 69-<br />
74, 2008.<br />
Parahy C, Linthicum FH Jr. Otosclerosis: relationship <strong>of</strong> spiral ligament hyalinization to<br />
sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 93: 717-20, 1983.<br />
Pauw BK, Pollak AM, Fisch U. Utricle, saccule, and cochlear duct in relation to<br />
stapedotomy. A histologic human temporal bone study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol<br />
100: 966-70, 1991.<br />
Pearson RD, Kurland LT, Cody DT. Incidence <strong>of</strong> diagnosed clinical <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Arch<br />
Otolaryngol 99: 288-91, 1974.<br />
Pedersen U, Madsen M, Lamm LU, Elbrønd O. HLA-A, -B, -C antigens in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. J<br />
Laryngol Otol 97: 1095-7, 1983.<br />
76
References<br />
Perkings RC. Laser stapedotomy for <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Laryngoscope 90: 228-42, 1980.<br />
Perkins R, Curto FS Jr. Laser stapedotomy: a comparative study <strong>of</strong> prostheses and seals.<br />
Laryngoscope 102: 1321-7, 1992.<br />
Persson P, Harder H, Magnuson B. Hearing results in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> surgery after partial<br />
stapedectomy, total stapedectomy and stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 117: 94-9, 1997.<br />
Politzer A. History <strong>of</strong> otology. Columella Press, Virginia, 1981: 136-43.<br />
Porter MJ, Zeitoun H, Brookes GB. The Glasgow bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot used assess the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
bilateral stapedectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 20: 68-71, 1995.<br />
Precechtel A. Determination <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> pregnancy on the activation <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Acta Otolaryngol 63: 121-7, 1967.<br />
Probst R. Audiological evaluation <strong>of</strong> patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:<br />
119-26, 2007.<br />
Ramsay H, Kärkkäinen J, Palva T. Success in surgery for <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: hearing<br />
improvement and other indicators. Am J Otol 18: 23-8, 1997.<br />
Raut VV, Toner JG, Kerr AG, Stevenson M . Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> in the UK. Clin<br />
Otolaryngol 27: 113-9, 2002.<br />
Reshetnikov NN, Popova TI. IgA, IgM and IgG levels and antibodies to native DNA and<br />
collagen type II in the perilymph <strong>of</strong> patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Vestn Otorinolaringol 3:<br />
14-6, 1992.<br />
Rizer FM, Lippy WH. Evolution <strong>of</strong> techniques <strong>of</strong> stapedectomy from the total<br />
stapedectomy to the small fenestra stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 26: 443-<br />
51, 1993.<br />
Robinson DA, Zee DS, Hain TC, Holmes A, Rosenberg LF. Alexander's law: its behavior<br />
and origin in the human vestibulo-ocular reflex. Ann Neurol 16: 714-22, 1984.<br />
Rosowski JJ, Mehta RP, Merchant SN. Diagnostic utility <strong>of</strong> laser-Doppler vibrometry in<br />
conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol 24: 165-75,<br />
2003.<br />
Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN. Mechanical and acoustic analysis <strong>of</strong> middle ear<br />
reconstruction. Am J Otol 16: 486-97, 1995.<br />
Rottach KG, Wohlgemuth WA, Dzaja AE, Eggert T, Straube A. Effect <strong>of</strong> intravenous<br />
opioids on eye movements in humans: possible mechanisms. J Neurol 249: 1200-5,<br />
2002.<br />
77
References<br />
Rotteveel LJ, Proops DW, Ramsden RT, Saeed SR, van Olphen AF, Mylanus EA.<br />
Cochlear implantation in 53 patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: demographics, computed<br />
