JC Andrews Memorial Award 2007right ratio), and fish oils are the preferred forms <strong>of</strong> omega-3 forhumans. Trans fats are now the villains. In all, we spent nearlytwo decades making new and supposedly healthier foods by removingfat, without real scientific evidence. Despite a plethora<strong>of</strong> low calorie and low fat products in the supermarkets, obesitycontinues to increase.It’s diet, not foodIn a more recent WHO report (Anon, 2003) an Expert ConsultancyPanel identified that changes in diet, eating behaviours,environmental factors, physical activity and fitness levels plusgenetic factors were contributing to the causal factors underlyingnoncommunicable diseases, even in the poorest countries.<strong>The</strong>y consistently emphasised that the concerns around obesitywere related to diets, not individual food products. I fully agreewith this.<strong>The</strong> panel stressed that average per capita supply <strong>of</strong> macronutrients,derived from food commodities on a national basis,did not correspond to actual per capita consumption. If weaccept that the majority <strong>of</strong> consumers in every country are notobese, then clearly a focus on per capita consumption data (andthe calculated calorie intake) is somewhat meaningless in thisdebate. Obesity is evident in developing countries, primarilyconfined to middle aged women living in households, <strong>of</strong>tenwhere others are malnourished. But the science establishingcause and effect has still to be done.the majority <strong>of</strong> consumers in everycountry are not obese<strong>The</strong>re has been a substantial increase in fats in our moderndiets, predominantly vegetable fats. It is assumed this has createdan imbalance in our metabolism which has resulted inobesity. Is there a cause and effect?One dimension has been provided in the 2003 WHO reportas shown in Table 2. This is valuable in assisting food technologists’understanding <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> greatest concern and inaffecting the confidence that experts have in the current state<strong>of</strong> the science. However, direct cause and effect informationis scarce. It is interesting, given the current situation in <strong>New</strong><strong>Zealand</strong>, that the same report states that “despite the obviousimportance <strong>of</strong> the roles that parents and home [and school] environmentsplay on children’s eating and physical activity, thereis very little hard evidence available to support this view.”Health and metabolismLet’s look at the 1990 WHO report again. A diagram in thatreport shows a U-shaped curve for BMI against mortality. <strong>The</strong>report then proceeds to assume a BMI <strong>of</strong> 20-25 is ‘normal’ andappropriate for adults in developed countries. But what has thisTable 2. Summary <strong>of</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> evidence on factors that might promote or protect against weight gain andobesity a08Evidence Decreased risk No relationship Increased riskConvincingRegular physical activityHigh dietary intake <strong>of</strong> NSP (dietaryfibre) bSedentary lifestyleHigh intake <strong>of</strong> energy-densemicronutrient-poor foods cProbableHome and school environments thatsupport healthy food choices forchildren dBreastfeedingHeavy marketing <strong>of</strong> energy-densefoods and fast-food outlets dHigh intake <strong>of</strong> sugars-sweeteneds<strong>of</strong>t drinks and fruit juicesAdverse socioeconomic conditions(in developing countries, especiallywomen) dPossibleLow glycaemic index foodsProtein content <strong>of</strong> thedietLarge portion sizesHigh proportion <strong>of</strong> food preparedoutside the home (developedcountries)“Rigid restraint / periodicdistribution” eating patternsInsufficient Increased eating frequency AlcoholaStrength <strong>of</strong> evidence: the totality <strong>of</strong> the evidence was taken into account. <strong>The</strong> World Cancer Research Fund Schema was takenas the starting point but was modified in the following manner. Randomized controlled trials were given prominence as thehighest ranking study design (randomized controlled trials were not a major source <strong>of</strong> cancer evidence); associated evidenceand expert opinion was also taken into account in relation to environmental determinants (direct trials were usually notavailable).bSpoecific amounts will depend on the analytical methodologies used to measure fibre.cEnergy-dense and micronutrient-poor foods tend to be processed foods that are high in fat and / or sugars. Low energy-dense(or energy-dilute) foods, such as fruit, legumes, vegetables and whole grain cereals, are high in dietary fibre and water.dAssociated evidence and expert opinion included.22 Food <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>
Mortality risk as ratio <strong>of</strong> average for all ages3.02.01.0Mengot to do with health? <strong>The</strong> true science required is to develop arelationship between your personal BMI (or some better measure<strong>of</strong> body composition) and how long you will live. It is anexperiment that can never be performed since we die after onlyone treatment. So science, in this instance, cannot tell an individualwhat their 5/21/07 target 7:15 BMI AM should Page 1 0839_PAL_HalfPg_advert be.3.02.01.020 24 28 32 20 24Body-mass indexWomen<strong>The</strong> 1990 WHO document included a statement:“the cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> a sustained 2% discrepancy betweenenergy intake and energy expenditure can leadin an adult to a 5kg weight change over a period <strong>of</strong> ayear”. This was probably a calculation and a theoreticalconclusion. Similar calculations were made in the 2003 report.C M Y CM MY CY CMY K28 32 36Body-mass index*Reproduced from reference 49, by kind permission <strong>of</strong> the publisher, Recalculated from data in reference 51,with unpublished data from the American Cancer Society.JC Andrews Memorial Award 2007Powerful membrane solutions come insmall packages.<strong>The</strong> Pall Aria AP membrane water filtration packages feature high water flow rates within a small footprint. That translatesinto a smaller building, less waste production, and lower maintenance costs. <strong>The</strong> systems are pre-packaged and skid-mounted,and they’re easy and inexpensive to install, operate and maintain. Our super-tough, patented membranes provide unsurpassedchlorine tolerance and unbeatable flow rates.FREEApplications Guide<strong>The</strong> Pall Aria system’s pressurized membranes enable it to power through periods <strong>of</strong> high turbidity, algae, and organics infeedwater that result from changing seasonal and weather conditions. And the patent-pending EFM technology reduces operatorintervention. <strong>The</strong> packaged systems share the same technologies that make our large municipal systems so dependable.Your most powerful water treatment solution is a small and simple one – the Pall Aria AP system.For details and specifications call 07 957 9519 or visit us at www.pall.com/waterJuly 200723