6.1.2 CIC’s <strong>Water</strong> Supply ReliabilityAccording to the CIC’s <strong>2010</strong> <strong>UWMP</strong>, the reliability of CIC’s various sources (surface waterdiversion and groundwater) is primarily dependent upon the management of the Main Basin. IfCIC’s annual groundwater right in the Main Basin is exceeded, CIC relies on the availability ofsupplemental imported water used to replace the annual extraction in excess of the annual right.CIC states that in most instances, including during drought years, water stored in the <strong>San</strong>Gabriel Reservoir and Morris Reservoir is available for surface diversion (CIC, 2011). For thesereasons, it is assumed CIC’s relatively small water supply to GSWC is 100 percent reliable.6.1.3 Groundwater Supply ReliabilityGSWC’s <strong>San</strong> <strong>Dimas</strong> <strong>System</strong> has a total share of 1.73984 percent of the total annual OSY of theMain <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin. Under the Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin Judgment the <strong>Water</strong>master isresponsible for managing the groundwater levels at the Baldwin Park Key Well. The Judgmentstates that the <strong>Water</strong>master shall not spread replenishment water when the groundwater level atthe Key Well exceeds 250 feet msl. The Judgment also states that the <strong>Water</strong>master shallspread replacement water necessary to maintain the water level elevation above 200 feet msl.During the period of management under the Judgment, significant drought events haveoccurred from 1969 to 1977, 1983 to 1991, and 1998 to 2004. In each drought cycle the Main<strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin was managed to maintain groundwater levels. Based on historicmanagement practices, all pumpers from the Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin are expected to haveadequate supply over the next 25 years under single year and multiple year drought periods(TVMWD, 2011). The TVMWD’s <strong>UWMP</strong> provides basin-wide details concerning the reliability ofthe Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin.GSWC and other water producers participate with the responsible agency, TVMWD, to ensurethat the OSY is available to the pumpers in the Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin. The TVMWD has acyclic storage agreement with Metropolitan and the Main Basin <strong>Water</strong>master. Cyclic storageaccounts have been used to increase storage in the basin since 1975. Metropolitan pre-deliversreplenishment water to the Basin and later sells the stored water to the water districts at areduced rate. Metropolitan can store up to 40,000 ac-ft of water for the TVMWD. Currently,Metropolitan has 11,200 ac-ft of water in storage for TVMWD (Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin<strong>Water</strong>master <strong>2010</strong>).The Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Groundwater Basin’s pumping and reliability is subject to the OSYestablished each fiscal year by the <strong>Water</strong>master and the availability of replenishment water.Long-term cyclic storage provides a mechanism that allows the responsible agency to establisha buffer during droughts and periods of reduced OSY by allowing for storage recharge watersduring times of available import supplies. Recharge in the basin occurs from percolation ofprecipitation, return flow of applied water, some septic system discharges, and stream flow.Recharge through streams and spreading basins is generated from runoff from surroundingmountains and imported water from the <strong>State</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Project and the Colorado River. TheTVMWD also continues to evaluate alternatives to augment Metropolitan’s imported supply,such as implementation of recycled water programs.There are pending amendments to the Judgment that would enhance groundwater reliability inthe basin. The <strong>Water</strong>master has determined that its 1973 Judgment may require changes toreflect the current conditions and allow the <strong>Water</strong>master more flexibility in securing necessarysupplemental supplies. The <strong>Water</strong>master expects proposed changes to be finalized andsubmitted to the Los Angeles Superior Court for approval after FY <strong>2010</strong>-11 (<strong>Water</strong>master <strong>2010</strong>).Page 6-4Final Report, <strong>2010</strong> Urban <strong>Water</strong> Management Plan – <strong>San</strong> <strong>Dimas</strong><strong>Golden</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Company</strong>g:\adminasst\jobs\<strong>2010</strong>\1070001.00_gswc-uwmp\09-reports\9.09-reports\2011-08\grp2b\gswc_sandimas_<strong>2010</strong>_uwmp-final.doc