tomographic scanning, surgery, and complications. Otol Neurotol 25: 943-52, 2004.<br />
Ruckenstein MJ, Rafter KO, Montes M, Bigelow DC. Management <strong>of</strong> far advanced<br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong> in the era <strong>of</strong> cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 22: 471-4, 2001.<br />
Ruedi L. Otosclerotic lesion and cochlear degeneration. Arch Otolaryngol 89: 364-71,<br />
1969.<br />
Sabitha R, Ramalingam R, Ramalingam KK, Sivakumaran TA, Ramesh A. Genetics <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. J Laryngol Otol 111: 109-12, 1997.<br />
Salvinelli F, Casale M, Vitaliana L, Greco F, Dianzani C, D'Ascanio L. Delayed<br />
peripheral facial palsy in the stapes surgery: can it be prevented? Am J Otolaryngol 25:<br />
105-8, 2004.<br />
Sarikkola AU, Kontkanen M, Kivela T, Laatikainen L. Simultaneous bilateral cataract<br />
surgery: a retrospective survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 1335-41, 2004.<br />
Schmerber S, Karkas A, Righini CA, Chahine KA. The quartile bene<strong>fi</strong>t plot: a middle ear<br />
surgery bene<strong>fi</strong>t assessment scheme. Laryngoscope 118: 843-8, 2008.<br />
Schmerber S, Cuisnier O, Charachon R, Lavieille JP. Vein versus tragal perichondrium in<br />
stapedotomy. Otol Neurotol 25: 694-8, 2004.<br />
Schuknecht HF. Stapedectomy and Graft-Prosthesis Operation. Acta otolaryngol 51: 241-<br />
3, 1960.<br />
Schuknecht HF Sensorineural hearing loss following stapedectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 54:<br />
336-48, 1962.<br />
Schuknecht HF. Pathology <strong>of</strong> the ear. Harvard University Press, Cambridge,<br />
Massachusetts and London, 1974: 351-73.<br />
Schuknecht HF, Barber W. Histologic variants in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Laryngoscope 95: 130-17,<br />
1985.<br />
Schuknecht HF, Kirchner JC. Cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: fact or fantasy. Laryngoscope 84:<br />
766-82, 1974.<br />
Seicshnaydre MA, Sismanis A, Hughes GB. Update <strong>of</strong> reparative granuloma: survey <strong>of</strong><br />
the American Otological Society and the American Neurotology Society. Am J Otol<br />
15: 155-60, 1994.<br />
Sennaroğlu L, Unal OF, Sennaroğlu G, Gürsel B, Belgin E. Effect <strong>of</strong> Teflon piston<br />
diameter on hearing result after stapedotomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124: 279-<br />
81, 2001.<br />
78
References<br />
Shabana YK, Ghonim MR, Pedersen CB. Stapedotomy: does prosthesis diameter affect<br />
outcome? Clin Otolaryngol 24: 91-4, 1999.<br />
Shambaugh GE, Glasscock ME. Surgery <strong>of</strong> the ear. W.B. Saunders Company,<br />
Philadelphia, London, Toronto, 1980: 476-516.<br />
Shambaugh GE, Scott A. Sodium fluoride for arrest <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>; theoretical<br />
considerations. Arch Otolaryngol 80: 263-70, 1964.<br />
Shea JJ. Symposium on the operation for mobilization <strong>of</strong> the stapes in otosclerotic<br />
deafness. Laryngoscope 66: 729-84, 1956.<br />
Shea JJ. Fenestration <strong>of</strong> the oval window. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 67: 932-51, 1958.<br />
Shea JJ. Stapedectomy - long-term report. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 91: 516-20, 1982.<br />
Shea JJ. Thirty years <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery. J Laryngol Otol 102: 14-9, 1988.<br />
Shea JJ Jr. Forty years <strong>of</strong> stapes surgery. Am J Otol 19: 52-5, 1998.<br />
Shea JJ Jr, Ge X. Delayed facial palsy after stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 22: 465-70,<br />
2001.<br />
