11.07.2015 Views

Identification of genetic markers in Sodium Antimony ... - CIMAP Staff

Identification of genetic markers in Sodium Antimony ... - CIMAP Staff

Identification of genetic markers in Sodium Antimony ... - CIMAP Staff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This article appeared <strong>in</strong> a journal published by Elsevier. The attachedcopy is furnished to the author for <strong>in</strong>ternal non-commercial researchand education use, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>struction at the authors <strong>in</strong>stitutionand shar<strong>in</strong>g with colleagues.Other uses, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g reproduction and distribution, or sell<strong>in</strong>g orlicens<strong>in</strong>g copies, or post<strong>in</strong>g to personal, <strong>in</strong>stitutional or third partywebsites are prohibited.In most cases authors are permitted to post their version <strong>of</strong> thearticle (e.g. <strong>in</strong> Word or Tex form) to their personal website or<strong>in</strong>stitutional repository. Authors requir<strong>in</strong>g further <strong>in</strong>formationregard<strong>in</strong>g Elsevier’s archiv<strong>in</strong>g and manuscript policies areencouraged to visit:http://www.elsevier.com/copyright


Author's personal copyA. Kumar et al. / Acta Tropica 110 (2009) 80–85 83Table 3Group specific AFLP <strong>markers</strong> (size <strong>in</strong> bp) <strong>of</strong> SAG sensitive and resistance stra<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> L.donovani.Primer comb<strong>in</strong>ationsSAG sensitivestra<strong>in</strong>s specificbands (bp)SAG resistantstra<strong>in</strong>s specificbands (bp)Fig. 2. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal component plot based on the AFLP data <strong>of</strong> six cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates <strong>of</strong> L.donovani (a–Dd8,b–2001,c–2039, d–2041,e–2087, f – 2093).and MseI-CAG/EcoRI-AGC were found to be important for detection<strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> SAG resistant isolates, and MseI-CAA/EcoRI-AGG,MseI-CTC/EcoRI-ACA, MseI-CTA/EcoRI-AGC, and MseI-CTG/EcoRI-AGC for SAG sensitive ones.4. DiscussionIn our earlier study, us<strong>in</strong>g six cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates <strong>of</strong> L. donovani, wehave demonstrated the differential expression and <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> PPGMseI-CAA/ECoRI-ACA 110, 240, 262, 390MseI-CAA/ECoRI-AGC 143, 215 273, 346, 352MseI-CAC/ECoRI-ACG 320MseI-CAA/EcoRI-ACT 269, 276, 346MseI-CAA/EcoRI-AGG 160, 240MseI-CAC/EcoRI-ACT 277MseI-CAC/EcoRI-AAG 174, 264, 299MseI-CAT/EcoRI-ACA 202 332, 337, 340MseI-CAT/EcoRI-AGC 179, 218MseI-CTC/EcoRI-ACA 117MseI-CAG/EcoRI-AGC 274MseI-CTA/EcoRI-ACA 250 281, 314, 366MseI-CTA/EcoRI-ACG 135, 316 198MseI-CTA/EcoRI-AGC 113MseI-CTG/EcoRI-ACA 161 202MseI-CTG/EcoRI-ACG 165 212MseI-CTG/EcoRI-AGC 378MseI-CTT/EcoRI-ACT 174 206by FACS and Western blott<strong>in</strong>g which was higher <strong>in</strong> SSG resistantisolates (Samant et al., 2007). The observation <strong>of</strong> differential expression<strong>of</strong> PPG <strong>in</strong> drug-resistant and sensitive stra<strong>in</strong>s gave an <strong>in</strong>dication<strong>of</strong> genomic variations that are responsible for drug resistance. Thedifficulty <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the understand<strong>in</strong>g related to SAG resistance<strong>of</strong> Leishmania, highlighted the need for a DNA marker system foreasy detection and diagnosis aga<strong>in</strong>st leishmaniasis. Exploration <strong>of</strong>these <strong>genetic</strong> variations could provide a way for marker identi-Table 2Unique molecular marker bands (size <strong>in</strong> bp) specific for each SAG sensitive and resistance stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> L. donovani detected through AFLP.Primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations Drug sensitive isolates Drug-resistant isolatesDd8 2001 2087 2041 2039 2093(1) MseI-CAA/ECoRI-ACA 101, 247, 370 260, 307,335 382MseI-CAA/ECoRI-ACG 261MseI-CAA/ECoRI-AGC 124, 153, 184, 284 105,109,110, 112,113,119, 345 142, 392128,129,130,131,183,223(2) MseI-CAC/EcoRI-ACA 379 114MseI-CAC/ECoRI-ACG 212 321MseI-CAC/ECoRI-AGC 347 102 276, 277 245(3) MseI-CAA/EcoRI-ACT 134, 248, 274, 319 222, 280 121, 218, 275, 317 135,242, 250MseI-CAA/EcoRI-AGG 319 227, 228, 259 119MseI-CAA/EcoRI-AAC 203 223(4) MseI-CAC/EcoRI-ACT 183, 251, 347 221 267 157, 215MseI-CAC/EcoRI-AAG 260 172, 284 288 127,141MseI-CAC/EcoRI-AAC(5) MseI-CAT/EcoRI-ACA 115, 251 333 101, 262, 304, 348 256 200 334, 339MseI-CAT/EcoRI-ACG 253, 260, 318, 319, 321 112 235, 263 259 202, 213 233MseI-CAT/EcoRI-AGC 321, 326, 334 215, 219, 307 203, 247, 336 344(6) MseI-CTC/EcoRI-ACA 165, 337 