23.11.2012 Views

Minutes For 9th July 2012 PDF - Brune Park Community College

Minutes For 9th July 2012 PDF - Brune Park Community College

Minutes For 9th July 2012 PDF - Brune Park Community College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50. Mr Kelly reported on a possible HCC change to the linked schools and catchment areas which<br />

was being discussed and challenged by local Headteachers. The current situation would<br />

continue for one year only and was being reviewed by the county.<br />

51. Governors were concerned and asked to be kept informed of the decisions made by the local<br />

authority and the implications it would have for <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and for other schools in the area.<br />

Action: Mr Kelly<br />

ITEM 10 – EDUCATION PERSONNEL SERVICE SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (EPS SLA)<br />

52. Mrs Kelly referred governors to Paper J giving details of the EPS SLA and noted that the<br />

decision had been taken by Mrs Rose (Chair of Governors), Mr Clinton (Vice Chair of<br />

Governors) and Mr Kelly, Headteacher Designate to continue with the EPS SLA for the next<br />

three years.<br />

53. Governors were content to accept this.<br />

54. Mrs Kelly left the meeting at 6.40pm.<br />

ITEM 11 – CHANGE OF SCHOOL NAME<br />

55. At the meeting held on 21 st May <strong>2012</strong> governors had voted unanimously to amend the name of<br />

the school from <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>College</strong> to <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> School with effect<br />

from 1 st September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

56. It had not been made clear to governors at that meeting that by changing the name with effect<br />

from 1 st September <strong>2012</strong>, the governing body would need to change the constitution under the<br />

new regulations, as detailed in Paper C.<br />

57. Governors were asked to vote on the change of the date that this would take effect from and<br />

unanimously agreed to change the school name with effect to 31 st August <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

58. Governors decided to have a discussion about the future constitution in the autumn term.<br />

Action: Clerk<br />

ITEM 12 – HEADTEACHER’S REPORT TO GOVERNORS<br />

59. Governors noted the Headteacher’s report to governors and in the absence of the Executive<br />

Headteacher Mr Rolfe answered questions.<br />

60. Governors discussed the fixed penalty notices for absences and the effect of the proposed<br />

changes to the HCC Educational Welfare Officers (EWO). It was possible that this<br />

responsibility would pass to the schools either for September or the following year. The 14-19<br />

Fareham and Gosport Consortium had raised this as an issue and wanted to ensure there was<br />

consistency across the area. Mr Kelly would keep governors informed.<br />

Action: Mr Kelly<br />

61. Governors referred to the exclusion data and asked if the school had the adequate support in<br />

place to try to prevent further exclusions. Mr Rolfe noted there was a rising scale of exclusions,<br />

dependant on the situation. Readmission meetings with parents took place, and Governors’<br />

Discipline Committees met where required. Support and intervention strategies were in place.<br />

62. Governors asked if the school was targeting the individual problems of why an excluded<br />

student’s behaviour had led to the exclusion.<br />

63. Mr Rolfe noted there were several sanctions used before fixed term exclusions. Governors<br />

noted that the number of exclusions were comparably lower than other schools in Hampshire.<br />

The importance of continuing with learning was noted along with continuing the behaviour<br />

support strategies there were already in place.<br />

64. Mr Rolfe noted that half of the number of students excluded had not been excluded again this<br />

year. Mr Kelly noted the good partnership working with Quayside and other agencies and the<br />

importance of linking all the sanctions and support strategies and reported that there was a lot<br />

of good practice already in place at <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

65. Governors understood that persistent poor behaviour would disrupt the learning of other<br />

students in the school.<br />

66. Governors referred to the number of seclusions and asked if they were effective. Mr Rolfe<br />

noted the seclusions, which ran from 2.30pm – 5pm, and noted that where these took place, the<br />

timing and who would supervise the seclusions would be discussed. Some schools used<br />

inclusion rooms with trained staff but there would be a cost to this. Governors asked to be kept<br />

informed.<br />

67. Governors noted that the teaching staff absence peaked in November and March and asked if<br />

there was a reason for this; it was noted that these months were full months and the figures<br />

could appear higher.<br />

68. The school was looking at the options for filling the Teacher of Science post and governors<br />

asked if all appointments had been filled. Governors were informed that there were still some<br />

Full Governing Body Meeting – 9 th <strong>July</strong> <strong>2012</strong>. Page 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!