Current CV - Novel Tech Ethics

45. Baylis, F. (2002). Human embryonic stem cell lines: The ethics of derivation. Journal of Obstetricsand Gynaecology Canada, 24, 159-163.46. Baylis, F. (2002). Human cloning: Three mistakes and an alternative. Journal of Medicine andPhilosophy, 27, 319-337. DOI: 10.1076/jmep.27.3.319.2984 Reprinted in: (2005). E. H. Kluge (Ed.),Readings in biomedical ethics: A Canadian focus 3 rd Edition (pp.488-501).Toronto: Prentice-Hall; and(2004). F. Baylis, J. Downie, B. Hoffmaster, & S. Sherwin (Eds.), Health Care Ethics in Canada(pp.437-448). Toronto: Thomson Nelson.47. Gibson, E., Baylis, F., & Lewis, S. (2002). Dances with the pharmaceutical industry. CanadianMedical Association Journal, 166, 448-450. (35% contribution)48. Baylis, F. (2001). The Canadian stem cell debate: Stuck in the '80s. Journal of the Society ofObstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, 23, 248-252.49. Baylis, F., & Downie, J. (2001). Professional recommendations: Disclosing facts and values. Journalof Medical Ethics, 27, 20-24. DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.1.2050. Lewis, S., Baird, P., Evans, R. G., Ghali, W. A., Wright, C. J., Gibson, E. & Baylis, F. (2001). Dancingwith the porcupine: Rules for governing the university-industry relationship. Canadian MedicalAssociation Journal, 165, 783-785. (5% contribution) Reprinted in: (2005). E. H. Kluge (Ed.),Readings in biomedical ethics: A Canadian focus (pp. 258-262). Toronto: Prentice-Hall; and (2004).F. Baylis, J. Downie, B. Hoffmaster, & S. Sherwin (Eds.), Health Care Ethics in Canada (pp. 340-344). Toronto: Thomson Nelson.51. Baylis, F. (2000). Heroes in bioethics. Hastings Center Report, 30, 34-39. Reprinted in: (2000). B.Freedman, [F. Baylis (Ed.], The roles and responsibilities of the ethics consultant: A retrospectiveanalysis of cases (pp.143-152). Hagerstown, Md: University Publishing Group.52. Baylis, F. (2000). Rebuttal: Expert ethics testimony. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics, 28, 240-242.53. Baylis, F. (2000). Expert testimony by persons trained in ethical reasoning: The case of AndrewSawatzky. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics, 28, 224-231.54. Baylis, F. (2000). Our cells/ourselves: Creating human embryos for stem cell research. Women'sHealth Issues, 10, 140-145. DOI:10.1016/S1049-3867(00)00042-655. Baylis, F. (1999). IRBs: Protecting the well-being of subject-participants with mental disorders thatmay affect decisionmaking capacity. Accountability in Research, 7, 183-199. Reprinted in: (2002). A.Shamoo (Ed.), Research and decisional capacity: Responding to the National Bioethics AdvisoryCommission (pp. 117-133). New York: Taylor & Francis.56. Baylis, F. (1999). Health care ethics consultation: 'Training in virtue'. Human Studies, 22, 25-41. DOI:10.1023/A:1005456601398 Reprinted in: (1999). R. M. Zaner (Ed.), Performance, talk, reflection:What is going on in clinical ethics consultation (pp. 25-41). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.57. Baylis, F., Downie, J., & Kenny, N. (1999). Children and decisionmaking in health research. IRB: Areview of Human Subjects Research, 21, 5-10. Reprinted in: (1999). Health Law Review, 8(2): 3-9.58. Caniano, D. A., & Baylis, F. (1999). Ethical considerations in prenatal surgical consultation. PediatricSurgery International, 15, 303-309. (50% contribution) DOI: 10.1007/s00383005058859. Kenny, N., Weijer, C., & Baylis, F. (1999). Voting ourselves rights: A critique of the Canadian MedicalAssociation charter for physicians. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 161, 399-400. (25%contribution)60. Baylis, F., & Ginn, D. (1998). Expanding access to PEP: Ethical and legal issues. AIDS and PublicPolicy Journal, 13, 140-167. Reprinted and distributed by: (1999). Canadian HIV/AIDSClearinghouse (pp.1-26); also, excerpt reprinted as: (1999). Post-exposure prophylaxis. CanadianHIV/AIDS Policy & Law Newsletter, 4(4):29-38.61. Baylis, F. (1998). Dissenting with the dissent: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area)v. G. (D.F.). Alberta Law Review, 36, 785-798.Françoise Baylis, Page 13