Current CV - Novel Tech Ethics

34. Baylis, F. (2001). Brickbats and bouquets for the draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.Health Law Review, 10, 3-7.35. Laidlaw, T., Baylis, F., Downie, J., MacLeod, H., & Ludman, M. D. (2001). The inclusion of ethics, lawand communication issues in genetics education: A survey of Canadian medical schools [Specialinsert]. Canadian College of Medical Genetics Newsletter.36. Baylis, F. (2001). Canadian regulation of assisted reproductive technologies? Hastings CenterReport, 31, 8.37. Baylis, F. (2000). The Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee. Hastings Center Report, 30, 52.38. Baylis, F. (1999). Mandating research with children. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 21,10-11.39. Kenny N, & Baylis, F. (1998). Critical reflection and competent care: The ethics of practice [Invitededitorial]. Echo Newsletter, The Medical Council of Canada, 9(2) (4pp). (50% contribution)40. Baylis, F., & Weijer, C. (1997). Remembering Benjamin Freedman (1951-1997) [Invited editorial].Hastings Center Report, 27, 48.41. Baylis, F. (1997). Bioethics scholar remembered [Invited obituary]. Canadian Medical AssociationJournal, 156, 1679. Reprinted in: (2000). B. Freedman, [F. Baylis (Ed.], The Roles andResponsibilities of the Ethics Consultant: A Retrospective Analysis of Cases (p.153). Hagerstown,Md: University Publishing Group.42. Baylis, F. (1993). When a child objects to medical treatment: The case of Philip [Feature article].Ethics in Medical Practice, 3, 1-3, 5. Translated: L’opposition d’un enfant à un traitement médical. Lecas de Philippe. Ethics in Medical Practice, 3, 1-3, 5.43. Baylis, F. (1992). Bill 109, an Act of respecting consent to treatment. Calyx: Ethical Issues inPaediatrics, 2, 1-2.44. Baylis, F., & Downie, J. (1991). The nature of medical ethics. Westminster Affairs, 4, 11-12.45. Baylis, F., & Downie, J. (1991). The new Canadian law on abortion. Westminster Affairs, 4, 10.46. Baylis, F. (1989). Abortion: Recent Canadian history. Westminster Affairs, 2, 1-2.47. Baylis, F. (1988). RU-486 update. Westminster Affairs, 2(1), 5.48. Baylis, F. (1988). R. v. Morgentaler, S.C.C., Jan.28,1988 [Unreported]. Westminster Affairs, 1, 5-6.49. Baylis, F. (1988). What is RU-486? Westminster Affairs, 1, 4.LETTERS TO THE EDITOR1. Macklin, R., Shepherd, L., Dreger, A., & 42 others (including Baylis, F.) (2013). The OHRP andSUPPORT – Another View. [Letter to the Editor] NEJM June 26, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1308015.http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1308015.2. Jones D., Baylis F., McCormick R., Kollek R. & Lopéz-Moratalla N. (2013). Alarm over genetic controlof embryos. March 20 [Letter to the Editor] The Times (London, UK).3. Baylis, F. (2012) Enforcing the Assisted Human Reproduction Act. [Letter to the Editor] Journal ofObstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 34(5): 415.4. Baylis, F. & Kaposy, C. (2011) Ideal ethical standards for contraceptive use in research. [Letter to theEditor] IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 33(2), 19-20.5. Baylis, F., & Ram, N. (2006). Eligibility of cryopreserved human embryos for stem cell research inCanada the importance of empirical research in bioethics: The case of human embryo stem cellFrançoise Baylis, Page 19