Galactic Cosmic Rays - GFZ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Pierce & Adams (2009: Geophys.Res.Lett.)Cloud condensation nuclei at solarmin/ solar-max• Standard assumptionon the influence ofionization• Extreme assumptionon the influence ofionization
Pierce & Adams (2009: Geophys.Res.Lett.)In both simulations the CCN signal from changes incosmic rays over a solar cycle is very weakThe consequence is a negligible radiative forcing(~0.01 W m -2 )
Page 1 and 2: Nacreous clouds over Oslo Source:Ae
Page 3: Correlations betweenGalactic Cosmic
Page 6 and 7: Suggested Mechanisms• Absorption
Page 8 and 9: GCR Ion Production vs. HeightSolar
Page 10 and 11: Forbush Decrease Events
Page 12 and 13: Kristjánsson et al. (2008: ACP)Reg
Page 16: Signals of cosmic rays in particle
Page 19: Signals in SW or LW Radiation atTOA
Page 23: Net Cloud Forcing• Following an F
Page 26 and 27: Correlations between cosmic raysand
Page 29 and 30: Aerosol NucleationMeasurementsKulma
Page 31 and 32: Will the CERN experiments bring new
Page 34 and 35: Yu et al. (2008: ACP)Aerosol Nuclea
Page 38 and 39: Rising Temperatures - No Trend in C
Page 40 and 41: Foto: Michael GaussThank you!http:/
Page 42 and 43: How relevant are Svensmark’sfindi
Page 45 and 46: Ionization distribution• Calculat
Page 47 and 48: GCR, TSI and Low CloudsKristjánsso
Page 49 and 50: Foukal et al. (2004: Science)Blue c
Page 51 and 52: Pre-historic climate variations and
Page 53 and 54: Is the signal really coming from lo

Galactic Cosmic Rays - GFZ

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?