Sheehy JL, Nelson RA, House HP. Revision stapedectomy: a review <strong>of</strong> 258 cases.<br />
Laryngoscope 91: 43-51, 1981.<br />
Shin YJ, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Cognard C, Charlet JP, Sevely A. Sensorineural Hearing<br />
Loss and Otosclerosis: A Clinical and Radiologic Survey <strong>of</strong> 437 Cases. Acta<br />
Otolaryngol 121: 200-4, 2001.<br />
Shulman A, Strashun AM, Afriyie M, Aronson F, Abel W, Goldstein B. SPECT Imaging<br />
<strong>of</strong> Brain and Tinnitus-Neurotologic/Neurologic Implications. Int Tinnitus J 1: 13-29,<br />
1995.<br />
Silverstein H. Laser stapedotomy minus prosthesis (laser STAMP): a minimally invasive<br />
procedure. Am J Otol 19: 277-82, 1998.<br />
Silverstein H, Hester TO, Deems D, Rosenberg S, Grosby N, Kwiatkowski T. Outcome<br />
after laser stapedotomy with and without preservation <strong>of</strong> the stapedius tendon. Ear<br />
Nose Throat J 78: 923-8, 1999.<br />
Silverstein H, H<strong>of</strong>fmann KK, Thompson JH Jr, Rosenberg SI, Sleeper JP. Hearing<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> laser stapedotomy minus prosthesis (STAMP) versus conventional laser<br />
stapedotomy. Otol Neurotol 25: 106-11, 2004.<br />
Silverstein H, Rosenberg S, Jones R. Small fenestra stapedotomies with and without KTP<br />
laser: A comparison. Laryngoscope 99: 485-8, 1989.<br />
79
References<br />
Singbartl F, Basta D, Seidl RO, Ernst A, Todt I. Perioperative recordings <strong>of</strong> vestibularevoked<br />
myogenic potentials in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otol Neurotol 27: 1070-3, 2006.<br />
Singhal SK, Mann SB, Datta U, Panda NK, Gupta AK. Genetic correlation in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Am J Otolaryngol 20: 102-5, 1999.<br />
Smith MC, Simon P, Ramalingam KK. Delayed facial palsy following uncomplicated<br />
stapedectomy. J Laryngol Otol 104: 611-2, 1990.<br />
Smyth GDL, Kerr AG, Singh KP. Second ear stapedectomy-a continued controversy. J<br />
Laryngol Otol 89: 1047-56, 1975.<br />
Smyth GDL, Patterson CC. Results <strong>of</strong> middle ear reconstruction: do patients and surgeons<br />
agree? Am J Otolaryngol 6: 276-9, 1985.<br />
Snyder BD, Boies LR Jr, Ulvestad RF, McGuiness PA. Delayed meningitis following<br />
stapes surgery. Arch Neurol 36: 174-5, 1979.<br />
Somers T, Govaerts P, Marquet T, Offeciers E. Statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong> surgery<br />
performed by Jean Marquet. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103: 945-51, 1994.<br />
Sørensen MS, Nielsen LP, Bretlau P, Jørgensen MB. The role <strong>of</strong> type II collagen<br />
autoimmunity in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> revisited. Acta Otolaryngol 105: 242-7, 1988.<br />
Spandow O, Soderberg O, Bohlin L. Long-term results in otosclerotic patients operated by<br />
stapedectomy and stapedotomy. Scand Audiol 29: 186-90, 2000.<br />
Stapleton E, Mills R, Tham C. Sacculo-collic response in <strong>otosclerosis</strong> and following<br />
successful stapes surgery. J Laryngol Otol 122: 347-50, 2008.<br />
STAKES. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health.<br />
www.stakes.<strong>fi</strong>/FI/tilastot/aiheittain/Terveyspalvelut/laitoshoito/benchmarking.htm<br />
Sugiura M, Naganawa S, Sone M, Yoshida T, Nakashima T. Three-dimensional fluidattenuated<br />
inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging <strong>fi</strong>ndings in a patient with<br />
cochlear <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Auris Nasus Larynx 35: 269-72, 2008.<br />
Tange RA, de Bruijn AJG, Grolman W. Experience with a new pure gold piston in<br />
