<strong>Yorke</strong>, <strong>Rupert</strong>Learning Log Assignment 4 - Survey <strong>of</strong> the treatment <strong>of</strong> British newsin the media <strong>of</strong> the student’s host countryWhilst forever conscious <strong>of</strong> over-generalizing <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering a rudimentary conclusion to a relativelycomprehensive question, I can safely report that the coverage <strong>of</strong> British news in American media,nationwide, is virtually non-existent. Such a statement could easily be prone to excessive hyperbole,but British affairs <strong>and</strong> developments are seldom covered by the self-obsessed, insular leviathan thatis the US media. Such an approach was actually not much <strong>of</strong> a surprise when I arrived out here – Ihad previously gathered that American reporting tends to be characterized by an incredible degree<strong>of</strong> self-centeredness <strong>and</strong> constant harking back to how America is directly affected. The newswebsites online such as the ‘objective’ CNN site would possibly provide the best (if veryrudimentary) British news stories, but these will be strictly limited to monumental political oreconomic developments such as the election <strong>of</strong> a new Prime Minister or government sc<strong>and</strong>al 8 . Theywould certainly examine isolated events <strong>and</strong> rarely address on-going social issues. The impressiverange <strong>of</strong> daily newspapers will similarly neglect to report exclusively British news, instead opting toclump us together with the rest <strong>of</strong> Europe <strong>and</strong> remind Americans <strong>of</strong> the general distrust <strong>and</strong>antipathy for European affairs. American TV is notoriously poor, comprising either American sports 9 ,inane chat shows, or lengthy news programmes – the latter <strong>of</strong> which only approaches anythingBritish when the Royal family seem to be attracting headline news. Americans seem obsessed withour monarchy <strong>and</strong> its individuals – when the announcement <strong>of</strong> Prince William’s engagement to KateMiddleton emerged, our quaint isl<strong>and</strong> was at last granted a few precious <strong>and</strong> saturated minutes <strong>of</strong>national televised coverage.In terms <strong>of</strong> my experience <strong>of</strong> American media, I try <strong>and</strong> purchase a daily broadsheet every other daycombined with listening to NPR (National Public Radio) online every morning, providing I wake up intime. USA Today <strong>and</strong> The Washington Post are supposedly pretty impartial, objective newspaperswhich report on mostly national <strong>and</strong> federal issues, along with no more than one or two doublepages <strong>of</strong> international news. The recent political unrest in the Middle East was reported in quitesome detail, yet in a recurring theme in American journalism, the nuances <strong>of</strong> the developments arealways linked back to the varying connotations for the US – speculation as to how much aid theObama administration should be preparing or whether or not every US citizen is safe <strong>and</strong> out <strong>of</strong> theregion. NPR is extremely informative <strong>of</strong> US news, but will only delve into international issues ifAmerica is directly involved. This is testament to the still very much active element <strong>of</strong> isolationism inAmerican culture – news about their own culture comes before anything else.In a further reflection on American media in general, it cannot be disputed that the st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> theirreporting <strong>and</strong> worldwide coverage (when it involves them) is first-class. Despite the chronicinsularity <strong>and</strong> quasi-jingoistic tone, both local <strong>and</strong> national newspapers are <strong>of</strong> an extremely highquality in terms <strong>of</strong> reporting <strong>and</strong> opinions. The more liberal New York Times seems to garner mostrespect <strong>and</strong> following amongst young students at William & Mary, but students in general seem torefrain from purchasing a daily paper, relying on Internet-based sources instead. However, the8 I have read next to nothing concerning how the David Cameron-led coalition government is settling in togoverning the UK.9 British, <strong>and</strong> indeed European sports, are seldom ever reported in the states.
<strong>Yorke</strong>, <strong>Rupert</strong>various columnists, such as The Washington Post’s Harold Meyerson, will consistently promulgatetheir unwavering dogmatism that the world continues to revolve around the USA. During thecatastrophic Japanese earthquake disaster, Meyerson was all too quick to reflect on what Americacan take from the disaster – his March 16 th column asked “Our Lisbon moment? What Japan’sdevastation teaches us?” 10 . In a nation where freedom <strong>of</strong> speech is so cradled <strong>and</strong> enshrined in theinerrant Constitution, it appears that Americans can write on absolutely anything they wish, safelyprotected by their extant founding documents.It therefore remains to be asked how the lack <strong>of</strong> British affairs reported in US media reflects on ourposition in the twenty-first century, at least from an American point <strong>of</strong> view. Despite this neglect foraffairs en Bretagne, it does appear that Britain in fact receives far more favourable reporting thanmost other European countries. Through a combination <strong>of</strong> our intertwined historical connections,the “special relationship” accentuated through the close alliance between Tony Blair 11 <strong>and</strong> GeorgeW. Bush during the Iraq/Afghanistan wars <strong>and</strong> a general affection for each other’s cultures, Britain<strong>and</strong> America do indeed enjoy a unique relationship which is manifested in daily interactions here inVirginia. Being British is a source <strong>of</strong> extreme pride <strong>and</strong> satisfaction. Americans bizarrely value ouridiosyncrasies <strong>and</strong> eccentricities hugely <strong>and</strong> view our culture <strong>and</strong> our comparably rich history withconsiderable envy. This appears to be in stark contrast to Germany’s modern opinion <strong>of</strong> the Brits asarrogant <strong>and</strong> supercilious – this however must similarly be tainted by historical vicissitudes too.Americans have considerable respect <strong>and</strong> admiration for the Brits, justified by the extent to which somany are desperate to visit London at some point in the future. Nevertheless, despite this affinitybetween our two cultures, they still neglect to report our news to any substantial degreewhatsoever.It is with a fair degree <strong>of</strong> reluctance <strong>and</strong> hesitance when I therefore inform Americans that US affairs<strong>and</strong> the Obama administration in particular is followed closely <strong>and</strong> reported almost daily back in theUK. Perhaps we must accept that the ramifications <strong>of</strong> American socio-political movements are(regrettably) far greater than those <strong>of</strong> twenty-first century Britain. Or perhaps they are just toowound up in their own elevated spirit <strong>of</strong> die-hard patriotism. Either way, the BBC website providesan incredibly satisfying escape from the Americanization that my eyes have endured in recentmonths – I do not feel cut <strong>of</strong>f from home at all when I can’t help but read how Kate Middleton’scatwalk dress fetched £65,000 at a recent auction – lets just hope her marriage to the future King <strong>of</strong>Engl<strong>and</strong> can at least receive 60 seconds or so before Glenn Beck gets going.10 The Washington Post, March 16 th 2011, p. 21.11 Tony Blair has done us the great favour <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>ing the UK with the not so humiliating “lap dog <strong>of</strong> America”tag.