5.8 Knowledge <strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>domsC<strong>on</strong>dom usage is <strong>on</strong>ly helpful if pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability can use it effectively. Curently <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>on</strong> correct usageof c<strong>on</strong>doms am<strong>on</strong>g pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability st<strong>and</strong>s at at 64%10989%8Percentage76543236%25%1Knowledge am<strong>on</strong>g Pers<strong>on</strong>s with Disability <strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>dom useKEYB - Knowledge of c<strong>on</strong>dom use am<strong>on</strong>g pers<strong>on</strong>s who are deaf .C - Knowledge of c<strong>on</strong>dom use am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> visually impaired.D - Lack of <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>dom use am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> physically challenged.Pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability who feel that c<strong>on</strong>dom breaks often during use 52%.The deaf who feel that c<strong>on</strong>dom breaks often during use 61%.Pers<strong>on</strong>s with physical disability who feel that c<strong>on</strong>dom breaks often during use 52%.The blind who feel that c<strong>on</strong>dom breaks often during use 43%.Those that got c<strong>on</strong>doms by purchasing 83%.Those that got c<strong>on</strong>doms through health centres 44%.People with disability who are able to negotiate for safer sex as those who used c<strong>on</strong>doms in <strong>the</strong> last sexualencounter initiated <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> or had a joint decisi<strong>on</strong> to use c<strong>on</strong>dom 84%.There are a few misc<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong>s about c<strong>on</strong>dom usage. Some girls do not trust c<strong>on</strong>doms to protect <strong>the</strong>m againstHIV virus, as <strong>the</strong>y argue c<strong>on</strong>doms have pores. Females with mild intellectual disability believe that c<strong>on</strong>doms sold inshops are recycled. Majority of blind female resp<strong>on</strong>dents also said manufacturers have compromised <strong>on</strong> quality.Although <strong>the</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>on</strong> sources of c<strong>on</strong>doms is high, it has not translated to usage of c<strong>on</strong>doms. This may beexplained by qualitative fi ndings where <strong>the</strong> youth who are deaf reported communicati<strong>on</strong> challenge when buyingc<strong>on</strong>doms since most sellers do not underst<strong>and</strong> sign language. They <strong>the</strong>refore prefer buying in a place where <strong>the</strong>ycan pick <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>doms <strong>the</strong>mselves. C<strong>on</strong>dom n<strong>on</strong> usage may be attributed to <strong>the</strong> percepti<strong>on</strong> that using c<strong>on</strong>doms in arelati<strong>on</strong>ship imply that <strong>on</strong>e does not trust <strong>the</strong> partner, c<strong>on</strong>dom reduce sexual pleasure <strong>and</strong> percepti<strong>on</strong> that c<strong>on</strong>domsare not effective in HIV preventi<strong>on</strong>, religious beliefs that discourage use of c<strong>on</strong>doms, lack of <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>on</strong> how touse c<strong>on</strong>doms <strong>and</strong> lack of c<strong>on</strong>doms at <strong>the</strong> time of need.Ability to negotiate for safer sex was established through an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of who initiated use of c<strong>on</strong>doms in <strong>the</strong>last sexual encounter.14
5.9 Percepti<strong>on</strong>sThe resp<strong>on</strong>dents were asked whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>sider people with <strong>the</strong> specifi c disability to have a higher risk ofc<strong>on</strong>tracting HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS compared to o<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong> community. Overall, 80 per cent feel <strong>the</strong>y are at riskof c<strong>on</strong>tracting HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS. Pers<strong>on</strong>s with physical disability have a lower risk by at least 15 per cent compared to<strong>the</strong> deaf <strong>and</strong> blind. Percepti<strong>on</strong> of risk was almost similar across setting (rural/urban) <strong>and</strong> gender, though slightlyhigher for women. Across <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk was perceived to be high in Mombasa at 89 per cent compared to o<strong>the</strong>rregi<strong>on</strong>s, which reported 78 per cent <strong>and</strong> below.Caregivers of pers<strong>on</strong>s with mental disability shared <strong>the</strong> same percepti<strong>on</strong> with 82 per cent feeling that a pers<strong>on</strong> withmental disability is at a higher risk of c<strong>on</strong>tracting HIV. Unlike <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r entire