11.07.2015 Views

csi undergraduate conference on research, scholarship ... - CSI Today

csi undergraduate conference on research, scholarship ... - CSI Today

csi undergraduate conference on research, scholarship ... - CSI Today

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Research Paper Presentati<strong>on</strong>sSocial Scientific Methods inComparative PerspectiveRoom 222, 1:30pm–2:55pmP A P E R 1The Western Uni<strong>on</strong> TelegraphExpediti<strong>on</strong> and the Participants’Views of the Natives TheyEncounteredKelly CooperFaculty Mentor: Dr. Susan Smith-PeterDepartment of HistoryBetween 1865 and 1868 members of the WesternUni<strong>on</strong> Telegraph Expediti<strong>on</strong> encountered manynative people <strong>on</strong> their journeys through Alaska andSiberia. Historians have not given a detailed orcomplete account of the Western Uni<strong>on</strong> TelegraphExpediti<strong>on</strong>, especially the encounters between theparticipants and the natives of Siberia and Alaska.This paper tries to provide this account and examinea topic that has not been given much c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>.This paper c<strong>on</strong>centrates <strong>on</strong> the views of theexpediti<strong>on</strong> participants towards the natives theyencountered <strong>on</strong> their journeys. Based <strong>on</strong> the writtenaccounts of George Kennan, Richard Bush, andWilliam H. Dall, this paper argues that all theparticipants viewed the natives they encountered asinferior, and that this opini<strong>on</strong> was shared by thewhite American populati<strong>on</strong> at the time. Theexpediti<strong>on</strong> members’ views about the natives can bec<strong>on</strong>nected to the broader white American view thatnatives, including Native Americans, were barbarians.This paper argues that this view c<strong>on</strong>tributed to thenegative view the expediti<strong>on</strong> participants had of thenatives in Alaska and Siberia. This negative viewvaried in degree am<strong>on</strong>g the participants, but n<strong>on</strong>e ofthem found the natives to be equal. This wassurprising because most of the participants wouldhave died had the natives not been so helpful insuch terrible c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.P A P E R 2The Internati<strong>on</strong>al Committee ofthe Red Cross and the TerezinGhettoDeryn CroFaculty Mentor: Dr. Mark LewisDepartment of HistoryThe Nazis set up the Terezin ghetto in theProtectorate of Bohemia and Moravia to persuadethe outside world that Jews were being protectedwithin the Third Reich. Even after an investigati<strong>on</strong>by the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Committee of the Red Cross(ICRC), the Nazis were still able to maintain thisfaçade. This study focuses <strong>on</strong> the time between1941-1945 when Terezin was first developed, andsuspici<strong>on</strong>s regarding the Final Soluti<strong>on</strong> began toincrease. Historians have previously speculated thatthe ICRC, as a neutral organizati<strong>on</strong>, had its handstied with regards to the Holocaust. However, this<strong>research</strong> hopes to use archival evidence to showthat the ICRC not <strong>on</strong>ly had previous knowledge butalso chose to not act up<strong>on</strong> this informati<strong>on</strong>. It alsoseeks to explain why the organizati<strong>on</strong> made thedecisi<strong>on</strong>s it did. Another objective is to explainwhy the ICRC made no further inquiries aftervisiting Terezin, and the lengths the Nazis went toin order to cover up the true purpose of the “modelghetto.” This <strong>research</strong> looks to back up accusati<strong>on</strong>sthat the ICRC failed to provide properhumanitarian assistance that could have halted theNazis’ plans for exterminati<strong>on</strong>.P A P E R 3The New York City Mayoralty andPublic Opini<strong>on</strong>Kanika KhannaFaculty Mentor: Dr. Richard FlanaganDepartment of Political Science, Ec<strong>on</strong>omics andPhilosophyThe New York City Mayoralty and Public Opini<strong>on</strong>examines the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between approval ratingsand c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s/events and <strong>on</strong> the highest politicaloffice of New York City. Through a comparativestudy of the mayoral terms of Koch, Dinkins,Giuliani, and Bloomberg, I note a shift in publicpercepti<strong>on</strong> of mayoral performance regarding theec<strong>on</strong>omic state of New York City. This study utilizesboth statistical analysis of polling data andhistorical analysis of New York City’s politicalsystem. Resources used include polling data,archives, newspapers, and numerous historicalpublicati<strong>on</strong>s. From my <strong>research</strong>, I have c<strong>on</strong>cludedthat the Bloomberg mayoralty is held lessaccountable for ec<strong>on</strong>omic downturns thanprevious administrati<strong>on</strong>s; however, opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> amayor’s effectiveness during ec<strong>on</strong>omic struggle areinfluenced by the portrayal of the mayoralty’sleadership and relatability.17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!