Finnegans Wake - Queen Mary, University of London
Finnegans Wake - Queen Mary, University of London
Finnegans Wake - Queen Mary, University of London
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
Falling into Heidegger and Joyce: <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> and<br />
Dasein as Existential Narratives <strong>of</strong> Guilt<br />
English Abstract<br />
MICHAEL GILBERT<br />
(QUEEN MARY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, UK)<br />
This paper attempts to read James Joyce’s <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> alongside the philosopher<br />
Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time, examining similarities in order to illuminate the<br />
narratives <strong>of</strong> each text. To this end, the paper seeks to establish a broadened notion<br />
<strong>of</strong> intertextuality between the works <strong>of</strong> Heidegger and <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>. It therefore<br />
proposes a ‘<strong>Wake</strong>an hermeneutics <strong>of</strong> openness’ whereby an interpretive methodology<br />
is developed in accordance with the <strong>Wake</strong>’s proposed wish for a contract <strong>of</strong><br />
meaning with its readers. With this hermeneutical strategy it will develop a<br />
comparative reading <strong>of</strong> Joyce’s everyperson archetypes, Humphrey Chimpden<br />
Earwicker (HCE) and Anna Livia Plurabell (ALP), and Heidegger’s notion <strong>of</strong> Dasein,<br />
examining their relation to themes <strong>of</strong> guilt, fallenness, idle talk and gender. The<br />
article will suggest a similarity between Dasein and HCE, proposing that the above<br />
themes can be explored as ontological constituents <strong>of</strong> their structure. It will argue<br />
that these constituents form non-temporal narratives; in Being and Time as a solemn<br />
cultural commitment; in <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> as comical farce.<br />
German Abstract<br />
Dieser Aufsatz stellt James Joyces <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> neben Martin Heideggers Sein und<br />
Zeit und versucht, durch eine vergleichende Lektüre ein neues Licht auf beide Werke zu<br />
werfen. Zu diesem Zweck soll ein weiter gefasstes Konzept von Intertextualität zwischen den<br />
Werken Heideggers und <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> entworfen werden. Vorgeschlagen wird eine<br />
‚<strong>Wake</strong>’sche Hermeneutik der Offenheit’, mit deren Hilfe eine Verstehensweise begründet<br />
wird, die dem Wunsch in <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> nach einem ‚Sinnstiftungsvertrag’ mit den<br />
Lesern Rechnung trägt. Mit dieser hermeneutischen Strategie wird eine vergleichende Lesart<br />
von Joyces Jedermann-Archetypen, Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker (HCE) und Anna Livia<br />
Plurabell (ALP), sowie Heideggers Vorstellung von Dasein durchgeführt und ihre<br />
Beziehung zu den Konzepten Schuld, Gefallensein, Gerede und Geschlecht untersucht.<br />
Dieser Aufsatz vermutet eine Verwandtschaft zwischen Dasein und Humphrey Chimpden<br />
Earwicker und geht davon aus, dass die genannten Themen als ontologische Bestandteile<br />
ihrer Struktur wahrgenommen und erforscht werden können. Diese Bestandteile bilden<br />
zeitlose Erzählungen – die einer feierlichen kulturellen Verpflichtung in Sein und Zeit; die<br />
einer komischen Farce in <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>.<br />
I. World and Method<br />
Broadly speaking, <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> studies may be divided according to critical<br />
conceptions <strong>of</strong> language and meaning. If historical and genetic studies <strong>of</strong> Joyce <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
an invaluable tool for explication, we must guard against their tendency towards<br />
1
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
exclusivity. The <strong>Wake</strong>’s structure and thematic content also demand interpretation.<br />
The text itself, at least, perhaps suggests its hermeneutic openness,<br />
her leaves, my darling dearest, sinsinsinning since the night <strong>of</strong> time and each and all<br />
<strong>of</strong> their branches meeting and shaking twisty hands all over again in their new<br />
world through the germination <strong>of</strong> its germination from Ond’s outset to till Odd’s<br />
end. 1<br />
The pages (“leaves”) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wake</strong> reach its readers in a gesture <strong>of</strong> interpretation,<br />
“shaking twisty hands all over again in their new world.” Curiously, in a<br />
dendrological inversion, it is the “branches” <strong>of</strong> the “leaves“ that meet, suggestive<br />
perhaps <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wake</strong>’s four books interlocking with each other in their Vichian cycle,<br />
but the “new world” (my emphasis, M.G.) <strong>of</strong> this interaction is bound up with a<br />
“germination” <strong>of</strong> meaning, belying any notions <strong>of</strong> textual isolation or cyclic stability.<br />
The text, that is, is not merely internally referential but comes to have meaning in<br />
new horizons <strong>of</strong> interpretation. The world <strong>of</strong> the text is important — it provided the<br />
enabling conditions, the historical climate in which its author wrote. Indeed, we learn<br />
from the expert who advises on the interpretation <strong>of</strong> ALP’s great letter that, “to<br />
concentrate solely on the literal sense […] <strong>of</strong> any document to the sore neglect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
enveloping facts themselves circumstantiating it is […] hurtful to sound sense” (FW<br />
109). The text itself, however, is encountered in a “new world,” and the “twisty<br />
hands” <strong>of</strong> its interpretation elude any claims for perfected, linear meaning. As Hans-<br />
Georg Gadamer realised, both author and reader exist within tradition, subject to<br />
particular horizons <strong>of</strong> understanding and conditioned by particular prejudices.<br />
Sensitive interpretation occurs through a fusion <strong>of</strong> horizons [Horizontverschmelzung]<br />
whereby a reader establishes a dialectic between his own horizon and that <strong>of</strong> the<br />
text’s.<br />
Just as the events <strong>of</strong> history do not in general manifest any agreement with the<br />
subjective ideas <strong>of</strong> the person who stands and acts within history, so the sense <strong>of</strong> a<br />
text in general reaches far beyond what its author originally intended. The task <strong>of</strong><br />
understanding is concerned above all with the meaning <strong>of</strong> the text itself […]. The<br />
