Living Conditions of Nontraditional Immigrants in KyivThirty percent of immigrants paid for medical services; nearly 70% ofPakistanis paid for medical services, as did 50% of immigrants fromMiddle Eastern countries, and 40% of Vietnamese.Given that most medical services require payment, access to medicalhelp is quite restricted to a certain proportion of immigrants, primarilyrefugees and asylum seekers who do not have documents issued by thegovernment, nor funds to pay for private medical care. The UNHCROffice in Ukraine provides some assistance in resolving this problem.Pursuant to the agreement signed between this organization and thedepartmental hospital for oil and gas industry employees in Ukraine,beginning in 1995 immigrants have been receiving medical assistancebased on a referral from the UNHCR Reception Center. In 2001 alonenearly 3,000 refugees and asylum seekers visited this hospital. Emergencyintervention and treatment in specialized clinics are financed, whenevernecessary. Children are vaccinated against diphtheria. Within the frameworkof “Women’s Health” program, clinical examinations of refugeewomen are provided by the Kyiv Gynecological Center. Respondents andmembers of their families obtained medical assistance paid by charitableorganizations in 13% of all cases.These were individuals who would otherwisebe entirely deprived of access to medical care.Another possible way for immigrants to obtain medical services, likemost public services, turned out to be visits to “their own” doctors, whoat the present time are generally engaged in trading at the market. Forexample, the Afghani community has its own male doctor and femaledoctor, the latter treating women.The doctor “receives” his or her patientsat the bazaar stall, where s/he prescribes medication, gives massages, andreceives payment.The patients are satisfied.There is no need to waste timeand money searching for medical assistance. “Their own” doctor has agood grasp of their problems and can always provide help, if not throughtreatment, then at least with advice. Nevertheless, in more complicatedmedical cases this kind of care would not be sufficient.HOUS<strong>IN</strong>GInformation collected during the study revealed that although immigrants’income on average is somewhat higher than that of Kyiv residents,their access to many consumer goods and services, including essentialones, such as education and medical services, is limited. However, this| 63 |
conclusion is true only for a certain proportion of surveyed immigrants,since property diversification and, correspondingly, the difference in consumptionwithin their milieu is a rather pronounced phenomenon.Our data shows that immigrants in the city of Kyiv live mostly in standard,multi-family apartment buildings equipped with standard conveniences.Over 80% of households live in apartments with telephone service.Today,the overwhelming majority of immigrants rent units from residentswho live in the city of Kyiv or the suburbs.This accounts for nearly70% of all immigrants. Of this number, 55% rent apartments, 15% rentrooms or “corners” of rooms, i.e., they share a room with the landlords ofthe apartment (Table 2.10).No one has government housing; 8.7% of households live in dormitories.Theseare either former students who by agreement with dormitoryadministrations continue to avail themselves of this type of housing; individualswho are married to Ukrainian citizens and were provided withdormitory accommodations through their jobs; or foreign workers, mostlyChinese, whose employers have provided housing dormitories.Thirtythreerespondents (14.3%) live in housing owned by their Ukrainian wives.Only 3%, mostly Afghanis, continue to live with relatives.According to respondents, 3.9%, or nine individuals, purchased housingwith their own money earned in Ukraine.These are citizens of Vietnam andcountries of the Middle East, two Afghans, and one Pakistani. Six of theseindividuals are businessmen; the others are highly paid employees of privatecompanies. However, the purchased apartments are quite modest: two areone-room apartments, six have two rooms, and only one has three rooms.Finally, two of the respondents turned out to be individuals without adesignated place of residence: one is a disabled war veteran whoseUkrainian citizen wife left him and disappeared, and the other is a bankruptIndian trader.Immigrants’ housing accommodations are small. Only a few householdslive in two- or three-room apartments: 23.5% and 7%, respectively.Ukrainian-born wives of immigrants own one in every five two-roomapartments and half of three-room apartments. Sixty-eight percent ofapartments rented by immigrants from local residents are one-room apartments.Only 27% are two-room apartments, and nearly 6% are threeroomapartments. Almost all renters of three-room apartments are entrepreneursand employees of private companies.| 64 |
- Page 1 and 2:
Comparative Urban Studies ProjectNO
- Page 3 and 4:
KENNAN INSTITUTENONTRADITIONALIMMIG
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTSVI
- Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTIONIn August 2004, Serhiy
- Page 9 and 10:
IntroductionBecause many of the non
- Page 11 and 12:
Introductiondo vyboriv, conducted b
- Page 13 and 14:
CHAPTER ONEA Demographic and Social
- Page 15 and 16:
A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 17 and 18: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 19 and 20: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 21 and 22: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 23 and 24: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 25 and 26: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 27 and 28: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 29 and 30: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 31 and 32: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 33 and 34: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 35 and 36: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 37 and 38: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 39 and 40: A Demographic and Social Portrait o
- Page 41 and 42: ers recorded in passports). African
- Page 43 and 44: etween 1991 and 1998 had a residenc
- Page 45 and 46: and universities, i.e., they had th
- Page 47 and 48: approved by a Kyiv Municipal Counci
- Page 49 and 50: papers, as with marriage registrati
- Page 51 and 52: Without a doubt the economic situat
- Page 53 and 54: TABLE 2.3 Distribution of Economica
- Page 55 and 56: in manufacturing. Finding a permane
- Page 57 and 58: espondents from Vietnam are private
- Page 59 and 60: ution of goods and services not ava
- Page 61 and 62: who were more willing to discuss th
- Page 63 and 64: TABLE 2.8 Distribution of Economica
- Page 65 and 66: given by Africans; Afghans also gav
- Page 67: were given by immigrants from Pakis
- Page 71 and 72: The largest group of immigrant hous
- Page 73 and 74: Surveyed immigrant households are d
- Page 75 and 76: tion than some oblast capitals of U
- Page 77 and 78: As a rule, children who attend Ukra
- Page 79 and 80: As stated earlier, children from 28
- Page 81 and 82: Residence permit - - - - - 100.0 10
- Page 83 and 84: Some heads of immigrant households
- Page 85 and 86: every five respondents does not hav
- Page 87 and 88: est. Often several unrelated indivi
- Page 89 and 90: Kyiv chose to stay beyond the compl
- Page 91 and 92: difference between opportunities an
- Page 93 and 94: significant difference within indiv
- Page 95 and 96: olds: only 20% associate with the l
- Page 97 and 98: may be entirely placed on the women
- Page 99 and 100: Communication Contact IndicatorsThe
- Page 101 and 102: Cultural integration is characteriz
- Page 103 and 104: the assimilation strategy.The main
- Page 105 and 106: Immigrants from African countries a
- Page 107 and 108: are very limited in Kyiv. No one fo
- Page 109 and 110: To a great extent joint participati
- Page 111 and 112: | 106 |
- Page 113 and 114: * The total percentage exceeds 100
- Page 115 and 116: Among representatives of immigrant
- Page 117 and 118: TABLE 4.2 Distribution of Responden
- Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 4.3 Distribution of Immigrant
- Page 121 and 122:
Table 4.4 illustrates the aspiratio
- Page 123 and 124:
sion of the Schengen zone. In other
- Page 125 and 126:
ferent attitude of the local popula
- Page 127 and 128:
The survey addressed the following
- Page 129 and 130:
Shevchenkivsky districts (15% each)
- Page 131 and 132:
However, it can also be said that t
- Page 133 and 134:
you?” nearly 62% of immigrants me
- Page 135 and 136:
more negative than positive consequ
- Page 137 and 138:
well as those who have their own bu
- Page 139 and 140:
the same time, sufficiently self-cr
- Page 141 and 142:
said that the number had not change
- Page 143 and 144:
impact, and brought up various argu
- Page 145 and 146:
One-third of the experts, mostly go
- Page 147 and 148:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 149 and 150:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 151 and 152:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 153 and 154:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 155 and 156:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 157 and 158:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 159 and 160:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 161 and 162:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 163 and 164:
Joining the World: Why Kyiv’s Mig
- Page 165 and 166:
esentative sampling of households i
- Page 167 and 168:
to meet with the researchers was th
- Page 169 and 170:
NOTES1. Serhiy Brytchenko,“Ukrain
- Page 171 and 172:
Notes“Mihranty z afrykans’kyh k
- Page 173 and 174:
Notes54. N. Hrynchuk,“Problema bi
- Page 175 and 176:
Notesfor the German Historical Inst
- Page 177 and 178:
NotesLayton-Henry, B.A. Robertson,
- Page 179 and 180:
Notes135. David Cesarani and Mary F
- Page 181 and 182:
CONTRIBUTORSOLENA BRAICHEVSKA is cu
- Page 183 and 184:
Contributorsthe History Department