11.07.2015 Views

ssc - 419 supplemental commercial design guidance for fatigue ship ...

ssc - 419 supplemental commercial design guidance for fatigue ship ...

ssc - 419 supplemental commercial design guidance for fatigue ship ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. Lifetime Secondary Loads PredictionTechnology Base <strong>for</strong> Commercial Ships7.1 PurposeThe purpose of this chapter is to identify and list the technology base that supports<strong>commercial</strong> lifetime secondary load predictions. It covers external hydrodynamic pressure andinternal tank loads.7.2 BackgroundThe computation of secondary loads, such as hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads onshell plating, has not received the same degree of emphasis in the literature as has primary hullgirder bending. However, estimates of this loading are essential <strong>for</strong> structural <strong>design</strong>. In manycases, standard hydrostatic heads are retained in classification society rules. Likewise, <strong>for</strong> cargoholds, <strong>design</strong> is based on standard <strong>design</strong> loads that have not been treated in a stochastic manner.McAffe and Nappi (1990) pointed out the importance of secondary loads on the <strong>design</strong> of<strong>ship</strong> structure. The cost to the U.S. Navy to repair damage from wave loads on superstructure,deck-mounted equipment, hull, and appendages was more than $10M in the decade from 1980 to1990. Because of the manner in which costs were characterized, not all of this damage was to<strong>ship</strong> structure, but the results are nevertheless significant, especially as the costs of secondaryeffects, such as the loss of mission capability, were not included. The effect of secondary loadson <strong>ship</strong> <strong>design</strong> was shown, on a weight comparison basis, to be one-half to one-third as importantas primary hull girder loads in typical combatant <strong>ship</strong>s, although <strong>for</strong> larger <strong>ship</strong>s, secondary loadshave a greater effect on <strong>ship</strong> weight. The secondary loads used by the U.S. Navy <strong>for</strong> <strong>design</strong> arebased on historical empirical methods, and could be improved if methods such as <strong>ship</strong> motionprograms were used to predict them.This report describes only those secondary loads that are important <strong>for</strong> <strong>fatigue</strong> analysis:external hydrodynamic pressure, hydrodynamic impact loads, and tank sloshing loads. There aremany other secondary loads that are important <strong>for</strong> structural <strong>design</strong> that are not addressed. Theseloads include tire loads from vehicles or helicopters, hydrostatic loads on bulkheads fromflooding, typical deck live and dead loads, bow bulb or sonar dome slamming loads, anddynamic loads such as air blast, gun blast, or missile blast. In cases where these loadspredominate, local scantlings will be <strong>design</strong>ed to accommodate them, and the cyclic <strong>fatigue</strong>loads will become of less importance in such areas of the structure.7.3 External Hydrodynamic PressureAccurate predictions of pressure distribution on the hull have received attention <strong>for</strong> thecomputation of <strong>fatigue</strong> loads on longitudinal stiffeners and transverse framing. Two differentinvestigators used linear strip theory to predict loads in the mid<strong>ship</strong> region in oblique seas7-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!