hermeneutical reduction to the author’s meaning is just as inappropriate as the<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> historical events to the intentions <strong>of</strong> their protagonists. 2<br />
1 James Joyce, <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> (<strong>London</strong>: Faber and Faber, 1939), 505. In the following this source will<br />
be quoted in the continuous text as FW.<br />
2 Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth & Method, trans. Weinsheimer, Joel & Marshall, Donald (<strong>London</strong>:<br />
Continuum, 2006 [1975]), 366 f.<br />
2
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
Authorial intent lays an important claim but does not exhaust textual meaning. One<br />
must allow meaning to enjoy the “germination <strong>of</strong> its germination” in new worldly<br />
horizons. Thus, <strong>Wake</strong>an interpretation is not solely archival but rather the archive<br />
supplements our evolving knowledge <strong>of</strong> the text as we encounter it in our time.<br />
Thus, as an evolving work, one must allow <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> its prophetic resonance<br />
where it appears to anticipate an event ahead <strong>of</strong> its time, or its language recalls a<br />
modern colloquial expression unknown to its author. One must further allow<br />
approaches to the text through various theoretical discourses with which Joyce<br />
would not have been familiar. As Jacques Derrida recognised, Joyce anticipates these<br />
approaches and mocks them even as they produce their critical yield. 3 The <strong>Wake</strong> must<br />
retain this challenging force; criticism is never satisfying where it moves by<br />
domestication.<br />
The danger risked, <strong>of</strong> course, by total hermeneutic openness is that interpretation<br />
is reduced to complete textual anarchy. Joyce scholars remain particularly sensitive<br />
to the allegation that <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> can mean absolutely anything. Yet this danger is<br />
avoided with the <strong>Wake</strong>an hermeneutics outlined above. The work’s pages are<br />
described as “shaking hands” with a “new world.” A contract <strong>of</strong> meaning is<br />
established. It is not at all that in thus reading the <strong>Wake</strong> ‘anything can mean<br />
anything’. Rather, it is that the strength <strong>of</strong> any possible interpretation must be<br />
ascertained by its receptive context. Literary and critical theories are now able to<br />
engage with the work if the novel’s text provides a successful thematic or syntactic<br />
context for their employment. This contextual hermeneutic provides a much needed<br />
rubric for Terry Eagleton’s humorous observation that “it is always worth testing out<br />
any literary theory by asking: How would it work with Joyce’s <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>.” 4 We<br />
are no longer in a realm where critical norms exert complete interpretive control over<br />
the text, yet we have avoided the anarchism <strong>of</strong> textual solipsism. Critical discourses<br />
3 Jacques Derrida, “Ulysses Gramophone: Hear say yes in Joyce,” trans. Shari Benstock, in James Joyce:<br />
The Augmented Ninth, eds. Bernard Benstock (New York: Syracuse <strong>University</strong> Press, 1988). Jacques<br />
Derrida, “Two Words For Joyce,” trans. Ge<strong>of</strong>f Bennington, in Post-Structuralist Joyce: Essays from the<br />
French, eds. Derek Attridge and Daniel Ferrer (Cambridge: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1984).<br />
4 Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction (Minnesota: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Minnesota Press, 2008), 71.<br />
3
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
with which Joyce was unfamiliar may be legitimately employed, provided they are<br />
carefully grounded in a sensitive consideration <strong>of</strong> the text.<br />
But can such sensitive approaches develop anything like a <strong>Wake</strong>an subject stable<br />
enough to sustain thematic exploration? Many critics reject the notion <strong>of</strong> stable<br />
narrative meaning in <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>, 5 but upon learning <strong>of</strong> the “fall <strong>of</strong> a once<br />
wallstrait oldparr” 6 being “retaled early in bed and later on down through all<br />
Christian minstrelsy” (FW 3), perhaps we find a narrative <strong>of</strong> this very instability.<br />
That is, it is the confusion surrounding the fall <strong>of</strong> Earwicker that leads to the<br />
dissolution <strong>of</strong> narrative stability, and this instability is itself incorporated into the<br />
very fall narrative it embodies. The underlying ‘story’ <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>; the<br />
seduction <strong>of</strong> HCE in the park by the young maids, the observance <strong>of</strong> this<br />
transgression by the three soldiers and the attempt by ALP to redeem her husband<br />
through an explanatory letter (delivered by Shaun; written by Shem) is an atomic<br />
theme, repeated endlessly in its many iterations. It subverts and lays claim to almost<br />
all other narratives. Within this destabilising master narrative, certain tropic elements<br />
— in particular guilt and fallenness — are explored more as ontological constituents<br />
<strong>of</strong> character than traditional thematic constructs. That is, as David Hayman observes,<br />
Joyce seems first to have located his archetypes and then to have discovered himself<br />
and his world in them. The movement was from the archetype to the contemporary,<br />
to the personal, from the eternal to the (submerged) present. 7<br />
Joyce’s everyperson archetypes provide an existential structure in terms <strong>of</strong> which the<br />
personal subject is understood. The ontological constituents <strong>of</strong> these archetypes<br />
provide a peculiar presubjective, non-temporal narrativity whereby HCE and ALP<br />
are by turn guilt ridden, subject to idle talk and redeemed in their very being. The<br />
5 Cf. (e. g.): Bernard Benstock, “Beyond Explication: The Twice Told Tales in <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>,” and<br />
Jean-Michel Rabaté, “Narratology and the Subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>,” in James Joyce: The Centennial<br />
Symposium, eds. Morris Beja, Phillip Herring, Maurice Harmon and David Norris. (Urbana and<br />
Chicago: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Illinois Press, 1986). Umberto Eco, The Aesthetics <strong>of</strong> Chaosmos — The Middle<br />
Ages Of James Joyce (Tulsa: The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tulsa, 1989 [1982]).<br />
