Current CV - Novel Tech Ethics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

13. Fenton, A. Meynell, L. & Baylis F. (2009). Responsibility and speculation: On possible applications ofpediatric fMRI. American Journal of Bioethics 9(1), W1-2. DOI: 10.1080/1526516080267442414. Baylis, F. (2008). Choosing a path: Setting a course for the journey. American Journal of Bioethics8(12), W4-6. DOI: 10.1080/1526516080265936715. Baylis, F. (2008). Commentary in response to: ‘By what authority? Conflicts of interest in professionalethics. Journal of Ethics and Mental Health 3(2)http://www.jemh.ca/issues/v3n2/documents/JEMH_v3n02_1B_commentary_in_Response_By_What_Authority.pdf16. Baylis, F., & Robert, J.S. (2007). Part-human chimeras: Worrying the facts, probing the ethics.American Journal of Bioethics 7(5), 41-45. DOI: 10.1080/1526516070129039717. Baylis, F. (2007). Needed: A Modest Proposal. [Letter to the Editor] Hastings Center Report, 37, 5-6.18. Reid, L., Johnston, J., & Baylis, F. (2006). Editorial from the Special Issue Editors. Journal ofBioethical Inquiry, 3(1/2): 11-13. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-006-9008-319. Baylis, F., & Robert, J.S. (2006). Primer on ethics and crossing species boundaries. AmericanInstitute of Biological Sciences http://www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/baylis_robert.html.20. Baylis, F. (2005). Embryological viability. American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 17-18. DOI:10.1080/1526516050031875321. Baylis, F. (2005). Bioethics. In The Social Sciences and Humanities in Health Research: A CanadianSnapshot of Fields of Study and Innovative Approaches to Understanding and Addressing HealthIssues (pp. 25-26). Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.22. Reid, L., & Baylis, F. (2005). Brains, genes, and the making of the self. American Journal of Bioethics,5, 21-23. DOI: 10.1080/15265160590960401 Reprinted in: (2007) W. Glannon (Ed.) Defining Rightand Wrong in Brain Science: Essential Readings in Neuroethics (pp.163-167). Dana Press.23. Baylis, F. (2005). The impossible dream. University Affairs, (August-September), 14-16; L’impossiblerêve. University Affairs, (August-September), 17-19.24. Baylis, F., & Downie, J. (2005). An embryonic debate. Literary Review of Canada, 13(2), 11-13.25. Baylis, F. (2004). A face is not just like a hand: Pace Barker. American Journal of Bioethics, 4, 30-32.DOI: 10.1080/1526516049049680426. Baylis, F. (2004). Canada bans human cloning. Hastings Center Report, 34, 5.27. Ram N & Baylis, F. (2004). Embryons humains cryoconservés et recherche sur les cellules souchesau Canada. L'Observatoire de la génétique.http://www.ircm.qc.ca/bioethique/obsgenetique/zoom/zoom_04/Z_no16_04/z_no16_04_01.html28. Baylis, F., & Downie, J. (2003). The limits of altruism and arbitrary age limits. American Journal ofBioethics, 3, 19-21. DOI: 10.1162/15265160332261445429. Robert, J. S., & Baylis, F. (2003). A response to commentators on "Crossing species boundaries".American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3), W-66. DOI: 10.1162/1526516036070641730. Baylis, F. (2003). What is wrong with cloning humans? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy,8, 192.31. Baylis, F. (2002). Betwixt and between human stem cell guidelines and legislation. Health LawReview, 11, 44-50.32. Baylis, F. (2002). Canada announces restrictions on publicly funded stem cell research. HastingsCenter Report, 32, 6-7. Excerpt pre-printed in: (2002). ‘Correction’. Stem Cell Research News, 4(2),8.33. Baylis, F. (2002). Invited feature. Human embryonic stem cell research. Canadian Chemical News,54, 30-31.Françoise Baylis, Page 18