stapedotomy for cases <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Auris Nasus Larynx 25: 249-53, 1998.<br />
Tange RA, Grolman W. An analysis <strong>of</strong> the air-bone gap closure obtained by a crimping<br />
and a non-crimping titanium stapes prosthesis in <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Auris Nasus Larynx 35:<br />
181-4, 2008.<br />
Tange RA, Grolman W, Dreschler WA. Gold and titanium in the oval window: a<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> two metal stapes prostheses. Otol Neurotol 25: 102-5, 2004.<br />
80
References<br />
Toner JG, Smyth GDL. Comparison <strong>of</strong> methods <strong>of</strong> evaluating hearing bene<strong>fi</strong>t <strong>of</strong> middle<br />
ear surgery. J Laryngol Otol 107: 4-5, 1993.<br />
Topsakal V, Fransen E, Schmerber S, Declau F, Yung M, Gordts F, Van Camp G, Van de<br />
Heyning P. Audiometric analyses con<strong>fi</strong>rm a cochlear component, disproportional to<br />
age, in stapedial <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. Otol Neurotol 27: 781-7, 2006.<br />
Tribukait A, Bergenius J. The subjective visual horizontal after stapedotomy: evidence for<br />
an increased resting activity in otolithic affrents. Acta Otolaryngol 118: 299-306, 1998.<br />
Tshifularo MI, Joseph CA. Otosclerosis among South African indigenous blacks. East Afr<br />
Med J 85: 223-5, 2005.<br />
Uzicanin A, Eggers R, Webb E, Harris B, Durrheim D, Ogunbanjo G, Isaacs V,<br />
Hawkridge A, Biellik R, Strebel P. Impact <strong>of</strong> the 1996-1997 supplementary measles<br />
vaccination campaigns in South Africa. Int J Epidemiol 31: 968-76, 2002.<br />
Vartiainen E. Sex differences in patients with hearing impairments caused by <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 256: 431-3, 1999.<br />
Vartiainen E, Vartiainen J. The effect <strong>of</strong> drinking water fluoridation on the natural course<br />
<strong>of</strong> hearing in patients with <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.Acta Otolaryngol 116: 747-50, 1996.<br />
Vartiainen E, Vartiainen J. The influence <strong>of</strong> fluoridation <strong>of</strong> drinking water on the longterm<br />
hearing results <strong>of</strong> stapedectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 22: 34-6, 1997a.<br />
Vartiainen E, Vartiainen T. Effect <strong>of</strong> drinking water fluoridation on the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>otosclerosis</strong>. J Laryngol Otol 111: 20-2, 1997b.<br />
Verschuur HP, de Wever WW, van Benthem PP. Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean and<br />
clean-contaminated ear surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003996.<br />
Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M. Surgical <strong>fi</strong>ndings and long-term hearing<br />
results in 3050 Stapedotomies for primary <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: a prospective study with the<br />
otology-neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 27: S25-S47, 2006.<br />
Vrabec JT, Coker NJ. Stapes surgery in the United States. Otol Neurotol 25: 465-9, 2004.<br />
Wang PC, Merchant SN, McKenna MJ, Glynn RJ, Nadol JB Jr. Does <strong>otosclerosis</strong> occur<br />
only in the temporal bone? Am J Otol 20: 162-5, 1999.<br />
Wang ZM, Chi FL, Dai CF. Modi<strong>fi</strong>ed stapes prosthesis to limit postoperative vertigo.<br />
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132: 50-4, 2005.<br />
Welling DB, Glasscock ME 3rd, Gantz BJ. Avulsion <strong>of</strong> the anomalous facial nerve at<br />
stapedectomy. Laryngoscope 102: 729-33, 1992.<br />
81
References<br />
Wengen DF. A new self-retaining titanium clip stapes prosthesis. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol<br />