6 ’Wallstrait’, <strong>of</strong> course, carries the resonance <strong>of</strong> Wall Street, and the Wall Street crash <strong>of</strong> 1929, being<br />
also suggestive <strong>of</strong> ’straightness’, or honest moral decency. ’Oldparr’ suggests the vernacular ’pa’, or<br />
father and also references Old Tom Parr (1483–1635), an alleged English supercentenarian accused<br />
<strong>of</strong> adultery.<br />
7 David Hayman, The “<strong>Wake</strong>” in Transit (New York: Cornell <strong>University</strong> Press, 1990) 167.<br />
4
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
subject has here fallen into language, where it evades attempts at theoretical<br />
classification. As critic Jean-Michel Rabaté notes,<br />
[w]e generally agree that any theory, while covering a certain field, also designates<br />
by its elaboration a gap, an empty space which it attempts to bridge, to fill in, to<br />
recover. In the case <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wake</strong>, however, the real object <strong>of</strong> narratology may prove to<br />
be the gap itself. 8<br />
The structure <strong>of</strong> the subject is formed around a pre-theoretical lack, or gap. The<br />
narrative subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> is not man as he is revealed by scientific theory or<br />
literary allegory. Nor is it even, as Donald Theall avers, the machinic processes upon<br />
which these theories and allegories are predicated; 9 for it is clear that these processes<br />
— correctly and skillfully identified by Theall — themselves tear apart the fixed<br />
identify <strong>of</strong> the subject and are hence a cause <strong>of</strong> its dissolution. No, the subject <strong>of</strong> the<br />
narrative <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> is something very like Martin Heidegger’s notion <strong>of</strong><br />
Dasein; the site upon which anything like a subject can show up. As Alan Roughley<br />
notes, if we “consider ALP and HCE as simulacra <strong>of</strong> what Heidegger designates as<br />
Dasein”, perhaps we will discover that a comparative reading forms a “necessary<br />
part <strong>of</strong> our ‘rocky road’ into the <strong>Wake</strong>”. 10 With a view to adumbrating this similarity I<br />
will now explore this shared site <strong>of</strong> narration — the pre-subjective structure <strong>of</strong> Being<br />
termed Dasein and the universal character archetype HCE — revealing how it is<br />
structurally bound-up with narratives <strong>of</strong> fallenness, guilt and the dangers <strong>of</strong> idle talk.<br />
8 Rabaté, “Narratology and the Subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>,” (cf. note 6), 137.<br />
9 Donald Theall, James Joyce’s Techno-Poetics (<strong>London</strong>: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Toronto Press, 1997). It falls<br />
outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this paper to consider the relationship between what Theall calls Joyce’s<br />
“techno-poetics” and Heidegger’s notion <strong>of</strong> Gestell and desire for a reawakening <strong>of</strong> the question <strong>of</strong><br />
language’s relation to Being. If Heidegger <strong>of</strong>fers us a sanctification <strong>of</strong> language, against Gestell,<br />
perhaps Joyce presents a diabolical linguistic equivocation, playfully embracing ‘techno-poetics’.<br />
10 Alan Roughley, “ALP’s ‘Sein’ und ‘Zeit’: Questions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>’s Being and Language in a<br />
Philosophical Context,“ in <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>: 50 Years, ed. Begnal & Senn (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1990),<br />
129. Margot Norris observes that when considering the theme <strong>of</strong> guilt, “interchangeability in the<br />
<strong>Wake</strong> is too easily dismissed as a stylistic flourish!” She suggests that “[i]n examining these issues,<br />
reference to the work <strong>of</strong> philosopher Martin Heidegger is particularly helpful, since Heidegger […]<br />
in his contemporary concern with the relationship <strong>of</strong> the self to others, addresses himself to the<br />
ontological aspects <strong>of</strong> guilt in relation to the dislocated self”. Margot Norris, The Decentered Universe<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> (<strong>London</strong>: The John Hopkins <strong>University</strong> Press, 1976), 74–79.<br />
5
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
II. Fallenness and Idle Talk<br />
In Being and Time, Martin Heidegger seeks to retrieve what he calls the question <strong>of</strong><br />
the meaning <strong>of</strong> Being [Sinn von Sein]. This is not a question <strong>of</strong> formal or definitional<br />
meaning [Bedeutung] but an enquiry into our everyday (pre-ontological/pre-<br />
theoretical) background sense <strong>of</strong> Being, or that which allows us to understand Being 11<br />
in general. In order to get at this meaning <strong>of</strong> Being in general, Heidegger declares<br />
that he must lay bare the existential structure <strong>of</strong> the questioner. This will allow him<br />
to interpret hermeneutically the meaning <strong>of</strong> Being from the meaning <strong>of</strong> Dasein within<br />
Being. This second announced task was never completed but the first provides the<br />
motivating force for Being and Time’s desire to excavate man’s ontic, existentiell (the<br />
particular public modality in which Dasein understands itself as dwelling — e. g.<br />
“philosopher”) structure to reveal an ontological, existential (the underlying<br />
structure upon which interpretive existentiell possibilities are predicated) ground. In<br />
laying bare these structures, philosophy <strong>of</strong>fers what Heidegger calls in Basic<br />
Questions the “immediately useless, though sovereign, knowledge <strong>of</strong> the essence <strong>of</strong><br />
things.” 12 This region <strong>of</strong> fundamental ontology is more primordial than the realms <strong>of</strong><br />
entities at stake in theoretical ontologies (such as anthropology, theology,<br />
philosophy, science), affording Heidegger a locus <strong>of</strong> operation immune to the<br />
vicissitudes <strong>of</strong> scientific or theoretical destabilisation. It is in this region that<br />
Heidegger develops notions <strong>of</strong> fallenness as constituents <strong>of</strong> the temporal and<br />
interpretive structure <strong>of</strong> Dasein.<br />
In <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>, James Joyce is also concerned with fundamental existential<br />
ground. Much like Heidegger, Joyce demonstrates his intention to excavate<br />
traditional notions <strong>of</strong> the human subject to find an underlying existential or<br />