regi<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> of caregivers whoaccent that pers<strong>on</strong>s with mental disability is at a higher risk is lower in Nairobi at 73 per cent. Overall, <strong>the</strong> two majorfactors that put pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability at a higher risk were lack of informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS <strong>and</strong> vulnerabilityto sexual violence or sexual exploitati<strong>on</strong>. Closely related to lack of <strong>access</strong> to HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS informati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>the</strong>appropriateness of <strong>the</strong> informati<strong>on</strong>.It is interesting to note that 100 per cent of <strong>the</strong> deaf resp<strong>on</strong>se menti<strong>on</strong>ed lack of <strong>access</strong> of informati<strong>on</strong> put <strong>the</strong>m atrisk as compared to <strong>the</strong> blind (41 per cent) <strong>and</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>s with physical disability (47 per cent), this could imply that <strong>the</strong>informati<strong>on</strong> is not available <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> sign languages which <strong>the</strong>y underst<strong>and</strong>. O<strong>the</strong>r reas<strong>on</strong>s included multiple sexualpartners <strong>and</strong> lack of <strong>access</strong> to HIV preventi<strong>on</strong> programs.C<strong>on</strong>sidering those who claimed that pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability are not at risk, percepti<strong>on</strong> that pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability arediscriminated against in sexual relati<strong>on</strong>s (44 per cent) <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>y are sexually inactive (39 per cent) are <strong>the</strong> majorreas<strong>on</strong>s why <strong>the</strong>y believe that <strong>the</strong>y are not at risk. Only 24 per cent based it <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y have informati<strong>on</strong>to protect against HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS.5.10 Vulnerability of Pers<strong>on</strong>s With Disability to HIVVarious writings <strong>on</strong> disability <strong>and</strong> HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS c<strong>on</strong>cur that <strong>the</strong>re are factors that increase <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability’schances of c<strong>on</strong>tracting HIV. Some of <strong>the</strong> factors discussed include sexual violence, wife sharing, stigmatisati<strong>on</strong>,poverty, traditi<strong>on</strong>al <strong>practice</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> failure to get <strong>the</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> of choice. (Mulindwa, I.N, 2003, Groce, E. N. 2003,Munguti, K., Yousafzi, A, 2004).Sexual violence is a major predisposing factor. As discussed elsewhere, out of <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability who feltthat pers<strong>on</strong>s with similar disability are at a higher risk of c<strong>on</strong>tracting HIV than o<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong> community, 80per cent of caregivers, 70 per cent of <strong>the</strong> physically impaired, 67 per cent of pers<strong>on</strong>s with physical disability <strong>and</strong> 34per cent of <strong>the</strong> deaf attributed this percepti<strong>on</strong> to sexual violence. Eight per cent of <strong>the</strong> mentally challenged have beenraped, with females recording 15 per cent compared to 3 per cent for males. When looking at incidence of sexualviolence am<strong>on</strong>g pers<strong>on</strong>s with mental disability, cauti<strong>on</strong> should be taken because not all cases get to <strong>the</strong> attenti<strong>on</strong> of<strong>the</strong> caregiver. The caregiver in most cases gets to know <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> cases that result to pregnancy or physical harm.Seven per cent of <strong>the</strong> 410 pers<strong>on</strong>s with disability (visually impaired, pers<strong>on</strong>s who are deaf <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> physicallychallenged) who are sexually active were sexually violated in <strong>the</strong>ir fi rst sexual encounter. The incidence was higham<strong>on</strong>g female (13 per cent), blind (11 per cent) <strong>and</strong> urban (8 per cent). Although rape is affecting female more thanmale, 3 per cent male recorded that <strong>the</strong>ir fi rst sexual encounter was through rape.Seeking medical treatment after rape is important to provide rape survivors with post-exposure prophylaxis, whichcan reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of c<strong>on</strong>tracting HIV. Only 3 per cent, all of <strong>the</strong>m visually impaired, sought HIV test <strong>and</strong> preventi<strong>on</strong>.This is also compared to <strong>on</strong>e out of twelve caregivers who sought for <strong>the</strong>m medical treatment after rape. Thisindicates a huge gap in seeking medical attenti<strong>on</strong> after rape.15