WOODROW WILSON <strong>IN</strong>TERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARSLEE H. HAMILTON, PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORBOARD OF TRUSTEESJoseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair; David A. Metzner, Vice Chair. Public Members: James H. Billington,Librarian of Congress; John W. Carlin, Archivist of the United States; Bruce Cole, Chair, NationalEndowment for the Humanities; Roderick R. Paige, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education;Colin L. Powell, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; Lawrence M. Small, Secretary,Smithsonian Institution; Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and HumanServices. Private Citizen Members: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., Carol Cartwright, Donald E. Garcia, BruceS. Gelb, Daniel L. Lamaute, Tamala L. Longaberger, Thomas R. ReedyWILSON COUNCILBruce S. Gelb, President. Elias F. Aburdene, Charles S. Ackerman, B.B. Andersen, Russell Anmuth,Cyrus A. Ansary, Lawrence E. Bathgate II, Theresa Behrendt, John Beinecke, Joseph C. Bell, StevenAlan Bennett, Rudy Boschwitz, A. Oakley Brooks, Donald A. Brown, Melva Bucksbaum, Richard I.Burnham, Nicola L. Caiola, Mark Chandler, Peter B. Clark, Melvin Cohen, William T. Coleman, Jr.,David M. Crawford, Jr., Michael D. DiGiacomo, Beth Dozoretz, Elizabeth Dubin, F. Samuel Eberts III,I. Steven Edelson, Mark Epstein, Melvyn J. Estrin, Sim Farar, Susan R. Farber, Roger Felberbaum,Julie Finley, Joseph H. Flom, John H. Foster, Charles Fox, Barbara Hackman Franklin, NormanFreidkin, John H. French, II, Morton Funger, Gregory M. Gallo, Chris G. Gardiner, Gordon D. Giffin,Steven J. Gilbert, Alma Gildenhorn, David F. Girard-diCarlo, Michael B. Goldberg, Roy M. Goodman,Gretchen Meister Gorog, William E. Grayson, Ronald Greenberg, Raymond A. Guenter, Cheryl F.Halpern, Edward L. Hardin, Jr., John L. Howard, Darrell E. Issa, Jerry Jasinowski, Brenda LaGrangeJohnson, Shelly Kamins, James M. Kaufman, Edward W. Kelley, Jr., Anastasia D. Kelly, ChristopherJ. Kennan, Willem Kooyker, Steven Kotler, William H. Kremer, Raymond Learsy, Dennis A. LeVett,Francine Gordon Levinson, Harold O. Levy, Frederic V. Malek, David S. Mandel, John P. Manning,Jeffrey A. Marcus, John Mason, Jay Mazur, Robert McCarthy, Linda McCausland, Stephen G.McConahey, Donald F. McLellan, Charles McVean, J. Kenneth Menges, Jr., Kathryn Mosbacher,Jeremiah L. Murphy, Martha T. Muse, John E. Osborn, Paul Hae Park, Gerald L. Parsky, Jeanne L.Phillips, Michael J. Polenske, Donald Robert Quartel, Jr., J. John L. Richardson, Margaret MilnerRichardson, Larry D. Richman, Carlyn Ring, Edwin Robbins, Robert G. Rogers, Otto Ruesch, Juan A.Sabater, Alan M. Schwartz, Timothy R. Scully, J. Michael Shepherd, George P. Shultz, Raja W.Sidawi, Kenneth Siegel, Ron Silver, William A. Slaughter, James H. Small, Shawn Smeallie, GordonV. Smith, Thomas F. Stephenson, Norman Kline Tiefel, Mark C. Treanor, Anthony G. Viscogliosi,Christine M. Warnke, Ruth Westheimer, Pete Wilson, Deborah Wince-Smith, Herbert S. Winokur, Jr.,Paul Martin Wolff, Joseph Zappala, Richard S. Ziman, Nancy M. ZirkinABOUT THE CENTERThe Center is the living memorial of the United States of America to the nation’s twenty-eighthpresident, Woodrow Wilson. Congress established the Woodrow Wilson Center in 1968 as aninternational institute for advanced study, “symbolizing and strengthening the fruitful relationshipbetween the world of learning and the world of public affairs.” The Center opened in 1970under its own board of trustees.In all its activities the Woodrow Wilson Center is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, supportedfinancially by annual appropriations from Congress, and by the contributions of foundations,corporations, and individuals. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publicationsand programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that providefinancial support to the Center.