ontological structure. 13 In Joyce’s case, this structure is an archetypal narrative <strong>of</strong><br />
man’s fallenness. In the characters <strong>of</strong> Bygmester Finnegan, Humphrey Chimpden<br />
Earwicker (HCE) and Anna Livia Plurabelle (ALP), he presents existential<br />
11 I capitalise Being as a translation <strong>of</strong> the German Sein in order to preserve something <strong>of</strong> the term’s<br />
gravitas.<br />
12 Martin Heidegger, Basic Questions <strong>of</strong> Philosophy, trans. Richard Rojcewicz and Andre Schuwer<br />
(Bloomington: Indiana <strong>University</strong> Press, 1994), 5.<br />
13 That is, metaphysical approaches in general and most notably the Cartesian cogito.<br />
6
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
disclosures that share many <strong>of</strong> the structural features <strong>of</strong> Dasein. To begin our close<br />
reading <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>, I will present two long quotations exploring the text’s<br />
notion <strong>of</strong> fallenness which will then be analysed in detail. Upon the “fall <strong>of</strong> a once<br />
wallstrait oldparr,” we learn <strong>of</strong> Finn that,<br />
[t]he humptyhillhead <strong>of</strong> humself promptly sends an unquiring one well to the west<br />
in quest <strong>of</strong> his tumptytumtoes: and their upturnpikepointandplace is at the knock in<br />
the park where oranges have been laid to rust upon the green since devlinsfirst<br />
loved livvy […]. Well, Him being so on the flounder <strong>of</strong> his bulk like an overgrown<br />
babeling […] from the foot <strong>of</strong> the bill to ireglint’s eye he calmy extensolies. (FW 3–6)<br />
“Humptyhillhead” suggests the head <strong>of</strong> the fallen HCE (in his primordial incarnation<br />
as Big Master Finnegan) lies at the hill <strong>of</strong> Howth Castle (HCE is ‘Howth Castle<br />
Environs’). West <strong>of</strong> Howth hill lies the village <strong>of</strong> Chapelizod, with its turnpike, and<br />
Phoenix Park, where it is suggested Finn’s feet rest “upturnpikepointandplace”. We<br />
are told that, lying prone he “calmly extensolies”, suggesting “extended, so lies” with<br />
perhaps also an echo <strong>of</strong> ‘existential’. We learn similarly <strong>of</strong> his son, Shaun, that, as the<br />
four judges approach him to enquire into the nature <strong>of</strong> his Being,<br />
[a]feared themselves were to wonder at the class <strong>of</strong> a crossroads puzzler he would<br />
likely be, length by bredth nonplussing his thickness, ells upon ells <strong>of</strong> him, making<br />
so many square yards <strong>of</strong> him, one half <strong>of</strong> him in Conn’s half but the whole <strong>of</strong> him<br />
nevertheless in Owenmore’s five quarters. There would he lay till they would him<br />
descry, spancelled down upon a blossomy bed, at one foule stretch, amongst the<br />
daffydowndillies, the flowers <strong>of</strong> narcosis fourfettering his footlights, a halohedge <strong>of</strong><br />
wild spuds hovering over him, epicures waltzing with gardenfillers, puritan shoots<br />
advancing to Aran chiefs. (FW 475)<br />
Shaun is described as lying across Ireland’s ancient divide between “Conn’s half”<br />
and “Owen’s half,” being covered by various kinds <strong>of</strong> potatoes (Flounders, Epicures,<br />
Garden Fillers, Aran Chiefs). Much like Dasein, HCE does not, in its regular,<br />
everyday comportment, encounter itself as a detached, Cartesian subject. Both Finn<br />
and Shaun are woven into the landscape. Like Dasein, HCE is an existential clearing<br />
in which man and world show up. If Dasein is said to be ‘Being-in-the-world’, HCE<br />
might be termed, in accordance with his publican pr<strong>of</strong>ession, as ‘Being-INN-the-<br />
world’. The world <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wake</strong> is not a simple ‘wherein’ <strong>of</strong> a narrative but a surreal<br />
manifestation bound-up with that narrative.<br />
7
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
Let us examine the narrative more closely. According to McHugh, the etymology<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Basque word for orange is “the fruit which was first eaten.” 14 Taken with the<br />
Irish flag we find in “oranges laid to rust upon the green,” this suggests that the Irish<br />
nation is itself in some sense fallen. This biblical imagery is enhanced when we<br />
realise that “devlin first loved livvy” reveals not only a relationship between Dublin<br />
and the River Liffey but the Devil (as a tempting serpent) and Eve. We are even told<br />
that Finn lies like an overgrown “babeling” (Tower <strong>of</strong> Babel). He is symbolised by<br />
the ‘Ш’ rune depicting man’s prone state. Shaun is described as lying in “one foule<br />
stretch” for “ells upon ells,” a Miltonic metaphor reminding <strong>of</strong> Satan lying prostrate,<br />
outcast to the fires <strong>of</strong> Hell. This “fall <strong>of</strong> a once wallstrait oldparr” is repeated<br />
endlessly in all forms <strong>of</strong> HCE from Adam to Shaun.<br />
As statements <strong>of</strong> the recurring “fall” theme, these biblical and national images<br />
suggest that Irish religious and cultural structures have themselves grown out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
underlying structure <strong>of</strong> human being. We learn <strong>of</strong> HCE that “Father Barley […] got<br />
up <strong>of</strong> a morning arley and he met with a plattonem blondes names Hips and Haws”<br />
(FW 257), suggesting how the archetypal man, in his fallen state, is similar to John<br />
Barleycorn, a pagan symbol for the process <strong>of</strong> the barley harvest and brewing <strong>of</strong> beer<br />
and whiskey. The theme <strong>of</strong> Earwicker’s seduction by the two maids (“Hips” and<br />
“Haws”) finds echo here in the process <strong>of</strong> brewing beer. The world <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wake</strong> is<br />
narratively bound to the fall <strong>of</strong> man. This narrative structure is imbricated into the<br />
very landscape itself.<br />
Fallenness [Verfallenheit] is also an important aspect <strong>of</strong> Dasein, being associated<br />
with its authenticity [Eigentlichkeit]. Indeed, “falling reveals an essential ontological<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> Dasein itself.” 15 Hubert Dreyfus outlines three forms <strong>of</strong> this structure:<br />
absorption, language and reflexivity. 16 Let us examine these. Dasein does not exist as<br />
a subject but is instead already bound up with the world such that it is the clearing-<br />
foundation in which human subjectivity shows up.<br />