123 245, 255 211MseI-CTC/EcoRI-ACG 185 187, 311, 322 232MseI-CTC/EcoRI-AGC 190 311, 313, 321, 317, 318,321 173, 216 179, 274 213(7) MseI-CAG/EcoRI-ACA 171, 223, 242 137, 343 107, 161MseI-CAG/EcoRI-ACG 172 243MseI-CAG/EcoRI-AGC 107,164, 267 106,142,270 249(8) MseI-CTA/EcoRI-ACA 175, 277 379 123 116,310, 312 363, 364 238, 297MseI-CTA/EcoRI-ACG 112, 162 210 113,124,307, 310, 314MseI-CTA/EcoRI-AGC 378 217, 344, 367 102 262, 274, 315, 326 119(9) MseI-CTG/EcoRI-ACA 119, 179, 216, 217 210 101 162 205 207MseI-CTG/EcoRI-ACG 166, 180, 197, 379 136, 208, 228, 374 195MseI-CTG/EcoRI-AGC 112, 199, 308, 369 217 179 163, 277, 283(10) MseI-CTT/EcoRI-ACT 208 348, 349, 350, 351MseI-CTT/EcoRI-AAG 189, 205, 209, 375 140, 348, 350MseI-CTT/EcoRI-AAC 202,348,349, 350,353


Author's personal copy84 A. Kumar et al. / Acta Tropica 110 (2009) 80–85fication responsible for drug resistance which could be used fordetection and diagnosis aga<strong>in</strong>st VL. Therefore, this technique wasutilized to evaluate the polymorphism and phylo<strong>genetic</strong> relationships<strong>in</strong> SAG sensitive and resistant stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> L. donovani isolatedfrom VL patients that are be<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> our laboratory (Dubeet al., 2005; Samant et al., 2007). S<strong>in</strong>ce we have observed a differentialexpression <strong>of</strong> PPG <strong>in</strong> SAG resistant and sensitive isolates(Samant et al., 2007) it was concluded that this differential expressionmay be due to <strong>genetic</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> between these isolates. Inthis study we carried out AFLP analysis on similar six isolates tostudy the <strong>genetic</strong> variation responsible for drug resistance. Number<strong>of</strong> primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations taken for this study is also an importantissue to produce an accurate estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>genetic</strong> relatedness (Elliset al., 1997). It is believed that by choos<strong>in</strong>g at least six comb<strong>in</strong>ations<strong>of</strong> primers, it is possible to expla<strong>in</strong> the expected relatednessby more than 80% (Chen et al., 2004). We have taken here morethan 6 i.e. 10 comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> EcoRI/MseI primers <strong>in</strong> our studyfor more accuracy, reliability and dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>genetic</strong> relations<strong>in</strong> our result (Vos et al., 1995). These comb<strong>in</strong>ations yielded 20–40DNA fragments after the PCR, with<strong>in</strong> the size range <strong>of</strong> 100–400 bpthat were used to screen all the cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates. The results thusobta<strong>in</strong>ed from a large number <strong>of</strong> primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations were utilizedto check the robustness <strong>of</strong> the dendrogram and estimates <strong>of</strong> phylogenythat clearly establish the polymorphism revealed by AFLPwhich is not only abundant but also statistically reliable (Chen etal., 2004).This study supports the hypothesis that SAG resistance stra<strong>in</strong>sevolve from the sensitive ones. From dendrogram it is clear that2041 and 2093 stra<strong>in</strong> (resistant) share homology with 2087 stra<strong>in</strong>(sensitive) but their response aga<strong>in</strong>st SAG is different. It <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat due to po<strong>in</strong>t mutations, <strong>in</strong>sertions, deletions, and/or other<strong>genetic</strong> rearrangements (Vos et al., 1995) there is change <strong>in</strong> the<strong>genetic</strong> make-up <strong>of</strong> Leishmania stra<strong>in</strong> which facilitates the conversion<strong>of</strong> parasite from sensitive to resistance condition. Indeed,this study too provides evidence suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the Leishmaniapopulations orig<strong>in</strong>ated from a common ancestral species. This phylo<strong>genetic</strong>relationship among Leishmania species shows that all thel<strong>in</strong>eages <strong>in</strong> this species converge to a s<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t before separat<strong>in</strong>gfrom other related species <strong>in</strong>cluded as out-grouped. These resultsfurther ascerta<strong>in</strong> that 2039 stra<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> Leishmania is totally out-group<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that this stra<strong>in</strong> is highly polymorphic and develop resistanceaga<strong>in</strong>st SAG. The variability observed among SAG sensitiveand resistant populations based on AFLP analysis suggests that theSAG resistant