11.07.2015 Views

micro-oxygenation in contemporary winemaking - Cape Wine ...

micro-oxygenation in contemporary winemaking - Cape Wine ...

micro-oxygenation in contemporary winemaking - Cape Wine ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Micro-<strong>oxygenation</strong> <strong>in</strong> Contemporary W<strong>in</strong>emak<strong>in</strong>gneeds to be based on current best practice and tast<strong>in</strong>g panels need to be properlyconstituted and analysed correctly. Another significant problem <strong>in</strong> these studies is thetim<strong>in</strong>g of when the endpo<strong>in</strong>ts are evaluated. Significant differences that are foundimmediately after the <strong>micro</strong>-<strong>oxygenation</strong> treatment may not persist after subsequentoenological manipulation and maturation which means, <strong>in</strong> fact, that that impact of thetreatment on the f<strong>in</strong>al product delivered to the consumer is negligible.7.3 DESCRIPTION OF IDENTIFIED STUDIESThe key characteristics of the 19 English language scientific evaluations of <strong>micro</strong><strong>oxygenation</strong>I identified are summarised <strong>in</strong> Table 18. All of these studies were published <strong>in</strong>the last decade and there is clearly a rapidly grow<strong>in</strong>g literature on the subject s<strong>in</strong>ce morethan half of the articles were published <strong>in</strong> the last two years.A wide range of different grape varietals were used <strong>in</strong> the trials and this is certa<strong>in</strong> to<strong>in</strong>fluence the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed (Pérez-Magariño et al., 2009). It is encourag<strong>in</strong>g that two ofthe papers (du Toit et al., 2006a; de Beer et al., 2008) are from South African researchersus<strong>in</strong>g local varietals. All of the study designs <strong>in</strong>cluded a control w<strong>in</strong>e for comparison thoughthe nature of that control differed between studies. Earlier research tended to compareMOX-treated w<strong>in</strong>es aga<strong>in</strong>st untreated controls whereas the more recent <strong>in</strong>vestigationshave used more realistic comparison groups.The tim<strong>in</strong>g, dose and duration of <strong>micro</strong>-<strong>oxygenation</strong> employed was quite variable. Anumber of the <strong>in</strong>itial studies <strong>in</strong>vestigated MOX treatment after malolactic fermentation (postMLF) whereas, <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g with current practice, later <strong>in</strong>vestigations have used pre-MLFMOX, or treatments both before and after malolactic fermentation. Aga<strong>in</strong>, this variationmakes it extremely difficult to compare the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of different studies.The vast majority of the identified studies focused on changes <strong>in</strong> colour and phenoliccomposition of treated w<strong>in</strong>es. There are only three reported studies which have<strong>in</strong>vestigated the effect on aroma compounds, three which measured w<strong>in</strong>e anti-oxidantstatus, and only one which has evaluated the impact on <strong>micro</strong>biological stability with anyrigour (Table 18). At present <strong>in</strong> the literature there are only five studies which havescientifically evaluated the impact of MOX us<strong>in</strong>g sensory panels. Most of the reportedstudies did have replicates and undertook some statistical analyses although this wasusually fairly limited.60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!