14 Roland McHugh, Annotations To <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins <strong>University</strong> Press, 2006),<br />
3.<br />
15 Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, John & Robinson, Edward (Oxford: Blackwell<br />
Publishing, 2006 [1962]), 224. In the following this source will be quoted in the continuous text as BT.<br />
16 Hubert Dreyfus, Being-in-the-world (Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, 1991).<br />
8
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
In falling, Dasein itself as factical Being-in-the-world, is something from which it has<br />
already fallen-away […]. [It] has fallen into the world, which itself belongs to its<br />
being. […]<br />
In the kind <strong>of</strong> handling and being-busy which is “absorbed in the thing one is<br />
handling” […] the essential structure <strong>of</strong> care — falling — makes itself known. (BT<br />
226 ff.)<br />
The care structure <strong>of</strong> Dasein’s skilled coping makes falling a necessity. Only as result<br />
<strong>of</strong> its fallenness can something like a subject (‘factical Being-in-the-world’) emerge<br />
within the pre-subjective clearing <strong>of</strong> Dasein. This subject, or self, which emerges in<br />
Dasein, is given identity by the inherited ‘for-the-sake-<strong>of</strong>-which’ 17 upon which Dasein<br />
takes a public stand. This possibility gives meaning to the ‘handling and being-busy’<br />
<strong>of</strong> Dasein’s daily concerns, and provides the identity upon which it publicly takes a<br />
stand. That is, in falling, Dasein interprets itself in terms <strong>of</strong> the care structure that<br />
reveals the ‘there’ into which it has fallen, the situation into which it is ‘thrown’<br />
[geworfen]. This situation is the nature <strong>of</strong> Dasein’s facticity. Dasein can never recover a<br />
grounded essence. It is always already ‘thrown’ [geworfen] into Being in that its being<br />
is always already an issue for it. Dasein’s ‘thrownness’ [Geworfenheit] is the content <strong>of</strong><br />
its ‘facticity’ [Faktizität], or worldly situation, flavoured by its ‘state-<strong>of</strong>-mind’<br />
[Befindlichkeit], or ‘attunement’ [Stimmung]. Because it is thus fallen, and hence not<br />
grounded, Dasein is “interpretation all the way down.” 18 It did not choose the<br />
thrownness <strong>of</strong> its existence but must inexorably take a stand on it.<br />
As it is ungrounded in this way, occupying only public stations <strong>of</strong> Being,<br />
Heidegger speaks <strong>of</strong> Dasein having fallen into the ‘one self’ [das Man] (an agreed upon<br />
way <strong>of</strong> public being). Unless Dasein comes to awareness <strong>of</strong> its existential thrownness,<br />
and chooses to inhabit the one with resolute authenticity; that is, in a way which<br />
recognises its groundless nature but heroically presses towards a public identity<br />
nonetheless, Dasein obscures the anxiety <strong>of</strong> its own thrownness. In <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>,<br />
Shem poses the question, “when is a man not a man?” and answers “when he is<br />
sham.” When is he “sham”? When he “yeat the abblokooken” (FW 170) (eats the<br />
17 Dasein’s ‘for-the-sake-<strong>of</strong>-which’ is the particular existentiell modality into which, as a possibility, it<br />
projects itself. Dasein projects itself towards its possibilities by enpresenting [gegenwärtingen] beings<br />
in its world as the ‘towards-which’ [das Wozu] <strong>of</strong> an ‘in-order-to’ [das Um-zu]. In being a student, for<br />
example, Dasein enpresents the ready-to-hand <strong>of</strong> a computer towards typing in order to write an essay<br />
for the sake <strong>of</strong> being a student.<br />
18 Dreyfus, Being-in-the-world (cf. note 17), 300.<br />
9
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
cooking apple), when he falls away from himself, when he loses himself in the one,<br />
when he covers over his own mortality.<br />
“For the most part, everyday Dasein covers up the ownmost possibility <strong>of</strong> its<br />
Being — that possibility which is non-relational and not to be outstripped” (BT 301).<br />
Dasein, like HCE fleeing from his accusers, tries to deny its own structure. The<br />
“possibility which is non-relational and not to be outstripped” is nothing other than<br />
the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> death, or Dasein’s demise. For Shem and for Heidegger, men are<br />
not men when they evade the truth <strong>of</strong> their guilt, (or for Heidegger, the truth <strong>of</strong> their<br />
death). As with <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>, Being and Time appears to cultivate a peculiarly<br />
buried, non-temporal narrative, with Heidegger proposing that Dasein switches from<br />
inauthenticity to resoluteness after its conscience calls it to guilt. Later we will<br />
explore the concept <strong>of</strong> resolute Dasein and the notion <strong>of</strong> guilt in greater depth. First,<br />
though, we will investigate another modality <strong>of</strong> Dasein’s fallenness, that <strong>of</strong> language.<br />
While Dasein is always already fallen, severed from the nothingness <strong>of</strong> its roots,<br />
we are afforded a glimpse <strong>of</strong> HCE in a pre-fallen state, “before he fell hill he filled<br />
heaven: a stream, alplapping streamlet, coyly coiled um, cool <strong>of</strong> her curls” (FW 57).<br />
Yet while this vista, an eirenic vision <strong>of</strong> male and female archetypes lying in coitus,<br />
demonstrates the harmonious interaction <strong>of</strong> HCE and ALP, it remains but a fleeting<br />
thought, and is rarely realised in all the ages <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wake</strong>. HCE falls with the first<br />
thunderclap, announcing the end <strong>of</strong> the ginnungagap (in Norse mythology the void<br />
before time), the brief moment before the Vichian ages reset themselves and the cycle<br />
begins anew. Far from “filling heaven,” he is brought low by the scandalous rann<br />
(satirical song once used to humiliate ancient Irish kings) composed by his<br />
detractors. This song, “The Ballad <strong>of</strong> Persse O’Reilly” (perhaps a pun on the female<br />
genitalia and a garrulous “oh really?”) chortles with loquacious glee, humiliatingly<br />
asking all and sundry: “Have you heard <strong>of</strong> one Humpty Dumpty/How he fell with a<br />
roll and a rumble […]/He was one time our King <strong>of</strong> the Castle/Now he’s kicked<br />
about like a rotten old parsnip” (FW 45). Although we are told that at one time HCE<br />
was “King <strong>of</strong> the Castle,” as with the Edenic vision, this is never substantiated in<br />
10
