11.07.2015 Views

Impact Delamination and Fracture in Aluminum/Acrylic Sandwich ...

Impact Delamination and Fracture in Aluminum/Acrylic Sandwich ...

Impact Delamination and Fracture in Aluminum/Acrylic Sandwich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ConclusionsFrom this study one can conclude that• impact damage <strong>in</strong> acrylic is very sensitive to impactheight (hence impact velocity) <strong>and</strong> temperature;• though provid<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> shield<strong>in</strong>g for impact, alum<strong>in</strong>umface sheets can not prevent delam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> fracturefrom happen<strong>in</strong>g;• delam<strong>in</strong>ation occurs before crack<strong>in</strong>g if alum<strong>in</strong>um shieldis on top of acrylic whereas crack<strong>in</strong>g precededdelam<strong>in</strong>ation if acrylic is struck first;• simple theory of stress wave propagation can be used toexpla<strong>in</strong> the formation of radial <strong>and</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g cracks.AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by NASA Faculty Award forResearch (FAR) under Grant No. NAG3-2259 <strong>and</strong> byPSC-CUNY under Grants 69394-00 29 <strong>and</strong> 61429-00 01.Dr. Kenneth J. Bowles is the Technical Monitor of the NASAgrant. Part of the equipment used <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>vestigation wasacquired through Army Research Office Grant No. DAAD19-99-1-0366.References1. J. R. V<strong>in</strong>son, Behavior of S<strong>and</strong>wich Structures ofIsotropic <strong>and</strong> Composite Materials, TechnomicPublish<strong>in</strong>g Co., Lancaster, PA, 1999.2. S. A. Ambartsumyan, Theory of Anisotropic Plates:Strength, Stability, vibration, Technomic Publish<strong>in</strong>g Co.,Stamford, CT, 1970.3. A. Leissa, Vibration of Plates, Repr<strong>in</strong>ted Edition,Acoustical Society of America, 1993.4. Y.-Y. Yu, Vibrations of Elastic Plates, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag,New York, 1996.5. N. Jones, Structural <strong>Impact</strong>, Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, UK, 1989.6. S. Abrate, <strong>Impact</strong> on Composite Structures, CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.7. C. Hiel, D. Dittman, <strong>and</strong> O. Ishai, “Composite s<strong>and</strong>wichconstruction with syntactic foam core: A practicalassessment of post-impact damage <strong>and</strong> residualstrength,” Composites, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 447-450,1993.8. T. Gottesman, S. Grishovich, E. Drukker, N. Sela, <strong>and</strong> J.Log, “Residual strength of impacted composite: analysis<strong>and</strong> tests,” J. Composites Technology <strong>and</strong> Research,Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 244-255, 1994.9. A. Vlot, “<strong>Impact</strong> Properties of fiber metal lam<strong>in</strong>ates,”Composite Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 911-927,1993.10. A. N. Nayfeh, Wave Propagation <strong>in</strong> Layered AnisotropicMedia with Applications to Composites, ElsevierScience, Amsterdam, The Nethel<strong>and</strong>s, 1995.11. W. D. Callister, Jr., Materils Science <strong>and</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g:An Introduction, 5th Ed., Wiley, New York, 2000.1.25” 1.5”Figure 1. Damage patterns of cast acrylic impacted by aweight dropped from different heights at roomtemperature.Load (N)1400900400-100LoadEnergy1.25 <strong>in</strong>ch drop1.5 <strong>in</strong>ch drop0 2 4 6 8 10 12Time (ms)Figure 2. Time histories of load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> energy of a purecast acrylic plate impacted at room temperatureby a weight dropped from different heights.1” 2” 3”Figure 3. Damage patterns of cast acrylic with alum<strong>in</strong>umshield<strong>in</strong>g on top impacted by a weight droppedfrom different heights at room temperature.2.52.01.51.00.50.0Energy (J)517


Load (N)40003000200010000-1000EnergyLoad1 <strong>in</strong>ch drop2 <strong>in</strong>ch drop3 <strong>in</strong>ch drop0 5 10 15 20Time (ms)Figure 4. Time histories of load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> energy of a castacrylic plate with alum<strong>in</strong>um shield<strong>in</strong>g on topimpacted at room temperature by a weightdropped from different heights.2520151050Energy (J)180°F 205°FFigure 7. Damage patterns of cast acrylic at varioustemperatures impacted by a weight dropped from5”.Load (N)240019001400900400-100LoadEnergy180 F205 F0 5 10 15 20Time (ms)1086420Energy (J)Figure 8. Time histories of load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> energy of a purecast acrylic specimen impacted at varioustemperatures by a weight dropped from 5”.3001” 3” 5”Figure 5. Damage patterns of cast acrylic with alum<strong>in</strong>umsupport from bottom impacted by a weightdropped from different heights at roomtemperature.Load (N)500040003000200010000-1000LoadE n e yEnergy1 <strong>in</strong>ch drop3 <strong>in</strong>ch drop5 <strong>in</strong>ch drop0 5 10 15 20Time (ms)50403020100Energy (J)Crack length (mm)2502001501005000 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250Temperature (F)Figure 9. Temperature effect on total crack length <strong>in</strong> a purecast acrylic specimen impacted by a weightdropped from 5”.Figure 6. Time histories of load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> energy of a castacrylic plate with alum<strong>in</strong>um support from bottomimpacted at room temperature by a weightdropped from different heights.518

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!