Some of the key proposed changes that would enhance basin groundwater reliability andreduce vulnerability to droughts and uncertain imported supplies include:• Storage and export – allow for outside water to be stored and exported by agreement with<strong>Water</strong>master;• Recycled water – remove the limit on recycled water that can be recharged in one year;• Key Well – eliminate the 250-foot upper limit at the Key Well for spreading imported water;• Assessments – provide a means for the <strong>Water</strong>master to levy assessments to supportendeavors such as pre-purchasing Replacement <strong>Water</strong>, development of new supplementalwater resources (such as the recycled water recharge project), and to buy supplementalwater that may become available unexpectedly or on short notice.6.1.4 <strong>San</strong> <strong>Dimas</strong> <strong>System</strong>’s <strong>Water</strong> Supply ReliabilitySupply reliability for the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Dimas</strong> <strong>System</strong> depends upon the reliability of purchased waterfrom TVMWD and CIC and local groundwater pumping from the Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel GroundwaterBasin, as discussed above.Table 6-1 presents water supply projections for purchased and groundwater sources during anormal year, single-dry year, and multiple-dry years for the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Dimas</strong> <strong>System</strong>. The normalyearsupply represents the expected supply under average hydrologic conditions, the dry-yearsupply represents the expected supply under the single driest hydrologic year, and the multipledryyear supply represents the expected supply during a period of three consecutive dry years.The results, prepared by Metropolitan, show the region’s ability to respond in future years undera repeat of the 1990-1992 hydrology, that is, in the case of multiple-dry years. The results showthat the region can provide reliable water supplies under a series of multiple-dry years. A similaranalysis using the historic hydrology of 1977, the single driest hydrologic year to date, showsthat the region can provide reliable water supplies under a single-dry year.As described above, imported water supplies from TVMWD and CIC are expected to be100 percent reliable to meet demands. Therefore, the purchased water supply projections for anormal water year, single-dry year, and multiple-dry years are taken as the 2035 projection,which is equivalent to the imported water demand projected for 2035. It is assumed that thesingle-dry year and multiple-dry year supplies are the same as those for the normal yearsbecause TVMWD and CIC have stated that they will meet their retailer’s projected demandsunder all anticipated hydrologic conditions. Moreover, the single-dry year and multiple-dry yearavailable supplies are significantly higher than the projected supplies required to meet thedemands.Metropolitan and TVMWD have indicated their plans to continue to implement projects to ensurethe imported water demands can be met under normal, single-dry year, and multiple-dry years.As discussed above, Metropolitan intends to provide 100 percent supply reliability to TVMWD,which in turn will provide 100 percent reliability of imported water supply to the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Dimas</strong><strong>System</strong>.Under the Main <strong>San</strong> Gabriel Basin Judgment, the <strong>Water</strong>master adjusts the OSY annually toaccount for fluctuations in groundwater availability in the Basin. The objective is to ensure thatall pumpers, including GSWC, will have adequate supply to meet their demands during normalyear, single-dry year, and multiple-dry year periods. Replenishment water is used to replace theFinal Report, <strong>2010</strong> Urban <strong>Water</strong> Management Plan – <strong>San</strong> <strong>Dimas</strong> Page 6-5<strong>Golden</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Company</strong>g:\adminasst\jobs\<strong>2010</strong>\1070001.00_gswc-uwmp\09-reports\9.09-reports\2011-08\grp2b\gswc_sandimas_<strong>2010</strong>_uwmp-final.doc
- Page 1:
Final Report2010 Urban Water Manage
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsList of Tables....
- Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents (cont’d)7.3.1.2
- Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents (cont’d)Table 4
- Page 11 and 12:
Notice of AdoptionA meeting to soli
- Page 13 and 14:
Abbreviationsac-ftac-ft/yr or AFYAc
- Page 15 and 16:
RAPRHNARTPResource Action ProgramsR
- Page 17 and 18:
DefinitionsChapter 2, Part 2.6, Div
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Plan Preparation1.1 Back
- Page 21 and 22:
¯1MilesImage Source: ESRIPath: Z:\
- Page 23 and 24:
1.4 Public Utility Commission 2010
- Page 25 and 26:
1.6 Plan Adoption and SubmittalPubl
- Page 27 and 28:
Table 1-2:Summary of UWMP Chapters
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: System DescriptionChapte
- Page 31 and 32:
210%&'(·|}þ57Path: Z:\Projects\GS
- Page 33 and 34: 2.3 Population, Housing and Employm
- Page 35 and 36: 400203400303400203210%&'(4003024012