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
actuality. The facticity, in Heideggerian terminology, <strong>of</strong> HCE seems always to inherit<br />
the thrownness <strong>of</strong> its fall. It is the rann that holds sway throughout Lucalizod.<br />
The wararrow went round, so it did, (a nation wants a gaze) and the ballad… stumpstampaded<br />
on to a slip <strong>of</strong> blancovide and headed by an excessively rough and red<br />
woodcut, privately printed at the rimepress <strong>of</strong> Delville, soon fluttered its secrets on<br />
white highway and brown byway to the rose <strong>of</strong> the winds and the blew <strong>of</strong> the gaels,<br />
from archway to lattice and from black hand to pink ear, village crying to village,<br />
through the five pussyfours green <strong>of</strong> the united states <strong>of</strong> Scotia Picta. (FW 43)<br />
Thus the intoxicated song spreads across Ireland (Scotia) as a ‘war arrow’ and brings<br />
low Earwicker. Just as Heidegger notes that we never encounter an objective present<br />
“east wind” but rather “wind in the sails”(BT 100) it would seem here that the rann<br />
“flutters its secrets […] to the rose <strong>of</strong> the wrings and the blew <strong>of</strong> the gaels.” The very<br />
elements themselves are disclosed by the narrative fall. As well as signifying Ireland,<br />
Scotia may also be suggestive <strong>of</strong> Duns Scotus, renowned for his univocal ontology<br />
and doctrine <strong>of</strong> the categories. If we allow ourselves this interpretation, the “united<br />
states” may perhaps refer to his categories <strong>of</strong> Being, with the rann itself the univocity,<br />
or “one voice” <strong>of</strong> Being itself. 19 Given this reading, Being itself is a comedic and<br />
humiliating song with human being the fallen sinner thrust into its midst. The<br />
singers <strong>of</strong> the rann may hold themselves to have embarked on a Dionysiac dance but<br />
in their dreamlike, Appollonian facticity they constantly morph into HCE himself.<br />
One is left to contemplate whether the song <strong>of</strong> Being is the wisdom <strong>of</strong> Silenus, that<br />
the truth <strong>of</strong> human existence is that it would have been better for it never to have<br />
existed at all. 20<br />
19 Scotus proposed a univocal ontology that studied being qua being. For Scotus, Being was<br />
transcendent <strong>of</strong> the Aristotelean categories: substance, time, quality, passion, habitus, relation,<br />
action, place, position and quantity. In rejecting the Thomist distinction between essence and<br />
existence, Scotus proved an influence for Heidegger's conception <strong>of</strong> truth by cultivating the notion<br />
<strong>of</strong> haecceity, or the principle that causes a particular being to be understood as the thing it is. This<br />
moved away from Thomistic conceptions <strong>of</strong> esse that stressed identification <strong>of</strong> beings by genera or<br />
universal type. Heidegger’s conception <strong>of</strong> Being as employed in Being and Time suggests something<br />
<strong>of</strong> Scotus’ haecceity. For more on Heidegger’s relation to Duns Scotus see his Die Kategorien- und<br />
Bedeutungslehre des Duns Scotus (1916).<br />
20 Georges Bataille contemplates the farcical absurdity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>, proposing that HCE counters<br />
Hegel’s notion <strong>of</strong> the pious lord with that <strong>of</strong> a comic sovereign, finding humour in the realisation<br />
that meaning arises only as it is projected upon non-meaning, or death. Derrida explores the<br />
implications <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wake</strong>’s laughter, both tyrannous and absurdly whimsical. See Georges Bataille,<br />
“Hegel, Death and Sacrifice,” in Deucalion 5 (1955), reproduced in Yale French Studies 78. On Bataille,<br />
trans. Jonathan Strauss, ed. Allan Stoekl (1990), 9–28, and Jacques Derrida, “Two Words For Joyce,”<br />
(cf. note 4).<br />
11
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
Before we see why this reading can be avoided, let us observe that with this rann<br />
we have encountered another way in which Dasein is fallen: its subjection to idle talk<br />
[Gerede]:<br />
Discourse, which belongs to the essential state <strong>of</strong> Dasein’s Being and has a share in<br />
constituting Dasein’s disclosedness, has the possibility <strong>of</strong> becoming idle talk. And<br />
when it does so, it serves not so much to keep Being-in-the-world open for us in an<br />
articulated understanding, as rather to close it <strong>of</strong>f, and cover up the beings within<br />
the world. (BT 213)<br />
Discourse, as the logos, is the way in which we let something be shown, or<br />
articulated as the thing it is. As Being-in-the-world, Dasein pre-ontologically discloses<br />
beings as they are given by the world’s background nexus. This world-nexus can be<br />
articulated like joints (perhaps in a skeleton). Discourse can take the form <strong>of</strong> telling,<br />
in which one articulates, for example, a hammer as being ‘too heavy’, before reaching<br />
for another. “Telling is the articulation <strong>of</strong> intelligibility” (BT 204 f.). It need not be<br />
linguistic in character — for example, one can tellingly articulate the intelligibility <strong>of</strong><br />
an escalator by using it, or can articulate the above proposition regarding the<br />
hammer by simply discarding it and reaching for another. However, when it speaks<br />
about something towards which it bears no comportment, Dasein has fallen into idle<br />
talk. Idle talk has become de-worlded and, as such, does not articulate the<br />
intelligibility <strong>of</strong> the world, but represents a detached, impoverished way <strong>of</strong><br />
understanding. In short, idle talk passes over the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> the world,<br />
“clos[ing] it <strong>of</strong>f, and cover[ing] up the beings within the world.”<br />
The groundlessness <strong>of</strong> idle talk is no obstacle to its becoming public; instead it<br />
encourages this. Idle talk is the possibility <strong>of</strong> understanding everything without<br />
previously making the thing one’s own. If this were done, idle talk would founder<br />
[…]. Idle talk is something which anyone can rake up; it not only releases one from<br />
the task <strong>of</strong> genuinely understanding, but develops an undifferentiated kind <strong>of</strong><br />
intelligibility, for which nothing is closed <strong>of</strong>f any longer. (BT 213)<br />
Idle talk does not grant informed articulation but empty, de-worlded speculation. In<br />
idle talk, Dasein has not articulated a being in its world situation, ‘making the thing<br />