TABLE OF CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTSVII<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION 1CHAPTER ONE 7A Demographic and Social Portrait of NontraditionalImmigrants in KyivCHAPTER TWO 35Living Conditions of Nontraditional Immigrants in KyivCHAPTER THREE 83The Socio-Cultural Integration of ImmigrantsCHAPTER FOUR 107Losses and Gains, Intentions and ProspectsCHAPTER FIVE 119Immigrants through the Eyes of Kyiv ResidentsCHAPTER SIX 143Joining the World:Why Kyiv’s Migrant CommunitiesMatterAPPENDIX 161NOTES 167CONTRIBUTORS 179| v |
- Page 1 and 2: Comparative Urban Studies ProjectNO
- Page 3: KENNAN INSTITUTENONTRADITIONALIMMIG
- Page 7 and 8: INTRODUCTIONIn August 2004, Serhiy
- Page 9 and 10: IntroductionBecause many of the non
- Page 11 and 12: Introductiondo vyboriv, conducted b
- Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER ONEA Demographic and Social
- Page 15 and 16: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 17 and 18: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 19 and 20: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 21 and 22: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 23 and 24: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 25 and 26: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 27 and 28: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 29 and 30: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 31 and 32: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 33 and 34: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 35 and 36: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 37 and 38: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 39 and 40: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 41 and 42: ers recorded in passports). African
- Page 43 and 44: etween 1991 and 1998 had a residenc
- Page 45 and 46: and universities, i.e., they had th
- Page 47 and 48: approved by a Kyiv Municipal Counci
- Page 49 and 50: papers, as with marriage registrati
- Page 51 and 52: Without a doubt the economic situat
- Page 53 and 54: TABLE 2.3 Distribution of Economica
- Page 55 and 56:
in manufacturing. Finding a permane
- Page 57 and 58:
espondents from Vietnam are private
- Page 59 and 60:
ution of goods and services not ava
- Page 61 and 62:
who were more willing to discuss th
- Page 63 and 64:
TABLE 2.8 Distribution of Economica
- Page 65 and 66:
given by Africans; Afghans also gav
- Page 67 and 68:
were given by immigrants from Pakis
- Page 69 and 70:
conclusion is true only for a certa
- Page 71 and 72:
The largest group of immigrant hous
- Page 73 and 74:
Surveyed immigrant households are d
- Page 75 and 76:
tion than some oblast capitals of U
- Page 77 and 78:
As a rule, children who attend Ukra
- Page 79 and 80:
As stated earlier, children from 28
- Page 81 and 82:
Residence permit - - - - - 100.0 10
- Page 83 and 84:
Some heads of immigrant households
- Page 85 and 86:
every five respondents does not hav
- Page 87 and 88:
est. Often several unrelated indivi
- Page 89 and 90:
Kyiv chose to stay beyond the compl
- Page 91 and 92:
difference between opportunities an
- Page 93 and 94:
significant difference within indiv
- Page 95 and 96:
olds: only 20% associate with the l
- Page 97 and 98:
may be entirely placed on the women
- Page 99 and 100:
Communication Contact IndicatorsThe
- Page 101 and 102:
Cultural integration is characteriz
- Page 103 and 104:
the assimilation strategy.The main
- Page 105 and 106:
Immigrants from African countries a
- Page 107 and 108:
are very limited in Kyiv. No one fo
- Page 109 and 110:
To a great extent joint participati
- Page 111 and 112:
| 106 |
- Page 113 and 114:
* The total percentage exceeds 100
- Page 115 and 116:
Among representatives of immigrant
- Page 117 and 118:
TABLE 4.2 Distribution of Responden
- Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 4.3 Distribution of Immigrant
- Page 121 and 122:
Table 4.4 illustrates the aspiratio
- Page 123 and 124:
sion of the Schengen zone. In other
- Page 125 and 126:
ferent attitude of the local popula
- Page 127 and 128:
The survey addressed the following
- Page 129 and 130:
Shevchenkivsky districts (15% each)
- Page 131 and 132:
However, it can also be said that t
- Page 133 and 134:
you?” nearly 62% of immigrants me
- Page 135 and 136:
more negative than positive consequ
- Page 137 and 138:
well as those who have their own bu
- Page 139 and 140:
the same time, sufficiently self-cr
- Page 141 and 142:
said that the number had not change
- Page 143 and 144:
impact, and brought up various argu
- Page 145 and 146:
One-third of the experts, mostly go
- Page 147 and 148:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 149 and 150:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 151 and 152:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 153 and 154:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 155 and 156:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 157 and 158:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 159 and 160:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 161 and 162:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 163 and 164:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 165 and 166:
esentative sampling of households i
- Page 167 and 168:
to meet with the researchers was th
- Page 169 and 170:
NOTES1. Serhiy Brytchenko,“Ukrain
- Page 171 and 172:
Notes“Mihranty z afrykans’kyh k
- Page 173 and 174:
Notes54. N. Hrynchuk,“Problema bi
- Page 175 and 176:
Notesfor the German Historical Inst
- Page 177 and 178:
NotesLayton-Henry, B.A. Robertson,
- Page 179 and 180:
Notes135. David Cesarani and Mary F
- Page 181 and 182:
CONTRIBUTORSOLENA BRAICHEVSKA is cu
- Page 183 and 184:
Contributorsthe History Department