11.07.2015 Views

Exact Exchange in Density Functional Calculations

Exact Exchange in Density Functional Calculations

Exact Exchange in Density Functional Calculations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.3 Approximations to the Optimized Potential Method 33If the energy functional also depend on the KS eigenvalues, there would be an additional termδɛ i ∂E= ∑ i |φ i(r)| 2 ∂E/∂ɛ i on the right hand side of (5.12). The part∑iδv s(r) ∂ɛ i∫dr ′ G i (r, r ′ ) ( v(r ′ ) − ˆv NL) φ i (r ′ )is sometimes denoted the orbital shift ψ i (r) [64]. It is the first order shift of the orbitals with thelocal potential, towards those with the non-local potential. In terms of the orbital shifts, the OEPequation is ∑ i f iψ ∗ i (r)φ i(r) + c.c. = 0.The OEP equation (5.12) is quite difficult to solve numerically. First of all it is an <strong>in</strong>tegralequation, and secondly the summation <strong>in</strong> the Green’s function (5.10) run over all states, occupied aswell as unoccupied. The denom<strong>in</strong>ator of the Green’s function will obviously <strong>in</strong>crease monotonically,so highly excited states becomes less important, but <strong>in</strong> practice a large number of unoccupiedstates have to be <strong>in</strong>cluded to obta<strong>in</strong> convergence. The difficulties of solv<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tegral equationis illustrated by the fact that it has so far only been solved directly for spherically averaged isolatedatoms.5.3 Approximations to the Optimized Potential MethodIn the Krieger-Li-Iafrate (KLI) approximation [57], the energy difference <strong>in</strong> the denom<strong>in</strong>ator ofthe Green’s function is approximated by a constants ɛ l − ɛ k = ∆¯ɛ. Us<strong>in</strong>g the closure relation∑i φ i(r)φ i (r ′ ) = δ(r−r ′ ) the Green’s function thus becomes G i (r, r ′ ) ≈ (δ(r−r ′ )−φ i (r)φ ∗ i (r′ ))/∆¯ɛ.When this is done, the actual value of the constant disappears, and the result<strong>in</strong>g equations arev(r) = 1 ∑f i φ ∗ i (r) ( 〈i|ˆv − ˆv NL |i〉 + ˆv NL) φ i (r) + c.c.2n(r)i= 1 ∑ [f i φ∗n(r)i (r)ˆv NL φ i (r) + |φ i (r)| 2 〈i|ˆv − ˆv NL |i〉 ] (5.14)iwhere∫〈i|ˆv − ˆv NL |i〉 =drφ ∗ i (r) ( v(r) − ˆv NL) φ i (r) (5.15)The approximation of a constant energy denom<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>in</strong> G i (r, r ′ ) might seem crude, but it turnsout that the exact same equation can be derived us<strong>in</strong>g a mean-field approximation (the onlyapproximation done is neglect<strong>in</strong>g a term which when averaged over the density is zero).For the exact exchange potential, the KLI equation can be written asv x (r) = vxSla (r) + ∑ i|φ i (r)| 2f i 〈i|ˆv x − ˆv x NL |i〉 (5.16)n(r)A different approximation of the OEP equation for exact exchange can be reached, by assum<strong>in</strong>gthat the orbitals of HF and exact exchange only DFT are identical. This approximation leads tothe equationv x (r) = vxSla (r) + ∑ ijφ ∗ if i f (r)φ j(r)j 〈j|ˆv x − ˆv x NL |i〉 (5.17)n(r)which is known as the localized Hartree-Fock (LHF) method [51].The equations (5.16) and (5.17) only def<strong>in</strong>e the potential to with<strong>in</strong> a constant. The usualasymptotic behavior v x (r → ∞) = 0 is recovered if one neglects the HOMO term <strong>in</strong> the summationof (5.16) or the HOMO-HOMO term of (5.17).S<strong>in</strong>ce v(r) appears on both sides of the KLI equation (5.14), the potential has to be determ<strong>in</strong>edby a self-consistent approach <strong>in</strong> general. In the case of exact exchange one can derive a set ofl<strong>in</strong>ear equations determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the constants 〈i|ˆv|i〉, thus mak<strong>in</strong>g it possible to solve (5.16) <strong>in</strong> oneevaluation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!