stra<strong>in</strong> may be a composite group. We may say that dueto this genomic differentiation they acquire drug resistance. Further,it was evident from the component plots that the SAG resistantaccessions 2039 are remarkably dist<strong>in</strong>ct from other SAG resistantaccessions as it falls at the extremes <strong>of</strong> the plot. This further provedthe highly polymorphic nature <strong>of</strong> 2039 and correlates well to ourprevious f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> which, while us<strong>in</strong>g the same cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates,we have shown that expression <strong>of</strong> proteophosphoglycan is highlyupregulated <strong>in</strong> 2039 stra<strong>in</strong> (Samant et al., 2007).Moreover, these results demonstrate that <strong>genetic</strong> resolutionprovided by AFLP is amenable to phylo<strong>genetic</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> closelyrelated Leishmania species. The high sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the AFLPtechnique, which provides a novel and very powerful DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gtechnique for DNAs <strong>of</strong> any orig<strong>in</strong> or complexity (Vos etal., 1995), along with its rich band<strong>in</strong>g pattern (20–40 bands foreach pair <strong>of</strong> selective primers) provided more <strong>in</strong>formation aboutpolymorphisms among Leishmania cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates. A noteworthyobservation, as evident from dendrogram, was that AFLP analysis,while display<strong>in</strong>g a higher rate <strong>of</strong> polymorphisms among Leishmaniacl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates, further <strong>in</strong>dicates towards the shift<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> drugsensitive parasite to resistant condition.In conclusion, our approach us<strong>in</strong>g AFLP revealed <strong>genetic</strong> polymorphismamong the L. donovani cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates obta<strong>in</strong>ed from thepatients <strong>of</strong> endemic area and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> our laboratory. This prelim<strong>in</strong>aryexercise <strong>of</strong> AFLP f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g could be further extendedto a broad survey <strong>of</strong> populations <strong>in</strong> order to evaluate the impact <strong>of</strong>co-evolution among various stra<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> parasite. Future studies mayalso <strong>in</strong>clude molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g and recovery <strong>of</strong> AFLP marker bandsfor the identification <strong>of</strong> disease specific <strong>markers</strong> <strong>of</strong> VL. The genomicf<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>of</strong> Leishmania obta<strong>in</strong>ed from AFLP study servesas a basic framework <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> more detailed <strong>in</strong>formationon the genome and <strong>markers</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ked to genes responsible forresistance and disease.AcknowledgementsOur grateful acknowledgements are due to Directors <strong>of</strong> CDRIand <strong>CIMAP</strong>, Lucknow for provid<strong>in</strong>g the facilities to make this studypossible. F<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance to A.K. from University Grants Commission(UGC), New Delhi for Senior Research fellowship and toV.R.B. by NMITLI, Council <strong>of</strong> Scientific and Industrial Research(CSIR), New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged. This has CDRIresearch communication no. 7363.ReferencesAgbo, E.E., Majiwa, P.A., Claassen, H.J., te Pas, M.F., 2002. Molecular variation <strong>of</strong> Trypanosomabrucei subspecies as revealed by AFLP f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Parasitology 124,349–358.Carrio, J., Riera, C., Gallego, M., Ribera, E., Portus, M., 2001. In vitro susceptibility<strong>of</strong> Leishmania <strong>in</strong>fantum to meglum<strong>in</strong>e antimoniate <strong>in</strong> isolates from repeatedleishmaniasis episodes <strong>in</strong> HIV-co<strong>in</strong>fected patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47,120–121.Chen, J., Devanand, P.S., Norman, D.J., Henny, R.J., Chao, C.C., 2004. Genetic relationships<strong>of</strong> Aglaonema species and cultivars <strong>in</strong>ferred from AFLP <strong>markers</strong>. Ann. Bot.(Lond.) 93, 157–166.Decuypere, S., Rijal, S., Yardley, V., De Doncker, S., Laurent, T., Khanal, B., Chappuis,F., Dujard<strong>in</strong>, J.C., 2005. Gene expression analysis <strong>of</strong> the mechanism <strong>of</strong> naturalSb(V) resistance <strong>in</strong> Leishmania donovani isolates from Nepal. Antimicrob. AgentsChemother. 