one’s own.’ Against analytical tradition, Heidegger holds that interpretation is<br />
impoverished when it is detached and observational as the merely observational<br />
‘releases one from the task <strong>of</strong> genuinely understanding.’ The ‘present-to-hand’ <strong>of</strong> de-<br />
worlded objects, that is, is the province <strong>of</strong> the correct but not <strong>of</strong> truth.<br />
12
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
In <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>, as we have seen, Joyce certainly seems to suggest that human<br />
beings suffer negative consequences from idle talk. After relentlessly heckling HCE<br />
over his alleged scandals, the customers at his inn announce that “you’ll read it<br />
tomorrow, marn, when the curds on the table” (FW 374). The scandal <strong>of</strong> Earwicker<br />
lacks any ground. It is confused, and those who partake in spreading it themselves<br />
merge into the accused. Yet nothing can prevent it being blared by tabloid headlines.<br />
Perhaps feeling that he has strayed too far from what Heidegger would term the<br />
public identity <strong>of</strong> how one is a gentleman, Earwicker scrambles to articulate a defence<br />
<strong>of</strong> himself, arguing that though he has surely done wrong in his life, “I like to think<br />
[…] confessedly in my baron gentilhomme to the manhor bourne”(FW 365). That is,<br />
he considers himself a gentleman (or gentle homme) still, though even this defence is<br />
contaminated with “confess[ion]”, barrenness, and the unchaste image <strong>of</strong> ‘man<br />
whore’. The tension between idle talk and discourse thus gives rise to panic and<br />
guilt. In idle talk, the subtlety <strong>of</strong> the human being and its complexity is levelled into<br />
dismissive categorisation. One is ‘guilty’ because they say so. Propositional<br />
definitions have replaced (and obscured) discursive understanding. HCE is defeated,<br />
beaten and left to lie fallen on his bar room floor.<br />
III.Existential Guilt: Resolution or Redemption?<br />
Pressing our enquiry into these narratives we approach the issue <strong>of</strong> guilt. In the face<br />
<strong>of</strong> idle talk, the futility <strong>of</strong> Earwicker’s discourse reveals him in his guilt. Conversely,<br />
for Dasein, as we will see, guilt is what calls human being away from idle talk. In both<br />
instances guilt is a core structure <strong>of</strong> human being. In regards to their function as<br />
narratives, does guilt reveal in Being and Time and <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> what might be<br />
called ‘resolute salvation’?<br />
In Being and Time, guilt is that which reveals Dasein as the being it is. Dasein is<br />
called to authenticity by its guilty conscience. “This call whose mood has been<br />
attuned by anxiety is what makes it possible first and foremost for Dasein to project<br />
itself upon its ownmost potentiality for being” (BT 322). This “ownmost possibility”<br />
is Dasein’s death. Only by embracing this revelation can Dasein comport itself<br />
13
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
authentically. The call <strong>of</strong> conscience to guilt [Gewissensruf] reveals a fundamental<br />
lack. For Heidegger, “if one takes ‘laden with moral guilt’ as a ‘quality’ <strong>of</strong> Dasein, one<br />
has said very little.” (BT 328). Guilt is not a simple emotion; 21 Dasein is guilty, rather,<br />
in its very existential structure. Dasein is guilty in its ownmost possibility. Heidegger<br />
writes: “We define the formally existential idea <strong>of</strong> the ‘Guilty!’ as ‘Being-the-basis for<br />
a Being which has been defined by a “not”’ — that is to say, as ‘Being-the-basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />
nullity’”(BT 328). What is this nullity? Heidegger writes that Dasein is<br />
[…] never existent before its ground, but rather in each case only in terms <strong>of</strong> it and as<br />
it. Being the ground therefore means never to have power over One’s ownmost<br />
being from the ground up. This not belongs to the existential sense <strong>of</strong> thrownness.<br />
Being the ground is itself a nullity <strong>of</strong> itself. (BT 284)<br />
That is, Dasein cannot ever get back behind its thrownness, it is “never existent before<br />
its ground.” Dasein can never climb out <strong>of</strong> the world such that its existence is no<br />
longer <strong>of</strong> any concern to it, being instead always already bound up with a care<br />
structure that presents its thrown facticity in accordance with its attunement. In<br />
anxiety, Dasein realises it is thus imprisoned, and realises that grounded meaning is<br />
forever elusive outside <strong>of</strong> its ownmost possibility <strong>of</strong> death.<br />
The call <strong>of</strong> conscience, then, reveals Dasein as guilty, and to be authentic, Dasein<br />
must embrace this guilt. In the vernacular, it might be said that Dasein must accept<br />
itself for what it is. By accepting fallen meaning as fallen, Dasein casts <strong>of</strong>f distraction<br />
and dwells mindfully in the heritage <strong>of</strong> the one. This has pr<strong>of</strong>ound implications as a<br />
social narrative, as Dasein opens itself up to cultural, religious and even literary<br />
narratives as the determining source <strong>of</strong> its meaning. But what <strong>of</strong> Earwicker? Does<br />
guilt likewise lead him out <strong>of</strong> fallenness? HCE’s guilt, while no less axiological, may<br />
seem at fist glance more traditionally moral, though, as we will see, as an archetypal<br />
narrative Earwicker is no less prone to his thrown nullity.<br />
The Earwicker narrative is universal to all men. “[I]t was […] a pleasant turn <strong>of</strong><br />
the populace which gave him as sense <strong>of</strong> those normative letters the nickname Here<br />
comes Everybody” (FW 32). In every incarnation, HCE is tempted into scandal. Like<br />
Dasein, HCE seems unable to get behind its thrownness. Earwicker is always unable<br />
to avoid its facticity, characterised by its thrownness into moral guilt. Earwicker’s fall<br />
21 For Heidegger, there is no ethical transgression involved in the guilt.<br />
14
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
is predicated on Finn’s and re-enacted by Shaun. As Campbell and Robinson aver,<br />
“the bier <strong>of</strong> Finnegan is the stage on which history enacts itself in the goings and<br />
comings <strong>of</strong> HCE.” 22 Finn, as the original faller, is the existential structure <strong>of</strong> HCE who<br />
in turn is the existential structure <strong>of</strong> Shaun and Shem. Together the male archetypes<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> are the paternal structure <strong>of</strong> human being. As a trinity,<br />
