11.07.2015 Views

The Kadison-Singer and Paulsen Problems in Finite Frame Theory

The Kadison-Singer and Paulsen Problems in Finite Frame Theory

The Kadison-Singer and Paulsen Problems in Finite Frame Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 Peter G. Casazza<strong>in</strong>to a f<strong>in</strong>ite number of subsets which were Riesz basic sequences. This led tothe conjecture:Feicht<strong>in</strong>ger Conjecture 1 (FC) Every bounded frame (or equivalently,every unit norm frame) is a f<strong>in</strong>ite union of Riesz basic sequences.<strong>The</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ite dimensional form of FC looks like:Conjecture 7 (F<strong>in</strong>ite Dimensional Feicht<strong>in</strong>ger Conjecture). For every B, C >0, there is a natural number r = r(B, C) <strong>and</strong> a constant A = A(B, C) > 0so that whenever {ϕ i } N i=1 is a frame for HN with upper frame bound B <strong>and</strong>‖ϕ i ‖ ≥ C for all i = 1, 2, . . . , N, then {1, 2, . . . , N} can be partitioned <strong>in</strong>tosubsets {A j } r j=1 so that for each 1 ≤ j ≤ r, {ϕ i} i∈Aj is a Riesz basic sequencewith lower Riesz basis bound A <strong>and</strong> upper Riesz basis bound B.<strong>The</strong>re is a significant body of work on this conjecture [6, 7, 16, 31], yet, itrema<strong>in</strong>s open even for Gabor frames.We now check that the Feicht<strong>in</strong>ger Conjecture is equivalent to PC.<strong>The</strong>orem 5. <strong>The</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g are equivalent:(1) <strong>The</strong> Pav<strong>in</strong>g Conjecture.(2) <strong>The</strong> Feicht<strong>in</strong>ger Conjecture.Proof. (1) ⇒ (2): Part (2) of <strong>The</strong>orem 2 is equivalent to PC <strong>and</strong> clearlyimplies FC.(2) ⇒ (1): We will observe that FC implies Conjecture 4 which is equivalentto PC by <strong>The</strong>orem 3. In Conjecture 4, {T e i } N i=1 is a frame for its spanwith upper frame bound 2. It is now immediate that the F<strong>in</strong>ite DimensionalFeicht<strong>in</strong>ger Conjecture implies Conjecture 4.Another equivalent formulation of KS due to Weaver [43].Conjecture 8 (KS r ). <strong>The</strong>re are universal constants B <strong>and</strong> ɛ > 0 so that the follow<strong>in</strong>gholds. Let {ϕ i } M i=1 be elements of lN 2 with ‖ϕ i ‖ ≤ 1 for i = 1, 2, . . . , M<strong>and</strong> suppose for every x ∈ l N 2 ,M∑|〈x, ϕ i 〉| 2 ≤ B‖x‖ 2 . (1.2)i=1<strong>The</strong>n, there is a partition {A j } r j=1 of {1, 2, . . . , M} so that for all x ∈ lN 2all j = 1, 2, . . . , r, ∑|〈x, ϕ i 〉| 2 ≤ (B − ɛ)‖x‖ 2 .i∈A j<strong>and</strong><strong>The</strong>orem 6. <strong>The</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g are equivalent:(1) <strong>The</strong> Pav<strong>in</strong>g Conjecture.(2) Conjecture KS r holds for some r ≥ 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!