Minutes For 9th July 2012 PDF - Brune Park Community College
Minutes For 9th July 2012 PDF - Brune Park Community College
Minutes For 9th July 2012 PDF - Brune Park Community College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
50. Mr Kelly reported on a possible HCC change to the linked schools and catchment areas which<br />
was being discussed and challenged by local Headteachers. The current situation would<br />
continue for one year only and was being reviewed by the county.<br />
51. Governors were concerned and asked to be kept informed of the decisions made by the local<br />
authority and the implications it would have for <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and for other schools in the area.<br />
Action: Mr Kelly<br />
ITEM 10 – EDUCATION PERSONNEL SERVICE SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (EPS SLA)<br />
52. Mrs Kelly referred governors to Paper J giving details of the EPS SLA and noted that the<br />
decision had been taken by Mrs Rose (Chair of Governors), Mr Clinton (Vice Chair of<br />
Governors) and Mr Kelly, Headteacher Designate to continue with the EPS SLA for the next<br />
three years.<br />
53. Governors were content to accept this.<br />
54. Mrs Kelly left the meeting at 6.40pm.<br />
ITEM 11 – CHANGE OF SCHOOL NAME<br />
55. At the meeting held on 21 st May <strong>2012</strong> governors had voted unanimously to amend the name of<br />
the school from <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>College</strong> to <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Community</strong> School with effect<br />
from 1 st September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
56. It had not been made clear to governors at that meeting that by changing the name with effect<br />
from 1 st September <strong>2012</strong>, the governing body would need to change the constitution under the<br />
new regulations, as detailed in Paper C.<br />
57. Governors were asked to vote on the change of the date that this would take effect from and<br />
unanimously agreed to change the school name with effect to 31 st August <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
58. Governors decided to have a discussion about the future constitution in the autumn term.<br />
Action: Clerk<br />
ITEM 12 – HEADTEACHER’S REPORT TO GOVERNORS<br />
59. Governors noted the Headteacher’s report to governors and in the absence of the Executive<br />
Headteacher Mr Rolfe answered questions.<br />
60. Governors discussed the fixed penalty notices for absences and the effect of the proposed<br />
changes to the HCC Educational Welfare Officers (EWO). It was possible that this<br />
responsibility would pass to the schools either for September or the following year. The 14-19<br />
Fareham and Gosport Consortium had raised this as an issue and wanted to ensure there was<br />
consistency across the area. Mr Kelly would keep governors informed.<br />
Action: Mr Kelly<br />
61. Governors referred to the exclusion data and asked if the school had the adequate support in<br />
place to try to prevent further exclusions. Mr Rolfe noted there was a rising scale of exclusions,<br />
dependant on the situation. Readmission meetings with parents took place, and Governors’<br />
Discipline Committees met where required. Support and intervention strategies were in place.<br />
62. Governors asked if the school was targeting the individual problems of why an excluded<br />
student’s behaviour had led to the exclusion.<br />
63. Mr Rolfe noted there were several sanctions used before fixed term exclusions. Governors<br />
noted that the number of exclusions were comparably lower than other schools in Hampshire.<br />
The importance of continuing with learning was noted along with continuing the behaviour<br />
support strategies there were already in place.<br />
64. Mr Rolfe noted that half of the number of students excluded had not been excluded again this<br />
year. Mr Kelly noted the good partnership working with Quayside and other agencies and the<br />
importance of linking all the sanctions and support strategies and reported that there was a lot<br />
of good practice already in place at <strong>Brune</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
65. Governors understood that persistent poor behaviour would disrupt the learning of other<br />
students in the school.<br />
66. Governors referred to the number of seclusions and asked if they were effective. Mr Rolfe<br />
noted the seclusions, which ran from 2.30pm – 5pm, and noted that where these took place, the<br />
timing and who would supervise the seclusions would be discussed. Some schools used<br />
inclusion rooms with trained staff but there would be a cost to this. Governors asked to be kept<br />
informed.<br />
67. Governors noted that the teaching staff absence peaked in November and March and asked if<br />
there was a reason for this; it was noted that these months were full months and the figures<br />
could appear higher.<br />
68. The school was looking at the options for filling the Teacher of Science post and governors<br />
asked if all appointments had been filled. Governors were informed that there were still some<br />
Full Governing Body Meeting – 9 th <strong>July</strong> <strong>2012</strong>. Page 4