49, 4616–4621.Dube, A., S<strong>in</strong>gh, N., Sundar, S., S<strong>in</strong>gh, N., 2005. Refractor<strong>in</strong>ess to the treatment <strong>of</strong>sodium stibogluconate <strong>in</strong> Indian kala-azar field isolates persist <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong>vivo experimental models. Parasitol. Res. 96, 216–223.Ellis, R.P., McNicol, J.W., Baird, E., Booth, A., Lawrence, P., Thomas, B., Powell, W.,1997. The use <strong>of</strong> AFLPs to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>genetic</strong> relatedness <strong>in</strong> barley. Mol. Breed. 3,359–369.Felsenste<strong>in</strong>, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach us<strong>in</strong>g the bootstrap.Evolution 39, 771–783.Hadighi, R., Mohebali, M., Boucher, P., Hajjaran, H., Khamesipour, A., Ouellette, M.,2006. Unresponsiveness to Glucantime treatment <strong>in</strong> Iranian cutaneous leishmaniasisdue to drug-resistant Leishmania tropica parasites. PLoS Med. 3, e162.Hill, K.K., Ticknor, L.O., Ok<strong>in</strong>aka, R.T., Asay, M., Blair, H., Bliss, K.A., Laker, M., Pard<strong>in</strong>gton,P.E., Richardson, A.P., Tonks, M., Beecher, D.J., Kemp, J.D., Kolsto, A.B., Wong,A.C., Keim, P., Jackson, P.J., 2004. Fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphismanalysis <strong>of</strong> Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thur<strong>in</strong>giensisisolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1068–1080.Jaccard, P., 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bullet<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> SociétéVaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44, 223–270.Kelly, J.M., 1993. Isolation <strong>of</strong> DNA and RNA from Leishmania. Methods Mol. Biol. 21,123–131.Mart<strong>in</strong>elli, A., Hunt, P., Fawcett, R., Cravo, P.V., Walliker, D., Carter, R., 2005. An AFLPbased<strong>genetic</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kage map <strong>of</strong> Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi. Malar. J. 4, 11.Murray, H.W., Berman, J.D., Davies, C.R., Saravia, N.G., 2005. Advances <strong>in</strong> leishmaniasis.Lancet 366, 1561–1577.Pavlicek, A., Hrda, S., Flegr, J., 1999. Free-Tree – freeware program for construction <strong>of</strong>phylo<strong>genetic</strong> trees on the basis <strong>of</strong> distance data and bootstrap/jackknife analysis<strong>of</strong> the tree robustness. Application <strong>in</strong> the RAPD analysis <strong>of</strong> genus Frenkelia. FoliaBiol. (Praha.) 45, 97–99.Ravel, S., Monteny, N., Velasco Olmos, D., Escalante Verdugo, J., Cuny, G., 2001. Aprelim<strong>in</strong>ary study <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>genetic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)from Mexico us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite and AFLP <strong>markers</strong>. Acta Trop. 78, 241–250.Rojas, R., Valderrama, L., Valderrama, M., Varona, M.X., Ouellette, M., Saravia, N.G.,2006. Resistance to antimony and treatment failure <strong>in</strong> human Leishmania viannia<strong>in</strong>fection. J. Infect. Dis. 193, 1375–1383.Samant, M., Sahasrabuddhe, A.A., S<strong>in</strong>gh, N., Gupta, S.K., Sundar, S., Dube, A., 2007. Proteophosphoglycanis differentially expressed <strong>in</strong> sodium stibogluconate-sensitiveand resistant Indian cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates <strong>of</strong> Leishmania donovani. Parasitology 134,1175–1184.S<strong>in</strong>gh, N., S<strong>in</strong>gh, R.T., Sundar, S., 2003. Novel mechanism <strong>of</strong> drug resistance <strong>in</strong> kalaazarfield isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 188, 600–607.Sundar, S., More, D.K., S<strong>in</strong>gh, M.K., S<strong>in</strong>gh, V.P., Sharma, S., Makharia, A., Kumar, P.C.,Murray, H.W., 2000. Failure <strong>of</strong> pentavalent antimony <strong>in</strong> visceral leishmaniasis


Author's personal copyA. Kumar et al. / Acta Tropica 110 (2009) 80–85 85<strong>in</strong> India: report from the center <strong>of</strong> the Indian epidemic. Cl<strong>in</strong>. Infect. Dis. 31,1104–1107.Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A.,Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M., Zabeau, M., 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNAf<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4407–4414.Yap, I.V., Nelson, R.J., 1996. W<strong>in</strong>boot: a program for perform<strong>in</strong>g bootstrap analysis <strong>of</strong>b<strong>in</strong>ary data to determ<strong>in</strong>e the confidence limits <strong>of</strong> UPGMA-based dendrograms.IRRI Discussion Paper. Series No. 14, International Rice Research Institute, Manila,Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!