grandfather, father and sons are ‘Dadsein’.<br />
What <strong>of</strong> the female? In Being and Time, Heidegger is silent on the question <strong>of</strong><br />
gender, referring to Dasein in the neuter and presumably regarding sex as a specific<br />
existentiell. ALP, however, as female, is complicit in HCE’s transgression and yet is<br />
also HCE's loyal defender. She <strong>of</strong>fers “a reiz every morning for Standfast Dick and a<br />
drop every minute for Stumblestone Davy” (FW 210). As her namesake suggests,<br />
Anna Liffey is the river <strong>of</strong> life that flows around HCE. The dramatic narrative <strong>of</strong><br />
human being is always a question <strong>of</strong> gender: “Every telling has a taling and that’s the<br />
he and she <strong>of</strong> it” (FW 213). The narratives <strong>of</strong> HCE and ALP are entwined in primal<br />
Being-with. Joyce once wrote that, in her youth, “[ALP’s] Pandora’s box [contained]<br />
all the ills flesh is heir to.” 23 Yet still she <strong>of</strong>fers “the primal sacrament <strong>of</strong> baptism or<br />
the regeneration <strong>of</strong> all men by affusion <strong>of</strong> water,” (FW 564) consoling her husband:<br />
“Rise up […] you have slept too long. You did so drool. I was so sharm. But there’s a<br />
great poet in you too!” (FW 619). ALP is both the alpha <strong>of</strong> the fall and the omega <strong>of</strong><br />
redemption. Ultimately, HCE’s guilt is made bearable because it is washed clean by<br />
ALP in the forgetful (Lethe) waters <strong>of</strong> her life (Liffey). HCE is forgiven his<br />
transgressions by the very being against whom he has transgressed. There can be no<br />
permanent resolution or closure, but, as the narrative repeats, perpetual consolation.<br />
It is this consolation that provides a way out <strong>of</strong> despair. Existentially, ‘Dadsein’ is cast<br />
between these poles <strong>of</strong> transgression and redemption. ALP first entices, flowing like<br />
a river from “swerve <strong>of</strong> shore to bend <strong>of</strong> bay” (FW 3) before washing clean her<br />
husband’s guilt. Guilt is primal but so is salvation. One is the possibility for the other<br />
and these two faces <strong>of</strong> ALP flow around the bifurcated, lustful-penant HCE.<br />
22 Joseph Campbell and Henry Morton Robinson, A Skeleton Key to <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> (New York: The<br />
Viking Press, 1972), 95.<br />
23 Richard Ellman, James Joyce (Oxford: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press, 1983), 564.<br />
15
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
But is ALP herself wholly subordinate to a male protagonist? For Joyce, is woman<br />
placed into existence to be the plaything and comforter <strong>of</strong> man? In her final<br />
epiphanic moments before rebirth, ALP is presented as if with a choice. Running out<br />
towards the sea, weary with the detritus <strong>of</strong> life, she realises, as if addressing her<br />
husband on the shore, “I thought you were all glittering with the noblest <strong>of</strong> carriage.<br />
You’re only a bumpkin. I thought you were great in all things, in guilt and in glory.<br />
You’re but a puny. Home!” (FW 627). The cares <strong>of</strong> her life, her concern for her<br />
husband, are suddenly cast <strong>of</strong>f and placed into perspective. Man’s guilt and<br />
redemption, his existential meaning, are “puny” irrelevances. She is free to turn<br />
towards her home. ALP’s existential narrative will be interrupted by the ginnungagap<br />
<strong>of</strong> her dissolution in a primal sea.<br />
I go back to you, my cold father, my cold mad father, cold mad feary father, till the<br />
near sight <strong>of</strong> the mere size <strong>of</strong> him, the moyles and moyles <strong>of</strong> it, moananoaning,<br />
makes me seasilt saltsick and I rush, my only, into your arms. (FW 628)<br />
But what is this? This primal sea is not feminine. Having scarcely finished<br />
renouncing the concerns <strong>of</strong> men, ALP greets not her primal mother but her father.<br />
How exactly are we to interpret this passage?<br />
The diabolical duality <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> rises here to a crescendo. ALP seemingly<br />
longs to return to her father, and yet speaks <strong>of</strong> him as a lover, suggesting a return to<br />
HCE. Addressing this male entity, she wishes to “rush, my only, into [his] arms” and<br />
yet at once proclaims him “cold,” “mad” and “feary.” It becomes clear that an<br />
obscene phallic pun runs through the passage, with ALP exclaiming at the “mere size<br />
<strong>of</strong> him” and complaining <strong>of</strong> being “seasilt saltsick” after his “moananoaning”<br />
(echoing onanism). To be blunt, it appears ALP has said farewell to men only to rush<br />
into the arms <strong>of</strong> her lover who is also her father upon whom she performs incestuous<br />
fellatio. The possibility <strong>of</strong> simple redemption or resolution for either character is thus<br />
scandalised by the complexity <strong>of</strong> the final male archetype into which ALP flows.<br />
Even here, at the end <strong>of</strong> the cycle, the dual nexus <strong>of</strong> guilt and redemption continues<br />
to provide the uttermost horizon <strong>of</strong> human being. Guilt-redemption is the rootless<br />
thrownness <strong>of</strong> existence. And then it begins again: a comedy <strong>of</strong> secular soteriology.<br />
16
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
Issue 1 (2011)<br />
Resolute Dasein is ‘redeemed’ from inauthenticity as it presses into the identities<br />
<strong>of</strong> its cultural world, mindfully aware <strong>of</strong> their ultimate groundlessness. If Heidegger<br />
seems oblivious to the Wildean irony this commitment entails, something <strong>of</strong> his<br />
bluster is avoided in the troubled social standings <strong>of</strong> HCE and ALP. For Here Comes<br />
Everybody, replacing solemn heroism with uproarious farce.<br />
Contact Address:<br />
Michael Gilbert, michaelgilbert577@hotmail.co.uk.<br />
Keywords:<br />
English: James Joyce, <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>; Martin Heidegger, Being and Time;<br />
Hermeneutics; Ontology; Phenomenology.<br />
German: James Joyce, <strong>Finnegans</strong> <strong>Wake</strong>; Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit;<br />
Hermeneutik; Ontologie; Phänomenologie.<br />
eTransfers. A Postgraduate eJournal for Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies<br />
http://eTransfers.uni-giessen.de<br />
http://www.sllf.qmul.ac.uk/research/anglogerman/etransfers/<br />
17