65: 184-9, 2007.<br />
Wiet RJ, Harvey SA, Bauer GP. Complications in stapes surgery. Options for prevention<br />
and management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 26: 471-90, 1993.<br />
Wiet RJ, Kubek DC, Lemberg P, Byskosh AT. A meta-analysis review <strong>of</strong> revision stapes<br />
surgery with argon laser: effectiveness and safety. Am J Otol 18: 166-71, 1997.<br />
Williams MD, Antonelli PJ, Williams LS, Moorhead JE. Middle ear prosthesis<br />
displacements in high-strength magnetic <strong>fi</strong>elds. Otol Neurotol 22: 158-61, 2001.<br />
Zarroug AE, Hamner CE, Pham TH, Houghton SG, Stavlo P, Moir CR, Rodeberg DA.<br />
Bilateral staged versus bilateral simultaneous thoracotomy in the pediatric population.<br />
J Pediatr Surg 41: 647-51, 2006.<br />
Zhao F, Wada H, Koike T, Ohyama K, Kawase T, Stephens D. Transient evoked<br />
otoacoustic emissions in patients with middle ear disorders. Int J Audiol 42: 117-31,<br />
2003.<br />
Ziyeh S, Berlis A, Ross UH, Reinhardt MJ, Schumacher M. MRI <strong>of</strong> active <strong>otosclerosis</strong>.<br />
Neuroradiology 39: 453-7, 1997.<br />
Yoo TJ. Etiopathogenesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>otosclerosis</strong>: a hypothesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93: 28-<br />
33, 1984.<br />
82
Appendix<br />
Questionnaire used to assess patients’ personal estimation <strong>of</strong> hearing gain, vestibular symptoms and<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life. Data were collected preoperatively and at one, 3 and 12 months postoperatively.<br />
Numerical scores (1-5) were given to the corresponding subjective symptoms during data analysis.<br />
Nimi:__________________________________ Pvm:______________________________<br />
Kyselykaavake Otoskleroosipotilaan Kuulosta Ja Huimauksesta<br />
Olkaa hyvä ja vastatkaa kaikkiin kysymyksiin. Vastatkaa numeroin tai ympyröikää vaihtoehto, joka parhaiten<br />
kuvaa vointianne. Valitkaa vain yksi vaihtoehto joka kysymyksestä.<br />
1. Monta vähintään 20 minuutin kiertohuimauskohtausta teillä on ollut viimeisen 6 kuukauden aikana ?<br />
____ kpl<br />
2. Kuuloni on<br />
1. ============== 2. ============== 3. ============= 4. ============= 5.<br />
Erinomainen Hyvä Kohtalainen Huono Erittäin huono<br />
3. Minua huimaa:<br />
1. ============== 2. ============== 3. ============= 4. ============= 5.<br />
Harvoin Silloin tällöin Puolet ajasta Enimmäkseen Aina<br />
4. Kun minua huimaa, oireeni on useimmiten:<br />
1. ============== 2. ============= 3. ============== 4. ============= 5.<br />
Erittäin lievä Lievä Kohtalainen Kohtalaisen vaikea Vaikea<br />
5. Minkälainen on huimaukseni vaikutus päivittäisiin toimintoihin kuten työntekoon, autolla ajoon,<br />
ostoksilla käyntiin, perheestä ja itsestä huolehtimiseen?<br />
1. ============= 2. ============== 3. ============= 4. ============= 5.<br />
Ei vaikutusta Lievä Kohtalainen Suuri Erityisen suuri<br />
6. Mikä on vointini vaikutus yleiseen elämänlaatuuni? Esimerkiksi sosiaalisiin aktiviteetteihin, läheisiin suhteisiin, tulevai<br />
suunnitelmiin, työn saantiin tai työssä käyntiin ja vapaa-aikaan:<br />
1. ============= 2. ============== 3. ============= 4. ============ 5.<br />
Ei vaikutusta Lievä Kohtalainen Suuri Erityisen suuri<br />
7. Pelkään saavani huimausta:<br />
1. ============= 2. ============== 3. ============= 4. ============ 5.<br />
En koskaan Harvoin Silloin tällöin Usein Aina<br />
8. Onko vointini verrattuna viime kertaiseen käyntiini?<br />
1. ============= 2. ============== 3. ============= 4. ============ 5.<br />
Huomattavasti Jonkin verran Samanlainen Jonkin verran Huomattavasti<br />
huonompi huonompi parempi parempi<br />
83
Original publications<br />
84