34. Baylis, F. (2001). Brickbats and bouquets for the draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.Health Law Review, 10, 3-7.35. Laidlaw, T., Baylis, F., Downie, J., MacLeod, H., & Ludman, M. D. (2001). The inclusion of ethics, lawand communication issues in genetics education: A survey of Canadian medical schools [Specialinsert]. Canadian College of Medical Genetics Newsletter.36. Baylis, F. (2001). Canadian regulation of assisted reproductive technologies? Hastings CenterReport, 31, 8.37. Baylis, F. (2000). The Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee. Hastings Center Report, 30, 52.38. Baylis, F. (1999). Mandating research with children. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 21,10-11.39. Kenny N, & Baylis, F. (1998). Critical reflection and competent care: The ethics of practice [Invitededitorial]. Echo Newsletter, The Medical Council of Canada, 9(2) (4pp). (50% contribution)40. Baylis, F., & Weijer, C. (1997). Remembering Benjamin Freedman (1951-1997) [Invited editorial].Hastings Center Report, 27, 48.41. Baylis, F. (1997). Bioethics scholar remembered [Invited obituary]. Canadian Medical AssociationJournal, 156, 1679. Reprinted in: (2000). B. Freedman, [F. Baylis (Ed.], The Roles andResponsibilities of the Ethics Consultant: A Retrospective Analysis of Cases (p.153). Hagerstown,Md: University Publishing Group.42. Baylis, F. (1993). When a child objects to medical treatment: The case of Philip [Feature article].Ethics in Medical Practice, 3, 1-3, 5. Translated: L’opposition d’un enfant à un traitement médical. Lecas de Philippe. Ethics in Medical Practice, 3, 1-3, 5.43. Baylis, F. (1992). Bill 109, an Act of respecting consent to treatment. Calyx: Ethical Issues inPaediatrics, 2, 1-2.44. Baylis, F., & Downie, J. (1991). The nature of medical ethics. Westminster Affairs, 4, 11-12.45. Baylis, F., & Downie, J. (1991). The new Canadian law on abortion. Westminster Affairs, 4, 10.46. Baylis, F. (1989). Abortion: Recent Canadian history. Westminster Affairs, 2, 1-2.47. Baylis, F. (1988). RU-486 update. Westminster Affairs, 2(1), 5.48. Baylis, F. (1988). R. v. Morgentaler, S.C.C., Jan.28,1988 [Unreported]. Westminster Affairs, 1, 5-6.49. Baylis, F. (1988). What is RU-486? Westminster Affairs, 1, 4.LETTERS TO THE EDITOR1. Macklin, R., Shepherd, L., Dreger, A., & 42 others (including Baylis, F.) (2013). The OHRP andSUPPORT – Another View. [Letter to the Editor] NEJM June 26, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1308015.http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1308015.2. Jones D., Baylis F., McCormick R., Kollek R. & Lopéz-Moratalla N. (2013). Alarm over genetic controlof embryos. March 20 [Letter to the Editor] The Times (London, UK).3. Baylis, F. (2012) Enforcing the Assisted Human Reproduction Act. [Letter to the Editor] Journal ofObstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 34(5): 415.4. Baylis, F. & Kaposy, C. (2011) Ideal ethical standards for contraceptive use in research. [Letter to theEditor] IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 33(2), 19-20.5. Baylis, F., & Ram, N. (2006). Eligibility of cryopreserved human embryos for stem cell research inCanada the importance of empirical research in bioethics: The case of human embryo stem cellFrançoise Baylis, Page 19
Page 3 and 4: Dog Judge: Mrs Rosemary KiddCLASSIF
Page 5: 2009-20102009-20102009-20102007-200
Page 10 and 11: 10. Baylis, F., Ireland, A., Kaufma
Page 12 and 13: 26. Baylis, F. & Fenton, A. (2007).
Page 14 and 15: 62. Baylis, F. (1997). Errors in me
Page 16 and 17: 21. Baylis, F., & Hellman, J. (2001
Page 20 and 21: esearch: in response. [Letter to th
Page 22 and 23: 17. Baylis, F. (2009, August 12). A
Page 24 and 25: Neuroenhancement: Psychopharmacolog
Page 26 and 27: Promises and Perils of Embryonic St
Page 28 and 29: Ethics and AHR in Canada: Current S
Page 30 and 31: Research/Canadian Journal of Women
Page 32 and 33: Choosing “For”, “With” or
Page 34 and 35: Baylis F. Ethical Implications of G
Page 36 and 37: Journal of Ethics in Mental Health,
Page 38 and 39: In addition to the above, while wor

Current CV - Novel Tech Ethics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?