Farms for the Future: Massachusetts - American Farmland Trust

CHAPTER FIVERecommendationsAgricultural Preservation Restriction ProgramTo protect 20 percent of the Commonwealth’s land in farms by 2020 will require anincreased investment of $25–$30 million annually. A yearly investment of $15 millionis needed simply to keep pace with historic protection rates.Less than 12 percent of Massachusetts’ land in farms is permanently protected, yet the amountof land enrolled annually through the APR program has been declining as the cost of protectingit has been rising. While land values may be leveling off, an increase in current spending, to$15 million annually, will be required just to keep pace with the program’s historic average of2,300 acres protected per year. With a population of aging farmers and non-farming landownersretiring and relocating, farmland in Massachusetts is especially vulnerable to development as itpasses from one generation to the next. An aggressive goal of permanently protecting a total of20 percent of the Commonwealth’s farmland by 2020 would provide new opportunities foryoung and beginning farmers, spur additional investments in farm businesses, and help stabilize aland base that is growing in importance for local food and renewable energy production, waterfiltration and carbon sequestration.Reinvest all funds received from the federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protectionprogram in the APR program.From 2003 through 2007, the U.S. Department of Agriculture allocated over $19 million toMassachusetts through the federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program (FRPP). YetMassachusetts has used less than $9 million of that funding for the APR program. While theDepartment of Agricultural Resources (MDAR) is under no obligation to use the FRPP reimbursementfor the program, the use of this funding for other programs within the department,primarily the Farm Viability Enhancement Program (FVEP), has limited the impact of the federalprogram’s focus on permanent farmland protection efforts. The Patrick administration has madean important change in this regard, dedicating $2.6 million of the $3.6 million of the 2007 reimbursementto the APR program. An investment of the entire FRPP reimbursement—$5.7 millionin 2008 and potentially higher in future years as FRPP spending increases under the 2008Farm Bill—in addition to the yearly $13.35 million state investment as envisioned in the 2008Environmental Bond would provide the APR Program with $19 million. This would allow theprogram to improve its monitoring and enforcement of existing restrictions while aggressivelypursuing new acquisitions.Establish a process to consider changes in APR program policies.New regulations for the APR program are expected in 2009. While these regulations willprovide needed guidance on program implementation, they are not likely to address a number ofimportant program policies that impact the type and quality of applications to the program, theselection and approval process, and the continued viability of farms with land enrolled in theprogram. These policies include the program’s current cap on prices paid per acre, its eligibilitycriteria and ranking system, the local contribution requirement, and its policy with regard tohousing on protected parcels. The MDAR should establish a formal process that invites stakeholderparticipation in the review of and recommendation for changes to these and otherprogram policies.16American Farmland Trust