- Page 37 and 38: As concluded from analysis of SCAG
- Page 39 and 40: presented in inches in Table 2-3. A
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: Water UseSection 10631(e
- Page 43 and 44: The customer billing data for the s
- Page 45 and 46: Table 3-2:Base Period RangesBase Pa
- Page 47 and 48: 20 percent reduction. This method a
- Page 49 and 50: 22,000Number of Active Connections2
- Page 51 and 52: Water Use (ac-ft/yr)18,00016,00014,
- Page 53 and 54: 3.4 Sales to Other AgenciesThere ar
- Page 55 and 56: Total Water Demand(ac-ft/yr)21,0001
- Page 57 and 58: GSWC will not deny or conditionally
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 4: Water SupplyA detailed e
- Page 61 and 62: Table 4-1:Current and Planned Water
- Page 63 and 64: Water-bearing units in the Main San
- Page 65 and 66: Table 4-3:Well Name and CapacityWel
- Page 67 and 68: The Cadiz Project will produce up t
- Page 69 and 70: 150,000 ac-ft/yr of desalination ca
- Page 71 and 72: Because the Whittier Narrows and Sa
- Page 73 and 74: Table 4-16:Potential Future Recycle
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 5: Water QualitySection 106
- Page 77 and 78: water system has been able to compe
- Page 79 and 80: 5.3 Projected Water Quality Impacts
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 6: Water Supply Reliability
- Page 83: • 2008 Water Supply Allocation Pl
- Page 87 and 88: Table 6-2:Basis of Water Year DataW
- Page 89 and 90: Table 6-6:Projected Multiple-Dry Ye
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 7: Conservation Program and
- Page 93 and 94: Table 7-1:CUWCC BMP and UWMP DMMs O
- Page 95 and 96: • Use of potable water which resu
- Page 97 and 98: evenue consisted of 63.1% of San Di
- Page 99 and 100: compliance option water savings tar
- Page 101 and 102: However, if the gpcd begins to incr
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 8: Water Shortage Contingen
- Page 105 and 106: Stage III (20 - 35 percent shortage
- Page 107 and 108: Possible CatastropheTable 8-3:Summa
- Page 109 and 110: In addition to prohibitions, Rule N
- Page 111 and 112: Table 8-7:TypeSummary of Actions an
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 9: ReferencesCalifornia Dep
- Page 115: Appendix AUrban Water Management Pl
- Page 118 and 119: on water management strategies and
- Page 120 and 121: supplier will be reviewing the plan
- Page 122 and 123: (J) Wholesale agency programs.(K) C
- Page 124 and 125: determine that an urban water suppl
- Page 126 and 127: sequence for the agency's water sup
- Page 128 and 129: WATER CODESECTION 10640-1064510640.
- Page 130 and 131: WATER CODESECTION 10650-1065610650.
- Page 133: Appendix BPublic Hearing Notices, N
- Page 136 and 137:
A public hearing to solicit comment
- Page 138 and 139:
A public hearing to solicit comment
- Page 140 and 141:
A public hearing to solicit comment
- Page 142 and 143:
A public hearing to solicit comment
- Page 144 and 145:
May 17, 2011Country of Los AngelesR
- Page 148 and 149:
San Dimas Community Service Area --
- Page 150 and 151:
San Dimas Community Service Area --
- Page 153:
Appendix CCouncil Annual Reports fo
- Page 156 and 157:
Agency: Golden State Water Company
- Page 158 and 159:
Agency: Golden State Water Company
- Page 160 and 161:
Foundation Best Management Practice
- Page 162 and 163:
4CUWCC BMP RETAIL COVERAGE REPORT 2
- Page 165 and 166:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY R
- Page 167 and 168:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY R
- Page 169 and 170:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY R
- Page 171 and 172:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY R
- Page 173 and 174:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY R
- Page 175 and 176:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY R
- Page 177 and 178:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY Revised
- Page 179 and 180:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY Revised
- Page 181 and 182:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY Original
- Page 183 and 184:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY Original
- Page 185 and 186:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY Original
- Page 187:
Appendix EDMM Supporting Documents
- Page 190 and 191:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY Revised
- Page 193:
Appendix FGroundwater Basin Water R
- Page 311 and 312:
Urban Water Management PlanSan Dima
- Page 313:
Urban Water Management PlanSan Dima
- Page 317 and 318:
September 1, 2011City of CovinaMich
- Page 319 and 320:
September 1, 2011City of San DimasD
- Page 321:
September 1, 2011County of Los Ange
- Page 327:
Appendix JUrban Water Management Pl
- Page 330 and 331:
No. UWMP requirement a Calif. Water
- Page 332 and 333:
No. UWMP requirement a Calif. Water
- Page 334 and 335:
No. UWMP requirement a Calif. Water
- Page 336:
UWMPlocationPageNumber7.2 7-4a The