11.07.2015 Views

Where are we today with respect to girls' education

Where are we today with respect to girls' education

Where are we today with respect to girls' education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan 2002);− Make elementary <strong>education</strong> a Fundamental Right of every single child in the 6–14 agegroup (93 rd Constitutional Amendment, GOI 2002).Source: Original taken from Ramachandran 1998, revised February 2003.In addition <strong>to</strong> these national initiatives, the Education Guarantee Scheme introduced bythe Government of Madhya Pradesh made a deep impact on the way UEE wasapproached. This programme was initiated <strong>with</strong> a state-wide household survey ofchildren – called the Lok Sampark Abhiyan in 1996, an ambitious exercise inparticipa<strong>to</strong>ry rural appraisal of the state of primary <strong>education</strong> in DPEP districts (it hassince been replicated recently in 2000) 4 . It was a mammoth undertaking, a door-<strong>to</strong>-doorexercise in social mapping <strong>to</strong> ascertain the number of children bet<strong>we</strong>en the ages of 5 <strong>to</strong>15years who do not have access <strong>to</strong> schools, who <strong>are</strong> enrolled in schools, and those who <strong>are</strong>actually attending schools and <strong>to</strong> build upon the successes of the Total LiteracyCampaigns (TLC) of the early 1990s in creating/reinforcing social aw<strong>are</strong>ness regarding<strong>education</strong> and the privileged place it occupies in every individual’s life, especiallychildren 5 . The appraisal effectively highlighted the discrepancies bet<strong>we</strong>en existing dataand the ground reality, and indicated that non-enrolment remained a pressing issuealongside that of increasing dropouts (Vyasulu, 2000).Box 2: Madhya Pradesh Education Guarantee SchemeThe scheme attempts <strong>to</strong> involve communities in <strong>education</strong>al programmes and processes. If acommunity <strong>with</strong>out primary schooling facility demands a teacher, the government guarantees<strong>to</strong> provide a teacher, his salary, training and teaching-learning aids <strong>with</strong>in 90 days. Thecommunity has <strong>to</strong> enrol at least 25 children in tribal <strong>are</strong>as and 40 in non-tribal <strong>are</strong>as and alsoprovides space for teaching. It can suggest a suitable local resident as a teacher. Forty primaryschools on an average <strong>we</strong>re started on each day of the year in 1997 and one-third of them<strong>we</strong>re using open space for teaching and learning. The objective of the EGS is <strong>to</strong> mobilise thePanchayats and attempt <strong>to</strong> create better primary schools than the formal mainstream schools.A process of decentralisation and community participation in school <strong>education</strong> is believed <strong>to</strong>have been set in motion by the state.(Source: Gopala Krishnan and Amita Sharma: “A New EGS: Education Guarantee Schemein Madhya Pradesh”, Occasional Papers, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, 1998.4 ‘This set the stage for the introduction of EGS <strong>to</strong> increase access <strong>to</strong> schools while reinforcingthe decentralised vision of <strong>education</strong> planning implicit in DPEP and the innovative curriculum ofAS. The EGS <strong>we</strong>nt a step further by firmly locating itself in community demand for <strong>education</strong>,empo<strong>we</strong>ring it <strong>to</strong> “enforce the accountability of the state <strong>to</strong> universalise primary <strong>education</strong> and atthe same time sh<strong>are</strong>(s) a part of the resource requirement” (Sharma & Gopalakrishnan, 2000:3).5 The process involved is rather simple, where a settlement <strong>with</strong> a population of 40 students in theage group of 6 <strong>to</strong>14 years (the number is reduced <strong>to</strong> 25 in the case of socially marginal groups orsparsely populated <strong>are</strong>as) and no school in the radius of one kilometre, can demand a primary<strong>education</strong> facility from the state. The government has <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>with</strong> a fully functional EGSschool <strong>with</strong>in 90 days of receiving the demand. The scheme was introduced in January 1997, <strong>with</strong>the primary objective of providing minimum <strong>education</strong> facilities <strong>to</strong> socially, economically, as<strong>we</strong>ll as geographically marginal groups in the state, schools that <strong>we</strong>re sensitive <strong>to</strong> the needs oflocal communities and cost-effective <strong>with</strong>out compromising on quality.’ (Aarti Saihjee, 2002)India Case Study Page 9 20 June 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!